Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

USCA Case #14-5325

Document #1534669

Filed: 01/28/2015

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

JOSEPH ARPAIO,
Appellant-Plaintiff,

Case No. on Appeal: 14-5325

v.
BARACK OBAMA, ET AL.

Appellees-Defendants.

Appeal from U.S. District Court


Case No. 1:14-cv-01966 (BAH)

APPELLANTS CERTIFICATE AS TO
PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES
Plaintiff-Appellant Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio hereby certifies pursuant to
Circuit Rule 28(a)(1) that:
A. Parties and Amici
The parties that appeared in the District Court for the District of Columbia
(District Court) are Plaintiff-Appellant Joseph M. Arpaio, elected Sheriff of
Maricopa County, Arizona (Sheriff Arpaio).
Defendants-Appellees (1) Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, President of the
United States of America (President Obama), (2) Mr. Jeh Johnson, Secretary of

USCA Case #14-5325

Document #1534669

Filed: 01/28/2015

Page 2 of 4

the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and (3) Mr. Leon Rodriguez,
Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
No Amici Curiae participated at the District Court for D.C. level.
B. Rulings Under Review
The rulings under review are the Honorable Judge Beryl Howells (Judge
Howell) December 23, 2014 Memorandum Opinion and (Final) Order in the
District Court for D.C. granting Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of standing
under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 12(b)(1), which dismissed
all claims and entered judgment for Defendants. Judge Howells final order
terminated the case in the District Court. It was not, however, a ruling on the
merits but on standing.
C. Related Cases
Within this Circuit, Sheriff Arpaio is not a party to any related litigation.
Appellant is not aware of any other litigation concerning exactly the same issues
with regard to the Executive Branchs deferred action programs.
However, the case of Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, Civil Action No. 14-529 (ESH), in the District
Court raises similar challenges to other aspects of the Executive Branchs
executive action deferred action.

Dated: January 28, 2015

USCA Case #14-5325

Document #1534669

Filed: 01/28/2015

Page 3 of 4

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Larry Klayman


Larry Klayman, Esq.
D.C. Bar No. 334581
2020 Pennsylvania Ave. NW #345
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (310) 595-0800
Email: leklayman@gmail.com

USCA Case #14-5325

Document #1534669

Filed: 01/28/2015

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 28th day of January, 2015 a true and correct
copy of the foregoing was submitted electronically to the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit and served via CM/ECF electronic service upon
the following:

Scott R. McIntosh, Esq.


Jeffrey Clair, Esq.
William Havemann, Esq.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Civil Division, Appellate Staff
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Room 7259
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
Scott.McIntosh@usdoj.gov
Jeffrey.Clair@usdoj.gov
William.E.Havemann@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Larry Klayman


Larry Klayman, Esq.
D.C. Bar No. 334581
Freedom Watch, Inc.
2020 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.,
Suite 345 Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: (310) 595-0800
Email: leklayman@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellant

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi