Dp-Ced-32.6 Concrete Asphalt Road

PT.
INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

DESIGN PRACTICE
CONCRETE ASPHALT ROAD

DP-CED-32.6
ORIGINATOR
REV.
00
01
Name
Signature
Didik S
Umi
DS
US
REVIEWED
BY
Name
Signature
Bambang H
BH
APPROVED BY
DATE
Name
Signature
Nyoman M
Pramono
NM
PAP
01 June 1999
08 March 2004
PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

DESIGN PRACTICE

DP-CED-32.6
REVISION CONTROL SHEET

REV.
DATE
00
01 June 99
01
08 March
04
REVISION DETAILS
Issued for release
Updated to new format standart
This document contains proprietary information and must not be disclosed to a third party without
the prior permission in writing from the company

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 1 of 24
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. GENERAL
2.
DEFINITIONS OF TERM USED
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3
3
3
3
2.4.1
2.4.2
3.
Sub Grade
Sub Base Coarse
Base Coarse
Surfacing
Binder Coarse
Wearing Coarse
3
3
BASIC INFORMATION
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.4
Climatic Data
Rainfall and Evaporation
Sub Grade Strength
Surface Water Drainage
Temperature
Soil Conditions Data
Aerial and Ground Contour Survey
Boring and Sampling
Test Of Samples Information
Moisture Content Determinations Shall Be Made
On The Sample Stage
Compaction Test
CBR (California Bearing Ratio)
Construction and Volume Of Traffic
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
4.
CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL PARTICLE
5.
CONSTITUTION OF ASPHALT CONCRETE ROAD
10
6.
PAVEMENT DESIGN PROCEDURE
10

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
6.1
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.4
6.2.5
6.3
6.3.1
6.3.2
Minimum Layer Thickness

Parameters
Terminal Service Ability Index (P)
Design Traffic
Soil Supported Values
Regional Factor
Structural Number (Sn)
Design Application
Type Of Charts
Parameter To Determined
6.3.2.1
6.3.2.2
6.3.2.3
6.3.3
6.3.4
7.
10
11
11
11
11
15
15
16
17
18
18
18
18
Charts Design
Design Summary
19
20
MATERIAL AS ASTMS STANDARD TEST
21
7.1
7.2
21
22
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.3
8.
Index Of Service Ability (P)

Soil Support Values (S)
Traffic Volume And Loads
Page 2 of 24
Material For Sub Base Coarse And Base Coarse

Material For Surface Coarse
Asphaltic Concrete Binder Coarse Base
(Lower Layers)
Asphaltic Concrete Wearing Coarse (Upper Layers)
Blank Charts For Design Purpose
REFERENCES
22
22
23
24

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 3 of 24
1. GENERAL
The purpose of this design is to establish standards and practical information for the design of
asphalt concrete road system for petrochemical and industrial facility plant as IKPTs property
design manual. Items like site clearing, earth moving, drainage system, culvert/bridge or
others which is interrelated to road design shall be referred to each of itself design manual.
2. DEFINITIONS OF TERM USED
2.1
Sub grade shall mean ground to be prepared with sufficient, bearing capacity, leveling,
compared as required by road design terms.
2.2
Sub base coarse shall mean the first layer formation of maximum 65 dia.
graded/crushed stone, thickness after compacted varied in accordance with type of
road design. (see article 6.1).
2.3
Base coarse shall mean the second formation of layer on top of sub base coarse.
Maximum grade is 50 dia. crushed stone. Thickness after compacted varied in
accordance with type of road design. (see Article 6.1).
2.4
Surfacing shall mean the final formation of layer on top of base coarse it could be
Asphalt Concrete Pavement which is usually divided on two sub layers :
2.4.1
Binder Coarse
The formation layer on top of base coarse, thickness after compacted varied in
accordance with type of road design. Maximum grade is 25 dia. mixed with sand,
ash and asphalt (see Article 7.2.1).
2.4.2
Wearing Coarse
The formation layer on top of binder coarse, as the last formation to be contacted
to the fire. Thickness after compacted varied in accordance with type of road
design. Maximum grade is 10, mixed with sand, ash and asphalt. (see Article
7.2.2).

