Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FOREST BIODIVERSITY
An ELGA project
Submitted to Dr. Jonathan Rubio
By:
Janina Suzette Guillermo
Karl Romney Guingab
Jean Aira Jimenez
Jewel Joie Jumarang
Josef Justo
October 2014
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
Administrative decisions pertaining to the management of forests often rest upon estimates of
the number or the condition of the trees. Such estimates involve some type of sampling
procedures. This procedure must be such that the error of sampling can be assesed , and the
best estimate can be made that is consistent with the time and funds available. The authors
apply mathematical statistics to the problem. The bulletin will be of interest to all those who
deal with sampling procedures, no matter what their field of research may be.
Empirical estimate of the reliability of the use of the Point-Centered Quarter Method (PCQM)
By: Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, Nico Koedam
This paper reports problems associated to the use of the Point-Centered Quarter Method
(PCQM), as well as their possible solutions. Problematic settings in the application of the PCQM
are amongst others due to the presence of multiple-stemmed trees (MST), to ambiguous
settings for measuring the sampling point to nearest tree distance or the tree diameter, both of
which may result in erroneous estimation of silvimetric variables and parameters. The analysis
is based on a database of effective individual tree records including distances, diameters, and
heights measured in the field in a Sri Lankan mangrove forest between 1997 and 2002, and
randomly compiles a series of records that were used as PCQM sampling points. Various
structural forest parameters were calculated, with particular emphasis on density and basal
area.
After proving that multiple- and single-stemmed trees have different silvimetric characteristics,
we adopted an empirical approach to demonstrate the classical PCQM protocol applied to MST
generates significantly different densities (overestimation) and basal areas (underestimation)
depending on which stems are considered for measurement, and we suggest an adapted
PCQM+ protocol (measurement of central stem instead of nearest stem). We test both
protocols in two mangrove assemblages (one composed of Excoecaria agallocha only, and
an Excoecaria agallocha/Rhizophora apiculata mixed forest) with MST proportions varying
between 0% and 100%, at 5% intervals.
The results indicated that the classical PCQM protocol generates density and basal area results
that are strongly correlated with the MST proportion in the assemblage (p < 0.001), whereas
the PCQM+ protocol shows a robustness with no such correlations for density. For basal area
the results of the PCQM+ protocol showed a weak correlation with the MST proportion, and
regression-ANCOVA results indicated that they were significantly different from those of the
highly sensitive PCQM protocol (p < 0.001).
Finally, we conclude by writing out the entire PCQM+ protocol, elaborating on the solutions to
other common problems related to ambiguous settings for the consideration of stems or the
measurement of their diameter (aerial roots, split trunks, dwarf growth, horizontally developing
stems, boundary of an individual in MST, selectively cut trees or tree parts, very sparse
assemblages, use of PCQM for remote sensing ground-truth), and by nevertheless highlighting
the potential of the PCQM/PCQM+ approach. Although we used a mangrove forest data set,
the PCQ-Method and our suggestions are widely applicable to other forest types.
Tropical forest diversity and dynamism: findings from a large-scale plot network
By: Losos, E. C.;Leigh, E. G.
Tropical forest ecologists coordinated by the center for Tropical Forest Science have been
conducting pioneering research on the structure, dynamics, and functioning of tropical forests
for more than 2 decades, establishing a network of large-scale forest dynamics plots (FDPs) on
which all trees above a minimum threshold size have been measured, mapped, and identified.
Characteristics of the FDP network are described (including basic features of tropical forests,
diversity, species accumulation, floristics) and related to global variation in climate,
biogeographic history, natural disturbances, and soil quality and topography. Detailed analyses
of individual plots are then presented, illustrating the depth and range of information
generated by FDPs on tree diversity, seed dispersal limitation, canopy disturbance, fire
response, canopy mono dominance, pollination-mediated population dynamics, and forest
fragmentation. Most chapters focus on an individual plot; all, however, present methods,
analyses, and findings that can be readily transferred to other sites around the world. Finally,
standardized qualitative and quantitative baseline information for each plot is presented, for
use within this volume and beyond, to provide the framework for assessing and comparing how
biotic, abiotic, and stochastic factors affect the dynamics and diversity of tropical forests
worldwide.
The diversity of forest stands may be affected by landscape fragmentation during periods of
climatic change. A modified version of the Jabowa forest model of the dynamic processes of
establishment, growth, and death of forest trees is used in a spatially explicit framework to
elucidate differences in the effects of both spatial structure and spatial processes. In cases with
and without climatic change, the effects of including random or structured fragmentation and
successively lower dispersal probabilities (increased chance of long-distance dispersal) are
examined in simulation experiments. The exclusion of very low dispersal probability (p < 0.001)
has an important effect on species richness. Barriers and random fragmentation also lower
diversity. Climatic change has little effect on diversity alone or in addition to fragmentation;
changes in composition result. These results indicate that rare events, especially of the type
seldom recorded in observations of seed dispersal, are extremely important. The results of our
simulation experiments indicate that model scale must be addressed in more detail.
Designed as a working manual for practicing foresters, this book outlines the basic statistical
concepts and sampling procedures in ground surveys (including sampling of natural
regeneration), illustrated by Indian examples. Suggestions are given on choice of methods and
intensity of sampling, and on elementary data processing.
Forest ecology
By: Spurr, S. H.
A textbook designed for use 'in courses in forest ecology, silvics or principles of silviculture, for
foresters, wildlife managers and others interested in the ecology of forest land'. The subject is
treated in three parts: (I) The forest environment [climatic and soil factors, nutrient cycle,
soil/plant water cycle etc.]; (II) The forest community [competition, succession, disturbance
effects, forest description and measurement]; and (III) The forest [brief accounts of historical
development of forests, the American forest since 1600 etc.]. It is written very largely in the
North American context: for the bibliography 'preference has been given to major
Englishlanguage works published since '.
The revised edition of the undergraduate textbook is not substantially altered from the 1987
edition, and the major changes are additions concerning environmental issues. The book is in 3
major parts. Part I includes 2 chapters discussing the interactions between humans and forests
and the development of the science of forest ecology. Part II includes 14 chapters in 5 sections
covering ecosystem ecology and function (including biogeochemistry and nutrient cycling),
genetic aspects, the physical environment (solar radiation, temperature, wind, soil, water and
fire), the biotic environment (population and community ecology) and temporal changes in
ecosystem structure and function (including ecosystem classification). The final part comprises
3 chapters discussing application of ecological information to the management of forest
ecosystems, modeling, renewability of natural resources and environmental issues. There is a
general subject index.
Forest ecology
By: Barnes, B. V.; Zak, D. R.; Denton, S. R.; Spurr, S. H.
The book is intended as a collection of ideas about silviculture and analytical approaches to its
practice, and is written primarily for use in North America. There are 21 chapters in 5 sections:
Introduction to silviculture (including stand dynamics); Tending and intermediate cutting
(covering thinning, pruning, release with herbicides); Regeneration (including site preparation
and choice of species); Stand development and structure (of various silvicultural systems); and
Silvicultural management objectives (timber, water, wildlife habitat, control of damage,
agroforestry).
Enlightened forest management requires reliable information on the status and condition of
each forest interpreted from a broad context and of change in forest conditions over time.
The process of forest planning must begin with a clear statement of goals, from which detailed
objectives and management plans follow. Goals and objectives for forest management should
reflect the conservation value of a forest relative to other forests of the same general type. This
paper reviews some recent assessments (with emphasis on North America), presents a
framework for forest assessment and monitoring, and suggests some indicators of biodiversity
in forests. Among the broad assessments of forest status and conservation value are a global
`forest frontiers' assessment by the World Resources Institute, gap analysis projects that assess
the level of representation of forests and other communities in protected areas, and eco
region-based conservation assessments conducted by the World Wildlife Fund. Also important
is information on change in forest area and condition over time. Among the common changes
in forests over the past two centuries are loss of old forests, simplification of forest structure,
decreasing size of forest patches, increasing isolation of patches, disruption of natural fire
regimes, and increased road building, all of which have had negative effects on native
biodiversity. These trends can be reversed, or at least slowed, through better management.
