Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Global Financial Crisis of 2008
The global financial crisis of 2008 is a major ongoing financial crisis, the worst of its
kind since the Great Depression.
It became prominently visible in September 2008 with the failure, merger or conservator
ship of several large United States-based financial firms. The underlying causes leading
to the crisis had been reported in business journals for many months before September,
with commentary about the financial stability of leading US and European investment
banks, insurance firms and mortgage banks consequent to the sub-prime mortgage crisis.
Beginning with failures of large financial institutions in the United States, it rapidly
evolved into a global crisis resulting in a number of European banks' failures and declines
in various stock indexes, and significant reductions in the market-value of equities (stock)
and commodities worldwide. The crisis has led to a liquidity problem and the deleveraging of financial institutions especially in the United States and Europe, which
further accelerated the liquidity crisis. World political leaders and national ministers of
finance and central bank directors have coordinated their efforts to reduce fears, but the
crisis is ongoing and continues to change, evolving at the close of October 2008 into a
currency crisis with investors transferring vast capital resources into stronger currencies
such as the Yen, the Dollar and the Swiss Franc, leading many emergent economies to
seek aid from the International Monetary Fund. The crisis has roots in the sub-prime
mortgage crisis and is an acute phase of the financial crisis of 2007-2008.
10
11
12
Period
April - August
April - September 26
April - June
April - June
April - August
April - September 26
September 26, 2008
US $ Million
2007-08 2008-09
8,536
16,733
15,508
-6,421
6,990
1,559
1,804
2,173
13,375
48,583
247,762
8,127
-17,904
291,819
* Data on FIIS presented in this table represent inflows into the country and, thus, may
differ from data relating to net investment in stock exchanges by FIIs.
13
In the aftermath of the turmoil caused by bankruptcy, the Reserve Bank has announced a
series of measures to facilitate orderly operation of financial markets and to ensure
financial stability which predominantly includes extension of additional liquidity support
to banks.
14
16
17
18
20
Sampling Technique:
Simple Random Sampling
Analysis:
Technical analysis: Through the Tables and Graphs
Data:
Secondary data from 01-01-2009 to 01-02-2009
Interpretation:
Percentage of change of each company and represents the Average of change
to the whole sector movement of sector.
Sectorial movement shows whether the sector is positive or negative. And the
sector shows impact on Indian Stock Market.
21
1.4 Limitations
Sample Size is three sectors, which may not be able to show that exact picture
of the market.
We took three companys in each which may not be able show that exact
picture of the sector
Time period of sector is for thirty days which is to find out the market
movement
The fundamental news and company results may show the impact on the
study during the study period.
Sub prime crisis in still showing its impact on the market on few sector
majority
22
Ever since its inception in 1993, Net worth Stock Broking Limited
(NSBL) has sought to provide premium financial services and information,
so that the power of investment is vested with the client. We equip those
who invest with us to make intelligent investment decisions, providing them
with the flexibility to either tap into our extensive knowledge and expertise,
or make their own decisions. NSBL made its debut into the financial world
by servicing Institutional clients, and proved its high scalability of
operations by growing exponentially over a short period of time. Now,
powered by a top-notch research team and a network of experts, we provide
an array of retail broking services across the globe - spanning India, Middle
East, Europe and America. Currently, we are a Depository participant at
Central Depository Services India (CDSL) and aim to become one at
National Securities Depository (NSDL) by the end of this quarter. Our
strong support, technology-driven operations and business units of research,
distribution and advisory coalesce to provide you with a one-stop solution to
cater to all your broking and investment needs. Our customers have been
participating in the booming commodities markets with our membership at
the Multi Commodity Exchange of India (MCX) and National Commodity
& Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX) through Networth Stock.Com Ltd.
23
24
2.2INFRASTRUCTURE
A corporate office and 3 divisional offices in CBD of Mumbai which
houses state-of-the-art dealing room, research wing & management
and back offices.
All of 256 branches and franchisees are fully wired and connected to
hub at corporate office at Mumbai. Add on branches also will be wired
and connected to central hub
Web enabled connectivity and software in place for net trading.
200 operative IDs for dealing room
State of the Art accounting and billing system, on line risk
management system in place with 100% redundancy back up.
