Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The (two) Keruvim stood miraculously - "V'Chamesh Amos Kenaf ha'Keruv ha'Echas v'Chamesh
Amos Kenaf ha'Keruv ha'Shenis..." (They stood next to each other, and the total span of all four
wings was 20 Amos, i.e. the entire length of the Kodesh ha'Kodoshim. We conclude that their
bodies (in between the wings) did not occupy space!)
Side note: Can not ask that the vessels of the Bais HaMikdash use a smaller size of amah
than the standard used to measure other sizes in the Bais HaMikdash, since these Keruvim
were connected to the ground and thus, not vessels.
Six Chachamim offer objections to the concept that a miracle occurred with the Keruvim
Objection #1 (Abaye): Perhaps (there was no miracle) the wings of each Keruv touched each other,
and the bodies were underneath, like chickens!
The wings of chickens meet in the back. Thus, according to this objection the wings’ span would
occupy the full 20 amos and the body would overlap the space that included the wings.
Objection #2 (Rava): Perhaps they did not stand next to each other!
Rashbam says the Keruvim were not in one line and thus, their width overlapped.
Rabenu Gershon says the Keruvim’s wings were not parallel to the ground, but at an angle.
Rabeinu Gershon offers a similar explanation that the diagonal of the wings was the inner wings.
Maharasha explains differently that the Keruvim were at a diagonal to the room and were at
opposite angles to each other.
Objection #4 (Rav Huna brei d'Rav Yehoshua): Perhaps the Kodesh ha'Kodoshim is 20 by 20 at the
bottom, but it is wider on top!
This object did not need a miracle to occur, since the room itself enabled the larger wingspan. The
room measured 20 X 20 at the floor, but was vertical walls bulged allowing greater room for the
wings, including the width of the bodies.
Objection #5 (Rav Papa): Perhaps the wings were bent!
Objection #6 (Rav Ashi): Perhaps the wings overlapped each other!