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
3.
Page 4 of 24
BASIC INFORMATION
To completed the designs data the basic information shall be
3.1
3.1.1
Climatic Data
Rainfall and evaporation
Data of rainfall intensity shall be importance to the design related to construction
of earth work included here moisture counter during compaction.
3.1.2
Sub Grade strength

The natural moisture content of the soil will determine the subgrade strength of the
pavements design. Site investigation detail data shall be completed before
started to design stage.
3.1.3
Surface water drainage

The time period chosen for rainfall intensity is 2, 5, 10 or 20 years storm. These
time periods should approved by the Client, as well as the design type will be in
accordance to which of this time period and shall be related to safety and
economical value.
3.1.4
Temperature
In the design of flexible pavement, temperature data is important to the stiffness
by bituminous materials in which should affects the design of thickness
requirements.
3.2
3.2.1
Soil Conditions Data

Aerial and ground contour survey
To obtained the gradients shape and shall be minimum interference to existing
building or plant.
3.2.2
Boring and sampling

Shall be sufficiently closed space to indicate significant quantity of unsuitable or
contractually difficult materials present a long the route. Soil strata should be clear
and intermediate bores shall be supplemented in case obvious change at strata
are found between initial bore holes.

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 5 of 24
Sampling content of minimum 2 Kg should be taken out depth interval 500 mm in

fine grained soils for classification test. In granular soils should increase to 10 Kg
and placed in airtight containers and about 0.5 Kg same depth sample shall be
checked the moisture contents. All the bore holes should be temporarily capped
and checked for ground with level intervals until equilibrium conditions is reached.
3.3
3.3.1
Test of Samples Information

Moisture content determinations shall be made on all the sample stage
The appropriate classification should be identified to all samples. The classification
test for cohesive soils are the liquid and plastic limit. Test for granular soils is the
wet sieve particle size.
3.3.2
Compaction test-relating density and moisture content should carried out by

laboratory test.
Both standard test and heavy test should be completed to at least half of the
sample taken.
3.3.3
CBR (California Bearing Ratio) and other test

After the earth work is completed a long the lane, CBR value test should be
informed and also the relationship between CBR value, dry density and moisture
content. Also triaxial test is needed for identified the stability of the embankment
and cutting slope. The consolidation test shall be necessary if highly compressible
soils are present.
3.4
Constitution and Volume of Traffic to be Carried Out

It should be clear the type of traffic and the speed of vehicle. For petrochemical or
industrial plant, more heavy traffic like crane, trailer, trucks shall be accounted. Beside
the traffic velocity is limited from 15 MPH ( 24 Km/hour) to 25 MPH ( 40 Km/hour).
This design data shall be in accordance to classification of the road. Standard of
traffic flow shall be designed in accordance to interim guide for design and pavement
structures, American Associates of Stage Highway and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO). Table of various axle load in petrochemicals or industrial plant as shown in
Figure 1, Table 1 and Table 2.

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Figure 1
Method of Classifying Axles Types
(Book Reference No. 2, Page 41)
Page 6 of 24

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 7 of 24
Table 1
Regulations Relating to the Maximum Gross Vehicle Weight
And Maximum Overall Length Applicable in the USA
Max. Gross Weight
Lb
73 280
33.2
Arkansas, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee
76 000
34.5
Virginia
79 800
36.2
North Carolina
80 000
36.3
Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Maryland,

Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont,
Wisconsin
80 600
36.6
South Carolina
82 000
37.2
Kentucky
85 500
38.8
Kansas
86 400
39.2
New Mexico
88 000
39.9
Louisiana
88 880
40.3
Hawaii
90 000
40.8
West Virginia, Oklahoma
92 400
41.9
Alabama
95 000
43.1
Nebraska, South Dakota
99 000
44.9
Rhode Island
101 000
45.8
Wyoming
104 000
47.2
Massachusetts
105 500
47.9
Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington
109 000
49.4
Alaska
122 000
55.3
Utah
129 000
58.5
Nevada
164 000
74.4
Maximum overall length
(Tractor and semi-trailer combinations)
State
Michigan
ft
55
16.8
States
Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, New
jersey, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia
58
17.7
Hawaii
60
18.3
Alabama, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts,

Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana. New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Vermont
65
19.8
Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota,
Oklahoma, Texas, Utah
70
21.4
Colorado, Nevada, South Dakota
85
25.9
Wyoming

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 8 of 24
Table 2
Regulations Relating to the Maximum Axle Loading Applicable in the USA
Max. loading
Lb
States
Single axles
18 000
8.2
Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Tennessee
19 000
8.6
North Carolina
20 000
9.1
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West
Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming
21 600
9.8
New Mexico
22 000
10.0
Maine, District of Columbia
22 400
10.2
Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont
Tandem Axles
32 000
14.5
Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Tennessee
34 000
15.4
Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine,
Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West
Virginia, Wisconsin
36 000
16.3
Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, North
37 000
16.8
District of Columbia
40 000
18.1
Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Wyoming

Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Maryland
The following static axle loads may be used in preliminary design; i.e., until the project
scope has progressed to a point where more reliable data are established:
Kg
Minimum
Light
Single - Unit Trucks
Heavy trucks and tractor
trailer trucks
5443
5443 to 9072
10886 to 14515
14515 to 18144
Table 3
Axle load
Lb
12000
12000 to 20000
24000 to 32000
32000 to 40000

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 9 of 24
4. CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL PARTICLE

To determined the particle in soil which is ranged from several centimeters stone, sand, silt,
clay down to 0.001 MM diameter particles.
Table 4
Soils Classification
Refer to Table 2.
Particle in soils shall be divided to 4 (four) gravels.
Gravels
Sand
Silt
Clay
-----
Particles
Particles
Partical
Smaller than
2 - 60 MM diameters
0.06 - 2 MM diameters
0.002 - 0.06 MM diameters
0.002 MM diameters

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 10 of 24
5. CONSTITUTION OF ASPHALT CONCRETE ROAD
Figure 2
12.22 Neither the AASHTO nor the ASTM specifications give a strength criterion for the
compacted materials, but the Asphalt Institute Thickness Design Manual requires in its Table V3 CBR value of 20 percent for sub-base and 80 percent for base material. These are laboratory
test results carried out at the appropriate moisture content and density conditions, and tested
after 4 (four) days soaking.
6.
PAVEMENT DESIGN PROCEDURE

The following parameters to be considered during the pavement thickness design.
6.1
Minimum Layer Thickness
Consideration shall be applied to construction requirements for placing the pavement layer. By
minimal thickness is 1 1/4 to 1 1/2 times the largest aggregate sizes, a minimum
layers shall be:
Subbase coarse Base coarse
Surface coarse -
6.2
Parameters
minimum thickness
minimum thickness
minimum thickness
= 4 (100)
= 3 (75)
= 1 (38)

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 11 of 24
This design procedure is following AASHTO Interim Guide for Design of Pavement
Structures.
6.2.1
Terminal serviceability index P T

PT is based on the lowest index that will be tolerate before resurfacing or
reconstruction become necessary.
Index PT
Index PT
6.2.2
= 2.5
= 2
is applied for major highway

is applied for highway with small traffic volume.
Design traffic
The procedure in AASHTO Interim Guide for Design of Pavement Structure is to
convert the varying axle load to one design load only. This design load is 18 Kip
single axle load. See Table 5 and Table 6.
6.2.3
Soil supported values

Parameter S is represent the soil support value and already done by empirical.
Grade of S is divided by 10 degrees which is started from degree of hardness
colloin, clay, silty clay, silt, silty sand, sand, sandy gravel, gravel, hard rock.
S = 3 is represent silty clay, sub grade as AASHTO road test and S = 10
represent crushed road base test.

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 12 of 24
a. Single Axles. Pt = 2.0

Axle loads,
kips
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
0.0002
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.16
0.32
0.59
1.00
1.61
2.49
3.71
5.36
7.54
10.38
14.00
18.55
24.20
31.14
39.57
0.0002
0.003
0.01
0.04
0.08
0.18
0.34
0.60
1.00
1.59
2.44
3.62
5.21
7.31
10.03
13.51
17.87
23.30
29.95
38.02
Structural Number SN
3
4
0.0002
0.002
0.01
0.04
0.09
0.19
0.35
0.61
1.00
1.56
2.35
3/43
4.88
6.78
9.24
12.37
16.30
21.16
27.12
34.34
0.0002
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.18
0.35
0.61
1.00
1.55
2.31
3.33
4.68
6.42
8.65
11.46
14.97
19.28
24.55
30.92
0.0002
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.17
0.34
0.60
1.00
1.57
2.35
3.40
4.77
6.52
8.73
11.48
14.87
19.02
24.03
30.04
0.0002
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.17
.033
0.60
1.00
1.60
2.41
3.51
4.96
6.83
9.17
12.17
15.63
19.93
25.10
31.25
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.11
0.16
0.24
0.34
0.47
0.63
0.83
1.08
1.38
1.73
2.16
2.66
3.24
3.91
4.68
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.10
0.16
0.23
0.33
0.46
0.62
0.82
1.07
1.38
1.74
2.18
2.70
3.31
4.02
4.83
b. Tandem Axles Pt = 2.0

Axle load
kips
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.10
0.16
0.23
0.32
0.45
0.61
0.81
1.06
1.38
1.76
2.22
2.77
3.42
4.20
5.10
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.12
0.17
0.24
0.34
0.46
0.62
0.82
1.07
1.38
1.75
2.19
2.73
3.36
4.11
4.98
3
4
0.01.
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.12
0.18
2.26
0.36
0.49
0.65
0.84
1.08
1.38
1.73
2.15
2.64
3.23
3.92
4.72
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.12
0.17
0.25
0.35
0.48
0.64
0.84
1.08
1.38
1.72
2.13
2.62
3.18
3.83
4.58
Table 5
Traffic Expression to Equivalent 18 Kip Single Axle Load
(Book Reference No. 1, Page 16-44)

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Figure 3
Conversion of Axle Load to Equivalent Standard Axle
c. Single Axles Pt = 2.5

Axle load
Page 13 of 24

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 14 of 24
kips
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
0.0004
0.003
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.17
0.33
0.59
1.00
2.61
2.48
3.69
5.33
7.49
10.31
13.90
18.41
24.02
30.90
39.26
0.0004
0.004
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.36
0.61
1.00
1.57
2.38
3.49
4.99
6.98
9.55
12.82
16.94
22.04
28.30
35.89
0.0003
0.004
0.02
0.05
0.12
0.23
0.40
0.65
1.00
1.49
2.17
3.09
4.31
5.90
7.94
10.52
13.74
17.73
22.61
28.51
0.0002
0.003
0.01
0.04
0.10
0.21
0.39
0.65
1.00
1.47
2.09
2.89
3.91
5.21
6.83
8.85
11.34
14.38
18.06
22.50
0.0002
0.003
0.01
0.03
0.09
0.19
0.36
0.62
1.00
1.54
2.18
3.03
4.09
5.39
6.97
8.88
11.18
13.93
17.20
21.08
0.0002
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.18
0.34
0.61
1.00
1.55
2.30
3.27
4.48
5.98
7.79
9.95
12.51
15.50
18.98
23.04
d. Tandem axles Pt = 2.5

Axle load
kips
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.07
0.11
0.16
0.23
0.33
0.45
0.61
0.81
1.06
1.38
1.75
2.21
2.76
3.41
4.18
5.08
0.10
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.10
0.14
0.20
0.27
0.37
0.49
0.65
0.84
1.08
1.38
1.73
2.16
2.67
3.27
3.98
4.80
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.11
0.16
0.23
0.31
0.42
0.55
0.70
0.89
1.11
1.38
1.69
2.06
2.49
2.99
3.58
4.25
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.14
0.21
0.29
0.40
0.53
0.70
0.89
1.11
1.38
1.68
2.03
2.43
2.88
3.40
3.98
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.12
0.18
0.26
0.36
0.50
0.66
0.86
1.09
1.38
1.70
2.08
2.51
3.00
3.55
4.17
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.11
0.17
0.24
0.34
0.47
0.63
0.83
1.08
1.38
1.73
2.14
2.61
3.16
3.79
4.49
Table 6
Traffic Expression to Equivalent 18 Laps Single Axle Load
6.2.4
Regional factor
This parameter R (= Regional Factor) is described climatic and environmental factors.

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 15 of 24
Based on road test information R values should be :
6.2.5
Sub grade material frozen to a depth 5 inch (125) or more R = 0.2 to 1.0
Sub grade material, dry, summer and fall : R = 0.3 to 1.5
Sub grade material, wet, spring thaw R = 4.0 to 5.0
Structural number SN
This parameter SN (Structural Number) is indicate the structural strength of pavement required
to a given combination of soil support value, with total equivalent 18 Kips, single axle
load, terminal serviceability index, and regional factor. The required SN must be
converted to actual thickness of surfacing, base coarse, and sub base coarse with
each of appropriate layer coefficient.
SN
a
a
a
1
2
3
D1
D2
D3
a1 D1 a2 D2 a3 D3
= Layer coefficient for surfacing
= Layer coefficient for base coarse
= Layer coefficient for sub base coarse
= Actual thickness (Inch) of surface
= Actual thickness (Inch) of base coarse
= Actual thickness (Inch) of sub base coarse
On Table 7 various layers coefficient proposed by AASHTO test.
Coefficients proposed by AASHTO committee on design )

Pavement component
Coefficient

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
a1
a2
a3
*
Surface coarse
Road mix(low stability)
Plant mix(High stability)
Stand asphalt
Subbase coarse
Sandy gravel
Sand or sandy clay
Design Application
In accordance with 2 (two) types of serviceability index
PT = 2.0 and PT = 2.5
6.3.1
0.07
0.14
0.23
0.20
0.15
0.34
0.30
0.15 - 0.30
0.11
0.05 - 0.10
From Interim guide for design of pavement structures, American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials, 1972
Established from AASHTO road test
Compressive strength at 7 days
This value has been estimated from AASHTO road tests, but not to the accuracy of those factors
marked with
Table 7
Layers Coefficient a1, a2, a3
6.3
0.20
0.44
0.40
Base coarse
- Sandy gravel
- Crushed stone
- Cement-treated (no soil cement)
Compressive strength @ 7 days
650 psi or more
400 psi to 650 psi
400 psi or less
- Bituminous-treated
Coarse-graded
Sand asphalt
Lime-treated
Page 16 of 24
Type of charts

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 17 of 24
Figure 4
Design Chart for Flexible Pavement, with pt = 2.0
(Interim Guide for Design of Pavement Structures.
American Assosiation of State Highway and Transportation Official)
(See Book Reference No. 1, Page 16-56)
Figure 5
Design Chart for Flexible Pavement with Terminal Serviceability
index pt = 2.5 (Interim Guide for Design of Pavement Structures
6.3.2
6.3.2.1
Parameters to determined
Index of serviceability Pt
In accordance to the requirements of concrete asphalt road in petrochemical
on industrial plant. The design in majority shall be concerned to the heavy

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 18 of 24
loading truck or trailer to serve the maintenance, loading or unloading of

production. In other way, if the road is limited only to the plant vehicle its
mean the traffic volume will be lesser than if public vehicle is included. To
decide index of serviceability Pt = 2.0 is reasonable. Otherwise whenever the
public vehicle will accounted to enter the road wages plant, index of
serviceability will be using Pt = 2.5.
6.3.2.2
Soil support values S

Refer to the soil condition data, (See Article 3.2 and Article 6.2.3). The natural
soil in subgrade already determined and values of soil support values S is
taken.
6.3.2.3
Traffic volume and loads

For preliminary traffic volume and loads, the static axle loads of Article 3.4 is
our first estimate design capacity, before more reliable data according to the
Project Scope already formal released.
Vehicle Type
1.
2.
Plant transport
Light truck
service/ product
3. Single unit truck
product - load/
unload
4. Trailer - tractor
very heavy truck
12000
20000
Single
Single
Coeff. equiv.
18Kip
Single axis
load
0.19
1.56
32000
Tandem
40000
Tandem
Axle load (LBS)
Axle type
Traffic/days
Total X coeff
20 years
Total load X 103
400
100
76
156
554.8
1138.8
0.84
75
63
459.9
2.15
40
86
627.8
Total
650
381
2781.3
Table 9
Estimation of Traffic Volume and Loads
Condition :
6.3.3
Location petrochemical/Industrial plant, public vehicle not entered.

Index of serviceability Pt = 2.0
Regional factor R = 4.0
Support of soil subgrade, Silty sandy S = 5
Structural number SN = Estimate = 3
Surface asphalt concrete: coefficient 0.44
Base coarse/subbase coarse - crushed stone coefficient 0.14
Charts design
Using the Figure 6 (chart)

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Step 1
Step 2
=
=
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Page 19 of 24
Enter values soil support S = 5 to graph No.1

Enter total coefficient = 381 to graph No.3 or total 20 years =
2,781.3 x 103 to Graph No. 2
Extent the straight line to touch graph No.4 we found S
=@
3.1 (our Estimate R = 3)
Refer to regional factor R = 4 (Graph 5) Extent Graph 4 and 5
and touched Graph 6 Weighed Structural Number SN = 3.7
Refer to Article 6.2.5
SN = a1 D1 + a2 D2 + a3 D3
By using Table 7
Layers coefficient
a1 = Plant mix
a2 = Crushed stone
a3 = Crushed stone
= 0.44
= 0.14
= 0.14
Trial (1) for reference minimum thickness see Article 6.1

D1 = Surface Wearing coarse 1
(=38)
Binder coarse
2
(=50)
Total 3
(=88)
D2 = Base coarse 6 = 150
D3 = Sub base coarse 10 = 250
Enter to equation

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 20 of 24
SN = a1 D1 + a2 D2 + a3 D3
SN = 0.44 x 3 + 0.14 x 6 + 0.14 x 10
= 1.54
+ 0.84 + 1.40
= 3.78 > weighted structural number SN = 3.7 design of pavement is
OK
6.3.4
Design Summary
Location
Petrochemical/Industrial Plant, No Public Vehicle
Traffic volume :
Plant transport car
Light truck
Unit truck
Trailer, tractor, very heavy truck
Parameter used :
Index of serviceability
Regional factor
Support of soil subgrade silty sandy
1st estimate structural number
Surface asphalt concrete
Base/subbase coarse graded
crushed stone
Axle
- Single 12000 LBS
- Single 20000 LBS
- Tandem 32000 LBS
- Tandem 40000 LBS
Total
No/Days
400
100
75
40
615
Pt = 2.0
R=4
S=5
SN = 3
Coefficient 0.44
Coefficient 0.14
Design result: (start from subgrade)

1) Bed
Sub grade
2) 1st Layer
Sub base coarse
2nd Layer
base coarse
3rd Layer
surface coarse
treated well to compacted to 90 % of dry

density, CBR 4 or bigger
graded crushed stone max dia 2 (50),
CBR 20, thickness 10(=250)
graded crushed stone max dia 1 1/2(38)
CBR = 80
Thickness = 6 (=150)
lower lays-- Binder coarse 2 (=50) Thk
Upper layer-- wearing coarse 1 (38) Thk
Asphalt concrete surfacing 3 (=88) Thk
For detailed formation see Figure 2 (one of already executed design)

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
Page 21 of 24
7. MATERIAL AS ASTM STANDARD TEST

7.1
Material for Sub Base Coarse and Base Coarse

Table 10
Grading Requirements for Bases and Sub Bases for Highways
and Airports to ASTM Designation D2940-74
(Reapproved 1985)
Grading: Percentage
passing
Sieve size
Bases
Sub - bases
50 mm
37.5 mm
19 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
600 m
75 m
100
95 - 100
70 - 92
50 - 70
35 - 55
12 - 25
0-8
100
90 - 100
--------30 - 60
----0 - 12
Other Requirements :
1. Coarse aggregate to be hard and durable
2. Fraction passing the 75-m sieve not to exceed 60 per cent of the fraction
passing the 600-m sieve.
3. Fraction passing the 425-m sieve shall have a liquid limit no greater than
25 per cent and a plasticity index not greater than 4 per cent.
Figure 7
Materials for Unbound Sub-base and Base --- ASTM Designation D2940-74

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
7.2
7.2.1
Page 22 of 24
Material for Surface Coarse as ASTM C 117 and ASTM C 136

Asphaltic concrete binder coarse base (lower layers)
Item
Aggregate and filler

Passing
Percent
1-1/2 inch sieve

1 Inch sieve
1/2 Inch sieve
No.4 sieve
No. 10 sieve
No. 40 sieve
No. 80 sieve
No. 200 sieve
100
80 - 100
60 - 80
40 - 55
30 - 45
15 - 30
8 - 20
2 - 8
Asphalt amount : 4.5 to 6.5% of aggregate weight

Asphalt penetration
: 60 to 100 (1/10 mm)
7.2.2
Asphaltic concrete wearing coarse (upper layer)

Item
Passing
Percent

1/2 inch sieve

3/8 inch sieve
No. 4 sieve
No. 10 sieve
No. 40 sieve
No. 80 sieve
No 200 sieve
100
80 - 100
55 - 75
40 - 55
18 - 33
10 - 22
1 - 10
Asphalt amount
Asphalt penetration
: 5.0 to 7.0% of aggregate weight

: 80 to 120 (1/10 mm)

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
7.3
Page 23 of 24
Blank Charts for Design Purpose
Chart 1
Design Chart for Flexible Pavement with Pt = 2.0
Chart 2
Design Chart for Flexible Pavement with Terminal Serviceability Index Pt = 2.5

DESIGN PRACTICE
DP-CED-32.6
8.
Page 24 of 24
REFERENCE
BOOK REFERENCES
1)Standard Handbook For Civil Engineer
By Frederick S. Merrit; Third Edition 1983
2)The Design and Performance of Road pavements
By Daved Croneu and Paul Croneu, Second Edition
Mc. Graw Hill International series in Civil Engineering
STANDARD REFERENCES
1)AASHTO
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
2)ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

Dp-Ced-32.6 Concrete Asphalt Road

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Dp-Ced-32.6 Concrete Asphalt Road

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

PT.

INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

CONCRETE ASPHALT ROAD

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

CONCRETE ASPHALT ROAD

REVISION CONTROL SHEET

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

DEFINITIONS OF TERM USED

CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL PARTICLE

CONSTITUTION OF ASPHALT CONCRETE ROAD

PAVEMENT DESIGN PROCEDURE

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

Minimum Layer Thickness

MATERIAL AS ASTMS STANDARD TEST

Index Of Service Ability (P)

Material For Sub Base Coarse And Base Coarse

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

Sub Grade strength

Surface water drainage

Soil Conditions Data

Boring and sampling

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

CONCRETE ASPHALT ROAD

Sampling content of minimum 2 Kg should be taken out depth interval 500 mm in

Test of Samples Information

Compaction test-relating density and moisture content should carried out by

CBR (California Bearing Ratio) and other test

Constitution and Volume of Traffic to be Carried Out

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

CONCRETE ASPHALT ROAD

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

Arkansas, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee

Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Maryland,

West Virginia, Oklahoma

Nebraska, South Dakota

Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington

Alabama, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts,

Colorado, Nevada, South Dakota

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Tennessee

Maine, District of Columbia

Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Tennessee

Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, North

Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Wyoming

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

4. CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL PARTICLE

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

5. CONSTITUTION OF ASPHALT CONCRETE ROAD

PAVEMENT DESIGN PROCEDURE

Minimum Layer Thickness

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

Terminal serviceability index P T

is applied for major highway

Soil supported values

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

a. Single Axles. Pt = 2.0

b. Tandem Axles Pt = 2.0

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK

c. Single Axles Pt = 2.5

PT. INTI KARYA PERSADA TEHNIK