Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1 / 54
2 / 54
3 / 54
The bond price P(t, T ) is also a stochastic object with two variables
t and T , and for each outcome in the underlying sample space, the
dependence upon these variables is different.
Fix t; P(t, T ) is a function of maturity date T
The function provides prices for bonds of all possible maturities
at a fixed time t. The graph of the function is called bond
price curve at t, or the term structure of t. Typically it will
be a very smooth graph, i.e. for each t, P(t, T ) is differentiable
with respect to T .
4 / 54
5 / 54
Interest Rates
6 / 54
7 / 54
8 / 54
P(t, S)
P(t, T )
9 / 54
10 / 54
log P(S, T )
T S
11 / 54
log P(t, T )
T
12 / 54
We note that the spot rates are forward rates where the time of
contracting coincides with the start of the interval over which the
interest rate is effective, i.e. t = S.
The instantaneous forward rate is the limit of the continuously
compounded forward rate when S T ; it can be viewed as the
riskless interest rate, contracted at t, over the infinitesimal interval
[T , T + dT ].
13 / 54
14 / 54
15 / 54
Definition
(Money-market account). We define Bt to be the value of a bank
account at time t R+ , and its given by
Bt = e
Rt
0
r (u)du
16 / 54
Lemma
The price of the bond can be expressed as
Z T
P(t, T ) = exp
f (t, u)du
t
f (t, u)du
17 / 54
(1)
(2)
(3)
The processes a(t) and b(t) are scalar adapted processes, whereas
m(t, T ), v (t, T ), (t, T ) and (t, T ) are adapted processes paramaterized by
time of maturity T . The interpretation of the bond price equation (2) and the
forward rate equation (3) is that these are scalar stochastic differential equations
(in the t-variable) for each fixed time of maturity T .
Bonds and Interest Rates
18 / 54
We will study the formal relations which must hold between bond
prices and interest rates, and for this we establish the following
assumptions:
1
For each fixed , t all the objects m(t, T ), v (t, T ), (t, T ) and
(t, T ) are assumed to be continuously differentiable in the
T -variable. This partial T -derivative is sometimes denoted by
mT (t, T ) etc.
All processes are such that we can differentiate under the
integral sign as well as interchange the order of integration.
The main result is as follows. Note that the results below hold,
regardless of the measure under consideration, and in particular, we
do not assume that markets are free of arbitrage.
19 / 54
Proposition
.
If P(t, T ) satisfies
dP(t, T ) = P(t, T )m(t, T )dt + P(t, T )v (t, T )dWt
the the forward rate dynamics have
df (t, T ) = (t, T )dt + (t, T )dWt
where and are given by
(t, T ) = vT (t, T ) v (t, T ) mT (t, T )
(t, T ) = vT (t, T )
20 / 54
Proposition
2. If f (t, T ) satisfies
df (t, T ) = (t, T )dt + (t, T )dWt
then the short rate satisfies
dr (t) = a(t)dt + b(t)dWt
where
21 / 54
Proposition
3. If f (t, T ) satisfies
df (t, T ) = (t, T )dt + (t, T )dWt
then P(t, T ) satisfies
1
dP(t, T ) = P(t, T ) r (t) + A(t, T ) + S 2 (t, T ) dt + P(t, T )S(t, T )dWt
2
where
RT
A(t, T ) = t (t, s)ds
RT
S(t, T ) = t (t, s)ds
22 / 54
Interest models behave differently from stock prices and require the
development of specific models to account for properties such as
positivity, boundedness and return to equilibrium. Refer to the other
handouts for a list of short rate models
For this section, we consider classical time homogenous short rate
models, i.e. the assumed short rate dynamics depended only constant
coefficients. The focus would be on the Vasicek (1977), the Dothan
(1978) and the Cox, Ingersoll and Ross (1985) models.
23 / 54
24 / 54
and for s t
rt = rs e
k(ts)
+ 1e
k(ts)
Z
+
e k(tu) dWu
25 / 54
26 / 54
i
h
Var [rt | Fs ] = E (rt E [ rt | Fs ])2 Fs
" Z
2 #
t
= E 2
e k(tu) dWu Fs
s
#
"Z
2
t
2
k(tu)
= E
e
dWu
s
2
Z
= E
2k(tu)
2k(tu)
du
s
2
Z
= E
du
2
1 e 2k(ts)
2k
27 / 54
28 / 54
1 2
a (t s) + (Wt Ws )
2
for s t.
29 / 54
= rs e a(ts)
30 / 54
Var [ rt | Fs ] = E rt2 |Fs (E [rt |Fs ])2
i
h
2
= E rs2 e (2a )(ts)+2(Wt Ws ) |Fs rs2 e 2a(ts)
2
= rs2 e (2a )(ts) E e 2(Wt Ws ) |Fs rs2 e 2a(ts)
2
= r 2 e (2a )(ts) E e 2(Wt Ws ) r 2 e 2a(ts)
s
= rs2 e (
1
(2)2 (ts)
2
)(ts) e
rs2 e 2a(ts)
h 2
i
= rs2 e 2a(ts) e (ts) 1
2a 2
31 / 54
32 / 54
Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (1985)
The general equilibrium approach developed by Cox, Ingersoll and
Ross (1985) led to the introduction of a square root term in the
diffusion coefficient of the instantaneous short rate dynamics
proposed by Vasicek. The resulting model, which is also mean
reverting, has been a benchmark for many years because of its
analytical tractability and the fact that the short rate is always
positive.
33 / 54
34 / 54
t = ct r0 exp(kt)
X
e /2 (/2)i
i=0
i!
35 / 54
36 / 54
We remark that while the above time homogenous models allow for
the analytical pricing of bond and bond options, these models dont
tend to fit well with initial observed term structure in the market,
regardless of how the parameters are chosen. Consequently, some
practitioners are reluctant to apply such kinds of models. Hence, we
may consider time dependent extensions of the above models. For
example, the Hull White model
drt = k (t rt ) dt + dWt
is a time dependent extension of the Vasicek model. The CIR also
admits a similar time-dependent extension (refer to handout for more
models).
37 / 54
We highlight the relationship between the bond price P(t, T ) and the
short rate process {rt }tR+ under the absence of arbitrage condition
by considering the following scenarios:
The short rate is a deterministic constant r > 0. In this case,
P(t, T ) should satisfy
e r (T t) P(t, T ) = P(T , T ) = 1,
t [0, T ]
therefore
P(t, T ) = e r (T t) ,
t [0, T ]
38 / 54
RT
t
ru du
t [0, T ]
(4)
39 / 54
40 / 54
is equivalent to P, under
We remark that the risk neutral measure P
s)}0sT defined by
which for all s [0, T ], the process {P(t,
s) = e
P(t,
Rt
0
ru du
P (t, s) =
P (t, s)
Bt
is a P-martingale.
41 / 54
42 / 54
bt
a
+
1 e bt +
b
e b(tu) dWu
43 / 54
1
1 e b(T t)
b
and
A(t, T ) =
2ab 2
2 2
(B(t,
T
)
T
+
t)
B (t, T )
2b 2
4b
44 / 54
h =
k 2 + 2 2
2k/2
45 / 54
46 / 54
Both Vasicek and CIR models seen earlier are affine models, since
their corresponding bond prices has the above form. The Dothan
model is not an affine model.
47 / 54
Now assume that we have the risk neutral dynamics for the short rate
given by
drt = b(t, rt )dt + (t, rt )dWt
The conditions for which b and admits an affine term structure is
given by
b(t, x) = (t)x + (t)
p
(t, x) =
(t)x + (t)
that is, b and 2 are also affine functions themselves.
48 / 54
log P(t, T )
T
If the short rate folows the Vasicek stochastic interest rate model,
that is
drt = (a brt )dt + dWt
then
f (t, T ) = rt e b(T t) +
2
a
2
1 e b(T t) 2 1 e b(T t)
b
2b
49 / 54
=
1 e b(T t) e b(T t) dt + e b(T t) dWt
b
Z T
2 b(T t)
b(st)
= e
e
ds dt + e b(T t) dWt
t
50 / 54
Z
(t, T ) = e
= e
b(T t)
Z
b(st)
ds
t
T
b(st)
ds
Z
= (t, T )
(t, s)ds
t
51 / 54
52 / 54
53 / 54
References
1
54 / 54