Progress toward forest recovery can be measured through the use of ecological indicators that
correspond to the specific conditions and trends of concern. Although there is a wealth of
indicators to choose from, most have been poorly tested and require rigorous validation in
order to be interpreted with confidence.
III.
METHODOLOGY
Forest Assessment
Materials
100 meter field tape
Measuring tape
11 pegs
Calculator
Field slate
Pencil
Objectives
Determine the relative importance of the trees in the forest by determining the
species of trees that is covered by the vegetation of Mt. Palay Palay.
Procedures
Use the 100-meter Field tape and make a 10-point transect line to perform the
assessment of trees.
Note: If the species of tree is unknown take a picture of the tree.
In determining the points identify the nearest tree present in the four quadrats.
Then measure the distance from the point to the nearest tree found inside the quadrat.
Measure the Diameter Breast Height (DBH) of the tree by getting circumference of the
tree. Repeat the same procedure from the remaining quadrats. Then identify the
species of the tree to fill out the Table 3.
Soil moisture
Materials
Aluminum Foils
Pails
Oven drier
Soil samples
Triple beam balance
Oven
Evaporating dish
Objectives
Water is important part of the soil and it is trapped in the soil pores. Measure the
soil moisture by over drying the soil samples.
Procedures
Collect 1kg of soil samples scoop from the 10 points of the transect line then mix the
samples and pack 3 samples of soil by weighing 150g of soils. Place the soil samples
in an aluminum foil in the oven for 24 hours then determine the soil moisture and
texture after incubating the soil samples under 100C.
To determine the soil moisture: first measures the weight of a dry evaporating dish.
Then take at least 30g of soil then place it in the container then weight the contents
to the nearest 10th. Over dry it by 105-110C. Measure the weight of the dry soil.
Compute the moisture content using the formula:
Soil texture
Materials
Soil sample
Soil trowel
Aluminum foils
Sieve Plates
Objectives
To determine the soil texture using the percentage soil particles.
Procedures
Collect 1kg of soil samples scoop from the 10 points of the transect line then mix the
samples and pack 3 samples of soil by weighing 150g of soils. Place the soil samples
in an aluminum foil in the oven for 24 hours then determine the soil moisture and
texture after incubating the soil samples under 100C. Weight 150g oven dry soils
and pass through the sieve using a paint brush. The sieve below traps silt. Weight
the silt particles. The bottoms most sieve plate and the paper below trap are clay
particles. Get the percentage of the sand, soil and silt. Use the soil texture triangle
for soil particle classification.
Materials
Soil Thermometer
Laboratory Thermometer
String
Meter Stick
Objectives
Measure the temperature present in the air and ground to determine the factors
affecting temperature of the surrounding.
Procedures
Use a string to hang the laboratory thermometer under a tree that should be 1
meter above the ground. Record the initial temperature and red the temperature 3x
with the interval of 5 minutes.
Use the soil thermometer to insert to the ground then record the initial
temperature. Read temperature three times with interval of 5 minutes.
Amount of light
Materials
Light meter
Objectives
To measure the amount of light in direct, reflected and dispersed light.
Procedures
Turn on the light meter the expose it directly under the sun for the direct light. Then
start with the lowest intensity (x1) then shift to next intensity (x10) if the display
resulted to 1, which means it reaches its maximum. Then shift it to the next higher
intensity, which is (100X). Determine measurement of direct light by facing censor
facing the sun. Determine the reflected light by facing sensor to the ground.
Measure dispersed light by facing the sensor under the shaded area. Then measure
light intensity 3x with 5 minutes interval.
Materials
Soil sample
Soil test kit
Test tubes
Objectives
To determine the presence of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium from the soil.
