The Far Side of the Moon:

A Look into Radical Islam and its Role in Bringing About the New World Order

ABSTRACT
When looking at history from a much wider perspective, it is easy to illustrate how our current state of affairs is
nothing more than a well-orchestrated collapse that is meant to bring about a complete system of control; this has
come to be known as The New World Order.
What is the New World Order? It is this brainwashing of the youth into believing their security and livelihood
comes from our governments. In the Western world, we have become passive watchers who cleave to comfort at
the expense of our freedom, and we have allowed our leadership to grow into an unstoppable force with which
there are only two options: assimilate into the new paradigm or be labeled as a political dissident and domestic
terrorist.
In the United States, our founding father were statesmen, diplomats, and other notable public figures who had had
long and respected careers at the national or international level. They acted in a capacity that was for the greater
good of the nation and its respective common concerns and interests. In todays world, statesmen are a dying
breed and are all but extinct; they have been replaced by an alpha predictor species known as the politician. You
may ask yourself, what is that hell does that mean?
Politicians are hollow shells puppets if you will. They are whores-for-hire that hate freedom and get intoxicated
by power. They use race and religious divisiveness as a means to strip us of our rights and send us to our homes
like whipped dogs. They feed from our apathy and loathe our attempts to exercise the freedoms bestowed upon
us by our creator that were ratified by the constitutionalists who were our founding fathers. They use the media to
spread their lies and propaganda while dumbing-down the population with cheap technology and shiny objects.
The worst part about politicians is that they have fed us their bullshit for so long that we actually standby
seething albeit completely enamored by the circus that has become our ruling monarchy.
This attempts to outline the burgeoning of the new, radical Islamic state and how it has become the catalyst
through which the New World Order will rise from the shadows.
History marks that military science assumes that the bigger the army, the stronger it is. On the other hand, on
vaguely do they recognize, that during military combat, the finally strengths of an army is it true physical capacity
multiplied by one unknown X. This X is none other than the spirit of the troops measured as the greater or
lesser desire to fight and confront danger.
Men with the desire to fight, who also understand why they are fighting, regardless of who they are fighting,
whether they are under the command of military geniuses or those of normal intelligence fighting with clubs or
machine guns that fire 30 rounds a minute, these men will put themselves in the most advantageous conditions for
fighting and they will triumph.
Che Guevara, on Guerrilla Warfare during Interview with Lisa Howard circa 1964

I.

The origins of radicalism in Pakistan

In order to understand radical Islam and its current role in international affairs, it is very important to
understand the origins of the areas from which it spawned. For Pakistan, the origins of radicalization
throughout the sub-continent actually began thousands of years before the arrival of the first Europeans.
The timeline below outlines all of the major events that have shaped the face of radicalism in present-day
Pakistan:
A. 3500 B.C., Dravidians began delineating people into classes; the darker-skin Indians were put into
the lowest class. The Indus River Valley (Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro) grew into an expansive
civilization (this predates the Sumerians of Mesopotamia).
B. 1500 B.C., Indo-Aryans invade the Indus River Valley and began to push out the Dravidians; they
began to inject concepts of class (Varna), which became the basis for the caste system in
Hinduism.
1. The Hindus believe that each life (i.e. reincarnation) is called Ashrama and it revolves
1
around dutiful righteousness (the law of Dharma ), which requires each Hindu to serve
their caste as righteously as possible. There were five (5) level to the original Hindu
caste system:
a. Brahmins (priests)
b. Kshatryas (warriors)
c. Vayshas (merchants/traders)
d. Shudras (laborers)
e. Dashas (untouchables)
2. The Indo-Aryans also brought the concept of Kings (Rajas)
C. 324 B.C., a concept arose that all of the kings (Rajas) should be from an alliance and create one
central government; this becomes known as the Mauryan Empire and lasted for about 140 years
D. 184 B.C., a prince named Ashoka became the 1st ruler of India
E. 711, first Muslims came by sea to the Sindh province and began to settle around Karachi; they
were not very peaceful people
F. 977, Muslim invaders came to Ghazni; Mahmud of Ghazni traveled down the Khyber Pass into
India and began to attack and Kill Hindus for being idolaters. This started a 200-year period in
which anti-Muslim sentiment began to propagate from a wave of Muslim traders, merchants,
and Sufi missionaries2
G. 1206, a series of dynasties (sultanates) came into rule; most of the invades from Persia and
Central Asia (1206-1526)

It is imperative to understand The Law of Dharma because it is the de facto underlying cause of Hindus to convert to Islam.
It states that you are born with a certain set of duties in your life. Under Dharma, your current life is a reflection of your past
lives; therefore, it is your duty to do well in order to move up-the-chain to the next caste level in your next life. If you do not
perform your duties well in this life, you will be degraded to the next inferior caste level in your next life; if you alread y in the
lowest caste, you will be degraded to the animal kingdom and again be allowed to progress upwards into the human kingdom.
Dharma is a concept that you are required to become the very best at whatever is in your destiny to do, so duties are not a
burden. If it is in your destiny to labor in an iron, you should feel grateful about being able to carry out your destiny. It is
believed that it is better to fail at your duty rather than do something that is not in your destiny.
2
The original Muslim missionaries were Sufi; they believed it was better to assimilate Islam into the live and cultures of
converts, not eradicate their belief systems and heritage with mindless conformity.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 2 of 18

H. 1526, the Mughal empire was established and lasted until 1707; the classic period of India
started in 1556 with the accession of Jalauddin Mohammad Akbar (Akbar the Great), and India
enjoyed much cultural and economic progress as well as religious harmony 3
I. 1725, the empire began to disintegrate, weakened by wars of succession, agrarian crises, fueling
local revolts, the growth of religious intolerance, the rise of the other empires (Maratha, Durrani,
Sikh), and finally British colonialism
J. 1813, The Anglo-Russian Great Game began under conflicting imperialistic interests of the
British and Russian Empires; it lasted until 1907. The two countries positioned themselves
strategically around land areas of economic interest
K. 1839, British-Indian forces ventured deep into the Pashtun area and began war with the Afghan
rulers (First Anglo-Afghan War). By 1842, the British-Indian forces were completely annihilated
and the war ended
L. 1857, rebellions ensued throughout the Upper Gangetic plains, central India, and regions of Uttar
Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, and Delhi. This was Indias First War of Independence, and is
known as the Indian Rebellion of 1857
M. 1858, British rule was established over the entire Indian sub-continent and remained until 1947;
they began to focus on the underlying animosities amongst the Muslim and Hindu populations by
empowering local Rajas to rule various states (Rajastans)
N. 1866, Darul Uloom Deoband was founded in Deoband, India by Muslims who were very hostile
toward the British rule and were committed to a literal and austere interpretation of Islam 4. They
began to establish madrasas (religious schools) throughout all of the sub-continent in order to
promote their radical approach to Islam; one of their schools produced Mullah Omar
O. 1878, British again invaded Afghanistan (Second Anglo-Afghan War), but withdrew a couple of
years later due to mass casualty losses
P. 1885, Indian Brahmins formed the Indian National Congress, which was a movement to have
English-speaking, educated, Brahmins and Parsis (Zoroastrians) run Indian affairs
Q. 1893, Abdur Rahman Khan and Sir Mortimer Durand agreed to mark a line between Afghanistan
and British-ruled India; this created the country of Afghanistan to act as a buffer zone between
5
their interests in India and the expanding Russian Empire (the Durand Line )
R. 1906, Mohammad Ali Jennah (father of Pakistan), established the Muslim League as a voice for
Muslims living in India
S. 1930, amid fears of under-representation and neglect of Muslims in politics; Allama Iqbal called
for an autonomous state, in Northwestern India, for Indian Muslims
T. 1940, Quaid-e Azam Muhammad Ali Jennah espoused the Two-Nation Theory 6 and led the
Muslim League to adopt the Lahore Resolution of 1940; this set the stage for the creation of the
state of Pakistan (Land of the Holy)

