Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A few decades ago telecommunications had been revolutionized by fiber optic technology. This
revolution became a route as mass production techniques coupled with technical improvements
resulted in superior performance at lower costs than those of alternative approaches. Next to this
revolution emerged another one as a result of combination of the fiber optic telecommunication
product outgrowths with optoelectronic devices to create fiber optic sensors. These areas of
opportunities include the potential of replacing the majority of environmental sensors in existence
today as well as opening up entire markets where sensors with comparable capability do not exist.
The figures 1.1 and 1.2 provide a brief classification of the fiber optic sensors that can be
basically divided in two groups - extrinsic and intrinsic fiber optic sensors. Extrinsic fiber optic
sensors are distinguished by the characteristic that sensing takes place in a region outside the fiber.
There are also hybrid fiber optic sensors that are similar to extrinsic ones and can be thought of as
a "black box" sensors for which fiber are used to carry light to the box and back. Frequently the
two terms are applied interchangeably. A major distinction arises for the case of power by light
sensors when a light beam is used to power an electronic sensor and data are carried back via a
fiber optic data link. In this case the hybrid designation would appear to be more appropriate.
Figure 1.2 shows a diagram illustrating many of the intrinsic or all-fiber optic sensors. "Intrinsic"
and "all-fiber" indicate that the sensing takes place within the fiber itself. In this case the two
designations can be and commonly are used interchangeably. A large and important subclass of
intrinsic or all-fiber optic sensors are interferometric sensors. Many of the highest performance
sensors fall into this group. The fiber optic sensors of figures 1.1 and 1.2 have been grouped into
the categories that are representative of their most common current development and application.
It is apparent that virtually any environmental effect that can be conceived of can be converted
to an optical signal to be interpreted. The usual case that each environmental effect may be
measured by dozens of fiber optic sensors approaches. The key is often to design the sensor so that
only the desired environmental effect is sensed.
Initial penetration of fiber optic sensors into markets has been driven by performance
advantages. Fiber optic sensors offer an all-passive dielectric approach that is often crucial to
successful applications, inclusion the electrical isolation of patients in medicine, elimination of
conductive path in high voltage environments, and compatibility within materials. The lightweight
and small size of these devices are critical in such areas as aerospace and provide substantial
advantages to many products. Coupled to the issue of size and weight is immunity to the
electromagnetic interference. Conventional electrical sensors often require heavy shielding,
significantly increasing the cost, size, and weight. Environmental ruggedness provides key
opportunities for fiber optic sensors, including high-temperature operation and all solid state
configurations capable of withstanding extreme vibrations and shock levels. Completing these
attributes are high sensitivity and bandwidth of fiber optic sensors. When multiplexed into arrays
of sensors the large bandwidth of the optical fibers themselves offer distinct advantages in their
ability to transport resultant data.
Fig. 2.1. Simplified diagram of mechanisms that can be used in OTDR based sensor systems
The most basic form of intrinsic distributed sensor relies on the detection of regions of localized
excess loss, due to, for example, microbending. In the case of measurand-dependent loss, a
localized region of increased loss () due to perturbation of the fiber by the measurand field
(stress, temperature, external refractive index, etc.) causes a change in the slope of the detected
backscattered signal versus time-delay curve (OTDR curve) at a time delay corresponding to the
signal position of the perturbation.
Polarization optical time-domain reflectometry (PO-OTDR) is a variant of OTDR which was
the first to be proposed for use in sensing applications. Here the polarization of Rayleigh
backscattered light in a monomode fiber is detected as a function of time. The birefringence
parameters of monomode fiber are sensitive to a number of measurands, such as strain, pressure,
and electric and magnetic fields. Consequently, the state of polarization (SOP) of the
backscattered light varies with distance z along the fiber. This variant of the OTDR technique has
been proposed for the distributed monitoring of electric (via the electro-optic Kerr effect) and
magnetic fields (via the magneto-optic Faraday effect).
The backscatter intensity in an OTDR system is proportional to the backscattered reflection
coefficient r(z). This provides a means of distributed sensing via measurand dependencies in r(z).
In general, this parameter is homogeneous along the fiber length and has negligible dependence on
external perturbations, such as bends lateral pressure and the like. The backscatter coefficient is,
however, temperature dependent: in solid core fibers this effect is extremely weak, as the
microscopic variations in refractive index in the core that give rise to the effect are essentially
frozen in place. However, in liquids the Rayleigh scattering coefficient and refractive index are
generally much more strongly dependent on temperature. Temperature sensing using the thermal
dependence in liquid-core fibers was demonstrated at an early stage of research in this field.
A number of specialty rare-earth-doped fibers have been researched for applications in optical
fiber amplifiers and fiber lasers, and distributed temperature sensors based on temperaturedependent absorption in such fibers have been demonstrated. In particular, neodymium- and
holmium-doped fibers have been shown to be suitable for use in distributed temperature-sensing
applications. In these fibers the strong absorption bands associated with the dopants broaden and
shift to slightly longer wavelengths with increasing temperature. OTDR measurements of the
spatial variation of the fiber loss at a wavelength close to the absorption band can thus be used to
perform the distributed temperature sensing.
In practice, increased loss in doped fibers can occur due to effects other than temperature, such
as bends and kinks, giving rise to the possibility of erroneous outputs. This necessitates the need
for some means of referencing to provide correction or compensation of such effects. This can be
accomplished very easily in this type of sensors using a second OTDR interrogating source of
wavelength shifted sufficiently far enough from the absorption band to monitor non-temperaturedependent loss mechanisms in the fiber.
Various other loss mechanisms can be utilized in distributed sensing, such as the temperature
dependence of bending loss in plastic-clad silica fibers (PCS), evanescent field radiative loss due
to external refractive index changes (due to, for instance, temperature variations in a fixed external
medium or liquid leakage) or continuous microbending loss in fiber. For example, quasicontinuous microbending loss can be introduced in a fiber by stringing it along a zigzag path
attached to a structure, or using a fiber sheathed with a spiral jacket to produce localized
microbending when lateral pressure is applied.
The temperature dependence of fluorescence can also provide a means for distributed
temperature sensing. To accomplish this, fibers dopants with short fluorescence lifetimes are
required to provide a good degree of spatial resolution, normally attainable using OTDR based
systems. Organic laser day dopant materials in polymer fibers have been proposed for distributed
sensing by fluorescence.
Fig. 5.1.2.1. Simplified block diagram of the OFDR-FS based reflectometer, FC - fiber coupler,
FD - photodetector