Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
248
Field Examples
This section discusses four field examples that were used to develop the interpretation technique. None of the interpretations were
performed in real time.
Rotating-Friction-Factor Field Example. Track 5 of Fig. 1 is a
log of the rotating friction factor ("fric") for the 12.25-in.
[31.12-cm] hole section of a well drilled onshore in the U.K. Surface and downhole measurements of WOB and torque are plotted
in Tracks 1 through 4. The log shows data from sections of the
hole where rotary BRA's were used and values of surface torque
were available. Over the interval from 2,632 to 3,652 ft [802 to
1113 m], fric was not calculated because downhole motors were
used and the drillstring was not rotated (no surface torque).
SPE Drilling Engineering, September 1988
10000
75.00
.,
"
(
,
TOOLFACE
MODE
I
1'3-
~
{
\
~
~
(10~
II
I
,
"
!,
--+
r~
,
,
22.1
D
J-t
""
S
95
0.00
I
'-
-2500
LOST
2500
2"
-41.4
CIRCULATION
-5000
!
~
-7500
LICOAL
+-....::..D..;..P;,-.--,_.---_-.-_H_._W,-.D_.P_.----,.-_..-_--',_D._C_,-,
00
500 0
1000.0
1500.0
79.3
10.2
Fric is relatively constant over the 12.25-in. [31. 12-cm] hole section with the exception of two anomalies at 2,572 and 3,900 ft [784
and 1189 m]. At 2,572 ft [784 m], fric becomes erratic and increases to 0.5. This increase in friction is associated with drilling
a permeable sandstone section. Circulation was lost in this sandstone because of a high differential pressure between the wellbore
and the formation that caused an increase in friction both below
(high downhole torque) and above the MWD (high fric). One possible explanation for the high and erratic fric values is a stick/slip
phenomenon, which occurs when the string is differentially stuck
and is then freed by a high torque.
At 3,900 ft [1189 m], the friction factor increased to 0.5. This
increase was associated with drilling a coal seam. The surface WOB
in the coal was increased from 50,000 to more than 70,000 Ibf [222
to 311 leN] to try to maintain the build rate. The high friction factor
over this section corresponds with this marked increase in WOB.
Fig. 2 plots the tension profiles for the drillstring at 3,842 and 3,902
ft [1171 and 1189 m]. The tension profile at 3,842 ft [1171 m] indicates that the neutral point is located near the bottom of the
heavyweight drillpipe. The tension at the bottom of the heavyweight
pipe is -9,500 Ibf [-42.3 leN]. At 3,902 ft [1189 m], the neutral
point is much higher up the heavyweight pipe because of the large
increase in WOB. The tension at the bottom of the heavyweight
pipe is -41,400 Ibf [184 leN]. With the equations published by
Dawson and Paslay, 8 the buckling load of heavyweight pipe in
these particular conditions was computed to be 39,000 Ibf [173 leN].
The marked increase in drillstring friction at 3,900 ft [1189 m] is
therefore attributed to buckling of the pipe as a result of excessive
WOB.
This example clearly shows that fric is insensitive to changes in
hole angle, lithology, BRA design, and normal changes in WOB.
A sharp increase in fric is a warning sign of a drilling problem.
In this example, potential differential sticking and pipe failure caused
by excessive buckling could be detected.
Sliding-Friction-Factor Field Example. Fig. 3 is a log of drag
for a section of the 12.25-in. [31.12-cm] hole for a well drilled
offshore Spain. The scale is larger than in the preceding example
because we are interested in drilling details. The sliding friction
during drilling is a normalization of the WOB losses with respect
to hole geometry, WOB, and BRA design. Drag is < 10% when
the string is rotating (WOB transmission is facilitated by the rotation)
and larger (20 to 40%) when a turbine or downhole motor is used
without rotation.
SPE Drilling Engineering, September 1988
50 00
22.0
INCL(de;l
~ ~
J\
\ ~
r '~
SWOB
2000.0
2500.0
3000 0
3500.0
4000 C
DEPTH (tt)
[!]
~
Over this section of the well, the hole inclination decreased from
55 to 52 0 [0.96 to 0.91 rad]. A top-drive system was used to rotate
the drillstring, and connections were made at about every 93 ft
[28 m]. The friction factor decreased after connections, probably
as a result of the BRA' 'wiping clean" the hole while connections.
At 5,690 ft [1734 m], a wiper trip was made to the casing shoe.
As the entire openhole section was' 'wiped clean," the sliding friction was halved. This effect was more pronounced at 6,104 ft [1860
m], where the string was pulled out of the hole. On returning to
bottom, the sliding friction was nearly zero-i.e., all the weight
applied at the surface reached the bit. The log also shows the effect
of removing cuttings from the annulus on the sliding friction. At
5,464 and 5,708 ft [1665 and 1740 m], the hole was circulated clean
while the bit was off-bottom. In both of these cases, drag showed
a marked decrease.
