Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
7 0 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 2 1 5 2 2 3
Available at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/carbon
a,*
,
b,*
,
Yu-Ming Chang
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung 81148, Taiwan
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
scattering effect. A high enhancement factor of about 104, better than those reported for
1.
Introduction
216
CARBON
7 0 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 2 1 5 2 2 3
2.
Experiment
2.1.
2.2.
The as-prepared nanostructures were examined by fieldemission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) with a
Hitachi 4800, X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a D/MAX-2500,
field-emission transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM)
and energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) with a Philips Tecnai G2 F20 FEG-TEM for morphology, crystallography, microstructure, and composition characterization, respectively.
The functional groups of the GO and rGO/ZnO samples were
characterized by FTIR with a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100.
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed with
a TA, SDT-A600 thermogravimetric analyzer at a heating rate
of 15 C/min under nitrogen. About 15 mg GO and 0.24 mg
rGO/ZnO powders were taken for measurement. The electrical properties were measured by depositing two Au electrodes
on the rGO/ZnO composites and the current was measured at
a fixed bias of 1 V. The gap between the electrodes was about
2 mm.
SERS measurements were performed with a Jobin Yvon
LabRAM HR800 Raman spectrometer equipped with a
532 nm HeCd laser as the excitation sources. The laser power
3.
3.1.
Morphologies, microstructures, and crystal structures
of the rGO/ZnO composites
Based on the SEM results, the morphologies of the GO/ZnO
composites show significant variations after annealing at different temperatures. Fig. 1(a) and (b) show the SEM images of
the ZnO NRs and GO/ZnO composites before annealing,
respectively. The GO flakes are uniformly attached to the surface of the NRs. After annealing at 150200 C for 1 h, the GO
flakes were transformed into film-like structures, and small
dots of lighter contrast were generated on the films, as shown
in Fig. 1(c) and (d). As the annealing temperature was increased, the dots gradually enlarged and aggregated, as
shown in Fig. 1(e) and (g).
Fig. 2(a) and (d) show the TEM characterizations of the
GO/ZnO composites without annealing. As seen in the
bright-field (BF) image of Fig. 2(a), the GO flakes were
connected to a ZnO NR. Notably, the surfaces of the NR were
relatively rougher compared with the original ZnO NR (not
shown). Fig. 2(b) and (c) are the electron diffraction patterns
(DPs) of the ZnO NR and GO flakes marked in Fig. 2(a). The
ZnO NR remains a single-crystalline wurtzite structure growing along the c-axis. The DP of the GO flakes shows multi-ring
characteristics, indicative of poly-crystalline structures.
Fig. 2(d) is the dark-field (DF) image of the GO/ZnO composites. It can be seen that there are a few NPs of light contrast
embedded in the GO flakes, which were subsequently characterized as ZnO NPs.
Fig. 1 SEM images of as-prepared (a) ZnO NRs and (b) GO/ZnO composites; GO/ZnO composites annealed at (c) 150 C, (d)
200 C, (e) 250 C, (f) 300 C, and (g) 400 C for 1 h.
CARBON
7 0 (2 0 1 4) 2 1 522 3
217
Fig. 2 TEM characterization of pristine GO/ZnO composites. (a) BF image; (b, c) electron DPs from area b and c in (a) for the
ZnO NR and GO flakes, respectively; (d) DF image of the composites. (A color version of this figure can be viewed online.)
Fig. 3 TEM characterization of rGO/ZnO composites after annealing at 200 C. (a) BF image with inset showing electron DP of
a ZnO NR; (b) electron DP of rGO flakes; (c) DF image and (d) electron DP of rGO flakes and the generated ZnO NPs. (A color
version of this figure can be viewed online.)
3.2.
