Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Accepted 03/26/06
Artigo
Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Biologia da Reproduo, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, 36036-900,
Juiz de Fora, Brazil,
2
Faculdade de Farmcia e Bioqumica, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, 36036-970,
Juiz de Fora, Brazil,
3
Departamento de Cincias Biolgicas, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia,
45200-000, Jequi, Brasil
INTRODUCTION
Medicinal plants have long been used by the
peoples of the world for treating their illnesses, but many
substances found in them may be harmful to the organism.
A large number of plants are known for their teratogenic
and abortive properties (Keeler, 1990; Norton, 1996;
Mengue et al., 2001) or for their toxic effect on the male
reproductive system (Soufir et al., 1989).
There are a number of agents that can have
an adverse effect on the male reproductive system,
for example by interfering with sexual maturation,
ISSN 0102-695X
324
Rita de Cssia da Silveira e S, Magda N. Leite, Leandra E.G. Oliveira, Melina M. Toledo, Tnia C. Greggio, Martha O. Guerra
Preliminary assessment of Rosmarinus officinalis toxicity on male Wistar rats organs and reproductive system
350
Treated
Weight (g)
Control
300
250
200
0
Day
Figure 1. Body weight of control and R. officinalis- treated Wistar rats during exposure of five days
and death at three days after the end of treatment (291.2 mg/kg of body weight; Control N = 10,
Treated N = 11).
40
Treated
Control
30
20
10
0
0
Day
Figure 2. Daily food consumption of control and R. officinalis- treated Wistar rats during exposure
of five days and death at three days after the end of treatment (291.2 mg/kg of body weight; Control
N = 10, Treated N = 11).
326
Rita de Cssia da Silveira e S, Magda N. Leite, Leandra E.G. Oliveira, Melina M. Toledo, Tnia C. Greggio, Martha O. Guerra
350
Treated
Weight (g)
Control
300
250
200
0
12
16
20
Day
Figure 3. Body weight of control and R. officinalis- treated Wistar rats during exposure of five days
and death at 14 days after the end of treatment (291.2 mg/kg of body weight; Control N = 12, Treated
N = 10).
40
Treated
Control
30
20
10
0
0
10
12
14
16
18
20
Day
Figure 4. Daily food consumption of control and R. officinalis- treated Wistar rats during exposure
of five days and death at 14 days after the end of treatment (291.2 mg/kg of body weight; Control
N = 12, Treated N = 10).
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed using the Students t
test and the Mann-Whitney test ( = 0.05) (Sokal; Rohlf,
1995) and were expressed by mean and standard deviation
(SD).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
327
Preliminary assessment of Rosmarinus officinalis toxicity on male Wistar rats organs and reproductive system
325
Treated
Weight (g)
Control
300
275
250
225
0
Day
Figure 5. Body weight of control and R. officinalis- treated Wistar rats during exposure of five days
and death at three days after the end of treatment (582.4 mg/kg of body weight; Control N = 12,
Treated N = 12).
25.0
Treated
Control
22.5
20.0
17.5
15.0
0
Day
Figure 6. Daily food consumption of control and R. officinalis- treated Wistar rats during exposure
of five days and death at three days after the end of treatment (582.4 mg/kg of body weight; Control
N = 12, Treated N = 12).
328
Rita de Cssia da Silveira e S, Magda N. Leite, Leandra E.G. Oliveira, Melina M. Toledo, Tnia C. Greggio, Martha O. Guerra
Table 1. Weights of vital and reproductive organs of control and Rosmarinus officinalis-treated adult male Wistar rats during
exposure of five days and death at three days after the end of treatment
Groups (g)
Weights
Brain
Pituitary gland (mg)
Liver
Right kidney
Left kidney
Lung
Right testis
Left testis
Left epididymis
Prostate
Seminal vesicle
Control
1.090.06
8.600.70
11.220.87
1.110.11
1.070.10
1.420.15
1.390.09
1.390.08
0.440.01
0.250.03
0.310.03
Treated
1.080.11
7.820.87
10.481.34
1.010.07
1.080.11
1.330.18
1.310.07
1.300.06
0.450.03
0.230.05
0.310.02
Results are expressed in mean S.D. P>0.05. (Control N = 10; Treated N = 11)
Table 2. Weights of vital and reproductive organs of control and Rosmarinus officinalis-treated adult male Wistar rats during
exposure of five days and death at 14 days after the end of treatment
Groups (g)
Weights
Brain
Pituitary gland (mg)
Liver
Right kidney
Left kidney
Lung
Right testis
Left testis
Left epididymis
Prostate
Seminal vesicle
Control
1.070.06
7.750.75
11.761.35
1.050.10
1.050.10
1.360.15
1.300.15
1.270.18
0.430.05
0.270.04
0.330.04
Treated
1.090.06
7.300.95
12.881.12
1.060.06
1.080.08
1.300.10
1.300.09
1.300.10
0.430.02
0.270.02
0.330.03
Results are expressed in mean S.D. P>0.05. (Control N = 12; Treated N = 10)
Table 3. Weights of vital and reproductive organs of control and Rosmarinus officinalis-treated adult male Wistar rats with twice
the dose during exposure of five days and death at three days after the end of treatment
Weights
Brain
Pituitary gland (mg)
Liver
Right kidney
Left kidney
Lung
Right testis
Left testis
Left epididymis
Prostate
Seminal vesicle
Control
1.150.03
8.581.73
11.901.58
1.080.10
1.060.11
1.320.11
1.350.04
1.310.06
0.460.02
0.310.07
0.330.03
329
Groups (g)
Treated
1.150.05
7.831.27
11.241.59
1.040.09
1.050.08
1.240.09
1.280.11
1.290.07
0.460.03
0.300.05
0.400.03*
Preliminary assessment of Rosmarinus officinalis toxicity on male Wistar rats organs and reproductive system
25.0
Treated
Control
22.5
20.0
17.5
15.0
0
Day
Figure 7. Sperm concentration of the right epididymis cauda of control and R. officinalis-treated
Wistar rats killed at three (a and c) and 14 days (b) after the end of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Our preliminary assessment of possible male
reproductive toxicity of R. officinalis administered to
mature male Wistar rats showed an adverse effect on the
seminal vesicle but indicates that there are no toxic effects
on the testis, epididymis and prostate. No interference
with the spermatogenic cycle and consequently with
gamete production was detected considering the acute
reproductive test protocol employed in this work.
