Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
AND TERMINOLOG Y
FOR PLAN T PHYSIOLOG Y
UNITS, SYMBOLS ,
AND TERMINOLOGY
FOR PLAN T PHYSIOLOG Y
A Reference for Presentation of
Research Results in the Plant Sciences
Sponsored b y the International Association fo r Plant Physiology
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Printed i n th e Unite d State s o f America
on acid-fre e pape r
CONTENTS
CONTRIBUTORS vii
PREFACE
ix
1
1
22
2
4
3. Statistics Sisson 2
General terms: 2
Measures of Central Tendency 2
Variability 2
Confidence Intervals 2
Test of Hypothesis 3
Regression Analysi s 3
Analysis of Variance 3
Covariance Analysis 3
Nonparametric Test s 4
Miscellaneous 4
7
7
7
8
9
0
1
2
8
0
1
43
5
5
7
0
0
1
3
3
vi Contents
5. Solutions (Ionic Relations) Dainty 5
Abbreviations Use d as Subscripts an d Superscripts 5
The Tables 5
5
5
6
0
0
5
5
8
2
2
5
5
1
1
4
6
11. Plant Molecular Biology and Gene Designations Reardon & Price 9
Terminology 9
Gene Designations 10
7
7
5
109
1
1
3
0
0
1
2
3
4
4
General Considerations 11
Units for Growth Analysis and Yield Components 11
18. Stress Physiology Fuchigami, Maas, Lyons, Rains, Raison, & Shackel
General Stress-Physiolog y Terms 14
5
6
142
3
Contents vi
Chilling Injury 14
Cold Hardiness 14
Water Stress 15
Salinity Stress 15
APPENDICES: PRESENTING SCIENTIFIC DATA 16
A. Some Suggestions About Scientific Writing Salisbury 16
The Sentence 16
Modifying Words 16
Modifying Phrases and Clauses 17
Verbs 17
Some Further Notes about Punctuation 17
Abbreviations 17
Unnecessary Words 17
Words with Special Problems 17
Some Suggestions about Format and Word Processors 18
Summary 18
B. Standards for Effective Presentations Koning
Slide Presentations 18
Poster Presentations 19
i
4
6
1
4
1
3
4
8
2
5
6
8
8
9
3
5
188
9
5
217
CONTRIBUTORS
Mary Barkworth, Utah State University, U.S.A.
Clanton C. Black, University of Georgia, U.S.A.
Bruce G. Bugbee, Utah State University, U.S.A.
Robert E. Cleland, University of Washington, U.S.A.
Jack Dainty, University of Toronto, Canada
Ralph O. Erickson, University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Leslie H. Fuchigami, Oregon Stat e University, U.S.A.
Donald R. Geiger, University of Dayton, Ohio, U.S.A.
Wolfgang W. Haupt, Universtat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany
Ross E. Koning, Eastern Connecticut University, U.S.A.
Willard L. Koukkari, University of Minnesota, U.S.A.
Donald T. Krizek, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A.
James M. Lyons, University of California, Davis, California, U.S.A.
Eugene V . Maas, U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Riverside, California, U.S.A.
John McNeill, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada
Carl A. Price, Rutgers University, New Jersey, U.S.A.
William Rains, University of California, Davis, California, U.S.A.
John K. Raison, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia (deceased)
Ellen Reardon, Rutgers University, New Jersey, U.S.A.
John C. Sager, Kennedy Space Center, Florida, U.S.A.
Frank B. Salisbury, Utah State University, U.S.A.
Michael J. Savage, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Republic of South Africa.
Kenneth Shackel, University of California, Davis, California, U.S.A.
Donald Sisson, Utah State University, U.S.A.
Beatrice M. Sweeney, University of California a t Santa Barbara, U.S.A. (deceased)
Theodore W. Tibbitts, University of Wisconsin-Madison, U.S.A.
Aart J.E. van Bel, Justus-Liebig Universitat, Giessen, Germany
PREFACE
When one person wishes to communicate some information directly to another person, it
is essential that the two speak the same language; that is, the words and symbols must have the
same meaning for both persons. Suc h a thought provides one motivation for the preparation of
this book, which is designed t o be a reference sourc e for plant physiologists and other plant
scientists who are preparing their research results for publication or other presentation. Th e
primary goal is to provide information about the use of units, symbols, and terminology in the
plant sciences , especiall y plan t physiology. I n addition , w e als o provide som e hint s an d
instructions abou t writing and the preparation of posters and slide presentations for scientific
meetings, including a format for presentation of growth-chamber data.
Section I introduces the basics. It s three chapters consider the use of SI units, rules for
botanical nomenclature, and basic principles of statistics. Section s II, III, and IV present more
detail i n the field s o f plant biophysics, biochemistry , and growth and development. Thes e
sections emphasize SI units whenever that is appropriate, but they also contain many lists of
terms that are used in the plant sciences. Th e appendices contain the hints and instructions for
writing an d for preparing posters an d slide presentations, plus a summary of guidelines for
reporting environmental parameter s for plant experiments in controlled environments. Th e
chapter on biochemistry was modified from The Journal o f Biological Chemistry; i t is included
here as a handy reference. Appendi x C was also prepared for another publication. Al l other
sections were originally prepared for this volume.
Each chapter was first prepared by one or more specialists in the field, and the authors then
sent their chapters to several colleagues. A s a result, the present chapters represent a t least the
beginnings o f a consensu s abou t th e term s an d sometime s symbol s within eac h subfield .
Although th e tim e when al l plan t scientist s agre e o n al l units , symbols, terminology , an d
presentation techniques may be in the distant future (i f it ever arrives), it is hoped that this book
will bring us closer t o such a meeting of the minds. Afte r I had edited the manuscripts sent by
the various authors, the entire book was sent to each author, who often commented about some
chapters beside s hi s o r he r own . Thi s process wa s repeate d severa l time s over a period
exceeding a decade (mostly because the project was set aside several times while other projects
x Preface
were being completed). Durin g this long gestation period, two authors died and several other s
retired! I n spite of the long period from conception t o birth, every chapter includes significant
changes mad e shortly before publication. Th e book presents the most current thinking of its
authors and editor.
The chapters tha t include definitions of terms follow two different approaches : I n some
chapters, terms ar e arranged alphabetically; in others they follow an order in which one term
builds upon the preceding term or terms (a mini-review of the subject). Th e choice of approach
depended upon the author and the subject matter, In the non-alphabetical cases, the number of
terms is rather limited s o that it should be relatively easy to find a term by scanning the lists.
A few references ar e presented, especially where definitions ar e somewhat controversial.
And controversy remains in plant physiology! Pleas e submi t suggestions for future edition s to
me or to the appropriate chapter author .
We have tried to remove inconsistencies an d contradictions althoug h some seem to be inevitable. W e are aware of considerable redundancy, which should make the booklet easier to
use as a reference source. A n editorial inconsistency tha t I have decided to allow concerns the
use of references. Man y show only initials of authors, but when given names were known to me,
I included them. W e have followed a reference style that includes written-out journal names
rather tha n abbreviations and more punctuation than is used in many current journals. Thi s
takes a little more space, but we believe it will make it easier for a reader to use the references.
Several secretaries were involved with the manuscript, but Laura Wheelwright did much
formatting, an d Mary Ann Clark must have spent the equivalent of an intense, full-time year
working on the final formatting of camera-ready copy with much direction from Kirk Jensen,
a Senio r Edito r a t th e Oxfor d University Press. Th e author s an d I wish t o expres s muc h
appreciation to those diligent secretaries; their efforts wer e often "above an d beyond the call of
duty."
F.B. Salisbury
Logan, Utah
Length
Mass
U.S.a
Volume
This char t was prepared by F.B.S. for: Fran k B. Salisbury and Cleon W. Ross. 1969 . Plan t Physiology
First Edition. Wadswort h Publishing Co., Inc., Belmont, California. I t was not used in subsequent edition s
Some letters have been changed to reflect the conventions presented in this book.
A
B
Greek
letter
(italic)
Greek
name
A
B
Alpha
Beta
a
b
Gamma
g
d
e
z
Delta
E
Z
H
E
Z
H
Epsilon
Zeta
Eta
Theta
I
K
Iota
Kappa
Lambda
M
N
M
N
Mu
Nu
Xi
ks, x
P
r
s
t
Tau
Sigma
Upsilon
Phi
Chi
Psi
Omega
th
i
k
1
m
n
o
e(e)
Omicron
Pi
Rho
English
equivalent
(phonetic)
f, ph
ch, kh
ps
o(o)
UNITS, SYMBOLS ,
AND TERMINOLOG Y
FOR PLAN T PHYSIOLOG Y
I
THE BASICS
This sectio n deals mostl y with constructed scientifi c languages. Ho w do people who
want t o communicat e usuall y achiev e a commo n language ? Mostly , we begi n a s
infants an d jus t us e th e languag e unti l meaning s becom e clear . Bu t ther e ar e
problems wit h thi s approach . Fo r on e thing , people i n different part s o f societydifferent geographica l areas , fo r examplehav e forme d differen t languages .
Furthermore, usag e ofte n produce s language s that lac k logi c an d consistency . A s
scientists, w e would like to communicate effectively with everyone else on the plane t
who migh t share our commo n interests . One solution tha t seem s to be fallin g into
place withou t an y directe d effor t i s th e broadenin g acceptanc e o f Englis h a s th e
language o f scienc e (an d muc h o f commerce , etc.) . A second solutio n fo r scienc e
has involve d a consciou s an d directe d menta l effor t t o create consistenc y an d
uniformity. Group s o f scientists hav e tried t o fin d way s to agree o n ho w to expres s
physical quantities , nomenclatur e o f organisms, and mathematica l symbols (among
other things) . I n thi s section, w e present th e thre e constructe d language s that dea l
with physica l quantities , taxonomi c nomenclature, and statistics:
1. Th e Internationa l Syste m of Unit s for expressin g physical quantities ,
2. Th e adopte d convention s for naming plant material; that is , many of th e
important rule s o f taxonomi c nomenclatur e agree d upo n i n Botanica l
Congresses, an d
3. Statistica l procedure s an d thei r notations ; thes e provid e a measur e o f
significance.
All plan t scientist s wh o wor k with quantitativ e measurements, regardles s o f thei r
specialty withi n th e fiel d o f plant physiology or i n other area s o f botany, need t o b e
conversant wit h thes e two international system s of communication plu s the mean s
of evaluatin g th e reliabilit y of their numerica l data.
1
THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF UNITS (SI UNITS)1
Frank B . Salisbury
Plants, Soils , an d Biometeorology Departmen t
Utah Stat e University
Logan, Uta h 84322-4820 , U.S.A .
As modern scienc e cam e into being , it depended mor e and more upon the accurat e
measurement o f physica l quantities . Suc h measuremen t require s a syste m o f
standards that i s recognized an d accepted b y all those who would communicate their
measurements t o eac h other . I n respons e t o thi s need , th e metric syste m o f
measurement wa s devised durin g the Frenc h Revolutio n (178 9 t o 1799) . I t was an
attempt to devis e a decima l syste m of measure s tha t woul d simplif y and unif y
calculations. Nearl y a centur y later, recognizin g the nee d t o furthe r improv e th e
system, th e Bureau International des Poids e t Mesures (BIPM ) was se t u p b y th e
Convention du Metre signe d in Paris in 187 5 by seventeen States ; the Convention was
amended i n 1921 . Th e tas k o f th e BIP M i s t o ensur e worldwid e unificatio n o f
physical measurements . I t operates in offices an d laboratories in Sevres, near Paris,
France, unde r supervisio n of the Comite International des Poids e t Mesures (CIPM) ,
which consist s o f 1 8 members, each fro m a different State . Th e CIP M itself come s
under the authorit y of the Conference General e de s Poids e t Mesures (CGPM) , which
consists o f delegates fro m al l the Membe r States (4 6 States i n March, 1991 ) o f th e
Convention du Metre. Th e CGP M meets a t present ever y four years , but th e CIP M
meets ever y year.
By th e mi d twentiet h century , th e metri c syste m wa s bein g widel y use d i n
science, bu t i n many cases, individua l branches of science ha d developed thei r own
specialized unit s an d terms . Fo r example , th e CG S (centimeter.gram.second )
system o f mechanical units , used especially in physics, included such terms a s dyne,
erg, poise , stokes , gauss , oersted, an d maxwel l (all no w considered obsolete) . T o
Earl y version s o f thi s chapte r wer e publishe d as Appendi x A i n Plant Physiology, Fourth
Edition, b y F . B . Salisbur y an d Cleo n W . Ross , publishe d by Wadswort h Publishin g Company ,
Belmont, California , 94002 , U.S.A. , an d i n Journal o f Plant Physiology (Salisbury, 1991). Recen t
study o f th e firs t an d second-leve l authoritie s (describe d in thi s chapter ) has le d no t onl y t o a
somewhat differen t approac h but als o t o som e importan t modification s an d change s i n a fe w units
and th e rule s for thei r use .
4 The
Basics
D'UNITES (SI)
The SI is a so-called coherent unit system, in which the equation s between numerica l
values hav e exactl y th e sam e for m (includin g the numerica l factors ) a s th e corre sponding equation s betwee n th e quantities . Thi s i s achieved b y defining unit s fo r
the bas e quantitie s (th e base units), and then derivin g further unit s fro m thes e bas e
units based upo n th e equations betwee n th e quantitites. Fo r example, th e equatio n
for spee d (v ) shows speed a s being equal t o th e incrementa l change i n distance (dl )
divided b y the incrementa l chang e i n time (dt) : v = dl/dt. Thu s th e uni t for spee d
is th e mete r pe r second : m/s . Therefore , th e S I include s base units an d derived
units. I n additio n ther e ar e tw o supplementary units, th e radia n (rad , fo r plan e
angle) an d th e steradia n (sr , fo r solid angle) .
The seve n bas e unit s o f th e S I ar e th e meter (length ; metre i s als o used ,
especially i n Britai n an d France) , kilogram (mass), second (time) , ampere (electri c
current), kelvin (thermodynami c temperature) , candela (luminou s intensity) , an d
mole (amoun t o f substance). Thes e units are show n with their symbol s in Table 1 .
Actually, i t i s possible b y combining th e unit s of space (length , area , an d volume )
with those of mass, time, an d temperatur e t o deriv e unit s of any physical quantity .
The basi c uni t o f lengt h i s th e meter (m) , whic h wa s originall y define d a s
equivalent t o th e lengt h of a bar preserve d i n Sevres, France; i n 196 0 i t was defined
as th e lengt h equa l t o 1 650 763.73 wave lengths in vacuum o f the radiatio n corre sponding t o th e transitio n between th e level s 2p10 an d 5d 5 of the krypton-8 6 atom.
6 The
Basics
Unit
Symbol
Length (l )
meter
kilograma
kg
Time (t )
second
Electric curren t (I )
ampere
Thermodynamic temperatur e (T )
kelvin
K (not K )
Luminous intensit y (I )
candelab
cd
Amount o f substance (n , Q )
mole
mol
For historical reasons, the kilogram is the SI base unit rather than the gram. It is a unit of mass rather than weight.
Although weight is an acceptable synonym for mass, plant scientists should be careful to use mass instead of weight
whenever appropriatewhich is most of the time. (Note that the quantity mass is symbolized with italic m, which is not
to be confused with roman m for meter. See ISO Standards Handbook, 1993.)
As a unit of luminous intensity, the candela was traditionally based on the sensitivity of the human eye; we know of no
application in plant physiology. The lux (lx) is a measure of illuminance based on the candela (1 1x = 1 cd. sr. m-2 );
it has been widely used in plant science but should be avoided.
c
The mole should always be used to report the amount of a pure substance, and in such cases the type of substance must
be specified. To report the amount of a mixture or of an unknown substance, mass must be used.
For historica l reasons , th e gra m is not the S I base unit for mass. Th e kilogram
is th e onl y bas e uni t wit h a prefix . I t i s equa l t o th e mas s o f th e internationa l
prototype o f th e kilogram , mad e o f platinum-iridium , kept a t th e BIP M unde r
conditions specifie d b y the firs t CGP M i n 1889 . Not e tha t weight i s technically a
measure o f th e force produce d b y gravity, whereas the kilogra m is a uni t o f mass.
Mass i s a fundamenta l quantity that doe s no t chang e with the forc e of gravity (for
example, wit h location) . Th e weigh t o f objects , o n th e othe r hand , i s abou t 1
percent les s a t th e equato r tha n a t th e pole s an d i s 82 percent les s o n th e moon .
Thus i t is technically incorrec t t o use the word weight in conjunction with the uni t
kilogram. Th e prope r uni t for weight is the newton . (O n earth, the weight of a 10
kg mass is about 98 newtons.) Although in many technical fields and i n everyday us e
the term "weight* is considered as an acceptable synonym for "mass* plant scientists
should use the term "mass* whenever it is appropriate.
A balanc e balances th e mas s o f a n unknow n object agains t a define d mass;
hence, a balance measure s true mass. Al l balances depend upon an accelerationa l
force fo r thei r function , bu t th e magnitud e of th e accelerationa l forc e doe s no t
affect th e reading . Unfortunately , the magnitud e of accelerational force doe s affec t
the measuremen t o f mas s o n electroni c "balances " becaus e the y ar e reall y scale s
8 The
Basics
Prefix
da
(10)
deci
hecto
(102)
centi
kilo
(10 )
milli
mega
micro
giga
(106)
9
Prefix
Symbol
deka
tera
peta
(10 )
Symbol
nano
12
pico
1S
femto
P
f
18
(10 )
(10 )
Factor
(10-1)
(10-2)
(10-3)
6
(10- )
(10-9)
(10-12)
(10-15)
exa
(10 )
atto
(10-18)
zetta
(1021)
zepto
yotta
(1024)
yocto
(10-21)
24
(10- )
' Th e firs t syllabl e of every prefix is accented t o assure that the prefix will retai n its identity.
Table 3 show s som e importan t S I derive d unit s with specia l name s tha t ar e
derived fro m th e bas e unit s and ar e o f value to plan t scientists. (Se e Taylor , 1991 ,
for complet e lists. ) Not e tha t th e standar d acceleratio n du e t o gravit y i s a n
experimentally determined unit, and th e unifie d atomi c mass is an arbitrar y unit.
square meter
m2
3
Definition
m.m
Volume (V )
cubic mete r
m.m.m
Speed or velocity (v )
meters pe r secon d
m.s-1
m.s-1
Force (F )
newton
kg.m.s-2
Energy (E) ,
work (W), hea t (Q )
joule
N.m (m 2.kg.s-2)
Power (P )
watt
J.s-1 (m 2.kg.s-3)
Pressure (p )
pascal
Pa
N.m-2 (kg.s-2.m-1)
Hz
cycle s-1
coulomb
A.s
Electric potentia l (V , )
volt
Electric resistanc e (R )
ohm
ft
V.A-1
Electric capacitance (C )
farad
A.v-1 ( - 1)
c.v.1
Concentration (c )
mol.m-3
mol.m-3
Irradiance (energy : E )
W.m-2
J.s-1.m-2
Irradiance (mole s of
photons)
mol.m-2.s-1
mol.m- 2.s-1
Spectral irradiance
(moles o f photons )
moles pe r squar e
meter secon d nano meter
mol.m-2.s-1. nm-1
amperes pe r mete r
A.m-1
A.m-1
Activity (o f radioactiv e
source: A )
becquerel
Bq
s-1
Standard acceleratio n
due t o gravity
standard acceleratio n gn
due t o gravity
9.806 6 5 m s-2
Unified atomi c
mass unit
Unified atomi c
mass uni t
1/12 o f mass of 12 C
Quantit y symbol s ar e fro m IS O Standard s Handbook , 1993 . Ther e ar e man y varizitions o f suc h symbols .
Technically, velocity i s a vector quantit y requirin g specification o f a magnitud e (speed ) an d a direction, bu t mag nitude i s most importan t i n plan t science .
10 Th
e Basics
15. Third-leve l sources an d Englis h styl e manual s recommend tha t sentence s shoul d no t begi n with
numerals. Becaus e a unit symbol is always proceeded wit h a number (numeral), a sentence can
never begi n wit h a uni t name o r symbol . Wheneve r possible , a writer shoul d recas t a sentenc e
so it does not begi n with a numeral; if that can't b e done, th e numbe r and unit name shoul d b e
spelled out .
16. Compoun d symbol s forme d b y multiplication may contain a produc t do t ( ) t o indicat e multiplication; internationa l rule s sa y tha t thi s ma y b e replace d wit h a perio d o r a space . I n th e
United States, the produc t do t i s recommended. Compoun d symbol s formed by division can use
a slas h (/) , a horizonta l lin e with units above an d below , or b e indicate d by negative exponents ;
e.g., umol. m .s-1, umol.mol- 1 , etc . I n n o cas e shoul d symbol s b e ru n togethe r (e.g. ,
Wm-2).
17. Becaus e compoun d uni t symbol s ar e mathematica l entities , the y mus t no t includ e nonsymbo l
words o r abbreviations . Thi s i s not tru e of unit names without numerals. Thu s an author mus t
avoid " umol CO2 (mo l o f air)- 1" bu t ca n write: "Dat a ar e presente d a s micromole s o f CO 2
per mol e o f air ( umol.mol- 1)." (Se e discussio n i n the text. )
18. D o no t mi x symbols an d spelled-ou t uni t name s (e.g. , W per squar e meter) , an d never mi x SI
units or thei r accepte d relative s (e.g. , liter, minute, hour , day , plane angle in degrees) wit h units
of another system suc h as the CG S or th e Englis h system (e.g. , mile s per liter , kg ft-3, o r gram s
per ounc e fo r th e quantit y o f fat i n a food) .
19. Th e percen t symbo l (% ) i s an acceptabl e uni t for us e with th e SI : % = 0.01 . Whe n used , a
space i s left betwee n th e symbo l % an d th e numbe r b y which it i s multiplied: X = 25 % = 2 5
x 0.0 1 = 0.25 . Rathe r tha n usin g such terms as "percentage b y volume" (meaningless becaus e
% i s simply a number) , a recommende d approac h i s to presen t dat a a s mL/L, umol/mol , g/kg ,
mol/L, mol/kg , etc . (Taylor , 1995).
20. Uni t symbol s ar e printe d i n roman typ e (uprigh t letters); italic letters (slanted ) ar e reserve d for
quantity symbols , suc h a s A fo r area , m fo r mass , t fo r time , and fo r water potential . Fo r
typewriting or longhand , underlinin g may be use d a s a substitute fo r italics . Accordin g t o thi s
rule, th e Gree k mu , u , whe n use d a s the prefi x symbol fo r micro , should b e printe d i n roma n
type (no t i n italics).
Numerals, often with Symbols
21. A spac e i s lef t betwee n th e las t digi t o f a numera l an d it s uni t symbol . A produc t do t () ,
space, o r slas h (/ ) i s use d betwee n uni t symbol s when mor e tha n on e i s used ; se e rul e 16 .
Exceptions ar e th e degree , minute, and second symbol s for angles or latitude s (e.g., 30 north) .
Note tha t th e degre e Celsiu s (C ) i s a singl e uni t symbo l (n o spac e betwee n an d C ) tha t
should als o b e proceede d b y a space . I t i s incorrect t o us e 1 2 t o 2 5 C (tha t is , to us e
without C) ; correc t form s are: 1 2 C to 2 5 C, (12 to 25) C , or 12-2 5 C .
22. Whe n a quantity is used i n an adjectiva l sense, Englis h rule s of grammar suggest tha t a hyphe n
should b e used betwee n the numera l and the uni t name: a five-hundred-watt lamp . Bu t when
unit symbols ar e used , the hyphe n shoul d b e omitted: a 50 0 W lamp (becaus e th e symbo l i s a
mathematical entity , an d th e hyphe n coul d b e mistake n for a minu s sign).
23. I n th e Unite d States , th e perio d i s used a s the decima l marker although some countrie s (e.g.,
France, Germany , Grea t Britain ) use a comma o r a raised period .
Continued
12 Th
e Basics
The CIP M recognized i n 196 9 tha t users of SI will also wish t o emplo y with i t
certain unit s that ar e no t par t o f it , bu t tha t ar e importan t an d ar e widel y used.
These unit s (along with the unifie d atomi c mass unit and the standard acceleration
due t o gravity) , ar e show n in Table 5 . Not e tha t a goal in settin g up th e International Syste m of Units was to produc e a coherent system , as noted above , a system
in whic h derive d unit s ar e variou s combination s o f th e bas e unit s withou t th e
necessity o f including numerical multiplication factors. Al l of the unit s in Table 5
do requir e th e us e o f suc h factors , an d henc e the y los e th e advantage s o f th e
coherence o f SI units . I t was recommended that thei r us e be restricted t o specia l
cases. I t i s clear, however , that plant scientists will use th e minute , hour, and day
(not to mention the week, month, and year) without hesitation in reporting methods
and results . Th e liter is also a much more convient unit for plant scientists than the
cubic meter, which i s th e officia l S I unit of volume. Thus , we can b e thankfu l fo r
the CIPM' s decision s in 196 9 and fo r Table 5!
Table 5. Some Units used with the SI but not Officially Part of SIa
Name
Symbol
Value i n SI units
minute
min
1 min = 60 s
hour
1 h = 6 0 min = 3600 s
day
1 d = 2 4 h = 8 6 400 s
degree
1 = ( /180 ) ra d
minute
second
"
liter (litre)
L (l)
1 L = 1 dm3 = 10- 3 m 3
1 t = 10 3 kg
standard acceleration g
due t o gravit y c
9.80
6 65 m.s-2
Becaus e thes e units must be multiplied by a factor t o mak e the m equivalen t t o SI units, the y are no t coheren t in the
sense of othe r SI units.
The actua l value of th e unifie d atomi c mass uni t in SI unit s must be determined by experimentation. A t presen t it is
considered
consideredto
to be: u = 1.66 0 540 2(10)
2(
x 10- 27 kg . Th e uncertainty of the last tw o figures, a t the level of one standard
deviation, i s shown i n parentheses.
c
Thi s valu e was confirmed in 191 3 b y the 5t h CGPM . It s symbol , g n, shoul d b e use d instea d o f th e man y symbols
currently used t o indicat e one acceleratio n due t o gravity at the earth's surface (e.g. , g , g, G, G , Xg , etc.).
Table 6 includes som e unit s that were use d with the metric syste m but tha t th e
CIPM recommend s shoul d no t b e use d wit h the SI . A fe w of these units continu e
to b e in wide use among plan t scientists .
3. SOME SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Although mos t o f th e rule s i n Table 4 are explaine d adequatel y in th e table , a few
of the m a s well as some o f the unit s in Tables 5 and 6 are worthy of discussion .
A. Language Conventions with Si-Unit Names and Symbols.2 Writte n ou t
names fo r the unit s follow the rules of grammar (English or other language) , whereas th e uni t symbols shoul d b e though t o f a s mathematica l entitie s b y which th e
preceeding numera l i s multiplied. Fo r example , unit names begin with a lowercase
letter unles s grammatica l rule s cal l fo r uppercas e (i.e. , a t th e beginnin g o f a
sentence an d i n titles) , bu t th e uppe r o r lowercas e o f symbols mus t neve r b e
changed regardles s o f where the y appear. I n English, names ar e often mad e plural
Rule s in Table 4 that bea r on thi s discussio n are : 1, 7, 8, 15, 17, & 22.
14 Th
e Basics
by addition o f s, but S I symbols never are . Number s (usuall y written out ) followe d
by uni t name s use d i n an adjectiva l sens e can be connecte d wit h a hyphe n (e.g. , a
fifty-watt lamp ) bu t th e hyphe n i s not use d wit h symbol s (a 50 W lamp). Becaus e
of the mathematica l natur e o f symbols, it is desirable t o us e them instea d o f names .
Of course the nam e ca n be used th e firs t tim e i t appears if the reader migh t not b e
familiar wit h th e uni t o r it s symbol.
In som e language s i t i s no t uncommo n fo r a numera l t o begi n a sentence ; i n
English thi s should b e avoided, preferabl y by recasting th e sentence, but if necessar y
by writing out th e numera l an d it s unit name .
Table 6. Some Discarded Metric Units
Discarded Metric Unit
Acceptable SI Unit
micron (u )
micrometer ( um )
millimicron (mu )
angstroma (A)
nanometer (nm)
bara (bar )
calorie (cal)
degree Celsiu s (C )
hectarea (ha )
10 000 m2 or 0.01 km 2
mole of photons or quant a (mol)
einstein (E )
dalton (Da )
molal solution (m )
mol-kg-1
mg.kg-1
{umol.mol-1 (e.g., CO 2 i n air)
(Use k g for mixe d substances and mo l fo r
pure substances and gases. )
1000 mm 3.m-3 (volume ; e.g., liquids)
-1
ug.kg-1
nmol.mol-1
mm3.m-3 (volume ; e.g., liquids)
aIn vie w of existin g practice i n certai n fields , th e CIPM (1978 ) considered tha t these units could b e use d with the SI
temporarily although they should no t be introduced wher e they are no t use d a t present.
data ar e presente d o n a fresh-mass basis (mg.kg- 1)." Thi s rule i s often overlooke d
by plan t physiologists , wh o eve n sometime s construc t meaningles s symbol s t o
present thei r data : mg/gf w (meanin g milligrams per gram of fresh weight) or mg (kg
fresh mass)- 1. Th e rul e was discussed b y Downs (1988) and perhap s in othe r thir d
level source s o f which I am not aware , but i t has otherwise been largel y overlooked
by plant physiologists. Th e rule is emphasized, however, by the second-level authorities
(ISO Standard s Handbook , 1993 ; NIS T S P 811 , Taylor , 1995) . Plan t scientist s
should improv e the rigo r of their presentation s b y adhering to this rule .
B. Space Between Numerals and Units and Within Compound Units. Fo r
some unknow n reaso n i t ha s becom e increasingl y commo n t o omi t th e spac e
between a numeral and the unit that follows (e.g. , a 50mL flask) . I n the worst cases,
the spac e o r produc t do t i s omitted betwee n symbol s in a multipl e unit, creatin g
new symbol s tha t hav e n o meanin g (e.g. , Wm- 2, umolm-2S- 1, etc.) . Thi s practic e
breaks Rule s 16 , 19 , and 2 1 i n Tabl e 4 , an d leavin g ou t th e spac e ca n confus e
readers. Us e o f th e produc t do t i s highl y recommende d i n th e Unite d State s
(Taylor, 1995) , but plan t scientists hav e used it only infrequently. It s consistent us e
would remove any ambiguity from multipl e units and would overcome the tendency
to run units together.
C. Italics for Quantity Symbols, Roman for Unit Symbols. Thi s simple practice
is stated i n Rul e 20 , Table 4 , but man y plan t scientists seem t o b e unawar e of it .
Remember tha t unit symbols are printed in roman type (upright letters); italic letters
(slanted) ar e reserve d fo r quantit y symbols, such a s A fo r area , m fo r mass , t fo r
time, and 7 fo r water potential. Fo r typewriting or longhand, underlining may be
used as a substitute for italics. Accordin g to this rule, the Greek mu , u , whe n used
as the prefi x symbol for micro, should be printed in roman (i.e., upright) type whenever possible . Unfortunately , not all word processors allow this. (Not e that Greek ,
Roman, or eve n Cyrilli c alphabets ca n be printed in either roma n or italic type).
D. Only One per or Slash in a Multiple Unit. Thi s is another simple rule that
plant scientist s shoul d appl y more widel y (Rul e 30, Table 4) : D o no t us e tw o or
more "pers " o r slashe s i n th e sam e expressio n becaus e the y ar e ambiguous .
Negative exponent s avoi d thi s problem : J-K-1.mol- 1 (not J/K/mol) ; J/K.mol i s acceptable becaus e al l symbols to th e right of the slash belong to the denominator. I f
this is written out, i t becomes: joule s per kelvi n mole.
E. Only Base Units in Denominators. A s note d i n Rul e 31 , Tabl e 4 , man y
third-level source s sugges t tha t th e denominato r shoul d no t b e a multipl e o r
submultiple o f a n S I bas e uni t (e.g. , uN.m- 2 bu t no t N.um- 2). A s edito r o f
Journal of Plan t Physiolog y during the pas t si x years, I have found thi s rul e t o b e
the mos t difficul t t o enforce . I t goe s against much tradition and sometime s seem s
illogical an d unreasonable . Fo r example , authors hav e long reported amount s or
concentrations o f metabolites, hormones, and other compounds as ug/mg, nmol/mL,
etc. I t ma y seem t o g o against one's intuition to us e the equivalent s of thos e tw o
examples: g/kg , umol/ L (or , using "true" SI units: mmol/m-3 ).
Now I learn tha t th e rul e of onl y base unit s i n denominator s is recommended
solely i n third-leve l sources bu t i s no t a n officia l S I rul e an d i s no t i n th e IS O
Standards Handbook or NIST SP 811 (Taylor, 1995), which are second-level sources
with virtually as much authority as the primary SI publication. I t is not necessar y to
16 Th
e Basics
18 Th
e Basics
Goldman, Davi d T., and R.J. Bell , editors. 1986 . Th e International System of Units (SI). Nationa l
Bureau o f Standards Specia l Publicatio n 330. U . S. Department o f Commerce/National Burea u
of Standards. [Se e Taylo r (1991 ) for th e mos t recent version of this publication.]
Incoll, L.D., S.P . Long, and M.R. Ashmore. 1977 . S I units in publications in plant science. Curren t
Advances i n Plant Sciences 9(4):331-343 . [Thi s article recommended severa l practices that ar e
now in wide use b y plant scientists. I t was a kind o f historical turning point.]
ISO Standards Handbook. 1993 . Quantities and Units. Internationa l Organization for Standardization, Geneve . [Thi s i s th e highl y authorative , second-leve l reference . I t i s availabl e fro m
American Nationa l Standards Institute , 11 West 42n d Street, Ne w York, NY 10036. ]
Mills, Ian, Tomislav Cvitas, Klaus Homann, Nikola Kallay, and Kozo Kuchitsu. 1995. Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry 2nd Edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications,
Oxford, London, Endinburgh, Boston, Palo Alto, & Melbourne.
20 Th
e Basics
CONSULTANTS
n Sage r
y Space Center , Florid a
Barry N . Taylor *
. Inst . of Standards & Technolog y
, Maryland
*Dr. Soko l i s president emeritu s o f th e U.S. Metri c Association an d a member of the National Conference o n
Weights an d Measures . H e i s a certified metricatio n specialist Dr . Taylor i s the U. S. representative on th e CGPM .