The results presented above indicate that ZnO NPs are generated on the rGO flakes, and their growth mechanisms can be
explained as follows. When the GO aqueous solutions were
dropped onto the ZnO NRs, the ZnO were dissolved in the
solution by reacting with the carboxyl groups (ACOOH) on
the surface of GO, as in the following formula [13]:
ZnO 2R-COOH ! R-COO 2 Zn2 H2 O
218
CARBON
7 0 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 2 1 5 2 2 3
Fig. 4 TEM characterization of rGO/ZnO composites after annealing at 400 C. (a) BF image; HR images of the (b) ZnO NP and
(c) rGO flake marked in (a); (d) electron DP of rGO flakes; (e) BF image and EDS characterization of ZnO NPs/rGO composites. (A
color version of this figure can be viewed online.)
Fig. 5 XRD patterns of (a) GO flakes, and (b) GOZnO composites before and after annealing at different temperatures. (A color
version of this figure can be viewed online.)
3.3.
Variation of functional groups, thermogravimetric
analysis, and proposed mechanisms
Fig. 7(a) shows the FTIR spectra of the GO/ZnO composites
with different heat treatments. The sample without annealing
exhibits signals corresponding to C@O, OH, COOH, C@C, and
ZnO. The oxygen-containing groups, especially C@O, significantly increase as the annealing temperature rises from
RT to 200 C, and abruptly decrease as it increases to
250400 C. The increase in the functional groups at
150200 C is abnormal compared with common GO samples,
CARBON
7 0 (2 0 1 4) 2 1 522 3
219
Fig. 6 Proposed growth mechanisms of the various rGOZnO composites by annealing. (A color version of this figure can be
viewed online.)
Fig. 7 (a) FTIR spectra of GO/ZnO composites before and after annealing at different temperatures; (b) TGA thermograms of
GO flakes and GO/ZnO composites. (A color version of this figure can be viewed online.)
radicals then undergo radical propagation reactions and attack the hydroxyls, carboxyls, and epoxides. As shown in
Fig. 8, these radical reactions are as follows: (a) attacking
hydroxyls and resulting in the formation of carbonyl radicals,
(b) attacking carboxyls and resulting in the formation of carboxylate radicals and the subsequent decomposition of carboxylates, (c) attacking epoxides in the presence of water,
220
CARBON
7 0 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 2 1 5 2 2 3
Decomposition of GO
Formation of free radicals
H2O Heat
Heat
2 H2O
O2
HO
+ H
4 HO
Attack on (a) hydroxyls, (b) decarboxylation, and (c) ring-opening of epoxides by free radicals
(a) Attack on hydroxyls
ketone
O
epoxide
O
O
HO
HO
hydroxyl
OH
COOH
ether
HO
HO
HOOC
O
OH
carboxyl radical
epoxide
(c) Ring-opening of epoxides
H2O
C
O
O
O
OH
+ CO/CO2
H2O
heat
HO
HO
H2O
heat
HO
COOH
OO
O
+ CO/CO2
(b) Decarboxylation
carboxyl
HO
C
carbonyl radical
HOOC
H2O
heat
C
H2O
heat
HO
C
e-
+ CO/CO2
O
OH
COOH
e-
O
HO
ZnO
heat
HO
HOOC
COOH
RT to 200oC
200 to 400oC
O
carboxyl radical
C
+ CO/CO2
O
HO
HOOC
heat
OH
HO
+ CO/CO2
carbonyl radical
OO
VB
O
carbonyl radical
O2-
heat
CB
+ CO/CO2
O
carbonyl radical
H2OOHe
GO
Fig. 8 Schematic of the decomposition of GO in the presence of free radicals and proposed functionalizing mechanisms of
rGO by coupling with ZnO at moderate temperature. (A color version of this figure can be viewed online.)
CARBON
7 0 (2 0 1 4) 2 1 522 3
221
Fig. 9 Raman spectra of R6G molecules on (a) various substrates, and (b) GO/ZnO composites with different annealing
treatments; (c) enhancement factors of various SERS substrates; (d) electrical measurements of rGO/ZnO composites annealed
at different temperatures. (A color version of this figure can be viewed online.)
3.4.
Improved
applications
SERS
effects
for
chemical
sensing
222
CARBON
7 0 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 2 1 5 2 2 3
the EF values of the rGO samples annealed at different temperatures do not show obvious difference. In addition to the
peak at 1190 cm1, other main vibrational modes of R6G were
also compared (see Fig. S2 and Table S1 of the Supplementary
materials), and the EF values for other peaks are also around
104. Since the electrical conductivities of substrates are critical for physical SERS effects, the electrical properties of the
rGO/ZnO samples with different annealing temperatures
were measured and shown in Fig. 9(d). At a fixed bias of 1 V,
the current increases with the annealing temperature from
RT to 400 C. It appears that the physical effects are not
responsible for the strong SERS effects of the rGO/ZnO sample
annealed at 200 C. On carefully checking the peak positions
of R6G on different substrates, including Si, ZnO NRs, and
GO/ZnO composites annealed at different temperatures, we
found that there is only negligible shift (see Table S2 of the
Supplementary materials). Therefore, the enhancement
mechanism should not be the effect of charge-transfer or
chemical bonding between R6G and functional groups on
rGO [7,18] because the above mechanisms will affect the geometrical or electronic structure of the adsorbed molecules,
leading to significant spectral shifts [19]. Therefore, the
enhancement may be attributed to the local electric field on
molecules generated by the highly electronegative oxygencontaining functional groups under the laser excitation from
their strong local dipole moments [20]. In the work, we
adopted the dropping [21,22] rather than soaking [20,23]
method to prepare SERS samples, so the number of molecules
per unit area should be identical irrespective of the morphologies of the nanostructures changed with different annealing
temperatures because the samples were all fully covered by
the drops. Although the signal of R6G on the annealed rGO/
ZnO composites is not pretty high, the EF value is estimated
by comparing the respective signal intensity per molecule under the same parameters of SERS measurements. Because the
number of R6G molecules on the rGO/ZnO samples is only
one thousandth of that on the Si substrate by considering
the difference in concentration, the high EF value of 104 is derived. By testing some R6G solutions with different concentrations, we can know the lowest R6G concentration on the
annealed ZnO/rGO sample that all the main Raman peaks still
can be detected is about 108 M (see Fig. S3 in the Supplementary materials). This work demonstrates that rGO could be
effectively functionalized by coupling with ZnO at moderate
temperature, which leads to excellent chemical SERS effects
for bio-chemical sensing applications.
4.
Conclusion
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Science Council of
Taiwan under the Grant (NSC100-2221-E-390-009-MY3).
R E F E R E N C E S
[1] Chen YL, Hu ZA, Chang YQ, Wang HW, Zhang ZY, Yang YY,
et al. Zinc oxide/reduced graphene oxide composites and
electrochemical capacitance enhanced by homogeneous
incorporation of reduced graphene oxide sheets in zinc oxide
matrix. J Phys Chem C 2011;115:256371.
[2] Zhang DW, Li XD, Li HB, Chen S, Sun Z, Yin XJ, et al.
Graphene-based counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar
cells. Carbon 2011;49:53828.
[3] Zhang H, Lv XJ, Li YM, Wang Y, Li JH. P25-graphene composite
as a high performance photocatalyst. ACS Nano 2010;4:3806.
[4] Kaniyoor A, Jafri RI, Arockiadoss T, Ramaprabhu S.
Nanostructured Pt decorated graphene and multi walled
carbon nanotube based room temperature hydrogen gas
sensor. Nanoscale 2009;1:3826.
[5] Hu CF, Rong JH, Cui JH, Yang YH, Yang LF, Wang YL, et al.
Fabrication of a graphene oxidegold nanorod hybrid
material by electrostatic self-assembly for surface-enhanced
Raman scattering. Carbon 2013;51:25564.