Procedures
Use the soil kit to determine the presence of the Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium
from the soil sample by following the instructions present in the soil test kit.
Materials
10 ml beaker
Stirring rod
Objectives
To measure the organic matter present in the soil.
Procedures
Make 3 samples of 5 g of soil from the oven dried soil and put each in three crucibles.
Then record the weight of the crucibles and soil then place it inside the furnace with the
temperature of 5000 C then allows the soil to burn. Allow the soil to cool after 3 hours
then weight the soil and crucible then compute the organic matter by the formula.
( )
Humidity
Materials
Sling psychrometer
Objectives
To measure the amount of the moisture present in the air by determining the
relative humidity.
Procedures
Put some water on the wet bulb to moisten it then close the container. Proceed to
the lighted area then rotate sling psychrometer above the head for 3 minutes. Then
match temperature of the wet bulb and dry bulb in psychrometer then look for the
arrow that will give the percent relative humidity. Repeat procedure for 3x within 15
minutes then do the same procedure inside the room or under the shaded area.
Materials
Wind meter
barometer
GPS
Objectives
To measure the speed of air and wind pressure that will determine the factors
affecting the wind speed and air pressure.
Procedure
Proceed to an elevated place then measure wind speed using the wind meter. Set
the wind propeller to move then record the three highest wind speed then get the
average. Using a barometer or a GPS measure the atmospheric pressure 3x with
interval of 5 mins. Then proceed to the ground then repeat the same procedure.
IV.
Quadrants
Circumference
DBH
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
0.7 cm
0.22
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
0.9 m
0.6 cm
0.19
0.03
0.3 m
0.7 cm
0.22
0.04
0.6 m
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
0.8 m
3
4
Species
Basal Area
0.04
Distance
2.0 m
2
3
4
3
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
0.7 cm
0.22
0.04
0.9 m
0.6 cm
0.19
0.03
0.5 m
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
1.4 m
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
Polyscias nodosa
(Malapapaya)
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
0.4 cm
0.13
0.01
2.0 m
0.7 cm
0.22
0.04
1.3 m
0.7 cm
0.54
0.23
1.4 m
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
1.7 m
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Psidium guajava
(guava)
0.6 cm
0.19
0.03
1.5 m
0.7 cm
0.22
0.04
1.8 m
0.7 cm
0.22
0.04
2.0 m
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
0.6 m
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
Psidium guajava
(guava)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Polyscias nodosa
(Malapapaya)
0.6 cm
0.19
0.03
0.8 m
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
1.9 m
0.7 cm
0.22
0.04
0.4 m
2.0 cm
0.64
0.32
2.4 m
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Psidium guajava
(guava)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Psidium guajava
(guava)
0.6 cm
0.19
0.03
1.6 m
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
2.0 m
0.7 cm
0.22
0.04
1.4 m
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
1.7 m
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
Psidium guajava
(guava)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
0.2 cm
0.06
0.003
2.8 m
1 cm
0.32
0.08
2.4 m
0.6 cm
0.19
0.03
4.6 m
0.1 cm
0.03
0.0007
3m
Psidium guajava
(guava)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Psidium guajava
(guava)
0.2 cm
0.02
0.003
1.1 m
1 cm
0.32
0.08
1.8 m
0.6 cm
0.19
0.03
2.3 m
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
1
2
3
4
10
1
2
3
4
Total
0.3 cm
0.10
0.008
6.0 m
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Muntingia calabura
(Alatiris)
0.04 cm
0.012
0.0001
3.3 m
0.3 cm
0.10
0.008
3.4 m
0.3 cm
0.10
0.008
4.8 m
0.9 cm
0.29
0.07
9m
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
Alstonia batino
Blanco (Batino)
0.02 cm
0.006
0.00003
2.4 m
0.3 cm
0.10
0.008
1.8 m
0.5 cm
0.16
0.02
1.8 m
0.6 cm
0.19
0.03
3.5 m
40
85.8
Each sample was taken at random location in the area. The area near the random point
was divided into four imaginary quadrants and from the center point to the nearest species, the
distance was taken. For the trees the basal area was calculated through the circumference or
diameter at 4 feet above the ground, called as DBH, diameter at breast height). With the
following results, the density, frequency, dominance and importance value can be determined.
