Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
o f Disasters - I
Social reliabil itation i n teie form of special facilities for women, children,
handicapped.
Cornni~~nity
rehabilitation.
Provision for technical assistance, training and equipment.
Preparation of action plans for different regions of the country and their
periodic evaluation and update.
Development of proper ~iiechanisnito ensure proper distribution of relief
niatesial.
9
of
--
IJNIT 2
2.0
Objectives
Introd~~ction
Flood Prone Areas in India
Major Floods
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3.1 Locatioli
2 3 2 Freqllcncy and Ilitcnsity
2.3.3. 1)arnngo Cawed by Floods
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.1 i
2. I2
2.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this Unit, you should be able to:
e
*
e
*
e
2.1 INTRODUCTION
As we have read in Unit 6 of tlie Fo~~ndation
Course in Disaster Management,
floods and drainage congestion constitute a phenomenon that lias disastrous
effects at some place or the other in tlie counl~yalmost every year resulting in
damage, inconvenie~~ce
and even deaths. In i.liis Unit, we shall discuss in solhe
detail tlie flood scenario in India, tlie locations that are subject to such problems,
tlie extent of the vulnerability and tlie damages experienced in the past due to
of tlie ways to deal wi
tloods and dl.ainage congestion for a better ~~nclerstanding
the problem, and analyse the experiences so as lo draw appropriate lessons
Suture. The Gover~imentenactments, as they exist at present atid tlie ones that
under consideration along with the ways of handling flood and drainage problems
will also be examined.
-,
Increased Lll~tlerstending
of Disasters - I
Andlira Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Pur~jab,Rajastl~an,Tamil Nadu and the NorthEastern States. The National Flood Commission Report (1980) identified the
count~y'stlood prone area as 40 million hectares. However not all areas are
affected in a year and tlie situation Iceeps va~yingfrom time to time. On an average
in a year about 8 million ha, get affected . A detailed analysis by a No11
Govelnme~itOrganisation (NGO) identified 190 districts out ofthe totdl number of
districts in India as prone to Iloocls.
Acute drainage congestion is experienced in parts of Utlar Praclesh, Bihar, West
Bengal, tIa~yana,Pul~jaband tlie deltaic areas of Andhra Pradcsli, Drissa apalt
from some local areas in other states. The most flood prone areas in India lie in the
Ganga, Brahmaputra and Baralc river basins. The Indus and its tribc~tariescause
flood proble~iisin the Nortli-west region of India. Among tlie Central India and
Deccan rivers, tlie Narmada, the Tapi, tlie Godavari, the Krishna and tlie Cauvery
are important ones. Tlie regions covered by tlicse rivers cause Ilood problems but
these are not pe~ierallyvery s e r i o ~ ~ones.
s
There are occasional flooclings in some
other smaller rivers like tlie Braliniini, the Baitarani and the Subarnarelclia. Most
of these rivers also cause problems of flooding and drainage in their lower,
particularly tlie deltaic regions.
Tlie National Flood Commission, based on an atialysis of tlie llood afrected area
and population affected as reported by tlic various States (1966-1 978) fo~oundthat
more than halT tlie arca affected in Inclia by foods lie in tlie l.1iree States of Uttar
Pradesll, Bihar and West Bengal. Si~iiilarlyover liall'tlie pop~~lation
in these three
states are affected by floods. The figures in this regard were equally high in tlie
States of Orissa, Assam and Andhra Pradesh.
In a vast country like ours, tlie probleni of floods varies fiom year to year and area
to area. However broad generalisations were made by tlie Central Water
Commission in respect of tlie identified flood regions of tlie major rivers such as
the Brahrnap~~tra,
Ganga, the Northwestern rivers and the Central India and Deccan
rtvers .
The main problem in tlie Ganga-Bralimaputra region are clrainage congestion, bank
erosion, land slides, aggradation, channel changes and their regi~nechanges. The
Central India and Deccan rivers liave well defined and stable channels but drainage
congestion and damage in the flood plains including the Delta arc common
problems.
The Central Water Commission llas been maintaining detailed data and derives
information on state-wise flood prone areas and damage statistics. They also
publish such infor~uationperiodically. Tlie Flood Atlas of India published by them
contains some vely u s e f ~ ~information.
l
The Natio~ialFlood Commission has also .
brouglit sucli useful details on flood prone regions of India and the efforts of
administration towards flood management.
Item
Average
Damage in
1953-90
Mnximi~mdam;~gc
:I
year
7.94
32.86
3.
f4ouses clan~i~ged
(Million)
Catllc lost (Nos.)
I Iurn~unlives lost (Nos.)
7.
1.22
102.905
618.248
( 1 970)
1532
1 I -3 I 6
(1977)
937.56
4630.30
( 1988)
(Rs. Csoscs)
It may be emphasized tliat tlie intensity and extent of floods and tlie
corresponding flood clamages vary from year to year. Still the years 1977, 1978,
1979 and 1988 liave recorded severe damages, as reported by tlie states. In tlie
decade commencing from 199 1 , the severe floods of 1995 would be too recent to
be,forgotten. It will neither be possible nor necessary to discuss in detail all tlie
floods that liave been experienced but we coi~ldbriefly set fo~tlitlie salient
features of two or tliree major floods, tliat occurrcd in recent times.
