Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
us>
To: "Black, Edward K (DOJ)" <edward.black@state.de.us>
Subject: FW: Response to Rep. Williams re Priority Schools
Date: October 27, 2014 at 5:01:00 PM EDT
Allison: Just got off the phone with DOE. They are OK
with this as written. They had two minor edit
suggestions and I made both. I also made your
salutation suggestion. Does it look OK to send? Thanks,
Patty
Representative Williams: Thank you for your e-mail
dated September 23, 2014. In preparing this response
to your questions, I reviewed documents published by
the U.S. Department of Education including ESEA
Flexibility updated June 7, 2012, the ESEA Flexibility
Frequently Asked Questions revised August 3, 2012,
and the Addendum to those FAQs dated March 5, 2013. I
also reviewed documents available on DDOEs ESEA
Flexibility web page, including the Delaware Department
of Educations Flexibility, Amendment, and Extension
Requests.
As you point out, the Delaware Department of Education
(DDOE) enacted, through its accountability regulation
(14 Del. Admin. C. 103), a program to assist low
performing schools. That regulation includes a definition
for a persistently low-achieving schools and, further,
includes provisions for such things as deeming a school
or school district under improvement, setting forth the
accountability phases 1 and 2 for a school or school
district so deemed; includes possible identification
categories of Corrective Action Phase 1, Corrective
Action Phase 2, Restructuring, and Partnership Zone
School. Schools within these categories were,
dependent on the particular category, involved in such
things as developing and implementing a School
Success Plan; developing and implementing a
Corrective Action Plan; developing and implementing
a Restructuring Plan; or operating under a