Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Leadership and management are two distinctly different roles with a somewhat
paradoxical relationship.
Abraham Zaleznic, in a now-famous 1977 Harvard Business Review article, was one of
the first scholars to differentiate between managers and leaders. According to Zalzenic,
managers are focused on getting the job done, whatever that job may be. While
managers are concerned with how work is done, leaders are concerned with what is
done. This view is echoed by Warren Bennis and Burt Nanus, who state that managers
do things right, and leaders are people who do the right thing. Yet Zaleznic goes further,
implying that managers are overly rational, somewhat detached and task-oriented—a
living personification of Frederick Talyor’s Principles of Scientific Management. By
contrast, Zaleznic views leaders as intuitive, empathetic and people focused—a
precursor to the emotionally intelligent and transformational forms of leadership that
became popular in the late twentieth century. It is important to note that Zaleznic
distinguished leaders from managers, not leadership from management. In Zaleznic’s
view, managers and leaders were very different types of people, each with their own
distinctive values and personalities.
In 1990, John Kotter, another Harvard scholar, offered a new view of the difference
between leadership and management. According to Kotter, managers are concerned with
stability, efficiency and order, while leaders are concerned with innovation, adaptability
http://leadershipskills.org.au/leadership-
management