Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IV A
Division of Batangas
MALVAR DISTRICT
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee: LUISITO P. DE CASTRO
Position: OIC - PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERVISOR
Review Period: JANUARY-DECEMBER 2014
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Name of Rater: DR. CARLITO D. ROCAFORT, CESO V

Position: SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
Date of Review: JANUARY 2015
TO BE FILLED IN DURING
EVALUATION

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MAJOR FINAL
OUTPUTS

KEY RESULT AREAS

Planning, Organizing
and Networking

OBJECTIVES

Provided assistance to at least 2-3 school

heads who need assistance in preparing
School Improvement Plan/AIP, and Learning
centers Improvement Plan within target date.

TIME LINE
April May
2014

WEIGHT
PER KRA
20 %
6

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(5) Complete and timely submission of
consolidated reports on school and
learning centers improvement plan and
with the following components:

Schools situationer within the

district
Summary of Performance Indicators
Common Actions Points/Programs
M & E Mechanisms
Financial Requirements
Recommendations
ConsolIdate/validate accuracy of
data, reports submitted by schools
for the Division MIS as delegated by
SDS
(4) Consolidated reports containing 4
parts and with good and feasible
recommendations.

ACTUAL
RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

(3) Consolidated reports fairly presented,

with missing components/parts
(2) Poor presentation of reports;
components/parts largely missing.
(1) No consolidated report

Analyzed and interpreted education

indicators within target date.

March 2015

(5) > Record of Performance Indicators

> Trending Analysis
> Action Plan/s to address critical
Indicators
> Implementation Report on
Interventions and Programs
> Full report submitted to SDS
(4) All conditions were met and
satisfactorily accomplished.
(3) 3-4 conditions were met with
satisfactory results.
(2) Conditions are largely absent, with no
actions to address critical indicators.
(1) Data only with no analysis.

Conducted at least one (1) action research on

non-academic factors affecting learning
progress and achievement with target date.

August 2014January 2015

(5) 5 Action research conducted

following prescribed format and
feasible/substantive recommendations,
with results adopted for decisions.
(4) 4 Action research conducted
following prescribed format with very
good results adopted and utilized for
decisions.
(3) 3 Action research conducted
following prescribed format and with
results adopted and utilized for
decisions.
(2) 2 action research conducted with
results adopted and utilized for
decisions.
(1) 1 action research conducted adopted

and utilized for decisions.

Curriculum
Implementation and
Evaluation

Visited and monitored at least 10 schools out

of 20 for supervision of curriculum
implementation on target dates.

January
December 2014

35 %
15

(5)130% and above schools were visited

and monitored with complete
monitoring report
(4) 115-129% schools were visited and
monitored with complete monitoring
report
(3) 100-114% schools were visited and
monitored with complete monitoring
report
(2) 51-99% schools were visited and
monitored with complete monitoring
report
(1) 50% and below of schools visited and
monitored with complete monitoring
report

Provided technical assistance to at least 3-5

school heads in matters of instructional
supervision such as classroom observation
techniques, management of facilities and
resource mobilization, when solicited, within
target date.

January
December 2014
6

(5) 130 and above covered and were

provided
* technical assistance, with
consolidated report on nature of
assistance with reference to
performance and other problems
* monitored desks, textbook or module
deliveries/allocations (wit monitoring
report)
(4) 115-129% of schools covered with
technical assistance provided
(3) 100-114% % of schools covered with
technical assistance provided
(2) 51-99% of schools covered with
technical assistance provided
(1) 50% and below of schools covered
with technical assistance provided

Assisted and served as resource person and

facilitator in at least 4 schools during INSETs

January
December 2014

(5) 130% and above of the schools served

and assisted (with INSET monitoring

within the rating period

form)
(4) 115-129% of the schools served and
assisted (with INSET monitoring form)
(3) 110-114% of the schools served and
assisted (with INSET monitoring form)
(2) 51-99% of the schools served and
assisted (with INSET monitoring form)
(1) 50% and below of the schools served
and assisted (with INSET monitoring
form)

Monitored implementation of at least 1 ALS

program, project and activity within target
date.

January
December 2014

(5) * 130% and above of ALS classes

monitored (with monitoring report and
recommendations)
* Reports submitted and
discussed/presented to SDS.
(4) 115-129% of ALS classes monitored
(with monitoring report and
recommendations)
* Reports submitted and
discussed/presented to SDS.
(3) 100-114% of ALS classes monitored
(with monitoring report and
recommendations)
* Reports submitted and
discussed/presented to SDS.
(2) 51-99% of ALS classes monitored
(with monitoring report and
recommendations)
* Reports submitted and
discussed/presented to SDS.
(1) 50% and below of ALS classes
monitored (with monitoring report and
recommendations)
* Reports submitted and
discussed/presented to SDS.

Human Resource
Development and

Conducted at least 2 formal classroom

observations per week among teachers for

January to
February 2014

30%
10

(5) 130% of the teachers and above were

observed and given assistance to

Management

their professional development.

improve teaching competence (with

supervisory plans, reports and
recommendations)
(4) 115-129% of the teachers were
observed and given assistance to
improve teaching competence (with
supervisory plans, reports and
recommendations)

And
July -Dec. 2014

(3) 100-114% were observed and given

assistance to improve teaching
competence (with supervisory plans,
reports and recommendations)
(2) 51-99% were observed and given
assistance to improve teaching
competence (with supervisory plans,
reports and recommendations)
(1) 50 \% and below were observed and
given assistance to improve teaching
competence (with supervisory plans,
reports and recommendations)
Monitored the conduct of Teacher Induction
Program activities to at least 5 newly hired
teachers (0-3 years), when solicited

June to
December 2014

(5) 130% of the newly hired teachers (0-3

years ) were given Teacher Induction
Program activities (with monitoring and
accomplishment report)
(4) 115-129% of the newly hired teachers
(0-3 years ) were given Teacher Induction
Program activities (with monitoring and
accomplishment report)
(3) 100-114% of the newly hired teachers
(0-3 years ) were given Teacher Induction
Program activities (with monitoring and
accomplishment report)
(2) (51-99% of the newly hired teachers
(0-3 years ) were given Teacher Induction
Program activities (with monitoring and
accomplishment report)
(1) 50% and below of the newly hired

teachers (0-3 years ) were given Teacher

Induction Program activities (with
monitoring and accomplishment report)

Organized and managed at least 1 district inservice training/professional enhancement

based on needs of teachers

JanuaryDecember
2014

(5) 130% and above of district in-service

trainings were organized and managed
(with approved training matrix, M&E
report)
(4) 115-129% of district in-service
trainings were organized and managed
(with approved training matrix, M&E
report)
(3) 100-114% of district in-service
trainings were organized and managed
(with approved training matrix, M&E
report)
(2) 51-99% of district in-service trainings
were organized and managed (with
approved training matrix, M&E report)
(1) 50% and below of district in-service
trainings were organized and managed
(with approved training matrix, M&E
report)

Evaluated performance of the ALS

Coordinator & Mobile Teachers within target
date

January
December 2014

(5) 130% and above of ALS coordinators

covered
(4) 115-129% of ALS coordinators
covered
(3) 100-114% of ALS coordinators
covered
(2) 51-99% of ALS coordinators covered
(1) 50% and below of ALS coordinators
covered

Special Tasks/ other

Assignments

Assisted at least 2-3 school heads in selfmanagement, decision-making and utilization

and development of school resources, when
solicited.

June-Dec. 2014
& Jan-March
2015

15 %
7

(5) 130% and above covered and were

provided assistance with report on
nature of assistance given with reference
to self-management, decision making
and development of school resources.
(4) 115-129% covered and were provided

assistance with report on nature of

assistance given with reference to selfmanagement, decision making and
development of school resources.
(3) 100-114% covered and were provided
assistance with report on nature of
assistance given with reference to selfmanagement, decision making and
development of school resources.
(2) 51-99% covered and were provided
assistance with report on nature of
assistance given with reference to selfmanagement, decision making and
development of school resources.
(1) 50% and below covered and were
provided assistance with report on
nature of assistance given with reference
to self-management, decision making
and development of school resources.

Represented the SDS in the Local School

Board meeting and allocation of budget

JanuaryDecember 2014

(5) 130% and above of the tasks

assigned by the SDS were performed
according to standards set with
accomplishment report submitted to
authorities concerned
(4) 115-129% of the tasks assigned by the
SDS were performed according to
standards set with accomplishment
report submitted to authorities
concerned
(3) 100-114% of the tasks assigned by the
SDS were performed according to
standards set with accomplishment
report submitted to authorities
concerned
(2) 51-99% of the tasks assigned by the
SDS were performed according to
standards set with accomplishment

report submitted to authorities

concerned
(1) 50% and below of the tasks assigned
by the SDS were performed according to
standards set with accomplishment
report submitted/presented to
authorities concerned
OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISH
MENTS

CARLITO D. ROCAFORT, CESO V

Rater

LUISITO P. DE CASTRO
Ratee