However, further studies adopting chronic protocols
should be applied to investigate the effect of different
doses over several spermatogenic cycles in order to
obtain more conclusive results about this plant toxicity
and antifertility activity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by BIC/UFJF. The
authors are grateful to Paulo Srgio do Carmo for the
technical assistance.
REFERENCES
Abe F, Yamauchi T, Nagao T, Kinjo J, Okabe H, Higo H,
Akahane H 2002. Ursolic acid as a trypanocidal
constituent in rosemary. Biol Pharm Bull 25: 14851487.
Al-Sereiti MR, Abu-Amer KM, Sen P 1999. Pharmacology
of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis Linn.) and its
therapeutic potentials. Indian J Exp Biol 37: 124130.
Amin A, Hamzer AA 2005. Hepatoprotective effects of
Hibiscus, Rosmarinus and Salvia on azathioprineinduced toxicity in rats. Life Sci 77: 266-278.
Rev. Bras. Farmacogn.
Braz J. Pharmacogn.
16(3):jul/set. 2006
330
Rita de Cssia da Silveira e S, Magda N. Leite, Leandra E.G. Oliveira, Melina M. Toledo, Tnia C. Greggio, Martha O. Guerra
331
Preliminary assessment of Rosmarinus officinalis toxicity on male Wistar rats organs and reproductive system
Press, p. 195-213.
Mangena T, Muyima NY 1999. Comparative evaluation of the
antimicrobial activities of essential oils of Artemisia
afra, Pteronia incana and Rosmarinus officinalis
on selected bacteria and yeast strains. Lett Appl
Microbiol 28: 291-296.
Maris L, Giovanni O 1958. Isolation and constitution of
rosmarinic acid from Rosmarinus officinalis.
Ricerca in Science 28: 2329-2333.
Martins ER, Castro DM, Castellani DC, Dias JE 2000. Plantas
Medicinais. Viosa: Editora UFV, p. 70-73.
Mason JM, Kang YJ 1994. Test methods for assessing female
reproductive and developmental toxicology. In:
Haye AW (Ed.) Principle and methods of toxicology.
3 ed., New York: Raven Press, p. 980-1037.
Mengue SS, Mentz LA, Schenkel EP 2001. Uso de plantas
medicinais na gravidez. Rev Bras Farmacogn 11:
21-35.
Mooradian AD, Morley JE, Korenman SG 1987. Biological
actions of androgens. Endocrine Rev 8: 1-27.
Moraes GES 1994. Espermocitograma. Porto Alegre: Editora
Mdica Missau, p. 61-93.
Norton S 1996. Toxic effects of plants. In: Klaassen CD (Ed)
Casarett and Doulls Toxicology: The Basic Science
of Poisons. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, p. 841-854.
Ruppelt BM, Pereira EFR, Gonalves LC, Pereira NA 1990.
Abordagem farmacolgica de plantas recomendadas
na medicina folclrica como antiofdicas. I
Atividades analgsica e antiinflamatria. Rev Bras
Farm 71: 54-56.
Santos CAM, Torres KR, Leonart R 1988. Plantas Medicinais
(herbarium, flora et scientia). 2 ed. So Paulo:
cone, p. 29.
Singletary KW, Nelshoppen JM 1991. Inhibition of 7,12dimethylbenz[a]antracene
(DMBA)-induced
mammary tumorigenesis and of in vivo formation
of mammary DMBA-DNA adducts by rosemary
extract. Cancer Lett 60: 169-175.
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ 1995. Biometry. The principles and practice
of statistics in biological research. 3 ed. New York:
WH Freeman p. 850.
Sotelo-Flix JL, Martinez-Fong D, Muriel P, Santilln RL,
Castillo D, Yahuaca P 2002. Evaluation of the
effectiveness of Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiaceae)
in the alleviation of carbon tetrachloride-induced
acute hepatotoxicity in the rat. J Ethnopharmacol
81: 145-154.
Soufir JC, Radique C, Dantec MC, Garner D, Jegou B
1989. Gossypol-induced modifications in the
microenvironment of rat epididymal spermatozoa.
J Reprod Fertil 86: 427-434.
Sundaram K, Witorsch RJ 1995. Toxic effects on the testes. In:
Witorsch RJ (Ed.) Reproductive Toxicology, New
York: Raven Press, p. 99-121.
Thorsen MA, Hildebrandt KS 2003. Quantitative determination
of phenolic diterpenes in rosemary extracts. Aspects
of accurate quantification. J Chromatogr A 995:
119-125.
Trres AR, Oliveira RAG, Diniz MFFM, Arajo EC 2005.
Estudo sobre o uso de plantas medicinais em
crianas hospitalizadas da cidade de Joo Pessoa:
riscos e benefcios. Rev Bras Farmacogn 15: 373380.
332