In house technology backs up team to ensure un-interrupted
connectivity.
25
26
Services
27
1 0 7 b ra n c h e s
28
Market Musing
Bullion Tracker
Economy Pulse
Company-Specific Reports
Result Update
Stock Stance
29
30
31
INTRODUCTION:
The seventh largest and second most popular country in the world, India has long been
considered a country of unrealized potential. A new spirit of economic freedom is now
stirring in the country, bringing sweeping changes in its wake. A series of ambitious
economic reforms aimed at deregulating the country and stimulating foreign investment
32
33
35
36
Securities market may be classified is by the types of securities bought and sold there.
The broadest classification is based upon whether the securities are new issues or are
already outstanding and owned by investors. Now we see following chart for
understanding market types.
Capital Market
Primary Market
Secondary Market
Organized
Exchanges
37
Over The
Counter
Primary market:
Securities available for the first time are offered through the primary securities markets.
The issuer may be a brand-new company or one that has been in business for many years.
The securities offered may be a new type for the issuer of additional amounts of a
securities used frequently in the past. In primary market funds are mobilized in the
primary market through prospectus, rights issues, and private placement.
Secondary market:
Once new issues have been purchased by investors, they change hands in the secondary
markets. This market also known as stock market. In India the secondary market consist
of recognized stock exchanges operating under rules, by-laws and regulations duly
approved by the government. There are actually two broad segments of the secondary
markets:
A. Organized market:
Organized exchange are physical marketplaces where the agents of buyers and sellers
operate thorough the auction process. There are number of organized exchanges in India.
NSE (National Stock Exchange) and BSE (Stock Exchange Mumbai) are main stock
exchange. Other than this there are more then 19 stock exchanges.
B. Over The Counter (OTC):
The OTC market is not a central physical marketplace but a collection of broker-dealer
scattered across the country. This market is more a way of doing business than a place.
Buying and selling inters in unlisted stocks are matched not through the auction process
on the floor of an exchange but through negotiated bidding, over a massive network of
telephone and teletype wires that link thousand of securities firms here and abroad.
38
DERIVATIVES:Derivatives are contracts that are based on or derived from some underlying asset,
reference rate, or index. Most common financial derivatives are forwards, futures, options
and swaps.
Derivatives trading commenced in India in June 2000 after SEBI granted the final
approval to this effect in May 2000 for trading in index futures. Currently, the Indian
markets provide equity derivatives of the following types:
Index Futures
Stock Futures
Index Options
Stock Options
Derivatives help to improve market efficiencies because risks can be isolated and sold to
those who are willing to accept them at the least cost. Using derivatives breaks risk into
pieces that can be managed independently. Corporations can keep the risks they are most
comfortable managing and transfer those they do not want to other companies that are
more willing to accept them. From a market-oriented perspective, derivatives offer the
free trading of financial risks.
Types of derivatives:
Forwards: it is a customized contract between two parties, where the settlement takes
place on a specific date in the future at the contract price.
Futures: it is an agreement between two parties to exchange commodity or financial
asset for a certain consideration after a specified period. Thee\se types of contracts are
exchange-traded.
Options: it is a type of contract which provides the buyer the right but not the obligation,
to buy or sell a specific asset or commodity at a specific price.\, on or before any time
prior to the specific date.
Warrants: options with longer maturity are refereed to as warrants.
Baskets: these are options on portfolio of underlying assets.
Swaps: it is a contract whereby the parties agree to exchange a predetermined series of
payments, or exchange interest payments or one set of interest payment with another, for
a specified time.
40
One of the important functions of the futures market is to provide hedging facilities to
hedge price risk. This market also provides scope to speculators due to low transaction
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
growth f its major components in January 2008 are less than half of that recorded in
January 2007.
However, the cumulative industrial growth for the period April-January 2007-08 looks
marginally better at 8.7 per cent, as compared to 11.2 per cent for the same period last
fiscal. Manufacturing for the period April-January 2007-08 clocked a 9.2 per cent growth
as compared to 12.1 per cent for the same period a year ago. Mining showing a marginal
downturn clocked a growth of 4.6 per cent for the period April-January 2007- 08 as
against 4.8 per cent for the same period last year. Growth in electricity also declined to
6.3 per cent in April-January 2007-08 from 7.6 per cent in April-January 2006-07. A
glance at the use-based classification suggests that deceleration in industrial growth is
most pronounced in the consumer durable sector as it recorded a negative growth of 3.1
per cent in January 2008.
However, what is more distressing and disappointing is the 2.1 per cent growth clocked
by the capital goods sector. It may be worthwhile to point out that despite the dismal
performance of rate sensitive consumer durable sector; it is the sustained double-digit
growth of capital goods sector that was keeping the sentiments positive about the future
prospect of industrial growth. While a blip in the growth of capital goods sector for one
month is too early to represent a downturn in investment, it is definitely a cause for
concern- more so, if consumption side is already reeling under a downturn.
At 2-digit classification, out of 17 industries only two industries namely wood & wood
products and machinery & equipment recorded negative growth in January 2008 as
compared to just one industry - jute & fibre textiles in January 2007. However, what is
more striking about the growth pattern of industries at 2-digit level is wide variation in
growth across industries in January 2008. Some of the industry categories that recorded
65
Inflation
The tight monetary policy by the RBI has managed to contain the headline inflation
(measured in terms of the WPI) to 2.97 per cent for the week ended October 27, 2007 but
mainly on account of a larger base. For the first time in five years, a level of below 3 per
cent was attained. Inflation has been ruling below 4 per cent since August 18, 2007 after
touching 6.69 per cent earlier in 2007. It was ruling at 3.50 per cent for three consecutive
weeks and rose to 3.79 per cent as on January 5, 2008. The rise was mainly on account of
rise in prices of some manufactured products including metals and alloys. It further rose
to 3.83 per cent as on January 12, 2008 on account of rise in food prices. The point-topoint rate of inflation based on the All India Consumer Price Index Industrial Workers
(CPI-IW) Index (base year: 2001) remained at 5.51 per cent in November 2007. Even
global commodity and food prices are causing price pressures. The Food & Agriculture
Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations has predicted that food prices would be rising
at a higher rate in the next 5-10 years than in the past, adversely impacting those
economies that have accorded higher weights to the food index in the inflation basket. In
India, food items account for 57 per cent in consumer index (CPI) and 26.94 per cent
(primary and manufactured products) in the wholesale index (WPI) that is used to
measure inflation. Global outlook for edible oils is also tight for the year 2008.
Crude oil had touched $98.62 per barrel mark in the U.S in the first week of November
2007. It crossed the $99 per barrel mark by peaking at $99.29 per barrel on November 21,
2007. On January 2, 2008, crude oil futures touched the psychological mark of $100 per
barrel on apprehensions that inventories might have fallen in the U.S for a seventh week
in a row. On the demand side, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) has
66
67
Inflation in India in 2008 will depend much on how the food prices behave globally and
how much of the increase in oil prices will be passed on to the consumers. Also, rising
subsidies in food, fertilizers and petroleum are a major concern and needs to be
addressed. Thirdly, India imports 70 per cent of its crude oil requirements.
There are yet concerns on the demand-supply mismatch pertaining to agriculture-based
items. It is also expected that the government might go in for imports of some of the
agricultural commodities in case there is a shortfall especially in the case of wheat. The
London-based International Grains Council has made a preliminary forecast for global
68
FINANCIAL MARKETS:
i Foreign Exchange
The past few months has witnessed quite a few landmark highs of the rupee against the
dollar. The rupee breached the 40 levels for the first time in September 2007 when it
touched 39.90. On November 7, 2007, the rupee touched a 10-year high of 39.16 and then
moved back down at the end of the trading session. The stock market fallout on January
17-18, 2008 on account of FIIs drawing out dollars has caused the rupee to depreciate,
and settle at 39.38 versus the greenback as on January 21, 2008. The rupee sustained at
39.39 on January 31, 2008, mainly on account of continued inflows, despite some
downward pressure of refunds for Reliance Power IPO.
