Evaluation components of DD Projects:

Semester-II of 2014-15
Chemical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi
A. For CHD771, Minor project
Activity

Intermittent evaluation Mid

by supervisor
Semester*

End Semester*

Marks

32=6

30 (Panel
Members)
+40(supervisor)

Schedule

2nd Feb
27th March

Submission

15 (5 Marks
supervisor)

9
(Paper format )**
Draft should be
submitted to their
supervisor 24th April
Final submission : 29th
April: hard copy in the
Department

Evaluation of DD Minor Project for the month Feb/March

Name:
Entry Number:
Project Title:
Marks obtained for the month Feb/March is 0 / 1 /

2/

(circle the number)

Signature of Supervisor:

Please look at the end of the document for more on * and **.

Page 1

B. For CHD871, 873 Major project Part-1

Activity

Intermittent evaluation Mid

by supervisor
semester*

End Semester*

Submission
(Any Journal format )

Marks

34=12

30 (Panel
Members)
+34(supervisors)

9**

Schedule

30th January
27th February
17th March
3rd April

15(5 Marks
supervisor)

Draft should be
submitted to their
supervisor 24th April
Final submission : 29th
April: hard copy in the
Department

Evaluation of Dual degree Major Project Part-1 for the months January/February/March/April

Name:
Entry Number:
Project Title:
Marks obtained for the month January/February/March/April is 0 / 1 /
number)

2/ 3

(circle the

Signature of Supervisor:

Please look at the end of the document for more on * and **.

Page 2

C. For CHD872, 874 Major project Part-2

Mid semester

15

End Semester
Work Done

Quality of written Thesis/Paper

25 by examiner +
30 by supervisor+
10 by Internal

10 by examiner +
10 by supervsior

Final submission, soft copy and 3 hard copy in the

Department
Coordinator will give final grade based on total marks obtained in the following items.
Examiner, supervisor and other committee members will recommend some numeric
corresponding to followings for presentation component ONLY. Excellent(9), Very Good(8),
Good(7), Average(6), poor (5), extremely poor(3).
The paper or poster presentation in peer reviewed conference, submitted paper/ patent or some
other form of IPR / non-IPR outcomes, working prototype etc. will award extra marks
( maximum 10 by supervisor +maximum 10 by examiner).
* In the all the evaluations supervisor and other committee members will recommend some
numeric corresponding to followings for presentation component ONLY. Excellent(9), Very
Good(8), Good(7), Average(6), poor (5), extremely poor(3). This will be converted to exact
number by coordinator. The grading will be done based on their total marks obtain.
** Template for Submission of end semester progress: It should contain (i)Abstract[1/2 page]
(ii)Introduction[2page] (ii)Models/Experimental [maximum 2 page](iv)Results [maximum 6
page including figures], (v) Reference (vi)Appendix[No page limit]
Ideally introduction should contain maximum four paragraphs. 1st paragraph introduce to the
broad area, application of the topics of interest, specific problem of interest. 2nd paragraph should
discuss the literature survey, which should bring out what has been done and what you want to
study. 3rd paragraph should discuss the scope and broad methodology adopted. 4th paragraph
should outline the content of the report.
(ii) In model/experimental section, discuss the model or experiments that you want to do. Also
discuss the methodology of doing simulations or experiments. If it is experimental work, put
Chemicals required, source etc.
If you have derivation, raw data etc., put them in the appendix.

Please look at the end of the document for more on * and **.

Page 3