Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Food Chemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem
b
c
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 6502 South Archer Road, Bedford Park, IL 60501, United States
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States
Institute for Food Safety and Health, Illinois Institute of Technology, 6502 South Archer Road, Bedford Park, IL 60501, United States
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 7 August 2013
Received in revised form 6 February 2014
Accepted 12 February 2014
Available online 22 February 2014
1. Introduction
AC
The effects of phenolic constituents in red cranberry extracts (RCE) and white cranberry extracts (WCE)
on the endothelial cell function were investigated. Peonidin-3-O-galactoside, cyanidin-3-O-arabinoside,
and cyanidin-3-O-galactoside were the predominant anthocyanins characterized, whereas a procyanidin
tetramer was the predominant proanthocyanidin identied. The antioxidant properties of RCE and WCE
were not signicantly different regardless of antioxidant assays (DPPH, FRAP, and TEAC) used. Both RCE
and WCE induced the phosphorylation of Akt in vitro in human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC),
resulting in the phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, cell migration, and tube formation.
The enhanced phosphorylation of PI3/Akt kinase in HUVEC, endothelial cell wound healing, and tube
formation elicited by RCE and WCE suggest that overall phenolic constituents rather than individual
phenolic compounds within the cranberry matrix may be responsible for these biological effects.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
ET
Keywords:
Cranberry
Phenolic compounds
Antioxidants
Anthocyanins
Proanthocyanidins
Flavonols
Phenolic acids
Endothelial cell function
p-Akt
Cell migration
Tube formation
TE
Artemio Z. Tulio Jr. a,, Joseph E. Jablonski a, Lauren S. Jackson a, Claire Chang a,b, Indika Edirisinghe c,
Britt Burton-Freeman c
541
R1
OH
OH
OH
OH
HO
R2
OH
OH
OH
quercetin
anthocyanidin
R1
R2
-----------------------------------------------------------cyanidin
OH
O-galactoside
O-glucoside
O-arabinoside
peonidin
OCH3
O-galactoside
O-glucoside
O-arabinoside
OH
OH
HO
OH
OH
OH
myricetin
OH
COOH
O
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
TE
OH
n
OH
O
OH O
OH
HO
HO
OH
OH
ET
condensed tannins
(n indicates number of subunits)
COOH
AC
OH
protocatechuic acid
OCH3
H3 CO
OH
sinapic acid
OH
OH
HO
O
*
*
OH
OH
catechin
Fig. 1. Structures of (A) anthocyanins, (B) avonols, (C) proanthocyanidins, (D) phenolic acids, and (E) avan-3-ols found in cranberries.
ET
AC
2.3. Reagents
TE
542
543
AC
TE
ET
544
The total phenolic, total monomeric anthocyanin, total avonoid, and total procyanidin contents of RCE and WCE were compared in this study using spectrophotometric assays (Table 1).
The total phenolic contents of RCE (341.9 2.1 mg GAE/100 g fresh
weight) and WCE (WCE had 339.4 4.5 mg GAE/100 g fresh
weight) were not signicantly different (p > 0.05). In contrast, the
amount of estimated total monomeric anthocyanins, total avonoids, and total procyanidins between RCE and WCE were signicantly different (p < 0.05). The total monomeric anthocyanin
content of RCE calculated based on the molar extinction coefcient
of Cy-3-gluc was 21-times greater than that of WCE. The estimated
total avonoid content of WCE in terms of catechin equivalents
was 1.2 times compared with RCE. In addition, the total procyanidin content of WCE estimated as procyanidin A2 equivalents, was
almost twice than that of RCE.
ET
AC
TE
3. Results
Table 1
Total phenolic, total anthocyanin, total avonoid, total procyanidin contents and total antioxidant capacity of red and white cranberry extracts as determined by
spectrophometric assays.
Sample
Total phenolic
content (mg
GAE)a,b
Total anthocyanin
content (mg
C3GE)a,c
Total procyanidin
content (mg
PA2E)a,d
Total avonoid
content (mg
CE)a,e
TEACh
DPPHi
341.6 2.1 a
339.4 4.5 a
88.3 3.98 a
3.9 0.87 b
115.5 2.51 a
184.1 13.34 b
47.5 0.66 a
58.3 2.62 b
12.96 0.13 a
13.89 0.15 a
13.04 0.61 a
13.78 0.35 a
6.28 0.13 b
6.13 0.13 b
Expressed per 100 g FW. Means standard errors (n = 3). Columns with different letters are signicantly different (p < 0.05).
GAE, gallic acid equivalents
C3GE, Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside equivalents.
PA2E, procyanidin A2 equivalents.
CE, catechin equivalents.
Expressed as lmol Trolox equivalents/g fresh weight.
Ferric reducing antioxidant power.
Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity.
2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.
545
1
5.0e-2
AU
2
5
(a)
2.5e-2
0.0
8.00
5.0e-2
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
AU
(b)
0.0
8.00
4
1
AU
5.0e-2
(c)
2.5e-2
8.00
10.00
12.00
TE
0.0
6
5
2.5e-2
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
Time
AC
Fig. 2a. Anthocyanin proles of (a) 10 ppm mixed anthocyanin standards, (b) white cranberry extract (WCE), and (c) red cranberry extract (RCE) detected by photodiode
array at 520 nm. Peak ID, 1 = cyanidin 3-galactoside, 2 = cyanidin 3-glucoside, 3 = cyanidin 3-arabinoside, 4 = peonidin 3-galactoside, 5 = peonidin 3-glucoside, and
6 = peonidin 3-arabinoside.
Table 2
Summary of the anthocyanins, avonols, phenolic acids, and proanthocyanidins quantied in red and white cranberry extracts as determined by LCMS/MS.a
Red cranberry extracts (mg/100 g FWb)
13.75 1.03
ndc
18.71 0.68
28.39 0.87
1.97 0.46
5.45 1.57
68.27
0.17 1.03
nd
0.35 0.68
0.23 0.87
nd
0.06 1.57
0.81
0.30 1.05
2.09 2.26
2.10 1.67
0.50 0.34
nd
nd
6.48 0.82
nd
2.27 0.68
12.82 4.32
nd
3.75 0.34
2.39 0.40
nd
0.28 0.10
1.69 6.59
2.81 1.62
0.62 1.61
nd
nd
2.02 1.03
nd
1.15 1.19
6.89 1.25
nd
2.33 0.83
1.52 1.84
nd
3.29 0.21
35.99
2.99 0.10
22.30
Proanthocyanidins
Procyanidin B1
Catechin
Procyanidin B2
Procyanidin C1
Procyanidin trimer type A
Procyanidin tetramer type A
Total proanthocyanidins
0.37 0.00
0.87 0.57
1.56 0.24
4.27 1.69
1.10 7.33
7.93 0.07
16.10
0.50 0.00
2.11 2.38
1.46 0.32
6.55 0.82
2.38 14.77
17.21 0.09
30.21
Peak
Compound
1
2
3
4
5
6
Anthocyanins
Cyanidin 3-galactoside
Cyanidin 3-glucoside
Cyanidin 3-arabinoside
Peonidin 3-galactoside
Peonidin 3-glucoside
Peonidin 3-arabinoside
Total Anthocyanins
2a
2b
ET
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Figure
2c
2c
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
b
c
d
546
8
11
2.0e-2
AU
5.00
10.00
15.00
(b)
5.00
25.00
10.00
30.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
12
9
4
10.00
40.00
15.00
13
TE
AU
2
1
5.00
35.00
13
10
0.0
40.00
12
7
15.00
(c)
35.00
10
0.0
20.00
2.0e-2
5.0e-2
14
5/6
0.0
4.0e-2
13
10
AU
(a)
20.00
25.00
30.00
Time
40.00
35.00
2
(a)
8.00
10.00
12.00
100
(b)
8.00
(c)
10.00
12.00
8.00
16.00
14.00
10.00
12.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
7
5
6
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
100
14.00
ET
100
AC
Fig. 2b. Flavonols and phenolic acid proles of (a) 10 ppm mixed avonol standards, (b) white cranberry extract (WCE), and (c) red cranberry extract (RCE) detected by
photodiode array at 340 nm. Peak ID, 1 = caffeic acid dihexose, 2 = caffeic acid mono-hexose, 3 = chlorogenic acid, 4 = sinapic acid mono-hexose, 7 = myricetin hexoside,
9 = myricetin pentoside, 10 = quercetin galactoside, 12 = quercetin pentoside, 13 = quercetin rhamnoside.