Because of the Law of Dharma and caste system, Islam spread like a wildfire throughout Shudra (laborers) and Dasha
(untouchable) communities because it gave them an alternative means to live equally amongst their fellow human beings.
4
This sect of Islam is very violent and opposes all Western ideologies; they want to purify Islam by discarding all un -Islamic
accretions to faith; they blame the West for the downfall of the once great Islamic Empire (caliphate).
5
The original 1983 Durand Line Agreement was written in English, with translated copies in the Dari language, though it is a
common belief that only the English version was actually signed by Amir Abdur Rahman Khan, which was a language he could
neither read nor understand.
6
Indias idea was to be a secular state with a parliamentary democracy; however, the Muslims only made up 12% of the
population in India, so they knew they would never have a fair voice in parliament. Because their ways of life were
unquestionably tied to religious duty in the Quran, they began to actively fight for an Islamic state.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 3 of 18

U. 1947, Britain announced the decision to end its rule in India, which ensued a mass transfer of
power and independence amongst the religious groups (i.e. Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims, et cetera).
Pakistan was carved out of two Muslim-majority wings in the eastern and northwestern regions
of British India, which comprised the provinces of Balochistan, East Bengal, the Northwestern
Frontier Province , West Punjab and Sindh. The controversial, and ill-timed, division of the
provinces of Punjab and Bengal caused an explosion of communal riots across Indian and
Pakistan - millions of Muslims moved to Pakistan and millions of Hindus and Sikhs moved to
India. Disputes arose over princely states7, including the Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir,
whose Hindu ruler had acceded to India following an invasion by Pashtun tribal militias; this led
to the First Kashmir War in 1948.
1. Over 1,000,000 Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims were killed in riots that broke-out during the
partition.
2. From 1947-1970, huge famine struck India because a great majority of the fertile land
was in west Punjab (Pakistan), so millions of more Indians starved to death during this
time.
3. Scars from this traumatic experience are still prevalent throughout the senior leadership
echelons of both countries.
4. Pakistan was established to be a homeland for Muslims in South Asia; however, only 2/3
of the Muslims actually went over to Pakistan, which was a tremendous defeat to the
morale of the movement; the Pakistani government became very paranoid, aggressive,
and suffered a huge identity crisis it began to view the state of Kashmir as a struggle
for the survival of their newly established country. Because of this, Pakistan has still not
found its national identity. *The 1/3 of Muslims that did not go to Pakistan viewed
themselves as Indians and did not want to identify themselves with Muslim
Radicals.
5. Since the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan had never been demarcated, the
Federally Administered Tribal Areas (F.A.T.A.), located within the North Western
Frontier Province (NWFP), agreed to become part of Pakistan only if they were able to
maintain their autonomy and NEVER have to fall under the control of the central
governments authority8.
6. Mujahirs (immigrants) came from Northern India and settled in Southern Pakistan
(Karachi), but were regarded as invaders and not welcomed by the Government of
Pakistan (GoP).
7. During the partition, the sub-continent was divided into a 84/16 split; however, the
military was able to choose where is wanted to go. Over 34% of the military chose to go
to Pakistan, which is the reason they have been the only viable and functional entity
from day one and why the military controls nearly every aspect of the countrys
infrastructure.

During the partition agreement in 1947, territories were divided according to their religious majorities. Balochistan, Sindh,
west Punjab, and Northwest Frontier provinces had a majority of Muslims living in them and were ruled by Muslim Rajas.
Jammu and Kashmir, however, was ruled by a Hindu Raja, but had a Muslim-majority population; by all accounts it should have
been Pakistani territory, but the Hindu Raja wanted to partition to India though he could not make up his mind. A bordercontrol dispute started just six-days after the partition began.
8
To date, the government of Pakistan still maintains they have no central authority in that region; however, the huge weapons
and drug trade makes too much money for them not to be involved.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 4 of 18

V. 1955, diplomatic relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan were severed after the ransacking
of Pakistans embassy in Kabul; a small series of conflicts broke out along the border
W. 1958, a military coup dtat under the command of Chief of Army Staff General Ayub Khan
occurred; he immediately instituted marshal law and remained in power for 11 years
X. 1961, major Afghan incursions on Pakistans western border 9 broke out.
Y. 1965, the Sino-Indian War a war between China and India over the disputed Himalayan border.
Subsequently, India began a rapid program of reforming and expanding its military, and held a
series of conferences on Kashmir issue.
Z. 1965, Pakistan and India go to war with one another (Indo-Pakistan War)
AA. 1971, Pakistan and India go to war with one another again (Indo-Pakistan War); a 13-day war
that ended in a disastrous defeat for Pakistan and the establishment of Bangladesh 10 - this is also
known as the Bangladesh War of Independence.
BB. 1973, there was a military uprising in the Pakistani province of Balochistan. The Balochistan
11
Liberation Front (BLF) was created to gain independence from Pakistan this civil uprising
lasted until 1976.
CC. 1977, the civilian government under Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was overthrown in a bloodless coup
dtat the Pakistani military took control and Chief of Army Staff General Zia-ul-Haq became
Chief Martial Law Administrator in 1978.
DD. 1978, strict Islamic Law was introduced into the countrys legal system, contributing to currentday sectarianism and religious fundamentalism, as well as installing a sense of religious purose
within the youth; this began several years of martial law.
EE. 1979, Soviet Union invades Afghanistan; the U.S. CIA begins filtering weapons and money
through Pakistani ISI agency to assist Mujahadeen fighters in combating the Russian
occupation12.
FF. 1989, Soviets withdraw from Afghanistan; all U.S. aid and funding to Pakistan ended.
GG. 1998, Soviets becomes a nuclear power
HH. 1999, (Kargil War) an armed conflict breaks out between India and Pakistan and the Kargil district
of Kashmir and other areas along the Line of Control (LOC) 13.
II. 1999, there is a military coup dtat under the command of Chief of Army Staff General Pervez
Musharraf.
After the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan and all foreign aid ended, a large void was left in Pakistans national
identity and they began to redirect their efforts at becoming a global, nuclear super-power. Since September 11,
2001, the Pakistani military has received hundreds of billions of dollars to assist in the eradication of global
terrorism; however, because Pakistan suffers from extreme paranoia, it has used the foreign resources and funding

th

Many Pashtun Afghans regarded the 19 century Anglo-Afghan border (the Durand Line) treaties as void and were trying to
re-draw the borders with Pakistan or trying to help create an independent state (Pashtunistan) for the ethnic Pashtun people.
10
After the partition of 1947, Pakistan was divided into two parts (eastern and western). Eastern Pakistan (now Bangladesh)
was surrounded on all sides by India, and consisted of less-radicalized Islamic factions. India used this to their advantage and
assisted Bangladesh in vying for its independence.
11
Much like the Bangladesh secession, the Baloch rebellion of the 1970s threatened civil disorder to a United Pakistan.
12
Pakistans largest intelligence agency (the ISI), which began with the birth of the nations, has been heavily involved in the
affairs of Afghanistan since the late 1970s. During Operation Cyclone, the ISI with the full support/funding from the U.S. CIA
and the White House recruited huge numbers of Mujahadeen militant groups on the Pakistani side of the Durand Line to cross
into Afghanistans territory for missions to destroy the soviet-backed Afghan government.
13
The Line of Control (LOC) serves as the de facto border between Pakistan and India.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 5 of 18

to arm militants in the FATA so as to prolong the war in Afghanistan and remain a focal point for the global
community14.
II.

Beginning stages of discontent towards the West; oil discovery in Iran

Iran had always played a critical role in the Middle East and Southwest Asia. In terms of current events,
though, they believe it is their destiny to return their country to the greatness of the late Persian Empire;
however, because of the century of turmoil, predicated by what they feel has been Western
Oppression, they do not want any involvement from the West.
Despite having 71% of its population structure between the ages of 15-65, it still only has a median age
of about 27 years old. This is due to the death toll from the Iran-Iraq War during most of the 1980s. As
most of Irans military experience left the country when the Shah fled from Iran in 1979, by the climax of
the war, the armed forces recruited children some younger than 10-years old to conduct human
15
wave swarms against well-armored divisions and even to simply clear minefields. This tactic, along with
other mass casualties from combat and chemical warfare, left a huge generational gap in Iran. Children
that were slightly before and even during the interim stages of the revolution cannot relate to the
ideologies of the Ayatollahs who run the country under strict Islamic jurisprudence. In todays Iran, the
new generation conducts underground movements to gain unfettered access to the outside world (i.e.
information, technology, and goods), and re beginning to understand that the Islamic Revolution simply
ousted a cruel, oppressive dictator (the Shah) and replaced it with a collective body of Islamic
fundamentalism (the Ayatollahs) whose aim is to strip individuals of their humanity and abilities to think
freely. In fact, Iran is on the verge of a counter-revolution. The timeline below outlines all of the major
events that have shaped the face of present-day Iran.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.

1901, Darcy Concession signed (British exclusive rights to all oil in Iran).
1908, enormous oil strike in Majid-e Suleiman.
1909, creation of the London-based Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC).
1914, the British government gained direct control of the Iranian oil industry.
1933, a 60-year agreement signed established a flat payment to Iran of four British pounds for
every ton of crude oil exported; Iran was denied any right to control oil exports.
F. 1935, the APOC was renamed to the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC).
G. 1935, under British influence, the Iranian government began to secularize the Iranian people by
force.
H. 1939, Iran requests the support of the U.S. to abate a growing soviet and British military
presence in their country.
I. 1941, Reza Shah was disposed; his son, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, was installed by an invasion of
British and Soviet troops.
J. 1950, Iranians begin a popular culture movement to reclaim their lost heritage and identity.
K. 1950, there was a vote in the Majlis (parliament) to nationalize the petroleum industry.
L. 1950, Prime Minister Dr. Mohammad Mossadeq formed the National Iranian Oil Company
(NIOC); this nationalized Iranian oil and the money began to return to the Iranian people.
14

Pakistan believes by funding terrorist organizations that the international community will continue to offer financial aid and
resources so long as there is perceived notion that Pakistan is actually using the financial assistance to combat terrorism.
15
Human Wave Attacks, also known as Human Sea Attacks, is an offensive infantry tactic in which an attacking force conducts
an unprotected frontal assault with densely concentrated infantry formations against the enemy line, which is intended to
overrun the defenders by engaging in melee combat.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 6 of 18

M. 1953, a coup dtat led by the British and US intelligence services ousted the democratic
Mossadeq government and reinstalled the Shah as the ruling monarch of Iran; this was known as
Operation Ajax.
N. 1953, U.S. CIA Army Colonel was sent to Iran to assemble the nucleus of a new intelligence
organization.
O. 1954, a new oil agreement was established that divided profits equally between the NIOC and a
multinational consortium that had replaced the AIOC.
P. 1955, a permanent team of five career CIA officers, which included Norman Schwarzkopf, began
training personnel for a secret, Iranian intelligence organization; the CIA has now openly
confirmed that they went as far as training Nazi torture techniques.
Q. 1956, the secret, intelligence agency was reorganized and given the name Sazman-e Ettela-at va
Amniyat-e Keshvar (SAVAK); they had full power to sensor the media and to use torture
techniques for the political dissidents they routinely hunted down and arrested.
R. 1961, the SAVAk began a campaign of arresting political figures who spoke out against the Shah.
S. 1963, Ayatollah Khomeini was arrested after speaking out against the Shah.
T. 1964, Ayatollah Khomeini was re-arrested and sent into exile where he remained for 14 years
until the revolution; mass riots ensued and the killed more than 400 people.
U. 1965, Khomeini began sending religious propaganda/contraband into Iran.
V. 1971, the SAVAK began a brutal campaign to suppress all anti-Shah movements; they tortured,
kidnapped, and even killed countless individuals.
W. 1973, Iran signed a new 20-year concession with the consortium.
X. 1975, Khomeinis activists began a wave of demonstrations against the Shah.
Y. 1976, the Shah had accumulated upward of one billion dollars in oil revenue ; his family
including sixty-three princes and princesses had accumulated between five and twenty billion
dollars.
Z. 1977, anti-Shah oppositionist groups began to form whole organizations and started mass
protests to publicly denounce the regime and call for an Islamic Revolution. As the SAVAK
became more and more brutal with their resolve to control political dissidents, the entire nation
began to rapidly destabilize.
AA. 1978, Khomeinis oppositionist-movement began to openly protest to overthrow the Shahs
regime.
BB. 1979, the Islamic Revolution begins:
1. The Shah flees the country on January 17
2. Khomeini returned to Iran on February 01
3. By February 11, revolts spread throughout the military; Khomeini declares Jihad
against those soldiers who would not surrender. There was a mass exodus of the senior
political leaders of the Shahs regime as well as senior military members; those who did
not flee were killed.
4. On March 30, the Shahs monarchy was replaced with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
5. On November 04, a group of Iranian students seized U.S. embassy personnel, labeling
the embassy of den of CIA spies. They accused its personnel of being CIA agents
plotting to overthrow the revolutionary government, as they had done with Mossadeq
in 1953. While the student ring-leaders had not asked for permission from Khomeini to
seize the embassy, Khomeini none-the-less supported the embassy takeover after
hearing of its success. 52 hostages were held for 444 days despite a myriad of

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 7 of 18

unsuccessful attempts by the Jimmy Carter administration 16 to negotiate their release or

to rescue them.
CC. 1980, an eight-year war between Iran and Iraq breaks out17. The leader of Iraq Saddam Hussein
decided to take advantage of the disorder in the wake of the Iranian Revolution and its
unpopularity with Western governments. Since the once-strong Iranian military had been
disbanded during the revolution, Saddam sought to expand Iraqs access to the Persian Gulf by
acquiring territories that Iraq had claimed earlier during the Shahs rule.
DD. 1982, Iranian forces managed to push the Iraqi army back into Iraq. At the culmination of the
war, Iran suffered upwards of 1,000,000 casualties due to Iraqi chemical attacks and from its own
human wave campaign to clear mine fields and carryout melee attacks on divisions of Iraqi tanks.
EE. 1986, Iran Contra Affair the Reagan administration was caught facilitating arms deals with
Iran18.
III.

Pan-Arabism and the beginning stages of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT)
Since the inception of the Middle East, roughly the 1950s to the present day, a myriad of fundamentalist
ideologies have burgeoned amid modernist movements, which has caused a dichotomy between neoIslamists and Islamic preservationists; this, in turn, has resulted in an overwhelming uncertainty and
among non-Islamic societies, or what Islamists label as the decadent West this is known as the
Clash of Civilizations.
In like manner to the Deobandi sect of Islam, radicalized movements maintain a blanket perspective
which places blame against the West for the downfall of the once great Islamic Empire, and the refuse
to accept the fact that the final breaking point for the Ottoman Empire was their support to the Nazi
movement during WWII. Essentially, their empire was already in a steady decline towards ruin, and they
chose to support the Nazi movement because of shared hatred for the Jewish people.
Moreover, there was a huge paradigm shift during the turn of the 20 th century; the face of the world was
no longer ruled as isolated old world empires, and there was a transition from ancient empires, such as
the Ottomans and Safavids, into the idea of nation states. The end of World War II marked the change
in the historical acceptance of empires, and the allied forces divided up the remnants of the decaying
empires19. However, the creation of the Middle Eastern nations was based upon the political and
economic interests of the British, French, and Russians; the countries actually became mandates, and
therefore had little to no input as to the direction of their respective lands, governments, and economies
given the complexity and diversity of the Semitic peoples and their historical differences, this illustrates

16

The hostage crisis reached a climax when, after failed attempts to negotiate a release, the US military attempted a rescue
operation on April 24, 1980; this was known as Operation Eagle Claw. It was a failed mission, which resulted in the destruction
of two aircrafts and the deaths of eight American servicemen and one Iranian civilian. Because of this, the Iranian government
viewed Jimmy Carter as an ineffective idealist, and knew that his administration would not take further action against Iran.
However, on January 19, 1981, the hostages were formally released into the custody of the United States just minutes after the
new American president Ronald Reagan was sworn into office.
17
The United States backed Saddam Hussein with monetary and military resources.
18
The US was caught red-handed selling weapons to both sides (Iran and Iraq).
19
This division was loosely based on the ethnic and cultural similarities of the indigenous populations, and they too little
consideration to the fact that the former empires had ruled their people through tyranny and fear; most of the tribes and / or
communities had had long standing animosities, so when the British, French, Russians, and et cetera sectioned off the lands
into subjugate states, their foresight for future turmoil determined the now detrimental state of the Middle East and South Asia
(i.e. the creation of Palestine, Israel, Jordon, Kuwait, Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Syria, Algeria, and Egypt).

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 8 of 18

that the precision in the creation of these states was actually a well-planned time bomb that is now
about to explode.
In early 1945, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) and King Abd-al Aziz Ibn Saud of the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia signed a pact stating that so long as the United States existed, it would protect Saudi Arabia
from any aggressor; in return, Saudi Arabia would keep the U.S. and its allies in good favor with any issues
concerning oil. Subsequently, FDR also agreed that the U.S. would not help the Zionists at the expense
of the indigenous Arabs of the Transjordan lands. This is the most important point to remember about
this historical pact.
In 1950, there was a military coup dtat in Egypt by two individuals; the most influential and most
powerful was Gamal Abdul Nasser. (Other than the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, his reign was the single
most pivotal plight in Arab/Islamic history). He rose to power with his philosophy and ideology to make
the Arab people great again: Arab Nationalism, pan-Arabism, and Arab-Socialism were the concepts that
could bring ALL ARABS under one federation, much like the times of the Ottomans. His goal was to solidify
an Arab League of Nations that could repel the Soviet bloc and Western influence.
In order to accomplish this feat, he had to both modernize and secularize Egypt; as such, he could not
afford any opposition or disruption, so he banned all political parties (i.e. the Muslim Brotherhood, et
cetera); however, he continued to back the Baath Party in Syria, Iraq, and the new Palestinian Liberation
Organization (PLO -1969). This Arab nationalist movement, spawned from Islamist jingoism, led to the
1967 Arab-Israeli War, during which the Arab aggressors were defeated and humiliated; most of the
military aid came from the French government.
This next point is the quintessential turn in the movement of the radicalized Islam we see today. When
the war was over, the Islamists declared that their defeat was because the leaders of Syria, Jordon, and
Egypt were un-Islamic and therefore Allah would not allow any progression in the Arab world until they
returned to the fundamental roots of Islam and became pure Muslims once more. The Six-Day War,
as it became known, was the greatest point in history that spawned ideas of global Islamization,
fundamentalism, Anti-Islamic sentiment, and general military-style Islamic extremism. The Muslim world
was faced with an identity crisis and Islamist movements used this defeat as a means to have their
fundamentalist approach become assimilated into every nation in which Islam existed.
The inception of the first real terrorist groups (Egyptian-al Jihad and Gamat Islamiya) created too much
attention and pressure from the outside world, so Nasser sent them to Egypt to study at Wahhabi run
schools in Saudi Arabia; they brought with them Nassers ideology of Arab Nationalism and began to
propose the idea of global Islaminization. The World Muslim League was established, and for the first time
the Wahhabis agreed that their interests had to reach outside of Saudi Arabia in order to return Islam to
the Base (al qaeda) of seventh century Mohammad Islam.
They viewed the crux of the problem to be Western influence, modernization, and globalization, which
started a highly intolerant, anti-Western movement to free Islam from the clutches of Western
capitalism. The United States of America became public enemy number one in the minds of the Arabs.
Zionism, The Crux of the Palestinian and Israeli Conflict

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 9 of 18

It seems that Israel and Iran are gearing up for a war over the quintessential focal point of contemporary
Middle Eastern history, whicj was the United Nations mandate and transformation of Palestine from an
Ottoman Empire territory, containing indigenous Semitic peoples, into the de facto and de jure Zionist
motherland for the European Jewish community.
In 1917, the Balfur declaration, which was a British mandate allowing Zionists immigration into Palestine,
became the pivotal incident and sole reason for the myriad of complications within that region over the
last 90 years or so. European Zionists vied for a Jewish homeland in what they considered to be a
historically significant region for the Jewish community; however, neither the British government or
League of Nations measured the lives of the indigenous people whose heritage and lineage had been
consistent in Palestine since Egyptian and Roman subjugation. The Arab world argues that the Zionists
(Jewish Europeans) had no legal claim over the Palestinian region of the deteriorated Ottoman Empire.
The external Zionist force laid claim to the lands of the indigenous Palestinians, which is the root of the
Israeli-Palestinian issues of the present day. To understand it, one must first understand the foundation of
the Zionist movement and their claim to Palestine, which is loosely based on historical data indicating that
the Jews once inhabited that land. However, based on this claim, they would also have claims to Egypt,
being that their forefathers had existed there as well. Moreover, this would mean that the indigenous
Native Americans could legally file suit against the U.S. government to reclaim the lands that were stolen
from them over a period of about 500 years, but I digress.
Zionism started in Europe as a means for Jews to reclaim the lands of their ancestors, namely Palestine.
They wanted to return to the greatness of their Jewish heritage, and used the post-WWII Nazi movement
to pressure the United Nations into sectioning off the land of Palestine for their new homeland; an
influx of Jewish emigrants flooded that region at a rapid pace. Because it was viewed as a second
exodus for the Jews, the elite Zionists wanted to promote a strictly Jewish state. To do this, they expelled
indigenous peasant farmers from their lands, forbid them from becoming laborers, and then established
policies to treat them a secondary citizens; this caused the first Palestinian revolt.
The indigenous, Arab (Muslim) Palestinians viewed this as an invasion of their land because, just like the
Jewish people, the Arab-Palestinian ancestry could be traced as far back as written record will allow; they
too are the decedents of the Judeo-Christian patriarch, Abraham, and therefore are of the same Semitic
blood as the Jews themselves, ergo, they are the same people with different religions. However, the
Muslim Palestinians remained in Palestine after the Jewish Palestinians fled to Europe during the
crusades.
Because the Jewish people had abandoned their homeland, the Muslim world feels that the Israeli
Zionists have no claim or rights to Palestine, which means that the United Nations had no authority to
mandate Zionist rights over the lands, nor the ability to expel the indigenous tenants (the Muslims Arabs)
from a home that was historically and legally theirs.
However, after receiving authority to repopulate Palestine, wealthy Zionists were determined to dismiss
United Nation and British mandates regarding the indigenous Palestinians, and began a series of brutal
rules and regulations to drive them out of Israel.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 10 of 18

The Muslim world feels the West sanctioned the invasion of Palestine as well as the anti-Arab
treatment promoted by the Zionist government; this is the core to all of the problems throughout the
Middle East, and well as part of the fuel for todays radical Islamic movements.
IV.

The Start of World War III

The war in Afghanistan began as an end result of a multi-dimensional convergence of conflicting foreign
policies and radical fundamental movements that had been orchestrated by very powerful individuals that
operated behind the scenes; its roots began prior to the 20th century, and then erupted at the turn of the
21st century on September 11th, 2001. The timeline below outlines all of the major event that have these
elitists shape the face of Islamic radicalism over the last two centuries:
A. 1807, the Great Game between Russia and Britain begins; it lasts until roughly 1917 20.
B. 1893, the Durand line was drawn and Afghanistan was created as a buffer zone between the
Russian and British empires.
C. 1917, the Balfour declaration allowed the Zionist movement to begin populating the British
mandated territories o Palestine.
D. 1918, United Nations partition plan for Palestine, which was the planned termination of the
British mandate over Palestine and recommended the its partition into two states (one Jewish
and one Arab) with the Jerusalem-Bethlehem area being under special international protection
administered by the United Nations.
E. 1923, the Muslim Brotherhood was established in Egypt.
F. 1945, United States and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia sign pact oil for protection.
G. 1946, the Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union begins.
H. 1947, Pakistan partitions itself from India over 1,000,000 Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs were
killed during mass protests and riots; a series of wars and conflicts occurred over the net few
decades.
I. 1948, Israel is created from Palestinian land 21.
J. 1948, first Arab-Israeli War the armies of Egypt, Trans-Jordon, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Lebanon, and
Syria invade Israel and fought until 1949.
K. 1950, military coup dtat in Egypt pan-Arab nationalism movement spreads throughout the
Middle East.
L. 1952, Nasser suppresses the Muslim Brotherhood and a large group go to Saudi Arabia to
22
study Islam under the tutelage of Wahhabi clerics .
M. 1953, US and British run coup dtat in Iran and topple their democratic republic; the reinstate
the Persian monarchy with the brutal Shah.
N. 1967, Six-Day-War Egypt, Jordan, and Syria invade Israel, but were shortly defeated.
O. 1979, Iran begins its Islamic Revolution to rid its country of Western influence; the Soviet Union
invades Afghanistan and the US begins Operation Cyclone, which funded Osama Bin Laden to
begin a decade of combating the Soviets (staging from Pakistan) alongside the Afghan
Mujahadeen.

20

During this period, the British and Russians sought to expand their empires and created buffer zones between
their territories as to alleviate any direct contact with each other (i.e. Afghanistan).
21
This is something akin to the UN giving Mexico authority to reclaim California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas
based on the historical fact that it used to belong to the Mexican people.
22
Until this point in history, the Wahhabis never wanted to export Islam outside of Saudi Arabia.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 11 of 18

P.
Q.
R.
S.

T.
U.

V.
W.

X.
Y.
Z.

AA.
BB.
CC.
DD.

1980, Ayman al-Zawahiri studies the Iranian Revolution and helps establish the Egyptian Islamic
Jihad Movement; Iraq invades Iran and war23 between the two countries lasts until 1988.
1988, Al Qaeda was formed Bin Laden wanted to take on a larger military role, so he and his
Arab Jihadists spit from the Afghan Mujahadeen.
1989, Soviets withdraw from Afghanistan and their government spirals down into ruin; all foreign
aid to Pakistan and Afghanistan is discontinued.
1990, Bin Laden returns home to Saudi Arabia as a hero of Jihad; the first Gulf war occurs Iraq
invades Kuwait and the US deploys to Saudi Arabia 24 to fight against the invasion; Osama Bin
Laden begins this Jihad against the West25.
1991, the Soviet Union Collapses; the first Gulf War ends.
1992, Bin Laden and Al Qaeda establish training camps in the Sudan; the Afghan Najibullah
regime ends and warlords, such as Hekmatyar and Haqqani, engulf all of Afghanistan in a bloody
civil war26.
1993, Ramzi Yousef (Al Qaeda operative) uses a truck bomb to attack the World Trade Center in
New York City.
1996, Mullah Omar, as student from a Deobandi Madrasa, and other Pakistani Taliban invade
Kandahar Afghanistan; their repressive regime brings Afghanistan back to a 7 th century Islamic
State. Bin Laden publicly announces a fatwa for jihad against all Western nations in order to rid
their presence from all areas in which Muslims existed.
1998, Al Qaeda bombs US Embassies in the major East African cities of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,
and Nairobi27. Pakistan develops nuclear weapons.
2000, Al Qaeda militants in Yemen bombed the U.S.S. Cole in a suicide attack, killing 17 U.S.
sailors and damaging the vessel.
2001, two commercial airliners were deliberately flown into the World Trade Center towers, a
third into the pentagon, fourth originally intended to target the U.S. capitol crashed in a
field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The U.S. and its allies invade Afghanistan to rid the country of
Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorists.
2002, India and Pakistan and Pakistan mobilize 1,000,000 troops along their border
2003, the US and its allies invade Iraq under the assertion that Saddam Hussein was preparing to
deploy weapons of mass destruction.
2005, Afghanistan begins to destabilize and coalition forces become entrenched in guerrilla
warfare.
2011, Osama Bin Laden was killed in Abbottabad Pakistan by a team of Navy Seals; Pakistan
begins to mobilize troops on the Afghan border on the Afghan border and begins to break ties
with the United States and its allies. Israel begin publicly denouncing Irans nuclear program and
vies for a coalition to invade Iran.

23

The united States sold weapons to both sides (the Iran Contra Affair).
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia knew Saddam Hussein would not stop at Kuwait and reminded the US of the pact signed during
the FDR administration. Bin Laden insisted he (and Al Qaeda) could defend his countrymen and to not allow infidels in the
holy lands. The Saudi Arabian monarchy dismissed Bin Laden, and turned to the US for protection. Bin Laden publicly
denounces this act and began efforts to attack the West.
25
The FBI raided the New Jersey home of El Sayyid, an associate operative Ali Mohamed, discovering copious evidence of
terrorist plots, including plans to blow up New York City skyscrapers. This marked the earlier discovery of Al Qaeda terrorist
plans outside of Muslim countries.
26
The US CIA supported and funded Hekmatyar and Haqqani during its 1980s ghost war against the Russians.
27
th
The date of the bombing marked the 8 anniversary of the arrival of American Forces in Saudi Arabia. The FBI placed Bin
Laden on its Ten Most Wanted list.
24

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 12 of 18

In todays world, more and more acts of terrorism are taking place at an accelerated rate. The Global War on
Terror, itself, cannot be traced back to any specific event in history, but it rather a culmination of wellorchestrated events:
The Fall of the Ottoman Empire.
Western imperialism/colonialism.
Ending of empires, introduction of nation states that fall under legal systems based on
trade/corporate law, and the establishment of super power nation states to control the global
society.
Collision of opposing interests between super powers.
The use of super-power-sponsored guerrilla contras and secret-intelligence-agency-sponsored coup
dtats as a method of foreign policy to align opposing governments.
Radicalization off Islam through pan-Arab nationalist movement.
Propagation of Jihad (holy war) against the West and mass utilization of suicide bombing and other
neo-Islamist guerrilla warfare tactics.
The use of news agencies and social media as a way to spread propaganda.
Another aspect to take into consideration is the multi-hundred-billion dollar drug trade from Southwest Asia. All
involved stand to lose a considerable amount of monetary resources.
V.

Islam as a Political Western Tool

Islamic fundamentalism fuels the global Muslim communitys opposition to the West, and the Wests
opposition to radical Islam further fuels its discontent and violent resolve. There is no way around it, the
West must confront this fierce wave of religious intolerance with the same level of destruction in which it
operates.
Islam is Not the Problem
First and foremost, it needs to be said that the religion of Islam is not the problem; the assholes from the
countries in which it exists are the problem. These assholes want to make everyone else accommodate
their religion while concurrently vocalizing their disdain and intolerance for other religions. While it is true
a majority of the 1.3 billion Muslims on the planet hold the violent Islamic dick-monkeys in the same
regard that we hold the ass-pirates from the Westborough Baptist Church, most of them choose silence
over speaking out, which is just as bad, because they fear the violent backlash from the radicalized
assholes.
The crux of the matter is the immigrant Muslims in Europe, Canada, the UK, Australia, the US, and any
other civilized societies think "freedom of religion" means they have the right to push their religion onto
everyone else. This diaspora of ethnically diverse Muslims has fled the "oppression" of their own
countries of origin to settle into "free nations". They have never had true freedom and do not know
what to do with it, so so they revert back to the barbaric nature of the lands from whence they came.
They do not understand freedom, having never had it, and believe it means they have the freedom to
persecute others and that acts of terror are nothing more than "freedom of expression".
You see, the word Muslim simply means one who is enlightened and believes in the one God - meaning
the God of Abraham (Yahweh if you will). Technically speaking, to them, Jews and Christians are
considered "Muslims" because they are part of the Abrahamic trifecta of faiths that believes in one God.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 13 of 18

