Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM)

e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN: 2319-765X. Volume 10, Issue 6 Ver. IV (Nov - Dec. 2014), PP 63-70
www.iosrjournals.org

On RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms


R.A.Muneshwar1, K.L.Bondar2, V.S.Thosare3
1

Department of Mathematics, NES Science College, SRTMU Nanded, India 431602


Department of Mathematics, NES Science College, SRTMU Nanded, India 431602
3
Department of Mathematics, NES Science College, SRTMU Nanded, India 431602
2

Abstract: In this paper we have introduced the new concept of RAM finite hyperbolic transforms. Transform of some
standard functions are obtained and some properties are proved.
Keywords: Generalized Transform, Finite transform, RAM Finite hyperbolic transform, Transform of some
standard functions.

I.

Introduction:

The Laplace transform method is normally used to find the response of a linear system at any time t to
at 2

the initial data at t = 0 and disturbance f(t) acting for t > 0. If the disturbance is f(t) = e , for a > 0, the usual
Laplace transform cannot be used to find the solution of an initial value problem because Laplace transform of
f(t) does not exist. It is often true that the solution at times later than t would not affect the state at time t. This
leads to define Finite Laplace transform.
The finite Laplace transform of a continuous or an almost piecewise continuous function f(t) in (0,T) is denoted
by LT (f(t)) = F(p,T), and is defined by
LT (f(t)) = F(p,T) =

f(t)e-ptdt

(1.1)

Where p is a real or complex number and T be a finite number which may be positive or negative.
Note : Above definition is defined for any bounded interval (-T1, T2).
Finite Laplace transform motivate us to define RAM Finite Sine Hyperbolic transform and RAM Finite Cosine
Hyperbolic transform in 0 < t < T in order to extend the power and usefulness of usual Laplace transform in 0 <
t < . In section 2, the concept of RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms is introduced. Section 3 is devoted to
explain existence conditions for these transforms. Sections 4 and 5 are devoted to obtain these transforms of
some standard functions. Some properties like Linearity, Scalar Multiplication, and Scaling are proved in
sections 6 and 7. Section 8 is devoted to Discussion and Conclusion.

II.

RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms:

Definition 2.1: Let p C and T be a finite number which may be positive or negative and f(t) is a continuous
or an almost piecewise continuous function defined over the interval (0,T). Then RAM Finite Sine Hyperbolic
transform of f(t) is denoted by Rsh (f(t)) = FS(p,T), and defined by
Rsh(f(t)) = FS(p,T)=

sinh(pt)f(t)dt,

where sinh(pt) is a Kernel of Rsh.


Here Rsh is called RAM Finite Sine Hyperbolic transformation operator.
Definition 2.2: Let p C and T be a finite number which may be positive or negative and f(t) is a continuous
or an almost piecewise continuous function defined over the interval (0,T). Then RAM Finite Cosine Hyperbolic
transform of f(t) is denoted by Rch(f(t))= FC(p,T), and defined by
Rch (f(t)) = FC(p,T)=

cosh(pt ) f(t)dt,

where cosh(pt) is a Kernel of Rch.


Here Rch is called RAM Finite Cosine Hyperbolic transformation operator.
Note : sinht, cosht are bounded for any bounded interval (-T1,T2).

III.

Existence of Rsh and Rch.

Theorem 3.1 If f(t) is a piecewise continuous and absolutely integrable function on (0,T), then Rsh(f(t)) exists.
Proof: As sinht is bounded on (0,T), there exist K [0, ) such that | sinh(pt)| < K on (0,T). Since f(t) is
absolutely integrable, there exist M [0,

) such that

| f ( t ) | d t < M.

www.iosrjournals.org

63 | Page

On RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms


Consider
T

|Rsh (f (t))|

<

sinh(pt) f (t)dt|

0
T

|sinh(pt)| | f (t)||dt|

0
T

<

K | f (t) dt|

<

| f (t) dt |

K.M.
|Rsh (f(t)| <
Thus Rsh (f(t)) exists. Hence proved.
Theorem 3.2 If f(t) is a piecewise continuous and absolutely integrable function on (0, T), then Rch (f(t)) exists.
Proof: Consider
T

|Rch (f(t))|

<

|cosh(pt)| |f(t)||dt |

0
T

<

K| f (t)dt |

<

| Rch (f (t))| < M.K. (since

cosh(pt) f(t)dt |

0
T

( since |cosh(pt)| < K on (0, T), 0 < K <

| f (t)dt |

| f (t)| dt < M, 0 < M <

Thus Rch (f (t)) exists. Hence proved.


Theorem 3.3: If f (t) is a piecewise continuous and bounded function on (0, T), then
Rsh (f (t)) exists.
Proof: Consider
|Rsh (f(t)) |

<
<

0
T

sinh(pt) f (t) dt |
|sinh(pt)| | f (t)| | dt |

M.K. |dt | (since |f (t)| < M on (0, T), 0 < K, M <

|Rsh (f (t))|
<M.K.T.

Thus Rsh exists. Hence proved.


Theorem 3.4: If f(t) is a piecewise continuous and bounded function on (0, T), then Rch(f (t)) exists.
Proof : consider
|Rsh (f(t))|

<
< MK

cosh(pt) f(t) dt|

0
T

|cosh(pt)| | f(t) dt|

|dt| (since |cosh (pt)| < K, | f (t)| < M on (0,T), 0 < K,M <

<
M.K.T.
|Rch (f(t))|
Thus Rch (f(t)) exists. Hence Proved.

IV.

RAM Finite Sine Hyperbolic transform of some standard functions:


www.iosrjournals.org

64 | Page

On RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms


1.

Rsh(1) =

cosh( pT ) 1
p

Proof:
Rsh(1)

=
2.

Rsh(t)

sinh(pt)dt

cosh( pT ) 1
p
T cosh( pT) sinh( pT)
=
p
p2

Proof:
Rsh (t)

3.

T cosh( pT) sinh( pT)


p
p2

t sinh(pt)dt

T 2 cosh( pT) 2T sinh( pT) (2cosh( pT ) 2)


Rsh (t ) =
+
.
p
p3
p2
2

Proof:
2

Rsh (t )

4.

T 2 cosh( pT) 2T sinh( pT) (2cosh( pT ) 2)


+
.
p
p3
p2

t2 sinh (pt)dt

T k cosh( pT ) kT k 1 sinh( pT )
k !(1) k [cosh( pT ) 1]

....
, if k is even

p
P2
pk

k
Rsh (t ) =
k
k 1
k
T cosh( pT ) kT sinh( pT ) .... k !(1) sinh( pT ) , if k is odd

p
P2
pk

Proof:
Rsh (tk) =

tk sinh(pt)dt

T
t k cosh( pt ) T kt k 1 sinh( pt ) T
k !( 1)k cosh( pt )


.......
,if k is even,
p
p2
pk

0
0

0
=
T
T
T
k !( 1)k sinh( pt )
t k cosh( pt ) kt k 1 sinh( pt )

.......
,if k is odd.

2
k
p
p
p

0
0
0

T k cosh( pT ) kT k 1 sinh( pT )
k !( 1)k [cosh( pT ) 1]

....

, if k is even

p
P2
pk

=
k
k 1
k
T cosh( pT ) kT sinh( pT ) .... k !( 1) sinh(pT ) , if k is odd

p
P2
pk
5.

Rsh (sin(at))

p
a
sinh(pT) cos(aT) + 2
cosh(pT) sin(aT).
2
2
p a
p a

Proof:
www.iosrjournals.org

65 | Page

On RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms

Rsh (sin(at))

sin(at) sinh (pt) dt

sinh( pT )cos(aT ) p cos( pT )sin( aT ) p 2 Rsh (sin(at )


