Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
0 AN INTRODUCTORY NOTE
1.1 GENERAL
Wind flow generation is on account of atmospheric pressure differentials and
manifests itself into various forms, such as,
Gales and monosonic winds
Cyclones/Hurricanes/Typhoons
Tornados
Thunderstorms
Localised storms
Photographs in figure-1 depict some of these storms.
Friction from the earth's surface leads to 'boundary layer' flow, but characteristics
of flow vary depending upon the storm type
.
1. Water submergence; 2,3,4,5. Wall damage and roof blown away; 6. Tower collapse, 7.
Failure of a tower; 8. Uprooted tree damages nearby building
averaging time. Smaller the averaging interval, greater is the magnitude of the wind
speed.
4.3.2.2 Variation of wind speed with height for different terrains (k 2 factor) Table 2
gives multiplying factor (k2) by which the basic wind speed given in Fig. 1 shall be
multiplied to obtain the wind speed at different heights, in each terrain category.
4.3.2.3 Terrain categories in relation to the direction of wind As also mentioned in
4.3.2.1, the terrain category used in the design of a structure may vary depending on
the direction of wind under consideration. Where sufficient meteorological information is
available, the basic wind speed may be varied for specific wind directions
4.3.2.4 - Changes in terrain categories The speed profile for a given terrain category
does not develop to full height immediately with the commencement of that terrain
category but develops gradually to height (hx) which increases with the fetch or upwind
distance (x).
a) Fetch and developed height relationship The relation between the developed
height (hx) and the fetch length (x) for wind-flow over each of the four terrain categories
may be taken as given in Table 3.
b) For structures of heights greater than the developed height (hx) in Table 3, the speed
profile may be determined in accordance with the following:
(i) The less or least rough terrain, or
(ii) The method described in Appendix B
The basic wind speed Vb given in Fig. 1 takes account of the general level of site above
sea level. This does not allow for local topographic features such as hills, valleys, cliffs,
escarpments, or ridges, which can significantly affect the wind speed in their vicinity.
The effect of topography is to accelerate wind near the summits of hills or crests of
cliffs, escarpments or ridges and decelerate the wind in valleys or near the foot of cliffs,
steep escarpments, or ridges.
4.3.3.1 The effect of topography will be significant at a site when the upwind slope ()
is greater than about 3o, and below that, the value of k3 may be taken to be equal to 1.0.
The value of k3 is confined in the range of 1.0 to 1.36 for slopes greater than 3 o. A
method of evaluating the value of k3 for values greater than 1.0 is given in Appendix C. It
may be noted that the value of k3 varies with height above ground level, at a maximum
near the ground, and reducing to 1.0 at higher levels, for hill slope in excess of 17o.
1.30
Industrial structures
1.15
1.00
(triangular, square, rectangular) a factor of 0.90 may be used on the design wind
pressure. For circular or near circular forms this factor may be taken as 1.0.
For the cyclone affected regions also, the factor Kd shall be taken as 1.0.
necessary to consider the possibility of the internal pressure being positive or negative.
Two design conditions shall be examined, one with an internal pressure coefficient of
+0.2 and other with an internal pressure coefficient of 0.2.
The internal pressure coefficient is algebraically added to the external pressure
coefficient and the analysis which indicates greater distress of the member, shall be
adopted. In most situations a simple inspection of the sign of external pressure will at
once indicate the proper sign of the internal pressure coefficient to be taken for design.
Buildings with medium and large openings -Buildings with medium and large openings
may also exhibit either positive or negative internal pressure depending upon the
direction of wind. Buildings with medium
Buildings with one open side or openings exceeding 20 percent of the wall area may be
assumed to be subjected to internal positive pressure or suction similar to those for
buildings with large openings. A few examples of buildings with one-sided openings are
shown in Fig.2 indicating values of internal pressure coefficients with respect to the
direction of wind.
In buildings with roofs but no walls, the roofs will be subjected to pressure from both
inside and outside .
6.0 PROBLEMS
7.0 CONCLUSION
Wind has two aspects. The first - a beneficial one - is that its energy can be utilized to generate power, sail
boats and cool down the temperature on a hot day. The other - a parasitic one - is that it loads any and every
object that comes in its way. The latter is the aspect an engineer is concerned with, since the load caused has
to be sustained by a structure with the specified safety. All civil and industrial structures above ground have
thus to be designed to resist wind loads. This introductory note is concerning the aspect of wind engineering
dealing with civil engineering structures.
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Ahmad, Shakeel, Wind pressures on low rise hip roof buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, Civil Engineering Department,
University of Roorkee (Now Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee), May 2000.
2. Bailey, P.A., and Kwok, K.C.S., Interference Excitation of Twin Tall Buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and
Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 21, 1985, pp. 323338.
3. Bayar, D.C., Drag coefficients of latticed towers. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 112, 1986, pp.
417430.
4. Bowen, A.J., The prediction of mean wind speeds above simple 2D hill shape. Journal of Wind Engineering and
Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 15, 1983, pp 259220.
5. Cook, N.J., The designers guide to wind loading of building structures Part 1. Butterworths, London, 1985.
6. Davenport, A.G., Gust loading factors. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, 1967, pp. 1134.
7. Gumley, S.J., A parametric study of extreme pressures for the static design of canopy structures. Journal of Wind
Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 16, 1984, pp 4356.
8. Gupta, Abhay, Wind tunnel studies on aerodynamic interference in tall rectangular buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, Civil
Engineering Department, University of Roorkee (Now Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee), 1996.
9. Holmes, J.D., Mean and fluctuating internal pressures induced by wind. Proc. 5th International Conference on Wind
Engineering, Fort Collins, 1979, pp. 435450.
10. Holmes, J.D., Recent development in the codification of wind loads on lowrise structures, Proc. AsiaPacific
Symposium on Wind Engineering, Roorkee, India, December 1985, pp. iiixvi.
11. Hussain, M., and Lee, B.E., A wind tunnel study of the mean pressure forces acting on large groups of low rise
buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 6, 1980, pp 207225.
12. IS 875 Part-3-1987