However, since the 7th century the assholes of the desert have bastardized the belief structure of Islam
and have brainwashed the masses into thinking the whole world is full of apostates that need to be
brought back to the light. They have completely lost sight of the roots of their religion and have turned
violent because that is their true nature. They were violent assholes before Mohammad smoked some
dope and had his visions in a cave. They treated their women like property and killed others who
disagreed with their (then) polytheistic belief structures. Mohammad waged war on the Meccans and
Medinans when they refused to stop worshiping multiple deities and believe in Abraham's one God. In
short, they were violent assholes long before Islam came to town; Islam just gave them a common bond
to band together and take control.
We should think of Islamic Imams in the same manner as the Puritan pastors that used to burn women at
the stake for being witches. See, there are 1.3 billion Muslims out there, and the Qu'ran is written in
Arabic, much like the Bible used to be written in Latin and most people had to rely on priests to translate
and interpret for them; it is the same in Islam. I would venture to say that 90% of Muslims cannot read or
understand Arabic, so they have to rely on their holy clerics to translate and interpret for them.
Clerics may go to Mecca, study the Qu'ran, and then return to their countries of origin to "preach the
gospel". Once they have returned home, young men study under their tutelage and mostly receive a
biased version of the Qu'ran. The then newly learned clerics teach other would-be clerics wanting to
study the Quran. It becomes just like of like a photocopy on an old Xerox machine. The first copy is not
too good, so the copies of the copies of the copies are even worse and vaguely resemble the original. That
is what Islam is today. It is a Xerox'd copy of a copy of a copy that does not resemble the original.
To make matters worse, as I said most Muslims do not understand Arabic, these radicalized Imams only
teach portions of the Qu'ran and only give their interpretation. It is like teaching a monkey to recite
Plutonian discourse with sign language; it does not mean the silly little bastard understands it. In likeness,
these Imams do not really understand the shit version of Islam they learned from whatever witch-doctor
of the village taught it to them, so they just make shit up on the fly. They have knowledge, but not true
understanding.
Demonizing the West simply make it easier for them to create a cohesive bond of hatred for their
mindless parishioners. That is why Islam is violently erupting. Did you ever watch Borat the movie? The
whole country had a mindset of Jews and when he left his country, he thought Jews were goblins that laid
eggs to procreate. Same premise with Islam. The Muslims of the world have been brainwashed into
thinking the "West" is the "Great Satan" and that we are all over-sexualized degenerates because they
only see us through the movies Hollywood puts out for world consumption. When these brainwashed
people leave their backward ass countries, they do not want to assimilate into the "Western Demon"
culture they have been brought up to believe in. They segregate themselves and think they have to
defend their lives and religion from a demon horde.
I will say, some of the Muslims do assimilate into our Western culture, generally after visiting the local
neighborhood Hooters and sampling a double Western Cheeseburger from Wendy's. They began to
realize they have been duped like the clams from Alice in Wonderland and start to see the bullshit they
were brought up to believe. However, a large majority use the secularism of Europe and the US as a target
for simple-minded assholes who just want an enemy to fight.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 14 of 18

Jihadists Have Been Duped

First and foremost, the Arabic word Jihad is often translated as holy war, but a more accurate translation
is holy struggle. From a purely linguistic sense, the word Jihad means struggling or striving. There are
two different, unrelated words that mean war. In a religious sense, as described by the Quarn and
teachings of the Prophet Mohammed, Jihad means striving for the benefit of the community or the
restraint of personal sins. It can refer to internal as well as external efforts to be a good Muslim, or
believer; it is a religious duty.
According to the Quran, if Jihad is required to protect the faith against those persecuting Mulims, it
MUST be performed by using legal, diplomatic, economic, or political means FIRST. If there is NO
PEACEFUL ALTERNATIVE, Islam allows the use of force, but there are STRICT RULES OF ENGAGEMENT.
Innocents -- such as women, children, or invalids -- must never be harmed, and any peaceful overtures
from the enemy MUST BE ACCEPTED. Moreover, according to the Quran, not everyone can declare Jihad.
The religious military campaign has to be declared by a proper authority, advised by scholars who say
the religion and people are under threat and violence and it is imperative to defend them. So which of
their people are under threat of duress and violence? They are operating under the Fatwa that Osama Bin
Laden issued because of infidels in the holy lands. For the record, Saudi Arabia asked the U.S. to help
defend them from Saddam Hussein, and the last time I checked, he was a Muslim. In reality, they started
a holy war with the West because another Muslim was killing their Muslim countrymen and the U.S.
was asked to help.
Furthermore, the Prophet Mohammed told his followers returning from a military campaign: "This day we
have returned from the minor Jihad to the major Jihad." This means that returning from armed battle is
easy, returning to a peaceful battle for self-control and betterment is much more difficult. It is quite
apparent, each time they put suicide vests on children, they are failing at the major Jihad.
Lastly and most important, JIHAD IS NOT A DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST OTHER RELIGIONS. In fact,
the Quran specifically refers to Jews and Christians as "people of the book" (Surah 2:62 for anyone
wanting to check their pocket Qurans) and they should be PROTECTED AND RESPECTED. All three faiths
worship the same God the God of Abraham.
These radicalized Jihadists are nothing more than apostates to their religion and are jingoists at best.

VI.

The Rise of the New World Order

The behind-the-scene puppet masters want a globally divisive society because it makes it easier to control
everyone though organized conflict rather than using reason and logic. Hatred and fear is a much easier
catalyst through which they can expedite their political bullshit and systems of control.
First and foremost, if I have to explain my point, then you are already too blind and cannot be saved, but
then you think about radical Islam, they assholes that feed off of conflict, they need it to survive. That is
why they drafted the Qu'ran the way they did. They knew people would not accept their bullshit and
would resist, so they formed their religion around a defensive posture that is driven by conflict, which
fuels its need to defend its very existence.

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 15 of 18

On a repetitive and more frequent basis, I find myself trying to provide reason and logic to people that are
so consumed with their iPhone 6 and Starbucks that they cannot see the world society collapsing around
them. Sure, generations passed often speculated that we could not sustain our greedy appetites for
material possessions and convenience, but they never thought it would occur at such an accelerated rate.
Well, the chickens have come to roost and it is now time to pay our pound of flesh.
The game is up. We have let corporations rape our planet of its natural resources, pollute our
environment, and rob us of our money. Our response? Blind apathy. Our penance, a dystopian society of
magnanimous proportions so far beyond our comprehension that to speak of the impending doom simply
gets you labeled as a nut job.
Here is a fun fact, in 1900, only 14% of the worlds population were city-dwellers. Three years ago, that
figure had risen to 50%. By 2050, the United Nations predict that 70% of people will be urbanites. With
over-population (at a pandemic rate) we crowd ourselves together and fight for any scraps that fall from
the bountiful table of corporate America. But what do we get for all our hard work? Smaller and smaller
paychecks that barely cover the food and commodities that we have to buy in order to live? Shrinking
bank accounts as Wall Street fat cats and Hedge-fund Bankers create money for themselves while
simultaneously bankrupting the world which our government then forces us pay back instead of the
greedy businessmen who are at fault? Is it just me, or is that the most insane shit you have ever heard?
Honestly, there is nothing natural about working conditions in this country. Between all the time at the
job, taking care of children, and doing what is required to be a working adult, there is hardly any time left
over for what is the most important of all living life! And when I saying living life, it does not refer to
whatever temporary respite you may take from this insanity while drinking water-downed margaritas at a
bullshit resort in what would otherwise be a third-world country without tourism.
But if work doesnt kill you, we actually sit back in apathy and play with our cheap (distracting) technology
as our governments force oppression down our throats that is disguised as modified freedom. The
fractured central-government of this great nation has no regard for the people from which it has derived
its just powers (which is solely from the consent of the governed who have put them in office), and as it
has seemingly become destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such
form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness. ((Sound familiar?))
Having suffered a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a
design to reduce us under absolute despotism, it is our right, it is our duty, to throw off such Government,
and to provide new guards for our future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these United
States; and such is now the necessity that constrains us to alter our former System of Government. The
history of the present Washington government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having
in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these United States.
Am I part of a small, marginalized group of visionaries that are not blinded by the bullshit teeming from
the shit-pot that has become Washington DC? I could give a laundry list of reasons how our government
has failed us, but drink in this fun fact. Truly, there were a myriad of reasons for our declaration of
independence; however, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, The refusal of King George III to allow the

