Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Q\ <^jj
'
*-
TT
* *r o
Ornament above
1 Five of these were subsequently presented by Mr. Eisenberg to the Museum
of the American Numismatic Society (ANS 62.10).
2 Cf. P. Balog, The Coinage of the Mamlk Sultans of Egypt (ANS Numismatic
Studies, No. 12, New York, 1964), no. 135, and Second Supplement, p. 394.
S?
3o8
A. N. S. MUSEUM NOTES
Rev.:
^-l
o O
4-Lyl
Ornaments before
p and after
The mint name is preserved on 147 specimens. On no single specimen is the complete date preserved, but there are a sufficient number
with either the digit or the decade or the Century, or two of the three
figures, preserved to leave no doubt whatever about the date, even
where the digit is lacking, particularly s other details show the coins
to be, s remarked, from identical dies. Five specimens are doublestruck, reverse die on obverse, and obverse die on reverse. One specimen is a brockage with retrograde traces of the reverse die on the
reverse and the obverse unaffected.
The eight specimens which I judge to be half dirhems because of
their reduced dianieters (PLATE XLIX, 5) rnge in weight from 1.08
grams to 2.06 grams (1.08, 1.46, 1.75, 1.93, 1.94, 1.97, 2.06, 2.06). The
frequencies of the weights of the dirhems, scaled at intervals of
.20 gr., are s follows:
Weight
1.61-1.80
1.81-2.00
,
>
No. of Specimens
i
i'
2.0I-2.2O
2.2I-2.4O
2.4I-2.6O
2.6I-2.8O
2.8I-3.0O
3.01-3.20
6
14
15
22
64
76
3-21-3-40
3.41-3.60
51
28
3.61-3.80
10
,.
309
Weight
No. o/Specimens
3.81-4.00
5
4.01-4.20
2
4-35
i
4-77
i
The peak therefore is at 3.01-3.20 grams, somewhat above the
figure given by Balog (op.cit., p. 41) for the period (2.80-2.90
grams). The large number of specimens in the groups on either side
of the peak (64 from 2.81-3.00 grams, and 51 from 3.21-3.40 grams)
would suggest that at this time the weight of individual dirhems was
not controlled nearly s accurately s it was in Umayyad and early
*Abbsid days.3
GEORGE C. MILES
3 Cf. G. C. Miles, "Byzantine Miliaresion and Arab Dirhem: some Notes on
their Relationship," ANSMN, IX, 1960, p. 213.
XLIX