The forward premia has remained positive throughout not nearing the 0 level implying
that the sentiments are towards a weakening rupee and consequently a strengthening
dollar. On January 17-18, 2008, the RBI intervened in the forex market through swap
transactions, with the first leg being a spot transaction (buy) and the other being a
forward transaction (sell). The reason for carrying swap trades was to postpone infusion
69
70
71
Heavy volumes were witnessed on January 18, 2008 to the tune of Rs. 29.85 billion,
which resulted in a massive fall in yields. The yield on the 10-year benchmark bond was
7.55 per cent. Concurrently, it was the day of closing for the Reliance Power IPO coupled
with failure in the RTGS system, which drained out liquidity from the system, causing
call rates to break-out the interest rate corridor to touch 60 per cent. On January 21, yields
rose 2 basis points up at 7.57 per cent on expectations of inflationary pressures and
issuance of MSS bonds worth Rs. 60,000 million on January 23, 2008. Feds 75 basis
point emergency rate cut on January 22, 2008 led to the 10-year benchmark yield touch a
2-year low of 7.29 per cent (on January 23, 2008).
But, on January 28, 2008, the yields bounced back to 7.45 per cent on expectations that
the RBI would cut rates in its quarterly Monetary Review Policy announcement. On
January 29, 2008, the yields jumped to 7.52 per cent, the weeks high, on similar
72
73
74
As the loans increased, the banks bundled them as securities in order to spread the
loans and mitigate their risks.
The banks managed to get AAA certification from rating agencies for these
securities. Rating agencies based on the growth potential fo the underlying assets
went along with the banks without a thorough credit check of the constituents of
the securities.
Thus these high rated papers got distributed to various investors in the market.
Investment banks themselves were one set of active investors in these papers.
Since the underlying assets were appreciating year on year, they were lured into
making more investments in these papers.
They even borrowed to fund these investments since it was looking very hunky
dory all the way. After all inflation was under check, interest rates wre attractive
and hence loans were cheap. Leveraging made immense sense to the participants.
The sub-prime securities were used as collateral for the funds borrowed.
75
The price of the securities soared on the back of increasing demand aided by the
liquidity glut.
Every thing looked fine till the growth in housing started to slow down and the
sub prime nature of the loans got exposed. Once borrowers saw the house prices
declining defaults on these loans started.
By the time sanity dawned, it was too late. The mess stared at the lenders of
housing loan. A large number of borrowers were of sub-prime nature incapable of
paying back their loans. This coupled with falling asset value spelt problems for
the financial system.
The securities, which essentially mirrored these assets, likewise lost value.
The highly leveraged investment banks holding on the large quantities of sub
prime securities tried to redeem themselves by liquidating them in order settle
their debt outstanding.
76
NEXT STRATEGIES
On January 29, 2008, the IMF has downgraded its global growth projections at 4.1 per
cent in 2008 from 4.9 per cent in 2007, mainly on account of lower growth projections of
the advanced economies. While the Indian economy has begun its journey on the growth
path, there are questions being raised on the pace of this journey? If GDP growth would
moderate to 8.5-8.9 per cent as is being ascertained by different quarters, this indicates
that growth in the remaining two quarters would decline to 8-8.6 per cent. This is
substantially lower than performance of the first two quarters. This may be attributed to
decline in exports, decline in domestic demand, which is interestingly coupled with a
resilient growth in investment demand. While economic theory (Annexure I) endorses the
view that investment demand creates domestic demand, its practical implication remains
to be seen. But, currently the picture is lull as the latest manufacturing data has just been
released. Domestic liquidity remains strong but there are few takers at the current interest
rates.
On January 30, 2008, Federal Reserve once again cut the federal funds rate by 50 basis
points to 3 per cent from 3.50 per cent. On January 22, 2008, it had cut the rate by 75
basis points from 4.25 per cent. This is the third time that the Federal Reserve has cut
rates in the last two months. On January 29, RBI left its key interest rates unchanged at
the Q3 Monetary Policy Review. Postfacto, concerns have been raised on the increasing
interest rate differential between the two countries. But, there is not enough evidence to
state that the interest differential between India and the U.S. is the sole driver of inflows.
