Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Michelle Bates
Principles of Economics
Professor: Christine Farias
Strayer University
Date: January 29, 2015
Economics 100
The article in question dwells upon the demand and supply correlation in the
commodity market in 2014. First, Sanderson and Hume (2014) note that demand for such
resources as iron ore, oil and others was quite significant in the 2014. Although there was
certain slow-down in development of markets in Asia and Europe, the demand did not
decrease dramatically during the year. However, the researchers also add another point. They
state that the supply increased significantly, as companies were willing to make more profits
and win larger markets.
Sanderson and Hume (2014) point out that the correlation between supply and
demand was violated. Thus, the authors note that supply grew by 12% in 2014 while demand
only increased by 9%. This led to the markets saturation and, as a result, to decrease in
prices. Finally, the authors conclude that demand is unlikely to return to the level of previous
years due to the slow-down in development of such markets as China.
This article can be seen as an example of the correlation between supply and
demand. It has been acknowledged that supply and demand are very close and they have a
significant impact on each other (Causevic, 2014). Thus, when supply for certain products are
decreasing, the demand is likely to decrease. Clearly, the right correlation between the two
concepts is important for products prices and producers (and sometimes governments) have
to undertake certain steps to affect prices. It is possible to note that there are numerous ways
to do that. Rahji and Adewumi (2008) state that the government should respond to the change
in correlation; when it comes to the grain market. Hence, the researchers note that the
government should restrict import of the product to increase the demand as well as prices
(Rahji & Adewumi, 2008).