- 2.3.1
Location
Five states viz., B,iliar, Uttar Pradesli, West Bengal, Orissa and Assam have been
identified as ~iiostpronc to floods. 'This does not mean tliat all these states will
experience liigli floods in tlie same year or at the same time nor tliat tlie other
states will not liave liigli floods. It will only indicate tliat, in an average year, the
flood damages reported from tliese states are likely to be a very significant
fsaction of tlie total damages reported in that year. But there are exceptions. For
instance, tlie flood damage in 1977 in Andlira Pradesli alone was more Illan half
tlie damage in India tliat year. In 1978, the flood damage in Uttar Pradesli alone
was 56% of tliat experienced in India tliat year. During tlie period 1953 to 1990,
the year 1978 witnessed a signii-icantly darnaging liigli flood. 'I'lie area arfected,
the extent of loss to tlie population, houses as reported by tlie State Government
were very liigli. The loss of l i ~ ~ m alives
n was tlie highest in 1977, which was
essentially, due to the very high loss suffered in Ancllira Pradcsli tliat year.
. Siniilarly tlie loss of cattle was tlie highest in tlie year 1979, which was mainly
due to excessive losses in Andlira Pradesli, Gujarat and Rajastlian. I-iowever the
total damage to crops, houses and public i~tilitieswas the highest in 1988.
During 1978, Uttar Pradesli, West Bengal and Biliar accounted for more than two
thirds of the area and population afFected in India. Over four fifth of the I~ouses
damaged in India also lay in these three states. Over 90% oftlie cattle loss that
year was in West Bengal; three quarter of tlie loss of lives was in three states
inentioned. In short we could say tliat over two thirds oftlie national damage due
to tlie tloods was in tliese three states viz., Biliar, West Bengal and Uttar Pradesli.
I n addition, contrary to normal or average picture, the area affected in Iiajasthan
was also very liigli tliat year, perhaps next only to tliat of the highest recorded in
1 977.
Incrcasetl Untlerstnntlirlg-'
of Disasters - I
The National Flood Co~nmissionhad noted that in the triennium of 1976 to 1978
floods and calamities of that type were widespread affecting more states outside
the traditional flood prone zone. This latter group includes Andhra Pradesh and
Rajasthan and to a lesser extent Gujarat and Haryana. The year 1988 was
marked by severe floods in the Ganga Brahmaputra river system. In fact the
combined Ganga and Bral~rnap~~tra
flows, that pass into the Bay of Bengal
through Bangladesh created the severest flood conditions and the largest da~nage
to date in Bangladesh. The Brahmap~~tra
brolce all previo~lshigh flood level
nlarlcs all along the rivers in Assam also.
The Report of the Committee on Flood Management in the North-Eastern states
affected, damage to l~ousesand loss of human
indicates that the area, pop~~lation
lives was the highest in 1988 during 1,he entire period 1953 to 1989. 'The total
damage in Assam that year was also the highest on record in this period. West
Bengal and Uttar Pradesh also suffered but the damage was the severesq in 1978
in respect of the extent of area and population aiyected.
Flood Sr Drrinngc
Increaseti llndcrstn~~tling
of Disasters - I
2.5
Since tlie stat? of the National Flood Management on a planned basis in 1954, the
111ain thrust of flood nianage~nent efforts has been on structural Ineasures to
modify the floods and flood protection worlts. Essentially, these c0111prisethe
following:-
Em banliments/tl~odwal Is
i1
ii)
Storage reservoirs
iii)
Detention basins
iv)
Channel improvements
v)
vi)
vii)
Ring bunds
viii)
Diversion works
Embankments
15764'Km.
Drainage channels
3 1888 I<m.
'Towns protected
857
Villages raised
4705
Area benefitted
Cost
Over the years, it has been realised that: flood msnagement is also possible tliroi~gl~
other types of activities, sucli as : lnodirying tile s~isceptibilityto flood damage and
rnodiQing tlie loss burden. Fload plain management, flood proofing, disaster
preparedness, flood forecasting and warning, and redevelop~neritare steps that
attempt to niodify the susceptibility to flood damage. In fact the realisation in
recent years is that the nonstructural rneasilres are indeed very effective in reducing
2.6
'VIie main tliri~sLof disaster managenlent slioulcl be sliifecl away liom tile prescnt
..
reliel' al,proach towa~.clstlisasler r n ~ l l ~ t t i o nIn. fact it is increasingly felt that all
development prc!jccts in virlnerrtble arcas shoulcl be linlted with and used to tlie
~naxirni~m
exterlt as clisaster mitigation machinery. In a poor country lilce ours,
reliel' cloles and such recurring expenscs witllout atti~ckingtlie ri~otcausc by
clisaster. mitigative cl'f\)~-ts\\!ill bc il \vnslel'i~l/LIXLII.!/.
I le~iccill1 post-reliabilitalive
nteasul-es should also aim at mitigation ofdisasrers Illat are lil;ely to arise in li~turc.
In tlie frclcl of floocl management In particular, we milst realise that a lack 01'
disc~pl~ne
in rcspccting tlie river's dollinin iri the hl-m of lloocl plain, witliout
atlecluate safeguards is to be avoidccl. The approach to managcnicnt oS floods
should inclirclc a package of mcasurcs likc assessnlent of llic vulnerability,
clclineation of vulnerable areas, publishing the inro~.rnntionon \i~lncrabil~ty
at
cli~fci.cntlevcls of'probable Iloods, floocl plain I-cgulationetc.
In tlic present limited colitcxt of tlie disaster preparedness measurcs. at'tcr any
[looil clisastc~evcnt, tlic many desirable steps \+auld incli~clethe Ibllowing:
i)
ii
recording {lie extent of tlie natural event, tlie flood level etc.
decades was carefi~llyexa~liinedby a high lcvcl espcrl body, called tlie National
Flood Comn~issionand its findings were made available in 1980. It had 11iildc
many valuable recomrnendatio~~s
for effective iloocl clamage reduction and offered
suggestions lor a flood management policy. Anyone interested in a study of tlie
tlood management in India would greatly profit by a carefill study of its report as
also the guidelines and instructions L'or tlie implementation of the report issued by
tlie Govcrnment ol' India in 1981. Those who look forygd to on update thereof
Couldalso look up the reports of two committees set by the Government of India to
study the flood situation in 1987, in the North-East and in lower Ganga basin as
also Orissa rivers. The recommendations made in these reports are still valid to a
significant extent. Tlie revised approach to disaster management mentioned earlier
is another relevant matter. Tlie salient elements of tlie lessons drawn in flood
management would include the following:-
Iocrei~sedlJnderstanrling
uf Disnsters - I
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
Flood plain zoning which is one of tlie most effective ways of minimising
flood damages should be adopted.
v)
vi)
Tlie active participation of tlie people concerned at all stages of a project for
flood management should be ensured.
26
An examination of the ways to deal with floods and drainage congestion brings
out the fact that there is no u ~ ~ i q solution
ue
to this problem which is applicable in
all situations and locations. A package of available measures within the overall
framework of water resource development is available and a specific measure or
combination of measures in a given situation is a matter for careful study. In the
same manner the mitigation of flood losses is a complex matter which involves
in addition to nature's behaviour, human actions by way of intrusion into the
2.9
LET US SUM UP
Vast areas of India are subject to probleins of floods and drainage congestion. In
particular, the states of Biliar, Uttar Pradesli, West Bengal, Assam and Orissa
are likely to suffer more. Most of the time in a year large damages occur in one
portion or the other of India, Essentially,~tllehigh precipitation concentrated
over a few. days in a year and the inability of the active river channel to carry it
away safely coupled wit11 indiscriminate liu~nanencroach~nentinto the flood
plain are responsible for tlie mounting flood damages. There are a number of
bossible ways of dealilig with the hatter and the specific solution or package of
measures is a matter for expert multidisciplinary study and. decision making.
While both structural and non-structural options are possible, the empliasis in
recent years has been on non-structural measures and on planlied disaster
mitigatiol1 eff0l.t~.The costs and benefits are linkecl with the extent of risk taken
or pern~itted~ ~ n d difl'erent
er
probability levels of severily of fi~tureflooding~.
People's participation at all stages of such projects enhances the chances of
cnliglitened cooperation uft.he people in disaster preparedness and management.
Banlc crosion
I3encfit-cost analysis :
,411
Chenoel
Flood fighting
Return periotl
cspec~eclto review.
Rislc analysis
Rislc mwnagc~neut
Statistical probability :
Valnerability
Osbow lake
Sluiccs
of Global
,
2.12 ANSWWRS
TO
CHECK
YOUR
PROGRESS
Drainage congestion
Bank erosion
Land slides
Aggraclation
Channcl changes
Drainage congcstion is said to occur when the areas ilooded with water
due to rainfall and river spill are not able to drain ofT within a reasonal~le
pcriocl of time, tl~uscrcating flood.
b. Storage
c. Detention Basins
d. Channel improvements
e. Bank stabilisation and anti-erosion works,
f.
g. Ring bunds
11.
Diversion works.
Ir~cr.cnsetIUnt~er-stilrlrting
of D h s t e r s - I
UNIT 3
CYCLONE
Ob-jectives
Introcluction
Major Cyclones in India and Darnqge Caused
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.2.4
3.0 OBJECTIVES
Afer reading this Unit, you should be able to :
3.1
INTRODUCTION
There is Iia~dlyany year when India is not visited by a severe cyclone (also called
cyclonic storm or Tropical cyclone). Tlie Indian mainland is flanked on eartli side
by cyclo~ieprone Bay of Bengal and tlie Arabian Sea. Furthtrmore, there are two
cyclone scasons viz., Pre- mousoon (April-May) and Post- monsoon (OctoberDecember). That is why, every year a few cyclonic stor~nsoccur in tlie Indian
territory: morc in tlie Bay of Bc~igalthan tlie Arabian sea, tlie ratio being 4:l
approximately.
'1-