INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW SCIENCE THEORY OF CREATION

December, 2013

N. Huntley, Ph.D.
There is clearly a need for a scientific theory of creation. There are many established
subjects that current science fails to explain adequately and, in fact, ignores completely
as not even valid or worthy of consideration. For example: spirituality, religion, the
paranormal, nature of consciousness and mind. We don't even have a proper science of
mindthe brain is the principal focus. Mainstream scientific community will point out
that the mind is merely a by-product of the brain; and even more disastrous, that
consciousness' causative role in life is an illusionand again a by-product of the brain.
We might note that we have scientific theories of the universe and life, that is, for
example, the Big Bang theory and Darwin's theory of evolution, but no one has
produced a science of creation. We may well ask why. Science will state it is simply
because scientific methodology cannot accept or tolerate a non-scientific term such as
God'; that is, a concept which is a substitute for everything without explaining anything.
The New Science, however, can do much better than this. The more scientificallyinclined individual tends to think that a disagreement with religion must take an opposite
standpoint to that subject. This is actually not a very rational response and this is what
creates the atheist. The atheist is simply opposing religious dogma, that is, he or she is
only opposing a religious interpretationwhich may be an old man with a white beard
sitting on a throne in the sky. If there were no inadequate religious descriptions of God,
Atheists would probably be agnostics. Atheists are generally intelligent people and when
they become aware of the incredible physics of the inner-space regions of the
holographic fractal system, interest in a completely different direction will be awakened.
The word creation' relates of course to religion, based on a world created by God. We
shall be using science as far as possible to develop this viewpoint. Firstly, why can't we
just bring together science and religion. These two subjects should be a single body of
knowledge, but they have been set up in a polarity relationship; each will destroy the
other if a reconciliation is attempted on that level. Science is imbalanced towards the
objective, and even tries to eliminate all subjectivity. Religion is biassed towards
subjectivitybeliefs and faithwith the dangers of falsehoods being introduced
knowingly or unknowingly. The objective and the subjective are two sides of the same
coinyou can't have one without the other. A proper academic course on the
relationship between objectivity and subjectivity would resolve many issues, including
the greatest scientific debate between Einstein and Bohr. (Ref.1)
In reconciling science and religion one must find the hidden contexts that are in conflict
and then introduce the higher-order context, which then places each of science and
religion in proper perspectiveeach is then a partial quantum reduction of the higher
context and can be unified within this context, forming, say, a spiritual science or
whatever one wishes to call it. This is explained in other works by the author. (2)

As far as possible we shall conform to acceptable scientific protocols in formulating a

theory of creation, even leave out the word God' and let the reader contemplate this
meaning. In any theory of creation it is so easy to fall into the trap of infinite regression',
meaning in this case to question what came before. When an origin requires some
explanation one can so easily expose the inadequacy by asking, What came before
that?' And repeatedly go into an infinite regression.
A theory of creation must satisfy as far as possible all tests of truth in physicsdualism,
infinite regression, preferential axes', generalisations and symmetry, etc. Fortunately we
have terms acceptable to science, such as infinite' and absolute', both of which do not
evoke a prior cause. Mainstream science studies essentially the particle interpretation of
reality, and any wholeness is simply an aggregate of particles held together (or
interacting) through forces. This is a composite whole and not a true whole or
integration. In a composite whole the whole equals the sum of the parts. In a natural or
harmonic wholeall features of natural creationthe whole is greater than the sum of
the parts. The latter case is the key to life and ultimately a valid creation theory.
A proper study of the relationship between the whole and the part would be found very
revealing and, in particular, the recognition of the whole as an undivided unitya
quantum state. Note that the New Science Theory of Creation recognises (as does
orthodox science) the wavelength as a natural whole unitthat it can't be divided.
(Though in fact it would be made up of particles below even the recognised subatomic
realm, all functioning coherently for one large quantum pulse; the wave is switching on
and offamplitude increasing and decreasingas it propagates in wave form.)
As more observations are made and evidence gathered on the whole/part relationship it
will become clear that the whole is hierarchically dominant over the part.* The whole will
be the master control over the part, whether it is an organ (whole) over the cell (part) or
a president over the lower ranks, or the wholeness of a work of art as opposed to the
part level (say, bits of paint stuck together by forces), or the holographic learning pattern
in skills, spanning a group of movements, rather than individual motionsindependence
of fingers is achieved by increasing control via greater wholes of movements. (3) *[Use
the figures at the end of the article where helpful.]
We thus find that there is a special relationship between integration (whole) and
differentiation (parts) and that this combines with holographic fractal principles. Thus if
the part/whole relationship within nature and the universe is fractal and holographic we
then know that all systems of creation begin with the whole, and then divide into parts,
for example, the highest fractal level of a tree is the tree trunk (whole), which comes
before the twigs (part).
In fact all that mainstream science has to do to reverse its fundamental tenets (in the
correct direction) is to recognise the significance of the structures, holographic and
fractal, and how they relate to creationfor example, the learning pattern in skills, which
is a 4D holographic template that houses programmes and converts nonlinear
information into linear information. In fact the learning pattern is an ideal example of the
relation between integration and differentiation, which clearly indicates the whole
determines the part. (4) The whole (a large wave) carries the smaller parts (fractal

