Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Early in this century, little known about DNA; regarded as uninteresting junk
Proteins were thought to be the only truly complex molecules in cells, and
therefore must be responsible for heredity
1928: Frederick Griffith discovered phenomenon of transformation in
bacteria
1. Used organism Streptococcus pneumoniae.
2. Strep bacillus has two forms:
1. slimy colonies (S strain) forms mucous capsules, survives attack
by macrophages in lung, kills mice
2. rough colonies (R strain) lacks capsules, quickly killed by
macrophage, no disease
3. When Griffith mixed heat-killed S-strain with live R-strain, resulting
organisms killed mice, and lungs were filled with S-strain.
4. View diagram of Griffith experiment
5. Conclusion: some chemical is surviving heat treatment, retains genetic
information, is able to transmit that information to some R-strain bacteria,
convert them to S. Griffith didn't know what was responsible.
1944: Avery, McCarty and MacLeod demonstrate that DNA is responsible for
transformation in bacteria
1. Fractionated different chemicals in S-strain bacteria, tested each separately
to see what would cause transformation.
2. Isolated DNA could transform, but no other isolated fraction could (RNA,
protein, lipids, polysaccharides). Conclusion: DNA is transforming
principle
3. But critics attacked slight (less than 1%) presence of protein in the DNA
extracts used, claimed this might be responsible for transformation
1952: Hershey & Chase prove that only DNA is responsible for bacterial
virus infection of host cells.
1. Viruses (called phage if host cells are bacteria) are much simpler than
cells, contain only DNA & protein.
2. Hershey & Chase were able to use different radioactive isotopes to
distinguish DNA from protein: for DNA, used P-32 (lots of P in DNA, but
none in protein); for protein, used S-35 (proteins contain S in certain
amino acids, but DNA lacks S).
3. H&C grew phage in hosts with either P or S radioisotope. Then infected
different bacteria for short time, vortexed in blendor to separate phage
coats from cells, and separated phage (very small) from cells (larger) by
centrifugation.
4. Result: only P-32 isotope found in cells. All S-35 could be knocked loose
by blending, but cells were still infected and produced new phage.
Therefore only DNA, not protein, was responsible for inheritance
Structure of DNA
DNA known to contain purine & pyrimidine bases, deoxyribose, and phosphate -but how are they arranged?
1947: Chargaff published data showing that % of A, T, C, and G showed certain
regularities
1. % of bases varies from organism to organism
2. % A = % T, and % C = % G. This is called Chargaff's rule. What did it
mean?
1952: X-ray pictures of DNA taken by Rosalind Franklin in Wilkins lab in
London showed some kind of helix.
1953: Watson & Crick published a model built from Franklin data = double helix.
5'-CAGCTAGAGTCATCG-3'
3'-GTCGATCTCAGTAGC-5'
W&C also suggested simple model for replication: if double stranded DNA
uncoiled, each strand could serve as template for replication of new DNA. This
was an exciting experimental prediction, and many labs set out to try to prove it.
Replication of DNA
RNA primase: DNA polymerase III cannot start a growing chain from scratch; needs a
short primer (a few nucleotides) to add to. This is carried out by DNA-dependent RNA
primase, makes very short piece of RNA by base-pairing RNA nucleotides with template
DNA
DNA polymerase : adds new nucleotides at free 3'ends of growing chain, uses basepairing rules to insert complementary nucleotides (A opposite T, G opposite C, etc.) Can
keep on adding indefinitely for millions of nucleotides if not blockage. Also removes
RNA primers, fills in gaps by base pairing, inserts new DNA nucleotides to replace RNA
primer. (several types of this enzyme)
1. DNA ligase: seals any gaps where adjacent nucleotides on one strand have
not been covalently joined.
Note: many gaps result on lagging strand (see below), so lots of need for enzymes
(5) and (6).
Since two strands in DNA are antiparallel, new DNA must be synthesized in
opposite directions on the two template strands.
But overall, DNA must unwind in one direction (at replication fork), overall DNA
synthesis has one direction.
No problem for the strand growing in same direction as unwinding = leading
strand. Can make one long, continuous piece of DNA
Big problem for strand growing in opposite direction to unwinding = lagging
strand; must grow away from unwinding. As new template is opened up by DNA
unwinding, will have to start a new copy.
In fact, just this situation was discovered experimentally by Okazaki; found many
short DNA fragments newly synthesized from lagging strand = Okazaki