Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 40

2139-15

School on Synchrotron and Free-Electron-Laser Sources and their


Multidisciplinary Applications

26 April - 7 May, 2010

X-ray absorption spectroscopy

F. De Groot
Utrecht University
Netherlands

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy


(K edges)

Frank de Groot
Studie: scheikunde in Nijmegen (1982-1986)
Promotie: vaste stof chemie Nijmegen (1991)

Interaction of X-rays with matter

Post-doc: Laboratoire pour l utilisation du rayonnement

XANES and EXAFS

lectromagntique in Parijs (93-94)

XANES analysis
Pre-edge analysis
Resonant Inelastic X-ray Spectroscopy (RIXS)

Post-doc: vaste stof natuurkunde in Groningen (95-98)


Universitair hoofddocent: anorganische chemie Utrecht
- Theorie van rntgenspectroscopie
- Ontwikkelen nieuwe rntgenspectroscopien
- Onderzoek aan heterogene katalysatoren
- Onderzoek aan vaste stoffen

Why XX-ray Absorption?

What do we learn from XAS?

Element specific

Metal valence during synthesis and reaction

Sensitive to low concentrations

Metal coordination

(0.01-0.1 %)

Applicable under extreme conditions


(high-pressure, high temperature, in-situ)

Applicable to gasses, liquids and solids


Combination with microscopy

(very small) nanoparticles/clusters

Metal site symmetry


d-band occupation
(3d, 4d or 5d; metal versus oxide, valence)

Energy positions of empty bands of adsorbates


(CO, H2 on Pt, nature of adsorption site)
20 nm spatial-resolved, 50 ps time-resolved

Interaction of xx-rays with matter 1

Interaction of xx-rays with matter 1

The photon moves towards the atom

The photon meets an electron and is annihilated

Interaction of xx-rays with matter 1

Interaction of xx-rays with matter 1

The electron gains the energy of the photon


and is turned into a blue electron.

The blue electron (feeling lonely) leaves the atom


and scatters of neighbors
or escapes from the sample

Interaction of xx-rays with matter 1

Interaction of xx-rays with matter

The probability of photon annihilation determines


the intensity of the transmitted photon beam

I0
Ek

Interaction of xx-rays with matter


Energy Spectroscopy
Direction Structure
Polarization Magnetism

100

XAFS studies
photoelectric
absorption
Elastic
scattering
(Thompson)
Inelastic
scattering
(Compton)

Mn
Photoelectric

10
Thom pson
Com pton
1
100

1k

10k
Energy (eV)

100k

X-ray absorption and XX-ray photoemission


Excitation of core electrons to empty states.

I(,k,q)
Spectrum given by the Fermi Golden Rule

I(,k,q)

I(Ek,k,)

I XAS ~ f f T1 i

E f Ei !

X-ray absorption and XX-ray photoemission

X-ray absorption and XX-ray photoemission

I(FIXED)

X-ray absorption

X-ray absorption

ln

I0
= c l
It

= 1x ln

X-ray absorption of an atom

I0
It

Lambert-Beer

= absorption coefficient
x = sample thickness
Measure x-ray intensity
before and after sample

X-ray absorption of a molecule

The molecular orbitals of CO

The molecular orbitals of CO

X-ray absorption

X-ray absorption

X-ray absorption
(single particle interpretation)

Excitation of core electrons to empty states.

Spectrum given by the Fermi Golden Rule

Density of States (DOS) is the


integral over k-space of the
band structure.
Core states have no dispersion.

(name Golden Rule given by Fermi; rule itself given by Dirac)

XAS preserves momentum (k)

I XAS ~ f f e r i

Ei !

X-ray absorption

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

2p
2s

Phys. Rev. B.
40, 5715 (1989) / 48, 2074 (1993)

X-ray absorption

Electronic Structure

Phys. Rev. B.
40, 5715 (1989)

Electronic Structure

X-ray absorption: core hole effect


TiSi2

Final State Rule:


Spectral shape of XAS
looks like final state
DOS
Initial State Rule:
Intensity of XAS is given
by the initial state

Phys. Rev. B.
41, 11899 (1991)


     

 
 

 
 



  
 
  
 

 


 
 ! 
! 



  

"        


# 




   




 
    

Luitz et al. EPJ B.


21, 363 (2001)

Nyberg et al. Phys. Rev. B.


60, 7956 (1999)

Taillefumier et al. Phys. Rev. B.


66, 195107 (2002)

(HERFD) K edge XANES

K edge XANES

Element specific DOS


L specific DOS
Dipole selection rule (L= 1)

XANES: qualitative analysis

Edge position gives valence

XANES: qualitative analysis

XANES: qualitative analysis

Edge position gives valence

XANES: qualitative analysis

Edge position gives valence


Pre-edge gives valence
Different slopes
Wong et al.
Phys. Rev. B. 30, 5596 (1984)

XANES: qualitative analysis

Spectral Sharpening
K detected XANES

Normal XANES

Pre-edge intensity gives site symmetry

Sharpened prepre-edge analysis

Sharpened prepre-edge analysis

MnZSM-5 (calcined, RT)

MnZSM-5 (heated to 250C)

0.40

0.40

4-fold
Integrated Intensity (norm.)

Integrated Intensity (norm.)

4-fold
0.35
0.30
3+

2+

Mn

Mn
0.25
0.20
0.15

6-fold
0.10
6539.5

6540.0

6540.5

6541.0

6541.5

0.35
0.30

0.15

6-fold
6540.0

MnZSM-5 (oxidation with N2O)


Integrated Intensity (norm.)

Integrated Intensity (norm.)

3+

Mn

0.25
0.20
0.15

6-fold
6540.5

6541.0

Center Energy (eV)

6542.0

4-fold

0.30

6540.0

6541.5

0.40

4-fold
0.35

0.10
6539.5

6541.0

MnZSM-5 (NO treatment)

0.40

Mn

6540.5

Center Energy (eV)

Center Energy (eV)

2+

Mn

0.20

0.10
6539.5

6542.0

3+

2+

Mn
0.25

6541.5

6542.0

0.35
0.30
3+

2+

Mn

Mn
0.25
0.20
0.15

6-fold
0.10
6539.5

6540.0

6540.5

6541.0

6541.5

6542.0

Center Energy (eV)

XANES: qualitative analysis

XANES: qualitative analysis

L edge of 5d-systems > number of empty 5d states


L edge of 4d-systems > number of empty 4d states

Difference between 5d3/2 and 5d5/2

XANES: qualitative analysis

What do we learn from XANES?


Edge position gives valence
K pre-edge center gives valence
K pre-edge intensity gives site symmetry
L edge intensity gives empty d-states
HERFD-XANES gives details anti-bonding
bands of adsorbates

L edge of 5d-systems > number of empty 5d states


Difference between metal and oxide

Pre-edges structures in 1s XAS


1s1 3dN 4p1

3dN 4p0

Pre-edges structures in 1s XAS


1s1 3dN 4p1

edge

3dN 4p0

1s1 3dN+1 4p0

edge

pre-edge

Pre-edge
and edge
Pre-edges
structures
in 1s XAS
CoIII(acac)

K pre-edge
TM oxides
(LiCoO
Pre-edgesof
structures
in 1s
XAS 2)
1

Co K edge of LiCoO2
edge

low-spin CoIII
3d6 [1A1]
T2g full
Eg empty
pre?
edge

low-spin CoIII
3d6 [1A1]
T2g full
Eg empty
0

7710

7715

7720

7725

Energy (eV)

K pre-edge
TM oxides
(LiCoO
Pre-edgesof
structures
in 1s
XAS 2)

Pre-edges structures in 1s XAS

Co K edge of LiCoO2
edge

pre?
edge

low-spin CoIII
3d6 [1A1]
T2g full
Eg empty
0

7710

7715

7720

7725

Energy (eV)

Selective XAFS

Pre-edges structures in 1s XAS


Mn 4p

Mn 3d

O 2p

O 2s

20

3d5

MnO

K1,3

Mn 3p 45
Mn 3s

K'

80

O 1s

530

Mn 2p

650

Mn 2s

770

Mn 3p

K2,5
K''

O 2s
6460

Mn 1s 6540

6480

6500

6520

O 2p
6540

6560

Energy [eV]

10

K edgestructures
and 1s2pinRIXS
Pre-edges
1s XAS

K pre-edge
of TM in
oxides
Pre-edges
structures
1s XAS

CoIII(acac)
low-spin CoIII
3d6 [1A1]
T2g full
Eg empty

Vanko et al. (submitted)

K pre-edge
TM oxides
(LiCoO
Pre-edgesof
structures
in 1s
XAS 2)

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy


LiCoO2

Co K edge of LiCoO2
edge

pre?
edge

low-spin CoIII
3d6 [1A1]
T2g full
Eg empty

Co 1s > p DOS

7710

7715

7720

7725

Energy (eV)

Juhin et al. (submitted)

Pre-edges structures in
1s XAS

K pre-edge
of TM in
oxides
Pre-edges
structures
1s XAS

LiCoO2

Juhin et al. (submitted)

J. Phys. Cond. Matt. 21, 104207 (2009)

11

Pre-edges structures in
1s XAS

Pre-edges structures in 1s XAS

LiCoO2

Juhin et al. (submitted)

K pre-edge
of TM in
oxides
Pre-edges
structures
1s XAS
1s1 3dN 4p1

Juhin et al. (submitted)

Non-localstructures
screening
Pre-edges
in peaks
1s XAS
1s1 3dN 4p1

edge

edge

1. High valence = strong overlap


2. Metal ion neighbours (M-O-M angle)
3. Metal ion has inversion symmetry

1s13dN
4p(3d-band)

3dN 4p0

non-local
dipole

1s1 3dN+1 4p0 pre-edge


J. Phys. Cond. Matt. 21, 104207 (2009)

Valence selective XAFS


Independent XANES and EXAFS spectra for different
valences in the same system.

1s13dN
4p(3d-band)

non-local

1s1 3dN+1 4p0 pre-edge

3dN 4p0

J. Phys. Cond. Matt. 21, 104207 (2009)

Valence selective XAFS


Chemical Dependence of K Emission
Experiment

Theory

Use chemical shift in the XES emission line with <1 eV


resolution.
1s3p decay gives clearest chemical shifts due to
changing 3p3d exchange with 3d-count.
Note: the center-of-gravity does not shift with valence
because the energy difference between 1s and 3p
core levels is constant

Equal center-of-gravity energies used in calculations!

12

Valence selective XAFS

HERFDHERFD-XANES
measure deep core hole XANES with the resolution of
a shallow core hole
For example 3d metal K edges, 5d metal L edges and
rare earth L edges.
(1) detect adsorbates on Pt or Au,
(2) separate pre-edges from edges
(3) make quadrupole peaks visible.
The overall resolution should be as good as the
shallow core hole, ~0.3 eV.
(HERFD = High-Energy Resolution Fluorescence Detection)

Inorg.
Inorg. Chem.
41, 3121 (2002)

HERFDHERFD-XANES

Recent data on Pt catalyst with and without CO


(Olga Sofanova, Moniek Tromp et al, Southampton, subm.)

13

X-ray absorption

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy


(L edges)

Excitation of core electrons to empty states.

Spectrum given by the Fermi Golden Rule

I XAS ~ f f e r i

Oxygen K edge

Ei !

Electronic Structure

2p
2s

Phys. Rev. B.
40, 5715 (1989) / 48, 2074 (1993)

Oxygen K edge

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy


Fermi Golden Rule:
IXAS = |<f|dipole| i>|2 [E=0]
Single electron (excitation) approximation:
IXAS = |<empty|dipole| core>|2

1. Neglect <vv|1/r|vv> (many body effects)


2. Neglect <cv|1/r|cv> (multiplet effects)

multiplet effects

2p XX-ray absorption

Strong overlap of core and valence


wave functions

3d

<2p3d|1/r|2p3d>

Single Particle model breaks down


2p3/2
2p1/2

I XAS ~ 2 p 5 3d 6 e r 3d 5

Ei !

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

DFT:

Single Particle:

1s edges

1s edges

Multiplets:

No Unified
Interpretation!

2p, 3s, 3p edges

(WIEN, FEFF, GN-XAS


..)

Multiplets:
2p, 3s, 3p edges
(TT-MULTIPLETS)

2p XAS of TiO2

Charge Transfer Multiplet program


Ti4+

Used for the analysis of XAS, EELS,


Photoemission, Auger, XES,

Put Ti4+ in Ion


Set Autoplot ON
Press Run

ATOMIC PHYSICS

GROUP THEORY

MODEL HAMILTONIANS

Atomic Multiplet Theory

Atomic Multiplet Theory

=E

H = 2pmi + Ze
+
ri
2

pairs

=E
e2
rij

+ (ri ) l i si
N

H = 2pmi + Ze
+
ri
2

X
N

Kinetic Energy
Nuclear Energy
Electron-electron interaction
Spin-orbit coupling

Atomic Multiplet Theory (ground state)


2 S +1

LJ | re12 |2 S +1LJ = f k F k + g k G k
2

pairs

e2
rij

pairs

e2
rij

+ (ri ) l i si
N

Kinetic Energy
Nuclear Energy
Electron-electron interaction
Spin-orbit coupling

Atomic Multiplet Theory (core hole)


