PSCI 6309 International Political Economy & International

Organizations
Fall 2006 – The University of Texas at Dallas
Wednesdays 2-4:45pm in GR 3.402

Professor Contact Information

Clint Peinhardt
clint.peinhardt@utdallas.edu
972-883-4955
Green Hall 3.524
Office Hours Thursday 1:30-3:30 pm and by appointment

Course Pre-requisites, Co-requisites, and/or Other Restrictions

All students in this course should have already taken PSCI 5301 – Proseminar in
Democratization, Globalization and International Relations. Additionally, those who have had
a research design course will be much better positioned for the research paper requirement.

Course Description
This research seminar simultaneously examines two of the three subfields of international
relations – international political economy and international organizations (NOT international
security). In their current incarnations, both arose in response to the theoretical limitations
of realism, and they overlap in many ways. Readings are selected to present both an
adequate background and a current perspective to particular research programs.

Student Learning Objectives/Outcomes

Since this is a research seminar, the primary purpose is to train students to contribute to
research programs in the fields of international political economy and international relations.
This involves knowing the literatures as they currently exist, developing critical perspectives
on those literatures, and finding opportunities for new contributions of original research.
Additionally, students are expected to communicate their ideas and, if applicable, findings, to
their fellow students in conference-style presentations and to develop better academic
writing skills through class assignments.

Required Textbooks and Materials

Keohane, R. 2005 (new edition)/1984 (original). After Hegemony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Pevehouse, J.C. 2005. Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and
Democratization. Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, Beth A. 1994. Who Adjusts? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vreeland, J. R. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge University Press.

Suggested Course Materials

Goldstein, J., M. Kahler, et al. 2001. Legalization and World Politics. MIT Press. (Under $10
via http://www.addall.com)

Course Syllabus Page 1

Assignments & Academic Calendar
Note: A few journals are abbreviated due to their proliferation in the following list.
IO=International Organization; AJPS=American Journal of Political Science; APSR=American
Political Science Review.

Week One: Introductions and Background – August 23

Keohane 1984 (see required books)
Rochester, J.M. 1986. “The Rise and Fall of International Organization as a Field of Study.”
IO 40(4): 777-813.

Week Two: Decentralized Cooperation and the Prisoner’s Dilemma – August 30

Axelrod, R. and R. Keohane. 1986. Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and
Institutions. Cooperation Under Anarchy. K. Oye. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University
Press: 226-254.
Grieco, Joseph. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation.” IO 43(3): 486-507.
Lipson, Charles. 1984. “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs.” World
Politics 37: 1-23.
Snidal, D. 1991. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” APSR 85:
701-726.
Downs, G., D. Rocke, et al. 1998. "Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism." IO 52(2): 397-
420.

Week Three: Trade, Domestic Political Cleavages and Domestic Institutions – Sept. 6
Conybeare, J. 1983. "Tariff protection in developed and developing countries: a cross-
sectional and longitudinal analysis." IO 37(3): 441-67.
Fordham, B. O. and T. J. McKeown. 2003. "Selection and Influence: Interest Groups and
Congressional Voting on Trade Policy." IO 57(3): 519-549.
Milner, H. and K. Kubota. 2005. "Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy
in Developing Countries." IO 59(1): 107-144.
Nielson, D. L.. 2003. "Supplying Trade Reform: Political Institutions and Liberalization in
Middle-Income Presidential Democracies." AJPS 47(3): 470-491.
Pincus, J. J. 1975. “Pressure Groups and the Pattern of Tariffs.” Journal of Political Economy
83(4): 757-778.
Schonhardt-Bailey, C. 1991. “Specific Factors, Capital Markets, Portfolio Diversification, and
Free Trade: Domestic Determinants of the Repeal of the Corn Laws.” World Politics
43(545-69).

Week Four: Trade and The WTO – Sept. 13

Busch, M. L. 2000. "Democracy, Consultation and the Paneling of Disputes Under GATT."
Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(4): 425-446.
Guzman, A. and B. Simmons. 2002. "To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of
Litigation and Settlement at the World Trade Organization." Journal of Legal Studies
31: S205-S235.
Allee (will be provided)
Rose, Andrew K. 2004. “Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade?” American
Economic Review 94(1): 98-114.
Goldstein, Judith, Doug Rivers, and Michael Tomz. 2005. “Institutions in International
Relations: Understanding the Effects of GATT and the WTO on World Trade.” Under
review at IO. (to be distributed in class).
Rosendorff, P. and H. Milner. 2001. “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions:
Uncertainty and Escape.” IO 54(4): 829-857.

Course Syllabus Page 2

Week Five: Hegemony, Trade and the International Monetary System – Sept. 20
Krasner, S. 1976. "State power and the structure of international trade." World Politics 28(3):
317-347.
Keohane, R. 1997. "Problematic Lucidity." World Politics 50(1): 150-70.
Eichengreen, Barry. 1989. “Hegemonic Stability Theories of the International Monetary
System.” In Can Nations Agree?. Eds. R. N. Cooper et al., pp. 255-89.
Lake, D. 1993. "Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or
Tattered Monarch with Potential?" International Studies Quarterly 37(4): 459-489.
Mansfield, E. 1998. “The Proliferation of Preferential Trading Arrangements.” Journal of
Conflict Resolution 42(5): 523-543.

Week Six: Financial Policy and Domestic Politics – Sept. 27

Simmons, B. 1994. Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the
Interwar Years, 1923-1939. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Week Seven: Financial Liberalization – Oct. 4

Cohen, B. 1996. "Phoenix risen: the resurrection of global finance." World Politics 48(2):
268-296.
Frieden, J. 1991. “Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World
of Global Finance.” IO 45(4): 425-451.
Leblang, D. A. 1997. "Domestic and systemic determinants of capital controls in the
developed and developing world." International Studies Quarterly 41(3): 435-54.
Quinn, D. and C. Inclan. 1997. “The Origins of Financial Openness: A Study of Current and
Capital Account Liberalization.” AJPS 41(3): 771-813.
Lukauskas, A. and S. Minushkin (2000). "Explaining styles of financial market opening in
Chile, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey." International Studies Quarterly 44: 695-
723.
Rodrik, D. 1998. Who needs capital-account convertibility? Should the IMF Pursue Capital
Account Convertibility? P. Kenen. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Week Eight: FDI/MNCs – Oct. 11

Fagre, N. and L. Wells. 1982. "Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments."
Journal of International Business Studies: 9-23.
Kobrin, S. 1987. "Testing the bargaining hypothesis in the manufacturing sector in
developing countries." IO 41(4): 609-638.
Minor, M. 1994. "The Demise of Expropriation as an Instrument of LDC Policy, 1980-1992."
Journal of International Business Studies: 177-188.
Ramamurti, R. 2001. "The Obsolescing `Bargaining Model'? MNC-Host Developing Country
Relations Revisited." Journal of International Business Studies 32(1): 23-39.
Aitken & Harrison 1999
Li, Q. and A. Resnick. 2003. "Reversal of Fortunes: Democracy, Property Rights and Foreign
Direct Investment Inflows in Developing Countries." IO 57(1): 1-37.
Jensen, N. 2003. "Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes
and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment." IO 57(3): 587-616.

Week Nine: IMF – Oct. 18

Vreeland, J. R. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge University Press.

Course Syllabus Page 3

Week Ten: Legalization and World Politics – Oct. 25
[These articles all appear in the book Legalization and World Politics (International
Organization Special Issues) by J. Goldstein, et al. and in IO 54(3).
Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., et al. “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics.” Pp. 385-400.
Abbott, K. and D. Snidal. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” Pp. 421-456.
Pick One of the Articles from Law and Economic Integration (Alter, Abbott, or Kahler).
Pick One of the Articles from Legalization in Three Issue Areas (Simmons, Goldstein & Martin,
or Lutz & Sikkink).
Finnemore, M. and S. Toope. 2001. “Alternatives to ‘Legalization’. And Kahler, Keohane
and Slaughter response. IO 55(3): 743-60.
Steinberg, R. 2002. “In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and
outcomes in the GATT/WTO.” IO 56(2): 339-74.

Oct. 30 – last day to withdraw from course with automatic “W”

Week Eleven: Democratization and International Organizations – Nov. 1

Pevehouse, J. Democracy from Above. Cambridge University Press. (see required books)

The final three classes – Nov. 8, 15, and 22 – will be reserved for student presentations.

Grading Policy

Devoted class participation is essential for this course’s success; as such, students’ final
grades will depend in large part (40%) on their preparation, participation in class discussion,
and general contribution to the course’s intellectual climate.

The remainder of the course grade will be comprised of two assignments – one short paper
and one research paper. The short paper (20%) should be a five to seven page critical
literature review with identification of a research question, initial hypotheses, and potential
data sources. The topics should be drawn from our readings, detailed above, or from special
permission of the instructor.

The longer paper (40%) can be a follow-up to that initial short paper, or can be a separate
research paper that either explores new theoretical ground or tests hypotheses already
existing in the literature. In either case, the paper should be an original contribution to the
research program, and it should be the quality expected at the highest level of political
science conferences.

Course & Instructor Policies

Each class will begin with a brief summary from each student of his or her thoughts and
impressions of the week’s readings. Following these initial remarks, one (pre-selected)
student will provide a 10-minute overview of the readings. At that point, the floor will be
opened to all students again.

Course Syllabus Page 4

Student Conduct & Discipline

The University of Texas System and The University of Texas at Dallas have rules and
regulations for the orderly and efficient conduct of their business. It is the responsibility of
each student and each student organization to be knowledgeable about the rules and
regulations which govern student conduct and activities. General information on student
conduct and discipline is contained in the UTD publication, A to Z Guide, which is provided to
all registered students each academic year.

The University of Texas at Dallas administers student discipline within the procedures of
recognized and established due process. Procedures are defined and described in the Rules
and Regulations, Board of Regents, The University of Texas System, Part 1, Chapter VI,
Section 3, and in Title V, Rules on Student Services and Activities of the university’s
Handbook of Operating Procedures. Copies of these rules and regulations are available to
students in the Office of the Dean of Students, where staff members are available to assist
students in interpreting the rules and regulations (SU 1.602, 972/883-6391).

A student at the university neither loses the rights nor escapes the responsibilities of
citizenship. He or she is expected to obey federal, state, and local laws as well as the
Regents’ Rules, university regulations, and administrative rules. Students are subject to
discipline for violating the standards of conduct whether such conduct takes place on or off
campus, or whether civil or criminal penalties are also imposed for such conduct.

Academic Integrity

The faculty expects from its students a high level of responsibility and academic honesty.
Because the value of an academic degree depends upon the absolute integrity of the work
done by the student for that degree, it is imperative that a student demonstrate a high
standard of individual honor in his or her scholastic work.

Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, statements, acts or omissions related to
applications for enrollment or the award of a degree, and/or the submission as one’s own
work or material that is not one’s own. As a general rule, scholastic dishonesty involves one
of the following acts: cheating, plagiarism, collusion and/or falsifying academic records.
Students suspected of academic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary proceedings.

Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers for other classes, and from any
other source is unacceptable and will be dealt with under the university’s policy on plagiarism
(see general catalog for details). This course will use the resources of turnitin.com, which
searches the web for possible plagiarism and is over 90% effective.

Email Use

The University of Texas at Dallas recognizes the value and efficiency of communication
between faculty/staff and students through electronic mail. At the same time, email raises
some issues concerning security and the identity of each individual in an email exchange.
The university encourages all official student email correspondence be sent only to a
student’s U.T. Dallas email address and that faculty and staff consider email from students
official only if it originates from a UTD student account. This allows the university to maintain
a high degree of confidence in the identity of all individual corresponding and the security of
the transmitted information. UTD furnishes each student with a free email account that is to
be used in all communication with university personnel. The Department of Information
Resources at U.T. Dallas provides a method for students to have their U.T. Dallas mail
forwarded to other accounts.

Course Syllabus Page 5

Withdrawal from Class

The administration of this institution has set deadlines for withdrawal of any college-level
courses. These dates and times are published in that semester's course catalog.
Administration procedures must be followed. It is the student's responsibility to handle
withdrawal requirements from any class. In other words, I cannot drop or withdraw any
student. You must do the proper paperwork to ensure that you will not receive a final grade of
"F" in a course if you choose not to attend the class once you are enrolled.

Student Grievance Procedures

Procedures for student grievances are found in Title V, Rules on Student Services and
Activities, of the university’s Handbook of Operating Procedures.

In attempting to resolve any student grievance regarding grades, evaluations, or other

fulfillments of academic responsibility, it is the obligation of the student first to make a
serious effort to resolve the matter with the instructor, supervisor, administrator, or
committee with whom the grievance originates (hereafter called “the respondent”). Individual
faculty members retain primary responsibility for assigning grades and evaluations. If the
matter cannot be resolved at that level, the grievance must be submitted in writing to the
respondent with a copy of the respondent’s School Dean. If the matter is not resolved by the
written response provided by the respondent, the student may submit a written appeal to the
School Dean. If the grievance is not resolved by the School Dean’s decision, the student may
make a written appeal to the Dean of Graduate or Undergraduate Education, and the deal will
appoint and convene an Academic Appeals Panel. The decision of the Academic Appeals
Panel is final. The results of the academic appeals process will be distributed to all involved
parties.

Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the Dean of
Students, where staff members are available to assist students in interpreting the rules and
regulations.

Incomplete Grade Policy

As per university policy, incomplete grades will be granted only for work unavoidably missed at
the semester’s end and only if 70% of the course work has been completed. An incomplete
grade must be resolved within eight (8) weeks from the first day of the subsequent long
semester. If the required work to complete the course and to remove the incomplete grade is
not submitted by the specified deadline, the incomplete grade is changed automatically to a
grade of F.

Disability Services

The goal of Disability Services is to provide students with disabilities educational

opportunities equal to those of their non-disabled peers. Disability Services is located in room
1.610 in the Student Union. Office hours are Monday and Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.;
Tuesday and Wednesday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.; and Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

The contact information for the Office of Disability Services is:

The University of Texas at Dallas, SU 22
PO Box 830688
Richardson, Texas 75083-0688
(972) 883-2098 (voice or TTY)

Essentially, the law requires that colleges and universities make those reasonable
adjustments necessary to eliminate discrimination on the basis of disability. For example, it

Course Syllabus Page 6

 may be necessary to remove classroom prohibitions against tape recorders or animals (in the
case of dog guides) for students who are blind. Occasionally an assignment requirement may
be substituted (for example, a research paper versus an oral presentation for a student who
is hearing impaired). Classes enrolled students with mobility impairments may have to be
rescheduled in accessible facilities. The college or university may need to provide special
services such as registration, note-taking, or mobility assistance.

It is the student’s responsibility to notify his or her professors of the need for such an
accommodation. Disability Services provides students with letters to present to faculty
members to verify that the student has a disability and needs accommodations. Individuals
requiring special accommodation should contact the professor after class or during office
hours.

Religious Holy Days

The University of Texas at Dallas will excuse a student from class or other required activities
for the travel to and observance of a religious holy day for a religion whose places of worship
are exempt from property tax under Section 11.20, Tax Code, Texas Code Annotated.

The student is encouraged to notify the instructor or activity sponsor as soon as possible
regarding the absence, preferably in advance of the assignment. The student, so excused,
will be allowed to take the exam or complete the assignment within a reasonable time after
the absence: a period equal to the length of the absence, up to a maximum of one week. A
student who notifies the instructor and completes any missed exam or assignment may not
be penalized for the absence. A student who fails to complete the exam or assignment within
the prescribed period may receive a failing grade for that exam or assignment.

If a student or an instructor disagrees about the nature of the absence [i.e., for the purpose of
observing a religious holy day] or if there is similar disagreement about whether the student
has been given a reasonable time to complete any missed assignments or examinations,
either the student or the instructor may request a ruling from the chief executive officer of the
institution, or his or her designee. The chief executive officer or designee must take into
account the legislative intent of TEC 51.911(b), and the student and instructor will abide by
the decision of the chief executive officer or designee.

These descriptions and timelines are subject to change at the discretion of the Professor.

Course Syllabus Page 7