Department of Mechanical, Automotive and Manufacturing Engineering

(Proposed) Coursework Brief

Module Title
Computer-aided Engineering

Cohort (Sept/Jan)

Sept

Coursework No. / Title

CW1
Lecturer
Estimated Time (hrs)
10

Coursework
type:
Portfolio

Extensions allowed:
By application.

Module Code
M10MAE
Hand out date:
10/10/14
Due date:
03/11/14
% of Module Mark
40%

Submission arrangements:
rd

Submit through Turnitin in module Moodle site by 2355hrs on Monday 3 November 2014

Task andQuality Mark distribution:

Please see marking rubric attached.

Module Learning Outcomes Assessed:

1. Use surface and solid modelling software to develop 3-D component geometry.
5. Understand the breadth of complex engineering simulations.
Employability Skills Covered:
Planning and organising, Self-management

For group work, individual grades will be determined as follows (tick)

peer assessment
tutor assessment
observed engagement
presentation/viva

log book
individual elements

Academic Conduct Statement:

The task requires an individual effort and virtually all work to be original. Where inclusions are taken from
other sources, appropriate referencing must be used.
Mark allocation guidelines
0-39
40-49
Work mainly
Most elements
incomplete and completed;
/or weaknesses weaknesses
in most areas
outweigh
strengths

50-59
Most
elements are
strong, minor
weaknesses

60-69
Strengths in all
elements

70+
Most work
exceeds the
standard
expected

80+
All work
substantially
exceeds the
standard
expected

Feedback arrangement:
Feedback will be sent via email against the marking rubric (attached).
July 2014

M10MAE Computer Aided Engineering

Martin Lander aa5158@coventry.ac.uk
Atul Gupta ab3854@coventry.ac.uk
Project Title

Solid Assembly Element 1 40%

Project
Submission
Details

- A3 drawings word processed.

- 03/11/14.
- late submissions will receive a mark of 0%.

ADVANCED BRIEF

Your company - Pulleys Inc. - must modernise their current Product Range of items. They
produce this Adjustable Pulley using Imperial sizes and now need a METRIC version.
UNIQUE DIMENSIONS

Use the dimensions provided. Convert them to metric equivalents (eg 1 = 25.4mm).
Round all dimensions up or down to nearest 0.5mm.
Each student has a unique set of dimensions that we have calculated based on your SID
number (see pages 4-5). Use these to complete the missing dimensions in the drawing.
WHAT YOU SHOULD DO

Model all components, assemble them and complete draft drawings of ALL component
parts using the variable dimensions you have been given, use your ENGINEERING
KNOWLEDGE to add detail at your own discretion.
a) Each component MUST be modeled in a separate part file.
b) Add all files to a single ZIP file.
c) ENSURE YOUR FILES OPEN ON A UNI PC, IF I CANT OPEN ALL FILES, THEY
WILL SIMPLY BE MARKED A ZERO.
d) Produce a PDF draft drawing (Using save as in Catia) for EVERY component.
e) Combine documents in a single PDF (BINDER) to submit online.
Submit only your own work. Plagiarism and will cause you to fail the coursework.
Data saved with every CATIA part that tells me who the author is, I will know anyway.
ITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED ONLINE
One ZIP file containing;
Folder 1 CAT Parts. Contains ALL component parts and assembly. DO NOT save parts
and assemblies into different folders for submission, this may cause them not to open
correctly. Each component must have a unique Part Number (at your discretion).
Folder 2 Binder of PDF Drawings.
1. Fully dimensioned 3rd angle orthographic of all components with correct border.2. Oneoff exploded drawing and one-off assembly drawing following the guidance given in
appropriate literature (eg Library).

Martin Lander 14

Solids Assembly and Drafting

Measurements in inches ()
Drawing not to scale
Figure 1 -Stillson Wrench
Martin Lander 14

Solids Assembly and Drafting

Firstname

Lastname

Email

SID

Afroze Ahamed
Tofik
Oluwatosin Samuel
Azad
Shi
Yunsheng
Karthikeyan
Satish
Swapnil
Suyash
Guraz
Chen
Peihong
Hanchen
Guo
Rui
Marcel
Kerem
Aawishkar
Phakhinphak
John
Ayodele Olukayode
Yangyu
Imad Ali Hussein
Abdul Khayoom
Raphael Frederic
Abdulsamad
YunLong
Sri
Jiuyi
Pradeep
Siyuan
Pramit Madan
Chandramouli
Yu
Zhentao
Jingfan
Peter Afahaeme
Mohammed
Nitin
Elvig
Siddhesh
Mohamed
Mujahed
Muzammil Ali
Ramina
Phakhawat
Amruth
Raj
Jacques
Jinling
Ang
Antai
Yaguang
Zhengda
Cheng
Menghui
Merwyn
Fangzhou
Wei
Yingdong
Yue
Anish
Christos
Venkata
Sathish
Chukwunonso
Akash
Jirapong