Calculations
Habitat: Tropical Rainforest
Total points: 10 10K: 100 total point to plant distance
Species, I
Alstonia
batino Blanco
(Batino)
Muntingia
calabura
(Alatiris)
Psidium
guajava
(guava)
Polyscias
nodosa
(Malapapaya)
Total
ni
AD
RD
ji
RF
RC
IV
Rank
20
14.71
50
90
45
0.022
27.5
122.5
11
8.09
27
40
25
0.017
21.25
73.25
5.15
17.5
50
20
0.021
26.25
63.25
1.47
4.99
20
10
0.020
25
39.99
29.42
100
200
100
0.08
100
Soil Moisture
Soil moisture has an important role in the environment and climate system. It influences
the hydrological and agricultural processes, runoff generation, drought development and other
processes. It is a source of water for evapotranspiration over continents involving water and
energy cycles. Soil moisture is a key variable in controlling the exchange of water and heat
energy between the land surface and the atmosphere through evaporation and plant
transpiration. As a result, soil moisture plays an important role in the development of weather
patterns and the production of precipitation. In Table 2 shown the result of the soil moisture.
Table 2: Soil Moisture
Readings/ Samples
Moisture
16%
13%
13%
Average
14%
Soil Texture
It has an important role in nutrient management or it influences the nutrient retention.
For example, finer textured soils tend to have greater ability to store soil nutrient. It is the
relative proportion of sand, silt, or clay in a soil. Soils with finest texture are called clay soils
while the ones with the coarsest texture are called sand. However, a soil that has a relatively
even mixture of sand, silt, and clay and exhibits the properties from each separate is called a
loam. In determining whether a soil is sand, silt or clay, a textural triangle was used shown in
Figure 1 while the result of the experiment is shown in Table 3.
Figure 1: Textural Triangle
Texture
Loam
Sandy loam
Sandy loam
Average
Sandy loam
Soil Temperature
Air Temperature
3 .6
31
3 .
3 .8
Average
Amount of Light
Through getting the amount of light, the light that is being absorbed by an object, light
being dispersed and being reflected could be determined. Light can be a good source of energy.
The amount of light is presented in Table 5.
Table 5: Amount of Light
Readings/ Samples
Direct Light
Reflected Light
Diffused Light
1250 lux
668 lux
380 lux
1342 lux
611 lux
200 lux
1413 lux
598 lux
277 lux
Average
1668.33 lux
625.67 lux
285.67 lux
pH
1
2
High
High
None
None
High
High
7.2
7.2
High
None
High
7.2
Average
High
None
High
7.2
Organic
1
2
13.63%
11.31%
14.86%
Average
13.33%
Humidity
Absolute humidity is the mass of water vapor divided by the mass of dry air in a volume
of air at a given temperature. The hotter the air is, the more water it can contain. Relative
humidity is the ratio of the current absolute humidity to the highest possible absolute humidity
(which depends on the current air temperature). The relative humidity is shown in Table 8.
Table 8: Humidity
Readings/ Samples
Relative Humidity
1
2
86%
80%
86%
Average
84%
Air Temperature
Wind Speed
Atmospheric
Pressure
3 .6
0.13 m/s
1008 mb
3 .
0.17 m/s
1008 mb
3 .8
0.12 m/s
1008 mb
30.63 C
0.14 m/s
1008 mb
Average
V.
VI.
Philippine set of Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (Forest
Management Bureau Department of Environment and Natural Resources)
INTRODUCTION
The Philippines has embraced the concept of Sustainable Forest Management as the main
policy thrust in order to guarantee the long-term stability of its forest resources. The policy to
SFM is largely attributable to the implementation of measures embodied in the 1987
Constitution; the Philippine Strategy for Sustainable Development and Philippine Agenda 21;
the Master Plan for Forestry Development; and the adoption of the community-based forest
management and watershed/ecosystem approaches as the main strategies for SFM. These key
measures were supported by various policy and institutional reforms embodied in the major
forestry programs and project supported by multi-lateral and bilateral funding institutions.
