Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
he gre
physic
of physics. Yet, almost 150 years since its inception,
and e
properties
its foundations and basic postulates are still the subject
Here w
he great
conceptual
puzzle
statistical
mechanics isof how
a
Statistical mechanics is one of the most successful areas of debate.
statistica
Here
we suggest
thatof the
main postulate
physical system, despite always being in some definite
state,
about
twen
that
results
from
considering
each
state
of
the
universe
to
be
equally
of physics. Yet, almost 150 years since its inception, of statistical
mechanics,
the equal acan
priori
probability
subjective
and evolving
deterministically,
exhibit
thermodynamical
probable.
To make
sensetoofstatistical
this image,
assumptions
ergodicity
are 1not
. re
properties
pertinent
averages,
such as of
the
entropy
postulate,
should
be
abandoned
as
misleading
and
its foundations and basic postulates are still the subject are needed to ensure that the universe explores all the available
is, the sys
Here we consider an alternative approach to the foundations
is in a q
space
equally, and
ofargue
coursethat
thisitdoes
not solve
the problem
what
unnecessary.
We
should
be replaced
by
aofAharonov
of
statistical
mechanics,
suggested
to
one
of
us
by
Yakir
E
of debate. Here we suggest that the main postulate the state of the subsystem is at a given time.
thermaliza
about canonical
twenty years
ago. Inwhose
this approach
the usualis devices
of
the environ
general
principle,
physical
content
What
we
showed
here
is
that
these
averages
are
not
necessary.
2
of
statistical mechanics, the equal a priori probability subjective randomness, ensemble-averaging or time-averaging
,
the univer
Published online: 29 October 2006; doi:10.1038/nphys444
Rather,
(almost)different
any individual
state
of the universe
is such
that
fundamentally
from
the
postulate
it
replaces:
it
similar
line
are not required. We show that, although the universe
(that
any
suciently
small
subsystem
behaves
as
if
the
universe
was
in
postulate, should be abandoned as misleading and is, the system together with a suciently large environment)
and Gemm
refers
to
individual
states,
rather
than
to
ensemble
or
he great conceptual
puzzle
of statistical mechanics
how aThis is due to massive entanglement
the
equiprobable
average isstate.
Statistical mechanics is one of the most successful areas
We for
is
in
a
quantum
pure
state
subject
to
a
global
constraint,
physical
system,
despite
always
being
in
some
definite
state,
S argue that it should be replaced by a between the subsystem and
unnecessary.
We
the
rest of
universe,
which states
is a that
time
averages.
Furthermore,
whereas
thethe
original
postulate
of physics. Yet, almost 150 years since its inception,
and evolving deterministically,
can exhibit
thermodynamical
thermalization
results
from
entanglement
between
the
system
state)and
for
1
genericaverages,
featuresuch
ofasthe
vast majority
of states. To obtain this result,
.
properties pertinent to statistical
the entropy
its
foundations
and
basic
postulates
are
still
the
subject
the
This
leads to
athe
finite
entropy
ofpropose
the
system,
despiteq
general canonical principle, whose physicalHere
content
is
an environment.
unprovable
assumption,
principle
we
rigorous
we considerisan
alternative
approach to the
foundations
we
have
introduced
measures
ofthe
eective
size
of the
system,
to one of usitself
by Yakirhaving
Aharonovzero entropy. Significant results
the
universe
alongth
e ordinary
of debate. Here we suggest that the main postulate of statistical mechanics,dsuggested
,
and
its
environment
(that
is,
the
rest
of
the
universe),
d
,
and
SIn
is
mathematically
proven.
The
key
element
in
this
proof
E
3
4
about
twenty
years
ago.
this
approach
the
usual
devices
of
fundamentally different from the postulate it replaces: it similar lines have been obtained
constraints
,
Lloyd
by
Bocchieri
and
Loinger
2
of statistical mechanics, the equal a priori probability subjective randomness,showed
that
the
average
distance
between
the
individual
reduced
,
ensemble-averaging or time-averaging
5
determine
B
Gemmer
et
al.
;
see
also
very
recent
work
by dGoldstein
et al6 .
isand
the
quantum
entanglement
between
the
system
and
e
are not required. We states
show
that,
although
the
universe
(that
/d
.