AEJAZ AHMED
Algbaili
AWORANTI
Awrahman
Bai
Bai
Balaraman
Baskar
Bhosle
Bhutada
Buhariwala
CAI
Cai
Chang
Chen
CHEN
Collier
Dedebayraktar
DHARMADHIKARI
Disakul
Durairaj
EKUNDAYO
Fan
GHIYADI
GHOUSE MOHAMED
GIRAUD
Gobir
GU
Gunasekaran
Guo
GURRALA
HAN
HATE
Hegde
Hong
HU
Huang
IKARA
Imthiaz Ahamed
Jagadish
JOHN JOTHI PRAKASH
Keluskar
Keshlaf
Khan
KHAN
Kilduse
Koocharoenprasit
Kulkarni
KUMAR
LAU
Leng
Li
LI
LI
Li
Lian
Liao
Lobo
Lu
Lu
Lyu
MA
MAJUMDAR
MALEROS
Mallela
Mari
Mgbeafulu
Molkeri
MUNGNIMIT

aejazaha@coventry.ac.uk
algbailt@coventry.ac.uk
aworanto@coventry.ac.uk
awrahmaa@coventry.ac.uk
bais2@coventry.ac.uk
baiy6@coventry.ac.uk
balaramk@coventry.ac.uk
baskars@coventry.ac.uk
bhosles@coventry.ac.uk
bhutadas@coventry.ac.uk
buhariwg@coventry.ac.uk
caic4@coventry.ac.uk
caip@coventry.ac.uk
changh6@coventry.ac.uk
cheng8@coventry.ac.uk
chenr13@coventry.ac.uk
collie14@coventry.ac.uk
dedebayk@coventry.ac.uk
dharmada@coventry.ac.uk
disakulp@coventry.ac.uk
durairaj@coventry.ac.uk
ekundaya@coventry.ac.uk
fany10@coventry.ac.uk
ghiyadii@coventry.ac.uk
ghousema@coventry.ac.uk
giraudr@coventry.ac.uk
gobira@coventry.ac.uk
guy11@coventry.ac.uk
gunasek2@coventry.ac.uk
guoj10@coventry.ac.uk
gurralap@coventry.ac.uk
hans3@coventry.ac.uk
hatep@coventry.ac.uk
hegdec@coventry.ac.uk
hongy6@coventry.ac.uk
huz6@coventry.ac.uk
huangj30@coventry.ac.uk
ikarap@coventry.ac.uk
imthiazm@coventry.ac.uk
nitinjan@coventry.ac.uk
johnjote@coventry.ac.uk
keluskas@coventry.ac.uk
keshlafm@coventry.ac.uk
mujahedm@coventry.ac.uk
khanm152@coventry.ac.uk
kilduser@coventry.ac.uk
koocharp@coventry.ac.uk
kulkar18@coventry.ac.uk
kumarr32@coventry.ac.uk
lauj2@coventry.ac.uk
lengj@coventry.ac.uk
lia10@coventry.ac.uk
lia11@coventry.ac.uk
liy38@coventry.ac.uk
liz35@coventry.ac.uk
lianc@coventry.ac.uk
liaom2@coventry.ac.uk
lobom2@coventry.ac.uk
luf5@coventry.ac.uk
luw2@coventry.ac.uk
lyuy@coventry.ac.uk
may17@coventry.ac.uk
majumdaa@coventry.ac.uk
malerosc@coventry.ac.uk
mallelav@coventry.ac.uk
maris@coventry.ac.uk
mgbeafuc@coventry.ac.uk
molkeria@coventry.ac.uk
mungnimj@coventry.ac.uk

5169302
5140312
5595361
5190937
5601743
5416387
5898169
5245145
5378487
5587481
5397134
5897047
5486003
4705967
5408795
5352890
5964017
5187270
5954203
5415335
5959530
5208195
5886638
5140356
5864500
6022309
5440463
5502093
5332777
5445756
5365188
4855985
5213487
5860384
5429572
5433683
5258352
5234851
5425242
5938030
5557646
5417638
5293803
4928946
5393583
6032261
5812501
5431922
6003157
3860528
5349199
5407835
5963098
3493441
5369991
5274857
5529540
5946792
5868449
5414305
5748118
5689947
5917127
5882777
5918663
5925568
5889411
5866087
5437625

Variable
4-5.6 4-5.6 3.3-6 1.2-2
A
B
C
D
4.0
5.0
3.2
1.2
4.2
5.2
3.4
1.4
4.4
5.4
3.6
1.6
4.6
5.6
3.8
1.8
4.8
4.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
4.2
4.2
1.2
5.2
4.4
4.4
1.4
5.4
4.6
4.6
1.6
5.6
4.8
4.8
1.8
4.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
4.2
5.2
5.2
1.2
4.4
5.4
5.4
1.4
4.6
5.6
5.6
1.6
4.4
5.4
5.8
1.8
4.6
5.6
6.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
3.2
1.2
4.2
5.2
3.4
1.4
4.4
5.4
3.6
1.6
4.6
5.6
3.8
1.8
4.8
4.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
4.2
4.2
1.2
5.2
4.4
4.4
1.4
5.4
4.6
4.6
1.6
5.6
4.8
4.8
1.8
4.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
4.2
5.2
5.2
1.2
4.4
5.4
5.4
1.4
4.6
5.6
5.6
1.6
4.4
5.4
5.8
1.8
4.6
5.6
6.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
3.2
1.2
4.2
5.2
3.4
1.4
4.4
5.4
3.6
1.6
4.6
5.6
3.8
1.8
4.8
4.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
4.2
4.2
1.2
5.2
4.4
4.4
1.4
5.4
4.6
4.6
1.6
5.6
4.8
4.8
1.8
4.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
4.2
5.2
5.2
1.2
4.4
5.4
5.4
1.4
4.6
5.6
5.6
1.6
4.4
5.4
5.8
1.8
4.6
5.6
6.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
3.2
1.2
4.2
5.2
3.4
1.4
4.4
5.4
3.6
1.6
4.6
5.6
3.8
1.8
4.8
4.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
4.2
4.2
1.2
5.2
4.4
4.4
1.4
5.4
4.6
4.6
1.6
5.6
4.8
4.8
1.8
4.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
4.2
5.2
5.2
1.2
4.4
5.4
5.4
1.4
4.6
5.6
5.6
1.6
4.4
5.4
5.8
1.8
4.6
5.6
6.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
3.2
1.2
4.2
5.2
3.4
1.4
4.4
5.4
3.6
1.6
4.6
5.6
3.8
1.8
4.8
4.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
4.2
4.2
1.2
5.2
4.4
4.4
1.4
5.4
4.6
4.6
1.6
5.6
4.8
4.8
1.8

Rahul
Siyang
Ikechukwu Bismarck
Manoj
Vishal
Akshay Reddy
Alfred
John
Shaz
Mubarak
Shiva
Karthik
Swayam
Clement
Jerin
Ahmad B A
Ibrahim Olawale
Samuel Rajiv Sushanth
Mukut
Oladeji
Kavish
Prasanna
Mohammed Arsalan
Xiaoxuan
Imran
Harmeet
Saumya
Nuttapon
Ravi Shankar
Pablo
Akshay Manojkumar
Weimin
Bugra
Srijith Bangaru
Oommen
Pinghao
Pratik
Anoop
Vladimir
Fan
Jindong
Tianyao
Zhaoyi
Zhou
Yin
Gengrui
Jing
Kai
Leqi
Bowen
Jiafeng
Zhihuan
Dian
Tianyuan
Xinyu
Xiaofan
Xiaorui
Yang
Yao
Fengfeng
Liangwei
Haiwei

Narayanan
Ning
OWUNNA
PADAVALA
Panchal
PANDI
PHILIPS
Prinold
Rahath
RAHIMAN
Rajkumar
Rao
Ray
SAINTPIERRE
Saji Thomas
SALEM
SALLAUDEEN
SAMBARAPU
SARMA
Satope
SAXENA
Seetha Raman
SHAHID
Shi
Shihabudeen Rajela
Singh
Singh
Sintapanon
SIVAKUMAR
SMITH
SUKUMARAN
Sun
Tarazi
THIRUMALAI RAJ
Thomas
TU
Valera
Vellithiruthynhalil Ayyappan
Vladimirov
Wang
Wang
Wang
WANG
Xiao
Xu
Yang
YANG
YANG
YANG
Yi
YIN
Yu
Zeng
ZENG
Zhai
ZHANG
Zhang
Zhang
ZHANG
ZHU
Zhu
Zuo

naraya23@coventry.ac.uk
nings@coventry.ac.uk
owunnai@coventry.ac.uk
padavalm@coventry.ac.uk
panchalv@coventry.ac.uk
pandia@coventry.ac.uk
philipsa@coventry.ac.uk
prinold2@coventry.ac.uk
rahaths@coventry.ac.uk
rahimanm@coventry.ac.uk
rajkumas@coventry.ac.uk
raok@coventry.ac.uk
rays@coventry.ac.uk
saintpic@coventry.ac.uk
sajithoj@coventry.ac.uk
salema4@coventry.ac.uk
sallaudi@coventry.ac.uk
sambaras@coventry.ac.uk
sarmam@coventry.ac.uk
satopeo@coventry.ac.uk
saxenak@coventry.ac.uk
seetharp@coventry.ac.uk
shahidm5@coventry.ac.uk
shix7@coventry.ac.uk
shihabui@coventry.ac.uk
singhh35@coventry.ac.uk
singhs66@coventry.ac.uk
sintapan@coventry.ac.uk
sivakumr@coventry.ac.uk
smithp38@coventry.ac.uk
sukumar7@coventry.ac.uk
sunw9@coventry.ac.uk
tarazib@coventry.ac.uk
thirumas@coventry.ac.uk
thomaso4@coventry.ac.uk
tup@coventry.ac.uk
valerap@coventry.ac.uk
vellitha@coventry.ac.uk
vladimiv@coventry.ac.uk
wangf9@coventry.ac.uk
wangj69@coventry.ac.uk
wangt25@coventry.ac.uk
wangz68@coventry.ac.uk
xiaoz3@coventry.ac.uk
xuy36@coventry.ac.uk
yangg5@coventry.ac.uk
yangj14@coventry.ac.uk
yangk4@coventry.ac.uk
yangl7@coventry.ac.uk
yib@coventry.ac.uk
yinj2@coventry.ac.uk
yuz11@coventry.ac.uk
zengd@coventry.ac.uk
zengt3@coventry.ac.uk
zhaix2@coventry.ac.uk
zhangx52@coventry.ac.uk
zhangx59@coventry.ac.uk
zhangy56@coventry.ac.uk
zhangy70@coventry.ac.uk
zhuf4@coventry.ac.uk
zhul9@coventry.ac.uk
zuoh@coventry.ac.uk

5865644
5216662
4745239
5839450
5417225
5642698
5986617
4575636
5410008
5341137
5990164
5891377
5925786
6029250
5438079
5211863
5309551
5365133
5352834
5595372
5195596
5889444
3618066
5399035
5914621
5825475
6033338
5480377
5870198
6039824
6010410
5644474
6013880
5247183
3450743
4860635
5924608
5349292
5427187
3916869
5858613
5195873
5907081
5258592
5410019
5535574
6057068
5959921
3064078
5406735
5223899
6004132
5409552
6014991
5869745
5352100
5434015
3917729
4785752
5921652
4819323
5838316

4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.4
4.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.4
4.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.4
4.6
4.4
4.6
4.4
4.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.4
4.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
4.4

5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.4
5.6
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.4
5.6
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.4
5.6
5.4
5.6
5.4
5.6
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.4
5.6
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
4.0
4.2
5.4

5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
3.6

2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.6

MARKING RUBRIC / ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

CATIA parts (Components and Assemblies).

Family Name: Surname Email:Email_address SID:ID_number

%

0-40

41-50

51-60

61-70

70+

Section Mark converted

into %

Feedback from previous

year.

Complete set of
component
parts and ease
of opening part
file.

2.5%

A complete set of
component parts as
required and all items
possible to open from
Product assembly
file. All items must
be openable by the
university license of
Catia, any problems
experienced will
result in a reduced
mark in this section
and may have an
impact on successive
marks.
Good attention to
construction detail
with appropriate
sized Part-Tree with
appropriate tools
used. Some
components contain
data of appropriate
material detail.
Suitable
consideration of
dress-up tools
features used that
allude to
manufacturing
method appropriate
to this type of
assembly. No use of
Knowledgeware
items to allow for
quick updating and
editing of the product
in future. Appropriate
conversion of
dimensions to allow
for METRIC
construction with no
items clashing in the
assembled product
file.

A complete set of
component parts as
required and all items
possible to open from
Product assembly file.
All items must be
openable by the
university license of
Catia, any problems
experienced will
result in a reduced
mark in this section
and may have an
impact on successive
marks.
Very good attention to
construction detail
with appropriate sized
Part-Tree with
appropriate tools
used. All
components contain
data of appropriate
material detail.
Suitable
consideration of
dress-up tools
features used that
allude to
manufacturing
method appropriate to
this type of assembly.
Good use of
Knowledgeware items
to allow for quick
updating and editing
of the product in
future. Appropriate
conversion of
dimensions to allow
for METRIC
construction with no
items clashing in the
assembled product
file.

A complete set of
component parts as
required and all items
possible to open from
Product assembly file.
All items must be
openable by the
university license of
Catia, any problems
experienced will
result in a reduced
mark in this section
and may have an
impact on successive
marks.
Outstanding attention
to construction detail
with appropriate sized
Part-Tree with
appropriate tools
used. All
components contain
data of appropriate
material detail.
Excellent
consideration of
dress-up tools
features used that
allude to
manufacturing
method appropriate to
this type of assembly.
Excellent use of
Knowledgeware items
to allow for quick
updating and editing
of the product in
future. Appropriate
conversion of
dimensions to allow
for METRIC
construction with no
items clashing in the
assembled product
file.

Generally all of your

models opened without
a hitch, however some
of you renamed
components and hence
they would not work.

12.5%

A complete set of
component parts as
required and all items
possible to open from
Product assembly
file. All items must
be openable by the
university license of
Catia, any problems
experienced will
result in a reduced
mark in this section
and may have an
impact on successive
marks.
Little attention to
construction detail
with satisfactorily
sized Part-Tree.
Little or no
components contain
data of appropriate
material detail. Little
consideration of
dress-up tools
features used that
allude to
manufacturing
method. No use of
Knowledgeware.
some problems with
conversion of
dimensions.

M2__Complete

Logic of
construction
and intelligence
of build.

A complete set of
component parts as
required and all items
possible to open from
Product assembly
file. All items must
be openable by the
university license of
Catia, any problems
experienced will
result in a reduced
mark in this section
and may have an
impact on successive
marks.
Poor attention to
construction detail
with poor Part-Tree.
Little or no
components contain
data of appropriate
material detail. Little
or no consideration of
dress-up tools and
features used that
allude to
manufacturing
method. No use of
Knowledgeware.
Clear problems with
conversion of
dimensions.

M1__Logic

Most people lost marks

here as a result of not
using appropriate metric
conversions ie. 1 inch =
25.4mm and the
APPROPRIATE
conversion would be
25mm or 25.5mm or
even 26mm. Three
people in the class
actually made an good
conversion and as a
result they received a 7+
score, the remainder of
you are probably
somewhere around 6.8,
regardless of how good
your model was. Look
up task compliance.

Drawing package

Quality of parts
from /
intelligence of
build.

10

Poor knowledge of
Sketcher workbench
with majority of
sketches not isoconstrained.
Erroneous sketches
in Part-Tree and
items requiring
update. No use of
Knowledgeware
items to allow for
quick updating and
editing of the product
in future.

Border and
Frame
correctness to
BS8888 and
information
presented in
border
appropriate.

10

Poor level of detail

containing missing
mandatory data
correct to BS8888.
Majority of title block
construction from
stock Catia
templates. Frame
border and title block
poorly positioned on
page with little
consideration for
binding.
Discrepancies in
selection of font size
and type. Poor use
of discretionary data
to with some data
fields empty. Poor
construction of 3rd
angle projection
symbol.

Satisfactory
knowledge of
Sketcher workbench
with majority of
sketches isoconstrained. Some
erroneous sketches
in Part-Tree and
some items requiring
update. No use of
Knowledgeware
items to allow for
quick updating and
editing of the product
in future.
Satisfactory level of
detail containing
missing mandatory
data correct to
BS8888. Majority of
title block
construction from
stock Catia
templates. Frame
border and title block
poorly positioned on
page with little
consideration for
binding.
Discrepancies in
selection of font size
and type. Poor use
of discretionary data
to with some data
fields empty.
Satisfactory
construction of 3rd
angle projection
symbol.

Good knowledge of
Sketcher workbench
with majority of
sketches isoconstrained. Some
erroneous sketches
in Part-Tree and
some items requiring
update. Little or no
use of
Knowledgeware
items to allow for
quick updating and
editing of the product
in future.
Good level of detail
containing all
mandatory data
correct to BS8888.
Majority of title block
construction from
stock Catia
templates. Frame
border and title block
poorly positioned on
page with little
consideration for
binding. Good
selection of font size
and type. Poor use
of discretionary data
to with some data
fields empty. Good
construction of 3rd
angle projection
symbol.

Very good knowledge

of Sketcher
workbench with most
sketches fully isoconstrained. No
erroneous sketches in
Part-Tree and all
items fully updated.
Good use of
Knowledgeware items
to allow for quick
updating and editing
of the product in
future.

Excellent knowledge
of Sketcher
workbench with all
sketches fully isoconstrained. No
erroneous sketches in
Part-Tree and all
items fully updated.
Excellent use of
Knowledgeware items
to allow for quick
updating and editing
of the product in
future.

M3__Intelligence

All sketches fully isoconstrained, if you dont

know what this means
Id suggest checking
the very first tutorial you
did.

Very good level of

detail containing all
mandatory data and
some optional data
correct to BS8888.
Very good detail of
original construction
with some element
borrowed from stock
Catia templates.
Frame border and
title block correctly
positioned on page
with appropriate
borders to allow for
binding. Very good
selection of font size
and type correct to
BS8888. Evidence
of understanding
BS8888:2011/BS EN
ISO 7200/BS EN ISO
5457/BS EN ISO
3098/BS ISO
128:1982/BS 4500.
Appropriate use of
discretionary data to
complete data fields
in title block and good
construction of the
3rd angle projection
symbol at the correct
sizing detail.

An outstanding level
of detail containing all
mandatory data and a
selection of optional
data correct to
BS8888. Excellent
detail of original
construction not
template with frame
border and title block
correctly positioned
on page with
appropriate borders
to allow for binding.
Excellent selection of
font size and type.
Excellent adherence
to BS8888:2011/BS
EN ISO 7200/BS EN
ISO 5457/BS EN ISO
3098/BS ISO
128:1982/BS 4500.
Appropriate use of
discretionary data to
complete data fields
in title block and
excellent construction
of the 3rd angle
projection symbol at
the correct sizing
detail.

M4__Border

Please see appendix 1

for a list of mandatory
fields taken from BS EN
ISO 7200. It says here
clearly you should
construct your own title
block, therefore if you
used a stock template
you did not get over
40%.

General
Presentation
and positioning
of drawings on
page.

10

Poor use of space on

page with incorrect
scales used. Little or
no use of auxiliary
drawing to help
present the item.
Problems with
understanding of 3rd
angle orthographic.

Satisfactory use of
space on page with
incorrect scales used.
Little or no use of
extra sheets to
present extra detail.
Little or no use of
auxiliary drawing to
help present the item.
Problems with
understanding of 3rd
angle orthographic.
Little or no use of
lines such as
phantom lines,
breaks, centres of
hidden line detail and
appropriate to the
presentation of the
part.

Good use of space

on page with correct
scales and presented
neatly. Some use of
extra sheets to
present extra detail if
necessary. Some
use of auxiliary
drawing to help
present the item.
Problems with
understanding of 3rd
angle orthographic.
Some or
inappropriate use of
line such as phantom
lines, breaks, centres
of hidden line detail
and appropriate to
the presentation of
the part.

Very good use of

space on page with
correct scales and
presented neatly and
concisely. Very good
use of extra sheets to
present extra detail
where necessary.
Very good use of
auxiliary drawing to
help present the item.
All items drawn in 3rd
angle orthographic
with some use of
isometric detail for
better presentation.
Some use of line
such as phantom
lines, breaks, centres
of hidden line detail
and appropriate to the
presentation of the
part.

Excellent use of
space on page with
correct scales and
presented neatly and
concisely. Intelligent
use of extra sheets to
present extra detail
where necessary.
Outstanding attention
to use of auxiliary
drawing to help
present the item more
completely. All items
drawn in 3rd angle
orthographic with
excellent use of
isometric detail for
better presentation.
All linetypes such as
phantom lines,
breaks, centres of
hidden line detail
appropriate to the
presentation of the
part.

M5__General_Present

All items should have

been in PDF not in the
native CATDrawing file,
this was defined
specifically in the
handout. One page =
one component, I said
this in the BS8888
lecture, if you had
multiple components on
the same page you lost
marks. You should
have used scales set
out in BS8888,
alarmingly though some
of you had a
discrepancy between
the scale stated in the
title block and the actual
views on the drawing.
Consistency please.

Dimensions.

15

Poor positioning of
dimensions with
unnecessary
obstruction or
crossing of lines.
Illegible from two
directions. Unclear
as to what is a
dimension line and
what is the image
being dimensioned.
Poor level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
manufacture and
finish of the
component. A lot
data missing from
that required for
construction. Missing
dimensions leading to
manufacture of part.

Satisfactory
positioning of
dimensions located
away from image with
unnecessary
obstruction or
crossing of lines.
Illegible from two
directions. Unclear
as to what is a
dimension line and
what is the image
being dimensioned.
Satisfactory level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
manufacture and
finish of the
component. A lot
data missing from
that required for
construction. Missing
dimensions leading to
manufacture of part.

Good positioning of
dimensions located
away from image with
unnecessary
obstruction or
crossing of lines.
Illegible from two
directions. Unclear
as to what is a
dimension line and
what is the image
being dimensioned.
Good level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
manufacture and
finish of the
component. Majority
of data presented
required for
construction. Missing
dimensions leading to
manufacture of part.

Very good positioning

of dimensions located
away from image with
little obstruction or
crossing of line
unless absolutely
necessary offering.
Legible from two
directions. Very clear
what is a dimension
line and what is the
image being
dimensioned. Very
good level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
manufacture and
finish of the
component. Very
good use of
dimensioning to
represent all data
required for
construction
including, radii,
chamfers and other
surface finish data.
All dimensions should
lead to manufacture
of part and are very
easily understood on
the shopfloor
operators and other
parties.

Excellent positioning
of dimensions located
away from image with
no obstruction or
crossing of line
unless absolutely
necessary offering
clarity and compete
understanding of the
drawing. Legible
from two directions.
Very clear what is a
dimension line and
what is the image
being dimensioned.
Excellent level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
manufacture and
finish of the
component.
Excellent use of
dimensioning to
represent all data
required for
construction
including, radii,
chamfers and other
surface finish data.
All dimensions should
lead to manufacture
of part and are very
easily understood on
the shopfloor
operators and other
parties.

M6__Dimensions

Please re-read the

advice in the 70% box,
Id just be repeating
myself. What I found
most interesting is
where some people had
2-3 font types and
varying sizes, find some
examples of drawings to
try and learn from.
Dimensions falling over
drawings unnecessarily
was also something a lot
of people were guilty of,
confusing the drawing
completely. The biggest
problem I saw though
was line thicknesses
whereby all but about
five people had used the
same line thickness for
the dimensions as they
did for the profile of the
part. I know the most
common response
would be but Catia did
it automatically that
way, you should have
changed it so there was
a clear difference.
Knurling is presented in
a specific way if you
check BS8888, a lot of
you did a very good job
of modelling it, but when
it comes to presenting it
on a drawing you do not
need the detail of the
grooving.

Tolerances and
surface
textures and
material.

10

Little or no use of
tolerance data and
surface texture detail
correct to BS8888.
Little or no use of
simplified
representation of
GD&T to better
represent the
component.

Little or no use of
tolerance data and
surface texture detail
correct to BS8888.
Satisfactory detail of
machined faces and
edges. Little or no
use of simplified
representation of
GD&T to better
represent the
component.

Some use of
tolerance data and
surface texture detail
correct to BS8888.
Good attention to
detail of machined
faces and edges.
Some use of
simplified
representation of
GD&T to better
represent the
component.

Very good use of

tolerance data and
surface texture detail
correct to BS8888, to
fully describe the
construction of the
part. Very good
attention to detail of
machined faces and
edges required postmanufacture. Some
use of simplified
representation of
GD&T to better
represent the
component.

Appropriate
auxiliary views
to explain
features
further.

10

No use of auxiliary
views to offer further
understanding,
positioned poorly.
Poor understanding
the use of aux. views
in contribution to
presentation of part.
No detail of threads
and screws and use
of cut-aways, where
appropriate, to better
present the item.

Little or no use of
auxiliary views to
offer further
understanding,
positioned poorly.
Poor understanding
the use of aux. views
in contribution to
presentation of part.
Little or no detail of
threads and screws
and use of cutaways, where
appropriate, to better
present the item.

Good use of auxiliary

views to offer further
understanding,
positioned
satisfactorily with
good use of lines and
dimensioning. Good
understanding the
use of aux. views in
contribution to
presentation of part.
Good detail of
threads and screws
and use of cutaways, where
appropriate, to better
present the item.

Very good use of

auxiliary views to offer
further understanding,
positioned correctly
with very good use of
lines and
dimensioning detail to
qualify their use.
Very good
understanding the
use of aux. views in
contribution to
presentation of part.
Very good detail of
threads and screws
and use of cut-aways,
where appropriate, to
better present the
item.

Excellent use of
tolerance data and
surface texture detail
correct to BS8888, to
fully describe the
construction of the
part. Outstanding
attention to detail of
machined faces and
edges that are
required postmanufacture to allow
for easy interaction
with other moving
parts. Excellent use
of simplified
representation of
GD&T to better
represent the
component.
Excellent use of
appropriate auxiliary
views to offer further
understanding,
positioned correctly
with excellent use of
lines and
dimensioning detail to
qualify their use.
Outstanding evidence
of understanding the
use of aux. views in
contribution to
presentation of part.
Excellent attention to
detail of threads and
screws and use of
cut-aways, where
appropriate, to better
present the item.

M7__Tolerances

About three people

actually had any
appreciation of
tolerances, therefore
most of you got 0. See
comments on Task
compliance below.

M8__Aux_views

Again very few of you

added more than the
aux. views that were
present in the handout
and in many instances
there were more
required than just this
one.

Assembly Drawings

Exploded and
Assembly
clarity of
presentation.

10

One of the two

required views
missing. Of the one
presented; poor
presentation of data.
Little or no use of
labelling. Problems
with use of correct
views and alignment
of model in either
isometric or
orthographic as per
general
recommendations of
assembly drawings.
No BOM presented.

One of the two

required views
missing. Of the one
presented;
satisfactory
presentation of
exploded and
assembly data with
limited evidence of
use of guidelines set
out in recommended
literature. Little or no
use of labelling.
Problems with use of
correct views and
alignment of model in
either isometric or
orthographic as per
general
recommendations of
assembly drawings.
No BOM presented.

Good presentation of
exploded and
assembly data with
evidence of use of
understanding
guidelines set out in
recommended
literature. Good use
of labelling.
Problems with use of
correct views and
alignment of model in
either isometric or
orthographic as per
general
recommendations of
assembly drawings.
Inclusion of BOM
featuring but
problems with data
presented.

Very good
presentation of
exploded and
assembly data in
accordance with
guidelines set out in
recommended
literature. Very good
use of labelling
manufacturing data to
correctly understand
the data being
presented. Problems
with use of correct
views and alignment
of model in either
isometric or
orthographic as per
general
recommendations of
assembly drawings.
Inclusion of BOM
featuring appropriate
data suggested by
recommended
literature.

Appropriate
number of
dimensions to
aid in assembly
of the item.

Poor use of
dimensions located
inappropriately with
some unnecessary
obstruction or
crossing of lines
obscuring clarity.
Confusion as to what
is the image being
dimensioned.

Poor use of
dimensions located
inappropriately with
some unnecessary
obstruction or
crossing of lines
obscuring clarity.
Confusion as to what
is the image being
dimensioned.
Satisfactory level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
assembly and finish
of the component.

Suitable positioning
of dimensions located
appropriately with
some unnecessary
obstruction or
crossing of lines
obscuring clarity.
Clear what is a
dimension line and
what is the image
being dimensioned.
Good level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
assembly and finish
of the component.

Very good positioning

of dimensions located
away from image with
some obstruction or
crossing of lines
offering clarity and
compete
understanding of the
drawing. Very clear
what is a dimension
line and what is the
image being
dimensioned. Very
good level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
assembly and finish
of the component.

Outstanding
presentation of
exploded and
assembly data in
accordance with
guidelines set out in
recommended
literature. Excellent
use of labelling
manufacturing data to
correctly understand
the data being
presented. Use of
correct views and
alignment of model in
either isometric or
orthographic to most
appropriately
represent the data as
per general
recommendations of
assembly drawings.
Inclusion of BOM
featuring appropriate
data suggested by
recommended
literature.
Excellent positioning
of dimensions located
away from image with
no obstruction or
crossing of line
unless absolutely
necessary offering
clarity and compete
understanding of the
drawing. Very clear
what is a dimension
line and what is the
image being
dimensioned.
Excellent level of
understanding of
construction
requirements by use
of dimensions
appropriate to the
assembly and finish
of the component.

M9_Expl

Exploded drawings
should be isometric. A
lot of you still did not
click the isometric button
in the Part Design
workbench BEFORE
you imported it into the
Drawing bench,
therefore it was not
isometric, even if it said
it was. All other
requirements are stated
here.

M10__Dims

None of you did this,

maybe one.

Details
showing
movements
and assembly
requirements.

Little or no use of
auxiliary views to
present information
with. Poor
understanding the
use of aux. views in
contribution to
presentation of part.

Little or no use of
auxiliary views to
present information
with. Little or no use
of appropriate lines
such as phantom
lines or break lines to
represent movement
of necessary parts.
Poor understanding
the use of aux. views
in contribution to
presentation of part.

Use of auxiliary views

to present information
with. Little use of
appropriate lines
such as phantom
lines or break lines to
represent movement
of necessary parts.
Good evidence of
understanding the
use of aux. views in
contribution to
presentation of part.

Very good use of

auxiliary views to
present information
with no fear of
confusion or
misrepresentation.
Use of appropriate
lines such as
phantom lines or
break lines to
represent movement
of necessary parts.
Very good evidence
of understanding the
use of aux. views in
contribution to
presentation of part.

Excellent use of
auxiliary views to fully
present information
with no fear of
confusion or
misrepresentation.
Use of appropriate
lines such as
phantom lines or
break lines to
represent movement
of necessary parts.
Outstanding evidence
of understanding the
use of aux. views in
contribution to
presentation of part.

M11__Move

About two of you did

this.

Your final mark; FM2 %

100

General Note
The biggest problem with everyones handin last year was something called Task Compliance. Put simply, many people did not read the marking criteria, and simply lost
marks as a result of not handing in the basic requirements.. The mark scheme above was handed out with the original document and has been on moodle throughout, it also
highlights which areas to target your research as they are generally weighted much higher. As a result you will see that the grading for each area does not strictly tally with
your overall grade as Ive had to moderate the marks up by adding a multiplier, just because otherwise most of you would have failed.
Overall though I was impressed with the general ability to operate CATIA. The aim of this coursework (as highlighted above) was for you to present your parts correctly in
accordance with industry standards (BS8888 and related documents), which required as much research on them as it did to draw the parts.