War Protocols

by Karlo Z. Valois

The protocols are aimed at distance from the mass, never subordinating the
superior to the inferior, dynamic control and awareness in all
circumstances.
Context
Perhaps the most recent texts outlining the kind of war protocol we are now
addressing is Budo Shoshinsu, a collection of the most authentic moral
teachings of the Japanese knights, written in the 16th Century for young
samurais to teach them the foundations of bushido, the spiritual path of the
warrior.
The teachings concern the appropriate perception of death (as an
opportunity for transcendence, which is apparent in everyday behavior,
heightened awareness and the importance of the moment), loyalty (towards
the superior and everything that is superior), high alert (always prepared to
face defining moments), martial arts (control over forces and actualizing
the principle of One, thus creating harmony between the inner world and
the environment), weaponry and behavior without excesses (excess is the
result of attachment: to wine, women, etc.attachment means being
dominated).
To live by the principles outlined in the teachings required to maintain
control over all areas of life (thoughts, emotions, actions on the physical
plane, higher states of consciousness). Control is analogous with
dominance over power(s), a fundamentally solar, male, royal principle.
In short the teachings were oriented towards maintaining the dominance of
the superior (pure, independent/detached, solar, royal, direct, masculine)
over the inferior (attached, dependent, lunar, reflective, dark, feminine).
The difference between Japan in the 1500s and the world at large today is
that Japan was a traditional society, quite isolated from its rapidly
1

degenerating environment. The process of degeneration has continued until

today. Today there is no chance of isolation for traditional world views to
subsist.
Modern world view is pervasive while traditional world view is heavily
attacked and ridiculed at best: modern world view is the direct result of the
general process of involution, while the traditional world view reflects the
state of consciousness dominant before the process of involution
materialisation started.
In the epoch of Tradition the potentialities of various aspects of materialism
were marginalized (in consciousness therefore in society as well, where it
was prevalent among slaves only). Today all these unrealized potentials are
being actualized by inferior people whose lifes purpose is to serve
tendencies (forces) that actualize these potentials (slaves).
We may consider the actualization of potentials natural. What makes the
actualization of all aspects of materialism destructive however is the notion
that it is superior to Absolutism, or that materialism should be the context
for actions in all areas of life, which would make it a relatively absolute
factor (which is of course senseless): absolute, because no principles are
perceived or accepted beyond it, and of course relative, since the refusal of
principles is merely the result of inferior (materialistic) thinking and the
inability of this thinking to grasp them.
The difference between the era of Tradition and the Modern era is that in
Tradition the hierarchy of existence was truly reflected in social
organization (caste system) whereas in the age of modernity this hierarchy
is reversed. Thus the level of consciousness and the world view of slaves is
dominant today.
In all areas of life, this world view is in direct opposition to the royal, super
human consciousness, which in the era of Tradition was directly and
actively represented by the King (of the world). The king dominated by his
presence (passively active: no action was necessary), while the queen on
his side was a living symbol of power active in the manifest world.
Slaves have never had power. The (active) dominance of power was the
domain of the warrior caste. For warriors the King represented absolute
knowledge, thus the purpose of their life. Today, just like in the age of
Tradition, slaves dont dominate power. Their pursuit of power is senseless
and always reflects inferior and repulsive style elements. Dominance, thus
masculine potentials are so much out of range for them that instead of
dominating power, they are trying to identify with it. Not grasping the
concept of dominance they want to become the symbological queen and sit
2

on the kings throne.

They put each other on the throne and laugh at each other there. It is
comical, although this is a dark kind of humor, since it also involves the
usurpation of power. Today there are millions of such thrones (positions)
everywhere.
We have artificial organizations in all areas of life today: politics, military,
religious organizations, the corporate world, academia and criminal
organizations. Each deserves separate studies. Whats relevant here is that
they took over structures from the era of Tradition, but since they all lack
true fundamentals (they are based on illusions), these structures were first
empty shells (pseudo hierarchies where positions are rewarded based on
the amount of inferior (reflective) knowledge and manipulation), then the
structure itself has been changed, reflecting the very illusions that called
them forth: horizontal hierarchies (flat organizations), female principles
in leadership, etc. All reflect a materialistic world view that denies vertical
differentiation, promotes a gross and stupid equality and since it is unable
to define its own principle (matter), it completely lacks any foundation.
Only in artificial organizations is it possible that people occupy roles
without actualizing royal principles in themselves under a false sense of
leadership. Thus ranks have no significance, they dont represent plexuses
of power. Instead of actualizing the principles of power and dominance
within themselves, men (and women) remain powerless and increase the
effort of manipulation and accumulation of inferior knowledge.
The use of weaponry for example doesnt require super human
qualifications. It requires inferior education only that enables people with
no inner power whatsoever to operate them (as opposed to traditional
fighting systems like swordsmanship and archery, where the weapons were
the very symbols of the path to achieve super human states, which the
warriors were actively occupying and then transcending).
War is necessary when power is usurped. Its purpose is to reinstate the
dominance of the superior over the inferior in all areas of life.
Front lines
Open war
In the era of Tradition and the initial stages of history (external) war was a
focused effort, reflecting a focused, controlled, dominated mind, aligned to
supra rational consciousness. External war (small jihad) was the reflection
3

of the warriors efforts to eliminate involutive tendencies within himself

(great jihad) and to conquer principles by transcending the human state.
In the era of Tradition war was the domain of the best: nobility; hence the
respect of the fighting parties for each other: they were not in opposition
but fought for the same purpose on different sides. They were fighting an
inner war. External war provided them with opportunities to actualize many
potentials. In such a war there were no losers. The dominance of one didnt
mean defeat for the other. Only the superior was involved in war and the
victory of one was a revelation that he actualized the principle of One in
himself to a larger degree then the other. Thus Ones victory, whether or not
it ended up in the others physical death, provided the other with a chance
of transcendence. Both the death of the best of the dominated forces and
the victory of the dominating forces was glorious. The two achieved the
same objective. Victory was the divine manifestation of the superior, a
testimony that the victor had already transcended the human state. The one
who died, achieved it after death; in a way the next stage of his initiation
was triggered by the victor. The victor saw himself in the defeated, the
defeated saw himself in a more actualized state, in the victor. The two were
one.
As we follow history and get closer to the present day, the purpose of war
has been gradually changing, taking on more and more inferior forms.
First, with the disappearance of kings in total dominance, the royal
weapons of bows/arrows and swords were replaced by more inferior
weapons that no longer symbolized any path, they were mere technologies.
In the same time the purpose of war was becoming less spiritiual and more
material/economical. Naturally this meant that more people from the lower
castes were involved in war. In the last stage of history it is the masses that
are fighting for resources; there is no principle involved, the fighters are the
slaves, there are no warriors: war has become terrible, the symbol of total
annihilation: the individual in the mass, who identifies himself completely
with his body suffers complete elimination. Everybody loses, there are no
victors. Everybody involved serves negative tendencies. Nobody dominates
power. Various powers dominate everybody. The mass is powerless. Actual
war is just the open, intensified version the occult war that takes place in
everyday life. Individuals in the mass (slaves) are unable to exercise any
control. Theres no force of integration (leadership roles are also occupied
by slaves) so theres no vertical alignment towards principles. Soldiers are
disrespectful and cynical. They confuse power with technology. The
soldiers are excessively weak: no nerves, no mental strength and absolutely