4
3
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
Time
Fig. 2c. Procyanidin proles of (a) 10 ppm mixed procyanidin standards, (b) white cranberry extract (WCE), and (c) red cranberry extract (RCE) detected by uorescence at
excitation and emission wavelengths of 285 and 315 nm. Peak ID, 1 = protocatechuic acid hexoside, 2 = procyanidin B1, 3 = catechin, 4 = procyanidin B2, 5 = procyanidin C1,
6 = procyanidin trimer type A, 7 = procyanidin tetramer type A.
for the analysis. The uorescent prole of peaks in Fig. 2c.b and c
shows the largest peak at retention time at 22.9 min. The full scan
spectrum showed at distinct peak at 1151.5 amu which corresponds to a Type A tetramer. The MS-MS daughters of 1151.5 spectra of this compound gave a major fragment at 575.3 indicative of a
procyanidin trimer. This peak was therefore assigned as a procyanidin tetramer type A. Quantitation of the tetramer was made
using an RRF of 1 from the calibration curve of procyanidin C1.
Procyanidin contents were higher in WCE compared with RCE
(Table 2). The procyanidin tetramer values were 17.21 mg/100 g
547
2: Scan ES+
1.03e7
463.3
100
(a)
464.3
301.3
0
100
150
200
250
300
Cranberry_Samples_03292010_002 199 (17.360)
301.2
100
350
400
465.2
450
500
(b)
150
200
250
300
350
400
600
m/z
650
700
4: Daughters of 463ES+
1.30e6
TE
463.3
0
100
550
439.2
450
500
550
600
m/z
700
650
Fig. 3a. Full scan mass spectrum of peonidin 3-galactoside (peak 4 in Fig. 2a) eluting at 17.4 min in RCE, and (b) daughters of 463 MS-MS spectrum of peonidin 3-galactoside
(peak 4) eluting at 17.4 min in RCE.
(a)
113.2
375.2
125
150
175
200
161.2
117.1
225
250
275
300
325
100
503.3
342.3
AC
341.3
100
350
375
504.3
409.3
400
425
571.3
450
475
ET
525
550
575
600
m/z
503.2
(b)
341.1
146.1
179.2 191.1
131.2
196.1
125
150
175
200
236.1
240.2
225
250
293.2
275
300
325.1
325
425.1 440.0
353.0
350
0
100
500
375
400
425
450
504.3
556.1
469.8
475
577.2
578.2
500
525
550
575
600
m/z
Fig. 3b. MS- full scan spectra of caffeic acid dihexose (peak 1 in Fig. 3b) in white cranberry extract (WCE) with (a) 0.1% formic acid, CV = 20 V and (b) 2% formic acid, CV = 40 V.
548
179.3
161.3
100
341.4
323.1
135.3
0
100 120
221.4
140 160
180 200
280 300
380 400
420 440
520 540
m/z
161.4
179.3
100
341.2
140 160
180 200
263.8 286.5
246.9
199.2
TE
149.4
0
100 120
280 300
380 400
420 440
520 540
m/z
Fig. 3c. MSMS Daughter scans of 503 amu parent of caffeic acid dihexose (peak 1 in avonol chromatograms in Fig 3a) in mobile phase containing (a) 0.1% formic acid,
CV = 20 V and (b) 2.0% formic acid, CV = 40 V.
(a)
153.3
112.8
AC
315.3
100
316.3
181.1
383.3
351.2
451.2
350
400
450
500
550
600
350
400
450
500
550
600
m/z
650
700
2: Daughters of 315ES3.22e5
(b)
150
200
250
300
0
100
ET
0
100
150
200
250
300
cb_flav_msms_05142010_006 291 (10.777)
153.3
100
123.3
1: Scan ES6.10e5
650
700
m/z
Fig. 3d. (a) Full scan mass spectrum of protocatechuic acid hexoside (peak 1) in uorescence chromatogram of white cranberry extract (WCE) and (b) daughters of 315 amu
MS-MS spectrum of protocatechuic acid hexoside (peak 1) in uorescence chromatogram of WCE.
1.0 mg/ml, both RCE and WCE signicantly increased the phosphorylation of protein kinase B (Akt) via redox sensitive phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) in vitro in HUVEC relative to the basal
p-Akt level (i.e., PBS-control). In addition, no signicant difference
(p > 0.05) was observed in the relative phosphorylated Akt between RCE and WCE.
549
1.0 mg/ml
15000
10000
Basal p-Akt
5000
0
Control
RCE
Sample
WCE
AC
4. Discussion
0.2 mg/ml
20000
TE
25000
(g)
(j)
(e)
(h)
(k)
(f)
(i)
(l)
(d)
ET
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 4b. Effects of RCE and WCE on cell migration in in vitro HUVEC examined by wound healing assay. Endothelial cell monolayers were wounded at time 0 and cultured with
0.2 mg/ml of RCE or WCE. Photographs of PBS-control (a, b, and c), PI3 K inhibitor (d, e, and f), RCE (g, h, i), and WCE (j, k, l) were taken after 0, 5, and 24 h of incubation,
respectively.
The ability of the cranberry extracts to act as in vitro antioxidants may be associated with the phenolic contents of the berries.
Polyphenolic compounds are known to change the redox sensitivity of the cells. PI3 is a redox sensitive kinase and therefore PI3
kinase-mediated phosphorylated Akt levels in vitro in HUVEC were
determined upon exposure to red and white cranberry extracts.
Our ndings indicate that the abundant anthocyanins in red cranberries and the abundant procyanidins in white cranberries may
have partly contributed to the activation of Akt via redox sensitive
PI3-kinase-mediated signaling pathway in cultured HUVEC. The
phosphorylation of Akt is known to activate downstream signaling
that results in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation.
eNOS is an important regulator of cardiovascular homeostasis because it is the major catalyst for nitric oxide (NO) production in
vascular endothelial cells and plays a crucial role in the state of
blood vessel vasodilatation, and hence, maintain the vascular
integrity and regulate the blood pressure.
Grape-seed extract was used in this study as a positive control
since it is known to induce endothelium-dependent relaxation
through PI3 kinase/Akt signaling pathway (data not shown). Edirisinghe et al. demonstrated that in grape-seed extract, polyphenolic
compounds caused an endothelium-dependent relaxation of blood
vessels and that it was mediated by the activation of the PI3 K/Akt
signaling pathway through a redox-sensitive mechanism, resulting
in the phosphorylation of eNOS (Edirisinghe, Burton-Freeman, &
Kappagoda, 2008). The polyphenolic compounds in grape-seed extract are mostly proanthocyanidins which occur as mixtures of
oligomers and polymers of catechin and epicatechin. In addition,
the grape-seed extract consists mainly of dimers and trimers without gallic acid residues. Tetramers and pentamers, including larger
oligomers of proanthocyanidins, were responsible for the endothelium-dependent vasodilator effects demonstrated by (Fitzpatrick,
Bing, Maggi, Fleming, & OMalley, 2002). In cranberry extracts,
these oligomeric procyanidins were also abundant, thus, they
ET
AC
TE
550
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Fig. 4c. Effects of RCE and WCE on vessel formation in in vitro HUVEC examined by tube formation assay. Endothelial cell monolayers were cultured with 0.2 mg/ml of RCE
and WCE. Photographs of RCE-treated vessels: (a) with PI3K inhibitor, (b) with LY294002, (c) after 5 h, and (d) after 36 h of incubation. Photographs of WCE-treated vessels:
(e) with PI3K inhibitor, (f) with LY294002, (g) after 5 h, and (h) after 36 h of incubation. The PI3K inhibitor was 35 nmol/l wortmannin.
551
References
TE
Benzie, I. F. F., & Strain, J. J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a
measure of antioxidant power: The FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 239,
7076.
Bilyk, A., & Sapers, G. M. (1986). Varietal differences in the quercetin, kaempferol,
and myricetin contents of highbush blueberry, cranberry, and thornless
blackberry fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 34, 585586.
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical method
to evaluate antioxidant activity. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und -Technologie, 28,
2530.
Brown, P. N., & Shipley, P. R. (2011). Determination of anthocyanins in cranberry
fruit and cranberry fruit products by high-performance liquid chromatography
with ultraviolet detection: single-laboratory validation. Journal of AOAC
International, 94, 459466.
Celik, H., Ozgen, M., Serce, S., & Kaya, C. (2008). Phytochemical accumulation and
antioxidant capacity at four maturity stages of cranberry fruit. Scientia
Horticulturae, 117, 345348.
Edirisinghe, I., Burton-Freeman, B., & Kappagoda, T. (2008). Mechanism of the
endothelium-dependent relaxation evoked by a grape seed extract. Clinical
Science, 114, 331337.
Edirisinghe, I., Burton-Freeman, B., Varelis, P., & Kappagoda, T. (2008). Strawberry
extract caused endothelium-dependent relaxation through the activation of PI3
kinase/Akt. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56, 93839390.
Edirisinghe, I., Lu, B., Nalbandyan, M., & Kappagoda, C. (2007). Grape seed extract
induced nitric oxide mediated endothelial dependent relaxation through AKT/
PI3 kinase pathway. FASEB Journal, 21. A1232A1232.