Therefore, quite contrary to Feds decision, RBIs decision of not going in for a rate cut in
this review was quite expected. The reason being that there are persisting inflationary
pressures in the economy despite the pressures of global softening of rates. At the same
77
Date
Prev
Close
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
EQ
1-Jan-09
998.35
996
1,019.80
996
1,014.15
1,013.75
EQ
2-Jan-09
1,013.75
1,020.00
1,032.00
1,003.20
1,016.00
1,015.65
EQ
5-Jan-09
1,015.65
1,030.00
1,049.50
1,028.05
1,049.50
1,044.10
EQ
6-Jan-09
1,044.10
1,044.15
1,113.00
1,034.00
1,110.30
1,100.40
EQ
7-Jan-09
1,100.40
1,115.00
1,125.25
996
1,024.25
1,009.25
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
16-Jan09
19-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
1,009.25
1,000.00
1,057.00
975
1,013.00
1,017.50
1,017.50
1,012.00
1,022.00
990
1,004.20
1,003.70
1,003.70
1,000.00
1,012.00
975.1
990
988.85
988.85
1,044.70
1,044.70
966.9
973.9
977.55
977.55
960
960
907.05
920.4
924.8
924.8
938
944.55
922.2
939
937.55
937.55
949
954.5
931.5
940
941.1
941.1
925
925
902
914
912.45
912.45
906.8
906.8
880
883.15
889.45
889.45
900
917
882
893
900.5
900.5
892.6
911.3
865.1
873
872.45
872.45
897
903.95
880
890
889.45
889.45
898
915.8
895.35
912
911.75
911.75
924.9
937.55
910
921.05
923.45
923.45
892.4
935
892.4
922
925.6
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
78
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the HDFC Bank has ended up
with negative from 1,013.75to 925.6, and this shows a negative impact on the overall
Bank sectors.
79
Date
Prev
Close
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
EQ
1-Jan-09
67.7
69
70
67.5
69.55
69.7
EQ
2-Jan-09
69.7
71
73.25
69.35
72.3
72.15
EQ
5-Jan-09
72.15
74
74.4
71
72.7
72.55
EQ
6-Jan-09
72.55
72.65
73.95
69.2
71.75
71.45
EQ
7-Jan-09
71.45
72
72.35
62
65.85
66.5
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
16-Jan09
19-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
66.5
64
68.1
63
65.3
64.65
64.65
64
65.3
60.2
61.6
61.5
61.5
63
64.9
60
62
61.25
61.25
62.45
63.8
60.6
62.4
62
62
60.5
61.75
58
59.2
59.25
59.25
60
60.5
58.75
60
59.9
59.9
59.95
60.85
59
60
60.4
60.4
58.7
59.5
58.05
58.4
58.3
58.3
58.3
58.3
56.05
56.3
56.3
56.3
56.8
58
54.6
55.25
55.4
55.4
56.9
56.9
50.6
54.05
53.7
53.7
55
56.7
54.1
55.5
55.45
55.45
56.25
56.9
55.45
56.45
56.35
56.35
57.7
57.8
55.65
57
56.7
56.7
55.2
57.75
54.05
56.85
57.15
80
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the IDBI Bank has ended up
with negative from 69.7to 57.15, and this shows a negative impact on the overall
Bank sectors.
81
Date
Prev
Close
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
EQ
1-Jan-09
448.1
450
466.95
450
465
464.15
EQ
2-Jan-09
464.15
465
479.8
462.25
472.55
471.25
EQ
5-Jan-09
471.25
475.5
504
474.15
500.9
499.9
EQ
6-Jan-09
499.9
480
530.7
480
526
523.45
EQ
7-Jan-09
523.45
528
538.6
454.05
462.5
467.85
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
16-Jan09
19-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
467.85
458.7
483
441
445.8
456.6
456.6
440
463.3
428.2
442
438
438
435
448.4
418.05
428.85
425.45
425.45
428.65
451
428.65
443.35
441.1
441.1
429
429
398.3
410.55
408.65
408.65
415
427.7
408.65
420.4
423.75
423.75
425
444.4
408.5
412.35
412.6
412.6
403
407.8
390.25
395.8
396.3
396.3
389.7
389.7
360
366.6
369.35
369.35
381.95
385.9
358.75
380.05
378.05
378.05
331.55
391
331.55
365.9
363.85
363.85
372.95
389
359.1
380
381.1
381.1
386.95
412.5
382.45
410.9
408.05
408.05
430
433.7
402.6
404
410.1
410.1
402
418.9
395
415.25
416.25
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
82
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the ICICI Bank has ended up
with negative from 464.15to 416.25, and this shows a negative impact on the overall
Bank sectors.
