Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

DOI 10.1007/s40368-014-0117-0

ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE

Root canal morphology of primary molars: a micro-computed

tomography study
A. C. Fumes M. D. Sousa-Neto G. B. Leoni
M. A. Versiani L. A. B. da Silva
R. A. B. da Silva A. Consolaro

Received: 18 September 2013 / Accepted: 23 January 2014

European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2014

Abstract
Aim This was to investigate the root canal morphology of
primary molar teeth using micro-computed tomography.
Methods Primary maxillary (n = 20) and mandibular
(n = 20) molars were scanned at a resolution of 16.7 lm
and analysed regarding the number, location, volume, area,
structured model index (SMI), area, roundness, diameters,
and length of canals, as well as the thickness of dentine in
the apical third. Data were statistically compared by using
paired-sample t test, independent sample t test, and oneway analysis of variance with significance level set as 5 %.
Results Overall, no statistical differences were found
between the canals with respect to length, SMI, dentine
thickness, area, roundness, and diameter (p [ 0.05). A
double canal system was observed in the mesial and mesiobuccal roots of the mandibular and maxillary molars,
respectively. The thickness in the internal aspect of the
roots was lower than in the external aspect. Cross-sectional
evaluation of the roots in the apical third showed flatshaped canals in the mandibular molars and ribbon- and
oval-shaped canals in the maxillary molars.

A. C. Fumes
L. A. B. da Silva
R. A. B. da Silva

A. Consolaro
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirao
Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Av. do Cafe s/no, Bairro Monte
Alegre, Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto CEP 14049-904, Brazil
M. D. Sousa-Neto (&)
G. B. Leoni
M. A. Versiani
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirao
Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Av. do Cafe s/no, Bairro Monte
Alegre, Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto CEP 14049-904, Brazil
e-mail: sousanet@forp.usp.br
M. D. Sousa-Neto
Rua Celia de Oliveira Meirelles 350, Sao Paulo,
Ribeirao Preto CEP 14024-070, Brazil

Conclusions External and internal anatomy of the primary first molars closely resemble the primary second
molars. The reported data may help clinicians to obtain a
thorough understanding of the morphological variations of
root canals in primary molars to overcome problems related to shaping and cleaning procedures, allowing appropriate management strategies for root canal treatment.
Keywords Deciduous teeth
Dental pulp cavity
Microcomputed tomography
Primary molars

Introduction
The premature loss of primary teeth may cause changes in
the chronology and sequence of eruption of permanent
teeth; thus, saving teeth in children is an important concept
and frequently involves endodontic treatment (Cleghorn
et al. 2012). Root canal treatment in primary teeth includes
the removal of the pulp tissue, debridement and preparation, irrigation, and filling of the canals. The main objective
of pulp therapy in primary teeth is to maintain the integrity
and health of the teeth and their supporting tissues (Cleghorn et al. 2012). To accomplish this goal, a comprehensive understanding of the root and the root canal
morphology of primary teeth is of utmost importance
(Hibbard and Ireland 1957; Goodacre 2003; Zoremchhingi
et al. 2005; Aminabadi et al. 2008; Bagherian et al. 2010;
Cleghorn et al. 2012).
The external and internal morphology of primary teeth
are different in many aspects from permanent successors
(Kavanagh and OSullivan 1998; Goodacre 2003; Johnston
and Franklin 2006; Cleghorn et al. 2012). Generally, primary teeth with fully developed roots exhibit a less complex root canal system compared to permanent teeth, with

123

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

one canal per root. In primary molars, the complexity of

this system may increase over time due to the formation of
secondary dentine and narrowing of the canal system and
eventually the resorption process (Hibbard and Ireland
1957).
Traditionally, root canal anatomy of primary teeth has
been described in case reports (Badger 1982; Falk and
Bowers 1983; Caceda et al. 1994; Winkler and Ahmad
1997; Kavanagh and OSullivan 1998; Eden et al. 2002)
and in ex vivo studies using injection of materials (Simpson 1973), dye perfusion (Ringelstein and Seow 1989),
digital radiographs, longitudinal and transverse cross-sectioning, histology (Poornima 2008), clearing technique
(Bagherian et al. 2010), scanning electron microscope
(Wrbas et al. 1997), and conventional computed tomography (Zoremchhingi et al. 2005). These methodologies have
been successfully used for many years in the anatomical
study of the root canal system; however, most of them are
invasive or only provide a two-dimensional image of a
three-dimensional structure, and therefore may not accurately reflect the morphology of the object being studied.
Thus, these inherent methodological limitations encouraged the search for new methods able to produce improved
results (Peters et al. 2000).
In recent years, significant technological advances for
imaging teeth have been introduced. Their non-invasive
nature allows the use of teeth for other purposes or as
controls for further treatment procedures. The development
of the high-resolution X-ray micro-computed tomography
(micro-CT) has gained increasing significance in the study
of dental tissues. Micro-CT offers a non-invasive reproducible technique for three-dimensional assessment of the
root canal system and it can be applied both quantitatively
and qualitatively (Peters et al. 2000; Siqueira et al. 2010;
Versiani et al. 2011, 2012, 2013).
Even though there has been a growing body of research and
publications on the dental anatomy of primary teeth (Goodacre
2003; Cleghorn et al. 2012), a detailed quantitative description
of the anatomy of their root canal system is still lacking.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the morphometric aspects of the external and internal anatomy of
primary mandibular and maxillary molars, using high-resolution three-dimensional micro-CT analysis.