Levys
and
the
canonical
state
is
directly
related
to
S
refers
individual
states,as rather
than
or
state for th
E
postulate,toshould
be abandoned
misleading
and tois,ensemble
the system together with a We
suciently
large environment)
formulate
and
prove
a
general
canonical
principle
, which
lemma
is then
invoked
to concludeseparates
that all but
an
exponentially
constraints
its
environment.
Our
approach
the
issue
of
is
in
a
quantum
pure
state
subject
to
a
global
constraint,
unnecessary. We argue that it should be replaced by a
states
that between
the
system
will
be thermalized
(that state.
is, in the canonical
time
averages. Furthermore, whereas the original
postulate
thermalization
results from
entanglement
the system
generalized
small
fraction
of all
states
areand
close
to the canonical
Figure
3
Example:
A
system
of
spins.
As
a
concrete
application
of
our
theorem,
finding
the
canonical
state
from
finding
out
how
close
a
toThe
a finite
entropy
of the system,
despite
for
almost
all
pure
states
of the
universe,
provide
general canonical principle, whose physical content is the environment. This leads state)
Our res
main
message
of our
paper
is that
averages
are notand
needed
the
universe
itself
having
zero
entropy.
Significant
results
along
consider
of n spin-1/2 systems
in an external magnetic
field B, where
a
is
ana set
unprovable
assumption,
principle
we propose
consider
an
rigorous
In fact,
we the
actually
beyond
3 bounds.
fundamentally
different from
the postulate the
it replaces:
it similar
tosystem
justify
thetoquantitative
canonical
state
ofto4 ago
system
inbeyond
contact
with
thego
rest
of
is
it,
allowing
even
usual
, us
Lloyd
lines have been obtained
by Bocchieri
and
Loinger
particular subset of k spins form the system S, and the remaining nand
kGemmer
spins form
almost
all
thermalization:
statistical
setting,
energy
et al.5 ; seethe
alsoordinary
very recent work
by Goldstein
et
al6in
. the standard
universealmost
any
individual
state
of
the
universe
is
enough
refers
to
individual
states,
rather
than
to
ensemble
or
mathematically
proven.
The
element
proof
in which
theisenvironment
E. We consider
a restriction
to thekey
energy
eigenspacein
HRthis
We
formulate
and prove
a general canonical
principle
, whichon the state of the universe,thermalize
boltzmannian
situation.
constraints
are
imposed
which
to
lead
to
the
canonical
state. In eect, we propose to replace
any initial
that the system will be thermalized (that is, in the canonical
thewith
original
postulate
nptime
spinsaverages.
are in theFurthermore,
excited state whereas
|1 (aligned
the field)
and thestates
remaining
a corresponding
thermal
canonical
priori temperature
probabilities and
by the
principle
of the s
thedetermine
postulate
equalanda provide
state)
for almostand
all pure
states
of the of
universe,
is p)
the
quantum
entanglement
between
the
system
about
n(1
spins
are
in
the
ground
state
|0
(opposite
to
the
field).
With
this
setup,
is an unprovable assumption, the principle we propose rigorous quantitative bounds.
fact,
we actually
go In
beyond
stateIn for
the
system.
contrast, we
allow
completely
arbitrary
a priori
probabilities,
which
states
that as far
apparently
equal
weas
might e
ordinary
thermalization:
in
the
standard
statistical
setting,
energy
= 2kenvironment.
and d R 2nH(p) , where
H(p)
=
p
log
(p)
(1
p)log
(1
p)
is
the
d Sits
2
2
Our approach separates the issue of constraints, which leads to the system being in a corresponding
increase. It
2
ARTICLES
theonsystem
constraints are imposed
the stateis ofconcerned
the universe,almost
which
LETTERS
Marcos Rigol1,2, Vanja Dunjko1,2 & Maxim Olshanii2 Vol 452 | 17 April 2008 | doi:10.1038/nature06838
LETTERS
isolated quantum systems
1,2
37
8,9
14
14
1,2
37
10
thermal
thermal
thermal
8,9
11
4,5
coherence
time
time
Thermal state
14
dephasing
chaos
11
12
4,5
13
thermal
thermal
thermal
15
16
coherence
10
EIGENSTATE THERMALIZATION
12
13
15
16
10
1,2,17
18,19
8,9
Initial state