2
RULES FOR BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE
John McNeil l
Royal Ontari o Museum
100 Queen's Park
Toronto, M5S 2C6, Canad a
and
Mary E. Barkwort h
Biology Departmen t
Utah Stat e Universit y
Logan, Uta h 84322-5300, U.S.A.
The following discussion provides some recommendations for documenting the plant
material use d i n experimenta l an d othe r studie s an d summarize s th e rule s o f
nomenclature tha t hav e been establishe d a t botanica l congresses hel d ever y five o r
six years for ove r a century (for the mos t recent editio n o f the rules, see Greuter e t
al., 1994) .
1. DOCUMENTATION
22 Th
e Basics
A. Family names. Famil y names are plura l nouns. The y should be written ou t
in full , wit h th e initia l lette r capitalized , bu t the y ar e usuall y no t italicize d o r
otherwise se t ou t fro m th e res t o f th e tex t i n publication s fro m English-speakin g
countries. Famil y names , apar t fro m nin e exceptions , ar e base d o n th e ste m o f a
generic nam e t o whic h th e suffi x -acea e i s attached . Eigh t o f th e exception s ar e
simple alternatives : Crucifera e [alternativ e base d o n genu s = Brassicaceae] ,
Compositae [ = Asteraceae] , Graminea e [ = Poaceae] , Guttifera e [ = Clusiaceae] ,
Labiatae [ = Lamiaceae] , Leguminosa e [ = Fabaceae ] (bu t se e below), Palma e [ =
Arecaceae], and Umbellifera e [ = Apiaceae] . Th e alternativ e name s ma y be use d
instead o f th e standar d for m bu t nee d no t be . I t is , however , desirabl e t o b e
consistent withi n a paper (i.e. , do not use , fo r example , Poaceae an d Leguminosa e
in the sam e paper) .
The nint h alternativ e name , Papilionaceae , ca n b e use d fo r th e papilionoi d
legumes i f they are regarde d a s a famil y distinc t fro m th e caesalpinioi d an d mimosoid legumes . Th e standar d form s fo r thes e thre e group s o f legumes , i f eac h i s
regarded a s a family , ar e Fabacea e [ = Papilionaceae] , Caesalpiniaceae , an d Mimosaceae. Th e nam e Leguminosa e (Fabacea e i n th e broa d sense ) canno t b e use d if
these three units are treate d a s distinct families .
B. Names of genera. Generic names ar e compose d o f a singl e word . The y
should be italicized, underlined, or se t off in some other wa y from regula r tex t (e.g. ,
written i n roma n i f th e tex t i s italicized) , and hav e th e initia l lette r capitalized .
They ar e singula r nouns, not adjectives . The y should be written out i n ful l unles s
they are use d i n combinatio n with a specifi c epithe t a s the nam e of a species (se e
next item) .
24 Th
e Basics
otherwise indicate d parenthetically ) immediatel y after the first mention o f the name ;
e.g., Achnatherum hymenoides (Roeme r & Schultes ) Barkwort h [ = Oryzopsis
hymenoides (Roeme r & Schultes) Ricke r o r Stipa hymenoides Roemer & Schultes] ;
or Elymus lanceolatus (Scribner & J. G . Smith) Goul d [ = Agropyron dasystachyum
(Hooker) Scribne r & J. G. Smith] .
C. Names of Cultivated Plants. Th e name s of cultivated plant s follo w the rule s
of nomenclatur e fo r othe r plant s i n s o fa r a s thes e ar e applicabl e (e.g. , Triticum
aestivum L . for th e commonl y cultivate d species o f wheat), but name s of cultivate d
varieties or race s (terme d "cultivars") ar e subject to additiona l rules. Th e nam e of
a cultivar follow s that of the lowes t botanical rank to which it can be assigned. Fo r
example, cultivar s o f whea t woul d hav e th e cultiva r nam e give n afte r Triticum
aestivum, bu t fo r hybri d te a ros e cultivars , which ar e th e resul t o f extensiv e inter specific hybridization , the cultiva r nam e would follow th e generi c nam e Rosa.
The cultivar nam e is not italicized, but its initial letter is in uppercase. I t should
be pu t betwee n singl e quotatio n marks , e.g. , Taxus baccata 'Variegata' ; unti l
recently i t coul d als o b e precede d b y cv . (fo r cultivar) , e.g. , Taxus baccata cv .
Variegata. Th e grou p o f cultivar s t o whic h it belong s ma y also b e indicated , e.g. ,
Rosa (Hybri d Tea ) 'Peace' .
The name s o f graft-chimera s consis t o f th e name s o f th e components , i n
alphabetical order , connecte d b y th e additio n (plus ) sign : "+ " (e.g. , Cytisus purpureus + Laburnum anagyroides; Syringa xchinensis + S . vulgaris). Fo r furthe r
information o n th e name s o f cultivated plants , see Trehane e t al . (1995).
D. Pleomorphic Fungi. Fung i with differen t phase s i n thei r life-cycl e can hav e
different name s applie d t o thei r various states. Th e fungu s i n all its parts is known
by the nam e of the sexually reproducing stage (teleomorph) , but , where convenient ,
separate name s ca n b e use d fo r th e stage s reproducing b y asexual method s (ana morphs). Anamorp h name s mak e clea r th e phase of the fungu s tha t has been use d
in physiologica l studie s an d s o should b e cited wherever appropriate .
E. Commo n Names . Commo n name s (o r specially formed name s in vernacular
languages; e.g. , English ) ar e permitte d i n mos t journal s o f plan t physiolog y an d
related sciences , but th e scientific name and its author(s) should always be stated in
parentheses immediatel y following th e firs t us e of the common or vernacular name.
REFERENCES
Bailey Hortorium . 1976 . Hortu s third . Macmillan , New York; Collie r Macmillan , London.
1290 p .
Brummitt, R.K. , an d C.E . Powell . 1992 . Author s o f Plant Names . Roya l Botani c Gardens , Kew .
p 732 .
Fosberg, F.R. , an d M.-H . Sachet . 1965 . Manua l for Tropical Herbaria . Internationa l Burea u fo r
Taxonomy an d Nomenclature , Utrecht . p 13 2 (Regnum veg. 39).
Gledhill, D . 1985 . Th e Name s of Plants. Cambridg e University Press, Cambridg e & New York.
Greuter, W. , F.R . Barrie , H.M . Burdet , W.G . Chaloner , V . Demoulin , D.L. Hawksworth , P.M .
Jorgensen, D.H . Nicolson , P.C. Silva , P . Trehane, an d J . McNeill. 1994 . Internationa l Code o f
Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code). Koelt z Scientific Books, Konigstei n Germany. (Regnum
veg. 131) .
26 Th
e Basics
Consultants
Werner Greute r Noel
Botanischer Garte n Ne
Berlin, German y Bronx
H. Holmgren
w York Botanical Garde n
, New York
David L . Hawkswort h *
CAB-International Mycological Institut e
Kew, England
* Th e author s of this section wis h t o expres s special thanks to Professo r Hawksworth for hi s additions o f material o n funga l nomenclature , which were particularl y helpful.
3
STATISTICS
Donald V . Sisson
Agricultural Experimen t Statio n an d
Department o f Mathematics & Statistic s
Utah Stat e Universit y
Logan, Uta h 84322-481 0
1.
GENERAL TERMS
27
28 Th
e Basics
or the su m of all the observations (EX ) divide d b y the number o f observations (n).
median Th e middle observation afte r th e data have been ordered or ranked. I f the
number o f observation s i s a n eve n number , i t i s th e averag e o f th e tw o middl e
numbers afte r ranking . I t i s not affecte d b y outliers.
mode Th e observation tha t occurs with the greatest frequency. I t is not very useful
in smal l samples .
3. VARIABILITY
range (R ) Th
and i s called th e standard error of the mean. Th e standar d error o f the mea n is to
the mea n wha t th e standar d deviation i s to an individua l observation.
Statistics 2
pooled variance I f the assumption of equal variances holds, the information within
groups is pooled t o obtai n
and th e formul a for standard error o f the differenc e betwee n tw o means become s
CONFIDENCE INTERVALS
30 Th
e Basics
where
TEST OF HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesi s i s rejected i f the calculate d t value exceeds th e value in the t-table ,
with n - 1 degrees o f freedom.
B. Differenc e Between Two Population Means. Fo r the difference between two
population means , th e conditio n i s stated a s
where 8 (delta) i s a given value (usually 0) and
22
Statistics 3
, the condition
and
6.
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
simple linear regression A procedure for relating two continuous variables when
one variabl e (dependen t variable ) i s expresse d a s a linea r functio n o f th e othe r
(independent variable) . A commo n us e i s t o predic t on e variabl e base d o n th e
information provide d by the other . Th e for m o f the equatio n is
where Y
32 Th
e Basics
intercept I
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
Statistics 3
Degrees of
SV
DF
Treatments
k-1
Experimental
Error
k(n-1)
Total
Kn-1
Freedom
Sums of Squares
SS
Mean Square
MS
34 Th
e Basics
Sv
DF
Treatments
Blocks
Experimental
Error
Toral
SS
MS
k-1
b-1
(k-1)(b-1)
kb-1
iii. Latin square design. I n the lati n square design the experimenta l units
are groupe d o r blocke d i n tw o dimension s (usuall y designate d a s row s an d
columns) a s oppose d t o on e dimensiona l blockin g i n th e randomize d bloc k
design. Eac h treatment occur s once i n each ro w and once in each column. Th e
number o f treatment s i s equa l t o th e numbe r o f row s an d th e numbe r o f
columns. Th e linea r mode l is
where Yijk represent s a n individual experimental unit response ,
u i s the overal l mean ,
ii i s the effec t o f the ith treatment,
Bj is the effec t o f the jth row,
Yk (gamma ) is the effec t o f the k th column ,
Eijk i s the random effect associate d wit h the experimental uni t in th e
jth ro w and k t h column that was assigned to the i th treatment .
If we let k equal the number of treatments (or rows or columns) an d Y i b e the
average o f the ith treatment, Yj. be th e averag e of the jth row, Y k b e th e aver age of the k th column , the calculation s fo r the analysis-of-varianc e table ar e in
Table 3.
Statistics 3
SV
Treatments
DF
SS
MS
k-1
rows
k -1
columns
k-1
Experimental
Error
(k -1 )(k- 2)
total
k2-1
36 Th
e Basics
Column Averag e
overall
average
Main Effect i s the effec t o f one facto r averaging over the level s o f all of th e
other factors . Thes e ar e teste d i n the analysi s of variance usin g an F tes t
(where th e mea n squar e erro r i s usually th e denominator) , a s indicated i n
Table 5.
Table 5. Partial analysis of variance table for a two-way factorial experimentmain
effects.
SV
df
A main
effect
a-1
B main
effect
b-1
MS
SS
Interaction is the situatio n wher e differences among the levels of one factor, say
factor A , change fro m leve l to leve l o f the secon d factor , say factor B. Th e tes t
for a n interactio n i s also mad e in the analysi s of variance table a s indicated i n
Table 6 .
Table 6. Partial analysis of variance table for a two-way factorial experimentinteraction.
SV
df
AB
in
teraction
(a-b)(b-1)
SS
MS
Statistics 3
3,
etc ,
38 Th
e Basics
iii. Orthogonal Polynomials. A
compariso n amon g mean s whe n
regression effects ar e emphasize d and th e objectiv e is to estimate th e for m
of th e response , such as linear, quadratic , cubic, etc. Th e calculations ar e
similar t o linea r combinations , wit h appropriat e weightin g coefficient s
derived fo r eac h ter m i n the polynomial.
COVARIANCE ANALYSIS
where the ne w term, pXij , i s the effec t o f the germination on that experimental unit.
(See table 6.)
Table 6. Simple linear analysis of covariance table for a randomized block design.
Deviations from Regression
Sv
df
tre atments
k-1
lbocks
experimental
error
treatment plus
experimantal
error
SSx
b-1
(k-1)(b-1)
b(k-1)
(treatment plus
experimental
error)
error
Adj Means
F for testing the equality of adjusted means =
SP
SSy
dF
SS
MS
40 Th
e Basics
9. NONPARAMETRIC TESTS
These are test s tha t mak e a few or n o assumptions regardin g the underlyin g distribution o f th e variable . Th e powe r i s usuall y les s tha n tha t o f a correspondin g
parametric test .
A. Sign Test. A tes t fo r th e media n o f a population . I t classifie s eac h
observation a s being either above (+) o r below (-) the hypothesized median and then
tests to see if the observed proportio n abov e the median , P, differs fro m 0. 5 by using
either standar d binomia l table s o r the norma l approximation to th e binomial :
Statistics 4
with d f = ( r - l)( c - 1)
or th e expecte d numbe r in the i th ro w and jth column.
where
and c
r = th e numbe r o f rows,
= th e numbe r o f columns.
Germinating
Not Germinating
O11a
O12
Group 1
Rib
R1
Group 2
021
O22
R2
Group 3
O31
O32
R3
C1
C2
nd
Cjc
a Oij represents the number of individuals in the ith row and jth column.
b Ri represents the total of the ith row.
c Cj represents the total of the jth column.
d n is the total sample size.
10.
MISCELLANEOUS
Consultants
Gary Richardson
Colorado Stat e University
Fort Collins , Colorado
II
PLANT BIOPHYSICS
The science o f plant physiology relies heavil y upon a variety of biophysical measurements. I t is the goa l of this section t o summarize the symbols, units, and terms tha t
are use d t o expres s th e result s o f thes e measurements . Uniformit y o f expressio n
seems highl y desirable , s o thi s sectio n emphasize s recommende d S I unit s an d
symbols. A t th e sam e time, i t is recognized tha t many plant scientists will continu e
to us e othe r unit s an d symbols , s o acceptabl e alternative s ar e presente d i n a few
cases (e.g. , millimole s pe r lite r a s a n alternativ e t o mole s pe r cubi c meter) .
Definitions o f biophysical term s ar e als o given.
Many physica l parameter s ca n b e considere d a s pairs , wit h on e o f th e pai r
expressing a quantit y an d it s partne r expressin g a potentia l fo r transfe r o f th e
quantity across a barrier. Thus , joules per kilogram are used as units to express th e
quantity of hea t energ y in some substanc e unde r consideration , whil e temperatur e
differences ar e use d t o expres s th e potentia l fo r transfer o f heat fro m on e poin t t o
another (i.e. , from a point o f higher temperature to a point of lower temperature) .
In a thermodynami c system , th e paramete r expressin g th e quantit y is sai d t o b e
extensive (th e valu e i s th e su m o f th e valu e fo r subdivision s of th e system ; e.g. ,
volume), and the parameter expressing the transfer potential is said t o be intensive
(has the sam e value fo r an y subdivision of the system ; e.g., pressure) . Mas s factor s
lend themselve s wel l t o suc h a n analysis . Th e quantit y o f mas s i s expresse d a s
kilograms or moles , whil e the potential s fo r transfe r ar e expresse d i n various ways:
gases pressur
water wate
hydrogen ion s p
in water
4
BASIC THERMODYNAMIC QUANTITIES
Michael J . Savag e
Department o f Agronomy
University o f Nata l
Pietermaritzburg 320 1
Republic o f South Afric a
The purpos e o f thi s chapte r i s to presen t a simple treatmen t o f some o f th e basi c
thermodynamic concepts involve d in plant physiology, and especially those relatin g
to water potential and its measurement. Th e concepts will be briefly applied to plant
water potentia l an d to water potentia l measuremen t techniques .
1. BASIC CONCEPTS AND THE CHEMICAL POTENTIAL
45
46 Plant
Biophysics
and
Entropy was first introduce d i n classical thermodynamics to provid e a quantitative basi s fo r th e commo n observatio n tha t naturall y occurring processe s hav e a
particular direction . Fo r example , the flow of heat energ y occurs fro m a hotter t o
a coole r region . Equation s 2 an d 3 represen t statement s o f th e second law of
thermodynamics.
Mechanical wor k occur s whe n work done on a system results i n motion . I f F
(with uni t N ) i s the componen t o f the force acting in the directio n o f the displace ment (dl) , th e mechanica l work , dW, equals F.dl. I n this case, d W = F.dl = (F/A)
(A.dl) =
P . d V , where P , whic h i s forc e (F)/are a (A) , i s th e externa l pressur e
exerted o n th e syste m resultin g i n a volume change, dV (= A .dl) .
Combining the first and second law s of thermodynamics (Equations 1 and 2) and
the equatio n d W = P dV describin g th e mechanica l wor k done b y the system , we
have:
This equatio n describe s th e interna l energ y change fo r reversibl e an d purel y
mechanical thermodynami c processes. However , different system s may be subjecte d
to wor k don e b y a numbe r o f force s tha t ma y or ma y not includ e pressur e (i.e. ,
mechanical) wor k forces. Othe r work forces could include work of magnetization,
electrical work, etc. T o allow for the possibility of other work forces involved in th e
closed syste m currentl y considered , w e write:
where dW now represents the total of all other form s of work done by the system on
the surroundings . Thi s work term can be expressed as:
where the jth work term is the product of an intensive parameter Y j an d an extensive
parameter X j (Babcock , 1963 ; Bol t an d Frissel , 1960) . (Se e Chapte r 5 fo r lis t o f
subscripts.)
Including all forms o f work done by the system on the surroundings, the chang e
in interna l energy fo r a closed syste m is expressed by:
48 Plant
Biophysics
so that :
This equation expresse s th e relationship between the Gibbs free energ y and th e
chemical potentia l o f species i. Th e chemical potential of species i roughly indicates
the fre e energ y associated wit h it an d available for performing work. Fo r instance ,
considering th e chemica l potentia l fo r water, u w,
where the i' indicate s tha t th e summation cannot includ e th e water component a s
it has already been included . Choosin g T , P, Xj an d n k a s independent variables for
ui, i t can be show n that, where i s a dummy variable in that l . woul d not appea r
if the summatio n were written out :
where
(J mol- 1),
(J mor-1),
and
(J mol- 1).
The quantities Si , Vi , an d Y j ar e partial molar values for entropy, volume, and
intensive paramete r Yj , respectively. Definin g th e i th chemica l species t o b e water ,
we obtai n
d(uw - u
w*
where we define uw* to be the chemica l potentia l o f pure free wate r at a pressure of
101.3 kP a an d a t th e sam e temperatur e a s the wate r wit h chemica l potentia l u w.
Under thes e isothermal conditions, th e temperature difference indicated by dT is zero
so that:
and
where M w (k g mol- 1) i s the partia l mola r mas s of water, the subscripts m , v , f , an d
n refe r to uni t mass, volume, weight (a force), and amount of substance, respectively ;
and g ( m s- 2) i s the acceleratio n du e t o gravity , V w i s the partia l molar volume of
water, an d m ( J kg- 1), v ( J m- 3, N m- 2 or Pa) , f ( J N-1 or m), and n ( J mol- 1)
refer t o th e specific , volumetric , weight , an d mola r wate r potentials , respectivel y
(Rose, 1979 ; Savage , 1978) .
Water potentia l i s the amount of useful work per unit quantity of water done by
means o f externall y applie d force s i n transferring , reversibly and isothermally , a n
infinitesimal amoun t of water fro m som e standard reference stat e to its position in
the soil, plant , or atmosphere . Th e referenc e stat e i s that of pure free wate r at th e
same temperatur e a s th e wate r i n th e syste m and a t a pressur e o f on e standar d
atmosphere, namely, 101. 3 kP a (adapted fro m Taylo r an d Ashcroft, 1972 , p 153 and
Bolt e t al. , 1975) . Th e S I unit of work is the joul e (J) .
50 Plant
Biophysics
Water potentia l ma y be expressed a s the amoun t o f useful wor k per uni t mass ,
volume, weight, o r amount o f substance (mol ) o f water. Plan t physiologist s us e th e
symbol 7 fo r water potentia l an d usually define it to correspond to a volume basi s
( v ). Som e workers hav e used a mass basis ( m ) and others an amount-of-substance
basis ( n ). I n any system o f units,
where, usin g S I units, p w (k g m-3) i s the densit y of liquid water, where p w = p w(T),
T(C) i s the wate r temperature , an d p w = Mw/Vw .
3. ENTHALPY
d E + P.dF + V.dP
= dQ + V.dP
where
dE = dQ - P . d F .
Hence, fo r a n isobari c process , d H i s equa l t o dQ , th e hea t energ y amoun t
transferred. I n thermodynamic chemistry where isobaric processes are more important tha n isovolumi c processes , enthalpy i s of greatest use . Fro m th e definitio n of
Gibbs fre e energy , the chang e in enthalpy can be defined via:
Integrating this equation ove r a vapor pressure range from P = e0 (the saturatio n
vapor pressure ) t o P = e and applying Equation 24:
52 Plant
Biophysics
arises from th e contributio n of the dissolved solutes to the chemical potential o f the
water (Dainty, 1976; Slatyer, 1967), commonly referred to as the osmotic component ,
and may be written in traditional notation a s - Vw dpk where p k (Pa ) is referred
to a s th e osmoti c pressur e arisin g fro m th e k th component . I n mor e moder n
literature, th e secon d ter m i s written as V w. d p o r sometime s V W . d S wher e
p (Pa ) i s termed th e osmotic potential and s (Pa ) th e solute potential. Th e old
(or traditional) ter m osmotic pressure, p k, is always positive whereas the more recen t
term osmoti c potentia l p (o r th e solut e potential , s) , i s always negative .
The thir d term o f Equation 28 ,
expresses th e matric component arising from th e solid matter in the system, in which
the chemica l potential o f water is a function o f water content (Dainty , 1976; Slatyer ,
1967), may be written in traditional notation as - Vw . dt wher e - t (Pa ) is referred
to a s the matric potential. Usin g th e notatio n o f the mor e moder n literature , th e
third term of Equation 28 is usually written V w d m wher e m (Pa) is also referred
to as the matric potential. Th e old (or traditional) ter m t is always positive whereas
the more recen t ter m m i s negative.
Integrating Equation 28 and substituting for the various water potential compo nents, we have, with all terms having Pa as their unit:
in traditiona l notation , or , in more modern potential terminology,
where p is the pressure applied to balance m , the matric potential of the apoplast,
resulting i n a tota l potentia l 7 o f 0 MPa . Hence , th e matri c potential o f th e
apoplast, m , i s equal to - p . I t is usually assumed that the matric potential o f the
apoplast i s equal t o th e tota l wate r potential o f the symplast , s o that th e pressur e
chamber the n measure s the tota l water potential o f the leaf .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This wor k wa s sponsore d b y th e Foundatio n fo r Researc h Development , th e Departmen t o f
Agriculture, an d th e Universit y of Natal South Africa .
54 Plant
Biophysics
REFERENCES
Babcock, K.L. 1963 . Theor y o f the chemica l properties of soil equilibrium. Hilgardi a 34:417-542.
Bolt, G.H . an d M.J . Frissel . 1960 . Thermodynamic s o f soi l water . Netherland s Journa l o f
Agricultural Scienc e 8:57-78 .
Bolt, G.H. , S . Iwata, A.J. Peck , P.AC . Raats , A.A . Rode , G . Vachaud, and A.D. Voronin . 1975 .
Soil physic s terminology. Bulleti n of the Internationa l Soil Science Society 48:26-36.
Dainty, J . 1976 . Wate r relation s o f plan t cells . I n Encyclopedi a o f Plan t Physiology, volume 2 :
Transport i n Plants II: Part A Cells , p 12-35 .
Passioura, J.B . 1980 . Th e meanin g of matric potential. Journa l of Experimental Botany 31:11611169.
Rose, D.A. 1979 . Soi l water: quantities , units, and symbols . Journa l of Soil Science 30:1-15.
Salisbury, F.B . an d C.W . Ross . 1991 . Plan t Physiology , Fourth Edition . Wadswort h Publishing
Company, Belmont , California.
Savage, M.J . 1978 . Wate r potentia l term s and units. Agrochemophysic a 10:5-6 .
Savage, M.J . 1979 . Us e o f th e internationa l system o f unit s in th e plan t sciences . HortScienc e
15:492-495
Savage, M.J. 1982 . Measuremen t o f water potential using thermocouple hygrometers. Unpublishe d
Ph.D. thesis , Universit y of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. 16 2 p.
Savage, M.J . an d A . Cass . 1984 . Measuremen t o f wate r potentia l usin g i n situ thermocoupl e
hygrometers. Advance s i n Agronomy 37: 73-126.
Scholander, P.P. , H.T . Hammel , E.D. Bradstreet , an d E.A Hammingsen . 1965 . Sa p pressure i n
vascular plants . Scienc e 148:339-346 .
Slatyer, R.O . 1967 . Plant-Wate r Relationships . Academi c Press, Ne w York.
Spanner, D.C . 1973 . Th e component s o f th e wate r potentia l i n plant s an d soils . Journa l o f
Experimental Botan y 24:816-819.
Taylor, S.A . an d G.L . Ashcroft . 1972 . Physica l Edaphology. W.H . Freema n an d Company , San
Francisco.
CONSULTANTS
Keith L . Bristo w Jac
CSIRO Universit
Townsville, Queensland , Australi a Toronto
Gaylon S . Campbell Georg
Washington Stat e University Wate
Pullman, Washington Pretoria
Alfred Cas s Fran
CSIRO Uta
Glen Osmond , Sout h Australia, Australi a Logan
k Dainty
y of Toronto
, Ontario, Canad a
e C. Green
r Researc h Commissio n
, South Afric a
k B . Salisbury
h Stat e University
, Uta h
5
SOLUTIONS
(IONIC RELATIONS)
Jack Dainty 1
Department o f Botany
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1
Canada
Many event s i n plant s involv e movement s o f substance s a s gase s o r a s solutes ,
molecular o r ionic , dissolve d i n liquids , typicall y water . Th e followin g ar e
recommended symbol s and unit s to be use d in discussion of these movements .
1. ABBREVIATIONS USED AS SUBSCRIPTS AND SUPERSCRIPTS
1 subscrip
in, out subscript
i, o a
co, oc externa
cv, vc
w subscrip
P subscrip
V subscrip
s subscrip
p subscrip
r o r m subscrip
cw subscrip
o, i superscrip
averag e concentration ,
Current addres s is: Jac k Dainty , Mas Tourriere, F-34270 , Cazevieille , France .
55
56 Plant
Biophysics
2. THE TABLES
Table 1 . Recommende d Unit s fo r Concentration s a, b ( Svmbol C )
solids in solids
solids in liquid s
mol-m o r k g m (S I units)
mol-L-1 = M = mola r concentration (no t recommended )
mol- kg -3 = m = mola l concentration (no t recommended) ,
kg -L" (acceptabl e whe n no t a pur e substance ; avoi d mg-mL " ,
etc.)
solids in gases c
liquids in liquids
liquids in gases c
gases in gases c
gases in liquids c
gases in solids c
" Thi s table was prepared by F.B. Salisbur y in response to a suggestion o f T.W. Tibbitts .
b
Us e moles for pur e substances ; otherwise , us e kilograms .
c
Whe n volume ( m o r L) is used fo r gases, temperatur e an d pressure mus t be specified .
M.
m
mole fractio n
activity
activity coefficien t
i
Xj(orXj)
j)
a
fjJ
v
mol-m"3
mol-L4
(M = molarity ; discouraged)
mol-kg-1
mol-mol"1 (dimensionless)
Same units as correspondin g
concentration
dimensionless; use d when concentratio n
is expressed in mol-m" 3, mol-L" 1, o r
mol-kg ; defined b y a- = f-C- etc .
dimensionless; define d by : a - = v-X-
Continued
Table 2. Recommended Symbols and Units for Plant Ionic Relations (continued)
Parameter Symbol
Uni
. mo
J-mol
l
"
i
l
/-
*i
r E)
A# (or AEj
V
V
jV
(volt )
. dimensionles
58 Plant
Biophysics
Table 2. Recommended Symbols and Units for Plant Ionic Relations (continued)
Symbol
Parameter
mobility
Unit
either: m^s^-V1
or: m-mol'S^-N"1
A
F
C
f
S
, g: S-
(amp )
(farad )
(coulomb )
l (ohm)
(siemen )
m
- dimensionles
s <
, J mol-m^-s"
jn, <; , J in
out, <0, Joul
oc, 0,,,,, <,, <vc> etc.
Note tha t th e ter m flu x i s used i n transport studie s for amoun t crossing uni t are a pe r
second. Thu s term s suc h a s "rat e o f flux " o r "flu x density " are incorrec t an d shoul d no t
be used .
permeability coefficien t P
diffusion coefficien t D
partition coefficien t K
Michaelis constant
m-s"
irr^-s"
dimensionles
rate constant
A:
m-s"
mav mol-m"
mol-s"
1
1
s
mol-mm-3
(or mol-L" 1, molarity, M,
but shoul d b e avoided )
s"'
m3-mol^-s"1, etc .
1
^"1
1
Continued
Table 2. Recommended Symbols and Units for Plant Ionic Relations (continued)
Parameter
velocity (maximu m o f enzy matically controlle d reaction )
generalized forc e
generalized conductanc e
coefficient
quantity of substance
quantity of isotope
specific activit y
Symbol
Unit
mol-s"1
Vmax
usually J-m^-mol" 1
(or N-mor 1)
mol m"2- s'V'Force"
L
Q
>.
QJ
s
mol
appropriate units;
e.g., th e becquerel , B q (becquerel s ar e
expressed a s s" 1)
appropriate units
e.g., Bq-mol" 1
6
WATER RELATIONS
Jack Dainty
Department o f Botany
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario M55 1A1
Canada
In organism s i n general , bu t particularl y in plants , th e movemen t o f wate r i s of
special importance . It s movemen t b y diffusio n o r bul k flo w follow s th e sam e
thermodynamic principles a s the movemen t of other substances , but it s prevalenc e
in livin g systems has provide d an impetu s for special study and fo r a special se t o f
terms an d measurements . A t present , author s of technical paper s us e one o r th e
other o f th e tw o ways o f expressing the solut e effec t o n th e chemica l potentia l of
water: th e osmotic pressure o r osmotic (solute) potential. Osmotic pressure, which
expresses th e effec t o f solutes as a positive number with dimensions of pressure, i s
the traditiona l approach , but osmotic potential, which considers the solute effect a s
a componen t o f th e wate r potential , expresse s th e effec t a s a negativ e number ,
usually als o wit h dimension s o f pressur e (se e Chapte r 4 on thermodynamics) . I n
spite o f tradition, th e concep t o f potentials seem s most logical fro m th e standpoin t
of thermodynamics, which is the basi s for the universall y accepted concep t o f water
potential. I n th e followin g summar y o f recommended symbols and units , both ap proaches ar e presented , bu t th e us e o f potentials i s strongly encouraged.
1. THE TABLES
The basic recommended terms , symbols, and unit s are summarized in Table 1 . Th e
discussion followin g th e tabl e expand s th e basi c potentia l term s an d give s th e
traditional term s a s well. Tabl e 2 then summarize s the terms , symbols, and unit s
considered i n th e discussion . Tabl e 3 presents othe r term s use d i n discussion s of
plant water relations.
60
Water Relations 6
Table 1. Recommended Terms, Symbols, & Units for Plant Water Relations
Parameter
Symbol
Unit
-1
J.mpl-1
Pa
water potential
Pa (Pascal)
components of water
potential: pressure potential
(= hydrostatic pressure),
solute potential, and matric
potential.
(units J.mol-1) of pure water at atmospheric pressure and at the sam e temperatur e
as th e syste m unde r consideration , an d V w = th e partia l mola r volume o f water
equals (1 8 000 mm3.mor-1).
As discussed i n Chapter 4 on thermodynamics, division of the reference chemica l
potential o f wate r (u w - u w*), which ha s unit s o f energ y ( J mol- 1), b y the partia l
molar volum e o f wate r produce s unit s equivalen t t o thos e o f pressure . Thi s i s
illustrated b y the followin g conversions (se e Tabl e 2 in Chapter I of this book):
J.mol-1 = N . m.mol- 1 = m
2.
kg.s- 2.mol-1
62 Plant
Biophysics
Parameter
water potential
pressure potential (or
pressure)
solute or osmotic potentia l
osmotic pressure
Unit
Symbol
y (usuall y negative, ca n be
positive)
Pa
J-kg 4
Pa
o r P (ca n be + o r - )
J-kg"1
Pa
*,
( V^', always negative)
J-kg"1
Pa
7T
J-kg-1
(S", = ir ;
TT i s always positive)
matric potential
*m
Pa
J-kg"1
Crr;7m = -r>
Tm i s always negative;
T is always positive)
Table 3. Other Terms Used in Discussions of Plant Water Relations.
Parameter
Symbol
volume flux
Jv
solute flux
solute permeability
***,
P, or o>.
Unit
m-s"1
mol-m^-s"1
m-s"1
mol-m^-s'^Pa'1
Continued
Water Relations 6
Uni
Note: u s i s defined b y the equation : flu x = u> sRT&Cs an d is thus given by <a sRT = P s.
hydraulic conductanc e L
m-s"
-Pa'1
Note: Thi s refer s usuall y to th e cel l membran e an d i s ofte n incorrectl y calle d hydraulic
conductivity. I t i s no t normalize d t o uni t thicknes s o f th e barrier . Th e ter m hydrauli c
conductivity is correctly used when, for example, referring to the conductivity to water of the
cell wall material; th e sam e symbo l is usually used, bu t th e unit s are m 2-s"'-Pa"1.
hydraulic resistanc e R
-*'1
Note: Denote s the "speed " a t whic h changes in water potential propagate within tissue s
and incorporate s cel l and wall conductance s to water and thei r storag e capacities .
diffusional permeabilit y fo r P
water
reflection coefficien t a
j m-s'
dimensionles
P
i s defined as V(dPldV)
a
3
non-osmotic volume b
osmotic coefficient c/
> dimensionles
viscosity 7
7 N-s-m"
(often give n as % or m - m )
rn^N^-s"
- m-s"
surface tensio n T
N-m"
64 Plant
Biophysics
CONSULTANTS FO R TH E CHAPTER S B Y JACK DAINTY
Mary A . Bisso n
SUNY - Buffal o
Buffalo, Ne w Yor k
John A Milbur n
The Universit y of New England
Armidale, Australia
Julian Collin s
University o f Liverpool
Liverpool, Englan d
Michael G . Pitman
CSIRO
Dickson, Australia
John Cra m
University o f Newcastl e
Newcastle, Englan d
Ronald J . Pool e
McGill Universit y
Montreal, Quebec , Canad a
Leonora Reinhol d
Hebrew Universit y of Jerusale m
Jerusalem, Israe l
Dieter Jeschk e
Estenfeld, German y
Roger M . Spanswick
Cornell Universit y
Ithaca, New York
Betty L . Kleppe r
USDA-ARS
Pendleton, Orego n
William J. Luca s
University of California
Davis, California
Enid A . C . MacRobbie
Botany Schoo l
Cambridge, Englan d
E. Marr e
Universita' degl i di Milano Studii
Milano, Italy
Ernst Steudl e
Universitat Bayreuth
Bayreuth, German y
Michel Thellie r
Faculte de s Sciences de Roue n
Mont-Saint-Aignan, France
Alan Walke r
University of Sydney
Sydney, Australia
7
ENERGY TRANSFER
Frank B . Salisbury
Plants, Soils , and Biometeorolog y Departmen t
Utah Stat e University
Logan, Uta h 84322-482 0 U.S.A .
Michael J . Savag e
Department o f Agronomy
University o f Natal
Pietermaritzburg 320 1
Republic o f South Afric a
An excellent exampl e of plant biophysics is the applicatio n o f physical principles t o
understand th e energ y exchang e betwee n a plan t an d it s environment . Here , we
present a summar y table o f terms, symbols, and unit s tha t ar e appropriat e fo r thi s
endeavor followe d by some equation s tha t ar e ofte n used.
1. TERMS, SYMBOLS, AND UNITS APPROPRIATE IN ENERGY-TRANSFER
STUDIES
The symbol s i n Table 1 are mostl y arrange d alphabetically , wit h Roman letter s
first, the n Gree k letter s (bu t som e parameter s hav e alternativ e Roma n o r Gree k
symbols).
Table 1. Terms, Symbols, and Units.
Parameter
Symbol
Unit
unitless
absorptance o r absorptivit y
unitless (J-J" 1)
J-kg'1, W-m' 2
bl
conduction, superscrip t
65 Continued
66 Plant
Biophysics
Parameter
volumetric heat capacity
(at constant volume)
specific heat capacity of dry air (at
constant pressure)
Symbol
c
Unit
J-m^'-C1
or J-nr 3 -K 4
J-kg^'-C 1
or J-kg^-K' 1
m2-s4
unitless
Sleaf
nvs"1
hc
W-nr^-C'1
or W-m^-K'1
Planck's constant
hv
W-m' 2
leaf conductance
h
IR (near infrared:
800 to 3000 nm)
(far infrared:
3000 to 70 000 nm)
unitless
K>
W-nr 2 -C 4
orW-m- 2 -K 4
m2-s4
W-m'2, J-kg 4
photosynthetic irradiance
(photosynthetically active radiation)
PAR
W-m- 2
PPF
mol-m'2-s4
(moles of photons per square
meter second)
(usually /imol-m -s )
(also: mol-m^-d' 1 )
Pa
(usually kPa)
Continued
Energy Transfer 6
Symbol
e
l>ea
Unit
Pa
net irradiance
W-rrT2
8.3143 J-mol^-K' 1
8.3143 m 3 -Pa-mor 1 -K- 1
8.3143X1Q-6 m 3 -MPa-mor 1 -K- 1
(1.987 cal-mol^-K4)
(0.083143 L-bar-mol^-K- 1 )
reflection coefficient
unitless
r^ or r(A)
unitless
s-m"1
s-m
r or r
s-m" 1
RH
percent (%)
W-m"2
ta
transpiration, superscript
temperature
K(C)
J-mol" 1
ultraviolet
UV(UV-A 320 to
400 ran)
(UV-B 280 to
320 nm)
(UV-C <280nm)
KorL
J-kg 4 , W-m' 2
m-s" 1
w, wv
x, or 8 (delta)
Continued
68 Plant
Biophysics
Unit
Symbol
Pa-K'1
Typical value is 66.6
Pa-K'1
(at 20C and 100 kPa:
sea level)
psychrometric constant
Y (gamma)
Sbl (delta)
A (delta)
6jR (epsilon)
unitless (J-J" 1 )
H. (lambda)
nm
*max (lambda)
nm
wavelength of radiation
wavelength corresponding to the
maximum absorption coefficient in
an absorption band or to the
maximum photon (or energy)
emission in an emission spectrum
frequency of electromagnetic
radiation
density of dry (unsaturated) air
Stefan-Boltzmann constant
m (usually mm)
v (nu)
s'1, Hz (hertz)
P (rho)
kg-m- 3
a (sigma) or S (delta)
Q + H + V + B + M +A = 0
where
Q=
ne t irradianc e (positiv e i f leaf i s radiating less energy tha n th e radian t
energy absorbed fro m it s surroundings),
H=
sensibl e heat flux transfer (includes conduction and convection; negative
if lea f loses more hea t energ y than it gains),
V=
laten t hea t flux ; th e transpiratio n ter m (negativ e when water i s vaporizing; positive whe n condensing o r freezing) ,
B=
storag e flux (positive whe n leaf temperatur e is increasing),
M=
metabolis m an d othe r factor s (positiv e when heat i s produced), an d
A=
advecte d hea t flu x fro m lea f t o ai r (positiv e for advectio n fro m ai r t o
leaf; advectio n i s the horizonta l flow of airi.e. , wind).
At constan t lea f temperatur e an d ignorin g metabolism an d advectio n (whic h
could b e important but i s difficult t o measure) : Q + H + V = 0.
Energy Transfer 6
where
eQPAR = tota l absorbed irradianc e i n the PAR region (W.m- 2),
and
C. Radiant Energy Flux from a Leaf (or any) Surface (Qe; W.m-2):
Qe = e s T4
where
Qe = Radiant energ y flux (W.m- 2),
e = emissivit y (abou t 0.9 8 fo r leaves a t growin g temperatures) ,
a = Stefan-Boltzman n constan t (5.67 3 x 10- 8 W.m- 2-K-4), and
T = absolut e temperatur e o f the lea f (K )
This Stefan-Boltzmann Law is applied i n th e nex t equation .
D. Net Irradiance at a Leaf Surface (Q; W.m-2):
Energy flux emitted by a leaf (Stefan-Boltzmann law) is subtracted fro m the absorbe d
radiant energ y flux (Qabs) :
Q = Qabs -
eIRsT4
where
Q = energy flux (W.m- 2)
Qabs
eIR = emissivit y or absorptivit y of the lea f fo r long-wave (thermal) radiation; typicall y about 0.9 5 fo r livin g leave s a t norma l temperature s
(same a s e' above) .
Often, th e abov e equatio n i s written (se e Monteit h an d Unsworth, 1990) :
Q = Is - rI, + Lenv - emsT4
where
2
IS = th e sola r irradianc e inciden t a t th e lea f surface (W.m- ),
r = th e lea f surfac e reflectio n coefficien t (decima l fraction) , and
Lenv = th e environmental longwav e irradiance inciden t at th e leaf surfac e
(W.m-2).
E. Sensible Energy Flux Transfer by Convection at a Leaf Surface (H; W.m-2):
70 Plant
Biophysics
where
Ta =
ai r temperature ( K or C) ,
Tl =
lea f temperatur e (K or C) ,
AT = T
a-
Tb
cp =
p=
ra=
ga =
The convective transfer coefficient (h c; W.m-2.K- 1), als o calle d th e heat transfer
coefficient (proportiona l t o the reciprocal of the boundary layer resistance), ma y be
used t o calculat e sensible energy transfer H (W.m- 2):
F. Latent Energy Flux of Water Vapor at a Leaf Surface (V; W.m-2), the
Transpiration Term:
where
et = vapor pressur e i n the leaf ; i.e., withi n the substomata l cavit y (Pa) ,
ea = vapo r pressur e o f the air (Pa) ,
ra = boundary laye r resistanc e (i n air) (s.m- 1),
rl = diffusiv e resistanc e withi n the lea f (s.m- 1),
r=
Energy Transfer 7
REFERENCES
Campbell, Gaylo n S . 1977 . A n Introductio n to Environmenta l Biophysics. Springer-Verlag , New
York, Heidelberg , Berlin . 15 9 p.
Gates, Davi d M . an d L a Verne E . Papian . 1971 . Atla s o f Energ y Budget s o f Plan t Leaves .
Academic Press , Londo n an d Ne w York. 27 9 p.
Gates, Davi d M . 1968 . Transpiration an d lea f temperature. Annua l Review of Plant Physiology
19:211-238.
Larcher, Walter . 1995 . Physiologica l Plant Ecology , Thir d Edition . Springer-Verlag , Berlin ,
Heidelberg, New York. (Translate d b y Joy Wieser) 50 6 p.
Monteith, J.L. and M.H. Unsworth. 1990 . Principle s of Environmental Physics. Edwar d Arnold :
London, 29 1 p.
Nobel, Park S. 1983 . Biophysica l Plant Physiology and Ecology. W.H . Freeman an d Company , San
Francisco. 60 8 p. [Th e symbols and unit s used i n this chapter were modified fro m thos e i n this
text book. ]
Raschke, Klaus . 1960 . Hea t transfe r between th e plan t and th e environment . Annua l Review of
Plant Physiolog y 11:111-126.
CONSULTANTS
Donald T . Krizek
USDA Agricultura l Research Servic e
Beltsville, Maryland
John C . Sager
John F. Kennedy Space Cente r
Kennedy Space Center , Florid a
8
PHLOEM TRANSPORT
Donald R . Geige r
Department o f Biology
University o f Dayto n
Dayton, Ohi o 45469-232 0 U.S.A.
Aart J.E . va n Bel
Botanisches Institu t 1
Justus-Liebig Universita t
Senckenbergstrasse 17
D-35390 Giessen, Germany
In this chapte r term s ar e defined and SI units are presented whe n appropriate .
Table 1. Some Terms and Units Used in the Study of Phloem Transport.
Term
Description of Concept
Units
BASIC AND DESCRIPTIVE TERMS:
photoassimilates Organi c compounds produced b y photosynthetic carbon fixation .
translocation Lon
allocation a Flo
(partitioning) ica
w o f photoassimilates int o various compartments or biochem l pathway s within sourc e an d sin k regions . I n sourc e organs ,
carbon i s allocate d t o variou s use s includin g export . I n a sin k
organ, carbon enter s into compartments or i s used fo r synthesis ,
storage, or energ y metabolism.
partitioning a Distributio
(allocation)
pressure flow Th
hypothesis em
e theor y o f osmotically-drive n pressur e flow withi n th e phlo ; pressur e build s u p i n th e siev e element-companio n cel l
complexes i n th e sourc e a s water move s into these sieve elemen t
members i n respons e t o hig h solut e concentration s therein ;
pressures within the siev e elemen t member s ar e les s i n th e sin k
regions a s solute s exi t fro m th e phloem . Firs t propose d b y E .
Munch i n 1930 .
Continued
Phloem Transport
73
Table 1. Some Terms and Units Used in the Study of Phloem Transport (continued)
Term
Description of Concept
pressure flow A
Units
osmotically Flo
w tha t arise s fro m negativ e osmoti c potentia l withi n siev e
generated flow tube s (phloe m translocation ) o r xyle m vessel s (roo t pressure ,
root exudation , guttation) .
mass flow Flo
sieve-element/ Cellula
companion-cell branche
complex physiologica
apoplast Th
symplast Th
QUANTITATIVE OR
translocation
profile
MEASUREMENT TERMS
A plo t o f solut e concentratio n versu s distance (spatia l profile) or
solute concentratio n a t a particula r locatio n versu s tim e (tem poral profile) .
bidirectional Simultaneou
s transpor t o f solute s i n opposit e direction s i n th e
transport sam
e fil e o f siev e elements . Th e proces s ha s no t bee n demon strated i n th e sens e o f th e definition . Bidirectiona l transpor t
may occu r unde r som e circumstances , fo r example , in a fil e o f
cells as a resul t o f cytoplasmic streaming.
source A
sink A
phloem loading Th
phloem Th
unloading solute
74 Plant
Biophysics
Table 1. Some Terms and Units Used in the Study of Phloem Transport (continued)
Term Descriptio
n o f Concept
Units
FLOW TERMS:
phloem export Rat
rate sourc
mg-s'1
or
mol-s"-1
mg-s"1
or
mol-s"1
translocation Linea
speed (velocity ) siev
m-s-1
MPa-nT1
m'-m-V1
MPa-m 4
volume flo
w Ne
" Unfortunatel y th e tw o terms ar e use d i n opposite ways by different authors. Car e must be take n t o determine which
way a give n autho r chooses to appl y thes e terms .
CONSULTANTS
Susan Dunfor d Coli
University of Cincinnat i Universit
Cincinnati, Ohi o Gle
Walter Eschric h Joh
GOttingen, German y Universit
Donald B . Fishe r
Washington Stat e University Pete
Pullman, Washingto n Th
R.M. Gifford
CSIRO
Canberra, ACT , Australi a Joh
Lim C . Ho Newcastle
Institute o f Horticultur e
Littlehampton, Wes t Sussex , Englan d Fran
n F. Jenner
y of Adelaide
n Osmond , Sout h Australia, Australia
n A. Milburn
y of New England
Armidale, NSW , Australia
r E . H . Minchin
e Horticulture and Foo d Researc h
Institute o f New Zealand Ltd .
Lower Hutt, New Zealand
n W . Patrick
University of Newcastle
, NSW, Australia
k B . Salisbury
Utah Stat e University
Logan, Utah
9
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
Donald T . Krizek
Climate Stres s Laborator y
U.S. Departmen t o f Agriculture, AR S
Beltsville, Marylan d 20705-235 0 U.S.A .
John C . Sager
Biomedical Operation s an d Researc h Offic e (MD-RES )
John F . Kennedy Space Cente r
Kennedy Space Center , Florid a 32899-000 1 U.S.A .
An accurate description of the radiation environment used in controlled-environment
and othe r studie s is fundamental to plan t science. Sinc e formal approva l o f the S I
(Systgme International d'Unites) i n 196 0 b y th e Conference Generate de s Poids e t
Mesures, ther e ha s bee n increasin g interes t amon g plan t scientist s i n tryin g t o
standardize terminology used in describing electromagnetic radiation , which includes
the huma n visuall y evaluate d wavelength s calle d light . Th e quantitie s use d t o
describe and evaluate light (e.g., the candela, lumen, lux), however, are not applicable
to plan t physiology . Th e followin g list o f terms , symbols , and unit s is base d o n
recommendations give n i n th e CI E (Commission Internationale d e I'fcclairage)
International Lightin g Vocabular y publishe d i n 198 7 an d i n othe r reference s
attached.
Table 1. Terms, Symbols, and Units Basic to Studies of Radiation".
Quantity
Symbol
Units
Qe
radiant exposure
He
J-m" 2
W.m-2
e^
number of photons N
(number of quanta)
Avogadro's number
(mole) of photons
W-m~
dimensionles
Q
-nm" 1
s
mol
75 Continued
76 Plant
Biophysics
Symbol
Units
mol-m-2
mol.m-2.s-1
photon exposure H
pho
spectral photon flux c E
. mol-
m -s^-nm"
dimensionles
absorbance A
dimensionles
reflectance (ratio of p
reflected to incident
radiation)
dimensionles
transmittance T
dimensionles
" The term intensity should not be used to describe radiation falling on a surface or a point Intensity (symbol f) refers
to the source', e.g., the sun or a lamp.
The sam e symbo l i s use d fo r th e correspondin g energy (e ) o r photo n (p ) quantit y wit h th e subscrip t use d wher e
confusion migh t occur.
c
Spectral data shoul d b e shown wit h th e abscissa as a wavelength scal e with lo w values t o the left Discret e responses,
such a s actio n o r emissio n spectr a shoul d b e give n i n term s o f photons .
Unit
PHOTOSYNTHESIS:
frequency
&1, Hz
wave number
m'1
wavelength
fluorescence
F
F
initial
maximum
variable
terminal
dimensionless
* max
F
= F
Continued
Electromagnetic Radiation 7
dimensionles
nm
R Specif
photosynthetic irradiance
PI W-m"
photosyntheti
PPF
mol-m-2.s-1
(usually jumol-m"2^"1)
(sometimes mol- m -d" 1)
PHOTOTROPISM: Al l terminology is referenced t o th e basi c definitions and unit s of electro magnetic radiatio n
PHYTOCHROME (phy):
total phytochrome Plot
= Pf r + Pr dimensionles
far-red-absorbing form Pf
r dimensionles
red-absorbing form P
r dimensionles
> dimensionles
A dimensionles
A/1*2 dimensionles
^
" For a detailed description of current phytochrome nomenclature, the reader is referred to Quail et al. (1994)
REFERENCES
ASAE Engineering Practice : ASA E EP285.7. 1988 . Us e o f SI (Metric) Units . America n Societ y
of Agricultural Engineer s (ASAE) , 2950 Nile s Road, St. Joseph, Michiga n 49085-9659.
ASAE Engineering Practice: ASAE EP402. 1990 . Radiatio n quantitie s and units. America n Society
of Agricultural Engineer s (ASAE) , 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, Michiga n 49085-9659.
ASAE Engineering Practice : ASAE EP411.2. 1992 . Guideline s for measuring and reporting environmental parameter s fo r plan t experiment s in growth chambers . America n Societ y o f Agricultural
Engineers (ASAE), 2950 Niles Road St. Joseph, Michigan 49085-9659. (See appendix C.)
American Societ y fo r Horticultura l Science Working Group o n Growt h Chamber s and Controlled
Environments. 1980 . Guideline s for measuring and reportin g the environment for plan t studies.
HortScience 15(6):719-720 .
78 Plant
Biophysics
J. Michae l Robinson
U.S. Departmen t o f Agriculture, ARS
Beltsville, Maryland
Gerald F . Deitzer
University o f Maryland
College Park , Maryland
Walter Shropshire , Jr .
Omega Laborator y
Timonium, Maryland
Elisabeth Gant t
University of Maryland
College Park , Maryland
Ambler Thompso n
U.S. Department o f Commerc e
Gaithersburg, Maryland
III
PLANT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Much of plant physiology and plant science in general is plant biochemistry. Fo r th e
most part , traditiona l plan t biochemistry is the same as general biochemistry , but a
few specia l feature s appea r i n th e table s o f Chapter 10 . Durin g recent years , plant
physiologists have become deeply involved in understanding the biochemistry of plant
genetics, a field tha t i s often calle d molecular biology, the topi c of Chapter 11 .
10
PLANT BIOCHEMISTRY
Clanton C . Black, Jr .
Biochemistry an d Molecula r Biolog y Departmen t
Life Science s Building
University o f Georgi a
Athens, Georgia 3060 2 U.S.A .
The followin g discussio n an d table s hav e bee n extracte d fro m th e Instructions to
Authors, normall y published annuall y in a January issue of Th e Journal o f Biological
Chemistry (use d by permission), modified somewhat to more closely conform with SI
notation an d with special referenc e t o th e plan t sciences .
1. INSTRUCTIONS ON CHEMICAL AND MATHEMATICAL USAGE
A. General. I n preparing a manuscript fo r publication, make references i n th e
text to simple chemical compounds by the use of formulas when these can be printed
in single horizontal lines o f type. D o no t us e two-dimensional formulas in running
text. Cente r chemica l equations , structura l formula , an d mathematica l formula s
between successive lines of text. Prepare such structural formulas and mathematical
equations in a form suitable for direct photographic reproduction and include them
on a duplicate sheet at the end of the paper. Similarly , long sequences o f amin o
acids o r nucleotide s usuall y reproduce bette r an d will be fre e fro m printers ' error s
if they ar e printe d with a laser printer , drawn in ink, or typewritte n by the author .
(Boldfaced print is best.)
B. Ionic Charge should b e designated a s a numbered superscript followin g the
chemical symbol ; e.g., Mg 2+, S 2-. Th e notation Mg(II ) is also acceptable .
C. Optically Active Isomers. Name s o f chira l compound s whos e absolut e
configuration i s known may be differentiated by the prefixe d R - and S- (see IUPA C
(1970) J . Org. Chem. 35, 2849-2867) . Whe n th e compound s ca n b e correlate d
sterically with glyceraldehyde, serine , or another standard accepte d for a specialized
class o f compound, SMAL L CAPITAL LETTERS D-, L-, and D L may be use d for chira l
compounds an d thei r racemates . Wher e the directio n o f optical rotatio n i s all that
can be specified, (+)-, (-)-, and ()- or dextro, laevo, and "optically inactive" are used,
but i n suc h instances the condition s of measurement must be specified .
81
82 Plant
Plant Biochemistry 8
84 Plant
Plant Biochemistry 8
86 Plant
61-76. Not e that the genotypes are italicized (underline d i f italics are not available) ;
phenotypes ar e not . (Se e als o Chapte r 1 1 in this volume.)
Genetic designations fo r various bacteria, bacteriophages, animal viruses, algae,
and other materials ar e listed i n "Genetic Maps " (Editor Stephe n J. O'Brien). Thi s
publication ca n b e purchase d fro m Col d Sprin g Harbo r Laboratory , Fulfillmen t
Department. P.O . Bo x 100 MM, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724. Th e nomenclatur e
of variou s bacteri a i s liste d i n Bergey , Manual o f Determinative Bacteriology, 8t h
Edition, Waverl y Press, Baltimore , M D 21202. Th e nomenclatur e o f transposabl e
elements i n prokaryotes can be found i n A. Campbell et al. (1979) Gene 5, 197-206 ,
or Szybalsk i and Szybalsk i (1979) Gene 7, 217-270 .
3. THE TABLES
Unit/Symbol
Mb, mol.L- 1 (preferred )
mM (rathe r tha n 10- 3 M) ,
mmol.L-1 (preferred )
uM (rathe r than 10- 6 M) ,
[umol.L-1 (preferred )
nM (no t muM) ,
nmol.L-1 (preferred)
pM (no t uu M),
pmol.L-1 (preferred)
Bq
Ci (no t SI )
Da (no t SI )
u
eq (no t SI )
cpm (no t SI , but acceptable )
rpm (no t SI , but acceptable )
Hz
cal (not SI , use J)
kcal (no t SI, use kJ )
S (not SI )
Continued
Plant Biochemistry 8
Unit/Symbol
absorbance A
equilibrium constant K
Michaelis constant K
relative molecular mass M
retardation facto r R
average acceleration of gravity at earth's g
surfaced (us e to repor t centrifugation , etc. )
specific rotatio n [a]
sedimentation coefficien t s
sedimentation coefficien t i n water a t 2 0 C ,
extrapolated t o zero concentration
diffusion coefficien t D
m
r
f
n
t
s20,w
Thennodynamic Termse
Term s such as milligram percent (mg% ) should not be used. Mas s concentrations should be given as g/kg, mass/volume
concentrations as g/L, etc. Th e lite r (preferre d symbo l L) i s accepted fo r us e with th e SI (see Chapte r 1 in thi s book).
Th e letter M is not an abbreviation for mole (mol); it is reserved fo r molar. Us e mM for 10- 3 M and uM for 10- 6 M .
Avoid designatin g concentration s a s umo l pe r mL . Th e designatio n should , i n thi s case , properl y b e m M (i.e. , milli molar). Maintai n consistency in the use of units in situations where they are to be compared (e.g. , d o not juxtapose 10
M and 10-5 M). A s discussed i n Chapter 1 , second-level discussion s o f the SI state that molar and M should be replaced
by ti e mor e readil y understandabl e (t o nonchemists ) mol-L-1 , mmol-L-1 , etc. Thi s i s supported b y physical chemist s
although, a s indicate d i n thi s table , Th e Journal o f Biological Chemistry continue s t o accept th e ter m molar (M).
c
1 becquerel = 1 dps or 60 dpm. 1 Ci = 3.7 x 1010 B q (37 GBq). Becquere l i s the preferred ter m in the International
System o f Units .
d In the SI, the symbol g (note italics) stands for the acceleration caused by gravity at any location (e.g., on the moon
well as earth). Th e subscript n (not italics ) i n the symbol g n indicates that the symbol stands for the average acceleratio n
caused b y gravity at th e earth's surface (9.80665 m s-2); tha t is, gn i s a unit (Se e Chapte r 1.)
e
A (o r CoASH ) Coenzym
Name
e 5' -mono, di-, and triphosphate s
c AMP (adenosin e 3':5'-monophosphate), etc.
e monophosph o /V-acetylneuraminic acid
eA
Continued
88 Plant
RNA
SDS
TEAE-cellulose
TMP, TDP , an d TIPa
Tris
UDP-Gal
UDP-GalNAc
UDP-Glc
UDP-GlcNAc
UDP-GlcUA
UDP-Xyl
UMP, UDP , an d UTPa
a
Acetyl coenzym e A
O-(Carboxymethyl)cellulose
Th e d prefix ma y be use d t o represent the corresponding deoxyribonucleoside phosphates ; e.g., dADP . Th e various
isomers o f adenosin e monophosphat e ma y be written 2'-AMP- , 3'-AMP , o r 5'-AM P (i n cas e o f possibl e ambiguity) .
A simila r procedur e ma y be applied t o other nucleosid e o r deoxyribonucleosid e monophosphates .
Plant Biochemistry 8
Name
Symbol
Name
Ferredoxin
Menaquinone
Plastoquinone
Phosphoric acid residu e
Phylloquinone
Pteroic acid (pteroyl- )
Pteroylglutamic acida
PyridoxylTocopherol
Fd
MK
Q
P- o r - P
K
Pte
PteGlu
PxyT
TQ
Tocopherolquinone
Ubiquinone
Q
CD
Circular dichroism
ORD
Optical rotar y disperson
NMR
Nuclear magneti c resonance
ESR
Electron spi n resonanc e
EPR
Electron paramagneti c resonance
IR spectra
Infrared spectr a
UV
Ultraviolet
Symbol
Ala (A )
BAla
Arg (R )
Asn (N )
Asp (D )
Asx (B )
Gla
Cys (C )
Glu (E )
Gln (Q )
Glx (Z )
Gly (G )
Cys
His (H )
Hey
Hse
Name
Symbol
Homoserine lacton e
Hse>
Hydroxylysine
Hyl
Hydroxyproline
Hyp
Isoleucine
He
(I)Leucine
Leu (L )
Lysine
Lys (K )
Methionine
Met (M )
Ornithine
Orn
Phenylalanine
Phe (F )
Proline
Pro (P )
5-Pyrrolidone-2-carboxylic acid <Gl
u
(pyroglutamic acid; 5-oxoproline )
Serine
Ser (S )
Threonine
Thr (T )
Tryptophan
Trp (W )
Tyrosine
Tyr (Y )
Valine
Val (V )
90 Plant
Table 5. Symbols for Carbohydrates and Organic Acids. Thos e symbol s preceded
by a n asteris k ma y be use d withou t definition . Pyranos e and furanos e forms ar e
designated where necessar y by the suffixe s p an d /.
Carbohydrate
Simple sugars
Arabinose
Fructose
Fucose
Galactose
Glucose
Mannose
Rhamnose
Ribose
Xylose
Derivatives of various sugars
N-Acetylglucosamine
Glucosamine
2-Deoxyglucosea
Glucuronic acid
Reductive Pentos e Phosphate Cycle
6 Phosphogluconi c Acid
Fructose-l,6-bisphosphate
Fructose-6-phosphate
Xylulose-5 -phosphate
Sedoheptulose-7-phosphate
Sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphat e
3-Phosphoglycerate
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
Dihydroxyacetone phosphate
Erythrose-4-phosphate
Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate
Glucose-1,6-bisphosphate
Sialic Acid
Organic Acids of the Tricarboxylic Acid cycle
Oxalacetic Acid
Citric Acid
a-Ketoglutaric Acid , 2-oxoglutorat e
Succinic Acid
Malic Acid
Fumeric Acid
Isocitric Acid
Pyruvic Acid
Phosphoenolpyruvic Acid
Cis-Aconitate
Symbol
Ara
Fru
Fuc
Gal
Glc
Man
Rha
Rib
Xyl
GlcNAc
GlcN
dGlc
GlcA
RPPC
6PGL
Fru-l,6-BP or FBP or F1,6-P 2
Fpu-6-P o r F6 P
Xylu-5-P or X5P
Sedoh-7-P o r S7P
Sedoh-l,7-BP o r S1,7-P 2
3-PGA
GAP
DHAP
E-4 P or Ery-4-P
Fru2,6-Bp o r F2,6-P 2
Glul,6-Bp o r G1,6-P 2
Sia
OAA
CIT
a-KG, 2-O G
SUC
MAL
FUM
ISOCIT
PYR
PEP
cACN
aThe prefix 'd' indicates a 2-deoxysugar. Isomers may be designated similarly with a positional numerial; e.g., 3-aThe prefix '
deoxyglucose; 3-dGlc .
Note: I n case s where the distinction between N-acetyl and O-acety l i s important, NeuNA c or NeuOA c ar e acceptabl e
with definition . Likewise , NeuNGc and NeuOG c ar e acceptabl e fo r th e glycolyl analogs.
Plant Biochemistry 9
Table 6. Symbols for Pyrimidine and Purine Bases. Thes e symbol s shoul d b e
defined excep t thos e marked wit h an asterisk .
Base
Adenine *
'a base' Bas
Cytosine *
Guanine *
Hypoxanthine Hy
6-Mercaptopurine (thiohypoxanthine ) Sh
Orotate Or
'a purine' Pu
'a pyrimidine'
Thymine *
Uracil *
Xanthine *
Symbol
Ad
Cy
Gu
Th
Ur
Xa
e
e
t
a
p
y
o
r
Pyr
y
a
n
Symbol
Three-letter One-letter
* Ad o
BrUrd
* Cy d
* Gu o
* In o
Sno
Nuc
Ord
*r d
Puo
Pyd
*A
B
*C
D or h U
*G
*I
M or M P
N
O
or Qa
*
R
Y
Continued
92 Plant
Nucleoside
Nir
Ribosylnicotinamide
Ribosylthimine
* Th d
Thiouridine
Srd
* dTh d
* Ur d
* Xa o
Thymidine (2'-deoxyribosylthymine )
Undine
Xanthosine
Phosphoric residu e
-P
Sor sU
*d T
*U
*X
p or _ b
Table 8. Symbols for Specific Preparations of Nucleic Acids. Thes e symbols may be
used without definition .
Name
Symbol
Complementary DNA , RN A cDNA
Heterogeneous nuclear RNA hnRN
Messenger RN A mRN
Mitochondrial DNA, RN A mtDNA
Nuclear DNA , RN A nDNA
Ribosomal RN A rRN
Transfer RN A tRN
Chloroplast plasti d or DNA , RN A ctDNA
, cRNA
A
A
, mtRNA
, nRNA
A
A
, pDNA , ctRNA, pRN A
Continued
Plant Biochemistry 9
Systematic Description
[ethylenebis(oxyethylenenitrilo)]tetraacetic aci d
Acceptable abbreviation fo r HEPPS (use HEPP S definition) .
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-l-piperazineethanesulfonic acid
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-l-piperazinepropanesulfonic aci d
4-morpholineethanesulfonic aci d
4-morpholinepropanesulfonic aci d
1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic aci d
3-{[2-hydroxy-l,l-bis(hydroxyraethyl)ethyl]amino}-l-propanesulfonic aci d
N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethyIenediamine
2-{ [2-hydroxy-l ,1 -bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]amino}ethanesulfonic aci d
N-[2-hydroxy-l ,1 -bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine
2-amino-2-hydroxymethylpropane-l,3-diol
Continued
94 Plant
Plant Biochemistry
95
Quinones
Nomenclature o f quinones with isoprenoid sid e chains (1975 ) Eur. J. Biochem. 53 , 15-1 8
Carotenoids
Tentative rule s for the nomenclature of carotenoids (
Revisione (1975
Cyclitols
The nomenclature o f cyclitols. Recommendation s (
(1973)
Folic acid
Nomenclature and symbols for folic aci d and related (
compounds
Corrinoids
Nomenclature o f corrinoids (
1972
1975
1967
1974
) Biochemistry 13 , 1555-1560
Retinoids
Nomenclature o f retinoid s (1983
Tetrapyrroles
The nomenclatur e o f tetrapyrrole s
Tocopherols
Nomenclature o f tocopherols an d related compound s (
(1981)
Miscellaneous (vitamins)
Trivial name s o f miscellaneous compound s o f impor- (
tance i n biochemistry
1982
Vitamin B6
Nomenclature fo r vitamin B6 and related compound s (
1973
Vitamin D
Nomenclature of vitamin D (1981) (
1982
Mos t of these documents have also been publishe d in other journals, e.g., Biochemistry, Biochem. J., Eur. J.
Biochem., Boichim. Biophys. Acta, ARch. Biochem. Biophys.
The secon d edition o f a Compendium of thes e documents is available from Portlan d Press Inc. , Ashgate Publishing
Co., Ol d Pos t Rd. , Brookfield , VT 05036-9704; o r Portlan d Press, Ltd., P.O. Bo x 32, Commerce Way, Colchester
CO2 8HP , Essex , U.K . Th e Pric e is 18.00/U.S. $36.00. Postag e is 2.00/U.S. $2.50 . A 15 % discount is
allowable on order s fo r 1 0 copies or mor e to a single address. Paymen t must accompan y th e order.
b
Th e fina l versio n ma y be foun d i n (1979) Pure Appl Chem. 51, 353-380.
c
Th e fina l versio n may be found i n (1976) Pure Appl Chem. 45 , 11-30.
d
e
Th e definitive rule s for nomenclatur e of steroids may be found i n (1972 ) Pure Appi Chem. 31, 285-322.
Th e definitive rule s ma y be found i n (1975) Pure Appl Chem. 41 , 407-431.
96 Plant
[Anonymous]. 1994 . Instruction s t o authors . Th e Journal of Biological Chemistry 269(1):777785. 199 4 by The America n Societ y fo r Biochemistr y and Molecula r Biology, Inc.
CONSULTANTS
William H . Campbel l Dougla
Michigan Tech . Universit y Universit
Houghton, Michiga n Columbia
s D. Randal l
y of Missouri
, Missouri
y Schmid t
y of Georgi a
, Georgi a
Jack Preis s
Michigan Stat e Universit y
East Lansing , Michigan
11
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY and GENE DESIGNATIONS
Ellen M. Reardon an d Carl A Pric e
Waksman Institut e
Rutgers Universit y
Piscataway, N J 08855-0759
1. TERMINOLOGY
anticodon A
ballistic transformation Th
host.
base, kilobase (b, kb) Adenin e (A) , guanine (G), cytosine (C) , thymine (T), an d
uracil (U) . Base s ar e elements of DNA and RNA Th e lengths of DNA and RN A
sequences are measured i n bases (100 0 b = 1 kb).
branch point Th e poin t i n th e replicatio n o f a nucleotide chai n wher e ne w
nucleotides are added .
cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV ) A
centromere Regio
attaches.
97
98 Plant
chromosome A
self-replicatin g modul e o f a genome consistin g o f DN A an d
proteins. Note : nuclea r chromosome s ar e physicall y very differen t fro m chromo somes o f organelles and prokaryotes. Vira l chromosomes ma y be of DNA or RNA .
circular A pofynucleotide chain , usuall y of DNA, in the for m o f a circle; 3 ' - and
5' -end s ma y be hydroge n bonde d o r joined covalentl y (see closed circular).
cis Locate
closed circular A
coding sequence A
codon A ihree-nucleotide segment o f RNA specifyin g a n amin o aci d o r transla tional stop signal .
colony A
expressed sequenc e ta g (EST ) cDNA s for protein gene s that are expressed unde r
selected conditions . ES T ofte n refer s t o a partia l sequenc e o f th e cDN A use d t o
identify site s i n the genom e tha t encode a specific gen e product.
expression, gen e expressio n Th e accumulatio n of specific gen e product s usually
under define d environmenta l conditions .
gel A semi-soli d mediu m int o whic h protein s o r nuclei c acid s ar e subjecte d t o
electrophoresis, to determin e thei r size or to separate them from othe r components .
gene Althoug h i t i s impossibl e t o "define " a gen e t o th e mutua l satisfaction of
biochemists, molecula r biologists , and geneticists, in this context a concise meanin g
might b e th e sequenc e of DNA tha t encodes a gene product (an RN A o r protein) ,
including al l upstream an d downstream sequences involve d in th e expression o f th e
gene.
gene famil y A se t o f gene s whos e sequence s diffe r onl y slightl y tha t encod e
identical products ; within a single species, a multigene family.
gene taggin g Th e additio n o f a marker t o a gene; often b y the introductio n o f a
transposon o r insertio n element .
gene transfer Transformation;
th e insertion of foreign DN A into a host conferring
a trai t no t previousl y inherant i n that organism.
genome Su
virus.
100 Plant
hydropathy plot A
macromolecule.
immunodetection Th
missense DNA Geneti c error resulting in a gene product with the wrong sequence.
morgan (M ) A uni t tha t expresse s th e relativ e distanc e betwee n gene s o n a
chromosome; one M equals a crossover value of 100 %; 1 centimorgan is equivalent
to 2 0 to 2,00 0 k b in higher plants. Name d in honor o f Thomas Hun t Morgan .
multigene family A set o f genes within a species tha t encode simila r or identica l
products.
mutation An y change i n the sequenc e o f DNA in a genome.
nonsense DNA Geneti c error tha t result s i n premature termination of transcription int o RNA .
northern blot Th e hybridizatio n on a membrane of a specific radiolabele d probe
with RNA transferre d from a n electrophoretic separation . Note : northern blot is not
capitalized; see Southern blot.
nucleoid Regio
concentrated.
e portio n o f the cell , often membrane bound, that contain s the chro -
102 Plant
e three-dimensiona l organization of
receptor Recipien t o f a signal, such as a hormone , protein, light, etc., tha t binds
to a specific site an d initiate s a reaction. Se e signal transduction.
l o f gene expression.
n of a genome
second messenger A small molecule within a cell that relays a chemical messag e
from outsid e the cell , a s cyclic AMP.
selectable marker A trait whose presence or absence enables one to grow colonies
or organisms with or without a specific essential component; e.g., antibiotic-resistan t
mutants in the presence o f that antibiotic, or in the absence of an otherwise essential
nutrient.
selection Identificatio
PCR tech -
104 Plant
split gene A
T-region of Ti plasmid Th
genome.
telomere Sequence
replication.
transcript A
transcription Generatio
transduction Introductio
transformation Th
of a n organism .
transon Exons encode d separatel y fro m on e another , with other gene s betwee n
them o r on opposite strands.
transposition Th
upstream Dista
downstream.
vector Plasmid;
Any discussion o f gene nomenclature mus t be prefixed with the subject to which th e
terminology i s to be applied: specifically , the traditiona l genes of genetics and plant
breeding, contraste d wit h genes tha t hav e been clone d an d sequenced .
A. Nomenclatures of traditional genetics. A specifi c locus o n a chromosom e
that i s associate d wit h a uniqu e phenotyp e wil l be referre d t o her e a s a geneti c
system base d on segregational analysis. Segregationa l nomenclature s fo r individua l
plant specie s ar e distinct , an d ther e i s n o systemati c effor t t o assig n commo n
designations t o simila r gene s i n multipl e plants. Mutant s with similar phenotypes
may have no similarit y at th e molecula r level; they can only be distinguished on th e
basis of their loci on chromosomes. Thre e maize mutants with shortened internodes ,
for example , migh t b e calle d dwarf1 , dwarf2 , an d dwarf3 . Year s late r i t migh t b e
discovered tha t dwarfl i s due t o a lesion i n the biosynthesi s of giberellin, dwarf2 t o
a defec t i n a recepto r fo r gibberellin , an d dwarf 3 du e t o som e totall y unrelate d
process. A dwarf mutant in arabidopsis might be due to the same lesion in giberellin
biosynthesis, bu t geneticist s ca n not affor d t o wait until the biochemical functio n of
the gene product has been determined before designations ar e assigned t o the genes.
B. Nomenclature of sequenced plant genes. Th e Commissio n on Plan t Gen e
Nomenclature (CPGN) was founded i n 1991 under the auspices of the International
Society for Plant Molecular Biology. Th e goal of the CPGN is to unify nomenclature
across th e plan t kingdom : a gen e encodin g nitrat e reductas e i n tomat o o r i n
arabidopsis or i n pe a would have the same name. Th e establishmen t of plant-wide
106 Plant
letter, such a s rbcL or cox2. Thus , th e gen e encoding the smal l subunit of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylas e i s RbcS i n higher plant s but rbcS i n chromophytic algae.
The fou r field s denotin g a gen e shoul d b e state d explicity . A n abbreviate d
format ca n als o b e use d provide d i t i s defined i n advance. Th e thir d membe r o f a
multigene famil y in A. thaliana, encoding th e light-harvesting complex type I LHCII,
for exampl e (cf . Fig. 1) , could b e represente d a s Lhcb1;At;3 .
F. Public Databases of Plant Genes. Detaile d informatio n o n gene s i n a
number o f plan t specie s ar e availabl e throug h a maste r database , PGD, whic h i s
maintained b y th e Nationa l Agricultura l Librar y o f th e USDA . Th e specie s
represented i n PGD includ e A. thaliana, maize and other grains , an d soybean, an d
are bein g incremente d o n a n almos t dail y basis . PG D als o contain s th e CPG N
listings o f sequenced plan t genes . Th e electroni c addres s o f PGD is:
http://probe.naiusda.gov:8300.html
Fig. 1. Designations for plant-wide gene families. Th e CPG N classifies sequenced plan t genes into
families based primarily on the functio n o f the gene product . I n this example of the light-harvesting
complex typ e I LHCII, every gen e i n the plan t kingdom encoding this protei n i s a membe r o f thi s
gene famil y an d bear s th e gen e symbo l Lhcbl. Th e ISPMB number i s a consecutivel y applie d
identification numbe r use d i n the management o f the CPG N databases. Gene product numbers ar e
part o f a numerical system being developed b y the CPG N for the classification o f related familie s of
genes analogous t o Enzyme Commission numbers. Specifi c gene s in individual species of plants ar e
identified b y a name or mnemonic o f their plant-wide gene family, the genus and species of the plant,
and member numbers, representative o f thei r occurrence in multigen e families .
108 Plant
CPGN. 1994 . Nomenclatur e o f Sequenced Plan t Genes . Plan t Mol. Biol . Reptr . 1 2 Supplement:
S1-S109.
Hallick, R.B. 1989 . Proposal s for the naming of chloroplast genes. II . Updat e to the nomenclature
of gene s fo r thylakoi d membran e polypeptides . Plan t Mol. Biol. Reptr. 7:266-275 .
Hallick, R.B., an d W . Bottomley. 1983 . Proposal s for the namin g of chloroplast genes . Plan t Mol.
Biol. Reptr . 1:38-43 .
Jansson, S. , E. Pichersky , R. Bassi , B.R . Green , M. Ikeuchi, A. Melis , D.J. Simpson , M . Spangfort,
L.A. Staehelin , an d J.P . Thornber . 1992 . A nomenclatur e fo r th e gene s encodin g th e
chlorophyll a/b-bindin g protein s o f higher plants. Plan t Mol. Biol. Reptr . 10:242-253.
Lonsdale, D.M. an d C.J . Leaver. 1988 . Mitochondria l gene nomenclature. Plan t Mol. Biol. Reptr .
6(2):14-21.
We ar e indebte d t o th e authoritie s wh o compris e ou r mor e tha n sixt y working group s fo r th e
development o f CPGN's commo n nomenclatur e for sequenced plan t genes. Withou t their expertis e
and continuing input, we would b e unable to make databases o f approved designation s for sequence d
plant gene s availabl e to th e scientifi c public, and without charge.
c La m
k Colleg e
s University
w Brunswick, New Jerse y
e Vogel
. D u Pont d e Nemours & Co., Inc.
l Station
Wilmington, Delawar e
IV
PLANT GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
The physica l an d chemica l processe s i n plant s tha t for m th e basi s fo r th e units ,
symbols, an d term s presente d i n th e previou s section s al l tak e plac e i n th e highly
complex machiner y tha t w e recogniz e a s a livin g organism: th e roots , stems , an d
leaves wit h their xyle m an d phloem, parenchym a and pith, and all the othe r tissue s
made up of cells that in turn are highly complex machines with their cytosol, nucleus,
and sundry organelles. Thos e physical and chemica l functions are targets fo r much
study i n plan t physiology , bu t th e trul y astoundin g thin g abou t livin g organism s
including plants i s that the y are sel f generating. Al l that machiner y comes fro m a
single cell , the zygote . Discoverin g ho w this happens i s the goa l o f studies i n th e
subfields o f plant growt h and development. Thi s section attempt s to assembl e th e
terms, symbols, and unit s of measurement used by researchers i n those fields.
Most growt h an d developmen t i s influenced , sometimes strongly , b y changin g
environmental factors . Thi s is obvious in the case of the tropisms and the induction
of reproductiv e growth , but i t ma y be a little les s obvious in some other case s such
as responses to salinity or chilling stress .
This section s begin s wit h terms an d unit s that describ e th e change s i n siz e an d
complexity tha t w e recogniz e a s growt h an d development , continue s wit h plan t
movements an d reproduction , an d the n present s a larg e chapte r wit h subsection s
based o n plan t response s to various stress factors.
12
MORPHOGENESIS AND THE KINETICS OF PLANT GROWTH
Ralph O . Erickson1
Department o f Biolog y
University of Pennsylvani a
Philadelphia, Pennsylvani a 1910 4 U.S.A .
This chapte r deal s wit h terms used i n studying the kinetic s of growth. A few terms
are defined within other definitions; these are also printed in boldfaced type. Word s
in italics ar e themselve s define d elsewhere ; italic s ar e als o use d fo r symbol s tha t
represent physica l quantities (a s in the res t o f this book) .
1. THE BIOMETRY OF GROWTH.
absolute growth rate Rat e o f chang e o f x (size ) wit h respec t t o t (time) , dt/dt ;
dimensions o f x t- 1 (e.g. , m m d- 1). Whe n th e rat e i s approximately constant fo r a
period o f time, growth i s then terme d linear.
allometry Simpl e allometr y obtain s when the relativ e growt h rates o f two measured attribute s o f a n orga n o r organism , y an d x, ar e i n a constan t proportion .
Formulated a s y = ax k, log y = log a + klogx, wher e a i s a constan t an d k i s th e
allometric coefficient; dimensionless.
anisotropic Havin
a symmetrica l sigmoi d
is linea r an d ca n b e use d t o
112 Plant
dimension, t-1.
relative growth rat e Rat e of change relative t o x with respect t o time and proporMay b e symbolize d r; dimension , t- 1. Whe n r i s
tional t o
approximately constan t to r a period o f time, growth is then terme d exponential .
Richards growth functio n (o r curve ) x
= a(l be-kt)1/(1-m; take s a variety of
asymmetrical sigmoi d forms . Th e transformation , I n ((x)1-m + 1) = In b - kt , i s
a
114 Plant
R.F. Lyndo n
University of Edinburg h
Edinburgh, Unite d Kingdo m
P.W. Ganda r
Plant Physiolog y Division , DSI R
Palmerston North , Ne w Zealan d
T. Sach s
The Hebre w Universit y of Jerusale m
Jerusalem, Israe l
Paul B . Gree n
Stanford Universit y
Stanford, Californi a
Frank B . Salisbury
Utah Stat e University
Logan, Uta h
Zygmunt Hejnowic z
Silesian Universit y
Katowice, Polan d
Aristid Lindenmaye r
University of Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherland s
(deceased 1989 )
R.F. Williams
Australian Nationa l University
Canberra City , Australia
13
GROWTH ANALYSIS AND YIELD COMPONENTS
Bruce G. Bugbe e
Plants, Soils and Biometeorolog y Departmen t
Utah Stat e Universit y
Logan, Uta h 84322-482 0
1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
116 Plant
m2.kg-1 (m
2.
m kg- (m
kg.kg-1 (k
kg.m-2
harvest index
nutrient concentration in
plant tissue
(N, P, K, etc.)
Typical
Value
g-kg-'-d- 1
10 to 400
decrease
g-m^-d-1
1 to 30
decrease
m2-kg-1
10 to 60
decrease
m^kg-1
5 to 30
decrease
kg-kg'1
0.4 to 0.8
decrease
g-m^-d'1
1 to 40
rapid increase
then gradual
decrease
/Mnol-m^-s"1 c
1 to 40
decrease
Parameter
relative growth rate or
specific growth rate (RGR)
-2
leaf ground
0.01 to 10
large increase
(sigmoid curve)
" Th e uni t g- g d i s a commonly used unit for RGR, but it is not recommende d because the unit of
grams is not a base uni t an d shoul d no t b e used i n th e denominator. Th e uni t ( d ) is also used fo r RGR be cause the gram s cancel ou t Thi s is confusing, however , because RGR represent s g new growth per g of existing
biomass.
Leaf weigh t ratio is th e commonl y use d ter m bu t k g is a unit o f mass , s o weight i s incorrect
c
Us e moles for pur e substances , suc h a s (imo l o f CC^; us e kilograms or grams for mixed substances , such as
grams o f biomass (ne t assimilation rat e o r cro p growth rate , g-m - d ) .
Table 3. Growt h analysis quantities derived from plan t mass and leaf area
Symbol
Instantaneous
Value
AGR
dm/dt
XGR
\im - dm/dt
LAR
Individual Plant
Derived Quantity
u!
Dimensions
Units
m -t' 1
kg-d' 1
m-m"' -r'
kg-kg-'-d' 1
LA/m
[(LAI/m, ) + (L^/m^/2 =
A -m-'
m2-kg
SLA
LA/Ln
[(.Lu/L^ + duOL^W
A -m' 1
m2-kg
1MR
LJm
[(Z,n/m;) + (Z.^/m,)]/2
m -m'1
kg - k g1
SIM
L./LA
\(Lml/LAI) + (L
m-A-'
kg m' 2
NAR
( 1 I LA ) - dm/dt
m-A-' -f
PDM
(mD/mF) 10 0
CGR
1/GA dm/dt
LAI
LA/GA
SLA -LMR
M/La)V2
kg m'2 d' 1
[(mDI/mn) + (m D2/mr2)}/2
% = 0.01
m-A-' T '
kg m-2 d' 1
(LAI+LM)/2-l/GA
A -A' 1
m2 m- 2
LA = Leaf Area, L m - Lea f mass, G A = Ground Area , / = time, A = Area, m = mass = Weight, m DORf = Dry or Fresh mass. Not e tha t m = meter, but m = mass (became roman typ e
is used for units but italic type i s used for physical quantities ; see Chapter 1) .
a
b
REFERENCES
Causton, Davi d and Jil l Venus . 1981 . Th e Biometr y o f Plant Growth . Edwar d Arnold , London .
Hunt, R . 1978 . Plan t Growt h Analysis . Edwar d Arnold , London .
Hunt, R. 1982 . Plan t Growt h Curves : Th e Functional Approach t o Plant Growth Analysis . Univ .
Park Press. Baltimore .
Hunt, R. 1990 . Basi c Growth Analysis . Unwi n Hyman Ltd., London , UK ; and Winchester, MA.
CONSULTANTS
Ray Wheele r Charle
NASA Kenned y Space Cente r Agricultur
Florida Kentville
Carl Rosen
University of Minnesot a
St. Paul, Minnesot a
s F. Forne y
e Canada
, Nova Scotia, Canad a
14
PLANT MOVEMENT S
Wolfgang Haup t
120
Plant Movements 12
122 Plant
Plant Movements 12
124 Plant
Growth an d Development
thermo- Induction
temperature.
rheo- Induction
aero- Induction
traumato- Induction
Plant Movements 12
they are occasionall y use d i n a purely descriptive way when the controlling facto r is
not known .
nutation Autonomous growth movement ove r extende d periods , i.e. , curvatur e of
organs (o r chang e o f curvature) , cause d b y differential flan k growth , which is no t
induced b y an externa l stimulus. (Th e ter m should not b e used to denote nastic or
tropistic movements, which are induced movements. )
epinasty Growt h curvature in a morphologically downward sense, caused by faster
growth rat e o f the uppe r sid e (e.g. , adaxial side o f leaves).
hyponasty Growt h curvature in a morphologically upward sense, cause d by faster
growth o f the lowe r sid e (e.g. , abaxial side of leaves) .
nyctinasty A diurnal periodic upwar d and downward movement, usually of leave s
or petioles , mainl y controlled b y the physiologica l cloc k but , in addition , synchro nized by an external factor. Sometime s not restricted to autonomous movements, but
used als o fo r movement s tha t ar e induced b y rhythmic light-dark changes , o r onl y
those that ar e induce d b y light-dark transition in the sens e o f scotonasty.
circumnutation(formerly: cyclonasty) Periodi c change of growth curvature, the ti p
of the orga n ideall y moving around a circle or cone; movemen t occurs as the regio n
of highes t growt h rat e rotate s aroun d th e organ . Circumnutatio n i s no t alway s
autonomous but ca n be the result of tropistic stimulation s with extended after-effects .
autotropism A tendency of an organ to grow straight and to straighten a curvature
induced b y a tropistic stimulus.
CONSULTANTS
Donat-Peter Hade r Andrea
Universitat Erlangen-Nurnber g Universita
Erlangen, German y Bonn
Anders Johnsso n Hemmin
University o f Trondheim Universit
Dragvoll, Norwa y Goteborg
Francesco Lend Masamits
C.N.R., Istitut o d i Bioflsica Toky
Pisa, Ital y Tokyo
s Siever s
t Bonn
, German y
g I. Virgin
y of Goteborg
, Swede n
u Wada
o Metropolita n Universit y
, Japa n
d Wagner
t Giesse n
, German y
d H. Weisensee l
t Karlsruh e
, German y
Peter Schopfe r
Universitat Freibur g
Freiburg, German y
15
GROWTH SUBSTANCES
Robert E . Clelan d
Department o f Botany
University of Washington
Box 355325
Seattle, WA 98195-532 5 U.S.A.
Terms use d t o describe plant growth substances have been used in widely divergent
ways. A s a result, there has been little attempt to standardize the definitions. Th e
definitions presented here are based, as far as possible, on the most common usage
at present. Som e terms, such as abscisic acid and ethylene, are not defined here, as
they refer to a single compound .
A few terms ar e define d within other definitions ; these ar e printe d i n boldfaced
type. Word s in italics are themselve s define d elsewhere.
antiauxin A compoun d tha t antagonize s th e biologica l actio n o f a n auxin, and
whose inhibition kinetics are strictly competitive. Fo r example, p-chlorophenoxyisobutyric acid is an antiauxin because it shows competitive inhibitor kinetics, but 2,3 ,
5-triiodobenzoic aci d (TIBA ) an d naphthylphthalami c aci d (NPA) , whic h ar e
inhibitors of polar auxi n transport and show non-competitive inhibitor kinetics, ar e
not antiauxins.
auxin A compound that has a spectrum of biological activities similar to, but no t
necessarily identical with those of indoleacetic acid. Thi s includes the ability to: (1 )
induce cell elongation in isolated coleoptile or stem sections, (2 ) induce cell division
in callus tissues in the presence o f a cytokinin, (3) promote lateral root formation at
the cu t surfac e o f stems , (4 ) induc e parthenocarpi c tomat o frui t growth , an d (5 )
induce ethylene formation.
auxin antagonist A compound that antagonizes the biological action of an auxin.
The inhibitio n kinetic s ca n be eithe r competitiv e o r non-competitive . TIB A an d
NPA can be auxin antagonists, even though they are not antiauxins.
bound auxin A molecule i n which an auxin i s bound to another compoun d (e.g.,
sugar, amin o acid , o r macromolecule ) vi a a covalen t bond . Sometime s calle d a
conjugated auxin.
126
Growth Substances 12
128 Plant
CONSULTANTS
Robert Bandurski
Michigan Stat e University
East Lansing , Michigan
Richard P . Pharis
University o f Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canad a
Peter J. Davie s
Cornell Universit y
Ithaca, Ne w Yor k
Bernard O . Phinney
University o f California
Los Angeles, California
Michael L . Evan s
Ohio Stat e Universit y
Columbus, Ohi o
Frank B . Salisbury
Utah Stat e Universit y
Logan, Uta h
Richard D . Fir n
University o f Yor k
York, Unite d Kingdo m
Andreas Siever s
University o f Bonn
Bonn, German y
Arthur W . Galsto n
Yale Universit y
New Haven, Connecticu t
Lincoln Tai z
University o f California
Santa Cruz , Californi a
Russell L . Jones
University o f California
Berkeley, California
Kenneth Thimann
The Quadrangle
Haverford, Pennsylvania
A. Car l Leopold
Cornell Universit y
Ithaca, Ne w York
Anthony J. Trewava s
University o f Edinburgh
Edinburgh, Scotland
Hans Moh r
Universitat Freibur g
Freiburg, German y
16
BIOLOGICAL TIMING
Willard L . Koukkari
Department o f Plant Biology , University of Minnesota
St. Paul, Minnesota 5510 8 U.S.A .
Beatrice M . Sweeney 1
Department o f Biological Sciences , University of California
Santa Barbara , Californi a 9310 6 U.S. A
This chapter deal s with terms used in the study of biological timing. A few terms are
defined withi n other definitions; these are also printed in boldfaced type. Word s in
italics are themselve s define d elsewhere .
acrophase La g o f th e maximu m (peak) o f a mathematica l curve (e.g. , cosine )
versus a reference ; th e phase angle o f the cres t o f the fitte d mode l in relatio n t o a
reference tim e point .
aliasing Misrepresentatio n o f a frequency to b e lowe r (o r perio d t o b e longer )
because intervals between consecutivel y spaced samples were too long . (Sometime s
called folding effect.)
amplitude Paramete r o f a rhythm , which fo r a mathematica l (e.g. , sinusoidal )
curve, is half the range from th e peak to the trough. I t is sometimes (e.g., by certain
astronomers an d biologists ) use d for the entir e rang e from pea k to trough.
annual Yearly
1Deceased.
129
130 Plant
Biological Timing 13
dark break Interruptio
DD Abbreviatio
n fo r continuous darkness .
e endogenous rhythm.
132 Plant
e biological clock.
e endogenous rhythm.
Biological Timing 13
e synchronizer.
CONSULTANTS
Ruth Satte r (deceased ) Bernar
University o f Connecticu t Universite
Storrs, Connecticu t Besango
Germaine Cornelisse n Guillaum e Fran
University o f Minnesota Uta
Minneapolis, Minnesot a Logan
Ola M . Heide Theres
Agricultural Universit y o f Norway Universit
AS-NLH, Norwa y Bruxelles
d Millet
d e Franche-Comt e
n Cedex , Franc e
k B . Salisbury
h Stat e Universit y
, Uta h
e Vanden Driessch e
e Libr e d e Bruxelle s
, Belgium
17
DORMANCY, PHOTOPERIODISM, AND VERNALIZATION
Frank B . Salisbury
Department o f Plants, Soils , an d Biometeorolog y
Utah Stat e Universit y
Logan, U T 84322-482 0 U.S.A .
This chapter deals with terms used in the study of vernalization, photoperiodism, an d
dormancy. A few terms ar e defined within other definitions ; thes e ar e also printe d
in boldfaced type. Word s in italics are themselves defined elsewhere althoug h italic s
may also be use d fo r scientific names .
abortion Arres t o f developmen t o f a structure . I n som e species , especiall y i n
bulbous plants , the terms flower abscission and blasting are frequently used for flower
abortion. Abscission is the abortion o f a structure that shrivels, dries up, and rapidly
sheds; blastin g i s the abortion o f a structure tha t shrivels, dries up, but usuall y does
not shed . I n certain studies , especially with roses, blindnes s i s used for early abortion o f the flower .
absolute response Se e qualitative response.
after-ripening Use d b y some author s with reference to an y change tha t goe s o n
within a dormant see d o r bud during the breaking of dormancy. Othe r authors have
used the term in a more restricted sense , limiting it to maturation changes that occur
in th e embry o durin g storage. Th e firs t us e is preferable .
allelopathic substances Organi c chemicals that are produced by one plant and that
harm anothe r plant , sometimes by inhibiting germination.
ambiphotoperiodic plants Plant s tha t respon d (e.g. , flower ) onl y whe n give n
photoperiods tha t ar e shorte r tha n som e daylengt h o r longe r tha n som e longe r
daylength (e.g. , shorte r tha n 1 4 h or longe r than 1 8 h); opposite t o intermediate-day
plants. Thi s respons e i s rare, but i t was reported i n Madia elegans (Lewi s and Went ,
1945) an d i n Setaria verticiltata (Matho n an d Stroun , 1960) .
annual A plant wit h a life cycl e fro m see d t o see d tha t is completed i n only one
growing season (o r on e year).
anthesin Se e florigen , whic h Chailakhya n (1968 ) suggest s i s a combinatio n o f
gibberellin an d anthesin .
134
Biological Timing 13
anthesis Th e tim e o f coming into ful l bloo m (e.g. , i n grasses, th e tim e when th e
anthers ar e extende d fro m th e flowe r an d pollen i s released) .
antiflorigen A
autonomously-inductive plant (self-inductive) Flowerin g occurs more-or-less independently of day length (a s in day-neutral plants) and more-or-less independentl y of
any othe r specia l environmenta l treatment . Tha t is , the respons e occur s unde r a
variety of constant environmental conditions .
axillary meristem Meristems i n the angle (axil) formed by the leaf petiole and th e
stem; potentiall y capabl e of forming a branch.
biennial A plan t tha t live s two growing seasons an d flowers and die s durin g the
second season . Typically , biennial s gro w vegetatively during the firs t season , ar e
induced t o flower by the lo w winter temperatur e experience d betwee n th e seasons ,
and flowe r an d di e th e secon d season ; tha t is , they hav e a n absolut e vernalization
requirement. Ofte n thei r flowerin g i s als o promote d b y o r require s lon g days .
(Many wild biennials ma y sometimes be to o smal l after th e firs t seaso n t o becom e
vernalized, i n which case the y might live for mor e than two seasons, althoug h they
flower only once before dying.)
bolting Rapi d elongatio n o f a flowering stem fro m a vegetative rosette, often i n
response t o vernalization o r lon g days.
caulescent plant A
to a rosette plant.
136 Plant
determinate Wit h reference t o an organ such as a leaf, flower, or fruit tha t grows
to a certain size and then stops growing; stems and roots, because the y are produce d
by apical meristems, may continue t o gro w indefinitely, and are thu s indeterminate.
developmental arrest A limitatio n o n see d developmen t tha t prevent s a viabl e
embryo from germinatin g during growth of the seed. (Th e term could be applied t o
other structures a s well.)
devernalization Reversa l of the promotion of flowering induced by exposure to low
temperatures (i.e. , by vernalization) b y an immediate exposure to hig h temperature s
(e.g., 30 C). I f a period o f time elapses a t neutral temperatures between vernalization an d th e high-temperatur e treatment , devernalizatio n usuall y fails. (I n som e
perennial plants, Chrysanthemum, fo r example, prolonged exposure to low irradiance
or shor t days also reverse s th e effect s o f vernalization. )
donor I n graftin g experiments , th e graf t partne r tha t i s assumed t o provid e th e
stimulus (promotiv e o r inhibitory ) to th e receptor.
dormancy Th e condition o f a seed or other plant organ when it fails to germinat e
or gro w because i t ha s not bee n provide d with some special set of conditions (e.g. ,
a perio d o f lo w temperature , suitabl e wavelength s o f light , a treatmen t tha t wil l
scarify th e seedcoa t o r leac h ou t inhibitors ) althoug h i t ha s bee n provide d wit h
moisture, oxygen , and temperature conditions that are suitable for germination and
growth after th e specia l requirements have been met. On e special condition can be
sufficient tim e for the embry o to mature.
Dormancy a s define d her e ha s bee n calle d endogenous o r innate dormancy or
endodormancy (Lang et al., 1986) a s contrasted to imposed dormancy, which prevails
if a n essentia l facto r (e.g. , H 2O o r O 2) i s lacking . Impose d dormanc y i s calle d
quiescence here. Seed-coat-imposed dormancy and embryo dormancy have also bee n
distinguished.
Pomologists hav e use d rest i n th e sens e o f dormancy a s define d her e (Samish ,
1954). Becaus e this use is rather specialized , it would be well to avoid the term rest.
evocation Earl y responses o f receptor tissu e following environmental triggering or
other form o f induction; usually related t o the flowering responses tha t occur at th e
shoot ape x afte r arriva l of flower stimuli and prio r t o flower differentiation (floral
initiation); defined by Evans (1969) to distinguish from induction, which occurs in the
leaf.
facultative response Se
e quantitative response.
138 Plant
140 Plant
short-day plant (SDP) A plant that flowers or otherwise respond s when the days
are shorter than some maximu m length (dependin g on the species) and/o r when the
nights are longe r tha n some minimum length; opposite t o long-day plant.
short-long-day plant (SLDP) A plant tha t respond s photoperiodically (flowerin g
is usually the response ) to a sequence o f short day s followed by long days.
stock Th
grafted.
stratification Se
e prechilling.
REFERENCES
Chailakhyan, Mikhai l Kb . 1968 . Interna l factor s o f plan t flowering . Annua l Review s o f Plan t
Physiology 19:1-36 .
Evans, Lloy d T . 1969 . Th e natur e o f flower induction . In : L.T . Evans , editor . Th e Inductio n of
Flowering, Th e Macmilla n Company o f Australia, Sout h Melbourne , p 457-480.
Lang, Greg , Rebecca Darnell, Jack Early, and George Martin. 1986 . Repl y to letter. HortScienc e
21(2):186.
Lewis, Harla n an d Frits W. Went. 1945 . Plan t growth under controlled conditions . IV . Respons e
of Californi a annuals t o photoperio d an d temperature . Amer . J . Bot . 32:1-12.
Mathon an d Stroun . 1960 . Thir d Internationa l Congres s o f Photobiology, Elsevier , Copenhagen .
p 384-386.
Samish, R.M . 1954 . Dormanc y i n woody plants . Ann . Rev . o f Plan t Physiol . 5:183-204 .
CONSULTANTS
These terms with preliminary definitions were published in the Flowering Newsletter, which was edited
and issue d b y Abraham H . Halev y (no w b y Georges Bernier) . Th e followin g scientists responde d
with comment s tha t strongl y influenced the fina l definitio n o f terms as presented here .
Suresh C . Bhargav a
Indian Agricultural Research Institut e
New Delhi, Indi a
Moshe Negbi
The Hebre w Universit y of Jerusale m
Rehovot, Israe l
Georges Bernie r
University o f Lieg e
Liege, Belgiu m
E. H. Robert s
University o f Readin g
Reading, Englan d
Charles F . Clelan d
U.S. Dept . of Agriculture
Washington, D.C .
Kenneth C . Sanderso n
Auburn University,
Auburn, Alabam a
Abraham H . Halev y
The Hebre w Universit y o f Jerusale m
Rehovot, Israe l
Max Saure
Diplom-Agraringenieur
DorfstraBe 1 7
Moisburg, German y
Wolfgang Haup t
Universitat Erlangen-Nurnber g
Erlangen, German y
Jean-Marie Kine t
University o f Lieg e
Li6ge, Belgium
Rodney W . King
CSIRO
Black Mountain , Canberra , ACT , Australi a
Donald T . Krize k
USDA/ARS
Beltsville, Marylan d
Wim d e Mun k
Bulb Research Cente r
Lisse, Netherland s
Klaus Napp-Zin n
Botanisches Institut der Universita t Kol n
(Cologne), German y
Walter W . Schwabe
University o f Londo n
Wye, England
Atsushi Takimoto
Kyoto University
Kyoto, Japa n
Kenneth Thimann
University of California
Santa Cruz , California
Daphne Vince-Prue
Goring-on-Thames
Reading, Englan d
Jan A . D. Zeevaar t
Michigan Stat e University
East Lansing , Michigan
18
STRESS PHYSIOLOGY
Leslie H. Fuchigam i
Department o f Horticulture
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Orego n 9733 1
Eugene V . Maas
U.S. Salinit y Laboratory, USD A ARS
Riverside, Californi a 9250 7
James M . Lyons
Department o f Vegetable Crop s
University of California, Davis Campus
Davis, California 95616
D. William Rains
Department o f Agronomy and Range Science
University of California, Davis Campus
Davis, California 95616
John K . Raison (deceased )
Plant Physisolog y Unit
CSIRO Divisio n o f Food Researc h & School o f Biological Science s
Macquarie University
North Ryde, 2113, N.S.W . Australia
Kenneth A . Shackel
Department o f Pomology
University of California , Davis Campus
Davis, Californi a 95616-8683
The fiel d o f stress physiolog y is not onl y of considerable theoretica l importance ; i t
is highly significant to agriculture. I n practice, researchers ten d to specialize within
at leas t fou r subfields : chillin g injury, col d stress , water stress, an d salinit y stress.