To measure the progress towards SFM, the DENR formulated a proposed criteria and indicators
for SFM. Initially, the Environmental Performance Monitoring (EPM) System was developed
under Natural Resources Management Program (NRMP). Apart from the EPM, the Model Forest
Project assisted by FAO and Japan has also designed a model forest level measurement of
indicators. However, similar to EPM, the tool is specifically designed for a particular forest
management unit managed by organized forest-dependent communities.
To assess the current state of SFM in the Philippines, it is necessary to have a full understanding
of the various components of SFM and their impacts on forest resources and ecosystems. These
require a system of criteria and measurable indicators to evaluate the changes and conditions
and management systems at national and forest management unit levels like timber
concessions, industrial forest management areas, and community based forest management
areas. In this context, the DE R through the F B implemented the Project PD
/ 3 Rev. 1
(F).
This project is intended to address the need for a system for tracking the progress towards the
achievement of SFM in the Philippines. It also seeks to harmonize and/or consolidate previous
and ongoing efforts within the DENR, which oftentimes are too focused or configured mainly
for a particular forest management unit. Efforts under the project will also lead to the
determination of the level or degree upon which various stakeholders have gone in the
development of their areas. It would also lead into the assessment of the state-of-knowledge
vis- -vis SFM requirements and the present capabilities of the Philippine forest managers.
The C and I for SFM will provide a common yardstick by which the various stakeholders can
determine the state of the countrys forest resources at any given time at any particular
location. With the adoption of mutually agreed upon yardstick, the contentious debates that
characterized discussions on Philippine forestry will be minimized.
It will also lead to a common understanding of how to achieve SFM in the country by
highlighting activities or gaps that constrain or veer away from SFM. Remedial measures by
means of key management interventions can be applied to put back on track the countrys
efforts towards SFM.
The project was implemented with the basic philosophy of applying C and I as management
tools for reporting progress towards SF and enhancing capability of F Us in managing their
forest resources on a sustainable basis.
The Philippine C and I was pre-tested in selected FMUs in the country and were presented in a
series of consultations and discussions with forest managers, non-governmental organizations,
academic institutions, peoples organizations, other government agencies, and other civic
society groups.
Presently, the DENR is developing an appropriate audit system for the Philippine C and I. Similar
to the C and I framework, the audit systems will be pilot-tested in selected FMUs and will be
presented to concerned stakeholders. Alongside the development of Philippine C and I and the
appropriate auditing system is a comprehensive analysis of the existing regulations governing
the implementation of various modalities of forest land and/or resource access and other forest
management schemes. The analysis is aimed at determining the gaps vis- -vis SFM
requirements and existing forest management strategies.
The development of a user-friendly database and management information system for the
Philippine C and I is also being developed to facilitate information management, analysis, and
retrieval.
Purpose of Criteria and Indicators
The Purpose of the Philippine Set of Criteria and Indicators is to provide Forest Managers within
the country an improved tool for assessing changes and trends in forest conditions and forest
management systems. The criteria and indicators will also provide means of assessing progress
towards the attainment of the objective set under Executive Order 318 otherwise known as
Promoting Sustainable Forest anagement in the Philippines and towards to the
commitment to ITTO Year 2000 Objective.
Using the criteria and indicators as management tools will provide the forest managers a
framework for understanding, planning and implementing improved forest management
technique. They will have or enhanced capacity to comprehensively assess the situations of
their forest management units whether they are moving towards or away sustainable forest
management. This will also help policy and decision makers in developing policies and
necessary actions to further strengthen SFM, focusing on aspects where knowledge is still
deficient, and in identifying those areas which are in need of assistance.
By the time that the indicators are made operational and appropriate prescriptions and
standards are set, a sound basis would be created for measuring sustainable forest
management. The indicators identified in this publication were thoroughly assessed through a
series of consultations with different stakeholders and forest managers to see to it that the
identified indicators fit the forestry situation in the Philippines.
The Criteria and Indicators identified in this document will be reviewed and refined repeatedly
to benefit from experiences of different stakeholders and to reflect new concepts of
sustainable forest management. The revision should take into account evolving knowledge
about the performance of forest ecosystems, human impacts on the forests whether planned
or unplanned and the changing needs of society for forest goods and services. Moreover, the
capability to measure indicators will increase and knowledge will improve about the nature of
best indicators to assess forest management in the Philippines.
The Criteria
The criteria identified by ITTO were adopted as elements of sustainable forest management in
the Philippines. Every criterion was accompanied with a full meaning and description as to what
this particular criterion pertains.
Criterion 1, Enabling Conditions for Sustainable Forest Management, covers the general
institutional requirements for sustainable forest management to succeed. Criterion 2, Extent
and Condition of Forests, deals with Forest Resource Security relates to the extent to which the
Philippines has a secure and stable forest state to meet the production, protection, and other
social, cultural, economic and environmental needs of the present and future generations.
Criterion 3, Forest Ecosystem Health, relates to the condition of the countrys forests and the
healthy biological functioning of its forest ecosystem and it deals with the forest conditions and
health as affected by a variety of human actions and natural causes. Criterion 4, Forest
Production, deals with the production of wood and non-wood forest products with perceptions
that production can only be sustained in the long-term if it is economically and financially
viable, environmentally sound and socially acceptable. Criterion 5, Biological Diversity, relates
to the conservation and maintenance of biological functioning of the forests. Criterion 6, Soil
and Water Protection, this criterion deals with the protection of soil and water in the forest and
Criterion 7, Economic, Social, and Cultural Aspects, relates to the economic, social, and cultural
function of the forest.
Criterion 1: Enabling Conditions for Sustainable Forest Management
This criterion addresses the general institutional requirements that are necessary to make
sustainable forest management possible. Most of related indicators cover the legal, policy and
institutional frameworks and are mainly descriptive in nature. Taken together, the information
gathered indicates the extent of a countrys political commitment to sustainable forest
management.
Policy, legal and governance framework
To ensure sustainable forest management, it is important that the forest resources, especially
the permanent forest estate, are secured and protected and that they are managed in
accordance with best management practices involving all stakeholders, in particular local
communities who are dependent on the forest.
Indicator 1.1 Existence and implementation of policies, laws and regulations to govern forest
management.
1. (a) national objectives for forest including production, conservation, protection and
investment
2. (b) the establishment and security of the permanent forest estate
3. (c) forest tenure and property rights in relation to forests
4. (d) the participation of local communities and other stakeholders in forest management
5. (e) the control of illegal activities in forest areas
6. (f) the control of forest management
7. (g) the health and safety of forest workers
Indicator 1.2 Forest tenure and ownership
Indicator 1.3 Amount in funding forest management, administration, research and human
resource development
Indicator 1.4 Existence and Implementation of Economic instruments and other incentives to
encourage sustainable development
Indicator 1.5 The structure and staffing of institution responsible for sustainable forest
development
Indicator 1.6 Number of professional and technical personnel at all levels to perform and
support forest management
Indicator 1.7 Existence of communication strategies and feedback mechanism to increase
awareness about SFM
Indicator 1.8 Existence of, and ability to apply, appropriate technology to practise sustainable
forest management and the efficient utilisation and marketing of forest products
Indicator 1.9 Capacity and mechanisms for planning sustainable forest management and for
periodic monitoring, evaluation and feed-back on progress
Indicator 1.10 Public participation in forest management planning, decision making, data
collection, monitoring and assessment
Indicator 1.11 Existence of forest management plans.
Resource Assessment
Forest resource assessments carried out periodically are vital for ensuring the sustainable
production of forest goods and services for society. They provide the necessary information not
only on the level of yield that may be harvested but also the type and quality of forest produce
that may be extracted.
