Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
force which reduces the mourning for the death of the child. The mourning and tragic grief is
replaced by the tree, which represent life, beauty and growth like the orchard. There is a sense of
hope as well as sadness which rises within the poem from the first stanza.
Birth, "A promise of new fruit in other autumns", also provides a sense of hope in life. Therefore
within the poem an allusion to another culture and tradition is made. This comparison shows how
a tradition which creates hope for a joyful event has been used to change grief into hope and a
celebration of life, not to those who are new to life but for those who will be remembered for
their life and have died. The difference between the boy who has died and the newborn baby is
symbolized through the use of different trees. The dead boy is represented as a giant native
sequoia. This tree represents age, experience, strength, development and beauty, all the aspects
which a "green sapling" or "apple boughs" still need to develop just like newborn babies.
While the "native giant" sequoia stands tall and strong, the rest of the family is going to be
scattered in the air when they die. The tree will forever be
a representation of the dead son. This death was the reason the tree was born. However the last
line of the poem, "Silently keeping the secret of your birth", indicates that the reason for the tree
and the actual planting of the sequoia was the intimate and private moment for the father in order
to be at peace with the death of his son. Therefore it was a secret and shall remain a secret. The
quiet alliteration of the sound "s" provides a sense of calmness which closes the poem with a
tone and mood of serenity and rest. The secret of the birth of the tree will always remain between
the father and the tree. Therefore the relationship between father and son will remain forever.
Not only does the poem show a relationship between nature and man but also between father and
son. This is evident through the structure of the poem. The lack of rhythm and rhyme presents
the poem as a private monologue from a father to his son. The reader is invited to listen and
experience the unification of a man and nature as well as the everlasting tie between father and
son.
The father created a way to have the memory of his son live on forever. By planting a tree man
and nature worked together to create life. Through the use of natural and unnatural imagery,
personification, diction and symbolism man and nature were unified within this poem. Either
through having a symbolic tree, being buried or scattered everyone unifies with nature after
death. This is the natural cycle of life.
Examiners comments:
This commentary contains examples of two common faults. The first is a tendency for students to start
writing before they have really understood the poem, but then to gradually arrive at a better interpretation
as they write. The second is to make an overall interpretation and then to maintain it without further
questioning. Perhaps this accounts for the fact that this literary analysis contains a mixture of perceptive and
slightly off-beat interpretations.
The first sentence is not promising. Is it even true? Trees grew long before human beings arrived on earth.
Is it relevant to the poet's message? Only to a certain extent. Also, the poem is about the death of a child,
not a man.
The second paragraph, however, gives a satisfactory outline of what happens in the poem, while the third
paragraph discusses the ambiguity of "We will give you what we can" where the "you" is both the child
and the tree.
There is some confusion between the meanings of "natural", "unnatural" and "nature", and the examples
of unnatural imagery are not explained convincingly. It is not unnatural to dig a hole except in this
particular situation. It is against tradition to plant a tree for a dead child, just as it is against tradition and
nature for a child to die before his father; but can these events be called unnatural or just unusual?
In writing about this, the student misquotes "grove" as "grave" in paragraph 4.
The discussion of the effects of the weather on the tone is valid, as is the significance of the use of the
sequoia to represent the dead child. Unfortunately, the language and syntax used in paragraphs 5 and 6
tends to obscure rather than clarify what the student is trying to say. The next paragraph, beginning
"While the 'native giant' sequoia ... ", is very good as the student shows that he has grasped the central
idea of the poem. It is a pity that at the end, the commentary reverts to the earlier idea of the poem being
about the unification of man and nature. This is a patchy performance which is sometimes marred by
faulty and confusing writing.