Fitzpatrick, D. F., Bing, B., Maggi, D. A., Fleming, R. C., & OMalley, R. M. (2002).
Vasodilating procyanidins derived from grape seeds. Alcohol and Wine in Health
and Disease, 957, 7889.
Foo, L. Y., Lu, Y. R., Howell, A. B., & Vorsa, N. (2000a). The structure of cranberry
proanthocyanidins which inhibit adherence of uropathogenic P-mbriated
Escherichia coli in vitro. Phytochemistry, 54, 173181.
Foo, L. Y., Lu, Y. R., Howell, A. B., & Vorsa, N. (2000b). A-type proanthocyanidin
trimers from cranberry that inhibit adherence of uropathogenic P-mbriated
Escherichia coli. Journal of Natural Products, 63, 12251228.
Giusti, M. M., Wrolstad, R. E., et al. (2005). Characterization and measurement of
anthocyanins by UVvisible spectroscopy. In R. E. Wrolstad, T. E. Acree, E. A.
Decker, M. H. Penner, D. S. Reid, & S. J. Schwartz, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of food
analytical chemistry (pp. 1924). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Hakkinen, S. H., Karenlampi, S. O., Heinonen, I. M., Mykkanen, H. M., & Torronen, A.
R. (1999). Content of the avonols quercetin, myricetin, and kaempferol in 25
edible berries. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47, 22742279.
Mazza, G., & Miniati, E. (1993). Anthocyanins in fruits, vegetables, and grains. Boca
Raton: CRC Press.
Mckay, D. L., & Blumberg, J. B. (2007). Cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon) and
cardiovascular disease risk factors. Nutrition Reviews, 65, 490502.
Meyers, K. J., Watkins, C. B., Pritts, M. P., & Liu, R. H. (2003). Antioxidant and
antiproliferative activities of strawberries. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry, 51, 68876892.
Mullen, W., McGinn, J., Lean, M. E. J., MacLean, M. R., Gardner, P., Duthie, G. G.,
Yokota, T., & Crozier, A. (2002). Ellagitannins, avonoids, and other phenolics in
red raspberries and their contribution to antioxidant capacity and
vasorelaxation properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50,
51915196.
Neto, C. C. (2011). Cranberries: ripe for more cancer research? Journal of the Science
of Food and Agriculture, 91, 23032307.
Ozgen, M., Reese, R. N., Tulio, A. Z., Scheerens, J. C., & Miller, A. R. (2006). Modied
2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) method to
measure antioxidant capacity of selected small fruits and comparison to ferric
reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,20 -diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)
methods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54, 11511157.
Prior, R. L., Fan, E., Ji, H. P., Howell, A., Nio, C., Payne, M. J., & Reed, J. (2010). Multilaboratory validation of a standard method for quantifying proanthocyanidins
in cranberry powders. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90,
14731478.
Prior, R. L., Lazarus, S. A., Cao, G., Muccitelli, H., & Hammerstone, J. F. (2001).
Identication of procyanidins and anthocyanins in blueberries and cranberries
(Vaccinium spp.) using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 12701276.
ET
AC
5. Conclusion
This study provides evidence that phenolic constituents such as
anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, avonols and phenolic acids,
contribute to the antioxidant and biological properties of red and
white cranberries. Our data suggest that similarities in the overall
phenolic proles and total antioxidant properties of red and white
cranberries may likely explain why the activation of p-Akt did not
differ between red and white cranberry extract-treated HUVECs. In
addition, polyphenolic compounds derived from red and white
cranberry extracts may have caused the induction of redoxsensitive PI3 kinase/Akt pathway and activated downstream
signals resulting in endothelial cell migration and vessel formation.
552
Tulio, A. Z., Chang, C., Edirisinghe, I., White, K. D., Jablonski, J. E.,
Banaszewski, K., Kangath, A., Tadapaneni, R. K., Burton-Freeman, B., &
Jackson, L. S. (2012). Berry fruits modulated endothelial cell migration
and angiogenesis via phosphoinositide-3 kinase/protein kinase b pathway
in vitro in endothelial cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60,
58035812.
Vvedenskaya, I. O., & Vorsa, N. (2004). Flavonoid composition over fruit
development and maturation in American cranberry, Vaccinium macrocarpon
Ait. Plant Science, 167, 10431054.
Zhishen, J., Mengcheng, T., & Jianming, W. (1999). The determination of avonoid
contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food
Chemistry, 64, 555559.
ET
AC
TE