83
S.NO
COMPANY NAME
AVERAGE
HDFC
959.96
IDBI
61.53
ICICI
427.79
84
S.NO
COMPANY NAME
CHANGE IN %
HDFC
-9.52
IDBI
-21.95
ICICI
-11.5
85
86
Impact
Reimbursement by the government for loan waiver of farmers of Rs.60, 000 will be in 3
years have a neutral impact on PSU banks as they will be able to write off these loans &
show a cleaner balance sheet in 2009. But, PSU banks are expected to face pressure on
their net interest margins until the subsidy for waiver of agricultural loans and one time
settlement of loans is released from the government. The cost of adding more rural
households in their rural branches may increase the operating cost for the PSU banks.
Whereas, banks that receive dividend from their subsidiaries will benefit from the set off
of dividend distribution tax & the creation of fund in NABARD, SIDBI & NHB and
withdrawn of BCTT are the favorable steps. However, no measures were taken to comply
with Basel II guidelines as PSU banks need huge cheap capital but stringent restrictions
on FII/FDI participation & structural hurdles like restrictions on capital availability (due
to high government ownership), restrictions on credit deployment and restrictive labour
laws, weak corporate governance have impaired the ability of public sector banks.
87
Date
Prev
Close
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
EQ
1-Jan-09
70.05
70.25
71.7
69.8
70.55
70.75
EQ
2-Jan-09
70.75
71.75
72
67.85
69.5
69.1
EQ
5-Jan-09
69.1
70.5
71.6
68.25
70.05
70.1
EQ
6-Jan-09
70.1
70.5
78.4
69.1
77.3
76.4
EQ
7-Jan-09
76.4
78.65
79.2
71
72.35
72.2
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
16-Jan09
19-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
72.2
71
74.5
69
72.9
72.65
72.65
72
73.75
67.1
69.5
69.35
69.35
68.8
71.65
68
71.65
70.5
70.5
71
72.45
70.05
71.8
71.95
71.95
70
70.55
68
69
69.1
69.1
69.9
71.9
69
71
70.75
70.75
71.75
74
70.1
73.95
73.3
73.3
73.5
73.5
69
69.05
69.6
69.6
68.1
71.75
68.1
70.9
70.6
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
88
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
70.6
71
71.8
68.6
69.35
70.05
70.05
69.85
69.9
65.1
67.4
66.1
66.1
66.75
72
66.75
69.3
69.6
69.6
70.1
72
69.55
70.8
70.75
70.75
71.5
72.4
67.1
67.75
67.9
67.9
68.4
71.45
66.5
70.6
70.85
89
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the Ambuja Cement has
ended up with negative from 70.75to 70.85, and this shows a negative impact on the
overall Cement sectors.
90
Series
Date
Prev
Close
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
EQ
1-Jan-09
126.1
148.8
148.8
126
146.9
144.95
EQ
2-Jan-09
144.95
135
149.9
131
138.1
138.25
EQ
5-Jan-09
138.25
132
144.75
127.35
141.9
140.75
EQ
6-Jan-09
140.75
139.5
147.35
137
142.5
144.45
EQ
7-Jan-09
144.45
140.25
140.25
140
140
140
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
140
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
131.6
131.6
131.6
131.6
131.6
131.6
132
132.95
126
132.95
132.95
132.95
131
132
131
132
132
132
131.9
131.9
131.9
131.9
131.9
131.9
131
131
131
131
131
131
135.7
137.55
130.5
130.5
130.9
130.9
125.4
131
125.4
127.5
127.5
127.5
122
132
122
131.9
132
132
130
135.95
130
135.95
135.95
135.95
130.2
139.9
130.2
138
138.95
138.95
132.05
140
132.05
140
140
140
133.05
133.05
133.05
133.05
133.05
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
91
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the Deccan Cement has ended
up with negative from 144.95 to133.05, and this shows a negative impact on the
overall Cement sectors.
