Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
TeachingLearning Process
(40%)
June 2014
to
March 2015
Weight
per KRA
20%
June 2014
to
March 2015
15%
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
5 - All daily lesson plans had the
following:
objective,
subject
matter, learning tasks and
assignment
4- Had three of the four parts of
lesson plan
3 - Had two of the four parts
2 - Had 1 of the four parts
1 - No daily lesson plan
prepared
5 - The teacher established
challenging and measurable
goal/s for student learning that is
aligned with the Philippine
Elementary
Learning
Competencies
(PELC)
curriculum
with
the
use
innovative teaching aids like
Laptop & LCD Projectors
4 - The teacher developed a
measurable goal for student
learning that is aligned with the
Philippine Elementary Learning
Competencies
(PELC)
curriculum with the use
3 - The teacher clearly
communicated a focus for
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
A_Mendoza
SCORE*
page1
June 2014
to
March 2015
5%
Student
Outcomes
(40%)
June 2014
to
March 2015
20%
student
learning
that
is
appropriate for students and is
aligned with the Philippine
Elementary
Learning
Competencies
(PELC)
curriculum.
2 - The teacher did not have a
clear focus for student learning.
1 - The teacher did not have a
clear focus for student learning
or the objective is too general to
guide lesson planning or the
objective is inappropriate for
students.
5 - Attendance checking
is
systematically carried out daily,
reasons for absent were noted
and follow-up was made
4 - Attendance checking was
systematically carried out daily
and reasons for absences were
noted
3 - Attendance checking was
systematically carried out daily
2 - Attendance checking was
carried out twice a week
1 - Attendance checking was
carried out once
5 - Class record reflected the
bases 100% of the students
were evaluated and monitored.
4 - Class record reflected the
bases of 98% of the students
were evaluated
3 - Class record reflected the
bases of 95% of the students
were evaluated
2 - Class record reflected the
bases of 93% of the students
A_Mendoza
page2
Community
Visited
parents
of
students
student
needing
June 2014
to
March 2015
June 2014
to
March 2015
June 2014
5%
15%
1%
were evaluated
1 - Class record reflected the
bases of 90% and below of the
students were evaluated
5 - Remediation program is
offered to 90% and above of
students who need it based on
the weekly attendance.
4 - Remediation program is
offered to 85% of students who
need it based on the weekly
attendance.
3 - Remediation program is
offered to 80% of students who
need it based on the weekly
attendance.
2 - Remediation program is
offered to 75% of students who
need it based on the weekly
attendance.
1
Reading
remediation
program is offered to 70% and
below of students who need it
based on the weekly attendance.
5- 100% of students are
promoted in the subject are
taught
4 - 98% of students are
promoted in the subject are
taught
3 - 95% of students are
promoted in the subject are
taught
2 - 75% of students are
promoted in the subject are
taught
2 - 50% of students are
promoted in the subject are
taught
5 - Visited parents trice a month
A_Mendoza
page3
Involvement
(5%)
Professional
Growth and
Development
15%
to
January 2015
June 2014
to
March 2015
1%
June 2014
to
March 2015
3%
June 2014
to
March 2015
5%
Attended3
activities/programs conducted by
the General PTA activities in
school
2
Attended
2
A_Mendoza
page4
activities/programs conducted
the General PTA activities
school
1
Attended
activities/programs conducted
the General PTA activities
school
Submitted given reports on
(Management and Resources)
SBM
June 2014
to
March 2015
5%
June 2014
to
March 2015
5%
by
in
1
by
in
A_Mendoza
page5
RIZA G. ANDRADE
Rater
ARLENE E. MENDOZA
Ratee
DEPED RPMS Form Teachers I
A_Mendoza
page6