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 16 of 18

colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the
money-manipulators, was probably the prime cause of the revolution.
The crux of our current economic plight is very similar to that of our founding fathers, wherein our
central authority refuses to produce its own interest-free currency, and forces Americans to borrow
money from a private, central banking system (the Federal Reserve), thus hurling our great nation into
perpetual state of debt from whence there is no recovery.
A failing central banking system notwithstanding, now we the people have further allowed our electedofficials to enact legislation to benefit healthcare-manipulators at the cost of the livelihood of hardworking Americans, which stands to bankrupt our future and push us further towards complete socialism
and economic impoverishment.
OUR FOREFATHERS DID NOT WANT A MONARCHY ON AMERICAN SOIL, SO WHY ARE WE ALLOWING OUR
FREEDOMS TO BE SWINDLED BY A SMALL HANDFUL OF CRIMINALS?
If our elected officials refuse to acknowledge the will of the people, than it is the will of the people that
will soon refuse to acknowledge its central-governments authority to rule. Serving America is a privilege,
not a means to make money and serve special interest groups who rape, pillage, and plunder our rights to
life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I can see the storm coming, but with hope and planning we can navigate around its fury; however, should
we choose to ignore a proper course of action, America will be smashed upon the rocks and sink quickly
beneath the waves of history.
I watch all of this, but when I look around, all I can see is blind apathy from those in my community.
Baffling and absurd, these are the two words that incessantly reverberate in my mind as I watch my fellow
countrymen offer up their freedom and liberties for the illusion of security. Our founding fathers
committed high-treason so that we might be free, but in just over two centuries we have besmirched that
gift and embraced the very type of tyranny they fought to end.
Is it not our dutiful obligation to remove from power any government which has become destructive to its
own end? This Washington-based government now sits in a position of absolute authority; any attempt to
raise arms against the reign of its monarchical body is labeled as an act of terror and is accompanied by
indefinite imprisonment without trial. In essence, the very same patriotic acts our forefathers executed
while laying the foundation of our nation and a government of the people, for the people, and by the
people is held in the same regard as the acts of Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. This new ruling class of
elitist bureaucrats aims to deracinate the fabric of our society and crush our lives with insurmountable
debt and complete, unquestionable allegiance to their crown.
I say it is time we end the reign of these absolutists and take back our nation. I say we can no longer sit in
apathy and watch our ideals and liberties be trampled upon by those whom we have entrusted to
preserve our birthright of true, unadulterated freedom. We, as a collective body of patriotic heretics
much like our founding fathers, must unite and rebel against this Washington-based government, and we
must not let the fear of tyrannical recourse outweigh the need for a radical change in this country. We
must fight as our founding federalist did, and we must rebuild a nation in which everyone equally

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 17 of 18

contributes to the betterment of the union rather than feeding off the hard work of others like a parasitic
plague. We must fight so that the future of our nation does not continue to be outsourced and sold to
other nations for the sake of corporate campaign funding for the pandemic known as career politics. We
must fight to retrieve and preserve the rights our ruling class has stolen from us.
The meaning behind the words we the people have been lost in a sea of complacent apathy. We are the
protectors of freedom in the military, we are the preservers of justice in the police force, we are the
farmers that feed the whole, we are the merchants who provide commerce, WE ARE THE PEOPLE OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and WE are tired of this trodden state of existence. We the people choose
to civil disobedience over blind allegiance to a government that is trying to destroy our nation and
framework of liberty. We the people choose to ignore the authority of absolutists we did not put into
power.
I mean look around at this police state in which we now live; it is appalling at best. The National Gang
Center reported 1,824 gang-related homicides in the United States in 2011. Alarmingly, that same year at
least 1,146 civilians were shot by law enforcement officers with at least 607 fatalities. Essentially, in 2011,
gang members murdered .0013 civilians per capita, which means that police officers killed at least .0008
civilians per capita (nearly 2/3 the rate of murder by gang members). I am not making this shit up, go do
your own research if you dont believe me.
Law enforcement is not synonymous with judge, jury, and executioner; they are there to enforce the
law, not simply carryout executions as they see fit. Each time suspects are killed by police officers they
lose their opportunity to receive legitimate due process. DUE PROCESS, that is a founding principle of
our nation. Why is that no longer the case?
Ill you why, it is because law enforcement is no longer set up to serve and protect the citizens of this
nation. They are posturing themselves for a complete lock-down as a New World Order rises from the
shadows.
Think about how in just over a decade the war on terror has come home; its no longer in distant lands
that have names no one can pronounce. It is here on our front steps and its wreaking havoc on innocent
American lives. The culprit is the militarization of the police. The weapons used in the war on terror
that destroyed Afghanistan and Iraq have made their way to local law enforcement. Police agencies
around the nation possess military-grade equipment, turning officers who are supposed to fight crime and
protect communities into what looks like invading forces from an army. And military-style police raids
have increased in recent years, with one count putting the number at 80,000 such raids last year alone.
The fact is, American policing has become excessively militarized through the use of weapons and tactics
designed for the battlefield wherein US citizens can no longer stand against police agencies that
continually trample our constitutional rights.
In all of this, which is in plain sight everywhere I look, the elitist monarchs of Washington DC have the
audacity to label me a domestic terrorist. Why, because I fought for 6-years in Afghanistan to come
home to see our liberties stripped away, our economy in shambles, and the citizens I fought to protect in
dire need of Robin Hood? If I am a terrorist for using harsh language against the politicians in our failing
government, then so be it!

Rough Draft Outline v1.0

17 JAN 2015

Page 18 of 18