Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Page | 48
III.
RESULT AND INTERPRETATION
Table 2: Results of base shear for different bracing and
for different staging height of staging for different seismic
zones
8 COL N 12M
8 COL R 12M
8 COL C 12M
Base shear
KN
ZONE
II
III
94.296
165.265
100.759
177.243
91.743
160.579
IV
276.67
297.907
268.44
8 COL N 16M
8 COL R 16M
8 COL C 16M
83.896
92.941
83.282
146.609
248.189
147.496
244.656
286.636
249.742
8 COL N 20M
8 COL R 20M
8 COL C 20M
79.58
83.832
72.782
141.634
150.009
126.369
241.069
256.774
209.39
TYPE OF
BRACING
V.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
REFERENCES
[1] Ayazhussain M. Jabar(2012) Seismic Behavior of
RC Elevated Water Tank under Different Staging
Pattern
and
Earthquake
Characteristics.
International journal of advanced engineering
research
and studies e-issn22498974,
IJAERS/Vol. I/ Issue III/April-June, 2012/293-296
[2] Madhukar Gaikwad and Madhuri Manglulkar,
(2013) seismic performance of circular elevated
water tank with framed staging system international
journal of advanced research in engineering and
technology (IJARET) ,ISSN 0976 6480(print),
ISSN 0976 6499(online) volume 4, issue 4, may
(2013).
[3] Bhavin patel and Dhara shaha(2010) Formulation of
Response Reduction Factor for RCC Framed
Staging of Elevated Water Tank using Static
Pushover Analysis Proceedings of the World
Congress on Engineering 2010 Vol IIIWCE 2010,
June 30 - July 2, 2010, London, U.K. ISBN: 978988-18210-8-9ISSN: 2078-0958 (Print); ISSN:
2078-0966 (Online).
[4] Durgesh C Rai, (2003) Performance of Elevated
Tanks in Mw 7.7 Bhuj Earthquake of January 26th,
2001 International journal of advanced engineering
research Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.),
112, No. 3, September 2003, pp. 421-429.
[5] Ayazhussain M. Jabar and H. S. Patel, (2012)
Seismic Behavior of RC Elevated Water Tank
under Different Staging Pattern and Earthquake
Characteristics. .International journal of advanced
Page | 50