The example shows how to quantify the benefits of a circulation
or wiper trip. The wiper trip halved the friction factor, but its effect
was lost after three connections. A factor of 0.05 corresponds to
a loss of 4,000 Ibf [17.8 leN] from a total of 25,000 Ibf [111 leN]
in this particular case. The rotating friction (not shown) has a profile similar to that of the sliding friction, but changes were less
pronounced. At this stage, we do not have sufficient expertise to
know whether the level of sliding friction was abnormal or what
level is considered safe.
Dimensionless-Torque Field Example. Track 4 of Fig. 4 is a log
of dimensionless MWD torque, TD , for two sequential 12.25-in.
[31. 12-cm] polycrystalline-diamond-compact (PDC) bit runs drilled
offshore Spain. Downhole measurements of WOB and torque are
plotted in Tracks 1 and 2, respectively. The apparent formation
strength [FORS(f)] is plotted in Track 3. FORS(f) is proportional
to downhole weight on bit (DWOB) times rotary rate divided by
rate of penetration (ROP) and is expressed in units of stress.
Over the interval from 6,200 to 6,415 ft [1890 to 1955 m], TD
is relatively constant, ranging from 0.18 to 0.23. At 6,350 ft [1935
m] the WOB is increased to try to maintain the ROP [the ROP was
low, as shown by a high FORS(f)]. This increase in WOB is not
accompanied by an equivalent increase in torque (TD decreases)
or ROP [FORS(f) stays the same]. This is attributed to stabilizers
below the MWD tool rotating on ledges, thus preventing transfer
of weight to the bit (this would only be seen in the friction factors
if a stabilizer above the MWD happens to dig at the same point).
At 6,415 ft [1955 m], the BRA was changed. The next bit run
was drilled with the same kind of PDC bit and a steerable downhole
249
DRAG (%)
a
(J1
~ONNECTION
~.~
S-
;:
(-,
r~
~
~
(J1
~
>
r
'~
,
lIT/FACE
MODE
1:
,~-~
~~
2~
!~
"
~~-
"''-."
'"-- _c"
'?
en
en
:<;:
:~~
l,
~~
(J1
(J1
;.
gL
!CIRCULATE
OFF BOTTOM
='
"?-
~.
'::.:=-
01
:::g;
"
g
t,
,~
?"'-.
g;
>.
en
en
en
en
DCS
'!-~
II
en
en
(J1
DTOR(10' Ib!)
IbI)
(degi100')
(:)
en
en
(10~
DWOB
RJo
(J1
{L
'~!TIF"'CE
______
MODE
~_
_I
T~~
=--- v=--~
3.7
COrSellO"-'-
-~STUCK
.._ _ _ _
rn
I
I
__. _ _ _ J
I
(J1
en
en
en
(J1
lJ
en
en
-.,
'"'"
i"'1
~
'-"
DRAG (%)
GR(CPS)
~r--~",,=~---' r--=~--rb~~--'r--_~-;;:o~~--,
CIRCULATE
OFF BOTTOM
i"'1
FRIC (%)
'I'WIPER TRIP
TO SHOE
SANDSTON
'-J
CLAVSTON
(J1
CD
en
en,
(J1
t.O
en
en
'
SALTI
ANHYDAI'T
ICONNECTION
SAl.T
~ONN.CTION
SALT
en
a
en
en
,CIRCULATE ..
IpULL OUT OF HOLE
en
en
en
250
motor. This enabled both rotary and toolface drilling with the same
BRA. When changes in hole direction were required, surface rotation of the pipe was stopped, the BHA oriented, and drilling resumed with only the downhole motor.
Over this bit run, values of TD vary widely from very small
(0.01,0.05) without string rotation to very large (0.7,0.9) when rotation resumes. High peaks in FORS(f) correspond with low values
of TD' A likely explanation is that some hindrance below the
MWD prevents the WOB measured at the sub to be transmitted
to the bit. Thus, both the normalized torque and ROP [inverse of
FORS(f)] are small when the string is not rotating. When the string
SPE Drilling Engineering, September 1988
-~---~
--"
- ---
~-
Number
--1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Name
-BIT
STB
DC
STB
MWD
STB
DC
STB
DC
HW
DP
DP
Grade
Length
(tt)
Body 00
(in.)
Weight
(Ibm/tt)
S
E
1.00
4.00
10.00
5.00
45.00
4.00
30.00
3.50
150.00
150.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
12.25
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
147.00
147.00
147.00
104.00
147.00
147.00
147.00
147.00
42.77
19.5
19.5
--
Body 10
~
3.00
3.00
3.00
5.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.28
4.28
Overall 00
(in.)
12.25
12.25
8.00
12.25
8.00
12.20
8.00
12.25
8.00
5.00
6.63
6.37
Number
--1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Name
-BIT
STB
DC
STB
MWD
STB
DC
DC
HW
DP
Grade
Length
(tt)
Body 00
(in.)