waves). (5)
A thorough research into the workings of the learning pattern by the author shows that
accuracy and fine control over actions (differentiation) is greater the greater is the
organisation. The wholeness, quantum state, or the amount of movements spanned as
one whole is the determining factor. For example, in keyboard technique, the more
movement activity the learning pattern can span simultaneously (integration), the
greater the independence (differentiation) of finger action. (6) There is an extremely
important relationship between integration and differentiation. (7)
Let's say this again in a much simpler example. A stimulus response association
between two elements; for example, in Pavlov's experiments with dogs, the two items to
be associated are bell sound (stimulus) and salivating (response). These two factors
don't just stick together as science appears to assume, with no logical explanation. The
connectivity is frequency resonance and is achieved by a single quantum state of
consciousness or attention. The attention must span the two events in time, bell sound
and salivation to form the connectionof which the two factors stimulus and response
are then under the control of a third component, a single quantum state (see triad
principle (8)).
Why doesn't science recognise these greater wholes, these coherent states? Simply
because the method of detection used, scientific methodology, is in itself a lower order
than these coherent states, causing collapse of the wave function to the particle level.
The mind and consciousness only, can potentially access higher orders without this
quantum reduction (collapse) to lower truths. Science is failing to recognise the natural
principle of orders and their degrees. (9)
The whole, however, even if a coherent energy state, is still quantitative and fails the
infinite regression test. It would thus be unacceptable physics to regard this as a true
beginning, even if we called it the Holy Spirit' (think of a homogeneous unified field
everywhere). We must go beyond this, that is, beyond particles/antiparticles, waves,
frequency patterns, space and time, since these are all characteristics of a relative
system and are quantifiable.
We must introduce concepts that science cannot question with for instance, But what
came before?' Fortunately we have the absolute' term and infinity' or infinite', such as
in the quantum realm of infinite possibilities'. Both states absolute' and infinite' are
acceptable within science. A beginning state, which is absolute and infinite, cannot have
any degree of objectivity since the latter means there is separation. This separation'
would immediately imply a finite condition, such as containing particles, waves, space
and time.
The Absolute must thus contain nothing'* since everything that is something is finite.
The Absolute will be infinitely subjective from a scientific viewpoint and this is, in effect,
science's definition of nothing'. However, in the New Science Theory of Creation this
absolute infinite is very substantial'. For example, it includes the quantum realm of
infinite potential possibilities. *[Note the inverted commas here: there can be no such
thing as actually nothing.]

The model of God and all creation is most simplified by the fractal-tree analogy
explained thoroughly in the author's other material. The God concept is clearly at the
tree trunk fractal level. We would now imagine three large branches extending from the
trunk (the triad principle or the Trinity) (10) and continuing to multiply in fractal levels,
branches to twigs. This is a template, a formatting system to provide different degrees of
orders for different aspects of consciousness to explore by activating and selecting from
its infinite possibilities within the quantum realm.
The most important concepts of knowledge on this planet tend to be presented in
reverseto put it bluntly. The obvious one is that life comes from matter, rather than as
in the New Science that matter (a much lower order) comes from life (high order). This
might be considered to lead to the ultimate enigma, or simply a joke on mankind.
Observations on the basis of the top-down principle (trunk' first) and not science's
bottom-up (twigs' first) principle, tell us that we begin with the Infinite and Absolute.
Then from this, quantum-reduce this highest state, that is, format it, to produce finite
properties in a scale of decreasing subjectivity (and therefore increasing objectivity), a
gradient change from internal to external, forming dimensional levels in this holographic
fractal system for the exploration of consciousness. For this system, the Absolute must
express in relative terms.
The Absolute must go from an infinite condition to a finite one if it is to explore its infinite
possibilities. This is achieved by interface systems between the absolute and relative;
the holograph and fractal mechanisms satisfy this requirement. The fractal gradient is
achieved by imagining extending out telescopically' the different orders inherent within
the holograph. This results in a gradient of increasing degrees of objectivity as we move
away from the subjectivity of the Absolute down this scale. In effect, the Absolute
expresses outwards/downwards by an incremental system of imposed limitations.
How does the Absolute create these limitations? Firstly since this is a theory of creation
we can take the liberty of resorting to thought as primary. All the Absolute has to do is to
counteract a portion of itself; this causes two opposing flows. This state, experientially,
is the same as denying that portion.
Now the big problem for science here is the dualism of Absolute potential energy, which
is non-physical, and the relative states of existences (particles, waves, space and time).
How can Absolute nothing' achieve a something'? Taking liberties with creation's
thought process we can mitigate this objection by considering there is a kind of
condensation (catalytic action). On this basis we can present a weak analogy for this (in
particular, it must not have dualism in it, itself).
Consider the two states of matter, solid and vapour. We can use a fine mist (water
droplets) for the vapour and consider it invisible, and in dualistic contrast use ice as the
solid. We imagine that through ignorance we consider there is a dualism between these
apparently incompatible aspects, the solid, and an intangible one, the vapour. To us of
course there is no dualism, the vapour is a different state and can be condensed into
water, then frozen into ice. Thus the idea is that the Absolute, by thinking outside itself
(looking at self or denying a part) by counteraction, creates a degree of objectivitya

separation giving the first essence of energy (which is a flow) and matter (which is
balanced counteracting flows).
Let us return now to the subject of creation and its constructive limitations. Keep in mind
the triad principle in which the single overseeing state can act independently of the
divided parts that automatically manifest a lower status. That is, the two opposing states
of the Absolute, denying a portion of itself, are automatically overshadowed by the
original (undivided) Absolute. In fact the Absolute is extended into countless portions,
atoms, plants, races, planets, etc. with a fractal gradient of overseeing levels all the way
back to the Source, the undivided Absolute.
When one part counteracts another part of itself, a degree of objectivity is created and a
separate viewpoint manifests. Each doesn't know the other across that separation but if
there is access to the whole Absolute above', then they may take on the whole, the
original One again. This counteraction, two opposing flows, forms the basis of polarity, a
balanced condition which prevents the motion (waves/energy) from dispersing and thus
creates stable structures. The second significant step would be to form the structure of a
template (for a particular form). A template would be a specific mathematicallyorganised morphogenetic field. The same flows that created this would be passed into
this form-holding pattern/mould bringing about manifestation.
We imagine now the extension or divisions continuing down the fractal scale, forming
dimensional levels with barriers imposed between levels to prevent all the parts from
merging back into Source. These constructive limitations are of course very much
manipulated by negative beings, for example, the natural dimensional separation
between the 3D spectrum (our world) and the higher 4D spectrumthe soul levelis
abused, controlled, and reinforced. (11)
Thus the different degrees of these ordered dimensions are created by the Absolute
imposing different degrees of not-knowing by the counteraction principle from which
degrees of separation (of the Absolute) are achieved, with subsequent objectivity
(resulting in portions becoming a state of unconsciousness relative to another). In
considering the return of portions of consciousness back to Source, we see that basic
intelligence and evolution is ascension to higher orders (of the holographic fractal
multiverse). In religion this is what holiness means, becoming more holy; more whole (of
consciousness), a higher order. Higher orders are achieved by qualitative states of
behaviour, which quantum regenerate greater wholes.(12) By creating integration within
the lower level, that is, harmony and alignment (for example, parts into resonance), the
inherent higher orders (that already exist) are catalysed, that is, drawn in and the state
is raised to that higher levelthe higher the order, the greater the frequency.
Thus cosmic creation is a system of formatting the Absolute into relative quantities,
each (all aspects of existence) containing a portion of that absolute. The formatting
technology is the template. This will act like a mould, selecting the different finite orders
required from the absolute medium' of infinite nonlinear possibilities for the exploration
of consciousness. (Ocean analogy described in other work is useful.) (13)
The interface between the input mind (that portion of the Absolute) and the mind

mechanism itself is actually like the perfect, or ultimate, cyborg system (in principle).
That portion of the Absolute, for example, the human pure consciousness (not soul
since this includes a higher order of mind) is extended (also similar in principle to
bionics) by the machinery of particles and waves so subtly that one can't tell where it
changes from nothing' the nonquantifiable, to the something', the quantifiable. [The
author, in studying the nature of the learning pattern in skills, using introspection,
identified by direct inner perception the interface between the input consciousness and
the learning pattern (mind computer system).]
The fractal law allows specific levels (degrees of order) of the extended holograph to be
quantum-reduced into material existences in which formatted portions of the absolute
express in a specific dimension. This can be a dimensional framework, such as 3D or a
physical organic vehicle (human body), consisting of particles, waves, space and time.
This is a formatting procedure so that the subjective infinite Absolute can express in
finite ways to extract its possibilities. Thus the fundamental purpose of life is simply
existence in finite realities for the exploration of the absolute infinite possibilities (there
are of course other purposes: missions, contracts, programmes).
This is a creation theory but as far as possible it is being made compatible with science
and scientific terminology, allowing of course for a fundamental turn around in the cause
and effect principle, that is, New Science's top-down instead of science's bottom-up.
The first basic clarification for the foundations of a creation theory is that science must
recognise that in life, surrounding us ubiquitously, there are a few nonquantifiable
characteristics. Let us list these and the quantifiable properties.
Nonquantifiable aspects:
The aliveness' property; the experiential; basic sentience or awareness/consciousness.
Quantifiable aspects:
Particles, waves, field systems, frequency patterns, holographic and fractal systems,
templates, universes, mind, brain, body, all energy patterns whether detectable by
scientific method now or after millions of years of development in scientific
instrumentation.
Nonquantifiable characteristics are direct properties of the Absolute and can never be
detected by scientific method. A relative can never evaluate or understand an absolute.
However, since all life's aspects, consciousness in different forms, are portions of the
Absolute, life can (or we can) intuitively know such a state by its own nonquantifiable
characteristics; the experiential or basic awareness/sentience/knowing by being.
What else can be evaluated from the fundamentals? As we have implied, the
holographic fractal system is a natural product of formatting an interface between the
Absolute and the relative. Can we derive anything further from this? The infinite
Absolute of no particles, waves, or space and time must be considered to be infinitely
nonlinear (a difficult concept). The Absolute cannot really be divided since it is inherently
holographic and infinitely nonlinear. When any separation or objectivity apparently
occurs, every part, no matter how small, contains the whole and manifests on a lower
dimensional level of the fractal organisation of ordered natural limitations (dimensions,

degrees of freedom/randomness). The total state of knowing is not proportionately

available except by ascension up the fractal hierarchy.
This is where we arrive at expressions such as: Everything is everywhere at once;' As
above, so below, as within, so without; 'What is here is everywhere, what is not here is
nowhere'. Each part is everywhere in the wholethe whole has no right or left, or up or
down, or front or back. Thus the Absolute expresses out by a system of imposed
limitations.
How can we justify assuming that the Absolute is infinitely nonlinear? If it wasn't it
wouldn't be complete and would have finite aspects, meaning something or something
has preferred' a beginning state (that the origin has already been selected, implying an
earlier cause). This would thus fail as a test of truth' in physics. Tests of truth' are
reliable, for example, generalisation'. If a principle (or law) explained a few phenomena,
and then we find it generalises to more phenomena, its degree of truth is increasing
(since it is a higher order than first evaluated). Or if one scientist discovers particles are
spherical, and another scientist says they are cylindrically shaped, then we go for the
spherical, since it is the same shape for all observers/viewpoints (moving round the
object). The cylinder has a preferential axis, that is, will be rejected as not being
fundamental. This is similar to comparing the relative encoding system (selected by
man) of our computers, which is algebraic in nature; not natural as is the case of
nature/mind that utilises geometry, a universal absolute system. The basic geometry is
spheres within spheres (higher-dimensional vortices). We can easily see the fractal
levels of a tree (twigs, branches, larger branches to trunk), they are projected out in 3D
from the hidden vortices within inner space, which would appear as spinning spheres
within spheres and be recognised as holographic. The universe would be similar but
more complex. (14)
As we have implied, the holographic mechanism is a composite system of different
orders, and the fractal scale begins with the highest order (for example, trunk of a tree).
We might see some similarity between this description of the holograph (with different
orders), and the hierarchy of universe dimensions created from the infinite nonlinear
Absolute.
Thus anything less than infinite completeness (infinitely nonlinear) has a preference and
must be unacceptable in a sound and logical theory. Realise that normal thinking
assumes that an imaginary solid 3D uniform entity is complete (totally filled in'). But the
simultaneity, the superposition and the superimposition in an infinitely nonlinear manner
gives an imaginary infinite density. Thus all creation must be a (quantum) reduction from
the greatest whole to finite, formatted aspects appropriate to the dimension to be
explored; that is, assigned to a corresponding limitation for the exploration of its infinite
possibilities. These states are limited orders in a limited dimension with prospects of
ascension to greater possibilities and orders.
How might this universe system or cosmos begin? Retaining a logical approach as far
as possible we can say that western religion, starting with God' (creator of all) then
projects out' the Trinity (Holy Spirit, Father and Son). In the New Science, the first state,
Spirit, would be a neutral energy state. This state would of course be subject to

