Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Tata Group
Type
Private
Industry
Conglomerate
Founded
1868
Founder(s)
Jamsetji Tata
Area served
Worldwide
Key people
Products
Revenue
Profit
Total assets
Owner(s)
Employees
455,947 (2011-12)[2]
Subsidiaries
List of subsidiaries
Website
www.tata.com
2 Subsidiaries
3 Acquisitions
4 Philanthropy
6 Recognition
7 See also
8 References
9 External links
[edit]List
J. R. D. Tata (19381991)
[edit]Subsidiaries
Main article: List of entities associated with Tata Group
Tata Bus
Tata Nano
This section lists the Tata companies and details their business:
Chemicals
Tata Chemicals
Rallis India
Brunner Mond
Advinus Therapeutics
Consumer Products
Tata Salt
I-shakti
Casa Dcor
Tata Swach
Tata Tea Limited is the world's second largest manufacturer of packaged tea and tea products.
Tata Ceramics
Tetley
Tata Coffee
Tata Industries
Titan Industries
Trent (Westside)
Tata Sky
TajAir
Tanishq
Tata Refractories
Westland
Energy
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd (Formerly Known as North Delhi Power Ltd)
Powerlinks Transmission
Tata Projects
Engineering
Hispano Carrocera
Tata Motors, manufacturer of commercial vehicles (largest in India) and passenger cars
Jaguar Land Rover (Manager of Tata's British brands Jaguar cars and Land Rover
Tata Projects
Tata Cummins
TRF
Tata Petrodyne
INCAT
Nelco
Nelito Systems
Tata Elxsi
Neotel
Tata Teleservices
Tata Communications
CMC Limited
Tata Teleservices
Services
Tata Sons
Ginger Hotels
Roots Corporation
Landmark Bookstores
Tata Limited
Tata AG
Tata Capital
Tata International AG
Mjunction services
Tata NYK
Tata Services
Taj Hotels
Steel
Tata Steel
JAMIPOL
NatSteel Holdings
Tata Metaliks
Tayo Rolls
TM International Logistics
Core Sciences
[edit]Acquisitions
March 2007 PT Kaltim Prima Coal (KPC) (Bumi Resources), $1.1 billion
[edit]Philanthropy
The Tata Group has helped establish and finance numerous quality research, educational and cultural
institutes in India.[10][11] The Tata Group was awarded the Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy in 2007 in recognition
of the group's long history of philanthropic activities.[12]Some of the institutes established by the Tata Group are:
Tata Trusts, a group of philanthropic organisations run by the head of the business conglomerate Tata
Sons[15]
The Energy and Resources Institute (earlier known as Tata Energy and Research Institute) a non
governmental research institute.
The Tata Group has donated a Rs. 220 crore ($50 million) to the prestigious Harvard Business School (HBS)
to build an academic and a residential building on the institutes campus in Boston, Massachusetts. The new
building will be called the Tata Hall and used for the institutes executive education programmes. [16] The amount
is the largest from an international donor in the business school's 102-year-old existence.
The recent The Brand Trust Report,[17] 2011 has ranked TATA as the second most trusted brands of India.
In a 2011 investor poll conducted by equity research firm Equitymaster, TATA Group was voted as the most
trustworthy among the Indian corporate houses.[18] Over 61% of the respondents "showed their confidence in
the Tata Group". The Tata Group retained its "Most Trustworthy" status in the 2012 edition of the poll.
One Tata project that brought together Tata Group companies (TCS, Titan Industries and Tata Chemicals) was
developing a compact, in-home water-purification device. It was called Tata swachwhich means clean
in Hindi and would cost less than 1000 rupees (US $21). The idea of Tata swach was thought of from the 2004
tsunami in the Indian Ocean, which left thousands of people without clean drinking water. This device has filters
that last about a year long for a family of five. It is a low-cost product available for people who have no access
to safe drinking water in their homes.[19]The advantage of this device is that it does not require the use of
electricity.[20]
TCS also designed and donated an innovative software package that teaches illiterate adults how to read in 40
hours. The children of the people who have been through our literacy program are all in school, says Pankaj
Baliga, global head of corporate social responsibility for TCS.[19]
In 1912, Tata Group expanded their CEOs concept of community philanthropy to be included in the workplace.
They instituted an eight-hour workday, before any other company in the world. In 1917, they recommended a
medical-services policy for Tata employees. The company would be among the first worldwide to organise
modern pension systems, workers compensation, maternity benefits, and profit-sharing plans.[19]
Trusts created by Tata Group control 65.8% of company shares,[21] so it can be said that about 66% of the
profits of Tata Group go to charity.[22] The charitable trusts of Tata Group fund a variety of projects, for example
the Tata Swach and the TCS project. They founded and still support such cherished institutions as the Indian
Institute of Science, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, the National Centre for the Performing Arts and
the Tata Memorial Hospital. Each Tata Group company channels more than 4 percent of its operating income
to the trusts and every generation of Tata family members has left a larger portion of its profit to them. [19]
After the Mumbai attacks, Salaries of then heavily attacked Taj Hotel employees were paid despite the hotel
being closed for reconstruction. About 1600 employees were provided food, water, sanitation and first aid
through employee outreach centres. Ratan Tata personally visited families of all the employees that were
affected. The employees relatives were flown to Mumbai from outside areas and were all accommodated for 3
weeks. Tata also covered compensation for railway employees, police staff, and pedestrians. The market
vendors and shop owners were given care and assistance after the attacks. A psychiatric institution was
established with the Tata Group of Social Science to counsel those who were affected from the attacks and
needed help. Tata also granted the education of 46 children of the victims of the terrorist attacks.[23][24]
[edit]Controversies
and criticisms
The Tata group has also attracted several controversies and criticisms, including the following below.
[edit]Munnar,
Kerala
The Kerala Government had filed an affidavit in the high court saying that Tata Tea had 'grabbed' forest land of
3,000 acres (12 km2) atMunnar. The Tatas, on the other hand, say they possess 58,741.82 acres
(237.7197 km2) of land, which they are allowed to retain under the Kannan Devan Hill (Resumption of Lands)
Act, 1971, and there is a shortage of 278.23 hectares in that. The then Chief Minister of Kerala V.S.
Achuthanandan, who vowed to evict all government land in Munnar, formed a special squad for the Munnar
land takeover mission and started acquiring back of the encroached government properties. However, later he
had to abort the mission as there were many influential land grabbers and faced opposition from his own party.
[edit]Kalinganagar,
Orissa
On 2 January 2006, policemen at Kalinganagar, Orissa, opened fire at a crowd of tribal villagers. The villagers
were protesting the construction of a compound wall on land historically owned by them, for a Tata steel plant.
Some of the corpses were returned to the families in a mutilated condition. When pushed for comment, TATA
officials said the incident was unfortunate but that it would continue with its plans to set up the plant. [25]
[edit]Dow
In November 2006, survivors of the Bhopal gas disaster were outraged by Ratan Tatas offer to bail out Union
Carbide and facilitate investments by Carbides new owner Dow Chemical. Tata had proposed leading a
charitable effort to clean up the toxic wastes abandoned by Carbide in Bhopal. At a time when the Government
of India has held Dow Chemical liable for the clean-up and requested Rs. 100 crores from the American MNC,
survivors groups felt that Tatas offer was aimed at frustrating legal efforts to hold the company liable, and
motivated by a desire to facilitate Dows investments in India.[26]
[edit]Supplies
Tata Motors reported deals to supply hardware and automobiles to Burmas oppressive and anti-democratic
military junta has come in for criticism from human rights and democracy activists. In December 2006, Gen.
Thura Shwe Mann, Myanmars chief of general staff visited the Tata Motors plant in Pune. [27] In 2009, TATA
Motors announced that it would press ahead with plans to manufacture trucks in Myanmar.[28][29]
[edit]Land
acquisition in Singur
The Singur controversy[30] in West Bengal led to further questions over Tatas social record, with protests by
locals and political parties(though the involvement of Mamata Banerjee's party is widely criticized as an act for
political gains) over the forced acquisition, eviction and inadequate compensation to those farmers displaced
for the Tata Nano plant. As the protests grew, and despite having the support of the Communist Party of India
(Marxist) state government, Tata eventually pulled the project out of West Bengal, citing safety concerns. The
Singur controversy was one of the few occasions when Ratan Tata was forced to publicly address criticisms
and concerns on any environmental or social issue. Ratan Tata subsequently embraced Narendra Modi,
the Chief Minister of Gujarat, who quickly made land available for the Nano project.[31]
[edit]Dhamra
Port
On the environmental front, the Port of Dhamara controversy has received significant coverage, both within
India and in Tatas emerging global markets.[32][33]
The Dhamra port, a venture between Tata Steel and Larsen & Toubro, has come in for criticism for its proximity
to the Gahirmatha Sanctuary and Bhitarkanika National Park, from Indian and international organisations,
including Greenpeace. Gahirmatha Beach is one of the worlds largest mass nesting sites for the Olive Ridley
Turtle and Bhitarkanika is a designated Ramsar site and Indias second largest mangrove forest. TATA officials
have denied that the port poses an ecological threat, and stated that mitigation measures are being employed
with the advice of the IUCN.[34] On the other hand, conservation organisations, including Greenpeace, have
pointed out that no proper Environment Impact Analysis has been done for the project, which has undergone
changes in size and specifications since it was first proposed and that the port could interfere with mass
nesting at the Gahirmtha beaches and the ecology of the Bitharkanika mangrove forest.[35][36]
Protests by Greenpeace to Dhamra Port construction is also alleged to be less on factual data and more on
hype and DPCL's (Dhamra Port Company Limited) response to Greenpeace questions harbours on these
facts.[37][38]
[edit]Soda
Tata group, along with a Tanzanian company, joined forces to build a soda ash extraction plant in
Tanzania.[39] The Tanzanian government is all for the project.[39] On the other hand, environmental activists are
opposing the plant because it would be near Lake Natron, and it could possibly affect the lake's ecosystem and
its neighbouring dwellers.[40]
Tata was planning to change the site of the plant so it would be built 32 km from the lake, but the opposition still
thinks it would negatively disturb the environment.[40] It could also jeopardise the Lesser Flamingo birds there,
which are already endangered. Lake Natron is where two thirds of Lesser Flamingos reproduce.[41] Producing
soda ash involves drawing out salt water from the lake, and then disposing the water back to the lake. This
process could interrupt the chemical make up of the lake.[39] Twenty-two African nations are against the
creation of the project and have signed a petition to stop its construction.[39]
[edit]Recognition
The international brand consultancy Brand Finance has ranked the over $100-billion conglomerate, Tata
Group, as 39th most valuable brand in the world.[42] The most recent Global 500 report by Brand Finance
shows that despite the controversies, Tata Group's brand value has soared to $15.08 billion for the current year
compared to $11.2 billion last year in 2010.