92
Series
Date
Prev
Close
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
EQ
1-Jan-09
97.7
99
101.35
97
100.6
EQ
2-Jan-09
100.3
102
104.9
99.25
102.9
102.8
EQ
5-Jan-09
102.8
105
106.9
103.6
106.4
106.25
EQ
6-Jan-09
106.25
107
121
105.25
121
118.95
EQ
7-Jan-09
118.95
124
124.9
110.2
116.2
117.7
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
16-Jan09
19-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
117.7
110
123.55
110
113
114.95
114.95
123.35
123.35
110.55
114.75
113.4
113.4
113
117.9
104.45
106.9
106.45
106.45
108.2
112.25
108.1
111.2
110.8
110.8
101
110
99.75
106.5
105.05
105.05
104.3
110
102.1
105
105.55
105.55
100
109.8
100
108.3
108.05
108.05
108
108.8
104.05
107.05
107.1
107.1
106.45
107.95
103.05
104.1
103.65
103.65
105.35
108.5
101
101.5
102.1
102.1
101
104.9
98.6
101.5
101.7
101.7
102
104.8
99.15
99.95
99.9
99.9
100
108.6
90.65
106.8
105.9
105.9
105.5
108.9
99.5
100.35
100.35
100.35
99.5
104.3
99.5
102
102
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
93
100.3
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the India Cement has ended
up with negative from 100.3 to102 , and this shows a negative impact on the overall
Cement sectors
94
S.NO
COMPANY
AVERAGE
AMBUJA
70.58
DECCAN
122.23
INDIA
203.13
95
S.NO
COMPANY
CHANGE IN %
AMBUJA
0.14
DECCAN
-8.94
INDIA
1.66
96
Series
Date
Prev
Close
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
EQ
1-Jan-09
11
11.45
11.55
11.05
11.55
11.5
EQ
2-Jan-09
11.5
12
12.1
11.65
12.1
12.1
97
5-Jan-09
12.1
12.7
12.75
12.1
12.75
12.75
EQ
6-Jan-09
12.75
13
13.25
12.2
12.5
12.35
EQ
7-Jan-09
12.35
12.5
12.8
11.15
11.15
11.2
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
16-Jan09
19-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
11.2
10.5
10.5
10.1
10.25
10.35
10.35
10.25
10.4
10
10.05
10.2
10.2
10.3
10.5
10.05
10.1
10.1
10.1
10.25
10.7
10.25
10.6
10.6
10.6
10.95
10.95
10
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.2
10.65
9.75
10
10.1
10.1
10.1
10.45
10.1
10.15
10.2
10.2
10.25
11
10
10.8
10.75
10.75
10.45
10.95
9.85
10.3
10.3
10.3
10.3
10.65
9.85
10.1
10
10
10
10.2
9.55
10
9.9
9.9
10.55
10.85
10.3
10.6
10.6
10.6
10.45
11
10.2
10.7
10.5
10.5
10.65
10.8
10
10
10.15
10.15
10.05
10.5
10
10.25
10.4
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
98
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the Birla Power has ended up
with negative from 11.5 to 10.4, and this shows a negative impact on the overall
Power sectors
Series
Date
99
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
EQ
1-Jan-09
49.75
50.9
51.95
50.9
51.95
51.95
EQ
2-Jan-09
51.95
52.8
55
52.8
53.15
53.15
EQ
5-Jan-09
53.15
53
58.5
53
58
57.6
EQ
6-Jan-09
57.6
58.8
58.8
53.15
54.05
54.05
EQ
7-Jan-09
54.05
55
55.45
49.4
50
50
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
16-Jan09
19-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
50
48
49.5
46.7
46.7
47.6
47.6
46.7
50.95
46.55
46.55
46.6
46.6
52.75
54
45.8
46.6
46.85
46.85
47.55
50.8
47.55
48.6
49.4
49.4
59
59
48.3
48.5
48.5
48.5
47.05
52.4
47.05
48.15
48.15
48.15
47.2
49
47
47
47.5
47.5
46.2
46.2
46.2
46.2
46.2
46.2
48.5
48.5
44
44
45.25
45.25
47
49
41.6
42
42.2
42.2
40
44.85
39.15
43.4
42.6
42.6
41.55
43.2
37
37
39.15
39.15
38
39.65
36
39.65
39.65
39.65
47
47
40.2
42.6
42.6
42.6
41.75
42
37
39
39.35
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
100
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the IMP Power has ended up
with negative from 51.95 to 39.35, and this shows a negative impact on the overall
Power sectors
Date