no presence of intellect: rape, brutality and cruelty is wide spread. 1

Entertainment and promiscuity is part of war. In the very near future even
the slaves are going to be replaced by robots operated by male or female
operators (not soldiers).
Not only is the masculine principle not present, in a sense the war is against
the masculine principle itself.
Occult war
Negative tendencies are fighting against a few superior men (representing
principles) through the masses. Today everybody with an unshakable
materialistic world view is a mass individual and blindly follows/obeys
negative (anti traditional or modern) tendencies. The pseudo principles they
submit to are democracy, evolutionism, progressivism and a twisted
spirituality that perceives God outside of ones existence.
In the 1500s young samurais were advised to simply avoid places that are
not appropriate for their rank (pubs where low caste people gather, brothels,
etc.), behavior that is typical to inferior people (pursuing pleasures: visiting
whores, drinking) and to be always on high alert once they leave their
house.
The reason given for this was because they could at any time expect some
crazy individual to pick a fight with them (the symbology of which is that
the inferior would force the superior into situations that are unworthy of
him).
Today this advise still holds, although social organization according to the
caste system no longer exists. The number of superior people is very low
and one finds only places where inferior people gather, blindly pursuing
pleasures and fun, dedicated only to economical and material goals,
exercising the least amount of control possible.
The elite is not organized; every member of the elite is isolated. Every one
of them must fight individually. There is nowhere to go. Each one must
decide: fight or die. They must fight a royal fight, actualizing principles in
themselves, becoming superior, occupying their place in the true hierarchy.
The isolation is not physical. Superior people are born into an inferior
environment, grow up in an inferior culture, they are exposed to inferior
value systems, they are completely surrounded by the mass. The mass is a
brute aggressor whose only purpose is to disable the superior reaching his
1 on subtle rape see style elements of negative tendencies

goal. The mass has no other purpose, the force behind it is the absolute
anti-principle: it cant be reached, cant be realized, cant be actualized. It
doesnt even exist by itself: its existence depends on the principle of One it
is fighting against. This births senseless behavior, irrationalism, blind
mechanism, stupidity.
Orientation of the mass
Today we find the following elements that are typical of the mass:
Pleasure. It is fundamentally oriented towards the body, slightly oriented
towards the mind (not the intellect). The pursuit of pleasure is pervasive in
all areas of life. The illusion of the mass is that life is not worth living
without pleasure. They dont realize that the kind of pleasure they are
pursuing stems from the same roots as the pain and suffering they are
trying to avoid. The root is an unquenchable thirst for life (the cause of
their existence). Once pleasure is achieved, pain or suffering is
immanent. In the same token, once pain or suffering is experienced, the
pursuit of pleasure is intensified. The notion that peoples behavior is
driven by the avoidance of pain and the pursuit of pleasure was established
and this senseless behavior is truly valid for the masses today. Everything
people do to pursue pleasure is in the context of a material world view. All
their actions are the opposite of the actions of the superior. This difference
is perceivable by different style elements. Since pleasure is mostly material,
individuals in the mass are increasingly unable to differentiate between
types of pleasure. One aspect of materialism is exactly the lack of
differentiation. Emotional pain is cured by chocolate, alcohol, etc.
Examples outlined very briefly
Eating and drinking as perceived by the inferior
they eat and drink carbohydrates, glucose, lactose, calories, protein, fats,
alcohol, etc. focus is exclusively on the body. Also, eating and drinking
habits reflect emotional states and fluctuations. Eating and drinking may
become a compensation. Eating style is animalistic, greedy, voracious.
Prefer strong tastes for immediate benefits. The inferior consumes. Without
control. Blindly and in (mostly large) quantities.

Eating/drinking as perceived by the superior

enjoy the sight, smell and taste of tender meat, exciting vegetables, soft
butter, honey, hot, fresh bread, etc. they capture and fix the deep ecstasy of
wine with their soul, they fly with the volatile strength of spirits and they
intimately know the solid, calm quality in beer. This is not eating or
drinking. This is active knowledge. For them the food or the drink is a
symbol of the essence they already have, thus eating and drinking is a ritual
for the actualization of knowledge. Quantity is absent, only quality is
present.
Exercise inferior
To look good, be attractive, improve self esteem, improve physical health.
The self is subordinated to the body; it identifies with the body.
Exercise superior
Looking good is of no concern; the superior man is attractive to the
superior woman because of the principles/superior knowledge he actively
acquired and the dominance he exerts; the superior transcends the
individual self and identifies with I, the ruler of existence and
consciousness (self esteem is senseless); physical health and strength serves
the purpose of actualizing the absolute man (or woman) and it is the
consequence of appropriate actions of the I. The body serves the I.
Relaxation inferior
Analogous with stupor. In an acute lack of understanding and under the
aegis of an astounding lie, the mass uses names of traditional doctrines to
accomplish stupor: yoga, meditation, contemplation. They breathe deep to
calm the nerves and cope with stress, which they experience because they
dont understand the cause of existential crisis.
Calm superior
For the superior every area of life is a ritual, thus he lives in high
(intellectual) intensity; the behavioral style is calm, firm and unshakable.
On the path of actualizing the One in himself, he exercises meditation and
contemplation supreme. He exerts synthesized control over thoughts and
emotions. Striving to be detached from the body and transcend the
7

human state. Relaxation is senseless.

Talk inferior
Their talk reflects their thoughts. Uncontrolled, associative: one thing
reminds them of another thing, that of another, etc. their talk is chatter that
lacks strength. They also go with the flow, and find themselves in situations
that they dont understand; in fact they are not aware that they are in
situations. The subject of their talk is their life: Work, relationships,
kids, shopping, jokes, etc. infinitely boring and theres nothing to follow.
They either talk all the time or they dont talk at all. When they dont talk
its not a sign of control but that of a particular emotional state.
Communications superior
What do two people, who have absolute knowledge talk about? What does
a wise man and a mass man talk about? Nothing: it is senseless. The wise
knows the mass man, the mass man is not fit to comprehend knowledge
also, hes too busy talking. The superior makes statements when the time is
right. He doesnt get into arguments (discursive knowledge is inferior), the
purpose of statements from the superior is to trigger the evolution of
others, who are ready. Discussion is avoided. The superior doesnt want to
persuade.
Dance inferior
Part of fun, pleasure and even exercise. The scene has become the disco or
(mostly latin) dance clubs (the music played in clubs is just a feeble attempt
to organize the confusion in the composers mind). The style of dance in
discos is reflective of the mindset of the mass: mechanistic, robot like.
Isolated people, men and women moving the same way. Physical contact is
always sexually motivated. Dance (besides drinks of course) has become a
necessary step for sex between strangers and semi strangers. This mentality
is also valid in dance clubs. While these clubs maintain various forms of
dance, the motivation is to mate, to have fun or even to exercise.
Dance superior
Dance is a ritual that serves the purpose of the realization of the absolute
man and the absolute woman. The dancing parties become the symbols of
8

these absolute states. Dance is serious. The harmony between the

movements of the man and the movements of the woman is analogous with
sex. The force that drives these movements are sexual. Since the woman
sees in the man the symbol of the absolute man and vice versa, sexuality is
experienced in high intensity, but impersonally, on a supra individual plane.
Dance doesnt involve one improvised move (ritual choreography). This
way, there is no room for individual sexual motivation. Once individual
(inferior) sexual motivation is present, the magic of dance is gone.
Arts inferior
Industrial design, under the aegis of practicality.
Arts superior
similarly to eating and drinking, arts are the actualization of knowledge:
ritual.
Sex inferior
Pursued exclusively for the sake of pleasure. Each individual pursues
his/her own pleasure. The act is comparable to mutual masturbation (just
like their dancing style). On a lower level they even consider it fun.
Alcohol is almost always part of the experience. In fact the reason for
drinking alcohol is often exclusively to have sex. This is true even when it
is not immediately apparent: at pubs, company events. It is more apparent
in discos and whenever dance is involved. Attraction is based largely on
physical faculties. Sex dominates both men and women.
Sex superior
Similarly to dance, it is a ritual whereby both the man and the woman are
symbols of the absolute man and woman. The stages reflect the alchemical
operations of separation, preparation, burning, retraction to the root
(beginning), etc. If alcohol is used it is never to achieve a state of stupor
but to experience the analogue qualities of ecstasy, the lifting of spirit as a
preparation for sex, whereby higher states of consciousness is achieved.
The woman is in analogy with sex (taken to the extreme she is sexuality);
man dominates sex, he is never dominated by it.

