Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Although upsetting to hear that she had to go through what I had, too, I was happy
that I had successfully produced something so real.
My first draft was very rough, as the author of Shitty First Drafts suggested
it should be. I still got pretty good feedback on it at the peer-edit, but I knew I had a
lot of work to do. Revising is probably my least favorite part of any writing process,
as I typically just want to finish the paper as fast as I can. However, the readings
assigned to us throughout the week offered some great tips about writing audio
narratives that really helped my editing and revising process.
The Improving Audio Essays piece emphasized clearly that because this
piece was in audio format, and not in writing, that it had to have an organized
structure. My draft was very out of order and scattered, so my first step was to make
the structure cleaner. I worked very hard to make my piece more focused, but also
more captivating so that the audience would want to keep listening. Second, I
worked on inputting details that appealed to the senses. I tried to make the
emotions I felt emotions that the reader could feel with me. I incorporated more
setting and more character, through the use of description. I was also excited to
incorporate devices such as exemplum and epistrophe into my piece which I
discovered and learned about on the American Rhetoric website. Finally, I worked
on leaving the listeners with a take home message. This part of my essay, which
comes towards the end, is where I really tried to develop my purpose. I tried to
express how this narrative relates to not only me, but to many other people out
there. This was hard to do without rambling, but I did my best in sharing a story and
message that is very powerful to me, and I am very happy with my final product.