Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

Quality Management QMTG14-4

Session 08 Inspection (Continued) + VSM


(Continued)

Costs Related to Inspection

Number of items in lot = N


Number of items in sample = n
Proportion of defective in lot = p
Damage cost incurred if defective reaches customer = A
Inspection cost per item = I
Probability that producer will accept the lot using
sampling plan = Pa
If rejected All remaining samples are inspected
Find cost of
100% Inspection/ No Inspection/ Sampling
Compare costs Deming kp rule
Dipankar Bose - XLRI

VSM (Continued)

Dipankar Bose - XLRI

Future State Pacemaker

Pacemaker
Try to send the Customer Schedule to only one
Production Process
No supermarket downstream to pacemaker

Why would we want the customer schedule to


Only go to only one point in the production process

How can we flow information so that


One process will make only
What the next process needs
When it needs it
Dipankar Bose - XLRI

Traditional Scheduling vs. Level


Scheduling
Traditional Scheduling

Level Scheduling

Daily Production

Daily Production

Mon 4000 Part D


Tue 4000 Part D

Part D

Thu 4000 Part C


Fri

Part B 600
Part D
Part A
Part B
Part C

Wed 4000 Part D


Part D

Part A 200

Part A
Part B
Part C

Part C 800
Part D
Part A
Part B
Part C

3000 B 1000 A

Part D 2400
Part D
Part A
Part B
Part C

Part D

Part D
Part A
Part B
Part C

Part C

Part D

Part B & A

Mon.

Tue.

Wed.

Thu.

Fri.

Mon.

Tue.

Wed.

Thu

Fri.

Dipankar Bose - XLRI

Pacemaker and Leveling

Leveling
Small Lot Production
Distribute the Production mix of products evenly over
time at the Pacemaker Process
Release and take away only small, consistent increments of
work at the Pacemaker Process
Load Leveling Box Heijunka
How Pace Withdrawal works?
Develop the ability to Make Every Part Every time in the
processes upstream of the pacemaker process
Time Day > Shift > Pitch > Takt
SMED
Dipankar Bose - XLRI

VSM Disadvantages

Fails to handle multiple products that


Do not have identical maps
Fails to relate
Transportation and Queuing delays/ Changes in
transfer batch sizes due to poor plant layout
Lacks any worthwhile economic measure for value
Which makes it similar to the Flow Process Charting
technique used by IEs
Tends to bias a factory designer to consider only
Continuous flow/ Assembly line layouts/ Kanbanbased Pull scheduling
Suitable mainly for HIGH volume and LOW variety
Dipankar Bose - XLRI

VSM Disadvantages Continued

Fails to consider the allocations and utilization of an


important resource
Factory floorspace for WIP storage/ Production
support/ Material handling aisles
Fails to show the impact on WIP, order throughput and
operating expenses of in-efficient material flows in the
facility
Fails to handle complex BOMs that translate into
Branched and multi-level Operation Process Charts and
Flow Diagrams for the products
Fails to factor queuing delays, multi-order sequencing
rules, capacity constraints, etc. into a map
Dipankar Bose - XLRI

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi