Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT 3
Q : Discuss the roles of technologies in promoting the scientific literacy
assignment, I would like to focus the discussion on the use Data-logger or Microcomputer
Based Laboratory (MBL) and the collection of data with the aid of sensors (probwares) and
computers, as part of practical work in science
As for the definition of scientific literacy, in this assignment we should see that
scientific literacy as a whole different context with science literacy even though the two
terms have always been used interchangeably. For example, American Association for the
Advancement of Science (1989 ; in Holbrook & Rannikmae, 2009) has been using the term
science literacy to refer to the scientific literacy. In this assignment, the scientific literacy
should not be taken as to mean the knowledge of a lot of science but rather the
understanding of how science really works (Durrant, 1994).
According to National Science Education Standards:
Thowalter (1974; cited in Laugksch, 2000), has define scientific literacy in seven
dimensions:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
The scientifically literate person interacts with the various aspects of his
universe in a way that is consistent with the values that underlie science.
v.
vi.
The scientifically literate person has developed a richer, more satisfying, and
more exciting view of the universe as a result of his science education and
continues to extend this education throughout his life.
vii.
In this assignment, I will refer to the above mentioned scientific literacy to give a
clear direction of the discussion.
Technology such as Microcomputer Based Laboratories (MBL) is one of the ICT
applications in science laboratories that can be practically used in schools. The tool consist
of one or more sensors or probewares that are connected to an interface which is usually
an analogue-digital converter that allow real time visualization of the variables of an
experiment and provides the possibility of measuring magnitudes which are difficult to
measure with traditional equipment. Pertinent software allows programming the frequency
of measures, and the data format (table, kind of graph) to be presented on the computer
screen. Using this technology, predictions and hypothesis formulated by learners can have
easy, quick and precise feedback ratification.
Novak & Gleason (2001) have done a detail research about management and
organizing computer-aided practical work that use portable handheld probewares in the
Our Water Project using project-based learning to promote students inquiry in learning.
Students that were divided in groups were actually design and carry out a plan of their own
to investigate the cleanliness of their adopted portion of the stream. Using portable
technology as scientific instruments, students collect and analyse various quantitative
water-quality data along with qualitative data to make conclusions about the health of the
stream. Using the portable technology, the students are provided with scientific tools that
enable them to do the science just like the real scientist do. The students also learn to
learn independently without the cookbook instruction and practicing good data collection
and problem-solving techniques. In addition, the students value the roles of technology in
learning.
The technology of portable handheld devices gives the opportunity to the students
to use the scientific tools that are similar to those scientists use in students' hands. This
will create more opportunities for the students to design and carry out meaningful
investigations and to answer questions posed by their own "what if questions.
The roles of technology in promoting scientific literacy are no longer new to many
countries. It is our time to start taking serious action so that our future generation can
benefit the technology toward the scientifically literate society.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Beak, Y., Jung, J., & Kim, B. 2008. What makes teachers use technology in the classroom?
Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computer &
Education. 50, 224-234.
Dani, D. (2009). Scientific Literacy and Purposes for Teaching Science: A Case Study of
Lebanese Private School Teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science
Education, 4(3), 289299.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International
Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275288.
Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual Overview. Science Education, 84(1),
7194.
Novak, A. M., & Gleason, C. I. (2001). Incorporating Portable Technology to Enhance an
Inquiry, Project-Based Middle School Science Classroom. In Portable Techonologies
(pp. 2962). New York.
Soloway, E., Grant, W., Tinker, R., Roschelle, J., & Hands, T. (1999). Science in the Palms
of Their Hands. Communication of the ACM, 42(8), 2126.
Thornton, R. K. (1987). Microcomputer-Based Laboratories for the Naive Science Learner.
Collegiate Microcomputer, 5(1), 100106.