With faith and loyalty political and or religion the great grand canyon divide and so conquered

Grape Vine 13
RESCINDED
Roman Egyptian Spirit Ceded Induced Neurosis Debased Eradicated Deception
Neurosis
is a class of functional mental disorders involving distress but neither delusions nor hallucinations, whereby
behavior is not outside socially acceptable norms.
Imperialism
1. Belief in Empire Building
The policy of extending the rule or influence of a country over other countries or colonies
2. Domination by Empire
The political, military, or economic domination of one country over another
3. Takeover and Domination
The extension of power or authority over others in the interests of domination
Jesuit
1. Member of Roman Catholic religious order
A member of the Society of Jesus, a Roman Catholic religious order engaged in missionary and educational
work worldwide. The order was founded by Saint Ignatius Loyola in 1534 with the objective of defending
Catholicism against the Reformation.
2. Offensive Term
An offensive term for somebody regarded as crafty or scheming, especially somebody who uses deliberately
ambiguous or confusing words to deceive others
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law
The rule of law is a legal maxim that provides that no person is above the law, that no one can be punished by
the state except for a breach of the law, and that no one can be convicted of breaching the law except in the
manner set forth by the law itself. The rule of law stands in contrast to the idea that the leader is above the
law, a feature of Roman law, Nazi law, and certain other legal systems.
The phrase has been used since the 17th century, but the concept is older. For example, the Greek
philosopher Aristotle said, "Law should govern".[2]
One way to be free from the rule of law is by denying that an enactment has the necessary attributes of law.
The rule of law has therefore been described as [3] giving rise to a
"rampant divergence of understandings".[4]
At least two principal conceptions of the rule of law can be identified: a formalist or "thin" and a substantive
or "thick" definition of the rule of law. Formalist definitions of the rule of law do not make a judgment about
the "justness" of law itself, but define specific procedural attributes that a legal framework must have in order
to be in compliance with the rule of law. Substantive conceptions of the rule of law go beyond this and include
certain substantive rights that are said to be based on, or derived from, the rule of law. [5]

Ambiguous To Osmosis Mind Subversive

But for the essence of God go I
Adjustments
Due the essence of God need not go Intuitive Electromagnetism Solar Energy Gratis Discoverer Inventors of
Nothing.
Rewards for discovery greater than an Easter Egg perhaps a goose golden egg
Toga out in with the
TOGEE
Teachers of God Energy Essential
To horde for self is likened to not inform the bridge ahead is out
Discovery of anothers land does not make it theirs any more than a wallet in ones pocket!!!
As absurd as first earth arrival declaring for self
NAUSEA
Negotiate Aid Usury Sacrilege Essence Asserts
RICE FEED ZOOLOGY NATALITY
Roman Imperialist Capitalist Enslavers Famished Economics Egoist Democracy
Zionist Occupation Oppression Luciferian Opulent Gobbling Yo-yos Noodles Attempting Think Aping Logic In
Tangled Yarn
Akin Nazi Asshole Luciferian
Illegal Since Inherent Start
NWO
No War Ordinance
Since about 2000 BC Abraham NEWS Never Ending War Story
Universal Declaration Of Human Rights
1948 AD
Christian Era CE Cause Effect
UDOHR
Many of the basic ideas that animated the movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War
and the atrocities of The Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948.
The ancient world did not possess the concept of universal human rights.[5]
PA - Praise Abraham

Confucius 551BC -479 BC knew well of IT!!

Whats up with that eh?
Perhaps the UDOHR appropriating tooter a need for appropriate Tudor hooter
RA
Reality Attests
He who worship sun
Cold Blooded
ADDER
Alienating Denial Deceptive Elusive Reptile
Louse in need of a ladder to mount a mouse for a
PR
Paternity Rat

Pack rat HAT Honor Among Thieves trade a string of beads for a golden reed that blows a tune of
MR
masticated ruin
SIR
Sincere Insipid Rhetoric
DR
Deranged Righteous
PS P
Political Science Psycho
FDA-Food Drug Annihilates
SOLIDSIFICATION
Spirit of Law Inalienable Divine Simplicity Intent Fiduciary Implied Contract Asp Tined in Op Neglect

Do not do to others what you would not want for self

Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness

Thats
IT
Invincible Triad
Supremacy of God Humanity (Spirit Force Law) Rule Of Law Legal Certainty
Irreproachable Judiciary Independence
Giving credence to that which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind needing only to be sane and human to
know what is and what is not receptive to a fellow human

So what is a Universal Declaration of Human Rights enforced by the IH Invisible Hand?

An asshole with cobwebs indicative of humanity starvation and that which double crossed to the infinitive
Waltz of the hooded cobra maestro
Recognizers Obvious Terrorists
Justice absent core facts a most onerous and formidable victim challenge lucrative rules lawyering
Victim, Accused and Public Interest as whole tax Paying Victims
Of thin air money Thin air Justice and Thin Air Armed Forces
That blows all up in smoke For the thin air bogey man as
PRIG Political Religious Intuitive Gullible cant get a GRIP yet with firm grip on status quo attempt to vent for
self betterment with Pros and Cons making Musical chairs Mc Headway with firm Grip on
Satanic Sucker School
SSS
Satanic Sucker Sandwich
illegal due process
Pope save the Pope Pope save the Queen
Blessed be the armed mercenaries enslaved financing
NEWS
Never Ending War Story
Shadow Government
SG
Sustainable Growth
God Essence de jure proclaimed administer antithesis de facto doG
BOW
Black on White
Tax payer Monkey in Middle

Private sector lawyer sue hell out of for the BOW they are ignorantly innocent thereof bless the pope

Thin Air Thinning Effect

Truth
Get out of Here Terrorist
Crazy or Whatever
COITUS
Conflict of Interest Trust Usury Systemic
It is only the wisest and the stupidest that cannot change
We all pay the price!!
Aint seen nothing yet!!!
For the Lord works in mysterious ways
Satanic knows the Lord helps them that help investigate and forgive self eh!!
Political Religious Implicit Complicit Explicit
PRICE
Pope Roman Imperialist Capitalist Emperors
Like other financial empires in history, Smith claims the contemporary model forms alliances necessary to develop and
control wealth,
as peripheral nations remain impoverished providers of cheap resources for the imperial-centers-of-capital.[1]
Belloc estimated that, during the British Enclosures, "perhaps half of the whole population was proletarian",
while roughly the other "half" owned and controlled the means of production. Now, under modern Capitalism, J.W.
Smith claims
fewer than 500 people possess more wealth than half of the earths population,
as the wealth of 1/2 of 1-percent of the United States population roughly equal that of the lower 90-percent.

Invisible Hands

IHHI Holistic Inversion

Acquiesced Inevitable Neurotic Tail Spin

Energy Gratis Opulence Segregation
Spirit Coherence Integrity Energy Natural Cause Effect
I B4 E

except after See

?

Airwaves Wrong Fiduciary Unaccountable Logical Subterfuge

Butterflies Spin

Subordinate Acquiesced Inevitable Neurotic Tail Spin

SOUND
Spin Over Underhanded Negotiated Divvy-up

Energy

rossed

Holy Opulence

yed ystemic

Heights of Ignorance
Hat Trick Avoidance Third Eye
Half Assed Trysts
HAT
Honor among Thieves

Crook Hook Ubiquitous Righteous Complicit Holistic Essence Double-cross

Yo-Yos
Spin
Yang

Yin
Parental Guidance
PG
Penal Gland

?
Personal Computer

PC
Penal Code
CIA
Church Impunity Acquiesced

PC - Personal Computer

Premeditated Fallacy Church Programmed CP

On the Right hand dont know what Left Hand Is doing

And on the other hand ..
PR RP
Political Religious Reverse Psycho
PR
Political Religious Illusion Charlatan Kleptocracy media inciting Fickle Inherent Bias Ignorant Bliss
Forte
Fixed Opulent Righteous Tax Evasion
Satanic Sucker School
SSS
Satanic Sucker Sandwich
CT - Critical Think Political Religious Optimist -PRO
Apple of Ground
Pomme de Terres
Providence of money mass essential dominant erection Terrestrial elevation reversed reflex essence subterfuge