Materials and methods

Sample selection
After approval from the local ethics in research committee
(CAAE #0072.0.130.000-09), primary mandibular (n = 20)
and maxillary (n = 20) molars, extracted for reasons not
related to this study and stored in 0.1 % thymol solution,

123

were selected. For each group of teeth, ten first and ten
second primary molars were evaluated. The inclusion criteria comprised only molars with no physiological root
resorption or at its initial stages, i.e. in which resorption did
not exceed 1/3 of root length.
Micro-CT scanning and reconstruction
Each tooth was slightly dried, mounted on a custom
attachment, and scanned in a micro-CT scanner (SkyScan
1174v2; Bruker-microCT, Kontich, Belgium) at an isotropic resolution of 16.7 lm. The X-ray tube was operated at
50 kV and 800 mA, and the scanning was performed by
180 rotation around the vertical axis with a rotation step of
1, using a 0.5-mm-thick aluminium filter. Images of each
specimen were reconstructed with dedicated software
(NRecon v.1.6.6; Bruker-microCT) providing axial cross
sections of the inner structure of the samples.
Quantitative analysis
DataViewer v.1.4.4 software (Bruker-microCT) was used
to evaluate the length (in millimetres) of the root from the
apex, and the length of the main root canals from the apical
foramen to the level of the cementoenamel junction. Threedimensional evaluation of the root canals (volume, surface
area, and structure model index) was performed from the
apex to the canal orifice using CTAn v.1.12 software
(Bruker-microCT). Volume was calculated as that of binarised objects within the volume of interest. For the
measurement of the surface area of the 3D multilayer
dataset, two components to surface measured in 2D were
used: first, the perimeters of the binarised objects on each
cross-sectional level, and second, the vertical surfaces
exposed by pixel differences between adjacent cross sections. Structure model index (SMI) involves a measurement of surface convexity in a 3D structure. SMI is derived
as 6.(S.V)/S2), where S is the object surface area before
dilation and S is the change in surface area caused by
dilation. V is the initial, undilated object volume. An ideal
plate, cylinder and sphere have SMI values of 0, 3 and 4,
respectively (Peters et al. 2000).
The smallest thickness of dentine in the internal and
external aspects of the roots, at 1, 2 and 3 mm from the
apical resorption bevel, were also recorded. Measurements
of the dentine thickness were taken from the external limit
of the root canal to the surface of the root. At these same
levels, CTAn v.1.12 software (Bruker-microCT) was used
for the two-dimensional evaluation (area, roundness,
major diameter, and minor diameter) of the root canal.
Area was calculated using the Pratt algorithm (Pratt
1991). The cross-sectional appearance, round or more
ribbon shaped, was expressed as roundness. Roundness of

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

Table 1 Mean (SD) of the morphometric 3D data in each root of primary maxillary and mandibular molars
n

Root canal

Root length (mm)

Canal length (mm)

Volume (mm3)

Surface area (mm2)

