Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
external post-tensioning
BY KAREN J. BARCHAS
Figure 1. Partial floor plan: circles indicate point of application of short saddles
between existing concrete columns. Triangles show tube columns, all located
approximately in the center of the 28-foot-square bays.
Figure 3. Section 1 of Figure 1, showing typical east/west truss. The entire posttensioning system is placed between the second-floor slab and the first-floor false
ceiling.
ods, he says.
Since quality
control is so critical to the success
of EPT, Seneca
usually provides
both engineering
and construction
s e rv i c e s.
Even
when construction is performed
by others, as was
the case with a recently completed
Figure 4. Tube column saddle after tendons were strung.
condominium
project,
either
Bondy or Deetz is
always onsite.
There
are
many steps that
must be completed perfectly, like
drilling through
columns, attaching the tendons,
and cable tensioning,
says
Bondy. To make
sure one of us is
able to personally
supervise each of
Figure 5. Short saddle after tendons were strung.
these steps, weve
limited our EPT
Bondy attributes Senecas success
projects to two or three a year.
with EPT to the techniques minimal
disruption to building function and
Luxury condominium retrofit
utilities, lower cost compared with
Construction of a luxury, 15-story
other methods, and faster completion
condominium complex in the Los
times. EPT offers a flexibility thats
Angeles area began in the early
simply not possible with other meth-
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
The sequence of EPT construction was as follows:
1. Five-inch-diameter holes
were cored through each existing column just below the
second-floor slab, avoiding
all rebar.
2. Holes were cored at the approximate centers of each
floor bay to accommodate
the tubular columns.
3. The tubular columns were
erected.
4. The steel saddles were bolted to the bottom of the second-floor slab.
5. The small tolerance gap between the tubular column
bearing plates and the bottom of the floor slabs was
dry-packed with nonshrink
grout.
6. The tendons in all the bundles were strung, but not
tightened.
7. The tendons were individually tensioned to 25 kips, one
at a time in each successive
bundle, first in the east/west
direction and then in the
north/south direction. This
assured relatively equal tension on each bundle.
8. The exposed tendon bundles were fire protected by
wrapping them with metal
lath and hand applying a
vermiculite plaster to a cover of about 1 12 inches.
9. Gaps around floor holes
were patched, equipment
was removed, and the site
was cleaned.
Unusual EPT
application
Seneca
was
brought in at this
point. After examining the plans
and consulting
with the engineer,
Bondy and Deetz
decided that EPT
could be used to
strengthen the
building per the
engineers specifiFigure 7. Tendon anchor plate bearing on column.
cations. Howe ve r,
minimal headroom between
the bottom of
each floor slab
and the top of the
suspended ceiling was a major
obstacle. There
simply was no
way to place tendons under each
floor to generate
10 kips of upward
force on each bay
without lowe ri n g
the suspended
Figure 8. Tendons and saddles in place just before
ceiling an unacfireproofing
ceptable amount.
Yet the first
floor was 18 feet
ing plumbing chases unusable.
high, and the ceiling space under
To correct the problem, the conthe second-floor slab was about 8
structor would have to core about
feetample space for an EPT sysl,000 holes, up to 6 inches in diametem. Senecas solution was to run 18
ter, through each floor. Since it
tube columns from the second floor
would be prohibitively expensive to
to the roof near the center of each
locate the buried rebar, the engineer
bay (Figure 1), weld bearing plates
required a conservative assumption
to the tube columns underneath
that 2,000 bars (both the top and
each floor (Figure 2), and grout the
bottom layers) would be severed on
space between the plates and floor.
each floor. The engineer also deterSince the tube columns were locatmined that, to restore the original
ed in partition walls as close as posfloor strength, 10 kips (one kip
sible to the center of each bay, no
equals 1,000 pounds) of upward
modifications to the architects
force would need to be concentratplans were required.
ed on the center of each of the 270
floor bays, which measured about
Vertical load,
28 feet square. It was determined
no
physical supports
that the traditional steel-beam soluOnly one challenge remained: to
tion was impractical because it
apply a 150-kip vertical load (10 kips
would severely interfere with
per floor per bay) to the bottom of
planned utilities and result in exceseach tube column without placing
sive cost.
Publication # C910536
Copyright 1991, The Aberdeen
Group. All rights reserved