Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Editors-in-Chief
George Pliakas 06
Christopher Choi 06
Design and Layout
Petar Hinic 06
Editors
Ashi Adamjee 06
Caroline Hocking 06
Tiffany Huang 06
Eleni Michailidis 06
Lavanya Venkateswaran 06
Rishi Verma 06
Assistant Editors
Nicolas Beabeau 07
Sung Cho 07
Evan Christensen 07
Keith Da Silva 07
Sylvia Lin 07
Jae Oh 07
Michael Perrino 07
Mussaad Razouki 07
Faculty Advisor
Letty Moss-Salentijn, DDS, PhD
Faculty Reviewers
Thomas Cangialosi, DDS
Heera Chang, DDS, MD
Steven Chussid, DDS
Martin Davis, DDS
Sidney Eisig, DDS
John Grbic, DMD
Kunal Lal, DDS
Evanthia Lalla, DDS
Louis Mandel, DDS
Tracey Rosenberg, DDS, MD
Letty Moss-Salentijn, DDS, PhD
Margherita Santoro, DDS
George White, DDS
Angela Yoon, DDS
Michael Yuan, DDS
EDITORS NOTE
The Columbia Dental Review has
served as a voice for students of
the College of Dental Medicine who
have delved into clinical research,
in collaboration with faculty, to explore the signicance of individual
cases within dentistrys various
elds.
Celebrating our tenth volume, we
hope to have continued this long
tradition in a manner worthy of our
predecessors. We were fortunate
to be guided in the inception of this
volume by Andrea Smith 05. Her
devotion to the ninth volume was
integral to its success as recipient
of the Meskin Journalism Award for
excellence in Dental Student Publications.
We extend special thanks to Dr.
Letty Moss-Salentijn and Petar Hinic, whose tireless efforts are representative of the best which CDM
has to offer. Dr. Salentijns guidance
for the CDR has kept this student
publication alive and well, creating
a smooth transition as the torch is
handed down from one class to the
next. Petar Hinics talent and skills
in computer design, as well as dedication, exude from every page of
this volume. We were humbled by
his transformation of the individual
articles into one cohesive collection
unied by his touch.
Finally, we would like to thank the
authors, faculty reviewers, and assistant editors. Certainly, this tenth
volume of the CDR would not have
been possible without their contributions.
CDR
Keith Da Silva
Sidney Eisig, DDS
David Webb
Stephen Petty
Rick Tsay, DMD, MD
Vincent Carrao, DDS, MD
David Koslovsky
Howard Israel, DDS
Stephanie Drew, DMD
Tara Plansky, DMD
C.J. Langevin, DMD, MD
Laike Stewart, DVM
David Behrman, DMD
15 Paul Li
19 Candice Zemnick, DMD, MPH Jigs, Guides, Indices, Matrices and Templates in Implant
Dentistry: Prosthodontic Case Control in Implant Dentistry
25 Mussaad Razouki
CASE REPORT
Keith Da Silva1
Sidney Eisig, DDS2
1
Class of 2007, College of Dental Medicine,
Columbia University, New York, NY
2
George Guttmann Professor of Clinical Craniofacial Surgery; Division Director, Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery; Chief, Hospital Dental
Service, New York Presbyterian Hospital,
Columbia University, New York, NY
CDR
A 32 year old woman reported to the department of in the fourth decade2, 4,12. There is some statistical evioral surgery with a lingual swelling in the region of the dence to suggest that ameloblastomas are more comsecond and third mandibular molars on the left side mon in African populations when compared to Cauca(Fig. 1). A panoramic radiograph of the region revealed sians13-14, and there is a predilection for this lesion to
a well circumscribed multilocular radiolucency below occur in males2,4,12. Approximately 80% of ameloblastomas occur in the mandible
the second and third moand are often associated
lar extending beyond the
with unerupted teeth10,15-17.
inferior border of mandiThe remaining 20% occur
ble (Fig. 2). A computed
in the maxilla and are most
tomography (CT) scan
commonly associated with
conrmed the lesion as a
the maxillary tuberosity6.
soft tissue expansion into
Four clinical types of amthe oor of the mouth
eloblastoma have been de(Fig. 3). Aspiration of the
scribed: unicystic amelolesion revealed a viscous,
blastoma, solid multicystic
mucous-like
material.
ameloblastoma, peripheral
A biopsy was then perameloblastoma, and maformed and microscopic
lignant
ameloblastoma.
examination conrmed
The unicystic ameloblasthe diagnosis of multitoma resembles a typical
cystic
ameloblastoma
cystic lesion with either an
(Fig. 4). After extraction
intraluminal or intramural
of the second and third
molars, the patient was Fig. 1. Intraoral photograph depicting a lingual swelling proliferation of the cystic
lining. Diagnosis is based
taken to the operating in the posterior region of the mandible (black arrow)
on the radiological nding
room for radical surgical resection of the ameloblastoma along with 1.5 cm of a well-circumscribed unilocular lesion as well as hisof adjacent healthy bone (Fig. 5). The mandible was tological evidence of an ameloblastoma18. Microscopithen rebuilt with a reconstruction plate (Fig. 6), and cally, unicystic ameloblastomas consist of cystic lesions
the patient was brought to the recovery room in stable in which one or more of the following are present: (1)
a basal cell layer containing columnar cells resembling
condition.
ameloblasts, (2) hyperchromatic nuclei having vacuoDISCUSSION
lated atypical cytoplasm polarized from the basal lamina and (3) a loose stellate reticulum-like epithelium
Ameloblastomas can occur over a wide age range. lining the basilar ameloblast-like cells19-20. Unicystic
However, the average age at the time of diagnosis falls ameloblastomas are clinically less aggressive than the
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Fig. 2. Radiograph illustrating a well circumscribed multilocular radiolucency. The lesion appears below the
second and third molar on the left side and borders are
indicated with white arrows
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
CDR
David Webb1
Stephen Petty2
Rick Tsay, DMD, MD3
Vincent Carrao, DDS, MD4
Both primary and secondary bone healing are dependent on the formation of bone from osteoblasts. Several growth factors involved in the process necessary
to produce the osteoblastic phenotype are outlined in
Fig 1.
LITERATURE REVIEW
There are 19 cases of reported spontaneous bone
regeneration in critical-size segmental defects of the
mandible in the English literature for the last 53 years.1
Signicant to this case report is that of these 19 cases,
only 3 occur in adult patients.
CASE REPORT
Mr. C.J. is a 39-year-old otherwise healthy male who
presented to an oral surgeon with a complaint of right
facial swelling and pain. A panoramic radiograph revealed a 4.0 cm round radiolucency associated with
erupted teeth #31 and 32 (Fig. 2). The initial treat-
ment plan called for surgical extraction along with si- DISCUSSION
multaneous biopsy of the radiolucent lesion.
An unfortunate complication of the procedure was the Chalmers et al2 suggested in 1975 that three requirepatients mandible was fractured as teeth #31 and 32 ments must be met if bone formation is to occur.
were extracted. As a result of the fracture the patient These requirements are 1) an inducing agent must be
was placed in maxillomandibular xation (MMF) and present, 2) there must be osteogenic precursor cells
superior border wire was placed.
present, and 3) the environment must be hospitable to
After histopathology conrmed the radiolucent cystic osteogenesis. A few noteworthy proposals explaining
lesion to be an ameloblastoma a denitive treatment spontaneous mandibular osteogenesis which satisfy
plan was established, consisting of En Bloc resection varying aspects of these three landmark requirements
with 1 cm peripheral margins. Interim stabilization include the development of bone from intact and fragwould be attained with a reconstruction plate followed mented periosteum, infection, and articial stabilizaby insertion of a posterior iliac crest bone graft eight to tion.
nine months post resection. Endosteal implants were Explaining the molecular biology of fracture healing,
planned six months after interim stabilization.
Einhorn3 reports that, the presence of committed and
On the day of the surgical resection, the patients oc- uncommitted undifferentiated mesenchymal cells in
clusion and the stability of the bony segments were the periosteum contributes to the process of fracture
assessed and deemed satisfactory prior to removing healing by recapitulation of the embryonic intramemthe MMF. The patient received two grams of Ampicillin branous and endochondral bone formation. Kisner4
and 125mg of Solu-medrol. Full thickness mucoperi- further adds that a fragmented periosteum and the
osteal aps were elevated both buccally and lingually. remaining mandible may both serve as the source of
A Lorenz 2.7 reconstruction plate was pre-bent and regenerated bone.
screw holes were pre-drilled prior to
resection. En Bloc segmental resection from the distal surface of tooth
#27 to the angle was performed
using both reciprocating and oscillating saws. The mandibular pathologic specimen measured 6.0 x 3.0
x 1.7 cm with no tumor on resection
margins. MMF was then reapplied
and the reconstruction plate was
secured to the distal and proximal
segments. At this time MMF was
released and proper occlusion was
conrmed. The operation concluded with primary closure of periosteal and mucosal layers (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Post-operative radiograph
The post-operative course was
uneventful- the patient was discharged on post-op day two and PO
antibiotics were administered for
one week. The occlusion was stabilized with light elastic bands for the
entire post op period.
An eight month post-resection panoramic radiograph taken in preparation for the autogenous bone graft
revealed a regenerated mandible
(Fig. 4). This radiographic appearance of a spontaneously regenerated mandible was conrmed clinically during the extraoral mandibular reconstruction (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4. Eight month post-resection radiograph revealing a regenerated mandible (blue arrows)
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Although infection is suspected to have inhibitory effects on osteoblasts5, it is known that condensing osteitis, critically associated with an area of inammation, results in increased deposition of bone6. Elbeshir7
noted that periosteum will lay down new bone when
provoked by chronic infection. Although not a factor
in this case report, it is of statistical signicance that
almost one-third of all reported cases of spontaneous
mandibular regeneration involve infection.1
Articial stabilization promotes bone regeneration in
two ways. First, it precludes the collapse of soft tissue into the mandibular defect. Lemperle et al8 demonstrated that merely restricting soft tissue interposition served as sufcient impetus to allow for adequate
healing when an osteogenic periosteum was present.
Second, the articial stabilizer may act as scaffolding,
along or within which new bone may be formed- analogous to the developmental ossifying centers forming at a fork of a branching nerve. This scaffolding
phenomenon has been demonstrated in the ndings
of Boyne9, Whitmyer et al10, and Kisner4. Both of the
aforementioned attributes of articial stabilization may
be ascribed to the mandibular regeneration in this case
report secondary to an over-contoured reconstruction
plate (Fig. 6 and Fig. 7).
In conclusion, although spontaneous mandibular regeneration is a rare phenomenon, potential stimuli,
such as intact and fragmented periosteum, infection,
and articial stabilization, may initiate mechanisms to
bring about the event.
57(1):36-45
3. Einhorn TA (1998) The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Ortho (355S):S7-S21
4. Kisner WH (1980) Spontaneous posttraumatic mandibular
regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(3):442-7
5. Azuma H, Kido J, Ikedo D, Kataoka M, Nagata T (2004)
Substance P enhances the inhibition of osteoblastic cell
differentiation induced by lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontol 75(7):974-81
6. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE (2001) Oral
and Maxillofacial Pathology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, W.B.
Saunders Co.
7. Elbershir EI (1990) Spontaneous regeneration of the mandibular bone following hemimandibulectomy. Br J Oral
Maxillofac Surg 28(2):128-30. Review
8. Lemperle SM, Calhoun CJ, Curran RW, Holmes RE (1998)
Bony healing of large cranial and mandibular defects
protected from soft-tissue interposition: A comparative
study of spontaneous bone regeneration, osteoconduction, and cancellous autografting in dogs. Plast Reconstr
Surg 101(3):660-72
9. Boyne PJ (1983) The restoration of resected mandibles in
children without the use of bone grafts. Head Neck Surg
6(2):626-631
10. Whitmyer CC, Esposito SJ, Smith JD, Zins JE (1996) Spontaneous regeneration of a resected mandible in a preadolescent: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 75(4):356-9
REFERENCES
1. de Villa GH, Chen CT, Chen YR (2003) Spontaneous bone
regeneration of the mandible in an elderly patient: a case
report and review of the literature. Chang Gung Med J
26(5):363-9. Review
2. Chalmers J, Gray DH, Rush J (1975) Observations on the
induction of bone in soft tissues. J Bone Joint Sur Br
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
David Koslovsky1
Howard Israel, DDS2
Stephanie Drew, DMD3
Tara Plansky, DMD2
C.J. Langevin, DMD, MD2
Laike Stewart, DVM2
David Behrman, DMD2
Class of 2006, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Weill
Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New
York, NY
3
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Long
Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY
1
CDR
CURRENT TECHNIQUES FOR TMJ RECONSTRUCTION
Techniques for reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint in human patients with severe degenerative joint disease have been unsuccessful. In the
1980s, many of these patients had implant placement
with proplast-teon and silastic. Trumpy and Lyberg
have shown that most of these patients developed
temporomandibular joints with osteoarthritis, brosis
and further limitation of mandibular function.3 Furthermore, there are many other indications for total
temporomandibular joint reconstruction, particularly in
patients with neoplasia, infection and trauma.4 Surgical techniques for autogenous temporomandibular
joint reconstruction include costochondral grafts, iliac
grafts, microvascular free aps (clavicle, bula), and
cadaveric mandible cribs with autogenous cortico-cancellous bone. These techniques have been used with
variable success with the major disadvantage of requiring a second surgical site. Sliding posterior mandibular
ramus osteotomies have been used, but still require
additional bone grafting.5,6 Although there are anecdotal reports of the use of distraction osteogenesis for
human temporomandibular reconstruction; there is a
paucity of literature on this subject.
BENEFITS OF DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS
Tissue engineering techniques are being developed for
the reconstruction and replacement of diseased human
tissues. A recent investigation has demonstrated production of a minipig mandibular condyle using in vitro
tissue engineering techniques.7 Distraction osteogenesis has potential to provide autogenous reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint, using an in vivo
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Reconstruction of the Temporomandibular Joint with Distraction Osteogenesis in the Minipig Animal Model
Fig. 1A
Fig. 2
Fig. 1B
Fig. 1. Injection of Sclerosing Solution. Fig. 1A. The joint space is palpated. Fig. 1B. 5 cc of 3% Sotradecol (Sodium
Tetradecyl Sulfate 3%) or 23.4% Sodium Chloride is injected into the superior joint space of the left temporomandibular joints to induce osteoarthritic changes
Fig. 2. Accessing the TMJ. A preauricular incision is used and dissection to the temporomandibular joint proceeds
through the following layers: skin, subcutaneous tissue, parotidomasseteric fascia, supercial temporal fascia and
joint capsule
OBJECTIVE
10
METHODS
The minipigs were anesthetized and monitored according to standard procedures.19,21 Following satisfactory
induction of orotracheal general anesthesia, the left
temporomandibular joint was prepped with betadine.
5 cc of the sclerosing agent 3% Sotradecol (Sodium
Tetradecyl Sulfate 3%) or 23.4% Sodium Chloride was
injected into the superior joint space of the left temporomandibular joints to induce osteoarthritic changes
(Fig. 1A,B).22
Six weeks following the sclerosing procedure, the animals were anesthetized for the surgical placement of
the distraction devices. During the dissection through
a retromandibular incision, a nerve stimulator was used
to identify the mandibular branch of the facial nerve.
All blood vessels were appropriately tied with 3-0 Vicryl
sutures or cauterized, to achieve hemostasis. A periosteal elevator was used to provide access to the ramus
of the mandible to the level of the mandibular condyle.
Following this, an incision was created through the supercial temporal fascia, 45 degrees to the zygomatic
arch, and the capsule of the joint was removed permitting access to the entire joint (Fig. 2). An osteotomy
was created through the neck of the condyle and the
condylectomy was performed (Fig. 3A-D). The disc
and all brotic tissues of the temporomandibular joint
were removed creating a gap between the glenoid
fossa and remaining mandible of 15 20 mm. The
condyle and disk tissues, which were removed, were
submitted for histologic examination (hematoxylin &
eosin staining).
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Reconstruction of the Temporomandibular Joint with Distraction Osteogenesis in the Minipig Animal Model
Fig. 3A
Fig. 3B
Fig. 3C
Fig. 3D
Fig. 3. Contents of TMJ. Fig. 3A. Condyle, in 2 segments. Fig. 3B. Articular cartilage. Fig. 3C. Cartilagenous Disc.
Fig. 3D. Condyle, articular cartilage, cartilaginous disc in proper orientation
The mandibular distraction osteogenesis device used in through a small window created in the skin above the
this experiment is produced by KLS Martin, L.P. and has retromandibular incision (Fig. 7A,B). This permitted
the following description: (Stock #02-515-40) Zurich access to activating the device while posing the least
Distractor, 2 Four-Hole Cloverleaf Plates, 20 MM, Left, amount of interference to the animals regular moveEnd Driven, Extended Arm (Fig. 4). Prior to insertion, ments.
the device was sterilized in a steam autoclave. Through Postoperatively, the animals were monitored appropria retromandibular incision, an L-shaped osteotomy was ately and left only once they could maintain sternal
recumbency and were oxygenating
created from the sigmoid notch vertically and inferiorly, and then horiwell.21 During the rst 24 hours,
zontally and posteriorly, to create a
vitals were measured every hour,
mandibular bone transport segment
while vitals were measured every 4
(Fig. 5). The distractor transports
hours during the second 24 hours.
the segment of bone from the manThereafter, the wound was inspectdibular ramus to eventually dock in
ed and the vital signs measured four
the glenoid fossa to form a new contimes daily.
dyle for the reconstructed temporo- Fig. 4. Distraction Device. The The distraction device was not acmandibular joint. The distraction distractor used in this procedure tivated for a six day latency period
features: 2 Four-Hole Cloverleaf
device was secured with 2.0 mm tifollowing its placement. The dePlates, 20 MM, Left, End Driven, Extanium screws inferior and superior tended Arm. Supplied by KLS Mar- vice was activated 1 mm/day, from
to the osteotomy site, stabilizing the tin, LP - Stock #02-515-40
postoperative days 7 to 27, until
transport segment to the remaining
the transport segment had docked
native mandible (Fig. 6A,B). All wounds were irrigated into the glenoid fossa (Fig. 8). The device was left
and then closed in layers, using 3-0 and 4-0 Vicryl su- in place for an additional 40 days allowing the bone
tures. Intradermal sutures were used to permit skin to heal at the previous osteotomy sites of the ramus
closure. The turning screw of the distraction device of the mandible. The distraction device was removed
was either secured within the original incision or placed 67 days postoperatively while the pig continued a nor-
Fig. 5
Fig. 6A
Fig. 6B
Fig. 5. L-Shaped Osteotomy. Through a retromandibular incision, an L-shaped osteotomy is created below the neck
of the condyle in the posterior mandibular ramus to create a bone transport segment
Fig. 6. Securing the Distraction Device. Fig. 6A. Secured distraction device in closed orientation. Fig. 6B. Secured
distraction device in open orientation
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
11
Reconstruction of the Temporomandibular Joint with Distraction Osteogenesis in the Minipig Animal Model
Fig. 7A
Fig. 7B
Fig. 8
Fig. 7. Extended Arm of Distraction Device. Fig. 7A. The turning screw of the distraction device is either secured
within the original incision or Fig. 7B. placed through a small window created in the skin above the retromandibular
incision
Fig. 8. Activation of the Distraction Device
Fig. 9A
Fig. 9B
Fig. 9C
RESULTS
Fig. 9D
12
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Reconstruction of the Temporomandibular Joint with Distraction Osteogenesis in the Minipig Animal Model
Fig. 10A
Fig. 11A
Fig. 10B
Fig. 10C
Fig. 11B
Fig. 11C
Fig. 11D
CONCLUSION
A functional temporomandibular joint was formed in
the minipig model, with the creation of a joint space,
brous tissue surfaces and synovial tissues.
Day 0
30 Weeks
28.5
40.4
28.0
33.6
26.0
50.0
Table 1. Weight (kg) changes of all three minipigs following the experiment
Fig. 12. Histomorphology Image (H&E stain) of Transport Gap of Left (Experimental) TMJ Minipig #1.
Fig. 13. Sagittal Section and Histomorphology Images (H&E stain) of Left (Experimental) TMJ Minipig #2. Fig. 13A. Gross section of experimental joint
along with Fig. 13B. low power and Fig. 13C. high power views (1. Fibrous connective tissue, 2. Joint space, 3. Fibrocartilage, 4. Condylar subchondral bone)
and Fig. 13D. Inamed synovial membrane can also be seen
Fig. 12
Fig. 13A
Fig. 10. Sagittal Section and Histomorphology Images (H&E stain) of Right (Control) TMJ Minipig #1.
Fig. 10A. Gross section of control joint along with
Fig 10B. low power and Fig. 10C. high power views
(1. Fibrocartilage (disc), 2. Joint space, 3. Fibrocartilage, 4. Condylar subchondral bone)
Fig. 11. Sagittal Section and Histomorphology Images (H&E stain) of Left (Experimental) TMJMinipig #1. Fig. 11A. Gross section of experimental joint.
Fig. 11B. Low power view along with Fig. 11C. high
power view of anterior (1. Fibrous connective tissue, 2. Joint space, 3. Synovium, 4. Fibrocartilage,
5. Condylar subchondral bone) and Fig. 11D. middle
joint segments
Fig. 13B
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Fig. 13C
Fig. 13D
13
Reconstruction of the Temporomandibular Joint with Distraction Osteogenesis in the Minipig Animal Model
DISCUSSION
The controlled movement of the distraction osteogenesis technique allowed for a large mass of bone to be
formed in the experimental joint. The shape and size
of the neo-condyle had taken on its usual spherical
shape because the animals were allowed to function
normally. The brous tissue layer over the condyle
and temporal bone is believed to be brocartilage. The
dense band of brous tissue amid the reformed joint
space resembles a disc; however no claim can be made
at this time that a reformation of the disc actually occurred. Furthermore, it is difcult in interpreting the
presence of synovial membrane - Did the tissue form
during the recreation of the joint or was there simply
incomplete tissue resection during the original surgery?
An important nding is that minipig #2 formed functional joint tissues despite recurrent infection. In fact,
normal masticatory function was achieved in all of the
animals permitting weight gain and normal growth.
Good animal studies that are transferable to the human temporomandibular joint are lacking, and this is
a major factor that has resulted in multiple failures in
the reconstruction of the human temporomandibular
joint. Although there are several animal studies involving the effects of distraction osteogenesis on the tissues of the temporomandibular joint, none of these
studies actually involved the use of this technique for
reconstruction of a diseased temporomandibular joint.
Therefore, it is necessary to perform appropriate animal studies which have demonstrated successful temporomandibular joint reconstruction, before applying
any of these techniques to human patients with severe
temporomandibular joint disease.
This pilot study demonstrates that reconstruction of
the temporomandibular joint using a distraction osteogenesis technique is feasible. It is anticipated that
further studies using the minipig model are likely to
result in a new and improved technique of autogenous
reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using
distraction osteogenesis. Additional human clinical trials using distraction osteogenesis for temporomandibular joint reconstruction are required and will offer the
potential for restoring mandibular function in patients
with severe temporomandibular joint disease.
REFERENCES
1. Lipton JA, Ship JA, Larach-Robinson D (1993) Estimated Prevalance and Distribution of Reported Orofacial Pain in the
United States. J Am Dent Assoc 124(10):115-21
2. March LM, Cross, MJ, Lapsley H, Branbic AJM, Tribe KL, Bachmeier CJM, Courtenay BJ, and Brooks PM (1999) Outcomes
after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis.
The Medical Journal of Australia 171: 231-8
3. Trumpy IG, Roald B, Lyberg T (1996) Morphologic and immunohistochemical observation of explanted Proplast-Tef-
14
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Vascular anomalies are some of the most common congenital abnormalities, but
they are nonetheless challenging to accurately diagnose and manage. Early diagnostic methods were often based on a description and correlation to items that were
encountered in everyday life. In the mid-nineteenth century, Virchow proposed a
histopathologic classication based on the size and appearance of the constituent
vessels.1 This system categorized vascular lesions as angioma complex, angioma
cavernosum, or angioma racemosum and was later extended to lymphatic lesions
by Wegner.2 Classications that followed attempted to correlate clinical observations
with pathologic and embryologic ndings. A well accepted biologic classication by
Mulliken and Glowacki divided vascular anomalies into two major types, tumors (hemangiomas) and malformations, based on clinical and histologic ndings.3
Paul Li1
Tracey Rosenberg, DDS, MD2
CDR
INTRODUCTION
Hemangiomas are tumors composed of capillaries with
active proliferation potential. The proliferative phase is
characterized histologically by plump endothelial cells
with abundant mitotic activity, leading to an increase in
the number of mast cells and multilaminated basement
membranes. These tumors are usually seen soon after
birth, grow rapidly, and involute over the years. Involution is characterized by a decrease in cellularity and
tumor size, formation of larger vascular vessels, brofatty replacement, and development of a lobular architecture with septae. Initial physical ndings of involution include a decrease in turgidity and fading of color
to a dullish or gray shade. Hemangiomas are common
in Caucasians, being evident in up to 12% of all children
and occurring three times more frequently in females.4
According to Mulliken, hemangiomas can be classied
into capillary, cavernous, and capillary-cavernous
types.2,4 Capillary hemangiomas (strawberry hemangiomas) are considered to be supercial and derived
from papillary dermal layer. Cavernous hemangiomas
are located within reticular dermis or subcutaneous tissue and may appear bluish or colorless based on its
location.
HEAD & NECK HEMANGIOMAS
Intraosseous vascular malformations account for less
than one percent of all bony tumor cases. The most
probable sites of malformation include the vertebral
column and the skull. Within the calvarium, the parietal bone is the most commonly involved followed by
the frontal bone. Within the facial skeleton, vascular
anomalies occur in the mandible, maxilla, and nasal
bones but are extremely rare in the zygoma.5 The
location of the bony lesion will dictate the signs and
symptoms presented by the patient. Patients will usu-
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
ally present with a history of gradually enlarging circumscribed swelling which may be tender but is rarely
painful.6
Orbital hemangiomas may obstruct the visual axis or
distort the cornea. The optic cortex is extremely sensitive to stimulus deprivation as demonstrated in both
kittens and baboons.7 If obstruction occurs during the
rst year of life, amblyopia may result in as little as one
week. The mass effect of a periorbital hemangioma,
particularly of the upper eyelid, may deform the developing cornea.1
Parotid gland hemangiomas may lead to obstruction
of the external auditory canal resulting in conductive
hearing loss and possibly affecting speech development in young children. Bilateral lesions which persist
beyond one year of age should be treated to prevent
this occurrence.2, 8, 10
Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (KMS) is a hemangioma
characterized by a rapidly growing vascular anomaly,
consumptive coagulopathy with thrombocytopenia,
prolonged PT, hypobrinoginemia, presence of D-dimers, and hemolytic anemia. However, KMS is not
caused by hemangiomas but by kaposiform hemangioendothelioma or tufted angioma.3
CASE REPORT
A 31-year-old Caucasian female was referred to the
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery clinic for extraction of a
carious, non-mobile number 16 associated with a left
facial-palatal vascular lesion. Past medical and dental
history included extraction of teeth numbers 1, 17, and
32, asthma, three C-sections, and a ruptured spleen
due to motor vehicle accident in 1992. The patient
was currently taking Advair (daily), Albuterol (prn),
and Micronor with no known drug allergies. On visual
15
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
17
18
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
CDR
RADIOGRAPHIC TEMPLATES
It all begins with proper placement and orientation of tention on tooth-borne templates, the abutment teeth
implants in order to optimize function and esthetics of can be relined with silicone6. The template should exthe denitive restoration1. Diagnosis of bone quality tend one to two teeth away from the edentulous area
and quantity can be made with the assistance of com- so as to afford stability. Once dislodged from the cast
puterized tomographic (CT) scans and ideal implant and edges smoothed, the pontic teeth on the temsites can be mapped2. Radiographic templates can be plate should be lled with a radiopaque resin (read befabricated for the patient to wear during their CT scan low) so as to be visible on the CT scan and reect their
so as to correlate
intended position
surgical and reover the ridge.
storative treatment
For the completely
planning with raedentulous patient
diographic images3(Fig. 1B):
Pro5
. Tooth-borne and
vided the patient
Fig. 1A
tissue-borne temis wearing acplates are relatively
ceptable complete
easy to fabricate
denture prostheand are based on
ses, or a wax-up
diagnostic wax-ups
has been comFig. 1B
completed during Fig. 1C
pleted, these can
the treatment planbe replicated by
Fig. 1A. Radiographic template supported by anterior dentition. Fig. 1B. using a duplicating
ning stage.
For the partially Duplicate of complete denture serves as a radiographic template. Fig. ask. Alginate is
1C. Radiographic markers of gutta percha placed occlusally and axiedentulous patient
mixed and applied
ally
(Fig. 1A): Once the
to one half of the
complete wax-up is
ask and the dennished and factors such as occlusion, vertical dimen- ture can be placed, teeth-rst, until just the intaglio
sion, and esthetics are addressed, the cast can be now surface is visible. The land area of alginate surrounding
duplicated and converted into a working cast (Type the denture should be smoothed and not exceed the
III gypsum). A rigid thermo-forming sheet of .080 or perimeter of the ask so that it may be closed comabove can then be vacu-formed over the cast and sub- pletely without interference. Once the alginate has set,
sequently removed using a hand-piece with preferred additional alginate may be placed in the other half of
bur or disc. The clinician should cut back to the height the ask, and manually applied to the inner-surface of
of contour in the region of the abutment teeth which the denture (thus avoiding the incorporation of air bubwill support the template so that it will snugly t but bles). The ask is then closed slowly and excess alginot lock on to the patients teeth. However, the entire nate is allowed to escape. Once the second increment
outline of the teeth which are in the edentulous area of alginate has set, the ask can be opened, and the
should be preserved. Distal extension anges should be duplicate denture is removed. A radiopaque mixture of
retained and relined for stability if necessary as long as autopolymerizing acrylic is then applied by syringe to
there is no interference with ap design. For added re- the tooth areas of the mold. Pre-mixed barium sulfate
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
19
Fig. 2A
Fig. 2B
Fig. 2C
Fig. 2D
acrylics are available, however an economical alternative is to purchase barium sulfate from a pharmacy (no
prescription necessary), and mix it with traditional clear
autopolymerizing resin so that it accounts for about
10-15% of the mixture by weight, i.e., 85g resin/15g
BaSO44,7,8. Once the tooth areas are lled, additional
clear autopolymerizing acrylic is now applied on top
so that upon closure there will be excess escaping the
ask. The ask can then be placed in warm water in a
pressure-pot at 20 psi for about 15-20 minutes. Once
polymerized, the duplicated denture can be removed
and the surfaces checked for areas that may irritate
the patient. Occlusion of template should be veried to
ensure stability of the prosthesis during the CT scan.
The patient should be instructed to only take the CT
scan while wearing this template. An inter-occlusal record with a minimum of 4-6mm inter-occlusal space
needs to be worn to avoid scatter if opposing dentition
has metallic restorations.
Other radiographic markers can be used such as gutta
percha (Fig. 1C) or metal wires which can be placed
along the facial/buccal axial surfaces or in channels
placed occlusally within the connes of the intended
prosthetic restoration.
SURGICAL TEMPLATES (FIG. 2A-D)
Once the CT is completed, it can be analyzed by both
the surgical and restorative clinicians and optimal locations for implants can be visualized as facilitated by
the radiographic markers and the topography of bone.
Surgical templates or implant placement guides are
rigid stable devices that facilitate the precise position
and angulations of implants to optimize the design of
the intended nal prosthesis while respecting anatomical limitations6,7,9. Radiographic templates can be easily
converted into surgical templates by drilling holes in
20
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Fig. 3A
Fig. 3C
Fig. 3B
Fig. 3A. Dental oss used as scaffolding for jig. Fig. 3B. Light Activated urethane acrylate gel applied. Fig. 3C. Facial
view of jig
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Fig. 4A
Fig. 4B
Fig. 4C
Fig. 4F
Fig. 4D
Fig. 4E
21
Fig. 5A
Fig. 5C
Fig. 5B
Fig. 5A. Angulated abutments placed on cast in ideal formation. Guidepins are attached which project orientation.
Silicone Putty is pressed up against guides. Fig. 5B. Intra-oral use of vinyl index. Fig. 5C. Lateral view of index
6A & B). If the patient is wearing a xed full-arch interim prosthesis, then the process is quite easy as it
can be removed from the patients mouth and screwed
onto the implant-level cast. A vinyl index as described
before can then be fabricated and guidepins placed.
Straight, angulated or custom abutments can now be
easily be selected so as to optimally support the nal
restoration24.
ABUTMENT TRANSFER JIG: VINYL MATRICES
(FIG. 5A-C)
Multi-unit angulated abutments often possess 12 different positions of orientation. Difculties can arise when
attempting to place several abutments at one time to
accommodate metal framework superstructures. In order to facilitate intraoral placement, an acrylic or vinyl
index can be fabricated and the orientation of each
abutment is easily established. In full-arch cases, a
implant-level immediate load prosthesis precludes the
permanent placement of angulated abutments until nal delivery. Therefore, for every framework and waxup verication procedure, this index provides an effective and time-saving method of accurate multi-unit or
custom abutment transfer from the cast to the mouth.
Once the abutments have been selected, they should
be placed on the cast in the ideal orientation. Guidepins are then placed so that the angulated relationship is projected upward and will be impressed by the
silicone material. Sufcient material should also extend
onto adjacent teeth, or in an edentulous case, into the
lingual vestibule/palatal vault area for stability. Abutments can be placed in the patients mouth and their
position veried by attaching the guidepins and seeing
if they passively t into the index.
Fig. 6A. Guidepins placed and angulated abutments are selected. Fig. 6B.
Anterior-Posterior Spread, Cantilever
design and Framework planning are
developed based on matrix
Fig. 6A
22
Fig. 6B
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Fig. 7A. Acrylic teeth luted to vinyl index and framework design
veried. Fig. 7B. Screw Access
holes blocked with guidepins and
hot wax subsequently added
Fig. 7A
Fig. 7B
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author wishes to acknowledge the contributions of
Drs. White, Alfonso, Lal, and Piro for their clinical and
laboratory instruction.
REFERENCES
1. Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P (1988) Optimum
placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent
59(4):467-73
2. Besimo C, Lambrecht JT, Nidecker A (1995) Dental implant
treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 24(4):264-7
3. Basten CH (1995) The use of radiopaque templates
for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int
26(9):609-12
4. Basten CH, Kois JC (1996) The use of barium sulfate for
implant templates. J Prosthet Dent 76(4):451-4
5. Takeshita F, Suetsugu T (1996) Accurate presurgical determination for implant placement by using computerized
tomography scan. J Prosthet Dent 76(6):590-1
6. Kuzmanovic DV, Waddell JN (2005) Fabrication of a self-retaining surgical template for surgical placement of dental
implants for the partially edentulous patient. J Prosthet
Dent 93(1):95-6
7. Misch CM (1999) Use of a surgical template for autologous
bone grafting of alveolar defects. J Prosthodont 8(1):4752
8. Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P, Sory C (1992) Bariumcoated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 12(1):52-61
9. Sicilia A, Enrile FJ, Buitrago P, Zubizarreta J (2000) Evaluation of the precision obtained with a xed surgical template in the placement of implants for rehabilitation of
the completely edentulous maxilla: a clinical report. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(2):272-7
10. Walker M, Hansen P (1999) Dual-purpose, radiographicsurgical implant template: fabrication technique. Gen
Dent 47(2):206-8
11. Cehreli MC, Sahin S (2000) Fabrication of a dual-purpose surgical template for correct labiopalatal positioning of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
15(2):278-82
12. Solow RA (2001) Simplied radiographic-surgical template for placement of multiple, parallel implants. J Prosthet Dent 85(1):26-9
13. Sykaras N, Woody RD (2001) Conversion of an implant
radiographic template into a surgical template. J Prostho-
23
dont 10(2):108-12
14. Sukotjo C, Radics A (2004) Use of vinyl polysiloxane for
the fabrication of implant surgical guide. J Prosthet Dent
92(6):596-597
15. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lormee J, Coudert JL (2000)
Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical
guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. J
Oral Implantol 26(4):300-3
16. Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS (2003) Predictable implant
placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 89(6):6115
17. Cehreli MC, Calis AC, Sahin S (2002) A dual-purpose
guide for optimum placement of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 88(6):640-3
18. van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Brajnovic I,
Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P (2002) A custom template and denitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants 17(5):663-70
19. McCartney JW, Pearson R (1994) Segmental framework
matrix: master cast verication, corrected cast guide,
and analog transfer template for implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 71:197-200
20. Jacobson Z, Peterson T, Kim ED (1996) Positioning jig for
implant abutments:procedures and clinical applications. J
Prosthet Dent 75:435-9
21. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A (1996) Accuracy of implant
impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
11(2):216-22
22. Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A (1999) Accuracy of
implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(6):885-8
23. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G (2004) An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 92(5):470-6
24. Chaimattayompol N, Stanescu J, Steinberg J, Vergo TJ
Jr. (2001) Use of a cross-mounting buccal index to help
transfer the spatial relationships of an interim prosthesis
to the denitive implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet
Dent 85(5):509-15
25. Wang R (1999) Preoperative auricular wax pattern duplication for surgical template fabrication. J Prosthet Dent
81(5):634-7
24
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Mussaad Razouki1
Louis Mandel, DDS2
CDR
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
25
Fig. 3. A CT scan of the parotid glands will show the presence of multilocular cysts usually bilateral
TREATMENT
Antiviral drug therapy is the most effective HIV treatment plan. There are currently 20 FDA approved retroviral drugs falling into ve different classes:
1.Nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors
(NsRTIs)
2.Nucleotide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors
(NtRTIs)
3.Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
(NNRTIs)
4.Protease Inhibitors (PIs)
5.Fusion (entry) inhibitors.
The diversity of the classes reects the fact that every
step in the HIV retroviral lifecycle is a potential target
for therapy. Indeed, it has been accepted that antiviral therapy is the most effective HIV treatment plan.
Treatment with multiple drug classes in a variety of
combinations is known as highly active antiretroviral
therapy (HAART)24-25.
The primary goal of HAART is to stop the impeding viral
replication. Simultaneously, some restoration of immunity is to be expected. HAART is indicated in patients
with HIV viral loads greater than 20,000 copies/mm3 or
CD4 cell counts below 500/ mm3. Therapy lowers the
viral load and elevates the level of CD4 cells26. HAART
has also succeeded in both eradicating parotid gland
swellings27-28 and their recurrences16.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
26
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
27
1
Class of 2004, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia
University, New York, NY
2
Class of 2005, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia
University, New York, NY
3
Assistant Professor, Director of Predoctoral Programs,
Division of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY
CDR
INTRODUCTION
Infants exhibit very little spatial movement, and therefore dental trauma is quite uncommon prior to age one.
At this age, the mineralizing crowns of the primary incisors have just erupted and are merely shells of the
outer enamel. The ameloblasts and odontoblasts occupying the somewhat large pulp chamber inside continue to deposit enamel and dentin matrix. The roots
have not yet developed and are seen radiographically
as an outline of a thin layer of cementum along the
Hertwigs epithelial root sheath (HERS). Traumatic coronal amputation or avulsion are rare in this age group;
an extensive literature search revealed only one case.
Yakushiji et al3 reported the case of a 3 year old child in
Japan in whom the roots of the lower primary incisors
had continued to form after these teeth had been fractured and severed. Despite the coronal amputation,
the intact cells of the pulp and periodontium continued
to produce dentin and cementum.
CASE REPORT
The following case report documents an extremely unusual instance of dental trauma and continued tooth
development in the absence of any remnant dental
hard tissue in an 11 month old boy. The mother and
child presented to the post-doctoral pediatric clinic at
the College of Dental Medicine as an emergency shortly
after the injury. The child had fallen from his bed and
had fractured his right primary maxillary central incisor
(tooth #E). A radiograph revealed a horizontal fracture
along the CEJ (VI Modied Ellis class IV fracture Fried
& Erickson) and a faint outline of the developing primary roots (Fig. 1). Clinically, the tooth exhibited extreme
coronal mobility at the fracture line and was extracted
due to concerns over aspiration while feeding. A second radiograph at this point revealed an edentulous
space at the extraction site with a barely visible outline
of the developing roots (Fig. 2). We decided not to
remove this extremely thin root layer due to the risk
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
of inadvertent injury to the underlying and fragile permanent tooth bud. The decision to monitor this case
was appropriate given the pre-cooperative age of the
child and the unusual nature of this case. The mother
received post-operative instructions and was asked to
return in two weeks or earlier if the child exhibited any
discomfort or difculty during feeding. The mother returned 5 months later and a subsequent radiograph revealed a developing tooth at the previously edentulous
extraction site (Fig. 3). It appeared that although the
post extraction radiograph had revealed the absence
of dental hard tissue, the pulp was relatively intact and
healthy and had continued to lay down tooth structure. Unfortunately, the remaining pulp in the extraction socket was exposed to the oral environment during this time and showed signs of inammation. We
extracted the pulp-tooth complex with great care (Fig.
4). The mother returned 2 months later and we took
one last radiograph to rule out any infection (or yet
another tooth). The extraction site was indeed clear
and had healed well.
DISCUSSION
As previously mentioned, dental injuries are infrequent
before the age of one. In this case, an 11 month old
boy suffered a fracture and subsequent coronal amputation of his upper right primary central incisor. The
intact pulpal tissues and continued tooth development
resulted in rudimentary root and some clinical crown
formation. While no formal histological examination
was performed, the probable histological observations
will be discussed. Here we would like to offer some
probable explanations to this phenomenon.
Following fracture to the tooth and subsequent removal of the remaining coronal tooth fragment, the outer
cellular layer of the root was left behind in the socket.
This included HERS and some of the pulp tissue. As
this dental pulp is highly vascular and well innervated, it
29
Continued tooth development following traumatic coronal amputation in an 11 month old boy
Fig. 1
Fig. 5
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 1. White arrow indicates a horizontal fracture along the CEJ of tooth # E. Fig. 2.
Immediately following extraction. Note the edentulous socket and the developing permanent tooth bud. Fig. 3. Phantom Tooth. Rudimentary tooth developing 5 months
post-extraction as a result of continued pulpal activity. Fig. 4. Clean edentulous socket
following extraction of the pulp-tooth complex. Fig. 5. Extracted pulp-tooth complex.
The black arrow indicates the brous pulp. The irregular dentine-cemento-enamel
complex lies to the left
30
Fig. 4
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
Continued tooth development following traumatic coronal amputation in an 11 month old boy
Volume 10 : 2005-2006
31
CDR
ABSTRACT
The abstract summarizes the principal points of the
case report and specic conclusions that may have
emerged in the discussion. It should be limited to less
than 250 words.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
A description of each authors degrees, titles, department, and afliation should be given.
INTRODUCTION
The introduction should provide a brief description of
the topic, as well as any relevant epidemiology and
current opinion as documented in the literature.
CASE REPORT
A description of the case(s), including pertinent photographs.
DISCUSSION
A thorough review of the literature, including other reported cases that are relevant to the case(s) presented
or reported.
CONCLUSION
Based on the present case(s) and the discussion.
REFERENCES
The authors should be listed in the order in which they
appear in the articles. In the case of multiple authors,
all authors names must be given.