SMI

10

7.3 1.5

6.1 1.5

5.4 3.6

36.1 12.7a

2.0 0.4

28.0 15.6b

1.9 0.4

Mandibular
First molar

D
Second molar

10

6.4 1.9

4.7 2.5

4.6 4.4

8.5 1.1

7.0 1.8

6.6 2.7

58.7 20.3

1.7 0.5

8.9 2.0b

6.7 2.3

9.6 3.5b

65.9 18.3b

1.6 0.3

MB

7.9 1.1

6.5 2.3

2.8 2.1

24.5 7.9

2.1 0.6

DB

6.7 1.7

5.4 1.5

1.3 1.6

11.4 6.9a

2.1 0.5

5.9 1.8

4.6 1.9

2.9 2.5a

17.9 7.5a

2.7 0.3

Maxillary
First molar

Second molar

10

10

MB

8.5 1.4

6.3 1.9

3.2 1.6

31.0 12.0

1.8 0.6

DB
P

6.5 1.6
7.4 1.4

5.7 1.4
5.9 1.8

2.0 1.0
5.4 2.6b

22.2 11.5b
31.8 11.6b

2.0 0.5
2.5 0.4

Different superscript letters in the same column indicate statistical significant difference between root canals in the same group of teeth
(independent sample t test, p \ 0.05); within root, values with bold letters in the same line were statistically different (paired-sample t test,
p \ 0.05)
M mesial; D distal; MB mesio-buccal; DB disto-buccal; P palatal

a discreet 2D object is defined as 4A/(p.(dmax)2), where

A is the area and dmax is the major diameter. The
value of roundness ranges from 0 to 1, with one signifying
a circle. The major diameter was defined as the distance
between the two most distant pixels in that object. The
minor diameter was defined as the longest chord through
the object that can be drawn in the direction orthogonal to
that of the major diameter.
Qualitative analysis
Three-dimensional models and cross sections of the root
canals were reconstructed based on micro-CT scans and
generated by the binarisation process using CTAn v.1.12
software (Bruker-microCT). CTVol v.2.2.1 (Bruker-microCT) and DataViewer v.1.4.4 (Bruker-microCT) software were used for visualisation and qualitative evaluation
of the specimens.
Statistical analysis
Three-dimensional parameter results and the average
length of roots and root canals were statistically compared
using paired-sample t test within group and independent
sample t test between groups, respectively. Considering
that the data of dentine thickness and two-dimensional
parameters at 1, 2 and 3 mm from the resorption bevel
were normally distributed (ShapiroWilk test; p [ 0.05),
they were presented as means and standard deviations
(SD), and statistically compared using one-way analysis of
variance post hoc Tukey test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) with a significance level set at 5 %.

Results
Quantitative analysis
Tables 1 and 2 show the mean (SD) of the three- and
two-dimensional data, respectively, in each root of the
primary molars. Overall, in both groups of teeth no statistical differences were found between root canals of the
first and second molars with respect to length, SMI, and the
two-dimensional analysed parameters (area, roundness,
major diameter, and minor diameter) (p [ 0.05). Distal and
palatal canals of the mandibular and maxillary molars,
respectively, presented a significant higher volume than the
other canals in the same group of teeth (p \ 0.05). Generally, root canals of the second primary molar canals had
higher surface area than the first molars (p \ 0.05).
Table 3 summarises the mean dentine thickness in the
apical third of each molar root. No statistical difference
was observed in the comparison of the dentine thickness, in
either internal or external aspect of each root, between the
first and second molars (p [ 0.05). The lowest mean values
of dentine thickness were observed in the internal aspect of
the roots, in both molar groups. In general, the highest
mean thickness of dentine was observed in the distal and
palatal roots of the mandibular and maxillary molars,
respectively, in all evaluated levels.
Qualitative analysis
The analysis of the external anatomy of the mandibular first
and second molars showed that all specimens had two
roots, wider in the buccallingual dimension, narrower
mesio-distally, and often fluted. Deep caries with no pulp

123

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

Table 2 Mean (SD) of
morphometric 2D data at 1, 2
and 3 mm from the apical
resorption bevel in each root of
primary mandibular and
maxillary molars

Root
canal

10

Distance
(mm)

Area
(mm2)

Roundness

Major diameter
(mm)

Minor diameter
(mm)

Mandibular
First molar

Second molar

10

10

10

0.4 0.6

0.4 0.2

1.0 1.0

0.4 0.3

0.4 0.6

0.4 0.2

1.1 0.9

0.4 0.2

0.5 0.6

0.4 0.2

1.3 0.9

0.4 0.3

0.5 0.4

0.3 0.1

1.2 0.6

0.4 0.2

0.6 0.4

0.3 0.1

1.5 0.4

0.5 0.2

0.7 0.4

0.4 0.1

1.4 0.6

0.6 0.3

0.4 0.6

0.4 0.2

1.3 1.6

0.3 0.2

0.2 0.4

0.4 0.2

1.0 1.0

0.3 0.1

0.5 0.9

0.3 0.2

1.4 1.1

0.4 0.2

1
2

0.4 0.5
0.7 0.7

0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2

1.8 1.4
2.1 1.5

0.3 0.1
0.4 0.2

1.2 1.0

0.2 0.2

2.7 1.4

0.5 0.2

Maxillary
First molar

MB

DB

Second molar

Asterisk (*) means statistically

significant difference within
root in the same group of teeth
(one-way ANOVA post hoc
Tukey test, p \ 0.05)