2 S +1

LJ | re12 |2 S +1LJ = f k F k + g k G k
2

Electron Correlation of Valence States

H ATOM =

Core Valence Overlap

+ (ri ) li si

H ATOM =

pairs

Valence Spin-orbit coupling

e2
rij

+ (ri ) li si
N

Core Spin-orbit coupling

Multiplet Effects

2p XAS of TiO2
Ti4+

1s

0.07

2s

2p

3s

13

3p

Put Ti4+ in Ion


Set Autoplot ON
Press Run

17

Core Valence Overlap

17

Core Spin-orbit coupling

2p XAS of TiO2
Ti4+

2p XAS of TiO2
Ti4+

CTM4XAS:
Error for 3d0 systems in
version 3

Put Ti4+ in Ion


Set Autoplot ON
Suppress Sticks ON

Use version 2.5 for


3d0 systems
(Will be solved in
version 3.1)

Term Symbols
Term symbols of a
3P0

1P 3P ,
1
1
3D
1

2p53d1

3x3

configuration

1.0

3P
2
1D 3D
2
2
3F
2

[1

Atomic multiplets

4
4x5

Ti4+
1.0

1.0

3D
3

Slater integral reduction:

1F 3F
3
3

3F
4

1]
1

3x7

1x9

The Fdd, Fpd and Gpd Slater integrals


can be reduced to any other value.
The default value is 1.0 which implies
atomic values.

Ground state: 3d0: L=S=J=0 1S0


Selection rule: Final state must have J
J=1

2p XAS of TiO2
Ti4+
0.5 0.5

2p XAS of TiO2
Ti4+

0.5

0.0 0.0

Put Ti4+ in Ion


Set Autoplot ON
Set Expert options
ON
Add 40 40 40 for
Fdd, etc.

0.0

Put Ti4+ in Ion


Set Autoplot ON
Set Slater integral
reduction to 0.0

3d0 XAS calculation

2p XAS of TiO2
Ti4+
0.0 0.0

0
0.0




0.0



3dN XAS calculation

Hunds rules
 

 

Term symbols with maximum spin S are lowest in energy,

  

Among these terms:

  




Term symbols with maximum L are lowest in energy

  




In the presence of spin-orbit coupling, the lowest term has

  

J = |L-S| if the shell is less than half full

  

J = L+S if the shell is more than half full

  
  !

3d1 has 2D3/2 ground state


3d9 has 2D5/2 ground state

3d2 has 3F2 ground state


3d8 has 3F4 ground state

Give the Hunds rule ground states for 3d1 to 3d9

Term Symbols and XAS


Fe atom:
Ground state:
3d6 (4s2) 5D j=4

 !



 

  














 










 
















  






  




Term Symbols and XAS


Fe atom:
Ground state:
Final state:
Dipole transition:

3d6 (4s2)
2p53d7
p-symmetry

5D, etc.
3d6-configuration:
2p53d7-configuration: 110 states
1P
p-transition:

ground state symmetry: 5D


5D 1P = 5PDF
transition:
possible final states:

j=4
j= 3,4, 5
j=+1,0,-1
5D
4

68 states

Exercise

Term Symbols and XAS

Calculate the atomic multiplet spectrum of the 2p


XAS spectrum of an iron atom (use Fe2+)

Fe atom:
Ground state:

3d6 (4s2) 5D j=4

Run CTM4XAS with Autoplot ON.


Do a second calculation with the 3d spin-orbit
coupling set to zero.

Choose an appropriate name;


the program saves the rcn, rcg, rac, ban, plo and
xy files with this name.

2p XAS of NiO

5D
0

5D

5D
4

Term Symbols and XAS

Ni2+

Put Ni2+ in Ion


Set Autoplot ON

NiII ion in NiO:


Ground state:
Final state:
Dipole transition:
3d8-configuration:
2p53d9-configuration:
p-transition:

3d8
2p53d9
p-symmetry
1S 1D, 3P,1G, 3F
,
2P2D = 1,3PDF
1P

ground state symmetry: 3F


3F 1P = 3DFG
transition:
two possible final states: 3D, 3F

3d XAS of La2O3
""# $  $ "%  &
'
   (

j=4
j=0,1,2,3,4
j=+1,0,-1
3F
4
3D ,3F ,3F 1 F
3
3
4,
3

3d XAS of La2O3
   &
),,,
,-

 ),,,
,-.

