Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Project Overview
Ethyl benzene plant: simulation, design, optimization,
and heat integration
3 phases:
1. Simulation and design improvements (4 weeks)
2. Optimization (4 weeks)
3. Heat integration (3 weeks)
Project Assessment
Three components (total 60%)
Individual quiz (mid-sem)
15%
30%
15%
Goal
Design a plant to manufacture EB with a capacity of
368,000 tonnes/year (based on 340 production
days/year)
Purity of at least 99.97 mol%
6
Process Information
EB
Usually produced by liquid-phase zeolite alkylation of
benzene
2 side reactions: alkylation of EB to form diethyl
benzene (DEB) and trans-alkylation of DEB to produce
more EB
The three main reactions that occur in the reactors:
6 6 + 2 4 8 10
8 10 + 2 4 10 14
10 14 + 6 6 28 10
Pure benzene
Ethylene with ethane as impurity (0.1 vol%)
Separation section
Benzene column to separate benzene (for recycle and transalkylation) and lights for purge
EB column to separate EB product
Trans-alkylation reactor
Two recycles
Phase 1 Tasks
Develop steady-state simulation case of the
preliminary design
Redesign the plant to meet the process constraints
(e.g., alkylation reaction temperature between 170C
and 270C)
Current design has 2 ethylene injection points with 1
heat removal stage
The reactor temperature is 65C; higher T not possible
if we want to maintain liquid phase reactions
Is this the right reaction section design?
The modified flowsheet will be the base case for
optimization and heat integration
Phase 2 Tasks
Develop unit sizing, costing and economics
spreadsheet
Identify and evaluate effect of design variables
on plant economics
Identify dominant design variables
Understand dominant economic design tradeoffs
Demonstrate the dominant tradeoffs quantitatively
Phase 3 Tasks
Explore and incorporate heat integration to
improve plant energy efficiency
Current design has basically no heat integration
Propose a MER network for the plant
Systematic pinch analysis or rational coupling of
process streams
11
Report Deliverables
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Process description
Standard PFD (A3 size)
Material balance table
Dominant design variables trade-off analysis (with
plots, etc.)
Summary of operation criteria (e.g., kg feed per kg
product, steam consumption per kg product,
conversion, selectivity, etc.)
Sizing and costing of major equipment
Optimization results of local design variables (e.g.,
column reflux ratio)
Detailed design and HAZOP of 1 selected equipment
PFD with heat integration
12