Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Course Description:
• This course will focus on the causes and consequences of criminal victimization.
We will begin with a discussion of the major theories of criminal victimization
and look at the relationship between victimization and offending and between
criminal victimization and other types of victimizaton. We will also consider how
victims cope with victimization -- attitudinally, cognitively, and behaviorally.
We will also examine the role of victims in the criminal justice system, including
reporting to the police, testifying in court, seeking compensation, and giving
victim impact statements at sentencing and parole hearings. Finally, we will be
discussing the policy implications of research findings on several different topics.
Course Objectives:
• To provide students with a basic knowledge of criminal victimization
• To improve critical thinking skills of students as they are used in the classroom
and in everyday life
• To strengthen skills essential to communication: reading, writing, and oral
presentation
• To better understand the scientific process as it is reflected in Victimology.
• Due to the difficult nature of the material addressed in class, students may
experience a need or desire to process some of their own personal experiences
with victimization. Students should know ahead of time that this is a completely
normal and reasonable response given the subject matter. While the classroom is
not the appropriate venue for this processing to take place, there are several
resources that are available to you on UTD’s Campus:
• The Galerstein Women’s Center
http://www.utdallas.edu/student/womensctr/
• The Student Counseling Center
http://www.utdallas.edu/counseling/index.html
• The Student Health Center http://www.utdallas.edu/healthcenter/
Requirements:
• Texts: There will be 2 texts used in this class. In addition, you will be required to
read news articles that are posted to the class WebCT site.
• Victims of Crime by Davis, Lurigio, and Skogan (Eds.)
• Violent Victimization by Ruback and Thompson
• News Articles and Links Posted on WebCT
• Examinations: There will be four midterm exams in this course, and one
cumulative make-up final.
• The exams for this course will comprise of some combination of multiple
choice, short answer, and short essay. NO make-up exams will be given.
Failure to take an exam will result in a zero grade (unless you have been
granted permission from the instructor PRIOR to the exam OR HAVE
DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF ILLNESS, etc.).
• Once you sit for any exam, you will receive a grade for that exam. There
are no exceptions.
• Once the first person taking the test leaves the room, students that come
late are no longer eligible to sit for that exam.
• Exam questions will be taken from lecture and the text. You will find
daily attendance and note-taking to be helpful in exam preparation.
• The fourth mid-term Exam will include an essay that can potentially
reflect material that is presented throughout this course (i.e., one
cumulative question asking you to tie together what you have learned in
the course). Keeping track of your notes and outlining the readings is
helpful for students when they prepare for an exam.
• Evaluation:
Exam 1: 100 points
Exam 2: 100 points
Exam 3: 100 points
Exam 4: 100 points
Paper or Presentation 100 points
• In-class writing assignments, WebCT assignments, reading summaries, etc. (as
assigned)
• For example – If I give an in-class assignment worth 10 points, then that 10 points
counts toward the final number of points available in that class (i.e., it figures into
the denominator). So, if I earn 8/10 points, I add the 8 points to the number of
points that I have earned in the class (the numerator), and I add the 10 points to
the number of points possible in the class (the denominator).
• GRADES WILL BE POSTED ON WebCT. I do keep permanent records, but
YOU are responsible for keeping track of how you do in this class. Please write
down your scores on all assignments, as well as the total number of points that are
available for that assignment. Remember -- a review of grades can go both ways.
• Now, there are multiple ways to steal someone else’s ideas. Stephen Wilhoit in
his article entitled, “Helping Students Avoid Plagiarism,” lists several forms of
plagiarism (College Teaching, v 42 (Fall 1994): 161-164):
• Buying or lifting a paper, or any portion of a paper, off the internet.
• Turning in a paper written by a fellow student, with or without her
knowledge.
• Copying information directly from a source without providing
documentation (i.e., without a citation explaining where you got the
information). Keep in mind that changing the order of the sentence or
replacing a few words does not make the sentence yours!
• Copying information directly from a source and providing a citation, but
not putting the copied material in quotations, even if you cited the author.
• Putting the source’s information in your own words, but without providing
a citation. Even if they are your words, the ideas were the author’s. As a
general rule, any information that you gathered by reading a source (i.e.,
information you did not know previously) must be cited!
Disability Services:
• We have an excellent Disability Services office on campus. If you require special
accommodations, please make sure you go and see them immediately if you have
not already done so.
• The University of Texas at Dallas is committed to providing educational
opportunities for all persons. If you anticipate needing accommodations for
learning differences, please let me know. If you require accommodations, please
make sure that you are properly registered with the Disabilities Services Office
(972) 883-2070.
• If you have a condition that requires accommodation in this course, please speak
with me after class or in office hours during the first week of class. I will be
happy to make appropriate accommodations provided timely notice is received
and the arrangement is consistent with any recommendations from Disability
Services, when applicable.
Tentative Schedule of Readings:
Changes may be made to this schedule. I will announce changes in class and/or will post
information on WebCT. YOU are responsible for all changes (e.g., reading assignments,
assignment deadlines, etc.).
ORIENTATION – Aug 22
The due dates for readings, articles, and assignments will be announced in class.
Remember, you are required to come prepared for class.
INTRODUCTION
Ruback, R. B. & Thompson, M. P. (2001). Introduction and Overview. Social and
Psychological Consequences of Violent Victimization. (pp. 1-29).
MEASURING VICTIMIZATION
Ruback, R. B. & Thompson, M. P. (2001). Studying the Effects of Victimization. Social and
Psychological Consequences of Violent Victimization. (pp. 29-49).
IMPACT OF VICTIMIZATION
(Topics: Fear, PTSD, Anxiety, Depression; Preventing Future Victimization)
Norris, F. H., Kaniasty, K., & Thompson, M. P. (1997). The psychological consequences of
crime: Findings from a longitudinal population-based study. In R. C. Davis, A. J.
Lurigio, & W. G. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of Crime (2nd ed., pp. 146-166). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Friedman, L. N., & Tucker, S. B. (1997). Violence prevention through victim assistance:
Helping people escape the web of violence. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, & W. G.
Skogan (Eds.), Victims of Crime (2nd ed., pp. 183-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Garner, J. & Fagan, J. (1997). Victims of Domestic Violence. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, &
W. G. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of Crime (2nd ed., pp. 53-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CHILD VICTIMS
Finkelhor, D. (1997). The victimization of children and youth. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, &
W. G. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of Crime (2nd ed., pp. 86-107). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
HATE CRIMES
Garofalo, J. (1997). Hate crime victimization in the United States. In R. C. Davis, A. J.
Lurigio, & W. G. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of Crime (2nd ed., pp. 134-145). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
INTERVENTIONS
Topics: Individuals; Communities; the Criminal Justice System
Ruback, R. B. & Thompson, M. P. (2001). Summary and Implications. Social and
Psychological Consequences of Violent Victimization. (pp. 181-203).
Kelly, D. P., & Erez, E. (1997). Victim participation in the criminal justice system. In R. C.
Davis, A. J. Lurigio, & W. G. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of Crime (2nd ed., pp. 231-244).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Smith, B. E., & Hillenbrand, S. W. (1997). Making victims whole again: Restitution, victim-
offender reconciliation programs, and compensation. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, & W.
G. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of Crime (2nd ed., pp. 245-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Young, M. A. (1997). Victim rights and services: A modern saga. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio,
& W. G. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of Crime (2nd ed., pp. 194-210). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.