'    ( (

' Transition </01%/),),2

'
    &

'  34  $ 

'   &)*+ 


' ),,,
,-  ),,,
,-.

3d XAS of La2O3

3d XAS of La2O3

Thole et al.
PRB 32, 5107 (1985)

3d XAS of Nd

Crystal Field Effects


eg states

NdIII ion in Nd metal


Ground state: 4f3
Final state: 3d94f4

t2g states

Thole et al.
PRB 32, 5107 (1985)

2p XAS of TiO2

Octahedral crystal field splitting


Ti4+

metal ion
in free space

in symmetrical field

in octahedral ligand field

eg

Put Ti4+ in Ion


Set Autoplot ON
Press Run

x2-y2 z2

t2g
yz

xz

xy

x2-y2 yz z2 xz xy

2p XAS of TiO2

Crystal Field Effects in CTM

Ti4+

Crystal field effect:


+ 2.5 for 10Dq
+ Split ON
+ 0.5 Lorentzian L2
+ 467 split energy

2.5

7 = 2.13 eV

0.5
467

Crystal Field Effects


#

Crystal Field Effect on XAS

#456 3 7

8



9%

8%%

8%9%%

J in SO3

Deg.

Branchings

in Oh

Deg.

A1

A1

3T1

A2

4E, 4T2

T1

3A2, 3T1,3T2

T2

A1, E, T1, T2

12

Deg.

Branchings

A1

3T1

4E, 4T2

3A2, 3T1,3T2

A1, E, T1, T2

12

<1S0|dipole|1P1> goes to <A1|T1|T1>

Effect of 10Dq on XAS:3d0

Crystal Field Effect on XAS

J in SO3

25

<1S0|dipole|1P1> goes to <A1|T1|T1>

Comparison with Experiment

2p XAS of TiO2
Ti4+
0.0 0.0 0.0

2.5

0.5
467

Turning multiplet effects off

Effect of 10Dq on XAS:3dN

High-spin or Low-spin
V3+

10Dq > 3J
(d4 and d5)
1.5

10Dq > 2J
(d6 and d7)

2p XAS of Mn2+

2p XAS of Mn2+

Mn2+

High-spin: 10Dq =
1.2
Low-spin: 10Dq =
3.0
1.2

2p XAS of Mn2+

3d spin-orbit coupling

Effect of 10Dq on XAS:3dN

Crystal Field Multiplets


1

3d82p53d9

Normalized Intensity

Ni2+, cubic field


neglect 2p s
neglect 4sp, O2p

0
850

855

860
865
Energy (eV)

870

10

Metal L edges
5

3d

Normalized Intensity

Exercise

3d
2
3d

3d
4
3d

3d
6
3d

3d
8
3d

Calculated L-edges
3dN2p53dN+1

Calculate the crystal field multiplet spectrum of


the 2p XAS spectrum of all divalent transition
metal ions from Ca to Cu. Use 10Dq=1.2 eV.

Single configuration
Atomic values for
intra-atomic interactions
Cubic crystal field of 1.2 eV

Run CTM4XAS with Autoplot ON.


Do a calculation with and without the 3d spin-orbit
coupling set to zero.

3d

Which TM2+ ions are sensitive to 3d spin-orbit


coupling? Explain

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Relative Energy (eV)

Exercise

2p XAS of CoO
Co2+

Calculate the crystal field multiplet spectrum of


the 2p XAS spectrum of all divalent transition
metal ions from Ca to Cu.

0.0

+ with and without


3d spin-orbit (1.0
and 0.0)

1.2

Use 10Dq=1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 eV.


Which TM2+ ions are very sensitive to the crystal
field strength? Explain

Charge Transfer Effects

Charge Transfer Effects

MnO: Ground state: 3d5 + 3d6L


Energy of 3d6L: Charge transfer energy

3d6L

3d5

2p53d7L
+U-Q

2p53d6

Ground state of a transition metal system


3dN at every site
Charge fluctations

11

Charge Transfer Effects

Hubbard U for a 3d8 ground state:


U= E(3d7) + E(3d9) E(3d8) E(3d8)
Ligand-to-Metal Charge Transfer (LMCT):
= E(3d9L) E(3d8)

Charge Transfer Effects


2+U

3U-2

15
Energy (eV)

Energy (eV)

15

Charge Transfer Effects in XAS

10

U-

+U-Q

10

10

Charge Transfer Effects in XPS

10

Charge transfer effects in XAS and XPS


Transition metal oxide: Ground state: 3d5 + 3d6L
Energy of 3d6L: Charge transfer energy