Fun/entertainment inferior
Geared toward focusing the mind, to induce some level of negative
entropy; instead of the upward direction of the focus of the superior
however, the inferior focuses his attention downward.
3. Work and career
Artificial roles, where there is no room for the intellect (superiority); there
are rationalizations only, which are subordinated to inferior goals. People
are subordinated to functions and become mechanistic (robot like)
sometimes animalistic. The work environment was created specifically for
the masses and is mostly maintained by mass individuals. Just like
everywhere else, the pursuit of fun, pleasure, money and/or positions or
all of these is constant.
Work, fun and pleasure is mostly intertwined among the mass. The motto is
that if it feels good, it is good. Since the mass evaluates everything on a
physical level, they are ready to try anything under this motto, all the while,
due to their relative mindset, they are losing grasp on what feels good and
what doesnt: since they are on the lookout for new sources of pleasure,
they find less and less things that dont feel good.
Protocol in social situations:
First of all we must differentiate between the masses and people who dont
belong to the mass but are not (yet) superior either. These people are
potentially superior, but they are confused or not on a path to realization.
The presence of the superior means a force of integration for these people.
They start to realize latent potentials and perhaps organize around the
superior, gradually acquiring higher knowledge themselves and exhibiting
the superior style elements. When the caste system was alive, there were
three basic levels between the king and the slaves (warriors representing
controlled force, merchants, representing control over economics,
craftsmen, representing control over matterthe slaves were outside the
hierarchy, representing merely bodies who exercised no control by
themselves). In the time of Tradition superiority was reality and respect
from the less superior towards the more superior was authentic. Today
reality is defined by inferiority where respect has no foundations. Although
10

the degree of actualization of true, absolute principles in people is still

different, thus a hierarchy is potentially in place, the influence of negative
tendencies is so strong that these potentials maybe realized by the best only
while the rest falls victim to negative tendencies. Recognizing the style
elements of the mass and keep a distance is vital.
Thus the following protocols are not for the masses. It is for the actually
and the potentially superior.
We must also differentiate between protocol for men and women. Men are
warriors who can expect attacks from the mass from anywhere, any time.
Even though the mass directly target superior men, attacks may come
directly or indirectly. Indirect attacks come through their women. Women,
who belong to a superior man must be aware of their role in this scenario.
All women who are potentially superior (with or without a superior man)
are subject to attacks, but women who belong to a superior man experience
more of these.
Although naturally each person is different, they exhibit some similar
characteristics due to the same orientation of their focus; 2 in interactions
they are always courteous, collected and calm, their actions are void of
everything unnecessary. They dont make compromises in most of those
situations individuals the mass considers to be normal.
The most common of these situations are based on undifferentiation.
The mass cant differentiate, cant grasp the essence. This results in them
mixing everything up in life, which results in a total lack of clarity.
Examples:
mixing of men and women: there really is only physical difference between
them. On any other level feminine tendencies dominate. The term unisex
was born and they even start to look the same. They dont have a need for
differentiation. They share saunas, swimming pools, lie next to each other
on the beach, perform the same tasks in adjacent cubicles, drinking together
in pubs, men and women gossiping with each other, competing against
each other. Men dont look at women as women, and women dont look at
men as men. They look at body parts: both men and women see butts,
breasts, legs, arms, backs, stomachs etc. The focus of attention reflects a
fragmented world view. It is common that women and men start to look at
other womens or mens body parts, as well. In all situation theres mostly
indifference. This is of course no detachment. They are both dominated by
2

about the focus of the superior, see style elements of negative tendencies

11

sexuality. So when it comes to sex, it lacks real tension (tension comes

from differentiation). Partially due the constant lack of tension, but
increased promiscuity, learned homosexuality is rampant. The mass
propagates that everything is ok, as long as it doesnt hurt (physically)
others. Also, they do anything for fun and pleasure. This has become the
norm.
mixing of races. It starts also in the context of fun, pleasure and even
careers. Example: white (and other) people listening to North American
black music (not accidentally the strongest cultural influence today world
wide), dancing to black music, dressing like blacks, moving like blacks,
talking like blacks and acting like blacks. Then mixing with blacks. The
mass doesnt differentiate, so this is in a sick sense not a surprise.
Mixing perspectives: the mass thinks in relative terms. They are unable to
grasp metaphysical (absolute) contexts. Their thinking is feeble and
relative: they have no real context so they are always mixing what they
perceive to be a context with content. Science has become unscientific, the
truth has become relative and law has become unlawful.
Protocol for women who already belong to a man
One of the most fundamental context of the behavior of women is sex. Sex
is always present in social interactions. Within this context, sharing is a
fundamental part of womans nature. For women, the protocol is based on
control over sharing. The woman should not adjust her behavior to the
environment, but to her man only. The range of social interactions exceed
those that are directly, or almost directly (through 2-3 steps) linked to
sexuality. Here we only look at those that are directly related.
The difficulty is that the closer a woman is to the absolute state, the more
sexual she is and also, she possesses a quality which is typically described
as nice. Nice however has more than one aspect. A woman, whose life
depends on a superior man, is nice but distant. She exerts the kind of
happiness only women in love can. She smiles and laughs, but she is in
control and distant. People see that she is happy, smiling and polite. But
these visual style elements are the only ones she shares with others. She
doesnt share her dreams, fantasies with anybody but her man; she doesnt
talk about her body and of course, she doesnt talk about her sexuality even
to other women! She shares everything with her man only, who is the one
who insures this control.
Sharing information verbally or by writing is a very intimate thing. Sharing
information over drinks, away from others, is even more intimate. Only
primitive people think that sharing the body is what matters only.
12

Superior women know that everything they share with others, they take
away from their man, who they belong to completely: in this sense they are
worst than prostitutes, since prostitutes put on sale to the inferior which
already belongs to the inferior. A woman, intimately sharing information
with other men and even other women, puts on sale that, which belongs to
the superior. Naturally, even telling about this openly to the man after, is
not an excuse for the act already done.).
Even inferior men feel this truth and this is why they are only jealous of
other men, if they are unknown to them (at the womens work, from their
past, etc.). This truth doesnt know social ranks: blue color workers or
bankers feel the same burning jealousy. If the woman is flirting with their
own friends, even if it is in front of their own eyes, they are not jealous,
they dont even notice. Inferior women often cheat on their husbands with
family friends. Only the most primitive men dont care who their women
share information with. This is because their view is so materialistic, that
they themselves identify with their body only, thus thats all they want from
the woman, as well. Since the woman, through her sexuality closely
identifies with her body, the more primitive the man, the more feminine he
is.
Women typically break the protocol of not sharing precisely because they
have a man. They make small compromises to comply with social norms
and they think that situations are innocent or they confuse the notion of
being intimately nice with being nice with a distance. Both inferior
men and women take advantage of this confusion by being indiscreet. In
fact when a woman experiences indiscretion it maybe an indication that she
has not kept a distance. Indiscretion is sneaky. Always hidden, it looks
innocent, humorous or nice or has an its OK undertone (especially when
drinking is involved; in fact drinking with a man automatically
invites/encourages the inferior mans indiscretions), especially if it comes
from people who are considered to be acquaintances. Today people know a
lot of people but these are not relationships, they have no foundations;
they are superficious and meaningless. Needless to say that any kind of
indiscretion coming from strangers (however small, nice, funny, etc. they
maybe) are unacceptable . To use the samurai analogy, indiscretion is
analogous with somebody crazy trying to pick a fight. If it already
happened (couldnt have been avoided by distance), it must be dealt with
swiftly and and for good, to make sure it will never happen again: it is time
to use the sword.
The range of indiscretions is wide. It could be questions about private life,
13

almost anything related to sexuality, invasion of privacy (contact at

inappropriate times), even talking about own life without being asked.
Today both the work place and public areas (bars, pubs, public transport,
etc.) is full of instances of indiscretions that most people dont give
attention to and walk by in a state of sleep. It could be as common as mass
emails sent to buddy lists, or innocent questions like what did you do last
night. This last one is interesting because the one whos asking is not even
aware of why it is indiscreet. What makes it indiscreet is the wrong answer,
that would imply sharing information. So the question set up, initiated the
circumstances for indiscretions. People in the mass are always curious.
Knowing is possessing. If they know the superior, they have a sense of
excitement, similar to the one the thief feels, because they feel they possess
them, in a sense steal part of them.
At some instances of indiscretion its enough to ignore the situation in other
cases taking a direct stance and using the sword is necessary. It is
important that the woman is aware of the situation, almost like in a state of
heightened awakeness, feeling that this is a war situation, carefully
controlling her actions. The presence of this control already creates a
distance. If the situation is clearly an intentional indiscretion, the woman
must flatly ask to stop it. The man the woman belongs to is always present
in the woman, even when he is physically not around. Typically this
presence, as a passive dominance, repels indiscretions coming from both
inferior women and men. When the woman keeps the distance towards
somebody who is not a mass member she does them a favour. The cool
distance makes them adjust their behavior. When she keeps her distance
from the mass she does what she must: active opposition to the mass, active
subordination to her man. The conscious act of subordination to her man
becomes sharply evident, if the inferior man, who commits the indiscretion
is above the woman in the pseudo hierarchy at work. In such instances the
woman openly subordinates (cuts off) all inferior, material considerations.
Superior women typically experience subtle indiscretions only, it rarely
happens that they face gross indiscretions, like concrete, direct sexual
proposals. These happen mostly to women who have no desire to keep a
distance and happily mix with anyone. Gross indiscretions are the result
of this pattern of mixing. From their point of view it is not even
indiscretion, but something men do. Gross indiscretions geared towards
the superior woman are grotesque and less dangerous than the subtle ones.
They are easy to notice and easy to deal with immediately. The subtle ones
have a more violent, bullying character: by using socially accepted
values, like niceness and friendliness, it forces the woman to take a
14

stand in small situations, taking a risk of coming across strange in the

eyes of the mass; for them however this is not a risk, because keeping a
distance means more than being friendly.
Protocol for women who dont belong to a man
The biggest challenge these women face is the lack of masculine principle
in the majority of men. Besides of course the control of sharing and
keeping a distance from the mass in general, adhering to the basics of
etiquette enables women to exhibit the appropriate style elements to attract
potentially or actually superior men and repel the mass men. With the
adherence to etiquette, they repel mass women as well. Even though
without men, the question of subordination to the superior applies to these
women as much as to those who belong to a man. Ideally they should
submit to the idea of the absolute man until the idea becomes an actuality
when meeting the man.
Important consideration is that a superior man who already has a woman
(or women) is always preferable to an inferior man.
Two more points must be addressed here: meeting the superior man and
sexuality. Both of these could trigger wrong compromises.
In traditional societies the caste system itself provided the solution for
meeting the right man. The authenticity of caste system was based on
active dominance of the superior. Belonging to a particular caste and being
born to a particular family set the conditions for finding the right man.
The notion of love was not distorted by modern sentimentalism and notions
of men serving his woman and his family, or that the woman grants
favours, or allows men certain things.
The woman experienced her existence in subordination to the man, who
exerted active (intellectual) dominance, which is synonymous with higher
(impersonal from the point of view that it is higher than the individual)
love.
Todays system has no authenticity. Both men and women are seeking
(sinking into) sentimentalism. Falling in love is a correct term to describe
the rather primitive physical love people confuse with the higher ideal.
Freed from the bonds of hierarchies, mass members, who are often
positioned no higher than on a regressive infantile level, freely decide
who to marry, who to date, who to have relationship with. The criteria is
often no more than a body part. In other cases it is social rank, which,
lacking any authenticity, is a negative image of true hierarchies of previous
15

eras, thus choosing a life mate becomes a mockery Tradition. It is typical

of women that they are trying to find men for those who dont have any yet
often with the specific intention, to make sure she gets enough, that she is
sexually satisfied. To increase the chances, they often look among men,
who they consider to be safe choices (e.g. unable to get women on their
own), and they either do introductions (better scenario) or set up a blind
dates for them. A blind date is an opportunity of checking each other out
and quickly decide: he/she looks good, or doesnt look good and how much
compromise one is willing to make, etc. This is in sharp contrast to
introductions even as recently as 100-150 years ago, when meetings had a
more ritualistic character: formal introductions in the presence of parents or
the public, controlled communications and a general sense of high tension.
If the arrangements produce no results, the woman gets a dildo for her
birthday, and the search continues, typically not for long. After accepting
the notion of you gotta have somebody, the woman will either go out to
get drunk and get laid, or provokes the indiscretion of somebody at work
by a little flirting, then accepts the dinner invitation, gets drunk and gets
laid, thereby establishing a relationship.
By nature women are controlled by sexuality. The circumstances today are
such, that the media specifically propagates that not only is it OK for
women to subordinate themselves to inferiority, like promiscuous men
(themselves controlled by sexuality, just like women), but seeking anything
higher than physical pleasure (which is just a small aspect of physical love)
is socially not acceptable or funny; this is again a typical slave mentality,
which directly attacks and undermines the superior.
Women represent sexuality, (superior) men represent control over sexuality.
By carrying the ideal man in herself, almost like being in love with him,
the woman exhibits certain style elements that draws the right man (at least
as close to the state of absolute man, as the woman is to the state of the
absolute woman) to her. This protocol applies only to superior women, not
most women. Once the right man finds her, hell take her. The style
elements of the right man are typically open and honest and enable the
woman to recognize superiority and distinctiveness: the actual man
replaces the ideal.
The superior woman without man applies the same protocol to all mass
men as women with men.

