Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Page|1
The temperature generally ranges between 13 to 50 C. The area is categorized as barani, in general,
because the western side of the city receives hill torrents of this area (Sulaiman Range).
On the western side of the city, the Dera Ghazi Khan Canal flows beyond the Lahore-Quetta Railway
lines and on the northern side, the Manka seepage drain defines the boundary of the city. On the
southern side the road to Kot Addu and in the southeast the road to Taunsa form the boundaries of the
city area.
D.G. Khan is the headquarters of the Tehsil of the same name. The Dera Ghazi Khan Tehsil has a
population of around 1.3 million. The Tehsil has 46 Unions. The urban areas encompass 7 unions, each
with a population of approximately 27,000 inhabitants (census data of 1998). Thus, the total urban
population of Dera Ghazi Khan City was around 190,000 (according to the census data of 1998). The
TMA estimates the present population of the city to be approximately 357,000 and the growth rate
3.67% per annum (average growth rate 1981-1998).
Water Analysis
Water quality parameters like color, taste, ph, turbidity, chloride, fluoride, nitrate, iron, manganese,
zinc, arsenic, TDS and microbial analysis were tested for the water points that installed after the flood.
Results and Discussion
Drainage system of the study area was badly damage by the 2010 flood as shown in fig 1 before the
intervention of the drainage system. The sewers were overflow frequently and suffer from poor
operation and maintenance. So this was creating the conditions for the spread of diarrhea, shigellosis
and also cholera that are endemic in this area. The stagnant water was a breeding site of mosquitoes
and other flies which was not only causing the visual nuisance but also presenting a pool of malarial
diseases. These issues solved by provision of drainage system. The community was involved in the
decision making and they were willing to have this improved sanitation facility. All the members of
benefiting communities were welcoming this participatory approach towards improved sanitation.
Key Factors of Success
The community was in a situation that they were ready to accept this intervention because the people
were in need of the facility. The community was sensitized to an extent that they welcome this
intervention. The outlet for the stagnant water was channelized to a water course where the grey water
could be easily used for the cultivation of the non vegetable crops.
Before intervention.
After intervention
Figure1. Shows the study area before and after intervention.
Main Obstacles
Various national and international humanitarian organizations were working on relief activities lead to
the absence of the community members during distribution of non food items. The various
organizations engaged the volunteers and the activities were slowed down for a day or two. The arising
conflicts and defiance between the members of the households lead to delayed activities in solving
these conflicts.
Page|2
1.2
8.8
0.5>
25
1.5
1.3
1.2
13.2
0.5>
25
1.5
0.6
1.5
8.8
0.5>
15
0.8
1.4
4.4
0.5>
30
0.5
0.7
1.2
22
0.5>
25
1.5
0.7
Conclusion
This improved sanitation facility was found very effective in terms of unity of the community because
a participatory approach was used. This approach was so successful that lead to need of more facilities
because before the intervention the community was unaware of the dreadful outcomes and the possible
waterborne diseases. Now they realized that improved sanitation is one of the important components
for the improvement of their health. In this way a glimpse of behavior change was observes when the
community demanded the same facility for the whole village.
References
1. Save the Children (2010). Rapid Assessment Report of Flood-Affected Communities in
D.G. Khan District, Punjab, Pakistan. Monitoring, Evaluation and Accountability Unit.
2.
http://www.pakmet.com.pk/FFD/index_files/rainfalljuly10.htm
3.
4.
Khan I, Yaqub A, Awais M, Asim H, Jamshed R and Farid I.A.. (2011).Monitoring of Fecal
Coliforms in Drinking Water Sources of Tehsil Mardan, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., vol.
43(3), pp. 600-601.
5.
Water and Sanitation program, (2008). Economic Impact of sanitation on south East Asia.
6.
PCRWR and UNICEF (2009) Water Safety Plans for Community Water Supply: A
resource manual.
7.
Asian Development Bank. ADB, (2008). Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Country environment
analysis.
Page|3