A flea backstroking with reserved erection calls forth for the draw bridge to raised
TECE PNTR RCR
Trial Error Cause Effect Progressive Nature Thought Reason Retrospect Constant Recalibration
Pennies from heavens reign
Apples opulent Grounds
$$$
COUNT
Critical Opulence Unaccountable Net Think
GROAN
All Pain no Pleasure
Ground to a Pulp
Mashed Easy Swallow Ignorance Ass Holistic

MESSIAH
Out of body experience

One thumb in upper orifice other lower reluctant to switch

ASP
Attention Span Phenomenon
Snake this snake that

A flea backstroking with reserved erection calls forth for the draw bridge to raised

Arguments of Mc 2, 3 Pig Divvy-up

Forgetting Reluctance Essence Switch Hole

Once Triggered
Floods Omnipresent Constipated Ubiquitous Shit
Out of body experience

One thumb in upper orifice other lower reluctant to switch

ASP
Attention Span Phenomenon
Snake this snake that
A flea backstroking with reserved erection calls forth for the draw bridge to raised

Varoom

Monarchy resolution
Mr
Mushroom reflects

Thats all Folks

IQ QI
Intelligence Quotient Question Is

Who Knew
?

VIVACIOUS
Voluntary Involuntary Vegetation Acquiesced Conscious Illusion Osmosis Ubiquitous Sync
Immaculate God given user friendly brain reduced to that of a
Plate

of
FATE
Fact all Truths Erasure
Predetermined Lost Civilization due process
RA
RA
RA
Rise Again Rise Again Rise Again
For they all are
HIGH
Holistic Intelligent Gratis Hindsight

RIP

ACCORD

Reality in Perpetuity
A
Afterlife

G OI
ravity

f t

No
Umbrella
Rip Cord
Admonished Conscious
AC
Abolished Conscience

Left or Right Exchange of Yin-yang Opulent Righteous Exponential

NEWS
Never Ending War Story

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution
A constitution
is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is
governed.[1] These rules together make up, i.e. constitute, what the entity is. When these principles are written
down into a single collection or set of legal documents, those documents may be said to comprise a written
constitution.
Constitutions concern different levels of organizations, from sovereign states to companies and unincorporated
associations. A treaty which establishes an international organization is also its constitution in that it would
define how that organization is constituted. Within states, whether sovereign or federated, a constitution defines
the principles upon which the state is based, the procedure in which laws are made and by whom. Some
constitutions, especially written constitutions, also act as limiters of state power by establishing lines which a
state's rulers cannot cross such as

fundamental rights.
Generally, every modern written constitution confers specific powers to an organization or institutional entity, established
upon the primary condition that it

abides by the said constitution's limitations.

According to Scott Gordon, a political organization is constitutional to the extent that it "contain[s] institutionalized
mechanisms of power control for

the protection of the interests and liberties of the citizenry,

including those that may be in the minority."[7]
Human rights
are commonly understood as "inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply
because she or he is a human being."[1] Human rights are thus conceived as universal (applicable everywhere)
and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist as natural rights or as legal rights, in both
national and international law.[2] The doctrine of human rights in international practice, within international
law, global and regional institutions, in the policies of states and in the activities of non-governmental
organizations, has been a cornerstone of public policy around the world. The idea of human rights [3] states, "if
the public discourse of peacetime global society can be said to have a common moral language, it is that of
human rights."
Despite this, the strong claims made by the doctrine of human rights continue to provoke considerable
skepticism and debates about the content, nature and justifications of human rights to this day.

