Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Rationale for funding the first domestic family planning programs in the
1960s was closely intertwined with the War on Poverty eras notion of
expanding economic opportunities for the poor.
Subsidizing contraception through family planning programs would promote
opportunities for disadvantaged women, who do not want more children
than do families with higher incomes but do not have the information of the
resources to plan their families effectively according to their own desires.
Programs would promote the opportunities of the next generation and thus
advance broader and longer-term economic prosperity.
less than fie dollars invested in population control is worth a hundred
dollars invested in economic growth
o dubious calculation?
o Easier to increase income per capita by reducing the denominator
than by increasing the numerator.
Family planning programs may influence national income directly over the
longer term
State repeals ban on contraceptive sales, increases in federal funding for
family planning programs are associated with large and persistent
improvements in the material living circumstances of the affected children as
adults.
Children conceived in areas with greater legal or financial access to family
planning went on to live in higher-earning households as adults than did
children conceived in the same areas whose mothers had less access to
family planning.
Both increasing legal access and increasing financial access to the Pill are
associated with a 2 or 3% increase in family income over all adults in the
affected cohorts.
Income gains reflects increases in childrens educational attainment
Children in smaller and higher-quality classes decrease chance of dropout.
Earnings gains reflect a tremendous increase in educational attainment.
An early life intervention generally supports their importance for human
capital and health investments early in life, but the mechanisms for these
effects remain largely elusive.
Mechanisms underlying the relationship between family planning and longrun outcomes remain unclear. Family planning programs do to provide
educational resources directly, nor do they teach parenting.
Family planning policies are similar as they increase parents economic
resources and time available per child, both of which may facilitate childrens
development and complement subsequent educational and health
investments in a dynamic manner.
Family planning may be much cheaper than many other interventions to
increase educational attainment.
Result suggest that family planning programs may provide a cost-effective
strategy for promoting opportunities and the longer-term prosperity
envisioned by their early proponents.