considerable physics speculation. However, we can call it the unified field from which
everything springsthe whole of this would correspond to the Holy Spirit (note the
words whole' and Holy' from the same root). Since this can be considered to be way
beyond current scientific knowledge, it is acceptable as a temporary speculation for a
theory. The other two entities in the triad would follow the Holy Spirit and would have to
be the magnetic and the electrical. Remember this would be a vast division; the One'
extending into three. All entities are/contain a corresponding portion of the Absolute,
which have the nonquantifiable characteristics. With our definition of Absolute, every
piece of creation, atoms, species, planets, has a portion of the nonquantifiable
characteristics, such as consciousness, the experiential, etc. And that includes the
templates (morphogenetic fields) themselves which hold those portions.
Since this is a creation theory we need to occasionally make the links to religious
knowledge. We agree with quantum physics that underlying all creation are frequency
patterns filling all space, matter, dimensions, etc. Now basically a frequency contains a
sound component (this is scalar infra sound) and a light component (electromagnetic).
Christianity, in the creation of the universe, refers to the word of God', and then there
was light'. In a scientific creation theory we find that word' is referring to soundthus
the (scalar) sound energy came firstthis will also be found to create the scalar-sonic
magnetic component. Then there was light, which is now the electric (electricity)
component. Note that on a higher level, magnetism comes first, not electricity, as
emphasised by current science.
To recap, the whole (Absolute) thus limits itself down a gradient scale, the holographic
fractal hierarchy, reducing degrees of order and unification, increasing objectivity and
separateness, to experience and discover these relative states, forever qualifying itself
and forever becoming. Note that between these selected dimensional fractal levels
there is apparent randomness for freewill. The process by which this is achieved is one
in which the Absolute simply denies a portion of itselfthis is a counteractionthat
portion is still living but is separate from the origin. Immediately a degree of space
(objectivity) is createdwith the potential for time. But the original state remains and
oversees the divided self or selves in this fractal hierarchy.
A very important feature of the New Science, and another example that indicates how
backward we are on this planet, with no science of the mind, there is no understanding
of the principle that to every action there is a consequence (and the New Science will
recognise this as universal). In particular, and of considerable interest is when the action
is detrimental to life or truth in some manner. We call this karma on our planet, but this
is only a reflection of the larger universal principle which might be referred to as an
immune system or even an antivirus programme. The purpose is to protect the universe
and life in general.
Think of it as follows. The multiverse is fractal and holographic at a basic level since it
all came from the Absolute, which is inherently whole, all parts in the
expressed/materialised universe are, at the basic level, in harmony. The elements of the
holographic mechanism from small to whole are aiding one another; are in phase. No
flow of energy currents are out of mathematical alignmentit is an aligned system (this
is what Divine means, such as in sacred geometry). Recall that consciousness coming

into this universe system has gone through a series of energy formatting processes as
explained above, the final product, say, the human being, is endowed with countless
fields in different formats, frequencies and template geometries (99% (not detectable by
current scientific instrumentation) extending up the fractal system. Many of these fields
are aligned with the universeplanets, stars, galaxies, etc.
Keep in mind the holograph as an aligned, holistic system, each portion is supporting
every other portion on all scales. If we personify this we can say that it has a higher
standard of integrity and therefore ethics than humans are displaying on this planet.
The important point to be made now is when, say, the human carries out a harmful
action on another. In terms of physics, this is a counteraction within the integrity of the
whole system. For one unit of life to harm another to the detriment of the whole that unit
must block off the viewpoint (or already be blocked) of the other. This is an impairment
in the mind. Moreover, as each act is recorded in the mind of the perpetrator there is an
incremental conversion of consciousness into unconsciousness. (15)
Note the holographic property of the whole within the part. For the reader not familiar
with the structure of the holograph, if we cut up the hologram photographic plate to any
size, the full holographic image will be projected when the laser is shone through. This
is a quantitative mechanical reflection of an Absolute property. Thus a tiny speck of the
Absolute within, say, an atom has a tiny degree of intelligence and consciousness, but
its higher components (or aspects of consciousness leading all the way back to the
infinite Source, God) are restricted deliberately (by design). Nevertheless the tiny spark
of God essence has a line to Source (even if the tiny spark is unconscious of the
Source), not to mention that the human state similarly goes back to the Source.
This means our natural state (prior to massive formatting) is the essence of the quantum
realm (the quantum reality is consciousness). That is, a state of no time or space (as we
know it), a state of pure wholeness, totally inviolate in this condition and (relative to us)
functioning on simultaneousness, multidimensionality, instantaneousness, superposition
and superimposition. It is easy to see that flashes of religious enlightenment could occur
but quickly translate into intellectual quantitative properties of spacetime, particles,
waves, and the memory of the multidimensional experience is lost. It is also easy to see
how science can become stuck in the quantitative modeof tiny parts stuck together by
forces. The parts are separate, that is, not in harmony. The original portion of the
Absolute, the (whole) quantum of consciousness endowment, is not detected (wave
function collapsed) and science will assign reality to the part. On this planet,
consciousness is essentially lost in the complexities of matter and machineryit has
lost touch with what it is.
What we are trying to say here is that the craziness' of the quantum reality (quantum
physics) is normal for consciousnessthis indicates how lost we have become. This is
why perception of unity is so lacking on this planet and there is deterioration in
understanding true art and music, and even behaviour, in fact, qualitative states, in
general, are degrading to quantitative states. The true path of intelligence and
evolution/ascension is via behaviour, such as responsibility, integrity, ethics,
benevolence, humility, etc. These are all frequency patterns that are in cooperation with

the natural universe and will guarantee the best path of survival (in an existence such as
ours), the path of the higher orders in the fractal system. It is a question of re-alignment
with the (Divine) energy patterns of creation. This is what is meant in religion when one
refers to getting back to God.
After all the discussion about what the universe is, what does the New Science tell us
about the human? Clearly we are taking the stance that the human being is not just a
brain and body as orthodox science teaches.
The human is infinitely more complexand we mean infinitely. Firstly, we have a brain
and body, both of which degenerate during a typical life (due to the state of the DNA).
Secondly, however, there are many more features that do not deteriorate. There is a
mind, a complex energy system of frequency patterns, and an input to this mind, which
we relate to our viewpoint, the true self identity, the conscious mind.
This input, however, is not just a portion of the Absolute. It contains higher orders of
mind (inner-space particles and waves of higher frequency). There is now a fractal
system of conscious minds extending up the hierarchy; what we have referred to as
higher aspects of consciousness. The next fractal level above' us is the abode of the
soul. Thus the soul is a superior, higher aspect of our 3D mind consciousness. We
(here) don't have the soul as much as it has usthat is, we are extensions of the soul.
At this soul level its input, which is now the second-order mind, contains also the higher
orders, third, fourth fractal levels, and so on up the hierarchy. This is what we meant by
stating the human is infinitely more complex.
The dimensional system is a standard three orthogonal dimensions (directions at right
angles). At our first fractal level it is denoted by D1, D2, D3. Note that dimensions D2
has a higher frequency spectrum than D1, and D3 higher than D2. The second soul
fractal level, has dimensions D4, D5, D6. The next level D7, D8, D9 has been called the
oversoul level, and so on. This is the most satisfactory design layout of the dimensions
and has been revealed by guardian extraterrestrials. (16) One can now see how
complex the human being ishaving a mind that goes all the way back to the Absolute
just as a twig connects all the way to the trunk.
What changes would be required for current orthodox science to be compatible with the
New Science Theory of Creation? The many changes (listed in the book The Emerging
New Science) would automatically be revealed by science recognising us on the first
fractal level 3D of the holographic hierarchy of dimensional orders, then removing the
barrier between the third-dimensional spectrum and the fourth. Science would then be
elevated from a nonharmonic science with technologies that produce pollution, harmful
energies and limited energy sources, to a harmonic science from which would be
derived abundance of harmonious energies. For example, antigravity and its associated
knowledge fits above the 3D-4D boundary, taking it into the realm of harmonic science
(and free energy in the homeno cost). Unfortunately any scientific pioneer or even a
university professor researching antigravity will be warned (which may take the form of
ridicule) and the experimental data suppressed. (17)
The following figures, taken from other author articles and books, can be used to aid

understanding of the above text.

Figure 1, taken from the book: The Emerging New Science.

Figue 25, taken from the book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science.

Figure 25, taken from the book: The Emerging New Science.

Figure 26, taken from the book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science.

References:
1. Book: The Emerging New Science.
2. Ibid. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The Fractal Tree.
3. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Articles on skills, and book: Attainment of Superior
Physical Abilities.
4. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The New EducationReconciling Science and
Religion.
5. Book: The Emerging New Science.
6. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Articles on skills, music and physical abilities.
7. Book: The Attainment of Superior Physical Abilities.
8. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The New EducationTriad Principle.
9. Book: The Emerging New Science.
10. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk, Article: The New EducationTriad Principle.
11. Book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science.
12. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: Quantum Regeneration: A Major Scientific
Omission.
13. Book: The Emerging New Science.
14. Ibid.
15. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The Mechanics of Karma.
16. Book: Voyagers vol.2 by A. Deane.
17. Book: The Emerging New Science.