MB

DB

10

10

10

10

10

10

M mesial; D distal; MB mesiobuccal; DB disto-buccal;

P palatal

exposure were observed in 20 % of the sample. Early

apical root resorption was observed in only one specimen
from each group of teeth. On the other hand, surface
resorption at the internal aspect of the roots was observed
in most of the teeth (n = 15). Bevelled resorption in the
apex of both roots resulted in a thinner thickness of the
dentine walls compared to the middle and cervical thirds.
Three-dimensional models of the mandibular molars confirm that the configuration of the root canal system was
consistent with the external morphology of the root
(Fig. 1ac). A single root canal was observed in 10 % of
the mesial roots, while a single distal canal system was
detected in 60 and 50 % of the first and second molars,
respectively. In the mesial and distal roots, the maximum
number of orifices observed in the root canal cross sections
was 8 and 5, respectively. At the furcation level, the mesial

123

0.1 0.1

0.4 0.1

0.5 0.3

0.3 0.2

0.2 0.2

0.3 0.2

1.0 0.6

0.3 0.2

0.3 0.2

0.3 0.2

1.0 0.6

0.4 0.2

0.1 0.3

0.5 0.2

0.5 0.3

0.2 0.2

0.2 0.3

0.5 0.2

0.6 0.3

0.3 0.2

0.2 0.3

0.4 0.2

0.6 0.3

0.3 0.2

0.4 0.5

0.6 0.1

0.8 0.4

0.5 0.3

0.6 0.5

0.6 0.1

1.0 0.4

0.7 0.4

0.9 0.7

0.5 0.1

1.3 0.5

0.8 0.4

0.3 0.2

0.3 0.1

1.2 0.9

0.3 0.1

0.4 0.2

0.2 0.1

1.4 0.9

0.4 0.1

0.4 0.3

0.2 0.1

1.6 1.0

0.4 0.2

1
2

0.2 0.1
0.3 0.1

0.3 0.2
0.3 0.2

0.9 0.3
1.3 0.6

0.3 0.1
0.3 0.1

0.4 0.2

0.3 0.2

1.6 0.9

0.4 0.1

0.7 0.2

0.5 0.1

1.3 0.3

0.6 0.1*

0.9 0.4

0.5 0.1

1.5 0.4

0.7 0.1

1.1 0.4

0.5 0.1

1.7 0.5

0.8 0.1*

root of the mandibular first molars showed two orifices in

eight samples, whilst all other roots presented only one
orifice. Ribbon-shaped canal systems with one or two
canals in the mesial root and one in the distal root were
present in 40 and 30 % of the first and second molars,
respectively. In the latter, a ribbon-shaped canal that separates into two or more canals from below the cementoenamel junction was also observed.
Figure 2 shows exemplary 3D models of the external
(Fig. 2a) and internal anatomy (Fig. 2bc) of three primary
maxillary molars. Generally, three canal systems were
present, one in each root. Two canals were observed in the
mesio-buccal (MB) root of two maxillary first molars. At
the furcation level, the MB root of the maxillary first
molars showed two orifices in two samples, whilst all other
roots presented only one orifice. The analysis of the

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

Table 3 Mean (SD) of dentine thickness (in mm) at 1, 2 and 3 mm
from the apical resorption bevel in each root of primary mandibular
and maxillary molars
Root
canal

10

Distance
(mm)

Thickness
(internal)

Thickness
(external)

Mandibular
First molar

Second molar

Maxillary
First molar

MB

DB

Second molar

MB

DB

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

0.4 0.1

0.7 0.1

0.5 0.1

0.8 0.2

0.5 0.1

0.9 0.2

0.4 0.1

0.8 0.3

0.5 0.2

0.8 0.3

0.4 0.1

0.8 0.3

0.5 0.1

0.6 0.1*

0.6 0.1

0.7 0.1

0.6 0.1

0.8 0.1*

0.5 0.1

0.7 0.2

0.6 0.1

0.8 0.2

0.6 0.1

0.9 0.3

0.3 0.1

0.6 0.3

0.4 0.1

0.7 0.3

0.5 0.1

0.7 0.3

0.4 0.2

0.6 0.2*

0.6 0.2

0.7 0.2

0.6 0.3

0.9 0.2*

0.8 0.2

1.0 0.2

1.1 0.3

1.1 0.2

1.2 0.4

1.2 0.3

0.4 0.1*

0.6 0.1

0.5 0.1

0.8 0.2

0.6 0.1*

0.8 0.2

10

0.5 0.2

0.7 0.1

0.6 0.2

0.8 0.2

10

3
1

0.7 0.2
0.6 0.2

0.9 0.3
1.0 0.3

0.8 0.3

1.2 0.4

0.8 0.2

1.3 0.5

Asterisk (*) means statistically significant difference within root in

the same group of teeth (one-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey test,
p \ 0.05)
M mesial; D distal; MB mesio-buccal; DB disto-buccal; P palatal

external anatomy showed that six specimens from each

group of teeth had three widely separated roots, while four
presented fusion between the disto-buccal (DB) and palatal
roots. Deep caries with no pulp exposure were observed in
30 % of the sample. Early bevelled apical root resorption
was observed in two MB roots of the second molars, and
three MB and two DB roots of the first molars. The apical
resorption of the roots resulted in a thinner thickness of the
dentine walls compared to the middle and cervical thirds
and, in some cases, exposure of the root canal (Fig. 2d).

Surface resorption at the internal aspect of the roots was

observed in most of the specimens (n = 17).
Exemplary cross sections of the roots of the mandibular
and maxillary primary molars showed the complexity and
the large dimensions of the root canal system in the apical
third (Fig. 3). In the mandibular molars, mesial canal cross
sections were significantly flatter and irregularly tapered in
the mesio-distal plane. The presence of thin isthmuses,
interconnecting branches, and multiples orifices were
observed. Round-shaped canals were observed when the
main canal split into multiple canals throughout the root,
which occurred in 60 and 70 % of the first and second
molars, respectively. In the maxillary molars, evaluation of
the cross sections of the roots showed generally ribbon- or
oval-shaped canals with large dimensions. However, in
both mandibular and maxillary molars, the cross-sectional
appearance of the canals varied in different levels of the
root. Table 4 summarises the percentage frequency of root
canal shape in each root of the primary maxillary and
mandibular molars.

Discussion
Although detailed descriptions of the external and internal
anatomical configuration of primary molars have been
already reported using conventional methodologies (Hibbard and Ireland 1957; Simpson 1973; Badger 1982; Falk
and Bowers 1983; Ringelstein and Seow 1989; Salama
et al. 1992; Caceda et al. 1994; Winkler and Ahmad 1997;
Wrbas et al. 1997; Kavanagh and OSullivan 1998; Fuks
2000; Eden et al. 2002; Goodacre 2003; Zoremchhingi
et al. 2005; Aminabadi et al. 2008; Poornima and Subba
Reddy 2008; Song et al. 2009; Bagherian et al. 2010; Liu
et al. 2010; Cleghorn et al. 2012), no study has been
undertaken to evaluate quantitatively their root canal system using high-resolution micro-computed tomography.
Primary mandibular molars have been usually described
as having two grooved and divergent roots that flare to
accommodate the developing permanent premolars (Hibbard and Ireland 1957; Zoremchhingi et al. 2005; Bagherian et al. 2010). In the literature, a considerable variation
in number and shape of canal systems has been described
in this group of teeth (Hibbard and Ireland 1957; Salama
et al. 1992; Zoremchhingi et al. 2005; Aminabadi et al.
2008; Bagherian et al. 2010; Cleghorn et al. 2012). Anatomical anomalies, such as additional roots, dens invaginatus, and taurodontism, have also been reported, mostly in
mandibular second molars (Badger 1982; Falk and Bowers
1983; Winkler and Ahmad 1997; Eden et al. 2002; Zoremchhingi et al. 2005; Johnston and Franklin 2006; Song
et al. 2009; Bagherian et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2010). Overall,
it may be inferred that the external and internal anatomy of

123

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

Fig. 1 Exemplary threedimensional models of three
primary mandibular molars
(a) showing the anatomical
configuration of the root canals
in frontal (b) and lateral
(c) views. Generally, ribbonshaped canal systems are
present, with one or two found
in the mesial root and one in the
distal root. A ribbon-shaped
canal that separates into two
canals from below the cementoenamel junction was also
observed in the distal root in
both molars

the primary mandibular first molar closely resembles the

primary mandibular second molar (Goodacre 2003; Cleghorn et al. 2012). Most studies have found either one or two

123

canals in each of the mesial and distal roots (Hibbard and

Ireland 1957; Zoremchhingi et al. 2005; Aminabadi et al.
2008; Bagherian et al. 2010). The incidence of double

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

Fig. 2 Exemplary three-dimensional models of three primary

maxillary molars (a) showing the anatomical configuration of the
root canals in frontal (bc) and apical (d) views. Generally, ribbon- or
oval-shaped canal systems were present, with one or two canals in the

mesio-buccal root and one in the disto-buccal and palatal roots. The
presence of a bevelled resorption in the apex of the roots resulted in a
thinner thickness of the dentine walls and exposure of the root canal
(arrows in d)

ribbon-shaped canal system has been reported to range

from 24 to 100 % in the mesial root, and from 22.2 to 60 %
in the distal root (Zoremchhingi et al. 2005; Aminabadi
et al. 2008; Bagherian et al. 2010); however, two canals in
the mesial root and one canal in the distal root comprised
the most commonly reported anatomical configuration in
primary mandibular molars (Cleghorn et al. 2012). In the
present study, this configuration was observed in 50 and
40 % of the first and second mandibular molars, respectively. The lowest length of the distal roots was not
reflected in the volume and surface area of the canal, which
showed higher values than the mesial canal. An

explanation can be found in the analysis of the 2D

parameters, which showed the highest mean values of area,
major and minor diameters in the distal canals of both
molar types. Goodacre (2003) calculated the mean
dimensions of primary teeth based on several studies and
found that the mean lengths of the mesial and distal roots of
the first and second molars were 10.5 and 8.9 mm, and 11.4
and 10.5 mm, which were higher than the present results.
Primary maxillary molars have been described as having
three divergent and separated roots that flare to accommodate the developing permanent premolars (Hibbard and
Ireland 1957; Goodacre 2003; Zoremchhingi et al. 2005;

123

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

Fig. 3 Exemplary cross
sections of the M mesial,
D distal, MB mesio-buccal, DB
disto-buccal, and P palatal roots
of the mandibular (a) and
maxillary (b) primary molars,
showing the complexity and the
large dimensions of the root
canal system in the apical third

Table 4 Percentage frequency of root canal shape in each root of the primary maxillary and mandibular molars
n

Root canal

Round

First molar

10

30

D
Second molar

10

Oval

Flat-oval

Ribbon

Irregular

10

50

10

30

10

10

40

10

30

60

10

40

20

40

MB
DB

10

10
50

20
50

50

10

20

80

MB

20

10

20

40

10

DB

40

60

30

70

Mandibular

Maxillary
First molar

10

Second molar

10

M mesial; D distal; MB mesio-buccal; DB disto-buccal; P palatal

Bagherian et al. 2010). Overall, it may be inferred that the

external and internal anatomy of the primary maxillary first
molar roots closely resembles the primary maxillary second molar roots (Hibbard and Ireland 1957; Goodacre
2003; Cleghorn et al. 2012). Despite the fact that anatomical anomalies have been also reported in this group of
teeth, such as additional roots and taurodontism (Caceda
et al. 1994; Kavanagh and OSullivan 1998; Johnston and
Franklin 2006), they were not observed in this sample. The
incidence of fusion between palatal and DB roots was
observed in 40 % of the teeth, while in the literature it was

123

reported as being 77.7 % (Bagherian et al. 2010), 53.5 %

(Zoremchhingi et al. 2005), and 29 % (Hibbard and Ireland
1957) of the sample. Some variations in the number and
shape of canal systems have also been described in the
primary maxillary molars (Hibbard and Ireland 1957;
Goodacre 2003; Zoremchhingi et al. 2005; Bagherian et al.
2010; Cleghorn et al. 2012). Most studies have found only
one root canal in each root of both molar types (Hibbard
and Ireland 1957; Zoremchhingi et al. 2005; Aminabadi
et al. 2008; Bagherian et al. 2010). However, the incidence
of a double canal system in the MB root was reported in

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

6.7 % (Zoremchhingi et al. 2005), 7.4 % (Bagherian et al.

2010), and 35 % (Hibbard and Ireland 1957) of the sample
and, in the DB root, in 3.7 % of the specimens (Bagherian
et al. 2010). In the present study, a double canal system
was observed only in the MB root of two maxillary first
molars. A previous study has found that the mean lengths
of the MB, DB and palatal roots of the primary maxillary
first molar were 8.8, 8.2 and 7.8 mm, respectively, and in
the maxillary second molars 10.8, 9.7 and 10.8 mm,
respectively (Goodacre 2003), which were higher than the
present results. The lowest dimension of the palatal root in
the maxillary first molar (5.96 mm) reflected the volume
and surface area of the canal, which were significantly
lower than the palatal canal of the second molar. The
surface area of the DB canal in the second molar showed
significantly higher values than in the first molar, despite
the similar mean length between them. An explanation can
be found in the analysis of the 2D parameters, which
showed higher values of area, major and minor diameters
in the DB canal of the second molar.
The SMI describes the plate- or cylinder-like geometry
of an object. If a perfect plate is enlarged, the surface area
does not change, yielding an SMI of zero. However, if a
rod is expanded, the surface area increases with the volume
and the SMI is normed, so that perfect rods are assigned an
SMI score of 3 (Peters et al. 2000). In the mandibular
molars, the mean SMI values varied from 1.69 to 2.06
indicating that the root canal system of the mesial and
distal canals, in both molars, had flat cone-shaped geometry. In the maxillary molars, the mean SMI values of the
canals in most of the specimens were higher than 2.08
indicating a conical shape geometry. The cross-sectional
appearance of the root canal in the apical third was evaluated using the so-called morphometric parameter of
roundness. In mandibular molars, mean roundness ranged
from 0.31 to 0.49, which means that the root canal was
more flat shaped. In the maxillary molars, the lowest range
of values observed in the MB root of the second molar
(0.260.33) indicated a ribbon-shaped canal and reflected
its SMI data (1.81 0.61). On the other hand, DB and P
root canals, as well as MB canal of the first molar, were
more oval shaped considering that the roundness ranged
from 0.38 to 0.63.
The wide range of variations reported in the literature
regarding the anatomy of the root canal system of primary
molars, in comparison to the present results, has been
mostly related to the diversity in sample origin, racial
factors, the relatively small number of teeth in each group,
the presence of initial apical root resorption in some
specimens and, of course, to the methodological approach
(Cleghorn et al. 2012). On the other hand, the micro-CT
experimental model presented here overcomes several
limitations displayed by the aforementioned conventional

methods, as it provides useful 2D and 3D information

related to the root canal space without changing the original sample. Unfortunately, these morphometric analyses
cannot be compared to others because of the lack of similar
reports in the literature to date.
Effective root canal debridement relies on accurate
determination of the working length and adequate apical
canal enlargement, which allow for better irrigation in the
apical area, optimising root canal disinfection (Fornari
et al. 2010). In the present study, major and minor diameters of the root canals in the apical third indicated that the
debridement at this level could be improved with instruments up to an ISO size 100. However, considering the
shape of the root canals, the reduced thickness of the
dentine walls, and the difficulty in predicting the location
of the canal terminus accurately in primary teeth (Beltrame
et al. 2011), using instruments of this size would definitely
lead to stripping or perforations of the roots. Clinically, 2D
data results have definite implications for shaping and
cleaning procedures, because only the minor diameter is
evident on radiographs. Thus, clinicians must be aware of
the anatomical configuration of the canals which, combined
with the presence of thin isthmuses in the apical region,
would compromise adequate cleaning and shaping, leaving
untouched fins on the buccal and/or lingual aspects of the
canal.
The introduction of nickeltitanium rotary file systems
has resulted in a marked progress in the mechanical preparation of the root canal space (Hulsmann et al. 2005).
However, shaping root canals with these systems has failed
in debriding flat- and oval-shaped canals, leaving untouched fins or recesses on the buccal and/or lingual extensions (Versiani et al. 2011, 2013). Besides, large tapered
rotary files should be avoided in primary mandibular
molars considering their internal anatomical configuration.
Recently, Self-Adjusting File (SAF; ReDent-Nova, Raanana, Israel) cleaningshapingirrigation system was
introduced. This innovative instrument consists of a hollow
and lightly abrasive nickeltitanium file composed of a
metal lattice, which adapts itself to round, oval, or even
long-oval cross sections of root canals. During its operation, which lasts 4 min, SAF removes dentine with a backand-forth grinding motion by scrubbing the canal walls
with a continuous irrigation provided by a peristaltic pump,
i.e. it simultaneously performs the mechanical and chemical preparation of the root canal space (Metzger et al.
2010). Previous reports have shown that the SAF system
was advantageous in promoting cleaning, shaping, and
disinfection of oval-shaped canals in permanent teeth
compared to rotary files (Siqueira et al. 2010; Versiani
et al. 2011, 2013; Ribeiro et al. 2013), and may be an
alternative for shaping procedures in primary molar teeth to
be evaluated in further studies.