[6] He SJ, Liu KK, Su S, Yan J, Mao XH, Wang DF, et al. Graphenebased high-efficiency surface-enhanced Raman scatteringactive platform for sensitive and multiplex DNA detection.
Anal Chem 2012;84:46227.
[7] Huh S, Park J, Kim YS, Kim KS, Hong BH, Nam JM. UV/ozoneoxidized large-scale graphene platform with large chemical
enhancement in surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS
Nano 2011;5:9799806.
[8] Sun ST, Wu PY. Competitive surface-enhanced Raman
scattering effects in noble metal nanoparticle-decorated
graphene sheets. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011;13:2111620.
[9] Liu AP, Xu T, Ren QH, Yuan M, Dong WJ, Tang WH. Graphene
modulated 2D assembly of plasmonic gold nanostructure on
diamond-like carbon substrate for surface-enhanced Raman
scattering. Electrochem Commun 2012;25:748.
[10] Hao QZ, Wang B, Bossard JA, Kiraly B, Zeng Y, Chiang IK, et al.
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering study on graphenecoated metallic nanostructure substrates. J Phys Chem C
2012;116:724954.
[11] Hummers WS, Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J
Am Chem Soc 1958;80:1339.
CARBON
7 0 (2 0 1 4) 2 1 522 3
[12] Wang RC, Lin HY, Chen SJ, Lai YF, Huang MRS. Boundary
layer-assisted chemical bath deposition of well-aligned ZnO
rods on Si by a one-step method. Appl Phys A 2009;96:77581.
[13] Mahaling RN, Jana GK, Das CK, Jeong H, Ha CS. Carboxylated
nitrile elastomer/filler nanocomposite: effect of silica
nanofiller in thermal, dynamic mechanical behavior, and
interfacial adhesion. Macromol Res 2005;13:30613.
[14] Acik M, Lee G, Mattevi C, Pirkle A, Wallace RM, Chhowalla M,
et al. The role of oxygen during thermal reduction of
graphene oxide studied by infrared absorption spectroscopy.
J Phys Chem C 2011;115:1976181.
[15] Acik M, Lee G, Mattevi C, Chhowalla M, Cho K, Chabal YJ.
Unusual infrared-adsorption mechanism in thermal reduced
graphene oxide. Nat Mater 2010;9:8405.
[16] Shin KS, Lee HS, Joo SW, Kim K. Surface-induced
photoreduction of 4-nitrobenzenethiol on Cu revealed by
surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy. J Phys
Chem C 2007;111:152237.
[17] Yan B, Thubagere A, Premasiri WR, Ziegler LD, Negro LD,
Reinhard BM. Engineered SERS substrates with multiscale
signal enhancement: nanoparticle cluster arrays. ACS Nano
2009;3:1190202.
223
[18] Otto A. The chemical (electronic) contribution to surfaceenhanced Raman scattering. J Raman Spectrosc
2005;36:497507.
[19] Jensen L, Aikens CM, Schatz GC. Electronic structure
methods for studying surface-enhanced Raman scattering.
Chem Soc Rev 2008;37:106173.
[20] Yu XX, Cai HB, Zhang WH, Li XJ, Pan N, Luo Y, et al. Tuning
chemical enhancement of SERS by controlling the chemical
reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets. ACS Nano
2011;5:9528.
[21] Kim NH, Kim K. Surface-enhanced resonance Raman
scattering of rhodamine 6G on Pt nanoaggregates. J Raman
Spectrosc 2005;36:6238.
[22] Wang RC, Lin HY. Efficient surface enhanced Raman
scattering from Cu2O porous nanowires transformed from
CuO nanowires by plasma treatments. Mater Chem Phys
2012;136:6615.
[23] Xie LM, Ling X, Fang Y, Zhang J, Liu ZF. Graphene as a
substrate to suppress fluorescence in resonance Raman
spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2009;131:98901.