15
Energy (eV)

3d6L
XPS
10

-Q

2p53d5
3d5

XAS

-Q

Ground State

2p53d7L
+U-Q

2p53d6L
6

2p53d6

10

12

2p XAS of Ni2+
Ni2+

2.0
6.0
7.0

1.0

Charge Transfer Effects in XAS


NiO: Ground state: 3d8 + 3d9L
Energy of 3d9L: Charge transfer energy

3d9L

Charge Transfer Multiplets of Ni2+


=3

=9

=0

=6

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

Spectral shape:
(1) Multiplet effects
(2) Charge Transfer

2p53d10L
+U-Q

2p53d9

3d8

Charge transfer

J. Elec. Spec.
67, 529 (1994)

Exercise

13

Exercise
Try to reproduce the Cu 2p XAS spectrum of Cs2KCuF6
The symmetry is octahedral;
Use T(eg) = 2.0, T(eg)=2* T(t2g) and Udd-Upd=-1.0 eV.
Optimize 10Dq and .

Exercise
Try to reproduce the Cu 2p XAS spectrum of Cs2KCuF6
The symmetry is octahedral;
Use T(eg) = 2.0, T(eg)=2* T(t2g) and Udd-Upd=-1.0 eV.
Optimize 10Dq and .

Try to reproduce the Cu 2p XAS spectrum of


La2Li1/2Cu1/2O4
The symmetry is square planar;
Use Ds=0.3, T(b1) = 3.0, T(a1) = 1.73, T(b2) = 1.5, T(e) =
1.05* and Udd-Upd=-1.0 eV.
Optimize 10Dq and .

Exercise
Try to reproduce the Cu 2p XAS spectrum of
La2Li1/2Cu1/2O4
The symmetry is square planar;
Use Ds=0.3, T(b1) = 3.0, T(a1) = 1.73, T(b2) = 1.5, T(e) =
1.05* and Udd-Upd=-1.0 eV.
Optimize 10Dq and .

Exercise

Calculate all spectra for NiO

2p XAS, 3p XAS, 1s (pre-edge) XAS


1s, 2s and 3s XPS
2p and 3p XPS
1s2p and 1s3p XES

X-MCD
Cu2+: 3d9

X-MCD

14

Exercise

X-MCD
MCD

mJ=-5/2
to
mJ=-3/2

MCD

no LS

Run CTM4XAS for Cu2+ in C4 symmetry, with a


magnetic field (M) of 1 meV; Plot the XAS spectrum
and the MCD spectrum;
Run CTM4XAS for Cu2+ in C4 symmetry, with a
magnetic field (M) of 1 meV and with the 3d spin-orbit
coupling set to 0.0; Plot the XAS spectrum and the
MCD spectrum;

Exercise
Run CTM4XAS for Cu2+ in C4v symmetry, with a
magnetic field (M) of 1 meV, adding a crystal field
value 10Dq of 0.3 eV.; Plot the XAS spectrum and the
MCD spectrum;
Perform a number of calculations for varying values of
10Dq, in steps of 0.3 eV from 0.0 to 1.5 eV. What
does one observe for the XAS and MCD spectra?

X-MCD
MCD

no LS

MCD

+ crystal field

Perform a calculation for negative values of 10Dq, for


example -0.3, -0.5 and -0.9 eV. What does one
observe? Explain.

RIXS

RIXS

Butorin
J. Elec. Spec 110, 213 (2000)

15

Resonant Inelastic XX-ray Spectroscopy


2p XAS of CaF2

Resonant Inelastic XX-ray Scattering


2p3s RIXS of CaF2

3d0

3d0

2p53d1

2p53d1

3s13d1

3s13d1

Resonant Inelastic XX-ray Spectroscopy

Phys. Rev. B.
53, 7099 (1996)

Soft xx-ray RIXS and magnetism


NiII 3d8 [] 2p53d9[jj] 3d8[]

Butorin
J. Elec. Spec 110, 213 (2000)

Soft xx-ray RIXS and magnetism


S
spin-flip

dd

Soft xx-ray RIXS and magnetism

MS
spin-flip

3p3d RIXS
of Sr2CuO2Cl2
x2-y2
xz

2p3d RIXS of NiO

Phys. Rev. B.
57, 14584 (1998)
New exp: EPFL

xy

z2

0 3p 0 + dd + spin-flip

Phys. Rev. Lett.