Indeed,
the question of what is meant by a "right" is itself controversial and the subject of continued philosophical
debate.[4]
Many of the basic ideas that animated the movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War and
the atrocities of The Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in
Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The ancient world did not possess the concept of
universal human rights.[5]Ancient societies had "elaborate systems of duties... conceptions of justice, political
legitimacy, and human flourishing that sought to realize human dignity, flourishing, or well-being entirely
independent of human rights".[6] The modern concept of human rights developed during the early Modern
period, alongside the European secularization of Judeo-Christian ethics.[7] The true forerunner of human rights
discourse was the concept of natural rights which appeared as part of the medieval Natural law tradition that
became prominent during the Enlightenment with such philosophers as John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, and

Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui, and featured prominently in the political discourse of the American Revolution and
the French Revolution.
From this foundation, the modern human rights arguments emerged over the latter half of the twentieth century.
Gelling as social activism and political rhetoric in many nations put it high on the world agenda.[8]
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience
and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)[9]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Act,_1982
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights.
The Charter is intended to
protect certain political and civil rights of people in Canada

****from****
the policies and actions of all levels of government.
It is also supposed to unify Canadians around a set of principles that embody those rights.[3][4]
The Charter was preceded by the Canadian Bill of Rights, which was introduced by the government of John
Diefenbaker in 1960.
However, the Bill of Rights was only a federal statute, rather than a constitutional document.
Therefore, it was limited in scope and was easily amendable. This motivated some within government to
improve rights protections in Canada.
The movement for human rights and freedoms that emerged after World War II also wanted to entrench the
principles enunciated in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[5]
Hence, the government of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau enacted the Charter in 1982.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

The pursuit of human rights was a central reason for creating the UN. World War II atrocities and genocide led
to a ready consensus that the new organization must work to prevent any similar tragedies in the future. An
early objective was creating a legal framework for considering and acting on complaints about human rights
violations. The UN Charter obliges all member nations to promote "universal respect for, and observance of,
human rights" and to take "joint and separate action" to that end. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

though not legally binding,

was adopted by the General Assembly in 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all. The Assembly
regularly takes up human rights issues.
A large share of UN expenditures addresses the core UN mission of peace and security. The peacekeeping
budget for the 20052006 fiscal year was approximately US$5 billion, 2.5 billion (compared to approximately
US$1.5 billion, 995 million for the UN core budget over the same period), with some 70,000 troops deployed
in 17 missions around the world.[60] UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived
from the regular funding scale, but including a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council
members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted
peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. As of 1 January 2011, the top 10 providers of
assessed financial contributions to United Nations peacekeeping operations were: the United States, Japan, the
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, China, Canada, Spain and the Republic of Korea.[61]
Special UN programmes not included in the regular budget (such as UNICEF, the WFP and UNDP) are
financed by voluntary contributions from other member governments. Most of this is financial contributions,
but some is in the form of agricultural commodities donated for afflicted populations. Since their funding is

voluntary, many of these agencies suffer severe shortages during economic recessions.
In July 2009, the World Food Programme reported that it has been forced to cut services because of insufficient
funding.[62]
It has received barely a quarter of the total it needed for the 09/10 financial year.
Many of the basic ideas that animated the movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War and
the atrocities of the Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of the

Universal Declaration of Human

Rights
in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948.
The ancient world did not possess the concept of universal human rights.[5] Ancient societies had "elaborate
systems of duties... conceptions of justice, political legitimacy, and human flourishing that sought to realize
human dignity, flourishing, or well-being entirely independent of human rights".[6] The modern concept of
human rights developed during the early Modern period, alongside the European secularization of JudeoChristian ethics.[7] The true forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept of natural rights which
appeared as part of the medieval Natural law tradition, became prominent during the Enlightenment with such
philosophers as John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, and Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui, and featured prominently in the
political discourse of the American Revolution and the French Revolution.
Multinational companies play an increasingly large role in the world, and have been responsible for numerous
human rights abuses.[52] Although the legal and moral environment surrounding the actions of governments is
reasonably well developed, that surrounding multinational companies is both controversial and illdefined.[citation needed] Multinational companies' primary responsibility is to their shareholders, not to those
affected by their actions. Such companies may be larger than the economies of some of the states within which
they operate, and can wield significant economic and political power. No international treaties exist to
specifically cover the behavior of companies with regard to human rights, and national legislation is very
variable. Jean Ziegler, Special Rapporteur of the UN Commission on Human Rights on the right to food stated
in a report in 2003:
In August 2003 the Human Rights Commission's Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human
Rights produced draft Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises
with regard to human rights.[54] These were considered by the Human Rights Commission in 2004,
[55]

but have no binding status on corporations and are not monitored.

www.Pre13.com