Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Conventional polymeric fuels for hybrid rocket propulsion have relatively low regression
rates. Two possible solutions were examined: utilization of energetic nano-sized particles,
and adoption of non-polymeric paraffin fuel. Addition of 13 wt.% of nano-sized tungsten
powder to HTPB-based fuel resulted in an increase of 38% in fuel regression rate compared
to the pure HTPB fuel. The use of nano-sized tungsten powders in solid fuels for volume
limited propulsion systems is greatly beneficial due to its high density, high heat of oxidation,
and low oxidation temperature. SEM/EDS micrographs of the newly processed energetic
paraffin-based solid fuels have shown that the nano-sized Silberline aluminum flakes are
homogenously mixed in the fuel matrix. Paraffin-based solid fuels containing aluminum
flakes showed a significant increase in regression rate over the non-aluminized paraffin fuel.
A real-time X-ray radiography system enables the measurement of the instantaneous radius
of the solid fuel grain. The radial increment of the regressing fuel surface can be correlated
with time in a power-law form. An implicit relationship showing the dependency of
instantaneous fuel regression rate on the total mass flux was obtained. The functional
relationships for aluminized HTPB and paraffin fuels were obtained in graphical forms.
Results show that the conventional power-law relationship between the average regression
rate and average oxidizer mass flux cannot be applied to the instantaneous regression rates
of solid fuel burning in hybrid rocket motor conditions.
I.
Introduction
Hybrid rocket motors (employing a solid fuel and a gaseous, liquid, or gel oxidizer) posses many advantages
over conventional solid-propellant rocket motors including on/off capability, thrust tailoring operability, minimal
environmental impact, and also an inherent safety.1,2,3 With the ever growing concern of safety and reliability in the
space-propulsion industry, the hybrid rocket can fill a void due to the inherent safety stemming from the physical
separation of the fuel and oxidizer and the ability to control the combustion event by regulating the oxidizer flow
rate as a function of time. In hybrid rocket combustors, the regression rate of solid polymeric fuels is dictated by the
total mass flux in the port region. This mass flux is the local sum of the burned products and the unconsumed
oxidizer in the flow stream. Since the oxidizer and fuel-pyrolysis products are not initially premixed in the hybrid
rocket engine, the rate of the combustion is diffusion-limited. In other words, the combustion processes of the
reactants in hybrid rockets are dominated by the mixing and reaction rates of the pyrolyzed fuel species with the
turbulent oxidizer stream flowing through either the center port or multiple ports of the solid-fuel grain.4,56,7 For the
case of paraffin fuels (e.g., C32H66), the combustion process is still diffusion limited; however, the fuel droplets are
shed from the surface waves of the molten fuel layer generated during the combustion process. The mixing of the
fuel components and the oxidizer involves the evaporation of fuel droplets and oxidizer gas in the two-phase flow
field. In addition, the mixing of the oxidizer species with those generated from surface pyrolysis/evaporation of the
molten fuel also controls the combustion rate.
Due to the relatively low mass-burning rate of polymer-based solid fuels, such as hydroxyl-terminated
polybutadiene (HTPB) and hydroxyl-terminated polyether (HTPE) compared to solid propellants, a large fuel
burning surface area is required to attain a given thrust level. The utilization of various energetic nano-sized powder
additives in the fuel formulation is one way to alleviate this problem by increasing the fuel regression rate. Previous
studies conducted by Risha, et al.8,9,10,11 have evaluated 19 different HTPB-based fuel formulations using a LongGrain Center-Perforated (LGCP) hybrid rocket motor. In addition to the 19 fuel formulations previously tested,
nano-sized tungsten powders and nano-sized rod shaped aluminum have been acquired and tested as performance
enhancing additives in HTPB-based solid fuels.
Another means of increasing the mass-burning rate of solid fuels is by the use of paraffin wax-based solid fuels,
which have shown to increase regression rates to 3 times that of traditional polymeric fuels such as HTPB.12 The
combination of paraffin-based solid fuels and nano-sized energetic particles drastically increases the regression rates
of solid fuel formulations. The large increase in fuel regression rate that is attained helps to alleviate the need for
complex port geometries required with current polymer-based fuel formulations.
A. Objective of Research
Existing solid propellant missiles have relatively low specific impulses, but high density impulses. In addition,
the burning rates of the current solid propellant grains in the existing systems are limited due to the less efficient
burning-rate modifiers that have been utilized in the conventional solid propellants. Several other undesirable
features of the solid-propellant rocket systems are: 1) not being capable of thrust modulation; 2) the propellant grain
cannot be extinguished once the grain is ignited; 3) their susceptibility to mechanical damage and subsequent flame
spreading into the damaged regions and potential catastrophic motor failure; and 4) solid fuel mechanical properties
are sacrificed because of relatively low loading densities. As mentioned, the major disadvantage of the existing
solid-fuel grain formulations is the relatively low mass-burning rate of the fuel, requiring a relatively large fuel
surface area for a desired thrust level. Low burning rates of solid fuels have been shown to be enhanced by the
addition of energetic metal powders. In addition the use of non-polymeric fuels such as paraffin wax increase the
burning rate of solid fuels by many hundred percent.
The objective of this research is to find means of further enhancement of the mass-burning rate of solid fuel
formulations for use in hybrid rocket motor propulsion systems. To accomplish this goal there have been two main
methods of fuel burning rate enhancement:
1)
Nano-sized particle addition for increasing the heat that is released near the surface of the fuel. This
will increase the linear regression rate of the fuel and thus the mass flow-rate of propellant.
2)
Paraffin-based solid fuel formulations have an inherently high mass-burning rate due to the
hydrodynamically unstable liquid layer that is formed on the surface of the fuel during combustion.13,14
Evaluation of various fuel formulations with either and/or both of these mass-burning rate enhancement
techniques has led to the development of novel solid fuel formulations with greatly enhance mass-burning rates.
With the X-ray Translucent Casing (XTC) hybrid rocket motor the surface of the fuel is imaged throughout the
duration of the combustion test. This allows for the instantaneous regression rate to be determined as a function of
time. The regression rate can than be correlated to the instantaneous oxidizer mass flux.
II.
Method of Approach
2
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
3
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
4
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
considered in both the LGCP and XTC hybrid rocket motors. A wide range of average oxidizer mass fluxes (60-290
kg/m2-s) have been evaluated for comparison to results obtained in the LGCP hybrid rocket motor for particle
addition to HTPB-based solid fuels and to
further extend the range of data.
340
The addition of Silberline aluminum
particles has shown to increase the linear
regression rate of HTPB-based solid fuel
320
formulations by approximately 30% over
the baseline pure HTPB fuel. Burning rate
enhancement is also expected for paraffin300
based solid fuel formulations containing
different amounts of aluminum particles.
280
Besides the increase in the regression rate
of the solid fuel, the density impulse of the
PF w/ 20% SILBAL
metallized fuel is also higher than the
PF w/ 17% SILBAL
260
PF w/ 13% SILBAL
baseline case. Figure 4 shows a comparison
PF w/ 10% SILBAL
of density impulses for varying percentages
PF w/ 7% SILBAL
of Silberline aluminum nano-sized flakes.
PF
w/
4%
SILBAL
240
Pure Paraffin Fuel
All data presented is for liquid oxygen as
the oxidizer and a chamber pressure of
1000 psia. As can be seen the addition of
220
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
aluminum to paraffin based fuels can
O/F
indeed be highly beneficial in volume
limited systems as the density impulse
Figure 4. Thermochemical calculations of density Isp of varying increases very significantly (8%) with a
percentages of Silberline aluminum nano-particles added to 20% aluminum addition by weight.
Figure 5 shows a comparison of density
paraffin
Isp of pure Paraffin to various weight
percentages of nano-sized tungsten particles.
The number of particles in a 13% by weight
340
tungsten addition is much lower than that of
a 13% by weight aluminum addition due to
the significantly higher molecular weight of
320
tungsten. The large increase in density Isp
that is observed, even over comparable
300
weight
percentages
of
Silberline
aluminum, is also very advantageous in
volume-limited systems.
280
PF w/ 20% W addition
PF w/ 13% W addition
PF w/ 17% W addition
PF w/ 10% W addition
PF w/ 7% W addition
PF w/ 4% W addition
Pure Paraffin Fuel
III.
Discussion of Results
5
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
6
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
motor combuster. Based upon this, complete combustion is anticipated even at much higher particle loadings
because of the means of ignition and heterogeneous combustion.
Silberline aluminum flakes, and Stanford paraffin burnseen for the formulations containing 13% by wt.
rate curve fit
Silberline particles. An increase of about 60%
12
7
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
O2 flow
40 mm
Figure 8. Grain surface of a recovered paraffin-based solid fuel with 13% Silberline aluminum
showing wrinkled pattern (Test No. XTC-PF-10-SILBAL-13)
is seen for the difference between the aluminized paraffin and the Stanford curve fit results. Another observation
that can be made regarding the burning trends of the paraffin-based fuel formulations is the difference in slope of the
curve fits. This difference in slope is caused by the aluminum particles in the paraffin fuel combustion process. In
baseline paraffin fuel formulations, one of the governing parameters is the oxidizer flow velocity. This dictates the
size of the wave structure that occurs on the fuel surface (see Fig. 8) and also the size of the particles that are
stripped from the surface waves of the molten fuel layer and entrained into the combustion zone.
G. Instantaneous Regression Rate Determination
Analysis of the visual data obtained from four XTC test firings with HTPB-based and paraffin-based solid fuel
formulations containing 13% by wt. Silberline aluminum were analyzed in order to get a correlation of the
instantaneous fuel port radius near the aft end of the grain as a function of time. This was accomplished by
processing the video images from the real-time X-ray radiography system using a commercially available special
effects package that did not alter the actual fuel surface location. The special effect inverts the image density of the
original picture; this inversion greatly enhances the clarity of the fuel grain surface. Images are analyzed at ~0.25
second increments, which was chosen to be small enough to give sufficient resolution for the curve fit and large
enough to show the radial variation of the fuel surface. This time step is altered if an image is difficult to measure a
distinct fuel grain surface location. The deduced instantaneous radius is fit as a power law of time according to:
r (t ) r0 = a (t tign ) n
(1)
10
8
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
10
rb =
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
n 1
dr
n 1
= an ( t tign ) = an ( t *)
dt
(2)
Gtotal =
m& total
n
ro + a ( t *)
(3)
where the total mass flow rate is the sum of the instantaneous oxidizer mass flow rate and the fuel flow rate from
surface pyrolysis, namely
n 1
ro + a ( t *)n
(4)
Gtotal (t*) =
m& ox + 2 L p an ( t *)
ro + a ( t *)n
n 2
ro + a ( t *)
n 1
(5)
r (t*) n 1
t* = b
an
(6)
Eliminating t * from Eq. (5), we obtain the following relationship between rb (t*) and Gtotal (t*)
Gtotal (t*) =
m& ox
rb (t*)
an
ro + a
n
n 1
2 L p rb (t*)
n
rb (t*) n 1
+
r
a
o
an
(7)
This equation is in an implicit form of regression rate dependency on the total mass flux, oxidizer mass flux, initial
port radius, the axial distance and the power-law parameters. In order to express regression rate in terms of the total
mass flux, one has to make certain order-of-magnitude approximations of exponent n. Even though this expression
is much more complex than the conventional expression of regression rate in terms of power-law of oxidizer mass
flux, it is derived without major assumptions.
9
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Using Eq. (7), the deduced instantaneous regression rates of the two aluminized HTPB-based fuel test runs
(XTC-05 and XTC-07) are plotted versus the instantaneous total mass flux in Fig. 11. Even though the slopes (a) of
the fuel radius change versus time are nearly identical (see Table 2 and Fig. 9), the functional relationships between
regression rate and total mass flux are quite different as indicated by the difference of curvature and location of these
two sets of data in Fig. 11. We have looked into the possibility for using instantaneous oxidizer mass flux to replace
the total mass flux; however, the results shown in Fig. 12 also indicated the non-collapsing situation of the two
curves. Furthermore, the data do not follow the conventional power-law relationship between the measured
regression rate and the instantaneous oxidizer mass flux when the data are given in a log-log plot.
2
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
XTC-05
XTC-07
1.5
1.25
1.2
100
200
300
400
500
600
100
150
200
250
300
400
1.75
IV.
XTC-21
XTC-22
Conclusions
(1) Nano-sized tungsten powder addition to HTPBbased fuel formulation in 13% by wt. shows an
increase of 38% in fuel regression rate compared to
3
the baseline HTPB fuel formulation. Volume limited
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Total Mass Flux [kg/m2-s]
propulsion systems would greatly benefit from the use
Figure 13. Dependency of the instantaneous of nano-sized tungsten powders in solid fuel
regression rate of aluminized paraffin fuels on formulations due to its high density, high heat of
instantaneous total mass flux
oxidation, and low oxidation temperature via
heterogeneous reactions. The benefit derived in high
density impulses and combustion efficiency makes this energetic powder a viable additive to advanced energetic
fuels.
(2) SEM/EDS micrographs of the newly processed energetic paraffin-based solid fuels have shown that the nanosized Silberline aluminum flakes are homogenously mixed in the fuel matrix. It was verified that the recently
developed mixing and casting procedures do not cause particle migration in the fuel matrix, producing grains that
have fairly uniform distribution of aluminum particles throughout the fuel.
4
10
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
(3) Paraffin-based solid fuels containing Silberline aluminum flakes showed an increase in linear regression rates
of about 30% over the baseline paraffin fuel formulation. An increase of about 60% is seen for the difference
between the aluminized paraffin and the Stanford curve fit results.
(4) The real-time X-ray radiography system enables the measurement of the instantaneous radius of the solid fuel
grain with a cylindrical center port. The radial increment of the regressing fuel surface can be correlated with time in
a power-law form. The exponent for time was found to be higher as the oxidizer mass flow rate is increased.
(5) An implicit relationship showing the dependency of instantaneous fuel regression rate on the total mass flux was
obtained. The functional relationships for aluminized HTPB and paraffin fuels were obtained in graphical forms.
Results show that the position and the curvature of these curves depend strongly upon the oxidizer mass flow rate
and initial port radius of the fuel grain. This shows that the conventional power-law relationship between the
average regression rate and average oxidizer mass flux cannot be applied to the instantaneous regression rates of
solid fuel burning in hybrid motor conditions.
V.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Richard E. Bowen of NAVSEA and Mr. Carl Gotzmer and Mrs.
Nancy Johnson of the Naval Surface Warfare Center-Indian Head Division for their sponsorship of this research
project through CPBT corporation (under contract number N00174-02-C-0024) with a subcontract to PSU.
VI.
References
Kuo, K. K., Importance and Challenges of Hybrid Rocket Propulsion Beyond Year 2000, Invited von Krmn
Lecture in the Proceedings of the 37th Israel Annual Conference on Aerospace Sciences, pp. II-1 to II-31, February
26-28, 1997.
2
Chiaverini, M. J., Serin, N., Johnson, D., Lu, Y. C., Kuo, K. K., and Risha, G. A., "Regression Rate Behavior of
Hybrid Rocket Solid Fuels," Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol 16, No. 1, pp. 125-132, 2000.
3
Risha, G. A., Harting, G. C., Kuo, K. K., Peretz, A., and Koch, D. E., "Pyrolysis and Combustion of Solid Fuels in
Various Oxidizing Environments," AIAA Paper No. 98-3184, 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion
Conference, Cleveland, OH, July 13-15, 1998.
4
Strand, L. D., Ray, R. L., and Cohen, N. S., Hybrid Rocket Combustion Study, AIAA Paper 93-2412, June 1993.
5
Strand, L. D., Ray, R. L., Anderson, F. A., and Cohen, N. S., Hybrid Rocket Fuel Combustion and Regression
Rate Study, AIAA Paper 92-3302, June 1992.
6
Teague, W., Wright, A., Balkanli, D., and Hybl, L, Effect of Energetic Fuel Additives on the Temperature of
Hybrid Rocket Combustion, AIAA 99-2138, AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 35th Joint Propulsion Conference and
Exhibit, Los Angeles, CA, 20-23 June 1999.
7
Risha, G. A., Harting, G. C., Kuo, K. K., Peretz, A., Koch, D. E., Jones, H. S., and Arves, J. P., Surface Heat
Release of HTPB-Based Fuels in Oxygen Rich Environments, Combustion of Energetic Materials, Eds. K. K. Kuo,
L. T. DeLuca, Begell House, Inc., pp. 101-115, 2002.
8
Risha, G. A., Evans, B., Boyer, E., Wehrman, R. B., and Kuo, K. K., Nano-Sized Aluminum- and Boron- Based
Solid-Fuel Characterization in a Hybrid Rocket Engine, AIAA 2003-4593, AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 39th Joint
Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 20 23 Huntsville, AL, July 2003
9
Risha, G. A. Enhancement of Hybrid Rocket Combustion Performance Using Nano-Sized Energetic Particles,
Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, August 2003
10
Evans, B., Risha, G. A., Favorito, N., Boyer, E., Wehrman, R. B., Libis, N., Kuo, K. K., Instantaneous
Regression Rate Determination of a Cylindrical X-Ray Transparent Hybrid Rocket Motor, AIAA Paper No. 034592, AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 39th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 20 23 Huntsville, AL, July 2003.
11
Risha, G.A., Boyer, E. B., Wehrman, R. B., and Kuo, K. K., Performance Comparison of HTPB-Based Solid
Fuels Containing Nano-Sized Energetic Powder in a Cylindrical Hybrid Rocket Motor, AIAA 2002-3576,
AIAA/SAE/ASME 28th Joint Propulsion Conference, Indianapolis, IN, July 7-10, 2002.
12
Karabeyoglu, M. A., Zilliac, G., Cantwell, B. J., DeZilwa, S., and Castellucci, P., Scale-Up Tests of High
Regression Rate Liquefying Hybrid Rocket Fuels, AIAA Paper No. 03-1162, 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences
Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 6-9, 2003.
13
Karabeyoglu, M. A., Altman, D., and Cantwell, B. J., Combustion of Liquefying Hybrid Propellants: Part 1,
General Theory, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol 18, No. 3, pp. 610-620, 2002.
14
Karabeyoglu, M. A., and Cantwell, B. J., Combustion of Liquefying Hybrid Propellants: Part 2, Stability of
Liquid Films, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol 18, No. 3, pp. 621-630, 2002.
11
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
15
Risha, G. A, Ulas, A., Boyer, E. B., Kumar, S., and Kuo, K. K., Combustion of HTPB-Based Solid Fuels
Containing Nano-sized Energetic Powder in a Hybrid Rocket Motor, AIAA 01-3535, AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE
37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Salt Lake City, UT, 8 11 July 2001.
16
Weast, R. C.(ed), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 67th Edition, p. B-40, 1987.
12
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics