CITY OF CARMEL BY THE SEA REDACTION LOG

PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST NO. 2015-008

DATE

1.

7/3/14

AUTHOR

Jason Stilwell

DOCSOC/1693902v1/102910-0002

TO

Carrie Theis;
Jason
Burnett; Ken
Talmage;
Steve Dallas;
V. Beach;
Don
Freeman;
Dinkin,
Jeffrey

TYPE

REASON FOR REDACTION OR WITHHOLDING

E-mail

Withholding of writings reflecting an attorneys impressions,

conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories pursuant to the
Attorney Work-Product Exemption codified in California Code of Civil
Procedure section 2018.010 et seq. and applicable to the Public Records
Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See County of Los
Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad II) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819, 833
[Writings prepared by an attorney while acting in litigation or nonlitigation capacity are protected from disclosure under the Public
Records Act.]; and
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]

DATE

2.

7/3/14

AUTHOR

Jason Stilwell

DOCSOC/1693902v1/102910-0002

TO

Carrie Theis;
Jason
Burnett; Ken
Talmage;
Steve Dallas;
V. Beach;
Don
Freeman;
Dinkin,
Jeffrey

TYPE

REASON FOR REDACTION OR WITHHOLDING

E-mail

Withholding of writings reflecting an attorneys impressions,

conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories pursuant to the
Attorney Work-Product Exemption codified in California Code of Civil
Procedure section 2018.010 et seq. and applicable to the Public Records
Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See County of Los
Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad II) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819, 833
[Writings prepared by an attorney while acting in litigation or nonlitigation capacity are protected from disclosure under the Public
Records Act.]; and
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]

DATE

3.

4.

8/20/14

On or
about
July 30,
2014

AUTHOR

Jason Stilwell

Jason Burnett

DOCSOC/1693902v1/102910-0002

TO

TYPE

Jason
Burnett;
Leanne
Graham

E-mail and
Attachment

Jason
Stilwell; Don
Freeman;
Leanne
Graham

E-mail

REASON FOR REDACTION OR WITHHOLDING

Withholding of writings reflecting an attorneys impressions,
conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories pursuant to the
Attorney Work-Product Exemption codified in California Code of Civil
Procedure section 2018.010 et seq. and applicable to the Public Records
Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See County of Los
Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad II) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819, 833
[Writings prepared by an attorney while acting in litigation or nonlitigation capacity are protected from disclosure under the Public
Records Act.]; and
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]

DATE

5.

6.

On or
about
July 30,
2014

Unknown

AUTHOR

Jason Stilwell

Jason Stilwell

DOCSOC/1693902v1/102910-0002

TO

TYPE

Jason
Burnett; Don
Freeman;
Leanne
Graham

E-mail and
attachment

Jason
Burnett; Jeff
Dinkin; Don
Freeman;
Mike
Calhoun

E-mail

REASON FOR REDACTION OR WITHHOLDING

Withholding of writings reflecting an attorneys impressions,
conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories pursuant to the
Attorney Work-Product Exemption codified in California Code of Civil
Procedure section 2018.010 et seq. and applicable to the Public Records
Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See County of Los
Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad II) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819, 833
[Writings prepared by an attorney while acting in litigation or nonlitigation capacity are protected from disclosure under the Public
Records Act.]; and
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]

DATE

7.

On or
about
August 5,
2014

AUTHOR

Jason Stilwell

DOCSOC/1693902v1/102910-0002

TO

Jason
Burnett; Don
Freeman;
Leanne
Graham

TYPE

REASON FOR REDACTION OR WITHHOLDING

E-mail

Withholding of writings reflecting an attorneys impressions,

conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories pursuant to the
Attorney Work-Product Exemption codified in California Code of Civil
Procedure section 2018.010 et seq. and applicable to the Public Records
Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See County of Los
Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad II) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819, 833
[Writings prepared by an attorney while acting in litigation or nonlitigation capacity are protected from disclosure under the Public
Records Act.]; and
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]

DATE

8.

On or
about
July 22,
2014

AUTHOR

Jason Stilwell

DOCSOC/1693902v1/102910-0002

TO

Jason
Burnett; Don
Freeman;

TYPE

REASON FOR REDACTION OR WITHHOLDING

E-mail

Withholding of writings reflecting an attorneys impressions,

conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories pursuant to the
Attorney Work-Product Exemption codified in California Code of Civil
Procedure section 2018.010 et seq. and applicable to the Public Records
Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See County of Los
Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad II) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819, 833
[Writings prepared by an attorney while acting in litigation or nonlitigation capacity are protected from disclosure under the Public
Records Act.]; and
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]

DATE

9.

10.

AUTHOR

On or
about
July 31,
2014

Jason Stilwell

On or
about
August
4, 2014

Jason Stilwell

DOCSOC/1693902v1/102910-0002

TO

Jason
Burnett; Don
Freeman;

Jason Burnett

TYPE

E-mail and
attachment

E-mail

REASON FOR REDACTION OR WITHHOLDING

Withholding of writings reflecting an attorneys impressions,
conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories pursuant to the
Attorney Work-Product Exemption codified in California Code of Civil
Procedure section 2018.010 et seq. and applicable to the Public Records
Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See County of Los
Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad II) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819, 833
[Writings prepared by an attorney while acting in litigation or nonlitigation capacity are protected from disclosure under the Public
Records Act.]; and
Withholding of writings reflecting confidential communications
between attorney and client pursuant to the Attorney-Client Privilege
codified in California Evidence Code section 954 and applicable to the
Public Records Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See
Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993) 5 Cal.4th 363, 371 [Attorney-client
communications in litigation and non-litigation situations are protected
from disclosure under the Public Records Act.]
Withholding of writings reflecting an attorneys impressions,
conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories pursuant to the
Attorney Work-Product Exemption codified in California Code of Civil
Procedure section 2018.010 et seq. and applicable to the Public Records
Act pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k); See County of Los
Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad II) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819, 833
[Writings prepared by an attorney while acting in litigation or nonlitigation capacity are protected from disclosure under the Public
Records Act.];