Lett.
80, 5204 (1998)

16

Effect of energy resolution (on CoO)


Pre-edgeCoO
and edge

high-spin CoII
3d7 [4T2]

Only quadrupole peaks visible


3d7 1s13d8 2p53d8
Only correct with interference effects ON

Pre-edge and edge

Non-local
peaks
RIXS-MCD screening
at the K pre-edge

CoII(acac)

LiCoO2

AgCoO2

LaCoO3
at 20K
Vanko et al.
(submitted)

Non-local
peaks
RIXS-MCD screening
at the K pre-edge

Non-local
peaks
RIXS-MCD screening
at the K pre-edge

17

Non-local
screening
peaks
RIXS-MCD
at the
K pre-edge
of Fe3O4

Non-local
peaks
RIXS-MCD screening
at the K pre-edge

Non-local
peaks
RIXS-MCD screening
at the K pre-edge

La 2p XAS: effects of HERFD


2p5d dipole
2p4f quadrupole

XMCD at high-pressure
Glatzel et al. PRB 72, 014117 (2005)

La 2p XAS: effects of HERFD

HERFD makes prepre-edge 2p4f transition visible

La 2p XAS: effects of HERFD


LaF3

2p5d dipole
2p4f quadrupole

Suljoti et al. (new data from ID26)

18

Does FY does measure X-ray Absorption?

La 2p XAS: effects of HERFD

2p5d dipole

LaF3

2p4f quadrupole

HERFD makes prepre-edge 2p4f transition visible


Why has the 2p4f prepre-edge 3 peaks?

?
?

Suljoti et al. (new data from ID26)

Does HERFD measure X-ray Absorption?

2p4d RIXS of LaF3

2p4f quadrupole
4f0 2p5 4f1

4f0 + 4f1L 2p5 4f1 + 2p5 4f2L


4f05d0 + 4f0 5d1L 2p5 4f1 + 2p54f15d1L

Suljoti et al. (new data from ID26)

HERFD-XANES of LaF3

2p4d RIXS of LaF3


measured with 2p4d XES
4f0 2p5 4f1 4d9 4f1

one peak
multiplet structure

Suljoti et al. (new data from ID26)

19

CTM4XAS
CTM4XAS simulations

Applications

2p XAS of Mn2+ and Fe3+


High-spin: 10Dq = 1.2
MnO
Low-spin: 10Dq = 3.0
FeIII(tacn)

Systems with pi-bonds


X-MCD of Fe-complexes on metal surfaces
In-situ STXM chemical imaging

CTM4XAS simulations

XAS
orbitalCovalence
covalence
XASand
anddifferential
Differential Orbital
Derive DOC from CTM4XAS simulation
Comparison to DOC from DFT (ADF) calculation
FeIII(tacn)2
Eg (63%)
T2g ( 99%)

J. Phys. Chem. B. 109, 20751 (2005)

LMCT and MLCT: - bonding

XAS and Differential Orbital Covalence


Derive DOC from CTM4XAS simulation
Comparison to DOC from DFT (ADF) calculation

FeIII: Ground state: 3d5 + 3d6L

3d6L

with Ed Solomon (Stanford) JACS 125, 12894 (2003),


JACS 128, 10442 (2006), JACS 129, 113 (2007)







 

3d5

2p53d7L
+U-Q

2p53d6
with Ed Solomon (Stanford) JACS 125, 12894 (2003),
JACS 128, 10442 (2006), JACS 129, 113 (2007)

20

LMCT and MLCT: - bonding

3d6L

2p53d5L
3d4L

-U+Q + 2

3d6L

2p53d7L
+U-Q - 2

2p53d6

3d5

with Ed Solomon (Stanford) JACS 125, 12894 (2003),


JACS 128, 10442 (2006), JACS 129, 113 (2007)

Fe(TPA)
4 on Cu(100)
Supramolecular

Pietro
previous withnext

Pietro
previous withnext

control of Fe arrays

Gambardella (Barcelona), Nature Materials 8, 189 (2009)

Fe(TPA)
4 on Cu(100)
Supramolecular

LMCT and MLCT: - bonding

3d4L

control of Fe arrays

Gambardella (Barcelona), Nature Materials 8, 189 (2009)

FeIII(tacn)2

10

Normalized Absorption

FeIII: Ground state:

3d5

Fit X
Series2

FeIII(CN)6

6
4
2
0
700
-2

705

710

715

720

725

730

with Ed Solomon (Stanford) JACS 125, 12894 (2003),


Energy (eV)
JACS 128, 10442 (2006), JACS 129, 113 (2007)

Fe(TPA)
4 on Cu(100)
Supramolecular

Pietro
previous withnext

Gambardella (Barcelona), Nature Materials 8, 189 (2009)

Fe(TPA)
4 on Cu(100)
Supramolecular

Pietro
previous withnext

control of Fe arrays

control of Fe arrays

Gambardella (Barcelona), Nature Materials 8, 189 (2009)

21

Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

Why X-ray absorption?

Identical spectral shape

Element specific
Low concentrations (0.01-0.1 wt%)

XAS at Synchrotron
EELS with Electron
Microscope

Valence, Spin-state,
Crystal field energies, dd-excitations
Hybridization (differential orbital covalence)
MO energies / Density of states

XAS: 0.2 eV/20nm


EELS: 0.2 eV/0.5 nm

UHV

XAS: extreme
conditions

Space?, Time?, Pressure?

EELS: vacuum

Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

TEMTEM-EELS of FeZSMFeZSM-5
1.0

fe4

Y Axis Title

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0
700

705

710

715

720

725

X Axis Title

730

180000

Y Axis Title

160000

140000

120000

100000

80000

60000
530

535

540

545

550

555

560

565

570

X Axis Title

 



 



Quantify EELS spectra of Ti, Mn and Co

10nm

J. Catal.
230, 301 (2005)

22

 



 



Before reduction
(Co,Mn)3O4 particles

After reduction
Co metal +
MnO particles
PCCP 7, 568 (2005)
J. Catal. 230, 301 (2005)

SPACE: Electron Energy Loss in a TEM


Co(Mn)Ox

MnMn-doped Co on TiO2

TiO2

+H2

10 nm

SPACE: STEM-EELS versus STXM-XAS


STEMSTEM-EELS

STXMSTXM-XAS

UHV, 0.5 nm

1 bar, 500C, 30 nm

Co L edge at
each pixel
(0.5nm2)

780

785

790

795

Energy (eV)

Fernando Morales et al., PCCP 7, 568 (2005); J. Catal. 230, 310 (2005)

Metal L edges in 1989 and 2009


1989

UHV
RT
bulk

Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis

2009

2 bar flowing gas


up to 750K
20 nm resolution

-The Fischer-Tropsch GTL process produces an


extremely clean synthetic fraction of gasoil
- GTL fuel is virtually free of sulphur and aromatics.

23

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

On reactor cell: Fredrik Creemer et al. Ultramicroscopy 108, 993 (2008)

Emiel de Smit et al. Nature 456, 222 (2008); Angew. Chem. 48, 3632 (2009)

STXM of Fe nanoparticles on TiO2

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

On reactor cell: Fredrik Creemer et al. Ultramicroscopy 108, 993 (2008)

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

Fe3O4

Fe3O4

1 bar H2
150 C

1 bar H2
250 C

Emiel de Smit et al. Nature 456, 222 (2008); Angew. Chem. 48, 3632 (2009)

Emiel de Smit et al. Nature 456, 222 (2008); Angew. Chem. 48, 3632 (2009)

24

SiO2

Oxygen K-edge
530

540

550

X-Ray Photon Energy (eV)

Normalized Absorption

Normalized Absorption

Nanoscale chemical imaging of Fe2O3 [K, Cu]/SiO2

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

Iron L-edge
Fe2O3

; :
705

710

715

720

725

X-Ray Photon Energy (eV)

; #

; :

-

;

:#-

; :

5 #7

 :

 #

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

K+Cu doped Fe2O3 on SiO2

K+Cu doped Fe3O4 on SiO2

Emiel de Smit et al. Nature 456, 222 (2008); Angew. Chem. 48, 3632 (2009)

Emiel de Smit et al. Nature 456, 222 (2008); Angew. Chem. 48, 3632 (2009)

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

Before and after reduction

Before and after FTS


Emiel de Smit et al. Nature 456, 222 (2008); Angew. Chem. 48, 3632 (2009)

Emiel de Smit et al. Nature 456, 222 (2008); Angew. Chem. 48, 3632 (2009)

25

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a working catalyst

Why X-ray Absorption?


Element specific
Low concentrations (0.01-0.1 wt%)

Valence, Spin-state, Crystal field energies


Hybridization, MO energies / Density of states

Time: excited states (mainly) in ps range


Pressure: 1 bar/500 C flowing gas
Space: 0.5 nm (STEM), 20 nm (STXM)
Emiel de Smit et al. Nature 456, 222 (2008); Angew. Chem. 48, 3632 (2009)

www.anorg.chem.uu.nl/people/staff/FrankdeGroot/

26

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi