Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 32, NO. 20, OCTOBER 15, 2014
I. INTRODUCTION
domains and back. Furthermore, microwave photonic technologies are compatible with frequency channelization to simultaneously allow wide instantaneous bandwidths and good receiver
sensitivity. Finally, microwave photonic links use optical fiber
to transport the signals around the platform, which reduces the
RF loss and significantly reduces the cable size and weight. As
an example, the weight of a representative low-loss militarygrade RF cable (113 kg/km [5]) is more than three times higher
than the weight of a comparable military-grade fiber-optic cable (31 kg/km [6]), while the loss of the RF cable (0.72 dB/m
at 18 GHz) is orders of magnitude more than fiber-optic cable (0.2 dB/km). While there are numerous components and
architectures that have been used to create microwave photonic
links, the three dominant components that enable the effective
use include:
1) Low-noise, high-power laser diodes.
2) Low-loss electrooptic modulators with low drive voltage,
and
3) High-power, highly-linear photodiodes.
Over the last ten years, the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA) has invested in numerous programs
aimed specifically at the improvement and maturation of these
three components. The Ultra-Wideband Multifunction Photonic
Transmit/Receive Module (ULTRA-T/R) and Photonic Simultaneous Transmit and Receive (P-STAR) programs aimed to
improve the electrooptic modulator as a means of achieving
good RF isolation between transmit and receive signals sharing
a common aperture at X-band. The Transmit and Receive Optimized Photonics (TROPHY) program focused on improving
lithium niobate modulators and high power photodiodes to increase the RF transmit power of microwave photonic links. The
Linear Photonic RF Front-End Technology (PHOR-FRONT)
program investigated the use of optical phase-locked loops as a
means of improving the linearity of microwave photonic links
and explored photonic downconversion. The Photonic Analog
Signal Processing Engines with Reconfigurability (PhASER)
program considered RF signal processing in the optical domain,
using reconfigurable optical filters and delay lines to improve the
SFDR of an RF photonic link. The Network Enabled by WDMHighly Integrated Photonics (NEW-HIP) program investigated
low-noise laser diodes and high-power photodetectors to create
a wavelength-division-multiplexed network capable of transmitting analog and digital signals on a common single-mode
fiber-optic network. While these programs measured various
performance metrics, a common metric was SFDR. This paper will summarize some of the results from these and other
DARPA-funded programs and describe how these performance
0733-8724 2014 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
3429
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3. Plot of measured laser relative intensity noise (RIN) versus optical
output power. Filled markers denote shot-noise-limited measurements and the
open markers denote estimates of the laser RIN, with the shot-noise removed.
The red X depicts the desired performance of a low-RIN laser.
(1)
where k is Boltzmanns constant, T is the apparent receiver temperature in Kelvins, and B is the bandwidth in Hertz. As the
bandwidth increases, the thermal noise will increase, causing
degradation in the receiver sensitivity. The red line in Fig. 1
shows an example of this relationship for a receiver with 5 dB
noise figure and 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio requirement. The dynamic range of a receiver is also impacted by the instantaneous
bandwidth. The SFDR of a receiver is often normalized to a
1 Hz bandwidth. For an instantaneous bandwidth, B, the SFDR
for a receiver can be calculated as:
2
SFDR (B) = SFDR (1Hz) 10log (B) .
3
(2)
3430
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 32, NO. 20, OCTOBER 15, 2014
Tf f P1 Rs
cos
2V (f )
(4)
Fig. 4.
reducing the effective dielectric constant of the RF signal. Methods of reducing the effective dielectric constant have included
reducing the thickness of the lithium niobate [15], increasing the
thickness of the microwave electrodes [14], and etching away
unneeded portions of the lithium niobate [16].
An innovative lithium niobate modulator developed under
ULTRA-T/R focused on achieving velocity matching between
the traveling wave RF signal and optical signal and maximizing the length over which this velocity matching occurred. The
novel design resulted in an interaction length between the RF
and optical signals of nearly 14 cm [17]. The dual-drive z-cut
design yielded one of the lowest measured V for a broadband
lithium niobate modulator: 1.4 V at 12 GHz. Fig. 4 summarizes
the measured V as a function of frequency [13]. The fiber-tofiber optical insertion loss (10 log(Tff )) was measured to be
8 dB [13]. While this low V modulator has a great deal of utility for microwave-photonic links, the focus of the ULTRA T/R
program was to allow simultaneous transmit and receive of microwave signals from a common antenna. Experiments carried
out under the ULTRA T/R program achieved 40 dB of isolation
between transmitted and received signals above 10 GHz [18].
The TROPHY program focused on improving the linearity
of microwave-photonic links as well as moving to higher operational frequencies. TROPHY included significant electrooptic
modulator development, and the focus was again on achieving velocity matching between the RF and optical signals. The
TROPHY program explored both thick electrodes and etching
of unneeded lithium niobate as a means of increasing the velocity of the microwave signal. As part of the TROPHY program, a
lithium niobate modulator was packaged with 1 mm coaxial connectors and demonstrated to have operational performance out
to 110 GHz. Fig. 5 shows the measured RF-optical frequency
response of the modulator. The fiber-to-fiber optical insertion
loss was measured to be 3 dB at a wavelength of 1550 nm [19].
On a DARPA-funded Small Business Innovation Research
program, velocity matching between the RF and optical signals
was achieved by transferring a very thin layer (110 m) of
lithium niobate onto a quartz substrate using crystal ion slicing [20]. The dc V of the device was shown to be 2.5 V at
1550 nm wavelength with a V L product of 4.75 Vcm [21].
3431
While these devices have not been packaged and fully characterized at high frequencies, preliminary results show preservation
of the electrooptic coefficient and low optical loss in the optical
waveguides formed in the thin films of lithium niobate. Furthermore, electromagnetic models show that the low dielectric
constant of the quartz substrate enables simultaneous velocity
matching and low RF loss out to millimeter-wave frequencies
[20].
In addition to lithium niobate modulators, DARPA has also
made significant investments in electrooptic modulators based
on alternative materials. While lithium niobate has a relatively
high electrooptic coefficient (r33 ) of 30.8 pm/V, novel materials engineering approaches have been investigated to produce
electrooptic polymers with potentially much higher r33 . The
DARPA Supermolecular Photonics Engineering (MORPH) program developed electrooptic polymers and investigated their
use in electrooptic modulators. Under this program, electrooptic polymers based on poly(methyl methacrylate)-anthrylmethyl
methacylate (PMMA-AMA) were synthesized and shown to
have r33 of over 300 pm/V. Additionally, MZMs were fabricated using these polymers, and dc V as low as 0.75 V was
demonstrated, while insertion losses of 17.1 dB were measured
[22]. Subsequent work with electrooptic polymer-based MZMs
has resulted in commercial products; as an example, an electrooptic polymer-based MZM with dc V of 2.5 V, insertion
loss of 6.5 dB, and speeds of up to 45 Gbit/s for differential
phase shift keying is commercially available [23].
Another materials system currently under development is the
GaAs/AlGaAs system. GaAs-based MZMs have been demonstrated in the past with V as low as 0.3 V in a pushpull configuration [24], but their overall performance is limited by the r33
of GaAs. Additionally, the small mode sizes of these devices result in increased coupling losses, which limits their utility in microwave photonic systems. Recently, DARPA has funded work
to increase the electrooptic efficiency of GaAs-based modulators through the use of InAlGaAs/InAlAs multi-quantum well
structures in the waveguide core [25]. These structures were
used to demonstrate MZMs with V of 2 V for single-arm-drive
and device length of 1.8 mm, resulting in a V L product of
0.36 Vcm. The device has potential for redesign in a pushpull
configuration to reduce V by a factor of two. The capacitance
of the devices was measured as 2 pF/cm, which is expected to
enable high-speed operation.
(5)
(6)
3432
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 32, NO. 20, OCTOBER 15, 2014
Fig. 8.
Fig. 7. Plot of saturation current versus frequency for high-power, high-speed
photodiodes. Based upon data compiled by J. Campbell and A. Beling [48].
where nin is the input noise (nin = kT B), nadd is the noise
added by the link, and gi is the intrinsic gain of the analog link.
For a MZI, gi is given by
!
"2
Tf f P1 Rs
gi =
rd2 .
(8)
2V
3433
Fig. 10.
Value
Laser Power, P 1
Laser RIN
Modulator transmission, T f f
V
Detector responsivity, r d
Modulator load resistance, R m
Detector load resistance, R l
Noise figure
Bandwidth
1W
170 dB/Hz
5 dB
1.7 V
0.9 A/W
50
50
10 dB
10 MHz
3434
Fig. 11.
[53].
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 32, NO. 20, OCTOBER 15, 2014
TROPHY team was able to demonstrate photonic downconversion at X-Band with an SFDR near 120 dB Hz2/3 [52].
E. Phase Modulation and Optical Phased-Locked Loops
The DARPA PHOR-FRONT program explored the use of
phase modulators and optical phase-locked loops (OPLL) as a
means of increasing the SFDR of a microwave-photonic link. A
phase modulator formed in lithium niobate is intrinsically linear
[53], [54]. PHOR-FRONT explored optical phase-locked loops
as linear demodulators. In one implementation of the PHORFRONT concept, an attenuation-counterpropagation (ACP) inloop phase modulator was used to modulate the phase of the
LO laser and a directional coupler to serve as a phase detector,
as shown schematically in Fig. 11. Two photodetectors monitor
the phase difference and provide a feedback signal to the ACP
in-loop modulator to essentially match the phase modulation
placed on the optical signal by the incoming RF signal [53].
Initial measurements of the SFDR of the microwave-photonic
link were carried out with a commercial-grade lithium niobate phase modulator (V = 1.95 V) as the transmitter phase
modulator and an ACP-OPLL. At a modulation frequency of
100 MHz, the link was shown to have an SFDR of 135 dB
Hz2/3 [53]. This paper projects even higher SFDR if the optical power is increased, detector responsivity is increased and
ACP phase modulator is improved. Calculations suggest that an
SFDR of 147 dB Hz2/3 could be achieved with a 3 dB bandwidth of 500 MHz. These calculations further predict a link
noise figure of 2.2 dB [53].
A key challenge with optical phase locked loops is that the
latency around the loop limits the RF operational frequency.
Integrating the detectors and phase modulators into a common
substrate can reduce the latency and increase the operational frequency. In a second implementation of the PHOR-FRONT optical phased-lock loop, a coherent receiver comprised a balanced
photodetector, a two-by-two waveguide multimode interference
coupler, and the integrated tracking phase modulators [55]. The
photonic chip used an adjacent electronic chip comprising a
transconductance amplifier in its feedback path to drive the integrated phase modulator. The receiver was shown to have a
bandwidth of 1.45 GHz. The SFDR was measured to be 125 dB
Hz2/3 at a frequency of 300 MHz, 121 dB Hz2/3 at 500 MHz
and 113 dB Hz2/3 at 1 GHz.
PHOR-FRONT also explored a self-homodyne coherent receiver that relies on linear optical phase encoding of the RF
signal and uses a 90 optical hybrid for in-phase/quadrature
phase demodulation [56], as shown schematically in Fig. 12.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
3435
Fig. 14. SFDR in 1 Hz noise bandwidth as a function of measured performance frequency. IMDD is an abbreviation for intensity modulation, direct
detection.
3436
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 32, NO. 20, OCTOBER 15, 2014
TABLE II
DESIRED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE METRICS FOR A
MICROWAVE-PHOTONIC-BASED CHANNELIZED RECEIVER
Fig. 15.
Parameter
Value
Frequency band
Instantaneous bandwidth
Dynamic range
Receiver sensitivity
> 50 GHz
> 5 GHz
> 60 dB
< 90 dBm
3437
VII. CONCLUSION
This paper has reviewed many of the DARPA-funded microwave photonic link developments carried out over the last
ten years. The key takeaways from these investments include
the following:
1) Reducing laser RIN and the V of electrooptic modulators as well as increasing the linearity and power handling
capability of optical detectors has improved link performance, including SFDR and NF.
2) Microwave photonic links with photonic downconversion
can yield SFDRs higher than similar microwave-only links
employing a microwave mixer for downconversion.
3) Optical phase modulation with optical phase-locked loops
can yield exceptionally high SFDRs.
4) Photonic-based predistortion compensation can effectively increase SFDR over limited bandwidths.
DARPAs Microsystems Technology Office has been a leader
in developing microwave photonic components, architectures
and links. Using these technical advances for microwave antenna remoting, photonic downconversion, and channelized receivers could significantly improve the performance metrics for
the militarys advanced receivers, including extending the frequency range, increasing the instantaneous bandwidth and dynamic range as well as improving receiver sensitivity. The next
step is to move microwave photonic technologies from these
experimental efforts and demonstrations to deployed military
systems.
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to acknowledge the past DARPA
program managers within the Microsystems Technology Office
who have developed and supported the innovative programs in
microwave photonics, including Dr. R. Leheny, Dr. S. Pappert,
Dr. M. Haney, Dr. R. Esman, and Dr. J. S. Rodgers. Without
their insights and dedication to microwave photonics, many of
these programs would not have been completed. The authors
also acknowledge Dr. J. S. Rodgers for discussions on electrooptic modulators and Prof. J. Campbell and Prof. A. Beling
of the University of Virginia for discussions on high power
photodetectors.
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
REFERENCES
[1] E. I. Ackerman, W. K. Burns, G. E. Betts, J. X. Chen, J. L. Prince,
M. D. Regan, H. V. Roussell, and C. H. Cox, III, RF-over-fiber links with
very low noise figure, J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 24412448,
Aug. 2008.
[2] S. Pappert, RF photonics: Status, challenges and opportunities, presented at the IEEE Conf. Avionics Fiber-Optics and Photonics Technology,
San Diego, CA, USA, 2011, Paper TuA4.
[3] R. Esman, S. Pappert, B. Krantz, and G. Gopalakrishnan, Photonics for
microwave generation, transmission and processing, in Proc. Opt. Fiber
Commun., San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2009, pp. 2226.
[4] R. C. Williamson and R. D. Esman, RF Photonics, J. Lightw. Technol.,
vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 11451153, May 2008.
[5] Harbour Industries, Inc. (2013, Dec. 18). Specifications for Low
loss coaxial cableSolid center conductors, Part #LL335i. [Online]. Available: http://www.harbourind.com/images/stories/datasheets/
LL_SOLID.pdf#zoom=100
[6] Optical Cable Corporation. (2013, Dec. 18). Specifications for
Military tactical fiber optic cables for extreme environments,
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
3438
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 32, NO. 20, OCTOBER 15, 2014
Richard W. Ridgway (M80SM05) received the B.S. and the M.S. degrees in
electrical engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,
in 1978 and 1979, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering
from The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, in 1985.
In July 2011, he joined the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), Arlington, VA, USA, where he is currently a Program Manager for
the Strategic Technology Office. His interests include millimeter-wave communications and microwave photonics. Prior to joining DARPA, he was a Senior
Research Leader at Battelle, Columbus, where for more than 25 years he was
involved in the development of integrated optical components for optical, microwave, and millimeter-wave communication systems. From 2001 to 2007, he
served as Chief Technology Officer for the Battelle-spinout company, Optimer
Photonics, Inc., focused on bringing electrooptic waveguide technology to the
telecommunications industry. He holds 26 US patents.
3439
Carl L. Dohrman (M08SM13) received the B.S. degree from the University
of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA, in 2002 and the Ph.D. degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, in 2008, both in
materials science and engineering.
Since 2008, he has been a Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., where
he has provided subject matter expertise in microelectronic and photonic materials, devices, and circuits to the Microsystems Technology Office and Strategic
Technology Office of the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. He
has advised on a range of projects covering microwave photonics, photonic integrated circuits, device-level heterogeneous integration technologies, RF/mixed
signal electronics, and nitride optoelectronics. He has more than 30 refereed
journal and conference publications, and one patent.
Joshua A. Conway (M13SM13) received the B.S. degree in physics and the
M.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana,
IL, USA, in 1999 and 2001, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical
engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, in 2006.
Since August 2012, he has served as a Program Manager for the Microsystems
Technology Office at the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), Arlington, VA, USA. His interests include active integrated photonic
devices, RF photonics and advanced imaging systems. Prior to joining DARPA,
he was with Kinsey Technical Services (KTSi), where he was Senior Principal
Engineer of special programs at the Los Angeles Air Force Base. Prior to
joining KTSi, he served on the technical staff of The Aerospace Corporation,
starting in 2003. From 2001 to 2003, he worked at Boeing Satellite Systems,
where he designed, built, and tested fiber-optic subsystems for inter-satellite
laser communication systems.
Dr. Conway has received numerous awards, has authored more than 30
technical papers and conference proceedings and holds eleven patents.