123

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

Conclusion
Under the limitations of this ex vivo study, it was possible
to conclude that external and internal anatomy of the primary first molars closely resembles the primary second
molars. Considering the morphology of the canals in the
apical third, a careful selection of instruments including the
use of additional disinfection supplements such as passive
ultrasonic irrigation or negative apical pressure is advisable. The reported data may help clinicians to obtain a
thorough understanding of the variations in root canal
morphology of primary molars to overcome problems
related to shaping and cleaning procedures.
Conflict of interest
of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict

References
Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Gajan EB. Study of root canal
accessibility in human primary molars. J Oral Sci. 2008;50:
6974.
Badger GR. Three-rooted mandibular first primary molar. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;53:547.
Bagherian A, Kalhori KA, Sadeghi M, Mirhosseini F, Parisay I. An
in vitro study of root and canal morphology of human deciduous
molars in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci. 2010;52:397403.
Beltrame AP, Triches TC, Sartori N, Bolan M. Electronic determination of root canal working length in primary molar teeth: an
in vivo and ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2011;44:4026.
Caceda JH, Creath CJ, Thomas JP, Thornton JB. Unilateral fusion of
primary molars with the presence of a succedaneous supernumerary tooth: case report. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16:535.
Cleghorn BM, Boorberg NB, Christie WH. Primary human teeth and
their root canal systems. Endod Topics. 2012;23:633.
Eden EK, Koca H, Sen BH. Dens invaginatus in a primary molar:
report of case. ASDC J Dent Child. 2002;69:4953.
Falk WV, Bowers DF. Bilateral three-rooted mandibular first primary
molars: report of case. ASDC J Dent Child. 1983;50:1367.
Fornari VJ, Silva-Sousa YT, Vanni JR, et al. Histological evaluation
of the effectiveness of increased apical enlargement for cleaning
the apical third of curved canals. Int Endod J. 2010;43:98894.
Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent
dentitions. Dent Clin N Am. 2000;44:57196.
Goodacre CJ. Atlas of the human dentition. 2nd ed. Loma Linda:
Loma Linda School of Dentistry; 2003.
Hibbard ED, Ireland RL. Morphology of the root canals of the
primary molar teeth. J Dent Child. 1957;24:2507.
Hulsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of
root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics.
2005;10:3076.
Johnston NJ, Franklin DL. Dental findings of a child with WolfHirschhorn syndrome. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16:13942.

123

Kavanagh C, OSullivan VR. A four-rooted primary upper second

molar. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1998;8:27982.
Liu JF, Dai PW, Chen SY, et al. Prevalence of 3-rooted primary
mandibular second molars among Chinese patients. Pediatr Dent.
2010;32:1236.
Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The self-adjusting
file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy - a new
concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod.
2010;36:67990.
Peters OA, Laib A, Ruegsegger P, Barbakow F. Three-dimensional
analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution computed
tomography. J Dent Res. 2000;79:14059.
Poornima P. Subba Reddy VV. Comparison of digital radiography,
decalcification, and histologic sectioning in the detection of
accessory canals in furcation areas of human primary molars.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008;26:4952.
Pratt WK. Digital image processing. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1991.
Ribeiro MVM, Silva-Sousa YT, Versiani MA, et al. Comparison of
the cleaning efficacy of self-adjusting file and rotary systems in
the apical third of oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2013;39:
398410.
Ringelstein D, Seow WK. The prevalence of furcation foramina in
primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 1989;11:198202.
Salama FS, Anderson RW, McKnight-Hanes C, Barenie JT, Myers
DR. Anatomy of primary incisor and molar root canals. Pediatr
Dent. 1992;14:1178.
Simpson WJ. An examination of root canal anatomy of primary teeth.
J Can Dent Assoc. 1973;39:63740.
Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Almeida BM, de Oliveira JC, Rocas IN.
Ability of chemomechanical preparation with either rotary
instruments or self-adjusting file to disinfect oval-shaped root
canals. J Endod. 2010;36:18605.
Song JS, Kim SO, Choi BJ, et al. Incidence and relationship of an
additional root in the mandibular first permanent molar and
primary molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod. 2009;107:e5660.
Versiani MA, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Flat-oval root canal
preparation with self-adjusting file instrument: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2011;37:10027.
Versiani MA, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Root and root canal
morphology of four-rooted maxillary second molars: a microcomputed tomography study. J Endod. 2012;38:97782.
Versiani MA, Steier L, De-Deus G, et al. Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the Selfadjusting File, Reciproc, WaveOne, and Protaper Universal
systems. J Endod. 2013;39:10606.
Winkler MP, Ahmad R. Multirooted anomalies in the primary
dentition of Native Americans. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:
100911.
Wrbas KT, Kielbassa AM, Hellwig E. Microscopic studies of
accessory canals in primary molar furcations. ASDC J Dent
Child. 1997;64:11822.
Zoremchhingi, Joseph T, Varma B, Mungara J. A study of root canal
morphology of human primary molars using computerized
tomography: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent.
2005;23:712.