Indicator 4.1 Extent and percentage of forest for which inventory and survey procedures have
been used to define the quantity of the main forest products
Indicator 4.2 Actual and sustainable harvest of wood and non-wood forest products
Indicator 4.3 Composition of harvest
Indicator 4.4 Total amount of carbon stored in forest stands
Indicator 4.5 Existence and implementation of:
(a) Forest harvesting/operational plans (within forest management plans); and
(b)Other harvesting permits (small, medium and large scale permits without forest
management plans).
Indicator 4.6 Extent of compartments/coupes harvested according to: (a)
Harvesting/operational plans; and (b) Anyotherharvesting/cuttingpermit.
Indicator 4.7 Existence of a log tracking system or similar control mechanisms
Indicator 4.8 Long-term projections, strategies and plans for forest production.
Indicator 4.9 Availability of historical records on the extent, nature and management of
forests
Indicator 4.10 Availability and implementation of silvicultural procedures for timber and nonwood forest products
Indicator 4.11 Availability and implementation of harvesting procedures for timber and nonwood forest products
Indicator 4.12 Area over which silvicultural and harvesting procedures are effectively
implemented
Indicator 5.6 Existence and implementation of procedures for protection and monitoring of
biodiversity in production forests by:
(a) Retaining undisturbed areas;
(b) Protectingrare,threatenedandendangeredspecies;
(c) Protecting features of special biological interest (e.g. nesting sites, seed trees, niches,
keystone species, etc); and
(d) Assessing recent changes in (a) to (c), above through inventories, monitoring/assessment
programs, and comparison with control areas.
Indicator 5.7 Extent and percentage of production forest which has been set aside for
biodiversity conservation.
Criterion 6: Soil and Water Protection
The importance of this criterion is two-fold. First, it has a bearing on maintaining the
productivity and quality of soil and water within the forest and its related aquatic ecosystems
(and therefore on the health and condition of the forest, Criterion 3); secondly, it also plays a
crucial role outside the forest in maintaining downstream water quality and flow and in
reducing flooding and sedimentation.
Quantitative indicators of the effects of forest management on soil and water are, therefore,
such measures as soil productivity within the forest and data on water quality and average and
peak water flows for streams emerging from the forest. This information is difficult and
expensive to obtain and is seldom available for more than a limited number of sites, as each
site has its own characteristics in this respect (e.g. slope, geological structure and the inherent
erodibility of the soil type).
The protection of soil and water is therefore best ensured by specific guidelines for different
situations; these can only be based on experience and research. Valid national indicators can
only be derived from the aggregation of data from indicators at the forest management unit
level, or from the fact that adequate national guidelines exist and are properly enforced in
conformity with the variation in local conditions.
Criterion7: Economic, Social and Cultural Aspects
This criterion deals with the economic, social and cultural aspects of the forest. A well-managed
forest is a constantly self-renewing resource and it produces a host of benefits, ranging from
high quality timber to satisfying the basic needs of people living in and around the forest. It also
contributes to the well-being and enhances the quality of life of the population in providing
opportunities for recreation and ecotourism, as well as in generating employment and
investment in the processing industries. Hence, if sustainably managed, the forest has the
potential to make an important contribution to the overall sustainable development of the
country.
Socio-economic aspects
The very existence of forest is often dependent on the forest being able to generate sufficient
financial resources to ensure its sustainability, besides providing employment and other social
and environmental benefits to society.
Resource: http://forestry.denr.gov.ph/CnI_Framework.pdf
VII.
LITERATURE CITED
Barnes, B. V.; Zak, D. R.; Denton, S. R.; Spurr, S. H. (1997). Forest ecology [online]
Available at: http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19980607188.html [Accessed 6
October 6, 2014]
Smith, D. M.; Larson, B. C.; Kelty, M. J.; Ashton, P. M. S. (1997). The practice of
silviculture: applied forest ecology. [online] Available at:
http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19980608088.html [Accessed 6 October 6, 2011]