0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
29 vues2 pages
This document discusses the importance of elements in criminal law and how the absence of an element can result in a different crime. It provides examples of how robbery requires elements of violence, force or intimidation, while theft does not, and how murder has specific qualifying circumstances compared to homicide. The document also draws an analogy between elements of crimes and ingredients in cooking, noting how both are essential to properly identify the offense or finished dish. Only when all elements/ingredients are present can the precise crime or recipe be determined.
This document discusses the importance of elements in criminal law and how the absence of an element can result in a different crime. It provides examples of how robbery requires elements of violence, force or intimidation, while theft does not, and how murder has specific qualifying circumstances compared to homicide. The document also draws an analogy between elements of crimes and ingredients in cooking, noting how both are essential to properly identify the offense or finished dish. Only when all elements/ingredients are present can the precise crime or recipe be determined.
This document discusses the importance of elements in criminal law and how the absence of an element can result in a different crime. It provides examples of how robbery requires elements of violence, force or intimidation, while theft does not, and how murder has specific qualifying circumstances compared to homicide. The document also draws an analogy between elements of crimes and ingredients in cooking, noting how both are essential to properly identify the offense or finished dish. Only when all elements/ingredients are present can the precise crime or recipe be determined.
The elements of a crime is very important in criminal law, in order to prosecute a person to a certain crime it must first prove that the defendant committed each element of the particular crime charged. Absence of one elements of a crime could be no crime has been committed or there could be different crime has been committed. In a crime of robbery and theft. In order to charge a person for a crime of robbery, Article 239 of the Revised Penal Code, defines robbery as a crime committed by "any person who, with intent to gain, shall take any personal property belonging to another, by means of violence against or intimidation of any person, or using force upon anything, all of this elements must be proven. Theft is defined in paragraph 1 of Article 308 of the Revised Penal Code to be a felony committed by any person who, with intent to gain but without violence against or intimidation of persons or force upon things, shall take personal property of another without the latter's consent. Theft and robbery are both crimes against property; however, theft is committed without violence, force, intimidation upon things or person while in robbery there must be force, violence, and intimidation of a persons or things. Absence of violence, force, intimidation upon things or person will result to different crime. Likewise murder, homicide, parricide, and infanticide are all crime of killing but they are different to each other. A crime would be homicide if there are no qualifying circumstances, under article 248 of the Revised Penal Code it is murder if the killing is with treachery, taking advantage of superior strength, with the aid or armed men, or employing means to weaken the defense or of means or persons to insure or afford impunity; in consideration of price, reward or promise: by means of inundation, fire, poison, explosion, shipwreck, stranding of vessel, derailment or assault upon a street car or locomotive, fall of airship; by means of motor vehicles or with the use of any other means involving great waste or ruin on occasion of any of the calamities enumerated in the preceding paragraph; or of an earthquake, eruption of a volcano, destructive cyclone, epidemic or any other public calamity, with evident premeditation, with cruelty, by deliberately and inhumanely augmenting the suffering of the victim or outraging or scoffing at his person or corpse; and the killing is not infanticide. In cooking, without its main ingredients would result to different dishes. It is the same in criminal law, absence of the main elements of crime would be resulted to different crime. In cooking, ingredients are important. It is somehow important like elements of crime in criminal law. For example; in cooking an adobo, it will not become an adobo without its main ingredient, the soy sauce. A hamburger, it will not be a hamburger if theres no ham on it. A paksiw will not be a pakwis without its main ingredients vinegar and garlic.
Arguelles, Manuel Jr. E
Being an frustrated cook, at the same time a law student, it is
important for me to know and to determine ingredients in whatever dishes I want to cook and elements of crime for me to have an exact crime. It is because in both criminal law and cooking, only one of its element or ingredients is absent it will lead to different crime or different dish. This two things is somehow similar to each other in the aspect of ingredients and elements, elements is important in criminal law and also ingredients is important in cooking.