Weight
(Ibmlft)
2.45
5.93
7.15
5.93
43.56
5.93
7.15
7.15
451.65
5,000.00
12.25
8.00
8.06
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.06
8.06
5.00
5.00
149.00
151.70
149.00
104.00
149.00
151.70
151.70
38.60
19.50
--
Body 10
~
2.88
2.88
2.88
5.00
2.88
2.88
2.88
3.25
4.28
Overall 00
(in.)
12.25
12.25
8.06
12.25
8.00
12.25
8.06
8.06
5.50
6.37
Grade
(tt)
Body 00
(in.)
Weight
(Ibmlft)
1.57
34.57
6.75
8.95
34.57
43.13
5.41
91.21
34.57
150.00
5,000.00
12.25
9.50
9.00
8.06
9.50
8.00
8.25
8.00
9.50
5.00
5.00
219.10
183.80
151.70
219.10
104.20
161.90
149.00
219.10
42.77
38.60
2.88
3.50
2.88
2.88
5.00
2.75
2.88
2.88
3.25
4.28
Length
Number
Name
---
--
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
BIT
SDM
STB
DC
DC
MWD
STB
DC
DC
HW
DP
--
Body 10
Overall 00
(in.)
12.25
9.50
12.00
8.06
9.50
8.00
12.09
8.00
9.50
5.00
6.50
Conclusions
Real-time monitoring of friction can be used to detect the onset of
drilling problems in sufficient time to take remedial action and to
avoid getting stuck.
Three logs are used to monitor friction.
1. The rotating friction factor, fric, is used to evaluate the transfer of torque between the surface and the MWD tool.
2. The sliding friction factor, drag, is used to evaluate the transfer of WOB between the surface and the MWD tool.
3. The dimensionless torque, TD , monitors the section of drillstring below the MWD tool.
The logs quantify the benefits of such commonly used holeconditioning techniques as circulating and wiper trips.
Understanding of the effects of mud properties on the friction
factors is poor (especially in oil-based muds). More laboratory work
and field data analysis are required before values of' 'normal" friction and threshold values for abnormal friction can be determined.
Relative changes in the friction factors can be used to interpret drilling problems until then.
Future enhancements of the technique presented will take into
account the stiffness of the BHA when the MWD is close to the
bit. A two-pronged approach will be adopted: a simplified method
to compute the side forces on the bit, stabilizers, and other BHA
elements touching the wellbore has already been developed, and
a measurement of bending moments in the MWD will soon be commercial. This measurement will help determine such unknown parameters as hole size and rock anisotropy.
Acknowledgments
We thank BP Exploration Co. Ltd., Britoil, and Hispanoil, who
allowed us the use of the data presented in this paper.
References
Jo.han~sik,
252
7. Lesage, M.L.G. et at.: "An Analysis of Bit Bearing Failures With Field
and Laboratory Data," paper SPE 17187 presented at the 1988
IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, Feb. 28-March 2.
8. Dawson, R. and Paslay, P.R.: "Drillpipe Buckling in Inclined Holes,"
JPT (Oct. 1984) 1734-38.
Appendix
For the purpose of this paper, no distinction is made between the
pipe and the BHA.
The same equations are applied to successive elements of the drillstring. An element is defined as a length of string where the follo~ing are constant: pipe cross-sectional area, steel-pipe grading,
build. a~d turn rates, and hole type (either open or cased). An upper lImIt to the element length (100 ft [30 m]) is imposed. Field
data force an element change at every survey, at the casing shoe,
and at changes in pipe OD and grade. The number of elements varies
typically between 50 and 300.
Care must be taken in entering the surveys: two surveys 10 ft
[3 m] apart, obtained within an accuracy of 0.1 [0.0017 rad] on
each measurement in a 45 [0.79-rad] well, can create an anomalous
dogleg of 1.2/100 ft [0.02 x 10- 3 rad/m]. Two friction factors
computed for the same well, one with surveys every 10 ft [3 m],
the other one every 30 ft [9 m], can differ by a factor of >2. To
solve the problem associated with survey accuracy, we use only
surveys that are > 20 ft [> 6 m] apart. This effect also makes it
difficult to compare planning friction coefficients to field-measured
ones. The number of kickoff points, buildups, etc., in a planned
well rarely exceeds 10, so a routine to generate random numbers
within the accuracy of the direction and inclination tool is required. *
'Personal communication with A.D. Beckett, Amoco Production Co. (1986).
rad
m
cm
N
Nm
kg/m
kPa
SPEDE
Original SPE manuscript received for review March 15, 1987. Paper accepted for publication
Feb. 12, 1986. Revised manuscript received May 9,1988. Paper (SPE 16114) first presented
at the 1987 SPElIADC Drilling Conference held in New Orleans, March 15-18.