Yet, thes e subfield s hav e several basi c terms in common. Thus , this chapter begins
with the term s commo n to stud y of all plan t stresses an d is then divide d into fou r
sections representin g th e fou r subfields . Som e bold-fac e terms are als o define d in
the contex t o f othe r definitions ; words i n italics ar e define d elsewher e o r ar e
botanical names . Se e Chapter 6 for terms, units, and symbols used to describe plant
water relations (e.g., water potential and osmotic, matric, and pressure potentials, etc.),
142
Stress Physiology 14
144 Plant
Stress Physiology 14
chilling reversal Reversa l o f the primary event (s), which would be rapid and direct
and shu t of f further stimulatio n o f the secondar y events.
chilling-sensitive plants Thos e plants that are injured by exposure to temperatures
below about 1 0 C to 1 5 C, but above freezing. (Th e warm-season crops of tropical
or sub-tropica l origin s hav e receive d th e mos t study. ) Al l stage s o f growt h an d
development o f the entire plan t (excep t perhap s the dry seed) ar e susceptible. Thi s
susceptibility limit s th e seaso n o f growth, geographic distribution, an d postharves t
storage conditions of these plants. (Harveste d plan t parts, especially fruit s o f some
temperate plants , notably apples, pears, cranberries, asparagus, and potatoes, exhibit
chilling damage durin g storage whe n exposed fo r extended periods a t temperature s
very close to freezing , i.e., aroun d 2 C to 3 C . However , thes e temperature s do
not limi t growt h or geographi c distributio n o f thes e specie s a s exhibited b y warmseason crops.)
chilling temperature An y temperatur e belo w th e critical temperature, bu t abov e
freezing, tha t cause s injury .
chilling tolerance Th e abilit y of chilling-sensitive plants o r plan t parts , t o endur e
the metabolic dysfunctio n and/or harmful consequences tha t result from exposur e to
chilling temperature s an d t o surviv e if th e abus e is not sustaine d beyond a certai n
lethal point . Chillin g toleranc e i s use d t o describ e thi s differentia l respons e t o a
chilling stress and should be confined to describing differences i n the time and course
of th e developmen t o f chilling injury symptoms .
chilling treatment Th e proces s o f exposur e t o a chilling temperature fo r a tim e
period sufficient to caus e injury .
conditioning Se
critical temperature Se
146 Plant
3. COLD HARDINESS2
anaerobic stress A
stress imposed on an organism as a result of the absence of the
free oxyge n of air. Se e also ice encasement and flooding.
bacteria nucleation inhibitors Chemical
nucleation by ice-nucleation bacteria.
calorie Se
Stress Physiology 14
dehardening Se
extracellular freezing Th
e freez e dehydration.
e ability of a cell or tissue to tolerate the presence of ice in th e
148 Plant
Stress Physiology 14
e extracellular freezing .
intrinsic ice nucleator Nucleator s o f ice formin g within plan t tissue s an d organ s
resulting in crystallization a t relativel y warm subzer o temperatures.
150 Plant
Stress Physiology 15
152 Plant
Stress Physiology 15
hardening Se
154 Plant
5. SALINITY STRESS4
acclimation Se
biosalinity Interpla
cation exchange capacity (CEC) Th e total quantity of cations that a soil or othe r
material can adsorb a t a specific pH, usuall y expressed a s centimoles (millimole s is
preferred SI ) of a specifi c cation pe r kilogra m of exchanger.
chloride salinity Salinity
clay dispersion Th e separatio n o f cla y int o individua l component particle s re sulting from th e presence of monovalent cations. I n saline soils, sodium is frequently
responsible for th e dispersio n o f clay. Soil s with dispersed cla y are dens e and hav e
a greatl y reduced permeability .
compatible solute A n organic solute that accumulates inside cells without causing
severe metabolic disruption and may aid osmoregulation; for example, glycine-betaine,
proline, glycerol.
cyclic salt Sal t derive d fro m th e se a or salt lakes that is deposited o n plant s and
soils fro m win d or rainfall.
Original authors for thi s section were D.W. Rains and E.V . Maa s who wish to express special
thanks t o Richar d H . Niema n for hi s thorough review of and suggestion s for thi s set o f definitions .
Stress Physiology 15
156 Plant
osmotic stres s Externa l osmoti c potentia l below or abov e cel l osmoti c potential
sufficient t o cause strain (e.g., reduced yield). Osmoti c stress almost always refers to
external osmoti c potentials belo w those in the tissues, but osmotic potentials abov e
those o f th e tissu e (i.e. , les s negative ) ma y have som e deleteriou s effect s suc h a s
causing certain fruit s (e.g. , cherries ) t o split.
osmoticum A solut e tha t decrease s osmoti c potential s o f cel l solution s a s it s
concentration increase s (i.e. , any solute).
physiological drought Plan t water deficit (i.e. , low tissue water potential) cause d
by salinity, lo w soil wate r potential, o r othe r stress factors.
polyol A
reclamation Wit h reference to saline soils, the process of removing excess sal t t o
a leve l tha t permit s production o f plants without significant advers e effects .
saline adaptation Geneti c modification of individuals in a population that increases their abilit y to surviv e excess salt.
saline adjustment Physiologica l and biochemical changes of individual plants that
increase thei r ability to surviv e excess salt .
saline-sodic soil A
Stress Physiology 15
sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) A relatio n betwee n solubl e sodiu m and solubl e
divalent cation s tha t ca n be use d t o predic t exchangeable sodium percentage of soi l
equilibrated wit h a give n solution. I t i s defined as follows:
[Anonymous]. 1984 . Glossar y o f soil science terms. Soi l Sci. Soc. Amer., 67 7 South Segoe Road ,
Madison, Wisconsin , p 38.
Burke, M.J. , L.V . Gusta , H.A , Quamm e an d C.J . Weiser . 1976 . Freezin g an d injur y i n plants.
Annual Review o f Plant Physiology 27:507-528 .
Chapman, V.J . 1960 . Sal t Marshe s an d Sal t Desert s o f th e World . Interscienc e Pub., Inc . New
York, p 392 .
Franks, F. 1981 . Biophysic s and biochemistry of low temperatures and freezing. In : G.J. Morri s an d
A. Clark , editors . Effect s o f Lo w Temperature s o n Biologica l Membranes . Academi c Press ,
London, p 3-19 .
Levitt, J . 1980 . Response s o f plant s t o environmenta l stresses. Vo l 1 , Chilling , freezin g an d
temperature stresses . Academi c Press, Ne w York.
158 Plant
Levitt, J. 1980 . Response s of plants t o environmenta l stresses, Vol 2, Water, radiation , salt, and
other stresses. Academi c Press , Ne w York.
Li, P.H. an d A Sakai , editors. 1978 . Plan t Cold Hardiness and Freezing Stress . Vo l 1. Academi c
Press, Ne w York.
Li, P.H . an d A Saka i 1982 . Plan t Cold Hardines s and Freezin g Stress. Vo l 2. Academi c Press ,
New York.
Little, R.J . an d C.E . Jones . 1980 . A dictionary of botany. Va n Nostran d Reinhold, Ne w York.
Luyet, B.J . 1968 . Th e formatio n o f ic e an d th e physica l behavior o f th e ic e phas e i n aqueou s
solutions and i n biological systems. In : J. Hawthorne and E.J. Rolfe , editors. Lo w Temperatur e
Biology of Foodstuffs. Pergamo n Press , Ne w York, p 53-77 .
Lyons, J.M. an d R.W . Breidenbach . 1987 . Chillin g injury . In : J . Weichman , editor. Postharves t
Physiology of Vegetables. Marce l Dekker, Inc. , New York, p 305-326.
Mazur, P. 1969 . Freezin g injur y i n plants. Annua l Review of Plant Physiology 20:419-448.
Raison, J.K. an d J.M. Lyons . 1986 . Chillin g injury: a plea for uniform terminology . Plant , Cell, and
Env. 9:685.
Sakai, A. and W. Larcher. 1978 . Fros t survival of plant responses and adaptation to freezing stress.
Springer-Verlag, Ne w York.
Salisbury, F.B. , an d C.W. Ross. 1992 . Plan t Physiology , Fourth edition. Wadswort h Publishin g Co. ,
Belmont, California.
Saltveit, M.E. , Jr . an d L.L . Morris . 1990 . Overvie w on chillin g injur y o f horticultura l crops. In :
C.Y. Wang, editor. Chillin g Injury o f Horticultural Crops. CR C Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida .
p 3-15 .
Sinclair, T.R . an d M.M . Ludlow . 1985 . Wh o taugh t plant s thermodynamics ? Th e unfulfille d
potential o f plant water potential . Aust . J . Plan t Physiol. 12:213-217.
Staples, R.C. an d G.H. Toenniessen , editors . 1984 . Salinit y Tolerance i n Plants - Stategies for Crop
Improvement. Joh n Wile y & Sons, New York.
Turner, N.C . 1979 . Drough t resistanc e an d adaptatio n to water stres s i n crop plants . In : Stres s
physiology i n cro p plants . H.W . Mussel l and R.C . Staples , editors . Wile y (Interscience), Ne w
York.
United States Salinity Laboratory Staff . 1954 . Diagnosi s and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils.
U. S. Dept. Agr. Handboo k No . 60. p 160 .
Weiser, C.J . 1970 . Col d resistanc e an d injur y i n woody plants. Science . 69:1269-1278 .
Weiser, C.J . 1982 . Plan t Cold Hardines s and Freezing Stress. Vo l 2. Academi c Press, New York.
Consultants
John S . Boyer Ton
University o f Delaware Orego
Lewes, Delawar e Corvallis
y H.H. Che n
n Stat e University
, Oregon
l Epstein (retired )
y of Californi a
, Californi a
d E. Francoi s
A Agricultural Research Servic e
, Californi a
e M. Grieve
A Agricultura l Research Service ,
, California
e V. Gusta
y o f Saskatchewan
, Saskatchewan, Canada
Stress Physiology 15
Anthony E . Hal l
University o f California
Riverside, Californi a
Robert L. Jefferie s
University o f Toronto
Toronto, Ontario , Canad a
Mikal E . Saltvei t
University of California
Davis, California
Delmer O . Ketchi e
Washington State Universit y
Wenatchee, Washingto n
Richard C . Staple s
Cornell Universit y
Ithaca, Ne w York
Mark A . Matthew s
University of Californi a
Davis, Californi a
Donald L . Suare z
USDA Agricultural Researc h Service
Riverside, Californi a
Charles G . Suhayda
USDA-Agricultural Research Servic e
Pasadena, California
Robert E . Paull
University o f Hawaii a t Mano a
Honolulu, Hawai i
Robert W . Pearc y
University of California
Davis, Californi a
Albert C . Purvis
University o f Georgi a
Coastal Plai n Experiment Statio n
Tifton, Georgi a
Harvey A . Quamm e
Research Statio n
Summerland, BC , Canad a
James D. Rhoades
USDA Agricultural Research Servic e
Riverside, Californi a
Frank B . Salisbury
Utah State Universit y
Logan, Uta h
Michael C . Shannon
USDA Agricultura l Research Servic e
Riverside, Californi a
Karen Tanin o
University of Saskatchewa n
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan , Canada
Ralph Weimber g (retired)
USDA Agricultura l Research Servic e
Riverside, California
Chien Y i Wang
U.S.D.A. Beltsvill e Agricultura l Researc h
Center, Maryland
Conrad J . Weise r
Oregon Stat e Universit y
Corvallis, Orego n
Clyde Wilso n
USDA Agricultura l Research Servic e
Riverside, California
Michael Wisniewski
USDA Agricultural Researc h Service
Kearneysville, Wes t Virginia
Anne F . Wron a
University of California
Holtville, California
APPENDICES
PRESENTING SCIENTIFIC DATA
Anyone ca n d o experiments , bu t i f th e result s ar e t o qualif y a s science , mor e i s
required tha n special techniques, logical thought processes, and elaborate equipment .
It i s not th e whit e laborator y coat s an d foul-smellin g chemicals , o r eve n th e fiel d
stations o r telescope s o r orbitin g satellites , tha t qualif y a work as science. T o b e
science, the results o f one's investigations must be presented t o one's colleagues fo r
their evaluatio n an d perhap s fo r the m t o us e in their ow n attempts t o expan d th e
limits o f huma n understanding . Dat a mus t b e publishe d o r otherwis e presented .
"Publish o r perish " may be thought of by some as an unfair deman d placed o n goo d
teachers, but without publication (presentation) , a n investigation does not qualif y as
science. Indeed , unles s th e result s o f one' s effort s ar e communicate d t o one' s
colleagues, th e resources (ofte n ta x funds) use d to produce thos e result s ar e wasted.
Presentation of data requires the use of language. Typically , results are described
in a scientific paper, s o Appendix A is a discussion of writing. Th e discussio n doe s
not emphasiz e th e usua l forma t o f a scientifi c paper (Introduction , Method s an d
Materials, Results , Discussion) ; suc h a patter n i s wel l know n t o scientists , an d
specific detail s can be seen in the journals t o which authors inten d t o submit thei r
manuscripts. I t is imperative tha t authors consult such sources before preparing and
submitting manuscripts . Th e discussio n her e present s som e principle s o f Englis h
grammar and style. Althoug h spac e limitation s eliminat e a complete analysi s of the
English language , a n attempt i s made to cover th e basic s in a somewhat logica l way
and to emphasize a few points that often ar e not appreciated. Scientist s al l over th e
world mus t now prepare som e o f their manuscript s in English even when English is
not thei r nativ e language . Althoug h goo d cop y editor s kno w th e rule s discusse d
here, many scientist author s apparentl y do not , an d fe w journals do an y extensive
copy editing. Hence , it is easy to find example s in the curren t scientific literature of
the problems describe d i n Appendix A .
Data are als o communicate d at scientific meetings . Traditionally , this has bee n
an oral presentation illustrate d b y slides. Durin g recent years , such slide talk s have
included man y tex t slide s a s wel l a s th e traditiona l photographs , dat a graphs ,
diagrams, and othe r figures . Compute r program s have made it possible to prepar e
beautiful an d elaborat e slides . Nevertheless , suc h talk s ar e sometime s poorl y
presented an d poorl y received . Member s o f the audienc e ma y have to struggl e t o
understand what is being discussed. I n many cases, communicatio n could be better
achieved i f a few simple rules were followed durin g preparation and presentatio n of
161
162 Appendices
the slides . Appendix B discusses many of these rules. Man y scientific societies no w
emphasize poster s ove r ora l presentations , an d again, many posters ar e difficul t t o
assimilate i n th e availabl e time. Thus , Appendi x B also discusse s some rules an d
suggestions tha t can improve communication between a poster presenter an d his or
her audience. W e recognize that writing styles, slide talks, and poster presentation s
represent the personal expressions of their authors. B y the same token, Appendices
A an d B represent persona l viewpoints. W e hope thi s wil l no t detrac t fro m thei r
potential value .
Plant scientists ofte n depen d upon growth chambers in their research , but ther e
are many kinds of chambers and many ways that the experimental conditions ca n be
reported. Thus , Appendix C presents guideline s fo r measurin g and reportin g th e
environmental parameter s o f growth-chambe r experiments. Th e guideline s wer e
formulated by a special committee of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers
(ASAE). Th e guidelines are essentially an application of the principles presented in
Section II . The y have been edite d slightl y to conform , a s far a s possible, t o othe r
recommendations i n this book.
A
SOME SUGGESTIONS ABOUT SCIENTIFIC WRITING
Frank B . Salisbury
Plant Scienc e Departmen t
Utah Stat e Universit y
Logan, Utah 84322-482 0 U.S.A .
As a budding young scientist a t th e university , I found m y English classes t o be very
distasteful. Ther e seeme d t o b e n o logicn o sciencet o the language , onl y a n
assemblage o f arbitrary rules. The n I lived for two years in Switzerland and learne d
German, a highl y logical language . Gradually , through analog y with the Germa n
grammar I was enjoying s o much, I began t o se e som e glimmering s of logic in my
native tongue. Later , a s I became involve d in text-book writing, the cop y editors at
Wadsworth Publishing Company piqued my curiosity by the changes they made in my
manuscripts. Wh y should which sometimes be changed to that, for example? I began
to browse the style manuals and rule books, findin g a little more logic in the English
language, ofte n burie d i n th e assemblag e o f arbitrary rules.
For th e pas t fe w years, I hav e bee n editin g submitte d manuscript s fro m th e
Americas an d Pacifi c Rim countrie s fo r the Journal of Plant Physiology . O f cours e
there ar e special problem s face d b y authors whose native tongue is not English , and
part of the discussio n her e has them in mind. Furthermore , not al l my fellow nativ e
English speaker s se e th e structur e o f Englis h a s I do. Rule s o f punctuation , fo r
example, base d o n th e logi c o f the languag e as I came t o understan d it an d a s th e
manuals describe it, seem to be breaking down. Usag e continually changes the rules.
What follow s summarizes my personal vie w of how the logi c of English can b e
expressed wit h th e hel p of punctuation and a suitable choice of words. A s fa r as I
know, my approach t o th e topi c i s unique although I can back up ever y rule with
references t o the much more extensive manuals, and my discussion has been checked
by three grammarians. I hope tha t you will approve of this approach and apply its
recommendations. Tim e will tell ho w much usage will change the rule s and henc e
my approachand perhaps mak e th e language even more arbitrary and less logical !
Clearly, th e bes t communicatio n require s a n agreemen t o n languag e convention s
between bot h reade r an d author . A prope r comprehensio n o f suitabl e writin g
conventions i s essential, just as acceptance an d understanding are required for proper
use of the othe r units , symbols, and term s presented in this book. T o this end, th e
following i s offered .
163
164 Appendices:
1. THE SENTENCE
While i t may be impossible t o define a sentence i n a broad sense that will cover
all example s (Pinckert , 1986) , a sentenc e i n technica l writin g is seldom difficul t t o
recognize. Indeed , grammarian s recogniz e onl y six basic sentenc e structure s (se e
box). A complet e sentenc e contain s a t leas t on e subjec t ( a noun) wit h it s verb
(Plants grow. Jesus wept.), and most of the time it also includes an object of the verb
along with modifying adjectives, adverbs, various phrases tha t act as modifiers, and
often a conjunction tha t join s one word with another, one phras e with another , o r
one claus e wit h another. Prepositions ma y be placed i n front o f nouns t o show the
relationship o f the nou n to othe r word s in the sentence, an d pronouns (which, in a
sense, are reall y nouns) ma y be used t o substitute for other nouns . Sometimes , bu t
not ofte n i n technical writing , an interjection may be added although i t ha s no rea l
relationship t o anything in the sentence . (A h ha, we discovered that plants grow.) A
sentence may include any of the eight parts of speech (writte n in bold face above), bu t
the key to recognizing a complete sentenc e is to recognize the subject and the verb.
The verb i s needed fo r the predicate (what is being said about th e subject, including
the verb wit h or without objects , complements , o r modifiers) . I f either th e subjec t
or the verb is missing, the resul t is a sentence fragment (or an incomplete sentence)
rather tha n a complete sentence .
Writing elementary sentence s seldo m cause s any difficulty fo r a scientific writer,
but problem s sometime s aris e whe n a sentenc e contain s mor e tha n on e subjec t
and/or mor e tha n one verb. Shoul d tw o ideas, each with a subject and predicate, b e
included i n on e sentence , o r shoul d the y be separate d int o tw o sentences ? Ho w
should the relationship betwee n these ideas be formulated and expressed? Thes e are
decisions tha t a n author mus t make in the attempt to best communicate what he or
she wants to say. I t is essential t o kno w the availabl e options i f one i s to mak e th e
best decisions. Th e relationship betwee n tw o ideas can be expressed at several levels ,
and thes e ar e indicate d b y various system s of punctuation.
A. Closely Related; Subject or Verb is Shared. Man y authors , includin g
technical writers , ti e togethe r (coordinate ) tw o subject-predicat e idea s wit h a
coordinating conjunction and omit the subject before the second verb , knowing that
the reader wil l refer to the original subject to understand the second predicate . Th e
sentence just presente d provide s a n example . Th e subjec t is authors (modified by
several words) , th e firs t ver b i s tie, an d th e secon d ver b i s omit, whic h als o ha s
authors a s it s subject . Th e idea s ar e tie d togethe r b y the conjunctio n and, which
coordinates th e tw o ideas . Coordinating conjunctions includ e and, but, or, nor, for,
and so. Not e tha t th e firs t clause ( a group o f words with expressed o r understoo d
subject an d predicate ideas ) i s independent because it has both a subject and a verb,
while the secon d clause i s dependent on th e first . Th e secon d claus e i s dependen t
because i t lack s a subject o f its own but depend s o n th e independen t claus e fo r it s
subject (a s i n thi s sentence , followin g but). Som e dependen t clause s lac k a ver b
instead o f a subject althoug h thi s i s less common . Th e questio n concerns ho w th e
relationship between th e two ideas in such sentences should be communicated to th e
reader b y punctuation. Sinc e bot h idea s shar e a commo n subject, the y are closel y
related, an d logi c suggest s tha t n o comm a (n o paus e i f spoke n aloud ) i s neede d
subject verb
2.
3.
subject verb
4.
5.
6.
subject I verb
Examples;
1. Jesus wept.
2. The dirty clothes are probably in the hamper.
3. I t i s cold. I t tastes sour. This is he. (Th e complemen t i s either
an adjectiv e o r a nominative-case nou n or pronoun. )
4. W e found him. Sh e measured the plant. (Th e object is always in
the objectiv e case , a matter o f concern onl y with pronouns. )
5. H e gave her the ring. (Th e indirect object, her, defines the recipi ent o f the actio n o f a transitive verb.)
6. Th e sight turned hi s hair grey. Th e speech made everyone angry.
We elected him president (Th e objectiv e complement tell s what
happened t o th e object a s a result o f the actio n o f the verb. )
This material was supplied b y Moyle Q . Rice .
166 Appendices:
168 Appendices:
sion (although, though, even though), and caus e (because, since, and th e weake r for
and as). An y of these and other s ca n be used to show how the subordinat e claus e
relates t o th e mai n clause . Changin g tw o coordinat e clause s connecte d wit h a
conjunction t o a mai n claus e wit h it s subordinat e claus e ca n ofte n clarif y an d
generally improv e th e writin g (Pinckert, 1986) . Th e easy way is to us e coordinat e
clauses. A better way, although on e tha t require s som e menta l effort, i s to clarif y
relationships b y forming subordinate clauses. S o that it does not sound like an after thought, i t ofte n help s t o pu t th e subordinat e claus e firs t (a s i n thi s sentence) .
Consider thes e tw o sentences: Galleys should b e returned t o the editor after they have
been carefull y read. After th e galleys have been carefully read, they should b e returned
to the editor.
The rul e fo r punctuatin g between a mai n clause an d it s subordinat e clause i s
simple: I f the subordinat e claus e comes first , i t i s followed b y a comma; if it comes
after th e main clause, it is not. ( . . .it is not i f it comes after th e main clause.) Becaus e
a subordinate claus e shoul d never stand alone (formin g a sentence fragment rathe r
than a complet e sentence) , i t mus t alway s occu r i n th e sam e sentence a s it s main
clause. Thi s means that it should not be separated fro m a preceding main clause by
a comm a o r semicolon. Tha t i s the rule , althoug h it sometimes seems appropriat e
to ad d th e comm a fo r emphasi s (a s was done here). I n the mos t informal writing,
an author ca n add a dash to provide strong emphasis on th e subordinate phrase o r
clausealthough dashe s ten d t o b e overuse d b y writers who ar e insecur e i n thei r
knowledge o f punctuation. Whe n in doubt , add a dash! O f course thi s should be
avoided.
There is a complication. Som e subordinating conjunctions (e.g., although) can
be used a s conjunctive adverbs . I n such cases, punctuation should follo w th e rule s
described abov e fo r such conjunctiv e adverbs.
F. Beginning a Sentence with a Coordinating Conjunction. A t leas t on e
important questio n remains : I s it correc t t o begi n a sentenc e with a coordinating
conjunction (and, but, etc.)? Becaus e coordinating conjunctions are normall y used
to splic e together tw o clauses, they cannot come at the beginning of the sentence if
both clause s ar e presen t (a s th e subordinatin g conjunction because di d i n thi s
sentence). Bu t what abou t a sentenc e tha t begin s with a conjunction but contain s
only one clause ? Sometimes , for emphasis, an author may want to arbitrarily make
two sentence s ou t o f a compoun d sentenc e tha t ha s a coordinatin g conjunction
between tw o independent clauses . Doin g so ties th e sentenc e tha t begin s with th e
coordinating conjunction to the thought of the previous sentence mor e closely than
would be th e cas e without the conjunction . I t i s acceptable t o begin a sentence with
a conjunction. An d sometimes it can provide impact. I n thi s case, th e coordinatin g
conjunction act s more lik e a conjunctive adverb. Bu t like many devices of this type,
it ca n be overdone . I t should be use d with care.
2. MODIFYING WORDS
For th e mos t part , the us e o f modifyin g word s is relatively eas y in th e Englis h
language, but a fe w problems arise.
170 Appendices:
well experiment wa s done good. Well i s the adver b that modifies the verb was done,
while good i s the adjectiv e tha t modifie s the nou n experiment,
Note tha t sense-impression verbs ar e followe d b y th e adjectiva l rathe r tha n
adverbial forms : I t tastes good. I t smells bad. H e looks sick. I feel ba d (rather tha n
I feel badly) . I feel good. ( I feel well means that I feel healthy rather than sick if well
modifies I-o r tha t I have a good sens e of touch if well modifie s feel.)
A word o f warning about adverbs : Man y writers seem t o have the notio n tha t
adverbs ar e ver y elegant, bu t ofte n the y are inherentl y vague. Ho w elegant i s very
elegant? Ho w vagu e i s inherently vague ? W e ca n ofte n tighte n ou r writin g by
eliminating very, too, greatly, really, actually, extremely, quite, rather, slightly, fairly ,
somewhat, t o a certain extent, and ver y man y others! O f cours e thes e word s ar e
sometimes useful .
C. Prepositions and the Objective Case. Englis h is relatively easy for foreigners
to lear n (t o begi n with , a t least ) becaus e nouns , a s wel l a s adjectives , ar e no t
inflected accordin g to case and gender. Thi s means that there are few problems with
the us e o f prepositions, whic h ar e word s tha t ar e place d i n fron t o f noun s an d
pronouns t o sho w the relationshi p o f the nou n to other words in the sentence : fil l
to the calibratio n mark , for a good reason , behind th e scutellum , with care, between
the lines , etc . Noun s followin g preposition s ar e alway s i n th e objective case, bu t
since English noun s have the same form in the subjective and the objective cases, we
seldom give the matter any thought. Tha t is probably why we may have trouble when
we use Englis h pronoun s tha t d o have a special for m i n th e objectiv e case. Ther e
are onl y si x of the m i n moder n English : me , him, her, us, them, an d whom (plu s
whomever and th e obsolet e thee). 1
We seldo m hav e troubl e whe n th e nou n follow s th e prepositio n directly , bu t
many Americans (wh o seem to have little sense of case because it is such a small part
of the language ) say between you and I instead of the correct between you and me, an d
it i s not uncommo n t o hea r with we girls instea d o f with us girls. Direc t o r indirec t
objects o f verb s ar e als o i n th e objectiv e case : H e gave her the unit, an d it s probe
contacted him an d me. I n technical writing, we use fewer personal pronouns anyway,
but w e must be careful when we do use them.
D. Personal Pronouns. A s a matte r o f fact , w e shoul d probabl y us e mor e
personal pronoun s i n our scientifi c writing. I t is highly artificial t o put ou r writing
always i n th e thir d perso n b y saying the author did thi s or tha t instea d o f simply
saying / o r w e did it. Man y modern editor s ar e no w insisting on the firs t perso n
instead o f the out-of-date third person. Fo r one thing, an author should be willing
to tak e responsibilit y fo r his or he r experimenta l results and philosophica l sugges tions by speaking i n th e firs t perso n instea d of hidin g behind some almos t anonymous author who seems t o be doin g the writing. Sayin g the author doesn't mak e a
paper an y more objective .
The subjective form s are /, he, she, we, they, who, an d thou; possessiv e forms are my, mine, his,
her, hers, its, our, ours, their, theirs, whose, and thine; it and you ar e th e sam e in the subjective and th e
objective cases .
172 Appendices:
not t o get too upse t when others fai l t o follow it. Perhaps , as the years go by, it will
be adhered t o by more an d more author s an d editors .
That an d wh o provid e anothe r pai r o f relativ e pronouns . Again , th e rul e i s
simple, and agai n it is often broken. Wh o should be used with reference t o people;
that i s used fo r everythin g else. A claus e beginning with who (o r whom if it i s th e
object of a sentence or a preposition) ca n be restrictive or nonrestrictive; us e of the
comma tell s when it i s nonrestrictive .
Nonrestrictive introductory phrases o r phrases a t the end of a sentence should
be set of f from th e rest of the sentenc e wit h a comma in formal writing. Usag e has
led to the omission of this comma when the phrases are short, but more frequent use
of a comma to set off introductory or final phrases would lead to clearer writing. A s
reading experience demonstrates, th e sligh t break or pause indicated b y the comma
often contribute s t o eas e of understanding, as in this sentence.
The discussion o f how to punctuate nonrestrictive phrases o r clauses brings up
a logica l rul e tha t i s often violate d b y modern writers: Put a pair of commas, or
none, between subject and verb, or verb and object, or subjective complement. T o
say it anothe r way : A subjec t an d it s ver b shoul d neve r b e separate d b y a singl e
comma (unless the comma occurs between coordinate adjectives). I f subject and verb
are separate d b y a nonrestrictiv e phras e or clause, there mus t be two commas that
surround th e phras e o r clause . Th e rul e is broken, especiall y i n technica l writing,
because the subject may be modified with so many words and phrases that the author
feels the reader will run out of breath by the time he or she gets to the verb; the rest
afforded b y a comma seems t o b e in order. Bu t this comma will be very distracting
to a reader who is really paying attention. Th e reader i s anticipating the action, th e
verb, an d i s confuse d b y bein g tol d t o paus e jus t befor e gettin g ther e whe n n o
nonrestrictive (parenthetical ) materia l justifie s th e pause . Th e sample that ha d a
large, green leaf attached to the brown stem with an expanded petiole base but virtually
no thickened cuticle or acute lobe was chosen for th e herbarium. Some author s might
be tempte d t o pu t a comm a befor e th e was. O f course , th e sentenc e woul d b e
improved b y recasting i t a s two sentences .
B. Parenthetical Phrases or Clauses. Nonrestrictiv e phrases or clauses (as just
described) ar e parenthetical, which is to say that they contribute important informa tion but are not essential t o understand the rest of the sentence or to its grammatical
structure. I f the sentence is correctly constructed, the parenthetical phrase or clause
can be removed (alon g with the punctuation that sets it apart, the parentheses i n this
case), and what remains will still be a grammatically correct sentence . Parenthetica l
phrases ca n be punctuated i n four ways: wit h commas (as we have been discussing) ,
with parentheses2 (round brackets), with brackets (square brackets), and with dashes.
The choic e belong s t o th e author , bu t th e choic e ca n conve y an author' s feelin g
about th e parenthetica l material . I f commas ar e used , th e informatio n i s closel y
related t o th e sentence , almost restrictive , we might say.
2
In Britain and other United Kingdo m countries, the term parentheses is generally applied simply
to portions of text that are parenthetica l while bracket is a generic term for all parenthetical symbols:
round brackets ( ) , square brackets [ ] , curly brackets{ } , and angle d brackets< > .
174 Appendices:
If parentheses (round brackets) are used , the materia l is more of a side issue .
It is important (or it would not be included at all), but it is not as closely related t o
the res t o f th e sentenc e a s would be th e cas e whe n commas are used . Use d to o
often, parentheses ca n be distracting, always confronting the reader with extraneous
information tha t may seem beside th e point. Thi s feeling can often be changed just
by changin g som e parenthese s t o commas . I f th e informatio n reall y i s almos t
unrelated t o th e res t o f th e sentence , however , i t shoul d be in parentheses , an d a
long sentence can sometimes b e made easier t o understan d by placing some of th e
material i n parentheses. I n a sense , thi s removes it fro m th e sentenc e althoug h it
might remai n exactly where it was. (Th e material might also be moved somewhere
else.)
Brackets [square brackets] are ofte n reserve d i n forma l writing for comment s
inserted by an editor. Th e editor can be the author if he or she is quoting someone
else but needs to insert an explanation or comment in the quoted material. Bracket s
can also be used as parentheses within parentheses: Evans and an assistant (Gillespie,
who made her own study of a flightless bird [the kiwi] in Australia) spent several
difficult months in the field.
Dashes are much less formal and should seldom if ever be used in technical writing-unless the autho r feels justified i n adding the stron g emphasis provided by use
of the dash or dashes-and if the author is confident that the editor will not remov e
the dashes ! I f comma s ar e include d i n a phras e se t of f with dashes, th e dashe s
become essential . (Th e exclamatio n poin t i s als o seldo m use d i n technica l writ ing-for th e sam e reasons dashe s are seldom used!! [ I tend t o overus e both!] )
Two point s abou t parenthetica l materia l nee d t o b e noted : First , sinc e al l
parenthetical material is by definition nonrestrictive, parenthetical phrases (regardless
of how they are punctuated) that are introduced by a relative pronoun should always
use which (o r wh o o r whom) instea d o f that. Second , sinc e i t shoul d alway s b e
possible t o remov e a parenthetical phras e or clause without affecting th e structur e
of wha t i s left , a n autho r mus t neve r us e doubl e commas , (lik e this) , aroun d
parentheses o r brackets .
Where i s the perio d place d i n relatio n t o material in parentheses o r brackets ?
If th e materia l i n parenthese s come s a t th e en d o f a sentenc e an d i s itsel f a n
incomplete sentenc e (sentenc e fragment) , th e perio d i s place d outsid e o f th e
parentheses (lik e this) . I f the materia l i n th e parenthese s come s a t th e en d o f a
sentence but b y itself forms a complete sentence, then such a parenthetical sentence
should b e se t withi n its ow n parenthesis . (I n suc h a case , th e firs t lette r o f th e
parenthetical sentenc e should be capitalized, and a period shoul d be placed a t th e
end o f th e sentenc e an d befor e th e las t parenthesis , lik e this. ) Ther e i s n o rul e
saying tha t parenthetica l materia l must be included in some other sentence ; it can
and often should stand on it s own, as in the example . Ther e i s also no rule saying
that parenthetical material cannot form a complete sentence within a sentence (it can
be distracting , as here, so i t i s well to avoi d the practic e when possible), bu t i f th e
complete-sentence, parenthetica l material can be placed after it s "parent sentence,"
it migh t just as well be give n a lif e o f it s own, cut of f from it s parent . Whe n it i s
included within another sentence, i t is not punctuate d as an independent sentence .
A. Plural an d singula r verbs . Plura l verbs must be use d with plural subjects ,
singular verbs with singular subjects. Tha t is , a verb must agree with its subject i n
person an d number .
A subject consisting of two or more singular nouns connected with and is plural:
One nou n an d anothe r nou n mak e a plura l subject . I f tw o singula r noun s ar e
connected by or, the subjec t is singular (but plural if the nou n closest t o th e verb is
plural).
A singula r subject followe d b y a modifyin g prepositiona l o r othe r phras e tha t
contains plura l nouns or more than one singular noun is nevertheless singular (as in
this sentence and the on e that begin s the previous paragraph).
Some nouns taken from language s other than English form thei r plurals in ways
that ar e no t alway s familiar; watch for these (datum an d data, medium an d media,
etc.; se e Section 8) .
B. Ver b tense. Ver b tens e should be consistent. I t is usually logical to use th e
past tens e i n describin g methods , materials , an d result s i n a scientifi c paper: W e
found that applied LA A strongly promoted elongation o f intact pea plants. Th e
experiments were done in the past, and it is conceivable that they might give different
results i f repeate d (i f al l determinin g condition s ar e no t know n or understood) .
Hence, th e hones t wa y to describ e the m i s to us e the pas t tense . Avoi d changin g
tense i n th e middl e o f a descriptio n o f method s o r results , usuall y i n a singl e
paragraph. Publishe d result s ma y be described wit h the presen t tense : Yang e t al.
(1993) showed that a continuous supply of auxin enhances stem elongation in intact
plants.
C. Participles. Englis h form s a present participle by adding -ing to the infinitive
of th e verb . Thi s i s combined wit h som e for m o f th e ver b to b e to emphasiz e a n
action tha t i s occurring (or tha t was occurring or has been occurring or will be occurring). Thi s i s such a n importan t par t o f the Englis h languag e that nativ e speakers
virtually neve r use it incorrectly , but it is ofte n difficul t for writer s whos e nativ e
tongue i s not English . Th e tendenc y is to us e this verb form to o often , when i t is
not needed . Eve n nativ e speakers ca n frequently tighte n their writing by changing
to th e simpl e form s (i t occurs, occurred, has occurred, will occur, for example) .
A special problem i s the dangling participle, whic h is a participle that cannot b e
connected immediatel y an d unmistakabl y with th e word(s ) t o whic h i t refers .
Because the antecedent of the verb is often left to the reader's imagination, sentences
with dangling participles ca n often b e quite ludicrous: Coming into the greenhouse,
the large skunk cabbage gave off a n overwhelming stench. (Wh o entere d th e green house? Th e writer or th e skunk cabbage?)
English usuall y forms a past participle b y adding -ed to the verb and combining
it with another auxiliar y verb, usuall y a for m o f to have. Thi s verb for m indicate s
that a n actio n wa s begun i n th e pas t relativ e t o th e tim e being referre d t o bu t i s
completed i n that time being referred to, which can be the present, the past, or even
the future : I have measured. Sh e ha s measured. H e ha d measured. Yo u will have
measured. Th e pas t participl e can usuall y b e replaced wit h a simple past o r futur e
form: / measured. Sh e measured. H e measured. Yo u will measure. Nevertheless , it
176 Appendices:
A. Avoi d sentence fragments (incomplete sentences terminated with a period), and do not use
a comma when a perio d (o r semicolon) shoul d be used; that is, avoid the comm a fault .
t o separat e comple x items in series whe n each item itself consists of a serie s
of items : These ar e important plant hormones: auxin, typically a stem growth
promoter; the gibberellins, also promoters of stem growth; cytokinins, stimulators
of cell division; and ethylene and abscisic acid, sometimes called stress hormones.
E. Use commas:
- betwee n item s in a series, including before the and that precedes the last item :
The equipment included a camera, portrait lens, an d flash attachment. Thi s
serial comma, as i t i s called , i s ofte n omitte d b y moder n writers . Mos t
manuals still recommend its use.
n compoun d adjectives.
178 Appendices:
-t
180 Appendices:
of since o r because: Sh e did not hear the bell as she was on th e terrace. Di d sh e
fail t o hea r th e bel l because sh e wa s on th e terrac e o r while sh e wa s o n th e
terrace?
as . ..as, s o . . . as I n positive comparisons , as...as is the construction tha t is used: a
tough as nails. I n negative comparisons, eithe r as . . a.s or so . . .
as can be used: ...no
as (o r so) skilled a s his technician. Th e firs t as should not b e omitted in positiv e
comparisons. (Don' t say : Th e sound wa s clear a s a bell. Say : ...as clear a s a
bell.)
can, may Ca n i s used t o indicat e abilit y to d o something ; may, to ask , grant , or
deny permission t o d o it . Thi s distinctio n should be followed in formal writing.
datum, data Traditionally , especially i n technical writing, datum ha s bee n consid ered singula r ( a fac t o r singl e ite m o f information ; a singl e number ) an d data
plural, bu t popula r usag e ha s almos t eliminate d th e singula r datum fro m th e
language, an d data i s almos t universall y used a s a singula r noun ( a collective :
information organized for analysis). A few of us continue to say . . . thesedata are .
but a s our generatio n die s off, data wil l no doubt be used only as a singular noun.
(I fin d thi s regrettable! )
due to Thi s expression i s often overused in technical writing. I t is correct whe n it
is used a s a predicat e adjectiv e that follow s som e for m o f th e ver b to b e an d i n
the sens e o f caused b y or attributable to: Th e broken centrifuge wa s largely du e t o
faulty maintenance. Thi s coul d b e replace d b y ...was caused largely by... I t i s
somewhat les s correct , although commonly used, i n th e sens e o f because of , o n
account of , owing to, o r through: Th e centrifuge failed du e t o faulty maintenance.
In forma l writing , it would be better t o say . . .because o f faultyits, it's It s is the possesiv e for m o f the pronoun it, but used in this case without th e
apostrophe: ...the graph with it s curves... It's i s a contraction o f i t is an d i t has:
It's no t new; it's been done before. (Overus e of the contraction s sometimes makes
the writing seem to o informal. )
et al. Thi s is properly use d in bibliographies t o mea n and others. Not e th e perio d
after th e secon d element . Becaus e i t i s Latin , som e editor s insis t tha t i t b e
italicized (o r underlined) .
information I n som e language s othe r tha n English , th e comparabl e ter m fo r
information ma y be a plural (e.g., French, Spanish, Russian) or may be used a s a
plural (e.g. , German) . I t i s never correct i n scientific English to us e information
as a plural: informations.
lay, lie La y (t o put , place , o r prepare ) alway s take s a direct objec t (lay it down);
that is, lay is a transitive verb. Li e (t o recline or be situated) never does; that is,
lie is an intransitive verb. Bu t th e pas t tense and past participle of lay is laid, and
the pas t tens e o f li e i s lay, the pas t participl e i s lain. Thi s certainl y leads t o
confusion. Si t an d set are equall y troublesome.
like, as Like an d a s are correctl y use d as prepositions expressing different senses .
In this case, like indicates resemblance to the object mentioned: H e looks like his
brother. I t ca n always be replaced b y similar to. A s indicate s a role, capacity , or
function: H e serves as Department Head. (On e could say serves like a Department
Head, referrin g to someone wh o is not a Department Head bu t serve s like one. )
182 Appendices:
Most journals have printed instructions with many details on suitable format fo r
manuscripts. Th e CBE Style Manual Committee (1994) als o ha s a n extensiv e
discussion of format. Author s mus t carefully study such instructions before writing
and certainl y befor e submitting a manuscript to a particular journal. I f the forma t
does not follow that of the journal, reviewers may assume (sometimes correctly) that
the manuscript was submitted to another journal and rejected. A t the very least, an
incorrect forma t tells the editor that the authors were too careless to bother checking
such details before submitting a manuscriptand thus may be careless in carrying out
the scientific study that is being described. Incorrec t formatting also fails to consider
the editors and reviewers who must read th e manuscript .
A fe w suggestions, mostl y my own personal preferences , com e t o mind : Manu scripts submitte d fo r publicatio n shoul d always b e doubl e spaced ; thi s include s
captions, footnotes , quotations , everything. Th e double spacing is to help reviewers,
copy editors, an d compositors edi t an d otherwise mark the text . (Becaus e it is now
so eas y t o reproduc e an d eve n t o rewor k a manuscript , it i s quit e i n orde r fo r
reviewers t o writ e directl y o n th e manuscript. ) Title s shoul d b e bot h brie f an d
descriptive. Becaus e th e titl e i s usually the firs t thin g a potentia l reade r sees , it s
importance can' t b e overestimated. Nex t in importance is the abstract , which must
also b e as brief as possible (s o as not t o discourage a potential reader) whil e at th e
same tim e conveyin g all th e ke y point s includin g reason s fo r th e stud y an d th e
important conclusions . Al l plan t materia l must b e accuratel y name d both i n th e
abstract an d i n th e section s describin g method s an d material s (see Chapte r 2) .
Figures an d table s conve y th e actua l dat a produce d b y th e stud y tha t i s bein g
184 Appendices:
are ofte n a t leas t on e spac e large r tha n space s betwee n othe r words . Thi s uneve n
spacing occurs especiall y wit h non-proportional font s (e.g. , Courier). Som e reader s
also fin d thi s distracting .
If an author must justify th e right margin of a manuscript (and it can make a good
initial impression) , grea t effor t shoul d b e expende d t o hyphenat e correctl y (a s
professional typesetter s have always done), an d only the bes t o f printers capable of
microjustification shoul d b e use d fo r th e fina l product . Otherwise , right-margin
justification gains nothing while it provides an added irritation that may not produc e
the desire d receptiv e attitude in a reviewer.
10. SUMMARY
A. The sentence.
1. Tw o ideas in a sentence connected with a coordinating conjunction may share
a commo n subjec t (o r sometime s a verb), in which case the y should not b e
separated with a comma or other punctuation: Th e sentence presents one idea
and adds another to fortify the first.
2. Independen t clause s connecte d b y a coordinatin g conjunctio n shoul d b e
separated b y a comma before the conjunction : Th e first clause has a subject
and verb, and the second clause also has both subject and verb.
3. Closel y related sentence s no t connected with a conjunction may be separated
by a semicolon; thi s ties th e idea s together i n a special way (as here). Sep arating suc h sentence s wit h a comm a i s calle d a comma fault o r comma
splice, th e habi t must be avoided. (Di d you notice th e example? )
4. Les s relate d sentences are separated by periods. Thes e two sentences provide
an example .
5. Whe n tw o ideas ar e relate d t o each other wit h a subordinating conjunction,
they shoul d b e separate d b y a comm a i f th e subordinat e phras e o r claus e
comes firs t i n th e sentenc e (when i s th e subordinatin g conjunction i n thi s
case); otherwise, n o comm a is needed.
6. An d i t i s acceptable t o begin a sentence wit h a coordinating conjunction (as
here; use d mor e a s a conjunctive adverb) althoug h this practice shoul d no t
be overdone .
B. Modifying words.
1. Compoun d adjective s ar e forme d b y connecting with a hyphen : tw o adjectives, an adjective and a noun, or tw o nouns: near-ultraviolet radiation, a tenwatt lamp, cell-wall structure. (Bu t omit the hyphe n with numerals followed
by unit symbols: 10 0 W lamp.)
2. I n technica l writing , i t i s importan t t o us e adverbia l form s whe n a verb ,
adverb, o r adjectiv e i s being modified: a n unusually concentrated solution.
3. Noun s used as direct o r indirect objects or followin g preposition s ar e always
in th e objectiv e case , which in English is only evident when expressed b y th e
personal pronoun s me, him, her, us, them, and whom (o r whomever).
4. Althoug h some editors migh t disagree, authors would do well to use personal
pronouns in writing technical articles for the scientific literature: W e homogenized th e tissue i n a buffer solution. Fo r on e thing , thi s avoid s us e o f th e
186 Appendices:
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
CONSULTANTS
Ross E. Konin g Shirlen
Eastern Connecticu t Stat e Universit y Uta
Willimantic, Connecticu t Logan
B
STANDARDS FOR EFFECTIVE PRESENTATIONS
Ross E . Koning
Biology Departmen t
Eastern Connecticu t Stat e University
Willimantic, CT 06226-229 5 U.S.A .
As scientists working in a rapidly advancing discipline, we must communicate effec tively a t regional , national , an d internationa l meetings . Whil e publication i s th e
permanent record o f research progress , we rely heavily upon meetings presentation s
to communicate our most recent ideas and results. Ther e are two common forms of
meetings presentation : th e oral report an d th e poster. Thi s appendi x is primarily
designed to assist with the preparation o f slides for the oral report, but much of the
information applie s equally well to artwor k prepared fo r posters .
To communicat e effectively , ora l presentation s mus t b e designe d t o optimall y
deliver ideas and finding s within a timed interval (usually less than 15 minutes). T o
achieve this, the artwork prepared for an oral report must be quite different fro m th e
artwork prepared fo r publication. Slide s cannot have the finenes s o f detail nor th e
complexity required of publication graphic s (for saving precious space in journals).
Since an oral report lack s the luxury of long explanations and detailed study, each
slide (o r viewgraph ) mus t hav e a simpl e format , mus t b e fre e o f nonessentia l
information, mus t b e readil y understood, an d mus t hav e a single , clea r purpose .
Each slide must be visible, legible, attractive, and integrated with the other slides and
the oral presentation. I f properly designed, your graphics should catch the attentio n
of the audience , reinforce your spoken ideas, and make your communication easier,
faster, an d mor e exciting.
Presentation plannin g software for computers may assist researchers i n designing
effective graphics , but becaus e th e powe r t o desig n is still th e prerogativ e o f th e
scientist, som e guidelines are needed t o us e this software t o best advantage. Man y
examples of poorly designed slides generated by computer are evident at professional
meetings. Thus , the guideline s presented here should be followed b y those who use
computer graphic s facilities as well as those usin g older methods.
Clearly, slides must not detract fro m th e presentation, so a key word for thinking
about graphic s i s simplify! Yo u d o no t wan t you r audienc e t o wallo w i n th e
particulars o f your approac h bu t t o understan d your result s an d t o com e t o your
conclusions (literally to see what you mean). I t is important to keep methodological
188
190 Appendices:
that you have enough slides . I f you do not have enough slides planned to accommo date this change rate, then you probably hav e planned slide s that present more than
one idea! Thes e need t o be simplified. Walkin g into a 15-minute presentatio n wit h
five complicate d slide s assure s boredo m fo r your audienc e an d disrespec t fo r you .
This is particularly tru e for weary audiences afte r a few days of a national meeting .
On th e othe r hand , i f yo u alread y hav e 5 0 slide s fo r a 15-minut e presentation ,
adequate rehearsa l wil l hel p yo u decide i f you cannot presen t al l the slide s (ideas )
you may have planned. If , during rehearsal of your planned presentation, yo u cannot
remember a particular poin t yo u want to make , you need anothe r graphi c elemen t
that wil l remind yo u of what was important an d will help driv e this point hom e t o
your audienc e a s well.
Examine your presentation plan to be sure you have included title slides, question
slides, evidence slides, and conclusion slides. Chec k carefull y t o not e whethe r you
need duplicat e slide s fo r graphic s tha t ar e t o b e show n mor e tha n onc e i n you r
presentation. Th e audienc e ha s no patience fo r you to give verbal instructions t o a
projectionist t o tr y to locat e a previou s slid e i n a slid e tra y and the n t o retur n t o
another specifi c slide t o continu e you r presentation . Never turn back! Th e story board mus t be unidirectional !
B. Preparing the artwork. Artwor k mus t be designe d t o a 2-height-by-3-width
ratio, which convert s directl y t o th e 2 4 x 36-mm forma t o f the standar d slide . I t is
best t o kee p th e artwor k awa y fro m th e edge s o f th e fram e an d t o hav e centra l
weight to the figure . Colo r and lettering weight can be used to emphasize. Realiz e
that wester n audience s wil l view the slid e from uppe r lef t t o lower right, so items in
the uppe r righ t and lower left corner s o f the diagram are of less importance and may
go unnoticed i n a complicated slide .
Legibility i s a most-importan t criterion . Make it bold! Us e larg e fonts ! I f
your artwork outpu t i s on 8. 5 x 11-inch or on A4 paper, tape it to a wall and stan d
three meter s away . I f you ar e usin g a compute r scree n t o prepar e artwork , again
move thre e meter s fro m th e scree n t o chec k fo r legibility . A t thi s distance , you r
graphic ha s th e sam e visua l size a s a projectio n scree n viewe d fro m th e bac k o f a
lecture room . Ca n yo u stil l rea d everything ? I s the poin t o f th e graphi c clearl y
observed fro m thi s distance? I f not, then the lettering fonts , symbols, line thickness ,
or other elements o f the artwor k must be made larger or bolder .
As a fina l chec k fo r legibility , hold th e graphi c that ha s been converte d t o a 2 x
2-inch slid e 4 0 cm fro m you r nose. Chec k t o b e sur e you can read everythin g and
that th e poin t o f th e graphi c i s clearl y observed fro m thi s distance . I f not , the n
either th e letterin g o n th e artwor k must be proportionally large r o r the slid e mus t
be retake n t o mor e nearl y fill th e frame .
Legibility i s assured i f a fe w simple rule s ar e applie d t o al l graphic s use d i n a n
oral presentation . A Koda k publicatio n (Koda k #2 , 1986 ) i s a goo d technica l
discussion o f legibilit y parameter s an d give s excellen t tip s fo r makin g your slide s
readable.
Text. Eac h textua l graphic should be limite d to a fe w (less tha n 10 ) words. A
text slid e shoul d b e though t of a s a n idea-gram . I t make s your poin t dramatically
and remind s yo u o f wha t t o sa y withou t havin g note s t o handl e (o r shuffle!) .
Complete sentence s are seldo m legibl e o n a screen, so you should never hav e much
to rea d o n a slide . I f you read a slid e t o th e audience , yo u will bor e them ; i f th e
audience read s a slid e while you discus s it , the y are no t listenin g carefully t o you .
Helvetica o r other sans-seri f typefaces (suc h a s thi s one) ar e much more readabl e
in graphics tha n serif-fonts such as Times Roma n (lik e this) . Th e font siz e must be
tall enoug h s o tha t onl y 1 2 lines would fil l th e slid e area fro m to p t o bottom , an d
wide enoug h s o tha t onl y 36 characters woul d fill th e slid e are a fro m lef t t o right .
The fonts must be bold; the thickness of the lines used to form each character shoul d
be betwee n 1/1 0 t o 1/ 5 of th e heigh t o f th e character . I f these siz e guidelines ar e
followed strictly , then everyone, eve n those in the back of the conference room , will
be able to see what you intend t o show them. Thes e legibility rules appl y equally to
lettering on tables, graphs, an d other artwork.
Tables. Prepar e a slide showing onfy th e portion of the tabl e tha t you intend t o
discuss; leav e ou t unuse d data . Excessiv e ra w dat a an d particularl y unprocesse d
statistical table s ar e roadblock s betwee n yo u an d your audience ; you r audienc e i s
likely t o b e mor e intereste d i n plan t physiolog y than i n statistica l analysis . I f you
plan t o focu s onl y o n a fe w cell s i n you r table , the n reformulat e th e tabl e fo r
projection. Reserv e the complet e tabl e as a photocopy for private discussions with
interested conferees . Alternatively , reserv e th e complet e table as an informational
slide afte r you r fina l slid e a s potentiall y usefu l i n answerin g a questio n fro m th e
audience. Moreover , i f you wish to reac h a large r audience, a handou t migh t b e
desirable. However , i f you do have a handout, pass it out onl y when the tal k is over,
so the audienc e will be listening and not readin g during your presentation. B e sure
your name, address , an d phone numbe r are printed on the handout so a member of
the audienc e ma y contact yo u later fo r discussion.
In any case, table s for your oral presentation shoul d have no more than fiv e rows
or columns t o sta y within the limits of legibility and sensibility. I t is better t o divide
a large table into smaller portions o n several slides than to present an illegible smear
of tiny digits for several minutes . I t is important to note tha t graphs (line, bar, pie)
are usuall y far mor e illustrativ e an d memorabl e than number s in tables .
Line graphs should be bold an d legible. Man y computer graphics programs draw
axis and plotted line s to o finel y b y default an d need t o be modifie d fo r making bold
projection slides . Ther e should be no more than eight marked ticks on any axis, and
all lettering shoul d conform to the legibilit y rules for text (above). Again , computer
programs usuall y default t o smal l font s suitable fo r publicatio n but unsuitabl e fo r
projection. Ideally , you should show only one or tw o lines or curve s on each slide ,
but you may build up to a multiple-curve figure by revealing a new line on successiv e
slides.
Bar graphs should hav e no more than eight bars and, if stacked bars are used, the
bars ma y be (shoul d be ) reveale d sequentiall y or i n group s by color o r textur e fo r
contrast.
Pie charts shoul d hav e fewe r tha n 1 0 slices . Colo r o r textur e contras t an d
"pulled-out" slices ca n b e employe d fo r emphasis . Sequentia l emphasis in a slide
series ma y better communicat e your findings.
192 Appendices:
Colors can be used t o great advantage , but th e overuse o f colors i s only distracting. Th e ease of applying color i n computer-generated graphic s tempt s researcher s
to us e too man y colors. Wheneve r possible, associat e a color wit h a particular typ e
of information. Th e color s mus t contrast wel l in order t o b e distinguished. Ligh t
colors on a dark background are very legible. Dar k colors on a medium background
are seldo m appreciated . Extrem e contrast i s needed fo r partially-darkene d lectur e
halls, bu t i n fully-darkene d room s extrem e contras t fatigue s th e visio n o f you r
audience. Hig h contras t blac k and white positives and negatives will be more easily
appreciated i f dye d t o a paste l color . Thi s take s th e "edge " of f o f th e excessiv e
contrast. Thi s i s particularly important if you intend to mix black-and-white artwork
with typical color slide s or othe r continuous-tone artwork .
Do no t underestimat e th e specia l connotation s o r emotiona l impac t o f certai n
colors (Xerox , 1985) :
Red: stop
, danger , fire , anger , warmth, passion, excitemen t
Blue: police
, navy, sea, serenity , sky, fidelity, water, coolnes s
Green: go , growth , trees , country , spring , restfulness , youth , freshness ,
money (USA )
Yellow: caution , sunlight , cheerfulness, heat, light, life
White: hospitals , sterility , purity , innocence, peace , calm
Gray: somberness
, dignity , quietness, age, wisdom, gravity
C. Making the slides. A variety of techniques can be employed to conver t welldesigned legibl e ar t wor k t o effectiv e slides . Scientist s wit h acces s t o compute r
graphics equipment can generate slides directly from their computers. Severa l highly
sophisticated program s are now on the market to create beautiful, multicolored slides
(e.g., Harvard Graphics , Power Point , Slid e Write, WordPerfect Presentations, etc.) .
It is possible t o photograph thes e directly from th e screen although resolution i s not
as good a s when th e compute r fil e fo r the slid e i s sent t o a fil m recorde r designe d
to expos e th e fil m accordin g t o th e file . Suc h recorder s cos t a t leas t a thousan d
dollars (althoug h price s hav e been droppin g sinc e the y first cam e o n th e market) .
If yo u don' t hav e th e recorder , yo u ca n generat e th e presentatio n graphic s o n
diskettes tha t ar e the n sen t t o agencie s t o b e converte d to slide s (a t cost s around
$5.00 pe r slide. )
If th e compute r facilitie s are no t availabl e to you , or i f you haven't tim e t o g o
through the sometimes involve d process of using computer programs to produce th e
slides, yo u can use th e tried-and-tru e photographi c processes tha t everyone ha d t o
use before th e compute r revolution . Basically , these processe s involv e puttin g th e
graphs, tables , words , o r othe r material s o n pape r o r othe r suitabl e mediu m an d
photographing th e result s t o mak e slides . Suc h slide s ca n b e draw n b y hand o r
produced wit h suitabl e softwar e on a computer attache d t o a high-qualit y printer.
Often, th e Universit y or othe r organizatio n ha s a photography laboratory tha t will
make th e slide s fro m th e ar t work . Som e workers lik e to o r mus t go through th e
entire proces s themselves , usin g technique s describe d i n th e appendi x t o thi s
appendix.
One quic k and simpl e approach is to photograp h the ar t work , on a goo d copy
stand, usin g color slid e fil m (direc t positive). Thi s give s fairl y satisfactor y result s
even wit h black-and-white copy, providing that you remember to over expose b y 1/2 to
one full f stop s o tha t th e backgroun d wil l appea r brigh t instea d o f gre y whe n
projected. O f course , i f you us e color film , yo u can add colo r t o th e ar t wor k o r
even us e color filters when makin g the slides .
H. Showing the slides. Ther e is no replacemen t fo r adequate rehearsal o f your
slide presentation . I t wil l show errors i n you r planning, errors i n logic , error s i n
legibility, an d certainl y hel p you fee l mor e confiden t when you actually deliver th e
oral report at the conference. O f course, this rehearsal must begin sufficiently befor e
the conferenc e s o that error s ca n be corrected. Yo u should begi n t o prepare you r
oral report a s soon a s possible.
During rehearsa l b e sur e you r slide s ar e i n mount s tha t wil l functio n i n th e
standard Koda k Carousel 14 0 tray. Thi n plastic mounts jam less frequently tha n any
other type. Th e mount s should b e numbered so that if a stack of slides is dropped,
order ca n be quickly restored. Yo u should place a dot or an x in the proper corne r
of th e moun t s o tha t i t will be oriente d properl y at th e conference . Th e standard
convention fo r placement o f this mark is to hol d the moun t so that th e slide can be
properly read and to mark the lower left corne r of the mount. Th e projectionist will
then reorien t th e moun t so the mark is in the upper right corner. Thi s inversio n of
the slid e will assure prope r orientation o n th e screen. B e sure to check this orientation o f your mark during rehearsal!
When yo u trave l t o th e conference , carr y your slides i n a carry-o n bag to avoid
loss wit h your checke d baggage . I f your rehearsa l ha s bee n adequate , yo u shoul d
arrive, slide s i n hand , a t th e conferenc e confiden t tha t you r presentatio n wil l b e
organized, legible , an d understandable.
At th e sessio n fo r your presentation , arriv e before the beginnin g of the sessio n
to presen t you r (marke d an d ordered ) slide s t o th e projectionis t an d familiarize
yourself with the roo m an d its facilities. Brin g photocopies and maybe an overhea d
transparency o f eac h graphi c just i n cas e th e slid e projecto r fails . I f the projecto r
lamp burns out, you r 15-minut e time slot i s too shor t t o have the lamp replaced i n
time for you to finis h wit h slides .
When i t i s your turn to speak , remember never read a prepared speech. Ther e is
no more boring method o f delivery, and your audience unconsciously wonders if you
did the work you are presenting. "I f you did the work, then why must you read about
it?" Yo u shoul d b e abl e t o discus s the artwor k without a written text. Moreover ,
many auditori a ar e no t equippe d wit h readin g lights . Le t you r artwor k be your
notes. Never read a slide t o th e audience! Th e onl y thin g worse tha n projecte d
sentences i s projected paragraphs . You r audience thinks, "Why give an oral presen tation; jus t publis h th e work! " Grammaticall y correct sentence s wit h complicate d
logic and suitably condensed fo r journal publication are incomprehensible in an oral
presentation; us e simple, direct, conversationa l English .
Be careful in your use of a pointer, especiall y a light pointer (e.g. , a laser pointe r
that project s a smal l red dot). I t i s very distracting to a n audienc e when the ligh t
from the pointe r dance s or wave s around excessivel y on the scree n and especiall y
when it dances all over the room while you are talking but not pointing. Hol d it still
or mov e i t slowl y to emphasiz e what yo u want , an d turn i t of f when i t i s not being
used!
194 Appendices:
19
196 Appendices:
The poste r i s no t a "journa l article o n a board, " and lon g passages o f tex t ar e
completely inappropriat e fo r a poster session . Instead , the text elements shoul d be
largely idea-grams that lea d th e viewe r through the othe r graphi c elements to th e
conclusions draw n from th e research . Th e sequence of presentation ma y be similar
to a journal article, however .
A cop y o f the poste r abstrac t migh t be the firs t graphi c element afte r th e title .
The abstract puts the entire research body into a concise paragraph that a viewer can
read to determine whether she or he wishes to continue to examine the poster o r go
on to something else . Thi s migh t be the longest tex t element o n the poster .
A brie f introductio n presentin g th e backgroun d o f th e researc h an d perhap s
introducing the particula r organis m studied might come next . Thi s should b e very
brief and cover onl y the essentials . Thre e o r fou r sentence s woul d be a good guideline. A photograph coul d b e appropriate here .
Unless th e researc h detail s th e developmen t o f a ne w procedure, a n effectiv e
poster migh t simply include a flow chart rather than a long text explaining methods.
In many cases a photograph or drawing communicates what would take many words
to explain in text .
Most o f th e graphi c elements o n a poste r presen t th e researc h results . Thes e
graphic element s consis t o f photographs , graphs , tables , autoradiograms , etc .
Effective poster s frequentl y hav e simpl e figur e caption s o r title s declarin g th e
interpretation draw n fro m eac h accompanyin g graphi c element . Eac h graphi c
element shoul d b e larg e an d bold . Th e boundin g rectangle for graph s and chart s
might be 2 0 x 30 cm. Th e minimu m type size should be 30-poin t for al l lettering.
Graph symbols should approach 6 mm in width, and connecting lines should be 2 to
4 m m wide . Th e graphi c element s ca n b e slightl y mor e comple x tha n thos e
presented i n slide s fo r ora l presentations , bu t n o mor e tha n thre e line s shoul d
normally appea r o n a grap h (unles s th e figur e present s a famil y o f closely relate d
curves), and bar charts should be limited to fewer tha n 10 bars. Eac h element should
have a brief explanatory caption, bu t lon g passages are best avoided .
There i s n o discussio n sectio n o n a poster . Neve r wast e preciou s spac e o n
discussion tex t elements . Th e purpos e of a poste r sessio n i s to personall y discuss
your researc h wit h intereste d viewers . Thi s interactio n betwee n scientist s i s th e
beauty of the poster session . Th e verbal discussions cover the details of the researc h
and suggestions for improvements, etc. You r poster should provide the evidence and
support for the verbal discussion. O f course, the main conclusions will appear in the
abstract. Thi s i s important because som e viewers will stud y your poste r when you
are no t availabl e for discussion.
The las t graphi c elemen t i n th e poste r sequenc e should b e a summar y o f th e
research findings . A bulleted lis t i s sometimes effective; a concludin g mechanistic
model diagra m might be more memorable .
Very fe w viewers ar e prepare d t o writ e down a lis t o f references t o tak e hom e
with them , s o a literature-cite d sectio n i s generall y a wast e o f poste r space .
Established scientist s wil l kno w th e fundamenta l literature , an d a n intereste d
newcomer will write to you after th e meetin g for references an d reprints. Havin g a
business card with you migh t b e a hand y and considerate alternative.
Appendix to Appendix A
Photographic Techniques for Creating Slides
For thos e wh o lac k compute r photographi c facilitie s o r budget s fo r outsid e
consultants, Kodak' s pamphle t # 3 (1987 ) an d it s addition s (Koda k #4 , 198 2 an d
Kodak #5 , 1982 ) ar e helpfu l a s a n overvie w of th e proces s o f makin g your own
lecture slide s with simple and relatively inexpensive photographic techniques. The y
present som e o f th e option s availabl e t o mak e reasonable slide s fo r presentation .
Another Koda k pamphlet (Koda k #6,1985) is an excellent how-to booklet for several methods o f producing text slides. A small poster (Koda k #7,1987) review s film s
(and thei r availabilit y an d processing) , thei r uses , an d technique s fo r particula r
applications (text , charts, line drawings, prints, electron micrographs, chromatograms,
electrophoresis gels , autoradiograms, gross specimens , and lab scenes) .
Your artwor k wil l likel y fal l int o tw o categories : continuou s ton e an d hig h
contrast.
Continuous tone artwork consists of images containing various shades of gray or
various colors. Thes e ar e best rendered int o slides by photography with continuous
tone black-and-whit e (e.g., Koda k Rapid Proces s Cop y Film o r reverse-processe d
Technical Pa n Film ) o r colo r slid e fil m (e.g. , Ektachrom e or Kodachrome).
198 Appendices:
High contrast artwork consists of images containing only black and white or vastly
different shade s o f color. Thes e are bes t rendere d int o slide s b y photography with
high-contrast black-and-whit e film s [e.g. , Dektol-processed Kodalith , Technical Pan ,
or Precisio n Lin e (LPD4 ) films ] o r high-contras t colo r fil m [Vericolo r Slid e Fil m
(SO-279)]. Kodalith , Technica l Pan , and Vericolo r film s produc e a "negative" slide
of th e artwork . Th e dar k lines o n th e artwor k are clear o n the slid e an d the whit e
background of the artwork will be intensely black (black-and-white films) or intensely
colored (colo r determine d b y filte r selectio n wit h th e Vericolo r film) . Koda k
Precision Lin e fil m produce s a positive imag e (intensely blac k line s o n clea r back ground). A s mentioned previously , high-contrast black-and-clea r slides fatigu e the
vision o f your audience i n fully darkene d room s and should be dyed so that the clea r
areas tak e o n a light paste l shad e t o reduce contrast .
D. Methods for continuous tone slides. Koda k Technical Pa n Fil m 241 5 i s a n
incredibly fine-graine d negativ e fil m tha t ca n b e processe d t o variou s degree s o f
contrast (Koda k #8 , 1982) . I t therefor e make s a universa l fil m fo r al l sort s o f
applications. Wit h a POTA developer [1. 5 g l-phenyl-3-pyrazolidinone (i.e., Phenodone), 3 0 g sodium sulfit e pe r lite r distille d wate r use d fo r 1 5 min a t 2 0 C wit h
agitation], norma l contras t blac k and white negative s ca n be mad e fo r printin g o n
photographic paper . Norma l contrast blac k and white slides can be made by reversal
processing a s describe d i n th e bo x a t th e en d o f thi s appendix . Extremel y high contrast negative s fo r reversed-tex t slide s o r publicatio n print s ca n b e mad e b y
exposing th e fil m a t AS A 20 0 (1/3 0 s a t f/1 1 usin g 4 15 0 W photofloods ) an d
developing th e fil m i n undilute d Dekto l fo r 2 min a t 2 0 C wit h continuous slo w
agitation. Whil e th e reversa l processin g coul d b e use d t o mak e high-contrast ,
normal-text slides , LPD 4 i s a more convenien t alternative .
As note d above , colo r transparenc y film s (Ektachrome , Kodachrome , an d
equivalent) ca n be used t o make slides from artwork . Colo r reproductio n can be an
advantage t o distinguis h portion s o f pie charts , bars i n histograms, etc. However ,
standard blac k an d white artwor k loses some contras t with these films an d appear s
dark gra y o n ver y ligh t gra y background . Moreover , an y corrections an d surfac e
irregularities i n the artwor k will be visible in the fina l slid e because o f the low-con trast colo r rendition .
Color transparency film s ar e very useful fo r showing the plan t used, the method s
and equipmen t employed , an d your colleagues fo r the study, but tables , graphs , and
line drawing s from you r data ar e bette r presente d i n slides o f higher contrast .
E. Methods for high contrast slides. Th e best quality high-contrast negatives ar e
prepared fro m Kodalit h (o r similar ) graphi c art s film s processe d i n an y o f th e
Kodalith or similar (undilute d Dektol) developers. Thes e materials give an intensely
black background with very clear line-images . Th e film i s insensitive t o red safelight
and, therefore, als o to red or other faint-color guidelines on your artwork. Sinc e th e
contrast o f the fil m i s so high, corrections t o artwork made by clean erasure , white out ink , an d clea n correctio n tap e ar e invisible . An y undesirable mark s tha t d o
appear ca n be blotte d ou t o n th e negativ e with a n opaque ink (e.g. , fro m a perma nent-black marking pen) or special opaquing material available in photo stores. Th e
negative ca n b e printe d t o mak e publication print s or i t ca n be mounted i n a slide
mount for projection a s a reversed-text slide . A s a slide, the extreme contrast tempts
one t o dy e the fil m prio r t o mounting . Thi s is especially tru e when projection i s to
be in a small, completel y darkene d room . However , i n large auditoria wit h incom pletely drape d window s or "hous e lights" , the extrem e contras t i s highly desirable .
The very popular blu e backgroun d slides ar e made with SO-279 Vericolo r Slid e
Film (Koda k Pamphle t E-24) . Thi s i s exposed fo r 6 seconds a t f/1 6 through a n O
(range) "G " filter t o artwor k illuminate d by 2 x 500 W Photofloods held 1 m away
from an d a t a 45 angl e t o th e artwork . Th e fil m i s processed fo r 5 min at 3 5 C
in Unicolor K 2 Chemistry (or equivalent C-41 processing). I f you do not want to do
color photographi c processing , yo u ca n tak e th e expose d fil m t o a "One-Hou r
Photofinishing" company and ask for negatives only. Thes e ca n then be mounted i n
Pakon (o r equivalent thin-plastic ) slide mounts. (Th e company might do the mounting.)
In a pinch , you ma y substitute Kodacolo r I I (o r equivalent ) for SO-279 , expos e
it after metering a t the manufacturer-recommende d ASA, and have it processed fo r
negatives only . Th e background colors will be weaker and the printe d areas wil l be
slightly orange .
LPD4 Kodak Precision Lin e Film is a direct-to-positive film for making black-line
slides fro m black-lin e artwork. Th e fil m i s exposed fo r 1 0 s at f/9. 5 using 2 x 500 W
Photofloods a t 45 an d 8 0 cm from cop y center. I t is developed 1 min in undiluted
Dektol at 20 C with slow continuous agitation. Fix , wash, and dry as any other film .
The brilliant clea r backgroun d and crisp black lines of these slides mak e them suitable fo r us e i n a larg e auditorium , fo r us e i n wea k projectors , an d fo r us e i n
inadequately darkene d rooms . Thes e slides are excellent i n any projection environment. A disadvantage i s observed whe n these slide s are projected i n sequence wit h
color slide s o r other less-brilliant slides . Th e contrast ca n be painfully excessive ! I f
this is anticipated, th e backgroun d can be dyed to reduce contrast. I t is undesirable
to reduc e contras t ver y much, so very dilute solution s o f water-soluble dyes should
be used to obtain weak staining of the protein emulsio n (Frost, T.M . and P.A. Jones ,
1982).
F. Adding color to black-and-white slides. Negative s and slide s from black-andwhite film s ma y be dye d i n dilut e solution s o f water-soluble dyes. I sugges t one percent o r more-dilut e solution s of Tartrazine Yellow, Acid Orang e II , or Naptho l
Green. Addin g glacial aceti c aci d t o mak e the dy e solution 0. 5 % aceti c aci d will
improve th e uniformit y of th e staining . A brie f rins e i n wate r afte r stainin g will
prevent formatio n of opaque dy e crystals on th e fil m (Homer , J.A . an d C . Pennington, 1974) .
Individual line s o f typ e ca n b e emphasized , particularl y o n black-and-whit e
reversed-text negatives , by highlighting them with water-soluble ink from fel t markers
(e.g., Vis a Vis ) designed for overhea d projection . I f the marks are mad e on th e
shiny (backing ) sid e o f th e film , the y ca n b e washe d of f easil y an d reapplie d a s
needed.
G. Recovering from disasters. Farmers Reducer i s an amazin g treatmen t that
can eliminat e the exces s silve r in th e region s of a black-and-white slide or negative
intended t o b e clear . A n overexpose d o r overdevelope d negativ e slid e ca n b e
200 Appendices:
corrected by cutting silver from the film. Farmer s Reducer consists of two solutions:
Part A (37. 5 g potassium ferricyanid e / 500 mL water) and Part B (240 g/L sodium
thiosulfate). Thes e hav e a reasonabl y lon g shelf-life , bu t mixture s o f thes e tw o
solutions are effectiv e fo r les s than 3 0 min and, therefore , mus t be prepare d onl y
immediately before use . Th e standar d mixtur e is 1 part A with 4 parts B and 30
parts water. Th e slide, negative , or print is agitated i n the solution fo r as long as it
takes t o remov e th e unwante d silver . I f 30 mi n elaps e befor e completion , fres h
solution mus t b e prepare d an d th e proces s mus t b e repeated . Afte r sufficien t
clearing, was h th e fil m i n fiv e volume s o f water , dry , an d mount . Thi s simpl e
treatment ca n save you fro m havin g to repea t th e whol e exposure an d processin g
routine. It s availability also eliminates rationalizin g the use of a single substandard
slide fro m a roll of otherwise goo d frames .
There ar e intensifier s tha t migh t be helpfu l fo r correctin g underexposur e an d
underdevelopment, but I have not personally tried them. I guess I tend to err on the
other sid e i n an attemp t t o hav e very high contrast an d the deepes t possibl e black
areas. Th e intensifiers can increase th e contrast o f thin, continuous ton e negatives
but ma y be les s usefu l wit h slides .
REFERENCES
Frost, T.M. an d PA . Jones . 1982 . Do-it-yoursel f blac k and whit e slides. Bull . Eco . Soc . Amer .
63:16-17.
Homer, J. A, and C. Pennington. 1974 . A simple and rapid method o f adding color t o photographi c
projection materials . Southeas t Electro n Microscop y Societ y Abstracts .
Kodak #1 . 1975 . Koda k Publicatio n S-30, Plannin g and Producing Slide Programs .
Kodak #2 . 1986 . Koda k Publicatio n S-24, Legibility : Artwor k t o Screen .
Kodak #3 . 1987 . Koda k Publicatio n M3-106, Makin g lecture slides.
Kodak #4 . 1982 . Koda k Publicatio n M3-515, Makin g lecture slides: Workshee t #1 .
Kodak #5 . 1982 . Koda k Publicatio n M3-516, Making lectur e slides: Worksheet #2 .
Kodak #6 . 1985 . Koda k Publication S-26, Reverse-tex t slides .
Kodak #7 . 1987 . Koda k Publicatio n P-15, Koda k film s fo r lecture slides.
Kodak #8 . 1982 . Koda k Publicatio n P-255, Kodak Technical Pan Film 2415 .
Kodak #9 . 1984 . Koda k Publicatio n F-5, Koda k Professiona l Black and White Films.
Kodak #10 . 1983 . Koda k Publicatio n G-73, Koda k Precisio n Line Films.
Xerox. 1985 . Communicat e effectivel y wit h slides. Reorde r Number 610P153110. Xero x Repro duction Centers , Xero x Square , Rochester , N Y 14644 . (Ver y nic e bookle t put s muc h of thi s
appendix down i n an outlin e with color examples. ]
CONSULTANT
Frank B . Salisbury
Utah Stat e University
Logan, Uta h
c
GUIDELINES FOR MEASURING AND REPORTING
ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS FOR PLANT
EXPERIMENTS IN GROWTH CHAMBERS
Developed b y the American Society of Agricultural Engineers Environment of Plant
Structures Committee ; approve d b y th e ASA E Structure s an d Environmen t
Standards Committee ; adopte d b y ASAE , Marc h 1982 . Revise d Marc h 1986 ;
reconfirmed Decembe r 1989 ; revise d Februar y 1992 3.
Submitted by:
John C . Sager
NASA, Joh n F . Kennedy Space Cente r
KSC, FL, 32899-0001 U.S.A.
Donald T . Krizek
USDA Climat e Stress Laborator y
U. S. Department o f Agriculture, ARS ,
Beltsville, M D 20705-2350 U.S.A .
Theodore W . Tibbitts
Department o f Horticultur e
University of Madiso n
Madison, WI 53706-1590 U.S.A .
SECTION 1: PURPOSE AND SCOPE
1.1 Th e purpos e o f thi s Engineerin g Practic e i s t o se t fort h guideline s fo r th e
measurement of environmental parameters that characterize the aerial and root
environment i n a plant growth chamber.
1.2 Thi s Engineering Practice establishes criteria that will promote a common basis
for environmenta l measurements for the research community and the commercial plant producer .
1.3 Thi s Engineering Practic e promote s uniformit y an d accuracy in reporting data
and result s i n the cours e o f conducting plant experiments.
SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION
2.1 Th e aeria l environmen t i s characterize d b y th e followin g parameters : ai r
temperature, atmospheri c compositio n includin g moisture an d carbon dioxid e
concentration, ai r velocity, radiation, and the edge effects o f wall/floor on thes e
parameters.
2.2 Th e roo t environmen t i s characterized b y the followin g parameters : mediu m
composition and quantity, nutrient concentrations, wate r content, temperature ,
pH, electrica l conductivity, an d oxygen concentration .
2.3 Measurin g an d reportin g thes e variou s parameter s wil l b e covere d i n th e
sections that follow . Th e definitions of the parameters indicat e th e symbol and
units i n th e forma t (symbol , units) . Measurement s shoul d b e mad e tha t
accurately represen t th e mea n an d range o f the environmenta l parameter s t o
which th e plant s ar e expose d durin g the experimenta l period , t o indicat e th e
temporal variations , both cyclic and transient, and the spatial variations over th e
separate plants in th e chamber .
2.4 Th e definitions , measuremen t techniques , an d reportin g procedure s provid e
criteria an d promot e uniformit y i n measurin g an d reportin g environmenta l
parameters, bu t these guidelines should not be used to select the environmenta l
parameters applicabl e t o a particula r experiment . Othe r parameter s ma y be
applicable t o a particular experiment or special environments such as elemental
concentration i n hydroponi c solutions , pollutan t concentratio n i n ai r qualit y
research, and spectra l qualit y ratios i n photobiology .
2.5 Whe n measurement s ar e made , th e chambe r shoul d b e operatin g wit h con tainers an d plant s locate d i n th e chamber . Provisio n shoul d be mad e t o tak e
all measurements wit h minimum disturbance t o th e operating environment .
SECTION 3: DEFINITIONS
3.1 Radiation: The emission and propagation of electromagnetic waves or particles
through spac e o r matter .
3.1.1 Radiant energy (Q e, J): Th e transfe r o f energy of radiation .
3.1.2 Energy flow rate ( e , W) : Th e rat e o f flo w o f energy , a fundamental
radiometric unit ; also called radiant power.
3.1.3 Spectral distribution: A functional or graphic expression o f the relatio n
between th e spectra l energ y flux, spectra l photo n flux , o r fluence rate pe r uni t
wavelength, an d wavelength .
3.1.4 Spectral energy flow rate ( e y , W-nm" 1): Th e radian t energ y flow rate
per uni t wavelength interva l a t wavelengt h Y
3.1.5 Energy flux (E e, W.m- 2): Th e radian t energ y flow rate pe r uni t plan e
(flat) surfac e area ; als o calle d irradiance .
3.1.6 Spectral energy flux (E e,y , W.m-2.nm- 1): Th e radian t energ y flo w rat e
per uni t plane surfac e per uni t wavelength interval a t wavelength Y.
204 Appendices:
3.1.7 Energy fluence (F e, J.m- 2): Th e radian t energy dose tim e integra l pe r
unit spherica l area .
3.1.8 Spectral energy fluence (Fei, J.m-2.nm- 1): Th e energy fluence per uni t
wavelength interva l a t wavelength y
3.1.9 Energy fluence rate (F et, W.m- 2): Th e radiant energ y fluence per uni t
time. Th e sam e a s radiant energ y flux (irradiance) fo r norma l inciden t (perpendicular) radiatio n o n a plane surface.
3.1.10 Spectral energy fluence rate (F e,t,y, W.m-2.nm- 1): Th e radian t energ y
fluence rate per uni t wavelengt h interva l a t wavelength y
3.1.11 Photon (uni t = q ; i.e., one photon): A quantum (the smallest, discret e
particle) o f electromagneti c energ y with an energ y of hc/A. ( h = Planck' s constant; c = speed o f light; y = wavelength). It s energy is expressed in joules (J).
3.1.12 Photon flow rate ( p , q.s- 1 or mol-s- 1): Th e rat e o f flow of photons.
3.1.13 Photon flux (E p, q-m-2.s-1 or mol-m-2.s- 1): Th e photo n flo w rat e pe r
unit plane surface area; sometimes als o called photon flux density to emphasize
the unit area .
3.1.14 Spectral photon flux (Ep,y, q-m-2.s-1.nm- 1 o r mol-m-2.s-1.nm-1) :
The photo n flux per uni t wavelength interval at wavelength A.
3.1.15 Photon fluence (F p, q-m"2 or mol-m" 2): Th e photo n flow rate pe r uni t
spherical area .
3.1.16 Photon fluence rate (F pt, q.m-2.s- 1 o r mol-m- 2.s-1): Th e photo n
fluence per uni t time . Th e same as photon flux for normal inciden t radiation.
3.1.17 Spectral photon fluence rate (F ptli, q-m-2.s-1.nm- 1 o r mol-m- 2-s4
nm-1): Th e photon fluenc e rat e pe r unit wavelength interval at wavelength y
3.1.18 Light: Visuall y evaluated radiant energy, with wavelengths approximately ranging between 38 0 and 78 0 nm, based on sensitivit y of the huma n eye.
3.1.19 Illuminance (Ev . 1x): The luminous flux (light incident pe r uni t area) .
NOTE: (a) Radiation instrument s that measure illuminance are not recommended. The y shoul d onl y b e use d alon g wit h recommende d radiatio n
instruments for historical comparison , (b) Conversion factor s from illumi nance t o radiation ar e spectrally sensitiv e an d thus unique for each specified
source.
3.1.20 Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, q.m- 2.s-1, mol-q-m- 2. s 4 ,
or W-m- 2): Th e radiatio n i n the wavelength rang e of 400-700 nm . Measure d
as th e photosyntheti c photo n flu x (PPF), i n quanta.m- 2-s-1, or mol.m- 2-s-1
or photosyntheti c irradianc e (PI) in W-m- 2 for th e specifie d waveband , y1-y2
(400-700 nm).
3.1.21 Photomorphogenic radiation (q.m- 2.s-1, mol.m- 2.s-1, o r W-m- 2):
The radiatio n wit h wavelength s approximatel y ranging between 300-80 0 n m
contributing t o photomorphogeni c response s (i.e. , phototropism , flowering ,
206 Appendices:
1 %
1%
10%
5%
0. 1 C
0. 2 C
0. 2 C
Relative humidit y
Dewpoint temperatur e
Water vapo r densit y
Air velocity
Carbon dioxid e
2%
0. 1 C
0. 1 g.m'3
2%
1 %
5 %
0. 5 C
0. 1 g.m-3
5 %
3 %
H+ concentratio n
Electrical conductivit y
Salt concentratio n
0. 1 pH
0. 1 pH
5%
5%
Air
Soil or liqui d
Atmospheric moistur e
PH
0. 1 C
208 Appendices:
5.7 Carbon dioxide. Measurement s shoul d be taken at the top of the plant canopy
continuously durin g th e perio d o f th e study . A time-sharin g techniqu e tha t
provides a periodi c measuremen t (a t leas t hourly ) i n eac h chambe r ca n b e
utilized.
5.8 Watering. Th e quantity of water added t o each container o r average per plan t
at eac h waterin g shoul d b e measured . Soi l moistur e shoul d b e measure d t o
provide th e rang e betwee n waterings .
5.9 Nutrition. Measuremen t o f nutrients added to a volume of medium or concen tration o f nutrients added in liquid culture should be obtained at each addition .
5.10 Hydrogen ion concentration. Th e pH o f th e liqui d solution s i n a nutrien t
culture system should be monitored dail y and before each pH adjustment. Th e
pH o f the solutio n extracte d fro m soli d medi a should be measured at th e star t
and en d o f studies an d befor e and afte r eac h pH adjustment .
5.11 Electrical conductivity. Conductivit y o f th e liqui d solution s i n a nutrien t
culture syste m shoul d b e monitore d dail y durin g th e cours e o f eac h study .
Conductivity of the solution extracted fro m soli d media should be measured a t
the star t an d en d o f each study.
SECTION 6: REPORTING
6.1 Photon or energy flux. Report th e average and range over the containers a t the
start o f th e study , and th e decreas e o r fluctuation s fro m th e averag e ove r th e
course of the study. Th e source of radiation and the measuring instrument/sensor should be reported. Illuminanc e should not be reported excep t fo r historical compariso n i n conjunction with other radiatio n measurements .
6.2 Spectral photon or energy flux. Report the spectral distribution (graphical) and
the integra l (photo n o r energ y flux ) a t th e star t o f the study . Th e sourc e o f
radiation an d th e measurin g instruments should be reported.
6.3 Air temperature. Repor t th e averag e dail y readings with extreme s ove r th e
growing area for the light and dark periods with the range of variations over th e
course of the study.
6.4 Soil and liquid temperatures. Repor t th e averag e readings a t th e star t o f th e
study fo r th e ligh t and dar k periods .
6.5 Atmospheric moisture. Repor t the dail y average moisture level fo r both light
and dark periods with the rang e over th e cours e o f the study.
6.6 Air velocity. Repor t the average and range over containers at the start and end
of th e study .
6.7
Radiation
Photon flux
y1 - y 2 nm , with cosin e
correction o r
umol.m-2.s-1
(y1 -y2 nm)
or
W.m-2
(y1 -y2 nm )
n to take Wha
Minimum measurements :
at star t and finis h o f each
study and biweekl y if studies extend beyond 1 4 d.
t t o report
Average ( extremes ) ove r
containers a t start o f study.
Percent decreas e o r fluctu ation fro m averag e ove r
the cours e of the study.
Source o f radiation and
instrument/sensor.
Continued
umol.m-2.s-1.nm-1
(y1 - y 2 nm)
or
W.m-2.nm-1
(y1 - y2 nm)
Photosynthetic photon
flux, PPF,C y400 - y700 nm
with cosine correction o r
umol.m-2.s-1
(y400- y70 0 nm )
or
Photosynthetic irradiance,
PI,C y400 - y700 nm with
cosine correctio n
W.m-2
At to p o f plant in center of
growing area.
Minimum measurement :
at star t an d end o f each
study.
Spectral distributio n of
radiation with integral (y 1
- y 2) a t star t o f study.
Source of radiation an d
instrument/sensor.
At to p of plant canopy.
Obtain maximu m and minimum over plan t growing
area.
Minimum measurement:
at star t an d finis h o f each
study and biweekl y if studies extend beyond 1 4 d.
(y400- y70 0 nm )
Temperature
Air
Shielded an d aspirate d
(> 3 m.s-1) device
At to p of plant canopy.
Obtain maximu m and minimum over plan t growing
area.
Minimum measurement :
measure once daily during
each ligh t an d dark perio d
at leas t 1 h after ligh t
change. Desirable : contin uous measurement .
Temperature
Soil and liqui d
In cente r o f container .
Obtain maximum and minimum ove r plan t growing
area.
Minimum: measur e a t th e
middle o f the ligh t and
dark periods a t the star t of
the study . Desirable : con tinuous measurement .
Continued
a
% RH , dewpoin t temperature, or g-m"3
or
n to take Wha
t to report
At to p o f plant canopy in
center o f plant growin g
area.
kPa o r g-m- 3
Air Velocity
m.s-1
At to p o f plant canopy.
Obtain maximu m an d
minimum reading s over
growing area .
Carbon Dioxide
Mole fractio n
nmol-mol
At to p o f plan t canopy
Partial pressure
Concentration
Pa
raol-m
Watering
liter (L )
Substrate
Frequency o f watering.
Amount of water adde d
and/or rang e i n soil moisture content betwee n waterings.
At beginnin g of studies.
Nutrition
Soil media
mol-m-3 o r mol-kg-
Liquid cultur e
mol-L-1
pH
pH unit s
Electrical conductivit y
"USDA Nort h Central Regiona l (NCR 101) Committee on Controlled Environment Technology and Use , June 1978; Revise d b y ASAE Environment of Plant Structure s Committee , Oc t
1978; Revise d by NCR 10 1 Committee, March 1993. Publishe d in par t in th e following references: 1 , 17, 18, 22, 27, 28, 34, and 37 .
a
r
mS.m- 1 = 1 0 umho-cm- 1.
214 Presenting
Scientific Data
BIBLIOGRAPHY
NBS Technical Note 910-2. 1978 . Self-Stud y Manual on Optica l Radiation Measurements , Par t
1Concepts. Unite d State s Government Printin g Office, Washington , DC.
Norris, K.H . 1968 . Evaluatio n of visible radiation for plant growth. Annua l Review of Plant
Physiology 19:490-499 .
North Centra l Regiona l 10 1 Committee o n Growth Chambe r Use . 1986 . Qualit y assuranc e
procedures for environmenta l contro l an d monitorin g in plant growth facilities. Biotronic s
15:81-84.
Percival Manufacturin g Co. 1981 . Guidelines : Measuring and Reportin g Environmen t fo r Plant
Studies. Availabl e as a plastic card.
Rosenberg, N.J . 1974 . Microclimate : Th e Biologica l Environment. Joh n Wile y & Sons, New
York, NY.
Rupert, C.S . an d R . Latarjet . 1978 . Towar d a nomenclature and dosimetric scheme applicable to
all radiations . Photochemistr y an d Photobiology 28:3-5 .
Salisbury, F.B. an d C.W . Ross. 1991 . Plan t Physiology. Fourt h edition . Wadswort h Publishin g
Co., Belmont , California.
Sestak, Z., J. Catsk y and P.G . Jarvis , editors. 1971 . Plan t Photosynthetic Production, Manual of
Methods. Junk , The Hague, Netherlands .
Slatyer, R.O. 1967 . Plant-Wate r Relationships. Academi c Press, New York, NY.
Spomer, L.A 1980 . Guideline s for measurin g and reporting environmenta l factors in controlle d
environment facilities . Commun . Soil Science an d Plan t Analysis 11(12):1203-1208.
Spomer, L.A . 1981 . Guideline s for measuring and reportin g environmenta l factors in growth
chambers. Agronom y Journal 73(2):376-378 .
Thimijan, R.W . an d R.D . Heins . 1983 . Photometric , radiometric, and quantu m light unit s of
measure: A review of procedures fo r interconversion . HortScienc e 18(6):818-821 .
Tibbitts, T.W . an d T.T . Kozlowski , editors. 1979 . Controlle d Environmen t Guidelines for Plant
Research. Academi c Press , Ne w York, NY.
Tooming, K.G. 1977 . Sola r Radiatio n an d Yiel d Formation (Solnechnay a radiatsiya i formirovanio urozhaya) Gidrometeoizdat , Leningrad .
Zelitch, I . 1971 . Photosynthesis , Photorespiratio n an d Plan t Productivity. Academi c Press , Ne w
York, NY .
INDEX
Air, 7
temperature, 207-208
velocity, 205-208 , 21 2
Alanine, 89
Algebraic valency, 57
Aliasing, 12 9
Allele, 97
Allelopathic substances, 13 4
Allocation, 72
Allohydroxylysine, 89
Allometry, 11 1
Ambiphotoperiodic plants, 13 4
Ameliorate, 144
Amino acid residues, 85
Amino acids, 93
Amount of pure substance (mol), 5-6, 57
AMP, 87
Ampere (A), 5-7
Ampersand, 23
Amplified-fragment-length polymorphism , 97
Amplitude, 129
Anaerobic stress, 14 6
Analysis of variance, 32
Anamorphs, 25
And, 164, 168
Angstrom (obsolete), 14 , 18
Anisotropic growth, 11 1
Annual, 129, 134
Antecedent, 17 5
Anthesin, 13 4
Anthesis, 13 5
Antiauxin, 126
Anticodon, 97
Antiflorigen, 13 5
Antitranspirant, 151
Apex, 13 5
Apiaceae, 22
Apical:
cell, 113
meristem, 13 5
Apostrophe, 177 , 180
Arabic numerals, 5
Arabinose, 90
Arbitrary rules, 16 3
Area, 5, 9
Arecaceae, 22
Arginine, 89
As, 179, 18 1
217
218 Index
Asparagine, 8 9
Aspartic acid, 89
Asteraceae, 22
Articles, 16 9
Artwork, 188, 190, 192-193
Atmospheric moisture, 205-208, 21 2
Atomic mass unit (u), 83
Atoms, 7
ATP, 8 7
Atto (prefix = a), 8
Attributive adjective, 18 2
Auditorium, 19 9
Author(s), 23-24
Authorities, 2 3
Autocatalytic growt h function, 111
Autonomous, 121 , 124
Autonomously-inductive plant, 135
Autonyms, 23
Autotropism, 12 5
Auxin, 126
antagonist, 126
Average, 55
Avoidance, 14 3
response, 12 4
Avogadro's number, 7
(mole) of photons, 7 5
Axillary meristem, 13 5
CAPS, 92
Caption, 184
Carbohydrates, 94
Carbon dioxide, 206, 208, 212
concentration, 205
4-Carboxyglutamic acid, 89
Carotenoids, 9 5
Case, 171
CAT, 98
Catalytic activity, 93
Cation exchange capacity (CEC), 15 4
Caulescent plant, 135
Cauliflower mosaic virus, 97
Cause, 179
Cavitation, 152
cDNA, 98
CDP, 88
CDTA, 92
Cell:
freezing, 14 7
production rate, 111
Celsius (C), 7, 10 , 12, 14
Centi (prefix = c; nonpreferred), 8
Centimeter, 17
centimetergranvsecond (cgs), 3
Index 21
Central Limi t Theorem, 41
Centrifugation, 1 8
Centromere, 9 7
Cesium-133 atom, 7
CGPM, 3-6, 13, 17
COS, 3, 11
CHAPS, 92
CHAPSO, 9 2
Charge, 5 8
Chemical potential, 5 7
of water, 6 1
Chemical terms, 170
Chemo-, 12 4
CHES, 92
Chilling, 14 4
injury, 144 , 149
-insensitive, 144
repair, 145
requirement, 146 , 151
reversal, 145
-sensitive, 14 5
temperature, 14 5
tolerance, 14 5
treatment, 14 5
Chloride salinity, 15 4
Chloroamphenicol transacetylase, 98
Chloroplasts (plastid) DNA, RNA, 92, 106
Chromatin, 98
Chromatography, 17 7
Chromosome, 9 8
Chronogram, 13 0
Chronology o f isolation, 10 6
Ciliary movements, 12 0
CIPM, 3, 4, 12-1 3
Circadian:
pacemaker, 13 0
rhythm, 130
time, 130
Circalunar rhythm, 130
Circannual rhythm, 130
Circasemidian, 13 2
Circaseptan rhythm , 130
Circatrigintan rhythm , 130
Circular, 98
dichroism, 8 9
Circumnutation, 12 5
Cis, 98
Cis-Aconitate, 9 0
Citric Acid, 90
Class (classis), 22
Clause(s), 164 , 168, 172-173, 18 5
Clay dispersion, 15 4
Clock time, 13 0
Closed circular, 98
Clusiaceae, 22
Cm-cellulose, 88
CMP-NeuAc, 87
CMP, 88
CO2 exchange, 117
CoA(orCoASH), 87
CoASAc, 88
Codon, 98
Coding sequence(s), 98, 106
Coefficient, 6 6
convective transfer, 66
heat energy transfer, 66
of determination, 32
of variation, 28
Coherent unit system, 5, 12-13, 16
Cohesion movement, 121
Cold:
hardiness, 14 6
injury, 14 6
protection, 14 6
shock, 14 6
Collective, 180
Colon(s), 17 7
Colony, 98
hybridization, 98
Color slide film, 192 , 197
Colors, 192
Comite International des Poids et Mesures, 3
Comma(s), 11, 164-169, 172-174, 176-177 , 185 186
to group numerals, 12
Comma fault (or splice), 167, 176, 185
Commission on Plant Gene Nomenclature, 105
Common Names, 25
Communicate, 164
Communication, 161-162, 188
Compatible solute, 15 4
Compatibility, 98
Complementary:
RNA, 92
DNA, 92, 98
Complementation, 98
Completely randomized design, 33
Components of water potential, 51
Composition of solutions and buffers, 8 4
Compound:
adjective(s), 169-170 , 177 , 185
nouns, 178
numbers, 170
symbols, 11
units, 12 , 15
Computer graphics, 19 2
Concentration(s), 9, 56, 212
of metabolites, 15
Conclusion, 189
Conditioning, 143, 145
Conduction, 65
Conference Generate des Poids et Mesures, 3
Confidence interval, 29
for a mean, 29
for a proportion, 30
for a variance, 29
Conjugated auxin , 12 6
Conjunction, 164-168 , 179, 181, 185
Conjunctions of time, 167
Conjunctive adverb(s), 167-168, 185
Connectives, 16 7
Constitutive, 98
220 Index
Construct, 98
Contingency tables , 40
Continuous tone :
artwork, 197
slides, 198
Contractions), 177, 18 0
Contrary to fact, 18 3
Control, 12 1
Controlling elements, 9 8
Controversial o r unfamiliar names, 24
Convection, 14 6
Convective:
rate of change, 111
transfer coefficient, 70
Convention d u Metre, 3
Coordinate, 16 4
adjectives, 169 , 17 3
clauses, 16 8
Coordinated, 166-16 7
Coordinating conjunction , 164 , 166 , 168 , 176 , 18 5
Copy:
editors, 161, 16 3
stand, 192
Correlation coefficient, 32
Corrinoids, 9 5
Cosinor (polar) display, 130
analysis, 130
Cosmid, 98
Coulomb (C), 9 , 12
Counts per minute, 86
Covariance analysis , 3 8
CPGN, 106-10 7
Critical:
daylength, 15 2
nightlength l5 2
period 15 2
photoperiod, 135
temperature, 143 , 145-14 6
Crop growth rate, 116-11 8
Cruciferae, 2 2
Cryo-, 98
CT, 13 0
CTP, 8 8
Cubed, 1 1
Cubic:
decimeter, 1 7
meter, 12 , 16
Cultivar(s), 21, 25
Cultivated Plants , 2 5
Culture collection, 21
Curie, 8 6
Current, 7
cv (ab. for cultivar), 2 5
Cycles per second (hertz), 86
Cyclic salt, 154
Cyclitols, 95
Cyclonasty, 12 5
Cysteine, 89
Cytidine, 91
Cytokinin, 12 7
-like, 127
Cytoplasmic streaming , 12 0
Cytosine, 9 1
d (symbol fo r day), 1 3
DD (continuous darkness), 13 1
Dalton (Da or D, obsolete), 14 , 17, 83, 86, 98
Damping, 13 0
Dangling participle, 175
Dark break, 131
Dash(es), 166 , 173-174, 177 , 186
Data, 180 , 19 1
Dawn, 130
Day (d), 7, 12-1 3
-neutral plants, 135
Daylength or day length, 135
Deacclimation, 14 3
Dead, 183
DEAE-cellulose, 88
Deci (prefix - d; nonpreferred), 8
Decimal:
fractions, 1 2
marker, 4, 11
system, 3
values less than one, 12
Decimeter, 16-1 7
Decussate, 11 3
Definite article, 16 9
Degree(s):
angles or latitudes, 11 , 13
centigrade (obsolete), 10, 14
Celsius (C), 10 , 18 , 11 , 14
kelvin (obsolete; use kelvin without degree), 7
Degree growth stage model (GS Model), 14 6
Deep supercooling, 146
Dehardening, 143 , 14 7
Dehydration (desiccation), 15 5
avoidance, 15 2
tolerance, 15 2
Deka (prefix = da; nonpreferred), 8
Demonstrative pronoun, 183
Denominator (in SI units), 12 , 15
Density, 7
of dry (unsaturated) air, 68
2-Deoxyglucose, 90
Deoxyribonucleic acid, 98
2'-Deoxyribosylthymine, 92
Dependent, 16 4
clause, 16 6
Deposition rate, 11 1
Derived units 4, 5, 8, 12
Desalination, 155
Desynchronization, 13 1
Determinate, 13 6
growth, 112
Development, 113
Developmental arrest, 136
Devernalization, 13 6
Dia-(not transversal), 124
2,4-Diaminobutyric acid, 89
Diel, 13 1
Difference:
Index 22
between two population means, 30
between two proportions, 3 1
or change in the quantity that follows, 68
Differential thermal analysis, 14 7
Differentiation, 11 3
Diffusion coefficient : 58 , 87
of species/, 66
Diffusive resistanc e within a leaf, 67
Diflusivity, 63
Dihydrouridine, 91
Dihydroxyacetone phosphate, 9 0
Dinesis, 123
Diploid, 10 1
Direct:
address, 177
quotations, 17 7
Direction, 122-12 4
Diurnal, 131
Discarded metric units, 14
Discussion section on a poster, 196
Distance, 67
Divergence angle, 113
Divisio, 22
Division, 10-11, 22
DNA, 88, 98
DNPorDnp, 88 , 135
Documentation, 21
Donor, 13 6
Domain, 98
Dormancy, 13 6
Dose, 12 2
Double:
commas, 17 4
spaced, 18 3
Downstream, 99
Drought (including: avoidance , escape, resistance,
stress, and tolerance), 15 2
DTA, 147
dTDP, dTMP, dTTP, 88
Due to, 180
Dyed, 192 , 198
Dyes, 19 9
Dyne, 3
Dysfunction, 14 5
EC (symbol for electrical conductivity), 155
Ectopic gene, 99
Eddy diflusion coefficient o f gaseous species, 66
Editing, 99
EDTA, 88, 92
Effect, 17 9
EGTA, 88, 93
Einstein (obsolete), 7, 14 , 17
Electrical:
capacitance, 9, 58
charge 9
conductance, 9, 58
conductivity (EC), 147 , 155, 206, 208-209, 213
current 5-6, 5 8
impedance, 14 7
potential (difference), 9 , 57
resistance, 58
Electro-, 124
Electrochemical potential, 57
Electrolyte leakage, 147
Electrometric method, 147
Electron:
paramagnetic resonance, 89
spin resonance, 89
Electronic "balances", 6
Electrons, 7
Electrophoresis, 99
Electroporation, 99
Ellipses, 17 7
Embryo dormancy, 136
Emissivity in infrared region, 6 8
Emphasis, 176-178
Encoding, 106
Endodormancy, 136
Endogenous, 121 , 136
rhythm, 130-131
Endotherms, 147
Energy, 9
balance equation, 68
flow rate, 203
fluence, 204
fluence rate, 204
flux, 75, 203, 210
English, 194 , 195
classes, 16 3
system, 11
English-speaking:
editor, 194
fellow scientist, 195
Enhancer, 99
Enthalpy, 50
change, 87
Entrain, 133
Entrainment, 131
Entropy change, 87
Enzyme commission numbers, 107
Enzymes, 93
Epinasty, 125
Epithet, 23-24
EPPS, 93
Equilibrium:
constant, 87
velocity constants, 83
Equivalent (obsolete), 86
Erg (obsolete), 3
Erythrose-4-phosphate, 90
ESP, 155
EST, 99
et, 23
etal., 180
Euhalophyte, 155
Evaporative:
cooling, 14 7
demand, 15 2
Evocation, 13 6
ex, 24
exa, 8
222
Index
Except, 17 9
Exchangeable sodium percentage, 155
Exclamation: point(s), 174, 176-177
Exclamatory writing, 176
Exogenous, 12 1
Exon, 99
Exotherm, 14 7
Expected instrument precision and measurement accuracy, 206
Experimental:
designs, 32
error, 27, 39
unit, 27
Exponential growth function, 112
Exponents, 11
Expressed sequence tag, 99
Expression, 9 9
Extensibility, 63
Extracellular, extraorgan, and extratissue freezing,
147
F (symbol for farad), 9
Fabaceae, 2 2
Factorial experiments, 35
Facultative response, 136 , 139
FAD and FADH2, 88
Fahrenheit temperature scale, 18
Family (familia), 2 2
names, 22
Family, gene, 106
Farad (F), 9
Faraday, 12
Farmers reducer, 19 9
Felt markers, 19 9
Femto (prefix = f), 8
Ferredoxin, 89
Fibonacci sequence, 11 3
Figures, 18 3
Film(s), 198-19 9
recorder, 192
First harmonic; second, third, etc. harmonics, 131
First law of thermodynamics, 4 5
First person, 17 1
personal pronouns, 17 6
Flagellar movements, 120
Flocculation, 15 5
Flooding, 147, 152
Flora, 23
Floral stimulus, 136
Florigen, 127, 136
Flower initiation, 13 6
Fluorescence (including: initial , maximum, variable,
terminal), 76
Flux, 58
FMN, 88
Folding effect, 12 9
Foliar absorption coefficient, 6 6
Folic acid, 95
Fonts, 191, 195
For, 16 4
Force, 6-7, 9, 46
Index 22
Genome, 99, 106
Genus, 22-23
Geo-, 12 3
Geographical location, 21
German, 16 3
Germination, 13 7
Gibberellin, 12 7
-like, 12 7
Gibbs energy change (formerly F) , 8 7
Gibbs free energy (G), 47
Giga (prefix = G), 8, 10, 17
Global irradiance , 67
Glucosamine, 90
Glucose-1, 6-bisphosphate , 9 0
Glucose, 90
Glucuronic acid, 90
p-Glucuronidase, 9 9
Glutamic acid, 89
Glutamine, 89
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, 9 0
Glycine, 8 9
Glycophyte, 15 5
GMP, 8 8
Graft-chimeras, 2 5
Grafting, 13 7
Gram, 6, 10 , 17
Gramineae, 2 2
Grammar:
English, 164-18 7
as applied to SI units, 1314 ;
checkers, 18 4
Graphic(s), 188-190
elements (e.g., on poster), 196-197
Graphs, 191
Gravi-, 12 3
Gravity, 6-7, 17
Greek mu, 11 , 15
Greek symbols, 5
Growth, 11 2
analysis quantities, 118
field, 11 2
movement, 120
response, 12 3
velocity, 11 2
zone, 113
GSH and GSSG, 8 8
GTP, 88
Guanine, 91
Guanosine, 91
GUS, 99
Guttiferae, 22
h (symbol for hour), 13, 131
Half-cystine, 89
Half-peak band-width, 77
Halomorphic soil, 155
Halophyte, 15 5
Handout(s), 191 , 197
Haploid, 10 1
Hapto-, 123
Hard seed, 13 7
224 Index
Hygro-, 12 4
Hygroscopic movement , 12 1
Hyphen(s), 10 , 11, 14, 166, 170 , 177 , 18 5
Hyphenation, 178 , 184 , 18 7
Hyponasty, 12 5
Hypothesis test, 30
difference between two means, 30
difference betwee n two proportions, 31
mean, 30
proportion, 31
two variances, 31
variance, 3 0
Hypoxanthine, 9 1
Hz (symbol for here), 9
Ice:
deletion mutants, 14 9
encasement, 14 9
nucleating bacteria, 14 9
nucleation active bacteria, 14 9
nucleators, 14 9
IDP, 88, 137
IEF, 10 0
Illuminance, 204
Immunodetection, 10 0
IMP, 88
Impaction, 13 7
Imperative, 17 6
Imposed dormancy, 13 6
In (in botanical nomenclature) , 2 4
INA, 149
Incomplete sentence, 16 4
Indefinite articles, 16 9
Independent, 164
clause(s), 166 , 17 6
Indeterminate, 13 7
growth, 112
Index herbariorum, 2 1
Indirect object, 16 5
Induced, 121-122, 137
state, 137
Induction, 100 , 13 7
Infinitive, 17 5
Information, 18 0
Informational slide, 19 1
Infradian rhythm, 13 1
Infrared, 6 6
spectra, 89
Infraspecific taxa , 22-23
Inhibitor, 13 7
Initial, 11 3
Initiation, flower, 137
Innate dormancy, 13 6
Inosine, 91
Input signal, 12 1
Insertion, 10 0
Insertional mutagenesis, 10 0
Intensifies, 200
Interaction, 36
Intercellular freezing, 14 9
Intercept, 32
Interjections), 164 , 16 7
Intermediate-day plant, 137
Intermittent warming, 145
Internal stimulus, 121
International Bureau of Weights and Measures, 4
International Organization for Standardization, 4
International Cod e of Nomenclature fo r Cultivated
Plants, 25-26
International language, 19 4
International Scientific Unions, 93
Intransitive verb, 180
Intrinsic ice nucleator, 149
Introductory or final nonrestrictive phrases, 18 6
Introductory phrases, 17 3
Intron, 100
Intrusive growth, 113
Ionic:
charge, 81
effect, 155 ;
(solution) relations, 56
Ions, 7
Inversion layer, 149
Irradiance, 9, 75, 210
Irregular forms, 176
Iso-electric focusing, 100
ISO Standards Handbook, 4, 15 , 17
Isocitric acid, 90
Isoleucine, 89
Isotopically labeled compounds, 82
ISPMB number, 107
Italic type, 5, 11, 15, 17, 22-23, 25, 17 8
ITP, 88
Its, it's, 180
Joule (J), 9, 12 , 14, 18
Justify the right margin, 184, 18 7
Juvenility, 13 7
Kelvin (K), 5-7, 10 , 12
a-Ketoglutaric Acid, 2-oxoglutorate, 9 0
Killing temperature, 14 9
Kilo (prefix = k), 8 , 10
Kilocalorie (kcal or Cal, obsolete), 8 6
Kilogram (kg), 5, 6, 10
Kilohm (kCi), 10
Kilopascal (kPa), 14 , 18
Kinematic viscosity, 63
Kinematics, 112
Kinesis, 12 3
Kinetic energy, 66
per amount of substance, 67
Kingdom, 22
K-jugate phyllotaxis, 11 3
Kodak pamphlet, 19 7
Kruskal-Wallis k-Sample Test, 40
Krypton-86 atom, 5
L (symbol for liter), 10, 13 , 17
Labeled compounds, 93
Labiatae, 2 2
Lamellar phase, 149
Index 22
Lamiaceae, 2 2
Language conventions with Si-unit names and symbols, 13
Language problems, 19 4
Languages, 1
Lariat, 100
Latency, 12 2
time, 122
Latent energy flux, 70
Latin, 23
square design, 34
Lawn, 100
Lay, lie, 180
LD (long day), 13 1
LDP (long-day plant), 13 7
Le Systeme International cTUnites (SI), 6c Edition, 4
Leaching requirement, 155
Leaf:
area index, 117-118
area ratio, 116-11 8
conductance, 66
mass ratio, 116-118
plastochron index , 113
weight ratio, 11 7
Least squares techniques, 31
Legibility, 190-19 1
Leguminosae, 22
Length, 5, 7
Lettering, 190-19 1
Leucine, 89
Levels of authority, 4
Library, 100
Ligation, 10 0
Light, 204
break, 132, 138
growth response, 12 3
span, 13 2
trap, 12 3
Light-harvesting complex type I, 107
Like, as, 180
Line graphs, 19 1
Linear, 111
model, 33-34, 38
comparisons, 37
Lipids, 94
Liquids:
in gases, 5 6
in liquids, 56
List 177
Liter (L), 4, 10, 12-13, 16
Litre (British, French spelling), 4, 13 , 16
LL (continuous light), 132
Local:
control, 27
derivative, 11 2
Locomotion, 12 0
Locus, 100, 105
Logic in the English language, 163
Logistic function, 112
Long-day plant (LDP), 137
Long-short-day plant (LSDP), 138
Low temperature:
exotherm, 149
injury, 14 9
Lowercase, 9-10, 13 , 23
LPI, 11 3
LR, 155
LT50, 149
LTE, 14 9
Luminous intensity, 5-7
Lux, 8, 10
Lysine, 89
m (symbol for meter), 6, 14 , 17
M (symbol for morgan), 10 1
Magnetic field strength, 9
Main effect, 3 6
Malic acid, 90
Mangroves, 155
Mann-Whitney Two-Sample Test, 40
Mannose, 90
Magneto-, 124
Marking pen, 198
Mass, 5-7, 16
communication, 181
flow, 73
Masking, 132
Material derivative, 112
Mathematical entities, 11
Matric potential, 61, 62
Maturity, 138
Maxwell, 3
May, 180-181
MejSO, 88
Mean, 27
square error, 27
Mean Comparisons, 35
Duncan's test, 37
Fisher's least significant differenc e test, 3 7
Newman-Keul's test, 37
Tukey's test, 37
Meetings presentations, 18 8
Melting point depression, 150
Median, 28
Medium, media, 181
Mega (prefix = M), 8 , 10
Megapascal (MPa), 14
Megaplasmid, 10 0
Megohm (M ) , 10
Member numbers, 106
Membership in a:
plant-wide gene family, 10 6
multigene family, 10 6
Membrane:
fluidity, 15 0
permeability, 15 0
Menaquinone, 8
6-Mercaptopurine, 9 1
ribonucleoside, 91
Meristem, 113, 138
Merophyte, 11 3
MES, 93
226 Index
Mesophyte, 153 , 15 5
MESOR, 13 2
Messenger RNA , 92
Metabolic heat energy, 66
Metastable state, 150
Methionine, 89
Methods and results, 186
families, 10 6
family, 10 1
Multiple:
regression, 3 1
unit, 15
Multiplication, 10-1 1
sign, 24
factors, 1 2
(product) dot, 10
Mutation, 101
N (symbol for newton), 9
JV-Acetylglucosamine, 90
NADandNAD+, 88
NADH, 88
NADP, NADP+, and NADPH, 88
Names, 13,1 4
of units, 1 0
Nano (prefix = n), 8, 10
Nanometer (nm), 14 , 18
Nanomolar (obsolete), 8 6
Nastic movement, 123
Nasty, 123
National Agricultural Library of the USDA, 107
National Physical Laboratory, 4
National Institute of Standards an d Technology, 4- 5
National Bureau of Standards, 4
Negative, 12 4
exponents, 11-12, 15
Neither, 181
Nernst potential, 57
Net assimilation rate, 116-118
Net irradiance, 67 , 69
Nevertheless, 167
Newton (N), 6-7, 9-10 , 1 2
Nifplasmids, 10 0
Night break or interruption, 138
Nightlength, 13 8
NIST, 4
SP 811, 15 , 17
Nomenclature of:
sequenced plant genes, 105
traditional genetics, 10 5
Non-osmotic volume, 63
Nonrestrictive, 173 , 17 4
phrase, 17 2
phrase or clause, 186
phrases and clauses, 177 , 18 3
phrases or clauses, 18 6
Nonsense DNA, 101
Nor, 164, 18 1
Norleucine, 89
Northern blot, 101
Noun(s),22, 164-165 , 169-171, 181, 185
in apposition, 23
Nuclear DNA and RNA, 92
Nuclear magnetic resonance, 89
Nuclear-encoded genes, 106
Nucleic acids, 94
Nucleoid, 101
'Nucleoside, a,'91
Index
Nucleotide(s), 94 , 101
Nucleus, 10 1
Nuclide 12C , 13
Null-response technique , 13 8
Numbers), 4, 14
Number of photons, 75
Numeral(s), 11
to begin a sentence, 1 4
Numerical value, 4
Nutation, 12 5
Nutrient concentration i n plant tissue, 116
Nutrition, 206 , 208-209, 213
Nyctinasty, 12 5
Objective:
case, 171, 185
complement, 16 5
Object(s), 164-165 , 185-186
Obligatory response, 13 9
Oersted (obsolete) , 3
Ohm( ) , 9, 12
Oligohalophyte, 15 5
One-instant mechanism, 12 4
Opaquing material, 19 8
Optical:
density, 8 3
rotary disperson , 8 9
Optically activ e isomers , 8 1
Or, 164, 181
Oral:
presentation, 191 , 194
report, 18 8
Order (ordo), 22
Ordinate, 18 9
Orotate, 9 1
Orotidine, 9 1
Ortho-, 12 4
Orthogonal polynomials , 38
Oscillator, 13 2
Osmoregulation, 15 5
Osmotic:
adjustment, 153 , 155
coefficient, 6 3
effector, 15 5
potential, 61-6 2
potential gradient, 7 4
pressure, 61-6 2
shock, 155
stress, 156
Osmotically generate d flow, 73
Osmoticum, 15 6
Outline slide, 189
Ounce, 1 1
Overhead transparency , 19 3
Oxalacetic acid , 90
Pa (symbol for pascal), 9
Palindrome, 10 1
Palmae, 22
Papilionaceae, 2 2
PAR, 204, 213
Paraheliotropic, 15 3
Parastichy, 11 3
Parentheses, 23 , 173-174, 177 , 186
Parenthetical:
interrupters, 17 7
material, 17 7
phrases, 173, 186
Partial:
molar, 55
molar volume, 57
pressure, 212
pressure of gaseous species j, 66
Participles, 170 , 175, 186
Partition coefficient, 5 8
Partitioning, 7 2
Parts of speech, eight, 164
Parts per:
billion, 1 4
million, 14 , 18
Pascal (Pa), 9, 12
Passive voice, 176, 186
Past:
participle, 170, 175
tense, 17 5
Pause, 166, 177
PCR, 10 2
Pendulum timer, 132
Peptides, 93
Per, 10, 12 , 15, 24
Percent, 18 1
dry mass, 11 8
symbol (%), 11
Percentage, 18 1
by volume, 11
Perception, 12 1
Perennials, 13 8
Period(s), 132, 167, 174, 176-177, 185-186
Perfect, 18 3
Permeability coefficient, 5 8
Personal pronouns, 171, 185
Peta (prefix = P), 8
PFU, 10 1
PGD, 107
pH, 213
Phage, 101
Phase, 13 2
angle difference, 13 2
change, 138
response curve, 132
shift, 13 2
transition temperature, 150
Phenotype, 101, 105
Phenylalanine, 89
Phloem:
export rate, 73
import rate, 74
loading, 73
mass flux, 74
pressure gradient, 74
unloading, 7 3
Phobic response, 122
227
228 Index
Phobism, 12 2
Phobotaxis, 12 2
Phosphoenolpyruvic acid , 90
3-Phosphoglycerate, 9 0
6-Phosphogluconic acid , 90
Phosphoric acid residue, 89 , 92
Phosphorus, 94
Photo, 12 3
growth response, 123
oxidation, 143 , 15 0
Photoassimilate, 7 2
Photofraction, 13 2
Photograph, 19 6
Photographic techniques for creating slides, 197
Photomorphogenic radiation , 20 4
Photon(s), 7, 204
and energy flux, 207
exposure, 76
flow rate, 204
fluence, 204
fluence rate, 204
flux, 76, 204, 210
or energy flux, 208
Photoperiod, 13 2
Photoperiodic, 13 8
Photoperiodism, 13 8
Photosynthesis rates, 16
Photosynthetic irradiance, (PI), 66 , 77, 211
Photosynthetic photon flux, (PPF), 66 , 77, 211
Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), 66, 77, 204
Photosynthetically active radiation, photon basis, 66
Phototropism, 77, 123
Phraeatophyte, 15 3
Phrase, 164 , 17 3
Phylloquinone, 89
Phyllotaxis, 11 3
Phylum, 22
Physical quantity, 3-4, 10 , 18
Physiological drought, 15 6
Phytochrome, 13 9
far-red absorbing form, red-absorbing form, and
total, 77
Phytohormone, 12 7
Pi; 88
PI, 11 4
Pico (prefix = p), 8
Picomolar (pM; use pmol/L), 86
Pie charts, 191
PIPES, 93
Plagio-, 124
Plain-color (no information) slides, 18 9
Planck's constant, 6 6
Planned comparisons, 3 5
Plant:
growth regulator, 12 7
hormone, 12 7
or fungal material, 21
tissues, 7
Plant-wide family, 106
Plaque forming unit, 101
Plasmid, 101
Plasmolysis, 150
Plastochron:
index, 114
ratio, 114
Plastoquinone, 89
Plating, 101
Platinum, 7
Pleomorphic Fungi, 25
Ploidy, 101
Plural, 13
subject(s), 17 5
verbs, 17 5
Plurals of unit names, 10
Poaceae, 22
Poikilohydric, 153
plant, 150
Poikilotherm, 150
Pointer, 193
Poise, 3
Polar transport, 128
Polaro-, 123
Poly(A)- and Poly(A)+, 101
Polyadenylation, 101
Polycarpic species, 13 9
Polymerase, 101
chain reaction, 102
Polynucleotide, 10 2
Polyol, 156
Polysaccarides, 85
Pooled variance, 29
Population:
mean, 30
proportion, 31
variance, 30
Positive, 124
Possessives, 17 7
Poster, 188 , 19 7
abstract, 196
discussion, 19 7
presentations, 19 5
Post-translational regulation, 10 2
Post-transcriptional regulation, 102
Power (watt = W), 9
ppb, 14
PPj
PPi, 88
88
ppm, 14
Precede, 181
Prechilling, 139
Precision, 206
Precocious, 139
Predicate, 164
Preferred S I unit, 8, 17
Prefixes, 4, 8, 10, 170
Premature termination, 10 2
Prepared speech, 193
Present:
participle, 170, 175
tense, 175
Presentation(s) 188-190
Presenting scientific data, 16 1
Pressure, 9; 62
Index 22
chamber apparatus (theory of), 53
flow, 73
flow hypothesis, 72
potential, 61-6 2
Preposition(s), 164, 171, 179-180, 18 5
Prepositional phrase, 165
Primary:
event, 143 , 145
transcript, 10 2
Primer, 10 2
Principal, principle, 18 1
Printer(s), 184, 187
Probe, 102
Proceed, 18 1
Product, 10 6
Product dot, 11, 15
Projection screen, 19 0
Projectionist, 19 3
Proline, 89
Pronoun(s), 164-165, 169-17 1
Promoter, 10 2
Proof, 18 7
the final manuscript, 18 4
Proportional font(s), 185, 187
Protein structure :
primary, 10 2
quarternary, 10 2
secondary, 10 2
tertiary, 10 2
Proteins, 93
Proved, proven, 18 2
Proximal, 99
Pseudogenes, 10 2
Pseudoreplications, 2 7
Pseudouridine, 91
Psychrometric constant, 6 8
Pteroic acid (pteroyl-), 8 9
Pteroylglutamic acid, 89
Public databases o f plant genes, 10 7
Publication, 188
Publish or perish, 16 1
Published results, 17 5
Pulsed-field electrophoresis, 10 2
Punctuation, 163 , 164, 166, 168, 170, 172, 176
'Purine, a,'91
'Purine nucleoside, a, ' 91
Pyridoxyl-, 89
'Pyrimidine, a,' 91
'Pyrimidine nucleoside, a,' 91
Pyroglutamic acid ; 5-oxoproline, 89
5-Pyrrolidone-2-carboxylic acid , 89
Pyruvic acid, 90
Qualitative response, 139
Quantitative response, 139
Quantity of:
isotope, 59
substance, 7, 59
Quantum:
of radiant energy (a quantum), 66
yield, 77
230 Index
-fragment-length polymorphism , 10 3
Restrictive, 17 3
phrase, 172
phrase(s) or clause(s), 186
phrases and clauses, 18 2
Retardation factor, 8 7
Retinoids, 9 5
Revernalization, 13 9
Reversal processing for technical pa n film, 200
Revolutions pe r minute, 8 6
RFLP, 103
Rhamnose, 90
Rheo-, 12 4
Rhythm splitting, 13 2
Riplasmid, 103
Ribonucleic acid, 10 3
Ribose, 9 0
Ribosomal RNA, 92
Ribosylnicotinamide, 9 2
Ribosylthimine, 9 2
Richards growt h function, 112
Right margin, 187
Ripeness-to-flower, 13 9
RNA, 88, 103
editing, 10 3
Roman, 1 5
alphabet, 5
(upright) type, 5, 11
Rosette plant, 14 0
Round brackets, 17 3
Rules for botanical nomenclature, 21
Running, 120
phase, 120
RWC, 15 3
s (symbol for second), 6
S (symbol fo r Siemens), 9
Salination, 15 6
Saline: adaptation , adjustment, sodi c soil, and stress,
156
Salinity, 15 6
threshold, 15 6
SAMPL, 10 3
Sample size, 4 1
Salt:
-affected soil , 15 6
balance, 15 6
glands, 15 6
resistance, 157
tolerance, 157
SAR, 15 7
Sarcosine, 89
Saturated soi l paste, 157
Saturation:
extract, 15 7
percentage, 15 7
Scales, 6
Scarification, 14 0
Science, 16 1
Scientific:
paper, 161
writing, 16 3
Scion, 14 0
Scoreable marker, 10 3
Scoto-, 12 3
Scotonasty, 12 5
SDP (short-day plant), 14 0
SDS, 88 , 104
Seasonal cro p yield, 116
Second (SI unit, s), 5-7, 1 3
Second:
law of thermodynamics, 46
messenger, 10 3
symbols, 1 1
level sources, 1 5
Secondary:
event, 144-14 5
juvenile phase, 13 9
juvenility, 137
Sedimentation coefficient, 8 7
Sedoheptuose-7-phosphate, 9 0
Sedoheptuose 1,7-bisphosphate , 90
Seed-coat-imposed dormancy, 13 6
Segregational:
analysis, 105
nomenclatures, 10 5
Seismo-, 12 3
Selectable marker, 103
Selection, 10 3
Selective amplification of microsatellites polymorphi c
loci, 103
Self-inductive, 13 5
Self-sustained oscillations, 13 2
Semicolon(s), 167-168 , 176-177, 185
Semidian rhythm, 132
Sense-impression verbs, 17 1
Sensible:
energy flux transfer, 69
heat energy transfer, 66
Sensitivity:
of the human eye, 8
to chilling, 146
to growth regulators, 12 7
Sensory, 12 2
Sentence(s), 164 , 167 , 18 5
Sentence fragment, 164, 168 , 17 4
Sentences should not begin with numerals, 11
Sequence, 10 3
Serial comma, 176
Series, 17 6
Serine, 8 9
Sevres, France, 3, 5
Shall, 182
Short-day plant (SDP), 140
Short-long-day plant (SLOP), 14 0
Sialic Acid, 90
Siemens (S), 9-10, 1 2
Sieve-element/companion-cell complex, 73
Sigmoid growth curve, 112
Sign test, 40
Signal, 12 1
peptide, 10 3
Index 23
sequence, 10 3
transduction, 103 , 122
transmission, 122
Simple:
effect, 3 7
linear regression, 31
Since, 18 0
Since, because, 18 2
Single:
family, 10 6
leaf photosynthetic rate , 117
Singular: nouns , subjects), and verbs, 175
Sink, 73
Sinusoidal:
curve, 13 2
rhythm, 13 3
Sit, 18 0
Skeleton photoperiod , 133
Slash, 11-12 , 15, 178
Slide(s), 188, 190-192, 197-20 0
Slide presentations, 18 9
SLDP (short-long-day plant) , 14 0
Slope, 31
Snow mold, 150
So, 164, 182
...as, 180
-called, 18 2
Sodicsoil, 15 7
Sodicity, 15 7
Sodium:
adsorption ratio, 157
dodecyl sulfate, 104
Software, 188-18 9
Soil and liquid temperatures, 207-208
Soil-plant-atmosphere continuum , 153
Solar:
irradiance, 67
tracking, 123
Solids: in gases, liquids, and solids, 56
Solidus, 1 2
Solonchak soils, 15 5
Solonetz soils, 15 5
Soloth soils, 15 5
Solute:
flux, 62
potential, 61 , 62
permeability, 6 2
Solution concentrations, 1 6
Source, 7 3
Southern blot, 10 4
SP 811 (NIST publication) , 4
SPAC, 15 3
Space, 5
between numerals and units, 15
to group numerals, 1 2
Spatial sensing of direction, 12 4
Special Publication (SP) 811, 4
Species, 22-23
of plant, 10 6
Specific:
activity, 59
electrical conductance, 5 8
epithet, 23
growth rate, 116-11 7
heat capacity of dry air, 66
latent heat of fusion, 6 7
latent heat of vaporization, 6 7
leaf area, 116-118
leaf mass, 116, 118
rotation, 8 7
Spectral:
distribution, 20 3
energies, 1 6
energy flow rate, 203
energy fluence, 204
energy fluence rate, 204
energy flux, 75, 203, 211
irradiance, 9, 75, 211
photon fluence rate, 20 4
photon flux, 76, 204, 211
photon or energy flux, 207-208
Spectrophotometric data, 83
Spell checker, 18 4
Spelled-out unit names, 11
Spliceosome, 10 4
Splicing, 10 4
Split gene, 10 4
35 S promoter, 97
Square:
brackets, 24 , 173-174, 177
meter, 1 6
Squares, 11
Standard:
unit, 5
"gravity", 1 4
acceleration due to gravity, 8-9 , 12-14 , 17
deviation, 28
Standard error of:
estimate, 32
difference betwee n two means, 29
mean, 28
slope 32
Standards, 3
Statistical tables, 191
Steady growth, 11 4
Stefan-Boltzman:
Constant, 6 8
Law, 69
Step-up, step-down, 12 4
Steradian, 5
Stereochemistry, 93
Steroids, 94
Stimuli, 12 3
Stimulus, 121, 12 3
perception, 12 1
transduction, 122
Stock, 140
Stokes, 3
Stopcodon, 10 4
Strain, 21, 14 4
Stratification, 139-14 0
Stress, 14 4
232 Index
Strophiolar clef t or plug, 137
Strophism, 123
Style:
commas, 17 7
conventions, 1 0
manuals, 163 , 165
Subcooling, 15 0
Subject, 164-165, 173, 175, 185-186
complement, 186
Subjective:
complement, 165
and objective cases, 171
Subjective day or night, 13 3
Subjunctive mood, 18 3
Subordinate:
clause, 16 8
phrase, 185
Subordinating conjunction, 167, 185
Subspecies, 22
Substrate, 206, 209, 212
Subtraction library, 104
Successor apical cell, 113
Succinic acid, 90
Succulence, 157
Succulents, 15 3
Suffixes, 17 0
Sutfate salinity, 157
Summer dormancy, 14 0
Sunscald, 15 0
Supercooling, 15 0
Superoxide dismutases, 106
Superscripts (an d SI units), 11
Supplementary units, 5
Suppression, 10 4
Surface tension, 63
Susception, 12 1
Swedberg (not SI), 86
Symbol(s) 13-14, 17
Symbols for the monomeric units, 85
Symplastic growth, 11 4
Symptoms of injury, 144 , 146
Synchronizer, 13 3
Synonym, 24
t (symbol for metric ton), 13
T50, 151
T-region of Ti plasmid, 104
Tables, 183, 191
Tactic orientation, 12 2
TAPS, 93
Tau, 131
Taxis, 122
Taxon, 22, 24
Taxonomic groups, 2 2
TDP, 88
TEAE-cellulose, 88
dewpoint, 205
wet-bulb, 205
Template, 104
Temporal sensing of direction, 124
Tense, 175 , 186
Tera (prefix = T), 8, 10
TES, 93
Test of hypothesis, 30
Tetrapyrroles, 95
Text, 190
slide, 189-190
Thawing, 151
Than, 18 2
That, 172-174, 182, 186
Index 23
Transcript and transcription, 10 4
Transduction, 104
chain, 12 2
Transfer RNA, 92
Transformation, 10 4
Transient:
cycle, 133
gene expression, 10 4
Transit piptide, 10 5
Transitive verb, 176, 180
Translation, 10 5
Translocatable hardines s promotor, 151
Translocation, 72
profile, 7 3
speed, 74
Transmittance, 76
Transon, 105
Transport number, 58
Transposable elements , 98
Transposition, 10 5
Transposon, 10 5
Transversal, 12 4
Traumato-, 12 4
Treatments, 3 9
Tricine, 93
Triple point of water, 7
Tris, 88, 93
Tropism, 12 3
Tropistic movement, 12 3
True halophyte, 155
Tryptophan, 89
TTP, 8 8
Tumbling, 120
phase, 12 0
Turbulent air, 67
Turgor movement, 121
Twintron, 10 5
Two-instant mechanism, 12 4
Two variances, 3 1
Type size, 196
Typefaces, 19 1
Tyrosine, 89
u (symbol for unified atomic mass unit), 9, 13-14, 17
Ubiquinone, 89
UDP, UDP-Glc, UDP-GalNAc, UDP-Gal, UDPGlcUA, UDP-GlcNAc, and UDP-Xyl, 88
Ultradian:
oscillations, 13 1
rhythm, 133
Ultraviolet, 67, 89
Umbelliferae, 2 2
UMP, 88
Undercooling, 15 0
Underlining, 11 , 15, 22-23, 178
Unfamiliar names, 24
Unified atomi c mass unit (u), 8-9, 12-14 , 17
Unique, 183
Unit, 5
leaf rate, 117
name(s), 10-11 , 14
symbol(s), 10-1 1
Units:
used with the SI but not officially part of SI, 13
of concentration, 86
Universal gas constant, 6 7
Unnecessary words, 178, 186
Uppercase, 13 , 25
Upstream, 105
Uracil, 91
Undine, 92
Usage, 1, 163, 165-167
UTP, 88
V(symbol for volume, electric potential), 9
V(symbol for volt), 9
Valine, 89
Vapor density deficit, 15 3
Vapor pressure:
leaf and air, 67
deficit, 15 3
Variance, 28
components, 38
Varieties, 22, 25
Vector, 10 5
Velocity, 58
wind speed, 67
Verb(s), 164-165, 170, 173, 175, 185-186
tense, 175
Vernacular name, 25
Vernalin, 140
Vernalization, 140
Viability, 144, 151
test, 14 4
Viable, 140
Viewgraph, 188
Viscosity, 63
Visual browning, 151
Vitamin:
B6, 95
D, 95
Volt (V), 9
Volta, 12
Volume, 5, 7, 9, 16
flux, 62
modulus of elasticity, 63
Volumetric heat capacity, 66
VPD, 15 3
W (symbol for watt), 9
Water:
deficit, 15 3
evaporation site, 66
potential 11 , 47, 62
potential in the vapor state, 50
potential of aqueous solutions, 53
status, 154
stress, 15 3
use efficiency, 15 4
vapor, 67
Water vapor, 67
deficit, 20 5
234 Index
density, 20 5 Wor
Watering, 205, 208 , 21 2 Worl
Watt (W), 7 , 9, 12 Writin
Wave lengths, 5 , 8, 68, 76 WUE,
Wave number, 76
Week, 7, 1 2 Xanthine
Weight, 6 Xanthosine
Were, 18 3 Xeromorphy
Western blot, 105 Xerophily
Which, 172 , 174 , 182 , 18 6 Xerophyte
Which hunt, 17 2 Xylose
White frost, 14 8 Xylulose-5-phosphate
Who, 173 , 182 , 18 6
Who, whom, 173 , 18 2 YAC
Wilcoxon's Signe d Rank Test, 40 Year
Will, 18 2 Yeas
Winter: Yoct
annuals, 14 0 Yott
chilling, 15 1
injury, 14 6 Zeitgeber
Wish, 18 3 Zept
Word processing, 184 , 18 7 Zett
Words with special problems, 17 9
k (W), 9
d Directory, 2 1
g conventions, 16 3
154
, 91
, 92
, 154
, 154
, 154 , 15 7
, 90
,9 0
, 105
, 7, 12
t artificial chromosome, 10 5
o (prefix = y), 8
a (prefix = Y), 8
, 13 3
o (prefix = z), 8
a (prefix = Z), 8