=
+
.
a2
a
a2

p2
sinh( pT ).cos(aT ) p.cos( pT ).sin(aT )
=
+
.
1 2 Rsh (sin(at))
a
a2
a
a
p
i.e. Rsh (sin(at)) = 2
sinh(pT). cos(aT) + 2
cosh(pT) sin(aT).
2
2
p a
p a

p
a
sinh (pT). sin (aT) + 2
[cosh(pT). cos(aT) 1].
2
2
p a
p a

6. Rsh (cos(at)) =

Proof:
Rsh (cos(at))

cos(at) sinh (pt) dt

sinh( pT ).sin(aT ) [ p.cosh( pT ).cos(aT ) p] p 2 .Rsh (cos(at ))


=
+
a2
a
a2

p2
sinh( pT )sin(aT ) [ p.cosh( pT ).cos( aT) p]
+
1 2 Rsh (cos(at)) =
a
a2
a

p
a
sinh(pT). sin (aT) + 2
[cosh (pT). cos (aT) 1].
2
2
p a
p a
a
p
7. Rsh(eat) = 2
sinh(pT). eaT + 2
[cosh (pT). eaT 1], provided p2 a2.
2
2
p a
p a
i.e. Rsh (cos(at)) =

Proof:
at

Rsh (e ) =

eat sinh (pt) dt

sinh( pT ).eaT [ p.cos( pT ) eaT p] p 2 .Rsh (eat )


+
a
a2
a2
a
p
-sinh(pT). eaT + 2
[cosh(pT). eaT 1], provided p2 a2.
Rsh (eat) = 2
2
2
p a
p a
a
p
8. Rsh (e-at) = 2
sinh(pT). e-aT + 2
[1-cosh (pT). e-aT], Provided P2 a2.
2
2
p a
p a
=

Proof:
Rsh (e-at) =

e-at sinh (pt) dt

sinh( pT ).e aT [ p.cosh( pT ).e aT p] p 2 Rsh (e at )


=
+
a2
a2
a
sinh( pT ).e aT [ p.cosh( pT ).e aT p]
=
a2
a

p2
1 2 Rsh (e-at)
a
a
p
i.e. Rsh (e-at) = 2
sinh(pT).e-aT + 2
[1-cosh(pT). e-aT], provided p2 a2.
2
2
p a
p a
www.iosrjournals.org

66 | Page

On RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms


V.

1.

RAM Finite Cosine Hyperbolic Transform of some standard functions:

Rch (1) =

sinh( pT )
.
p

Proof:
Rch(t)

2.

Rch (t) =

sinh( pT )
p

cosh (pt) dt

Tsinh(pT) cosh( pT ) 1

p
p2

Proof:
Rch(t)

3.

Rch(t2) =

Tsinh(pT) cosh( pT ) 1

p
p2

t cosh (pt) dt

T 2 .sinh( pT ) 2.T .cosh( pT ) 2.sinh( pT )

.
p
P2
p3

Proof:
Rch(t)

t2 . cosh (pt) dt

T 2 .sinh( pT ) 2.T .cosh( pT ) 2.sinh( pT )

.
p
P2
p3

4.

T k sinh( pT ) kT k 1 cosh( pT )
k !(1) k sinh( pT )

.......

,if k is even,

2
k
p
p
p

Rch(tk) =
.
k
k 1
k
T sinh( pT ) kT cosh( pT ) ....... k !(1) [cosh( pT ) 1] ,if k is odd.

p
p2
pk

Proof:
Rch(tk)

tk cosh (pt) dt

T
t k sinh( pt ) T kt k 1 cosh( pT ) T
k !(1) k sinh( pt )


....
, if k is even
p
P2
pk

0
0

0
=
T
T
T
k !(1) k cosh( pt )
t k .sinh( pt ) kt k 1 cosh( pt )

....
, if k is odd

p
P2
pk
0
0

T k sinh( pT ) kT k 1 cosh( pT )
k !(1) k sinh( pT )

.......