101
Open
Price
High
Price
Low
Price
Last
Price
Close
Price
123.35
EQ
1-Jan-09
119.95
121.5
124.25
116.7
123.25
EQ
2-Jan-09
123.35
123.9
125.8
123.05
123.25
123.5
EQ
5-Jan-09
123.5
125
126.25
121.1
125
124.55
EQ
6-Jan-09
124.55
124.65
127.95
121
123.95
123.55
EQ
7-Jan-09
123.55
124.5
125.45
110.75
112.5
112.8
EQ
9-Jan-09
12-Jan09
13-Jan09
14-Jan09
15-Jan09
16-Jan09
19-Jan09
20-Jan09
21-Jan09
22-Jan09
23-Jan09
27-Jan09
28-Jan09
29-Jan09
30-Jan09
112.8
112
120
99
106.85
106.7
106.7
106.05
107.25
102.05
102.95
102.95
102.95
103
105
96.2
98.15
97.8
97.8
98.55
108.9
95.5
107.5
102.4
102.4
101
101.35
97.15
98.35
98.9
98.9
98.25
102.2
98.25
100.5
101
101
101.5
103.95
100.75
101.05
101.65
101.65
100
104.9
98.05
101.6
102.5
102.5
100
103.6
99.25
99.7
100.35
100.35
101
102.4
98
98.25
98.5
98.5
97.85
99.9
97.25
98.15
98.05
98.05
101
102.35
99.25
100.7
100.55
100.55
101.85
103.5
100.2
102.5
102.6
102.6
104
108.65
102.5
103.9
104.5
104.5
103
107.4
101.7
105.85
106.4
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
102
From the above graph and table we can conclude that the Reliance Power has ended
up with negative from 123.35 to106.4, and this shows a negative impact on the
overall Power sectors
103
S.NO
COMPANY
AVERAGE
BIRLA
10.72
IMP
46.91
RELIANCE
106.63
104
S.NO
COMPANY
CHANGE IN %
BIRLA
-10.57
IMP
-32.02
RELIANCE
-15.93
6.1 FINDINGS
106
We can conclude that the HDFC Bank has ended up with negative from
1,013.75to 925.6, and this shows a negative impact on the overall Banking
sectors.
We can conclude that the IDBI Bank has ended up with negative from 69.7to
57.15, and this shows a negative impact on the overall Banking sectors.
We can conclude that the ICICI Bank has ended up with negative from
464.15to 416.25, and this shows a negative impact on the overall Banking
sectors.
We can conclude that the Ambuja Cement has ended up with negative from
70.75to 70.85, and this shows a negative impact on the overall Cement
sectors.
We can conclude that the Deccan Cement has ended up with negative from
144.95 to133.05, and this shows a negative impact on the overall Cement
sectors.
We can conclude that the India Cement has ended up with negative from
100.3 to102, and this shows a negative impact on the overall Cement sectors
107
We can conclude that the IMP Power has ended up with negative from 51.95
to 39.35, and this shows a negative impact on the overall Power sectors
We can conclude that the Reliance Power has ended up with negative from
123.35 to106.4, and this shows a negative impact on the overall Power sectors
108
6.2 Questionnaires
[]
[]
[]
4.How can retail investors help to over come on the Economical Crisis? []
A) More participating
B) Slight participation
C) Not participation
D) None of the above
5.What is the Major effect on this crisis?
A) Un employment
B) Negative profits
C) Effect on secondary market
D) All the above
[]
[]
109
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
12.What is the reason of the RRB always decreasing CRR, SLR, Repo and
Reverse Repo rate?
[]
A) Getting income in to the Indian Economy
B) Over come on this Financial Crisis
C) Benefits for the Banking
D) Providing for highest Investment
[]
A) 9
B) 10.6
C) 11.68
D) 0.18
14.When Net-worth stock Broking Ltd was established?
A) 1950
B) 1993
C) 1995
D) 1990
[]
[]
111
112
113
6.4 BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Web sites:
www.investopidia.com
www.nseindia.com
www.bseindia.com
www.networthdirect.com
COMPANY PROFILE:
Collected from the companys website www.NSBLindia.com
114