16

Protocol for superior men

The essence of the superior man is in opposition to the mass. On all levels
men must realize royal principles. On the highest level he is in complete
dominance, on a lower level he actively pursues dominance over powers,
and loyalty to the highest principle, on an even lower level control over his
life, typically as a family man (head of family) and loyalty to the superior;
all superior men are loyal, exhibit various degrees of detachment from what
is considered to be life by the mass (burning desires, thirst for becoming,
attachments). They are detached. They dont subordinate themselves to
anything inferior, including women. They are not dominated by sexuality
or substances (drink, food, drugs, etc.). The more the man has actualized
the principle of One in himself the more personal the war is for him. On the
highest level he sees the enemy, the cause of the negative tendencies in
himself. Eliminating the cause is the purpose of the war. On such a level
awareness extends to every moment. Mass individuals experience
important, defining moments in their life only occasionally: graduation,
important promotion, wedding, divorce, etc. Maybe 10 defining moments
in an average life. Maximum. Superior men experience at least this many
every day. Actualizing potentials is what makes up their life. An acute
ability to recognize the essence, to differentiate. To clarify and put things
into their place. Always purpose driven, they act from context. The
decisions they make are essential, contextual, not the result of analogy: the
result of synthesis. They consider the appropriate factors only; they
eliminate confusion. They maintain perfect communication. If they write or
read, it is for this purpose. They listen in context, from the point of view of
the truth. They avoid discussions, arguments, they dont want to persuade.
They make statements. This straight forwardness characterize all their
actions. The way they act is clear from distortions. They are not influenced
by attachments, sentimentalism or low level considerations. Their acts are
focused, pure and powerful. Since they actualize supra rational knowledge,
on the level of the causes of phenomena, their life is a ritual. Everything is
symbology including themselves and the roles they play. This includes their
relationship with a woman or women. Inferior women typically avoid
superior men. What makes a woman inferior is the drive to subordinate
themselves to the inferior. Women that are not completely mass women,
and of course superior women, feel attraction to superior men and a strong
desire to subordinate themselves to him (in most cases this is not based
purely on physical factors. Those are quickly becoming irrelevant). The
higher level the actualization of One in the man, the more women he
already possesses (potentially or actually). On the level of the king, all
17

women belong to him.3 They avoid situations that calls for subordination to
the inferior: women or inferior men. They are the symbol of One, royalty,
absolute man. Meditation and contemplation supreme is a daily practice.
Challenges are plentiful. Not making compromises is dangerous. Survival
is not possible without some adjustments. Situations may arise that their
presence activate latent potentials in men lower then them but who dont
belong to the mass. In such situations, even if the superior man is put in a
lower role in the artificial hierarchy, his dominance is still undeniable.
Today they must occupy positions of power even in this reverse hierarchy
so they can exert the kind of influence they must.
This is of course more than difficult but it maybe possible by staying both
inside and outside the system. Each man must have a plan to accomplish
this. They must avoid places of gross stupidity. Just being there is a
potential reason for corruption. They may experience direct attacks from
men putting them in situations, which are not natural (normally a superior
man should never meet a slave).

Source: http://www.cakravartin.com

3 the king is the active representation of One. This means that all men are his modalities and
through all men he actively possesses all women. He may claim any and all attached (in
actuality he never claims these) or unattached women. On a lower level (e.g. warrior) men
dont share women with other men. Since they are not controlled by sexuality, they can have
more women.

18