0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
390 vues1 page
Damasa Crisostomo applied to purchase 200 shares of stock from Quezon Colleges for PHP100 per share. In her application letter, she stated payment would be made after she caught fish. Damasa died without making any payment. Quezon Colleges claimed PHP20,000 from her estate. The court ruled the condition of payment stated by Damasa was not valid because Quezon Colleges did not expressly accept her proposed payment terms, and payment depending solely on her catching fish made the obligation void under the Civil Code.
Damasa Crisostomo applied to purchase 200 shares of stock from Quezon Colleges for PHP100 per share. In her application letter, she stated payment would be made after she caught fish. Damasa died without making any payment. Quezon Colleges claimed PHP20,000 from her estate. The court ruled the condition of payment stated by Damasa was not valid because Quezon Colleges did not expressly accept her proposed payment terms, and payment depending solely on her catching fish made the obligation void under the Civil Code.
Damasa Crisostomo applied to purchase 200 shares of stock from Quezon Colleges for PHP100 per share. In her application letter, she stated payment would be made after she caught fish. Damasa died without making any payment. Quezon Colleges claimed PHP20,000 from her estate. The court ruled the condition of payment stated by Damasa was not valid because Quezon Colleges did not expressly accept her proposed payment terms, and payment depending solely on her catching fish made the obligation void under the Civil Code.
FACTS: On June 1, 1948, Damasa Crisostomo applied for 200 shares of stock worth PhP100.00 each at Quezon Colleges, Inc. Within her letter of application, she stipulated, You will find (Babayaran kong lahat pagkatapos na ako ay makapag-pahuli ng isda) pesos as my initial payment and the balance payable in accordance with law and the rules and regulations of the Quezon College. Damasa died on October 26, 1948. Since no payment was rendered on the subscription made in the foregoing letter, Quezon College presented a claim of PhP20,000.00 on her intestate proceedings. The petitioner administrator of the estate then contests the validity of said proceedings? ISSUE: Is the condition laid down by Damasa Crisostomo valid? RULING: There is nothing in the record to show that the Quezon College, Inc. accepted the term of payment suggested by Damasa Crisostomo, or that if there was any acceptance the same came to her knowledge during her lifetime. As the application of Damasa Crisostomo is obviously at variance with the terms evidenced in the form letter issued by the Quezon College, Inc., there was absolute necessity on the part of the College to express its agreement to Damasa's offer in order to bind the latter. Conversely, said acceptance was essential, because it would be unfair to immediately obligate the Quezon College, Inc. under Damasa's promise to pay the price of the subscription after she had caused fish to be caught. Thus, it cannot be said that the letter ripened into a contract. Indeed, the need for express acceptance on the part of the Quezon College, Inc. becomes the more imperative, in view of the proposal of Damasa Crisostomo to pay the value of the subscription after she has harvested fish, a condition obviously dependent upon her sole will and, therefore, facultative in nature, rendering the obligation void. Under the Civil Code it is provided that if the fulfillment of the condition should depend upon the exclusive will of the debtor, the conditional obligation shall be void.