,if k is even,

p
p2
pk

=
.
k
k 1
k
T
sinh(
pT
)
kT
cosh(
pT
)
k
!(

1)
[cosh(
pT
)

1]

.......
,if k is odd.

p
p2
pk
a
p
5.
Rch (Sin(at))
= 2
[1 cosh(pT) cos(aT)] + 2
sinh(pT) sin(aT).
2
2
p a
p a
www.iosrjournals.org

67 | Page

On RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms


Proof:
Rch (sin(at))

sin(at) cosh(pt) dt

[cos( pT )cos(aT ) 1] p sinh( pT )sin(aT ) p 2 Rch (sin(at ))


=
+

a2
a2
a

p2
[cos( pT )cos(aT ) 1] p sinh( pT )sin(aT )
=

1 2 Rch (sin(at))
a
a2
a
a
p
i.e. Rch (Sin(at))
= 2
[1 cosh(pT) cos(aT)] + 2
sinh(pT) sin(aT).
2
2
p a
p a
6.

p
a
cosh(pT) sin(aT) + 2
sinh(pT) cos(aT).
2
2
p a
p a

Rch (cos(at))

Proof:
Rch cos(at)

cos(at) cosh(pt) dt

cosh( pT )sin(aT ) p sinh( pT )cos(aT ) p 2 Rch (cos(at ))


+
.
a
a2
a2

p2
cosh( pT )sin(aT ) p sinh( pT )cos( aT )
R (cos(at))
=
+
1

2 ch
a
a2
a
a
p
i.e. Rch (cos(at)) = 2
cosh(pT) sin(aT) + 2
sinh(pT) cos(aT).
2
2
p a
p a
=

7.

p
a
[cosh(pT) eaT 1] + 2
sinh(pT) eaT, Provided p2 a2.
2
2
p a
p a

Rch(eat) =

Proof:

at

Rch (e ) =

eat cosh(pt) dt

[cosh( pT )eaT 1] p.sinh( pT )eaT


p 2 Rch (eat )
+
.
a
a2
a2

p2
[cosh( pT )eaT 1]
p.sinh( pT )eaT
at
=
1 2 Rch(e )
a
a2
a
a
p
i.e. Rch(eat) = 2
[cosh(pT) eaT 1] + 2
sinh(pT) eaT, Provided p2 a2.
2
2
p

a
p

p
a
cosh(pT) e-aT + 2
[1-sinh(pT) e-aT], provided p2 a2.
2
2
p

a
p

8. Rch (e-at)

Proof :
-at

Rch (e ) =

e-at cosh(pt) dt

[cosh( pT )e aT 1] p sinh( pT )e aT
p 2 Rch (e at )
+
a
a2
a2

p2
[cosh( pT )e aT 1] p sinh( pT )e aT
-at
=
1 2 Rch(e )
a
a2
a

www.iosrjournals.org

68 | Page

On RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms

p
a
(cosh(pT) e-aT 1) + 2
[sinh(pT) e-aT] ; provided p2 a2.
2
2
p a
p a

i.e. Rch (e-at)

VI.
1.
Proof:

Some Properties of RAM Finite Sine Hyperbolic transform:

Linearity:
Rsh (f1(t) + f2 (t)) = Rsh (f1 (t)) + Rsh (f2 (t)).
Let 0 < t < T, then by definition

Rsh (f1 (t) + f2 (t)) =

( f1(t) + f2 (t)) sinh(pt) dt

0
T

f1(t) sinh (pt)dt +

f2 (t) sinh(pt) dt

=
Rsh ( f1(t)) + Rsh ( f2 (t)).
2.
Scalar Multiplication: If c be any constant, then Rsh (cf (t)) = cRsh ( f (t)).
Proof: Let c be any constant, then by definition
T

Rsh (c f (t))

=
=

f (t) sinh (pt)dt

3.

c f (t) sinh (pt)dt

cRsh ( f (t)).

FS , aT
a

Scaling: If Rsh ( f(t)) = FS (p, T) then Rsh ( f (at)) =


a

Proof: Let Rsh ( f (t)) = FS (p, T), then by definition


Rsh ( f (at))

f (at) sinh (pt)dt

xp
f ( x)sinh
a dx
0
a
p

FS , aT
a

VII.

Some Properties of RAM Finite Cosine Hyperbolic transform:

1.
Linearity : Rch (f1 (t) + f2 (t)) = Rch (f1(t)) + Rch(f2 (t))
Proof: Let 0 < t < T, then by definition
Rch ( f1 (t) + f2 (t))

=
=

0
T
0

( f1 (t) + f2 (t)) cosh(pt)dt


f1 (t) cosh (pt) dt +

f2 (t) cosh(pt)dt

= Rch (f1 (t)) + Rch (f2 (t)).


2.
Scalar Multiplication: If c is any constant, then Rch (c. f (t)) = c. Rch (f(t))
Proof: Let c be any constant, then by definition
T

Rch (c f(t))

=c
=

(c f (t)) cosh (pt) dt

f (t) cosh (pt) dt

= c Rch ( f (t)).

www.iosrjournals.org

69 | Page

On RAM Finite Hyperbolic Transforms

3.

FC , aT
a

Scaling: If Rch (f(t)) = FC(p, T), then Rch (f (at)) =


a

Proof: Let Rch(f(t)) = FC (p, T), then


Rch (f(at))

f (at) cosh (pt) dt

xp
( f ( x))cosh
a dx
=
a
p

FC , aT
a

=
a

VIII.

Discussion and Conclusion:

Unlike the usual Laplace transform of a function f(t), there is no restriction needed on the transform
variable p for the existence of Rch(f(t)) and Rsh(f(t)). Further, the existence of Rch(f(t)) and Rsh(f(t))does not
require exponential order property of a function f(t) . If a function f(t) has the usual Laplace transform, then it
also has the RAM Finite Sine Hyperbolic transform and RAM Finite Cosine Hyperbolic transform. In other
words, if L(f(t)) exists, then Rch(f(t)) and Rsh(f(t))exists as shown below. We have

L(f (t)) =

0
T
0

f (t) e-pt dt
T

(f(t)) +

f(t) cosh (pt) dt -

= Rch (f (t)) Rsh

f(t) sin (pt) dt +

f (t) e-pt dt

f (t) e-pt dt .

Since L(f(t)) exists, all the three integrals on R.H.S. exist. Hence, if L(f(t)) exists then Rch (f(t)) and
Rsh(f(t))exists but converse is not necessarily true. This can be shown by an example. It is well known that the
usual Laplace transform of f(t) = eat , for a > 0, does not exist but Rch(eat ) and Rsh(eat ) both exists.

References:
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].

Chandrasenkharan K., Classical Fourier Transform, Springer-Verlag, New York (1989).


Debnath L.and Thomas J., On Finite Laplace Transformation with Application, Z.Angrew.Math.und meth.56(1976),559-593.
S.B.Chavan, V.C.Borkar., Canonical Sine transform and their Unitary Representation, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Science, Vol.7,
2012, No. 15,717-725.
S.B.Chavan, V.C.Borkar., Operation Calculus of Canonical Cosine transform, IAENG
International Journal of Applied
Mathematics, 2012.
S.B.Chavan, V.C.Borkar., Some aspect of Canonical Cosine transform of generalised function, Bulletin of Pure and Applied
Sciences.Vol.29E(No.1),2010.
S.B.Chavan, V.C.Borkar., Analyticity and Inversion for Generalised Canonical Sine transforms, Applied Science Periodical
Vol.XIV, (No 2), May 2012.
Lokenath debnath, Dombaru Bhatta, Integral Transfer and there application, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor and Francis group,
(2007).
Watson E.J., Laplace Transformation and Application, Van Nostrand, Reinhold, New York(1981).
S.B.Chavan, V.C.Borkar., Some properties and Applications of Generalised Canonical Transforms, Inter National Journal of
Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, No.7, 309-314, 2011.
Wyman M.,
The method of the Laplace Transformation, Roy.Soc.Canada,(2)(1964),227-256.
Zemanian A.H., Generalised Integral Transformation, John Wiley and Son, New York, (1969).
Zemanian A.H., Distribution Theory and Transform Analysis, John Wiley and Son, New York, (1969).

www.iosrjournals.org

70 | Page

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi