Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By
1. A K Debnath*
2. S.K.Dubey**
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABSTRACT
India can not afford to restrict its growth on account of supply of energy. Coal, being the prime source of
energy in the country with a broader reserve base, has to take the major onus of increased energy supply.
Responsibility of fulfilling the coal supply requirement of the country primarily rests on Coal India
Limited(CIL). Further, this dominant status of CIL is likely to continue in foreseeable future. The gap between
the demand and indigenous availability of coal in the country has been rising. Presently, coal import of about
99 Mt is being made. The import requirement is projected to be 265 Mt by 2016-17 under business as usual
scenario and about 185 Mt under Optimistic scenario. This gap is likely to widen further beyond XII Plan
period leading to requirement of hefty import. In order to restrict the requirement of coal import, to the extent
possible, in coming years, CIL has no option but to raise its production level to a great extent by every
means. Coal production can not be started without possession of land, solving R&R problems, getting
Environmental and Forestry clearances as well as addressing the coal evacuation problems. Additionally,
issues like faster exploration requirement including drilling capacity augmentation, enhancing pace of
projectisation for existing and new coal blocks (out of 119 nos.), emphasis on coal production from
underground mines, etc., are required to be addressed by CIL for stepping up its production. Additionally, this
calls for meticulous identification of coal blocks suitable for mechanisation, increasing the level of
mechanisation in existing mines, introduction of state-of-the-art machines from overseas, establishing
indigenous equipment manufacturing capacity, ensuring optimal utilisation of the equipments as per
international standards, improving the working culture, etc. Manpower planning & development needs and
other requirements like skill development would also have to be made effective to motivate the workforce for
growth requirement.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.0
INTRODUCTION
Energy is central to development & poverty reduction measures and can be described as the
backbone of civilization. World's population is forecast to increase from six billion, currently,
to over eight billion by 2030. With this explosion of population and particularly, with the
emerging dynamic new economies, the pursuit of quantity-wise and quality-wise affordable
and reliable source of energy is presenting unprecedented economic, social and environmental
challenges. Finding ways to provide energy, those will lift emerging nations economies,
provide employment and boost quality of life across the globe, and to do so in a way which is
within the means of the common mass, is the major challenge before the energy providers.
Worldwide, coal is an extremely important fuel as it is most abundant and widely distributed
fossil fuel source and energy from coal is cheaper. About 29.6% of primary energy needs are
met by coal (source : BP Statistical June, 2011) and 39% of electricity is generated from coal.
About 70% of world steel production depends on coal feedstock.
The energy dependence on coal is more pronounced in case of developing countries like India
and China. In India, coal is currently the prime source of energy as it provides about 52% of
the commercial energy and about 67% of the electricity generation is coal based. The
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------* Director (Tech./Planning & Design),Central Mine Planning & Design Institute, Ranchi-31.
* Technical Secretary to CMD, Central Mine Planning & Design Institute, Ranchi-31.
2.1.1
The Integrated Energy Policy (IEP) document of Planning Commission (Aug., 2006)
presented several alternative scenarios of energy mix to sustain a GDP growth rate of 8% till
2031-32 where the requirement of coal based energy has been projected to vary from 1022
Mtoe (2555 Mt) for a coal dominant scenario to 632 Mtoe (1580 Mt) in the scenario
considering utilisation of full potential of nuclear, hydro and renewable resources along with
all energy conservation measures. Under another option for sustaining 9 % GDP growth, the
IEP document has assessed demands of 708 Mt (283 Mtoe) by 2016-17 and 1303 Mt (521
Mtoe) by 2021-22 indicating a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6.8 % during
2017-22.
The Working Group on Coal and Lignite for XII Plan period in its report has projected a
coal demand of 980.5 Mt by the terminal year of XII Plan i.e. 2016-17 as indicated in Table2.
Table 2 : Projected Coal demand in XI and XII Plan
Particulars
Total (Mt)
713.24
634.35
(in Mt)
Projected demand in
terminal year of XII Plan
(16-17) as per the WG for
XII Plan period (draft
report)
980.5
Customer / sector
Power Utility
Power Captive incl. fert.
Cement
Sponge Iron
Others
Total non-coking
Coking
Total
Demand in % of total
demand
69.6
5.7
4.8
5.1
7.9
913.3
67.2**
980.5
93.2
6.9
100
Based on projection of 17th Electric Power Survey for energy requirement of 1392 BU in 2016-17 and past trend of 70% of coal
based thermal energy requirement in the total thermal energy requirement..
**
2.1.2
COAL AVAILABILITY
Table 4 indicates the coal production during the X and XI plan periods Table-4 :Coal Production in India
Coal Producers
CIL
SCCL
Other PSUs
Total PSUs
Tata Steel & Captive Blocks
Meghalaya
Total Others
ALL INDIA
UG
OC
Total
Coking
Non-Coking
TOTAL
(Figs. in Mt)
Actual production during XI plan
2007-08
2011-12
379.46
435.83
40.60
52.21
2.11
2.71
422.17
490.75
28.38
41.98
6.54
7.21
34.92
49.19
457.08
539.94
58.90
51.83
398.18
488.11
457.08
539.94
34.46
51.65
422.63
488.29
457.08
539.94
CAGR 4.35% in X Plan period
Table5 indicates the coal production projection in 2016-17 by the Working Group on Coal
and Lignite for the XII five year plan.
Table-5 :Coal Production projection
Particulars
Projected coal production (Mt)
Delivering of requisite clearances within specified time schedule and addressing issues affecting
land acquisition, R&R, law & order and infrastructures for coal evacuation, effectively, in a time
bound manner have been spelt out as the conditions under the Optimistic scenario for the
envisaged production of 795 Mt by 2016-17. Contribution from CIL in this projected production
would be 615 Mt. However, it has also been projected that the production may reduce to a level
of 715 Mt in the country by 2016-17 if the requisite clearances and issues affecting land
acquisition, R&R, law & order and infrastructures for coal evacuation are not delivered in time.
CIL production in such condition (Business as usual) would be about 556 Mt.
2.1.3
Exhibit 1.
Note : Import figure of 2011-12 is provisional.
Production under the Optimistic scenario would result in a demand-indigenous availability gap
of about 185 Mt which may rise to a level of about 265 Mt in the Business As Usual scenario.
Furthermore, the demand-indigenous availability gap projected for 2016-17 would rise further
during successive plan periods. This necessitates immediate strategy to augment the coal
production to the extent possible to reduce the gap and import requirement. CIL, being the major
coal producer, and supplier of over 40% of the commercial energy of the country has to come
out with pro-active strategies for enhancing its coal production level.
4
3.1
Type of blocks
Blocks for bidding
Non-CIL blocks
Addl. CIL Blocks allowed to be retained by CIL
De-allocated blocks offered to CIL
XII Plan Projects
CIL Blocks
No. of
blocks
37
68
116
2
13
79
Estimated Meterage
(lakh meter)
13.70
19.03
24.25
0.38
1.16
10.79
5
Total
315
69.31
However, to sustain the programme of detailed exploration beyond XII Plan at an enhanced
rate of drilling of over 10 lakh meter per annum will need the commensurate enhancement
in the efforts on Regional/Promotional exploration.
Exhibit 2
Exhibit-2 indicates the reduction in importance of underground mining in CIL in the total
production scenario where the underground performance has dwindling trend over the years.
However, the limited shallow depth reserves amenable to opencast mining are likely to be
exhausted in foreseeable future (may be after 25-30 years) and the production from opencast
coal mines in CIL may reach a plateau. The resulting imbalance in production can not be set
right as large scale production suddenly is not possible from underground mines. Also, the
gestation period in case of underground mines is generally more in case of underground projects.
The reply lies in introduction of bulk production technologies in underground mines on urgent
basis as planning, execution and adaptation will take considerable time. Though, the efforts in
late 1970s and early 1980s of introduction of Power Support Longwall in CIL mines on a large
scale could not be successful due to various reasons, it became very successful in China. In
comparison to 400 longwall faces and an estimated 2.5 million tonnes of coal production per
unit per annum in China, India has only a few longwall faces with a very low production.
Status of initiatives taken by CIL for mechanisation and production enhancement efforts in
the recent past are indicated below :
Continuous Miners (CMs) have been presently deployed 7 mines of CIL with a total
capacity of 2.78 Mty as indicated below in Table 7
Table-7
Subsidiary
Company
ECL
WCL
SECL
No of
mines
2
2
4
Table-8
Subsidiary
Company
ECL
BCCL
CCL
No. of
Mines
2
1
3
WCL
SECL
MCL
Total CIL
19
Identified list of mines/ projects where Continuous Miner can be deployed on hiring
basis (potential blocks but further study is needed prior to finalisation) are Table 9
Subsidiary
Company
ECL
BCCL
No. of possible
CMs
2
4
CCL
Total CIL
Work orders have already been issued to MDOs to operate five mines (Jhanjra in
ECL, Kapuria, Moonidih (both XV & XVI seam), and Muraidih in BCCL) by
longwall technology. Likely capacity addition from these mines will be around 8.9
Mty. Several such mines are in pipe line.
Table-10
Sub. Company
Name of the Mines
Capacity (Mty)
BCCL
Moonidih XVI
0.7
BCCL
Moonidih XV
2.5
BCCL
Kapuria
2.0
BCCL
Muraidih
2.0
ECL
Jhanjra
1.7
Total
8.9
Efforts are also being made to identify suitable prospective sites for application of
Highwall Mining which is a mining method to extract coal from an exposed coal
seam at the terminating line of an opencast mine. Coal is extracted by driving a
series of parallel entries from the high wall up to a significant depth within the coal
horizon. This technology allows recovery of coal blocked in the batter in opencast
projects. At present, this technology has been implemented in Sharda Opencast
project of SECL.
Geo-mining condition of Indian coal deposits has been the major reason responsible for this
lacklustre performance in coal production from UG mines. Apart from the successful
8
Planning of all new mines with higher degree of mechanisation i.e. with Longwall, Cont.
Miners, etc. wherever applicable.
Separate cadre in CIL for Underground mining with attractive avenues to motivate for
performance.
CIL
Non-CIL / Captive
Total
26
110.0
20
97.5
46
207.5
23.17
86.83
0
97.5
23.17
184.33
41
23
64
Capacity (Mty)
86.0
5.0*
91.0
4.44
0*
4.44
86.0
5.0*
91.0
No. of blocks
Capacity (Mty)
33
156.89
31
227.70
64
384.59
59.74
152.32
196.56
59.74
348.88
IB-VALLEY COALFIELD
No. of blocks
Capacity (Mty)
Existing Production (Mty)
23
138.77
44.34
18
74.65
0.50*
41
213.42
44.84
118.19
73.50
191.69
No. of blocks
Capacity (Mty)
Existing Production (Mty)
Future Production (Mty)
MAND RAIGARH COALFIELD
No. of blocks
TALCHER COALFIELD
As per the Master Plan of North Karanpura coalfield, construction of railway lines and
electric power arrangement will require about Rs. 2500 crore of investment. Similarly, as
per the Master Plan of Ib Valley coalfield, establishing rail network for MCL projects will
require about Rs. 470 crores. Considering the necessity of infrastructure development in the
coalfields in entirety, there needs to be a mechanism of joint sharing of the investment
requirement in these infrastructures between CIL and the existing and future captive
9
producers. There may be a case where CIL can invest initially and which may be shared at
later stage by other users including captive parties.
3.2
3.2.1
LABOUR LAWS
Coal mining sector should be allowed to have exemption from provisions u/s 10 of Contract
Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970 (Prohibition of employment of contract labour).
3.2.2
3.2.3
Strengthening of land and R&R Department at all levels of CIL for timely action and
follow up with State authorities.
Obtaining ToR from MOEF for each and every proposal specially when more than 86%
conditions are common for OCP & U/G mines. Thereby leading to repeatation of the
process.
Delayed Public Hearing and issuance of PH proceedings by SPCB. The time limit
prescribed for public consultation/hearing, including receipt of proceedings, is although 45
days but the time taken is much more and in some cases, it is even more than 2-3 years.
Linking of EC with FC.
Standard ToR for OC and UG mines should be circulated by MoEF so that baseline data
generation and preparation of EIA/EMP is taken up without going in for ToR presentation
at MoEF and obtaining ToR .
Dispensation of public hearing in case of projects already having EC and fresh EC is
required because of increase in production only without involving any increase in land
area).
Dispensation of public hearing in case of projects having only forest land.
Dispensation of public hearing in case of UG projects as there is negligible environment
degradation.
If SBCB does not complete PH process within stipulated time, MoEF should accept the
EIA/EMP for EC. The EC may however be accorded only after the recommendation of
SPCB thorough PH proceedings.
Delinking of EC with FC as long as no forest land is used for mining and mining related
activities.
Coalfield wise EC so that the excess production by any project does not attract the
requirement of fresh EC as long as the combined production is within the EC capacity.
Once the FC application is received by the State Forest authority from the project proponent,
all the deficiencies in the application should be informed to the applicant at a time preferably
within 2-3 days. The process of the scrutiny should be very transparent so as to avoid and
identify the delay and also to pin point the responsibility. The deficiencies should be
resolved by mutual discussion within 15 days.
State should maintain the correct and updated record of the forest land to avoid
resubmission.
State should ensure its recommendations to MoEF in a time bound framework as per
Forest (Conservation) Rules.
After the stage -1 clearance is accorded, the proponent should be allowed to start the
activities and the forest land should be transferred once the required payments towards
NPV, compensatory afforestation is made by the coal companies to the concerned State
Government.
11
4.0
Strengthening of land and R&R Department at all levels of CIL for timely action and
follow up with State authorities.
CONCLUSION
From the above, it can be construed that the appetite for energy in the world is growing,
particularly in developing countries like India, as it is fast on course to industrialization and
urbanization. Onus of fulfilling the coal supply requirement of the country primarily rests on
CIL. CIL is likely to remain as a dominant player in Indian coal industry in foreseeable
future also. In order to restrict the gap between demand and indigenous coal availability to
further rise, the extent possible, in coming years, CIL has no option but to raise its
production level to a great extent by every means. Coal production can not be started
without possession of land, solving R&R problems, getting Environmental and Forestry
clearances as well as addressing the coal evacuation problems. Additionally, issues like
faster exploration requirement including drilling capacity augmentation, enhancing pace of
projectisation for existing and new coal blocks(out of 119 nos.), emphasis on coal
production from underground mines, etc., are required to be addressed by CIL for stepping
up its production.
The views expressed in this paper are those of the author only and not necessarily of CMPDI.
12